Inland Waters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inland Waters INLAND WATERS Water Quality Trends • Condition of rivers and creeks with respect to their nutrient and turbidity levels: STABLE generally in a moderate to poor condition. • The change in river health as indicated by macroinvertebrates (with the exception of the River Murray): DECLINING due to the effects of the prolonged drought. • Groundwater quality: STABLE throughout most of the state although nutrients remain poor in many regions and salinity is increasing in some. Goal South Australia’s creeks and rivers support T3.9 Sustainable Water Supply: South important aquatic ecosystems that Australia’s water resources are managed sustain a diverse range of plants and within sustainable limits. animals. Some supply drinking water South Australia’s Strategic Plan 2007 for much of the state’s population, particularly those linked to Adelaide’s reservoirs in the Mount Lofty Ranges. They also sustain much of our irrigated Water Quality and a agriculture, manufacturing, food sustainable South Australia processing and winemaking industries and provide a focus for water-based zone they occur as mound springs and Inland waters include creeks and rivers, recreational activities and eco-tourism. seasonal swamps. wetlands, lakes and groundwater systems. The pollution of creeks and rivers and Also found along the coast as mudflats The chapter does not review the state of the reduced flow volumes compromise and salt marshes, wetlands are generally River Murray, which given its prominence is these values, which are also impacted areas of standing, rather than flowing dealt with separately. from natural disturbances such as floods, water. They can be permanently, Creeks and rivers are generally flowing prolonged drought and bushfires. seasonally or episodically wet and all water habitats, although they may dry out undergo varying degrees of drying seasonally. In the arid zone creeks may flow Wetlands during hot, dry summer months. only occasionally and can flood across vast Wetlands are the swamps, lakes and Among the most biologically productive areas, but typically the only aquatic habitats marshes found along rivers and on and diverse habitats on the planet, consist of disconnected pools. floodplains. In low-lying areas of the arid wetlands perform important functions 38 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT 2008 Water Quality KEY FACTS Partly wooded swamp, Cooper Creek system. Photo: Wetlands International. Goyder Lagoon. Photo: Wetlands International. that include the biochemical Impact of Deteriorating Water Quality transformation and storage of water, Drinking water quality and human health production of living plants and animals, and decomposition of organic matter. Many rivers and creeks in the Mount Many also have significant recreational Lofty Ranges and the River Murray Basin and tourism values, e.g. Coongie Lakes, are source waters that feed into major Lake Eyre and the mound springs in the metropolitan reservoirs and groundwater- Far North, and Blue Lake in Mt Gambier. based supplies. In the South East and numerous remote communities, Other wetland values include their groundwater bodies are also vulnerable spiritual and cultural significance for to pollution arising from overlying Indigenous Australians, importance land use. Densely wooded swamp, Cooper Creek system. in some areas for grazing stock, and Photo: Wetlands International. in others as sites for research and Deteriorating water quality potentially community involvement in monitoring impacts on drinking water quality, and sometimes managing specific affecting human health (the protozoan habitats. parasites Giardia and Cryptosporidium are frequently detected in the source ‘Groundwater is Wetland areas have however, been waters of major reservoirs), and increases extensively modified, filled and drained the public health risks associated with also fundamental to since European settlement and close water treatment process failure and to 90% of those in southeastern South additional treatment costs in some maintaining flows in Australia have been lost (Spiers 1999). instances. Substantial funding is being According to the Department of directed to the amelioration of these many of the state’s Environment and Heritage (DEH, 2003), risks by improved riparian zone and other approximately 30% of wetlands existing catchment management actions. creeks, rivers and before European settlement along the Fleurieu Peninsula remain, with just 1% There are potential risks to human of the original extent of wetlands in a health if groundwater contaminated wetlands.’ pristine condition. with disease-causing micro-organisms or a high concentration of nitrate from Groundwater fertilisers, stock and septic tanks is used for drinking purposes. Organic solvent South Australia’s groundwater resources contamination of groundwater can also are also critical to the state, providing be a problem for safe use of the resource. social, economic and environmental benefits. Groundwater provides a Reduced productivity significant amount of the state’s irrigation water for horticulture, agriculture and The use of irrigation water that has viticulture and is an invaluable drinking high salinity or boron levels can affect water supply to regions where there is horticultural and agricultural productivity little surface water run-off and effective by affecting plant and soil health. storage sites are unavailable. Damage to infrastructure Groundwater is also fundamental to maintaining flows in many of the state’s High salt content in water can corrode creeks, rivers and wetlands. water distribution systems and cause STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT 2008 39 INLAND WATERS Brukunga Mine Brukunga mine, situated 4km north of Nairne in the Mount Lofty Ranges, operated between 1955 and 1972 to extract iron pyrites minerals that was used for the production of sulphuric acid and superphosphate. Acid drainage from the exposed quarry floor, overburden dumps and metallurgical concentrating plant tailings in an adjacent valley polluted the Dawesley Creek, making water unfit for livestock consumption and affecting biodiversity in the watershed. In 1977 the state government accepted responsibility for rehabilitation of Brukunga and three years later commissioned a lime neutralisation plant to treat acid water. Nestlings of Nankeen Night-heron. From 1988, with the collaboration of schools and conservation volunteers, the once- Photo: Wetlands International barren tailings dams have received a cover of soil and have been progressively revegetated. ‘Poor water quality In 2003, water in Dawesley Creek was diverted past the mine, restoring downstream use for livestock and irrigation. Water collected from the mine site is captured before can potentially cause entering the creek and neutralised with lime, resulting in a gypsum-like mud, which is being progressively spread over parts of the old quarry and revegetated to stabilise permanent and it and reduce acid runoff from the site. irreversible damage to ecosystems and destroy valuable habitats if left unmanaged.’ The rehabilitation of the tailings dam area at Brukunga. Photo: PIRSA damage to household appliances and survive, such as coastal springs and industrial infrastructure. underground fauna (stygofauna). Increased water treatment costs Recreation and tourism Deteriorating water quality can have Polluted water bodies jeopardise an economic impact associated with recreation and tourism activities and additional water quality management lead to closures, particularly after rainfall actions, including increased treatment events. Blue-green algal blooms, such costs to make the water safe and as those that can occur in Torrens Lake palatable for drinking. over summer months, may generate odours and be toxic, restricting Biodiversity recreation. Declining water quality will have an Elevated turbidity reduces recreational impact on the health of aquatic plant safety and the aesthetics of some waters. and animal communities, particularly pollution from heavy metals, high nutrient and salinity levels and extensive algal blooms. Indicators Poor water quality can potentially cause CONDITION INDICATORS: permanent and irreversible damage to ecosystems and destroy valuable • Exceedences of water quality guidelines habitats if left unmanaged. Deteriorating for creeks, rivers and groundwater groundwater quality will have an impact The quality of water in South Australia’s on the ecological communities that creeks, rivers and groundwater is assessed rely on it rather than surface water to against national water quality guidelines. 40 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT 2008 Water Quality • River health assessed according compared to the National Water Quality to the Australian River Assessment Guidelines (NWQG) for the protection of System (AUSRIVAS) freshwater ecosystems. Table 2.1 shows how the data was analysed Provides an indication of the ecological health of rivers and creeks by assessing Nutrient and turbidity data at each site the type and numbers of macroinverte- were ranked from highest value to lowest brates present. value. The 90th and the 50th percentiles, i.e. the median, were then selected from • The condition of wetlands the ranked datasets for comparison with Gives a rating of the condition of the NWQGs. Water quality was classified wetlands across the state. as good, moderate or poor with respect to these indicators according to the criteria shown in Table 2.1: What is the current The proportion of monitoring sites that Whatsituation? is the current situation? were classified as
Recommended publications
  • Painted Snippets the Newsletter of the Australian Painted Snipe Project
    Painted Snippets The newsletter of the Australian Painted Snipe Project Volume 4 May 2012 A stunning female bathes herself, unperturbed by onlookers at Canberra’s Kelly Swamp. Photo: David Stowe None of us would have predicted the events Just add water which unfolded in the months that followed, It’s been an eventful 2 years since our last when one-in-10-year rains extended south edition of Painted Snippets hit the stands. After from the tropics and caused extensive flooding the 2008/09 summer, our concerns for the throughout 4 states, rejuvenating wetland and species were reinforced by a return of just 11 river systems throughout the Murray Darling, individuals observed across Australia. Bulloo-Bancannia and Lake Eyre Basins as well as across the Top End. Once the floods began to subside, observers Contents ventured out, discovering ephemeral wetlands which, in some cases, hadn’t been inundated in 1. Just Add Water 20 years! Soon enough, Australian Painted 2. Around the soggy grounds Snipe (APS) records started rolling in. With 5. Déjà vu 2005 conditions remaining wet throughout the year 6. A bird in the hand and Tropical Cyclone Yasi providing similar flows in early 2011, the last 2 years have seen 7. BirdLife Australia Wetland Birds Project over 400 individual APS1 recorded (Fig 2)across 8. iBis for your iPhone every state and territory except Tasmania, in 8. APS EPBC listing upgrade what has been true testament to the 9. Moolort Plains wetland project opportunistic nature of this enigmatic wader. 9. APS surveys. How to contribute to species conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity
    Biodiversity KEY5 FACTS as hunting), as pasture grasses or as aquarium species Introduced (in the case of some marine species). They have also • Introduced species are been introduced accidentally, such as in shipments of recognised as a leading Species imported grain or in ballast water. cause of biodiversity loss Introduced plants, or weeds, can invade and world-wide. compete with native plant species for space, light, Trends water and nutrients and because of their rapid growth rates they can quickly smother native vegetation. • Rabbit numbers: a DECLINE since Similarly to weeds, many introduced animals compete introduction of Rabbit Haemorrhagic with and predate on native animals and impact on Disease (RHD, also known as calicivirus) native vegetation. They have high reproductive rates although the extent of the decline varies and can tolerate a wide range of habitats. As a result across the State. they often establish populations very quickly. •Fox numbers: DOWN in high priority Weeds can provide shelter for pest animals, conservation areas due to large-scale although they can provide food for or become habitat baiting programs; STILL A PROBLEM in for native animals. Blackberry, for example, is an ideal other parts of the State. habitat for the threatened Southern Brown Bandicoot. This illustrates the complexity of issues associated •Feral camel and deer numbers: UP. with pest control and highlights the need for control •Feral goat numbers: DECLINING across measures to have considered specific conservation Weed affected land – Mount Lofty Ranges the State. outcomes to be undertaken over time and to be Photo: Kym Nicolson •Feral pig numbers: UNKNOWN.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Office of Water Science, Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, Brisbane
    Lake Eyre Basin Springs Assessment Project Hydrogeology, cultural history and biological values of springs in the Barcaldine, Springvale and Flinders River supergroups, Galilee Basin and Tertiary springs of western Queensland 2016 Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation Prepared by R.J. Fensham, J.L. Silcock, B. Laffineur, H.J. MacDermott Queensland Herbarium Science Delivery Division Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation PO Box 5078 Brisbane QLD 4001 © The Commonwealth of Australia 2016 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence Under this licence you are free, without having to seek permission from DSITI or the Commonwealth, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the source of the publication. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5725 Citation Fensham, R.J., Silcock, J.L., Laffineur, B., MacDermott, H.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Plan for the South East of South Australia 1999
    SUMMARY Biodiversity Plan for the South East of South Australia 1999 rks & W Pa i Department for Environment ld l a l i f n e o i t Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs a N South Government of South Australia Australia AUTHORS Tim Croft (National Parks & Wildlife SA) Georgina House (QED) Alison Oppermann (National Parks & Wildlife SA) Ann Shaw Rungie (QED) Tatia Zubrinich (PPK Environment & Infrastructure Pty Ltd) CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN National Parks & Wildlife SA (Cover) Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Planning SA Pierris Kahrimanis PPK Environment & Infrastructure Pty Ltd ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are grateful to Professor Hugh Possingham, the Nature Conservation Society, and the South Australian Farmers Federation in providing the stimulus for the Biodiversity Planning Program and for their ongoing support and involvement Dr Bob Inns and Professor Possingham have also contributed significantly towards the information and design of the South East Biodiversity Plan. We also thank members of the South East community who have provided direction and input into the plan through consultation and participation in workshops © Department for Environment, Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs, 1999 ISBN 0 7308 5863 4 Cover Photographs (top to bottom) Lowan phebalium (Phebalium lowanense) Photo: D.N. Kraehenbuehl Swamp Skink (Egernia coventryi) Photo: J. van Weenen Jaffray Swamp Photo: G. Carpenter Little Pygmy Possum (Cercartetus lepidus) Photo: P. Aitken Red-necked Wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus) Photo: P. Canty 2 diversity Plan for the South East of South Australia — Summary Foreword The conservation of our natural biodiversity is essential for the functioning of natural systems. Aside from the intrinsic importance of conserving the diversity of species many of South Australia's economic activities are based on the sustainable use, conservation and management of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • DUCK HUNTING in VICTORIA 2020 Background
    DUCK HUNTING IN VICTORIA 2020 Background The Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 provide for an annual duck season running from 3rd Saturday in March until the 2nd Monday in June in each year (80 days in 2020) and a 10 bird bag limit. Section 86 of the Wildlife Act 1975 enables the responsible Ministers to vary these arrangements. The Game Management Authority (GMA) is an independent statutory authority responsible for the regulation of game hunting in Victoria. Part of their statutory function is to make recommendations to the relevant Ministers (Agriculture and Environment) in relation to open and closed seasons, bag limits and declaring public and private land open or closed for hunting. A number of factors are reviewed each year to ensure duck hunting remains sustainable, including current and predicted environmental conditions such as habitat extent and duck population distribution, abundance and breeding. This review however, overlooks several reports and assessments which are intended for use in managing game and hunting which would offer a more complete picture of habitat, population, abundance and breeding, we will attempt to summarise some of these in this submission, these include: • 2019-20 Annual Waterfowl Quota Report to the Game Licensing Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries • Assessment of Waterfowl Abundance and Wetland Condition in South- Eastern Australia, South Australian Department for Environment and Water • Victorian Summer waterbird Count, 2019, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research As a key stakeholder representing 17,8011 members, Field & Game Australia Inc. (FGA) has been invited by GMA to participate in the Stakeholder Meeting and provide information to assist GMA brief the relevant Ministers, FGA thanks GMA for this opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site PLACE NO.: 26454
    South Australian HERITAGE COUNCIL SUMMARY OF STATE HERITAGE PLACE REGISTER ENTRY Entry in the South Australian Heritage Register in accordance with the Heritage Places Act 1993 NAME: Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site PLACE NO.: 26454 ADDRESS: Franklin Parade, Encounter Bay, SA 5211 Uncovered well 23 November 2017 Site works complete June 2019 Source DEW Source DEW Cultural Safety Warning Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should be aware that this document may contain images or names of people who have since passed away. STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE The Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site is on the lands and waters of the Ramindjeri people of the lower Fleurieu Peninsula, who are a part of the Ngarrindjeri Nation. The site represents a once significant early industry that no longer exists in South Australia. Founded by the South Australian Company in 1837 and continually operating until 1851, it was the longest-running whaling station in the State. It played an important role in the establishment of the whaling industry in South Australia as a prototype for other whaling stations and made a notable contribution to the fledgling colony’s economic development. The Rosetta Head Whaling Station is also an important contact site between European colonists and the Ramindjeri people. To Ramindjeri people, the whale is known as Kondli (a spiritual being), and due to their connection and knowledge, a number of Ramindjeri were employed at the station as labourers and boat crews. Therefore, Rosetta Head is one of the first places in South Australia where European and Aboriginal people worked side by side.
    [Show full text]
  • Beachport-And-Surrounds-March-2020.Pdf
    Wattle Range Council Welcome NEW RESIDENT WELCOME PACK Beachport, Southend, Kangaroo Inn, and Furner Welcome to Wattle Range Council, located from Border to Coast in the Limestone Coast Below is a list of contents included in this pack. We hope you find it useful and please do not hesitate to call us at the Beachport Visitor Information Centre on (08) 8735 8029 if you require any other information. Table of Contents List of councillors .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 HOUSING, CHILDCARE & EDUCATION..................................................................................................................................... 4 Housing ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Schools ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Childcare / Kindergarten ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Playgroups ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Other Educational Services ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Hill Complex
    Broken Hill Complex Bioregion resources Photo Mulyangarie, DEH Broken Hill Complex The Broken Hill Complex bioregion is located in western New South Wales and eastern South Australia, spanning the NSW-SA border. It includes all of the Barrier Ranges and covers a huge area of nearly 5.7 million hectares with approximately 33% falling in South Australia! It has an arid climate with dry hot summers and mild winters. The average rainfall is 222mm per year, with slightly more rainfall occurring in summer. The bioregion is rich with Aboriginal cultural history, with numerous archaeological sites of significance. Biodiversity and habitat The bioregion consists of low ranges, and gently rounded hills and depressions. The main vegetation types are chenopod and samphire shrublands; casuarina forests and woodlands and acacia shrublands. Threatened animal species include the Yellow-footed Rock- wallaby and Australian Bustard. Grazing, mining and wood collection for over 100 years has led to a decline in understory plant species and cover, affecting ground nesting birds and ground feeding insectivores. 2 | Broken Hill Complex Photo by Francisco Facelli Broken Hill Complex Threats Threats to the Broken Hill Complex bioregion and its dependent species include: For Further information • erosion and degradation caused by overgrazing by sheep, To get involved or for more information please cattle, goats, rabbits and macropods phone your nearest Natural Resources Centre or • competition and predation by feral animals such as rabbits, visit www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au
    [Show full text]
  • Cell F10 Watson's Gap to the Hindmarsh River L Andforms From
    Cell F10 Watson’s Gap to the Hindmarsh River L andforms From Watson’s Gap, where a usually closed small creek reaches the b each, to the H indmarsh R iv er, wav e energ y steadily decreases from medium hig h to medium low. R ock y reefs are common, prominent at the reef- controlled foreland H ayb oroug h P oint (photog raph ab ov e) and emerg ing as rock s on the b each at C hiton R ock s. T he medium to coarse sand b each is often steep and is characterised b y many small rips. D unes, 5 0 to 2 0 0 m wide and a talus slope front of a 2 0 m b luff, terminating a sloping coastal plain. B enthic Hab itat/ B iota P latform reef with patches of sand and seag rass (inshore seag rass is rare b etween C ape J erv is and L acepede B ay, mak ing E ncounter B ay seag rasses reg ionally sig nificant as hab itat). O liv ers R eef (off H ayb oroug h P oint), limestone reef in 4 -6 m. R eefwatch monitoring . M edium to hig h coastal shrub land on the dunes. R ush and sedg e in small swamp at Watson’s Gap. S wamp paperb ark woodland adjacent to the H indmarsh R iv er. L and U se/ L and O w nership C oastal plain is almost entirely residential dev elopment. T he coastal reserv e, including small reserv es ab ov e the b luff, the b luff and the dunes are under the care and control of C ouncil.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the South Australian Lake Eyre Basin Fisheries
    MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN LAKE EYRE BASIN FISHERIES Part 1 – Commercial and recreational fisheries Part 2 – Yandruwandha Yawarrawarrka Aboriginal traditional fishery Approved by the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries pursuant to section 44 of the Fisheries Management Act 2007. Hon Gail Gago MLC Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries 1 March 2013 Page 1 of 118 PIRSA Fisheries & Aquaculture (A Division of Primary Industries and Regions South Australia) GPO Box 1625 ADELAIDE SA 5001 www.pir.sa.gov.au/fisheries Tel: (08) 8226 0900 Fax: (08) 8226 0434 © Primary Industries and Regions South Australia 2013 Disclaimer: This management plan has been prepared pursuant to the Fisheries Management Act 2007 (South Australia) for the purpose of the administration of that Act. The Department of Primary Industries and Regions SA (and the Government of South Australia) make no representation, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this management plan or as to the suitability of that information for any particular purpose. Use of or reliance upon information contained in this management plan is at the sole risk of the user in all things and the Department of Primary Industries and Regions SA (and the Government of South Australia) disclaim any responsibility for that use or reliance and any liability to the user. Copyright Notice: This work is copyright. Copyright in this work is owned by the Government of South Australia. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Commonwealth), no part of this work may be reproduced by any process without written permission of the Government of South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Register for Period 01.01.2019-31.12.2019
    Development Register for Period 01.01.2019-31.12.2019 Application No 640/001/19 Application Date 07/01/2019 Planning Approval 21/01/2019 Approved Application received 07/01/2019 Building Approval 21/01/2019 Approved Applicants Name JAMES BRAITHWAITE Building Application 7/01/2019 Land Division Approval Applicants Address 66 COOKE STREET Development Approval 21/01/2019 Approved KINGSTON SE SA 5275 Conditions availabe on request Planning Conditions 3 Development Commenced 01/03/2019 Property House No 24ü24 Building Conditions 2 Development Completed Lot 2 Land Division Conditions 0 Concurrence Required Section Private Certifier Conditions 0 Date Appeal Lodged Plan D33844 DAC Conditions 0 Appeal Decision Property Street MARINEüMARINE PARADEüPARADE Fees Amount Due Amount Distributed Property Suburb KINGSTON SEüKINGSTON SE Title 5697/901 LODGEMENT FEE $136.00 $0.00 Hundred LACEPEDE DEVELOPMENT COST - COMPLYING $887.50 $44.38 BUILDING FEES $1,599.20 $101.77 Development Description Septic App. Fee -New CWMS/Onsite/Aerobic $457.00 $0.00 DWELLING Relevant Authority Manager Environment & Inspectorial Services Referred to Private Certifier Name Request Pursuant to R15 (7(b) N Development Register for Period 01.01.2019-31.12.2019 Application No 640/001/20 Application Date 07/01/2020 Planning Approval Application received 07/01/2020 Building Approval Applicants Name DW & SM SIEGERT Building Application 7/01/2020 Land Division Approval Applicants Address PO BOX 613 Development Approval NARACOORTE SA 5271 Conditions availabe on request Planning Conditions
    [Show full text]