A Legal Proposition Supporting the Coexistence of Anticipatory Self

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Legal Proposition Supporting the Coexistence of Anticipatory Self 1 Does anticipatory self-defence coexist with the Charter of the United Nations 1945? Murray Colin Alder LLM This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2011 2 I declare that this thesis is my own account of my own research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution _____________________ Murray Colin Alder 3 ABSTRACT An important question of public international law unresolved by the existing scholarly debate is whether anticipatory self-defence coexists with the Charter of the United Nations 1945. The debated issue can be simply stated. In 1945, Article 51 of the Charter recognised a state‟s inherent right of self- defence and protected this right against impairment by the treaty‟s operation. However, the article simultaneously preconditioned the exercise of this right on the occurrence of an „armed attack‟. Scholars remain divided as to whether a state may exercise this right after it has suffered such an attack, or whether a state may exercise this right at some time before such an attack. The debate has almost exclusively focussed on an interpretation of Article 51. My thesis shifts the focus from Article 51. I have adopted an historical methodology to focus on the legal nature of the inherent right of self-defence and of the international customary law principles of immediacy and necessity (principles which historically have restricted the exercise of this right). My focus demonstrates how these elements of international law enabled Article 51 in 1945 to authorise a state to exercise its inherent right of self-defence against an imminent threat of armed force. Absent from the existing scholarly debate (and from international law) is a definition of the legal commencement of an armed attack for the purpose of Article 51. Without this definition, the beginning of the very conduct to which the precondition in Article 51 relates remains illusory. This, in turn, continues the 4 uncertainty over the earliest point in time at which the inherent right of self- defence may be exercised under that article. Identifying this point in time is, in my opinion, the underlying legal question debated by scholars. The resolution of this question will consequently answer the question posed by my thesis. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 1.1 Introduction 8 1.2 Purpose 14 1.3 Central question of law and supporting questions of law 14 1.4 Methodology 17 1.5 Literature review 19 1.6 Structure 27 Chapter 2 The use of force between states before 1815 – the sovereign right to use war 2.1 Introduction 32 2.2 The rationale for the sovereign right to use war 34 2.3 The division of war into offensive and defensive war 41 2.4 The theory of „just war‟ 44 2.4.1 The limitations of „just war‟ 2.4.2 The legal scope of the sovereign right to use war defensively 2.4.3 The early references to considerations of immediacy, necessity and proportionality 2.4.4 The legal commencement of an armed attack between sovereign states 2.5 Conclusion 65 Chapter 3 The use of force between states – 1815 to 1914 3.1 Introduction 69 3.2 International customary law 70 3.2.1 Instances of the use of war, or force 3.2.2 Peaceful settlement of disputes 3.2.3 Caroline 3.2.3.1 Immediacy 3.2.3.2 Necessity 3.2.3.3 Proportionality 3.3 The legal scope of defensive war 93 3.4 The legal commencement of an armed attack between sovereign states 94 3.5 Conclusion 94 Chapter 4 The use force between states – 1919 to 1939 4.1 Introduction 98 4.2 International customary law – an overview 101 4.2.1 Instances of the use of war, or force 4.2.2 Treaties restricting the use of war 4.2.1.1 Covenant of the League of Nations 1919 4.2.1.2 Geneva Protocol 1924 4.2.1.3 Locarno Treaties 1925 4.2.1.4 General Treaty for the Renunciation of War 1928 4.3 The corollary legal right created by the General Treaty 124 4.4 The inherent right of self-defence 126 4.4.1 The legal scope of the inherent right of self-defence 4.4.2 The legal commencement of an armed attack between sovereign states 4.5 Conclusion 132 6 Chapter 5 The use of force between states – 1945 to the present 5.1 Introduction 138 5.2 The Charter of the United Nations 1945 139 5.2.1 The prohibition of the use, or threat, of force 5.2.1.1 Article 2(4) 5.2.1.2 A new legal right derived from Article 2(4) 5.2.1.3 Chapter VII 5.2.2 The recognition of the inherent right of self-defence and its protection against impairment in 1945 5.2.2.1 Article 51 5.2.2.2 The travaux preparatoires of Article 51 5.2.2.3 The precondition of the occurrence of an armed attack in Article 51 5.3 A legal basis in 1945 for the coexistence of anticipatory self-defence and the Charter 166 5.4 Conclusion 168 Chapter 6 The existing scholarly debate and judicial developments in self-defence after 1945 6.1 Introduction 172 6.2 Scholarly developments 174 6.2.1 On the rationale for the inherent right of self-defence 6.2.2 On the rationale for anticipatory self-defence 6.2.3 On the coexistence of anticipatory self-defence and the Charter 6.2.3.1 The positivist philosophy 6.2.3.2 The realist philosophy 6.2.3.3 The neutralist philosophy 6.2.4 On the definition of an armed attack 6.2.5 Can the views scholarly philosophies be reconciled? 6.3 Judgments of the International Court of Justice 209 6.3.1 The inherent right of self-defence 6.3.2 International customary law principles 6.3.3 Article 51 6.4 Conclusion 217 Chapter 7 State practice in self-defence since 1945 7.1 Introduction 221 7.2 The post-Charter period to 1962 222 7.3 Controversial instances of the use of force after 1962 sought to be justified by Article 51 and the inherent right of self-defence 227 7.3.1 1962-1986 7.3.1.1 Conclusion 7.3.2 1986-the present 7.3.2.1 Conclusion 7.4 Conclusion 291 Chapter 8 Conclusion 296 7 Bibliography Scholarly Texts 304 Journal Articles 312 Cases 318 Treaties 320 Documents 324 Security Council Resolutions General Assembly Resolutions United Nations documents Other documents Domestic Statutes 350 8 Chapter 1 1.1 Introduction A contentious question in international law is whether anticipatory self-defence1 coexists with the Charter of the United Nations 1945. The existing scholarly debate over this question of law is primarily divided into two apparently competing philosophies. Generally, one philosophy asserts that anticipatory self-defence was impliedly extinguished in 1945 because Article 51 of the Charter preconditioned an exercise of the inherent right of self-defence on the occurrence of an armed attack. The other philosophy rejects this literal interpretation of Article 51 because it erodes the concept of self-defence by condemning a state to suffer the physical consequences of an armed attack before exercising its inherent right of self- defence. Article 51 states: Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.2 The question posed by my thesis is deliberately couched in the same terms as that hitherto debated. However, I suspect this question has not been authoritatively answered because the true question of law which underlies it has not been recognised. This true question is to define the legal scope of the inherent right of self-defence under the Charter in 1945. By „legal scope‟ I mean when and against 1 The term „anticipatory self-defence‟ when used in my thesis describes the legal basis in international law which authorises a state to use armed force against a threat of such force. 2 Charter of the United Nations 1945, opened for signature 26 June 1945, 59 Stat 1031 (entered into force 24 October 1945) hereafter termed „Charter‟. 9 which conduct the inherent right of self-defence could lawfully be exercised at that time. Answering this underlying question of law will answer the question posed by my thesis. The debate shows the reverse not to be the case. I have formed my suspicion because neither philosophy expressly asserts that Article 51 required a state in 1945 to suffer the physical commencement of an armed attack before exercising its inherent right of self-defence. This being so, the debate actually concerns itself with ascertaining the earliest point in time at which international law in 1945 authorised a state to exercise its inherent right of self-defence before being physically attacked. Three things are necessary to answer this underlying question of law. The first is an understanding of the rationale in international law for the inherent right of self- defence3 and for anticipatory self-defence.
Recommended publications
  • Library of Congress Classification
    KZ LAW OF NATIONS KZ Law of nations Class here works on legal principles recognized by nations, and rules governing conduct of nations and their relations with one another, including supra-regional Intergovernmental Organizations (IGO's) and the legal regimes governing such organizations Class here the sources of international law, i.e. the law of treaties, arbitral awards and judicial decisions of the international courts For organizations with missions limited to a particular region, see the appropriate K subclass for the regional organization (e. g. KJE for the Council of Europe) For works on comparative and uniform law of two or more countries in different regions, and on private international law (Conflict of laws), see subclass K Bibliography For bibliography of special topics, see the topic 2 Bibliography of bibliography 3 General bibliography 4 Library catalogs. Union lists 5 Bibliography of periodicals, society publications, collections, etc. For indexes to a particular publication, see the publication 5.5 Indexes to periodical articles Periodicals For periodical articles consisting primarily of informative material, e. g. news letters, bulletins, etc. relating to a particular subject, see the subject. For collected papers, proceedings, etc. of a particular congress, see the congress. For particular society publications, e. g. directories, see the society For periodicals consisting predominantly of legal articles, regardless of subject matter and jurisdiction see K1+ 21 Annuals. Yearbooks Class here annual publications and surveys on current international law developments and analysis of recent events, including official document collections e. g. Annuaire français de droit international; Asian Yearbook of International Law; British Yearbook of International Law; Jahrbuch für internationales Recht; Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg For annual reports on legal activities of intergovernmental organizations, see the organization (e.
    [Show full text]
  • Delenda Est Haec Carthago: the Ostend Company As a Problem of European Great Power Politics (1722-1727)1
    Delenda est haec Carthago: The Ostend Company As A Problem Of European Great Power Politics (1722-1727)1 Dr. Frederik Dhondt Legal History Institute, Ghent University Summary The Ostend Company (1722-1731) is a symbol of present-day Belgium’s strangling by European Great Power politics in the Ancien Régime, and more specifically of the limitations imposed on the Southern Netherlands by the Dutch Republic in 1648. The present contribution analyses the right of Emperor Charles VI to send out ships to the East Indies. Pamphlets by Abraham Westerveen and Jean Barbeyrac, argued for the exclusion of the Southern Netherlands based on the Treaty of Munster. Against this, Patrice de Neny and Jean du Mont invoked the peremptory character of the natural law-rules governing free trade. However, the Treaty of Commerce concluded between Charles VI and Philip V, King of Spain, on 1 May 1725, constituted a strong basis to refute the Dutch attacks. Yet, norm hierarchy between the balance of power inscribed in the Peace of Utrecht and secondary bilateral treaties between sovereigns dominated multilateral diplomacy after 1713 and prejudiced the “Belgian” East India trade. Keywords International Law, Legal History, International Relations Introduction2 [Les Nations] les plus prudentes cherchent à se procurer par des Traités, les sécours & les avantages, que la Loi Naturelle leur assureroit, si les pernicieux conseils d’une fausse Politique ne la rendoient inefficace. Vattel, Le Droit des Gens3 Concerning the OSTEND COMPANY […] DELENDA EST HAEC CARTHAGO The Importance of the Ostend-Company consider’d, 17264 In Belgian historiography, the Imperial East India Company created in Ostend (1722-1731) is often presented as an example of the sorry fate the Southern Netherlands had to suffer from the Dutch Revolt to the end of the French Revolutionary Wars5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genealogy of the Balance of Power
    The London School of Economics and Political Science A Genealogy of the Balance of Power Morten Skumsrud Andersen A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, January 2016. Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 104,177 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Susan Høivik. Abstract The Balance of Power is one of the foundational concepts for the academic discipline of International Relations. Most treat it as a theoretical or analytical concept – a tool that scholars use to investigate the workings of world politics. However, there is a gap in the literature on the balance of power; it is also a concept used by political practitioners and diplomats in concrete debates and disputes throughout centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antecedents of the Treaty of Hanover
    1913 691 The Antecedents of the Treaty of Hanover p year 1725 saw a revolution in European politics. The Downloaded from _L death of Peter the Great on 8 February, which created a new situation in the north, waa followed by the treaties of Vienna between Austria and Spain, winch changed the whole political oonditionB of the sorrth. ^grJu-tt them, mainly, was directed the treaty of alliance between Great Britain, Fiance, and Prussia signed at Hanover on 3 September. Yet this was not http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ the reply first planned by George I; when at the beginning of March came to London news of Peter the Great's death and the first surprising intimations of private overtures made by Spain to Austria, negotiations actually in progress between the three powers were allowed to lapse, and a league against Austria was derised which left out Prussia. Later, a new treaty with France was drafted, and this was hurriedly altered to inntuHft at McMaster University Library on July 26, 2015 Prussia, when Frederick William I came to Hanover at the end of July and was found amenablp. At the beginning of the year five foreign negotiations engaged the attention of George I and hi* secretaries of state, Lord Towns- hend and the duke of Newcastle, negotiations * interwoven together', to use Newcastle's phrase,1 and soon to produce a very maze of complication. Firstly, George and Louis XV were posing as joint mediators between Austria and Spain, with the object of completing the settlement of southern Europe on the conditions of the quadruple alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Quellen Und Studien Bd. 18 2005
    Quellen und Studien Bd. 18 2005 Copyright Das Digitalisat wird Ihnen von perspectivia.net, der Online-Publi- kationsplattform der Stiftung Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland (DGIA), zur Verfügung gestellt. Bitte beachten Sie, dass das Digitalisat urheberrechtlich geschützt ist. Erlaubt ist aber das Lesen, das Ausdrucken des Textes, das Herunterladen, das Speichern der Daten auf einem eigenen Datenträger soweit die vorgenannten Handlungen ausschließlich zu privaten und nicht- kommerziellen Zwecken erfolgen. Eine darüber hinausgehende unerlaubte Verwendung, Reproduktion oder Weitergabe einzelner Inhalte oder Bilder können sowohl zivil- als auch strafrechtlich ver- folgt werden. JEREMY BLACK HANOVER/ENGLAND, SAXONY/POLAND. POLITICAL RELATIONS BETWEEN STATES IN THE AGE OF PERSONAL UNION: INTERESTS AND AIMS* We have been long in pursuit of wild chimerical schemes [...] and I believe it mortifies us a little to find that all our projecting yields us no more than our labour for our pains [...] we are under a quack sort of management, and have I fear but little taste or knowledge of other methods, (James Scott, British envoy to Saxony-Poland, reporting from Dresden on Augustus IPs government, 1721).l Personal unions were common in eighteenth-century Europe and present at a number of scales. A list, by no means complete, would include those of Sweden and Hesse-Cassel, Russia and Holstein-Gottorp, and Denmark and Oldenburg, and would also extend to the creation of the kingdom of Sardinia, and to the un­ ion of England and Scotland in 1603-1707. Furthermore, other possible per­ sonal unions were discussed. Any assessment of the situation in Britain-Han­ over and Poland-Saxony should be set within this wider context.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidies, Diplomacy, and State Formation in Europe, 1494–1789: Economies of Allegiance
    SUBSIDIES, DIPLOMACY, AND STATE FORMATION IN EUROPE, 1494–1789: ECONOMIES OF ALLEGIANCE Subsidies, diplomacy, and state formation in Europe, 1494–1789: Economies of allegiance EDITED BY SVANTE NORRHEM AND ERIK THOMSON Lund University Press Copyright © Lund University Press 2020 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Lund University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors, and no chapter may be reproduced wholly or in part without the express permission in writing of both author and publisher. Lund University Press The Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology P.O. Box 117 SE-221 00 LUND Sweden http://lunduniversitypress.lu.se Lund University Press books are published in collaboration with Manchester University Press. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-91-984698-3-7 hardback ISBN 978-91-984698-4-4 open access First published 2020 An electronic version of this book is also available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, thanks to the support of Lund University, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Lund University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. Details of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for any external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • And George II (1727-60)
    Gale Primary Sources Start at the source. The Reigns of George I (1714-27) and George II (1727-60) Professor William Gibson Oxford Brookes University Various source media, State Papers Online EMPOWER™ RESEARCH George I Septennial Act meant elections were held every seven (rather than three) years[6], and steadily Whigs were The death of Queen Anne on 1 August 1714 (os) had the appointed to almost all public offices including the potential to leave a serious power vacuum. Under the magistracy, lords lieutenant, militia and the revenue as Act of Settlement of 1701, her heir was the Elector of [7] well as senior university and church appointments . Hanover, but Anne had refused to permit the presence These measures cemented the Whig dominance and of his family in Britain. It took until 18 September for the Tory marginalisation in politics for decades. George I to make his way to Britain, a delay which was partly due to bad weather. George was also concerned George had spent the first fifty four years of his life in to see whether his succession would be challenged by Hanover, and was keen to return home regularly Queen Anne's Catholic brother who had been excluded through his reign. In 1716, 1720, 1723, 1725, and 1727 by the Act of 1701. Nevertheless provision for the he visited Hanover, again leaving lord justices to continuity of government had been made and seven discharge royal functions in his absence. The operation lord justices were sworn in to discharge the sovereign of the government in the King's absence demonstrated functions until George arrived.[1] In the days after the the resilience of the system of ministerial functions and new king's accession, mayors were alert to the the effectiveness of the various interacting government possibility of unrest and the post was routinely structures including the Privy Council, the cabinet and searched to discover whether Jacobites were plotting a the meetings of lord justices.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms, Annarbor. Michigan4sio6
    76-24,574 CADY, Priscilla Scott, 1925- HORATIO WALPOLE AND THE MAKING OF THE TREATY OF SEVILLE, 1728-1730. The^Ohio State Univeristy, Ph.D. History, modern Xerox University Microfilms, Ann Arbor. Michigan 4sio6 Copyri^t by Priscilla Scott Cady 1976 HORATIO WALPOLE AND THE MAKING OF THE TREATY OF SEVILLE, 1728-1730 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Priscilla Scott Cady, B.S., M.A. The Ohio State University 1976 Reading Committee; Approved By John C, Rule R. Clayton Roberts Phillip P. Poirier Adviser Department of History ACKNOIŒDŒ'IENTS This study would not have been completed had it not been for the assistance and encouragement of many people. It was John C, Rule who suggested this investigation of Horatio Walpole's embassy in Prance and provided guidance during the writing of the dissertation. Eagnhild Hatton was supportive in regard to focusing attention on a significant period of Walpole's embassy. Graham Gibbs' suggestion regarding the Norwich Public Record Office was fruitful in bringing to li^t a collec­ tion of Townshend-Walpole correspondence for 1728. Clayton Roberts was generous in helping a neophyte at the British iîuseum and the London Public Record Office. Last, and far from least, my husband, Henry, and our children have always been ready with a word of encouragement whenever energy flagged. To each I extend sincere appreciation and gratitude. June 24 1 1923 •••••••••• B o m — Malden f Massachusetts 1967* •••••••••••••• B«S.I Sununa Cum Laude, The Ohio State University I Columhus, Ohio 1967-I9Ô8 •••••••••••• English TeacherI Grade 12, Worthington High School, Worthington, Ohio 1968-1970 •••••••••••• M.A,, The Ohio State University, Columhus, Ohio 1968-1973 ••••• ..........
    [Show full text]
  • ICRP Calendar
    The notions of International Relations (IR) in capital letters and international relations (ir) in lowercase letters have two different meanings. The first refers to a scholarly discipline while the second one means a set of contemporary events with historical importance, which influences global-politics. In order to make observations, formulate theories and describe patterns within the framework of ‘IR’, one needs to fully comprehend specific events related to ‘ir’. It is why the Institute for Cultural Relations Policy (ICRP) believes that a timeline on which all the significant events of international relations are identified might be beneficial for students, scholars or professors who deal with International Relations. In the following document all the momentous wars, treaties, pacts and other happenings are enlisted with a monthly division, which had considerable impact on world-politics. January 1745 | Treaty of Warsaw The Treaty of Warsaw was a military pact among Great Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony. This 08 alliance supported Maria Theresa during the War of the Austrian Succession. It was also an anti-France alliance. 1792 | Treaty of Jassy The Treaty of Jassy was a peace agreement between the Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire after the 09 Russo-Turkish War. According to this agreement Russia received important territories and became dominant power at the area of the Black Sea. 1732 | Treaty of Ahmet Pasha The Treaty of Ahmet Pasha was a peace agreement between the Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Persia. The 10 Ottomans and Persians fought between 1723 and 1730 both part was exhausted at the end of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Congress Classification
    KZ LAW OF NATIONS KZ Law of nations Class here works on legal principles recognized by nations, and rules governing conduct of nations and their relations with one another, including supra-regional Intergovernmental Organizations (IGO's) and the legal regimes governing such organizations Class here the sources of international law, i.e. the law of treaties, arbitral awards and judicial decisions of the international courts For organizations with missions limited to a particular region, see the appropriate K subclass for the regional organization (e. g. KJE for the Council of Europe) For works on comparative and uniform law of two or more countries in different regions, and on private international law (Conflict of laws), see subclass K Bibliography For bibliography of special topics, see the topic 2 Bibliography of bibliography 3 General bibliography 4 Library catalogs. Union lists 5 Bibliography of periodicals, society publications, collections, etc. For indexes to a particular publication, see the publication 5.5 Indexes to periodical articles Periodicals For periodical articles consisting primarily of informative material, e. g. news letters, bulletins, etc. relating to a particular subject, see the subject. For collected papers, proceedings, etc. of a particular congress, see the congress. For particular society publications, e. g. directories, see the society For periodicals consisting predominantly of legal articles, regardless of subject matter and jurisdiction see K1+ 21 Annuals. Yearbooks Class here annual publications and surveys on current international law developments and analysis of recent events, including official document collections e. g. Annuaire français de droit international; Asian Yearbook of International Law; British Yearbook of International Law; Jahrbuch für internationales Recht; Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg For annual reports on legal activities of intergovernmental organizations, see the organization (e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-53574-6 440 INDEX
    INDEX A Anglomania, 375, 380 Abreu, Felix Joseph de, 225, 227 Anglophobia, 374–375, 380, Acadia, 139 382–383, 399 Accarias de Sérionne, Jacques, 36, Anjou, Duc d’, see under Philip V, 212, 234, 245, 263 King of Spain See also Choiseul Anna Ioannovna, Russian Act of Settlement (1701), 326 Empress, 192 Adams, John, 212 Anne, Queen of Great Adelman, Jeremy, 403 Britain, 129–130, 132–133, 138, Adriatic, 360, 365–366 152–153, 173 Affry, Louis Auguste, Comte d’, 208 See also Treaty of Asiento; Treaty of Africa, North, 33, 337 Barcelona Agras, Francesco, 361 Annual ship (navío de permiso), and Alberoni, Giulio, 177, 179–181 British contraband, 25–26, 154, Alcabala (alcavala) sales tax, 162 156–158, 160–161 Alekseev, Ivan Ivanovic, 191 See also Treaty of Utrecht, Spain- Alembert, Jean-Baptiste Le Rond Great Britain, commerce d’, 231 (1713); Treaty of Madrid, Almansa, Battle of (1707), 152 Spain-Britain (1750) Amelot de Chaillou, Jean-Jacques, 250 Antilles, 165, 409 America, trade, North, 181 Anti-Machiavel, and Prussian Spanish (see under Spain) reform, 282, 296–301, 303–304 See also United States See also Frederick II; Voltaire Ammon, Christoph Heinrich von, 311 Antin, Antoine François de Pardaillan Amor de Soria, Juan, 165 de Gondrin, Marquis d’, 251 Amsterdam, 186, 188, 203, 210, 213, Antwerp, 198, 319, 364 311, 319, 341, 366 Aosta, duchy of, 321 © The Author(s) 2017 439 A. Alimento, K. Stapelbroek (eds.), The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-53574-6 440 INDEX Arcot, 271, 285 French-Austrian
    [Show full text]
  • GIPE-002927.Pdf
    .:JTordgn ~tatt.5mnt MARIA THERESA MARIA THERESA BY REv. J. FRANCK BRIGHT, D.D. llASTEB. OF tJNIVEBSITY OOLLEG£1 OXFORD 1Lonbon MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1897 .AU rights resert:td PREFATORY NOTE THE subject of this monograph, the political work of Maria. rheresa, runs over into a second volume, which will appear under ,the title of "Joseph II." Perhaps a few w~rds are necessary to explain this departure from the' general plan ~f the series. Its justification depends on the close continuity between the two reigns. For fifteen years Joseph was associated with his mother as co-regent; and during that· time his influence was . constantly increasing. To attempt an account of her political action, with~mt taking into consideration the character and views of her son, would involve a wholly inadequate treatment. The reign of Joseph, when left as sole ruler of the empire, was but a working out and fulfilment of the initiatory measures of the preceding reign. Over almost the whole period, in foreign affairs at all events, the influence of one minister, Kaunitz, is predominant ; in fact the two reigns are occupied with the rise and fall of his political system. They stand by themselves as an episode in European history. vi MARIA THERESA Whatever political connections were subsequently con­ tracted were subjected to the new and overwhelming forces called into life by the French Revolution. The. same continuity is visible in the internal policy of the two sovereigns. Again the period has a unity of its I owri, in the great effort of monarchical institutions to justify themselves and to satisfy without ClOnstitutional upheaval the requirements of a new and progressive age.
    [Show full text]