1/19/2005 Dynalantic Amicus Brief
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DYNALANTIC CORP. Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ACTION NO. 95-2301 (EGS) DEFENSE, et al., Defendants. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THEODORE M. SHAW LESLIE PROLL Director-Counsel (D.C. Bar No. 467917) JACQUELINE BERRIEN NORMAN J. CHACHKIN NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & (D.C. Bar No. 235283) EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 1444 Eye Street, N.W., 10th Fl. ELISE BODDIE Washington, D.C. 20005 ROBERT STROUP (202) 682-1300 Phone ANURIMA BHARGAVA (202) 682-1312 Fax MELANCA CLARK NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 New York, New York 10013 (212) 965-2200 Phone (212) 226-7592 Fax Attorneys for Amicus Curiae January 19, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Authorities ........................................................... ii Interest of Amicus ..............................................................1 ARGUMENT.................................................................1 Introduction and Summary.................................................1 I. AN ARRAY OF FEDERAL POLICIES AND PROGRAMS HAVE INHIBITED THE ACQUISITION OF CAPITAL IN AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITIES, THEREBY PREVENTING THE FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN OWNED BUSINESSES THAT ARE POSITIONED TO COMPETE FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS. .........................................................3 II. THE SUPREME COURT’S RECENT LANDMARK DECISION IN GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER PROVIDES FURTHER SUPPORT FOR THE CONCLUSION THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS A COMPELLING INTEREST IN USING THE SECTION 8(a) PROGRAM TO ELIMINATE DISCRIMINATORY BARRIERS THAT IMPEDE MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT. 10 A. By Breaking Down Longstanding Discriminatory Barriers to Business Development, the Section 8(a) and DoD Programs Provide Critical Opportunities for Disadvantaged Minority Entrepreneurs to Develop Skills Needed to Contribute to the Nation’s Economic Vitality and Civic Life. 12 B. Public Institutions Must Be Open And Accessible To Support Democratic Legitimacy In A Multicultural Society. 19 III. THE BURDEN IMPOSED BY THE SECTION 8(A) AND DoD PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS IS MINIMAL AND DIFFUSE..................................23 CONCLUSION ..............................................................25 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Adarand Construction Inc. v. Slater, 228 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000) .............................................4 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).................................................2, 5, 11 Builders Ass'n of Greater Chicago v. City of Chicago, 298 F.Supp.2d 725 (N.D.Ill. 2003) .........................................11 Chisholm v. U.S. Postal Service, 665 F.2d 482 (4th Cir. 1981) ...............................................8 City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989)..............................................4, 5, 15, 24 The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883)........................................................5 Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857) ..............................................5 Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980)......................................................8 Gautreaux v. Romney, 448 F.2d 731 (7th Cir. 1971) ...............................................6 Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003).....................................................10 Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003)................................................. passim Hazelwood Sch. District v. United States., 433 U.S. 299 (1977)......................................................3 Hills v. Gautreaux, 425 U.S. 284 (1976)......................................................6 Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987) ....................................................24 iii Luevano v. Campbell, 93 F.R.D. 68 (D.D.C. 1981)................................................8 NAACP v. Brennan, 360 F.Supp. 1006 (D.D.C. 1973)............................................7 Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 358 F.3d 599 (9th Cir. 2004) ..............................................11 Petit v. City of Chicago, 352 F.3d 1111 (7th Cir. 2003) .............................................11 Pigford v. Glickman, 185 F.R.D. 82 (D.D.C. 1999)...............................................7 Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)......................................................5 Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 539 (1842) ...............................................5 Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996).....................................................20 Rothe Development Corp. v. U.S. Department of Defense, 324 F. Supp. 2d 840 (W.D. Tex. 2004) ...................................11, 14 Sherbrooke Turf, Inc. v. Minn. Department of Transport, 345 F.3d 964 (8th Cir. 2003) ...............................................4 Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950).....................................................11 Thompson v. U.S. Dep't of Housing & Urban Development, No. CIV.A.MJG-95-309, 2005 WL 27533 (D.Md. Jan. 6, 2005) . 6 U.S. v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149 (1987).....................................................23 United Steelworkers of America v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (1979)...................................................7, 23 Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 476 U.S. 267 (1986)...................................................4, 24 iv STATUTES AND REGULATIONS §13 C.F.R. 124.309 ...........................................................23 Exec. Order No. 9981, 13 Fed. Reg. 4313 (July 26, 1948) . 9 Morrill Act, ch. 841, § 1, 26 Stat. 417, 418 (1890) . 5 Hill-Burton Hospital Survey and Construction Act, Pub. L. No. 79-725, §622(f)(1), 60 Stat. 1040 (1946) . 5 15 U.S.C. § 631(a) ............................................................13 15 U.S.C. §§636(j)(16)(B)(ii) ...................................................15 15 U.S.C. §§ 636(j)16(A) & (B) .................................................15 OTHER AUTHORITIES AFRICAN AMERICANS AND THE LIVING CONSTITUTION (John Hope Franklin & Genna Rae McNeil eds., 1995).......................................................5 MILDRED L. AMER, CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, MEMBERSHIP OF THE 109TH CONGRESS: A PROFILE (2004) ............................................18 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF FUNDRAISING COUNSEL, TRUST FOR PHILANTHROPY, GIVING USA 2004 ......................................................18 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FY 2005 (2004) ...............................15 Elizabeth S. Anderson, Racial Integration as a Compelling Interest, 21 Const. Commentary 15 (2004) ..........................................11 Timothy Bates, Commercial Bank Financing of White- and Black-Owned Small Business Start-ups, 31 Q. Rev. of Econ. & Bus., No. 1, 64 (1991) . 9 David Bernstein, The Davis-Bacon Act: Vestige of Jim Crow, 13 Nat'l Black L.J. 276 (1994) . 7 Brief of Amicus Curiae, General Motors Corp., Grutter (No. 02-241) .................17, 19 Brief of Amicus Curiae National Education Association et. al., Grutter (No. 02-241) . 16 Brief of Amici Curiae Julius W. Becton et al, Grutter (No. 02-241)....................9, 19 v Brief of Amici Curiae United States, Grutter (No. 02-241) ............................19 Brief of Amici Curiae 65 Leading American Businesses, Grutter (No. 02-241).............17 Brief of Amicus Curiae United States, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (No. 1) ...................................................................21 Kenneth Bredemeier, Thousands of Private Contractors Support U.S. Forces in Persian Gulf, WASH. POST, Mar. 3, 2002................................................22 Andrew Brimmer, Economic Cost of Discrimination Against Black Americans, in ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (Margaret Simms ed., 1995). 17 The Compelling Interest for Affirmative Action in Federal Procurement: A Preliminary Survey, 61 Fed. Reg. 26042 (May 25, 1996) ...................................5 Tam Cummings, Military Couple Relives POW Experience from Both Sides, in DEFEND AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NEWS ABOUT THE WAR ON TERRORISM (Apr. 23, 2004), .............................................................22 Defendant’s Mem of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment .................................................2, 3, 5, 16, 23, 24 Department of Defense: Federal Programs to Promote Minority Business Development: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Minority Enter., Fin.& Urban Dev. of the House Comm. on Small Bus., 103d Cong. (1993) . 8 Jared Diamond, The Ends of the World As We Know Them, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 1, 2005 . 20 MARY L. DUDZIAK, COLD WAR CIVIL RIGHTS 254 (2000) .............................21 Cynthia Estlund, Taking Grutter to Work, 7 Green Bag 2d 215 (2004) . 11 CYNTHIA ESTLUND, WORKING TOGETHER (2003)....................................18 THE FEDERALIST NO. 39, at 251 (James Madison) (Jacob E. Cooke ed., 1961) . 20 DON H. FEHRENBACHER, THE SLAVEHOLDING REPUBLIC: AN ACCOUNT OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT’S RELATIONS TO SLAVERY (2001) ...............................5 Joshua B. Freeman, Hardhats: Construction Workers, Manliness and the 1970 Pro-War Demonstrations, 26 J. of Soc. Hist. 737 (1993).................................7 Hamida Ghafour, Afghans are Fed Up with Security Firm, L.A. TIMES, Sept. 27, 2004 . 22 vi LINDA S. GREENE, THE CONSTITUTION AND RACIAL EQUALITY