DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Adare, V. (1976). Experiences in Spiritualism with Mr. D.D. Home . New York: Arno Press. Achinstein, P. (1983). The Nature of Explanation . New York: Oxford University Press. Achinstein, P. (2001). The Book of Evidence . New York: Oxford University Press. Alexander, E. (2012). Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon’s Journey into the Afterlife . New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Allison, L.W. (1934). “Proxy Sittings with Mrs. Leonard.” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research 21: 104–45. Almeder, R. (1992). Death and Personal Survival . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Almeder, R. (1996a). “Recent Responses to Survival Research.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 10: 495–517. Almeder, R. (1996b). “Almeder’s Reply to Wheatley and Braude.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 10: 529–33. Almeder, R. (1997). “A Critique of Arguments Offered against Reincarnation.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 11: 499–526. Almeder, R. (2001). “On Reincarnation: A Rely to Hales.” Philosophia 28: 347–58. Almeder, R. (2012). “The Major Objections from Reductive Materialism Against Belief in the Existence of a Cartesian Mind-Body Dualism.” In A. Moreira-Almeida and F.S. Santos (eds.), Exploring Frontiers of Mind-Brain Relationship . New York: Springer, 17–33. Alvarado, C. (1989). “Trends in the Study of Out-of-Body Experiences: An Overview of Developments since the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 3: 27–42. Alvarado, C. (2000). “Out-of-Body Experiences.” In E. Cardena, S.J. Lynn, and S. Krippner (eds.), Varieties of Anomalous Experience: Examining the Scientific Evidence . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 183–218. Alvarado, C. and Martinez-Taboas, A. (1983). “The Super-Psi Hypothesis: A Review.” Theta 11 (3): 57–62. Angel, L. (1994). “Empirical Evidence of Reincarnation? Examining Stevenson’s ‘Most Impressive’ Case.” Skeptical Inquirer 18: 481–7. Ara, M. (2008). Eschatology in the Indo-Iranian Traditions: The Genesis and Transformation of a Doctrine . New York: Peter Lang Publishing. Augustine, K. (2008). “Hallucinatory Near-Death Experiences.” Retrieved November 22, 2014, from < http://infidels.org/library/modern/keith_augustine/HNDEs. html >. Aurobindo, S. (1998) . Essays in Philosophy and Yoga . In Collected Works of Sri Aurobindo, Volume 13 . Pondicherry, India: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust. Aurobindo, S. (2002). Our Many Selves, Practical Yoga Psychology: Selections from the Works of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother , compiled by A.S. Dalal. Twin Lakes, WI: Lotus Press. Ayer, A.J. (1956). The Problem of Knowledge . London: Macmillan. Ayer, A.J. (1963). The Concept of a Person and Other Essays . London: Macmillan. Badham, P. and Badham, L. (1982). Immortality or Extinction? Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books. 308 Bibliography 309 Badham, P. and Badham, L. (eds.) (1987). Death and Immortality in the Religions of the World . New York: Paragon House. Baker, L.R. (1995). “Need a Christian be a Mind/Body Dualist?” Faith and Philosophy 12: 489–594. Baker, L.R. (2001). “Material Persons and the Doctrine of Resurrection.” Faith and Philosophy 18: 151–67. Baker, L.R. (2004a). “Christians Should Reject Mind-Body Dualism.” In M.L. Peterson and R.J. Vanarragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 327–38. Baker, L.R. (2004b). “Reply to Zimmerman.” In M.L. Peterson and R.J. Vanarragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 341–3. Baker, L.R. (2005). “Death and the Afterlife.” In W. Wainwright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Religion . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 366–91. Baker, M.C. and Goetz, S. (eds.) (2011). The Soul Hypothesis: Investigations into the Existence of the Soul . New York: Continuum. Barrett, W. (1926). Death-Bed Visions . London: Methuen. Batcheldor, K. (1966). “Report on a Case of Table Levitation and Associated Phenomena.” British Journal of the Society for Psychical Research 43: 339–356. Batcheldor, K. (1984). “Contributions to the Theory of PK Induction from Sitter- Group Work.” Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 78: 105–122. Bayless, R. (1971). The Other Side of Death: Is Survival of Death Possible? New Hyde Park, NY: University Books. Beahrs, J.O. (1982). Unity and Multiplicity: Multilevel Consciousness of Self in Hypnosis, Psychiatric Disorder and Mental Health . New York: Brunner/Mazel Publishers. Becker, C. (1993). Paranormal Experience and Survival of Death . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Beischel, J. (2007). “Contemporary methods used in laboratory-based mediumship research.” The Journal of Parapsychology 71: 37−68. Beischel, J. (2013). “Advances in Quantitative Mediumship Research” in the Rock collection, pp. 177−95. Beischel, J. and Schwartz, G.E. (2007). “Anomalous Information Reception by Research Mediums Demonstrated Using a Novel Triple-Blind Protocol.” Explore 3: 23–7. Bem, D.J. and Honorton, C. (1994). “Does Psi Exist? Replicable Evidence for an Anomalous Process of Information Transfer.” Psychological Bulletin 115: 4–18. Berger, A.S. (1987). “A Critical Outline of the Prima Facie Evidence for Survival.” In Paul Badham and Linda Badham (eds.), Death and Immortality in the Religions of the World . New York: Paragon House, 188–213. Blackmore, S. (1982). Beyond the Body: An Investigation of Out-of-Body Experiences . Chicago: Academy Chicago Publishers. Blackmore, S. (1993). Dying to Live: Near-Death Experiences . New York: Prometheus Books. Blackmore, S. (1996). “Near-Death Experiences.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 89: 73–6. Bliss, E.L. (1986). Multiple Personality, Allied Disorders and Hypnosis. New York: Oxford University Press. Bradley, F.H. (1964 (Orig. 1885)). “What Spiritualist Evidence Does Not Establish.” In Antony Flew (ed.) Body, Mind, and Death . New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 212–20. 310 Bibliography Braude, S. (1992). “Reply to Stevenson.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 6 (2): 151–5. Braude, S. (1995). First-Person Plural: Multiple Personality and the Philosophy of Mind . Rev. Ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Braude, S. (1997). The Limits of Influence: Psychokinesis and the Philosophy of Science . Rev. Ed. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Braude, S. (2002). ESP and Psychokinesis: A Philosophical Examination . Rev. Ed. Parkland: Brown Walker Press. Braude, S. (2003). Immortal Remains: the Evidence for Life after Death . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Braude, S. (2005). “Personal Identity and Postmortem Survival.” Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2): 226–249. Reprinted in E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller, and J. Paul (eds.), (2005). Personal Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 226–49. Braude, S. (2009). “Perspectival Awareness and Postmortem Survival.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 23: 195–210. Braude, S. (2013). “The Possibility of Mediumship: Philosophical Considerations.” In A. Rock (ed.), The Survival Hypothesis: Essays on Mediumship . Jefferson, MD: McFarland, 21–39. Broad, C.D. (1918). “In What Sense is Survival Desirable?” The Hibbert Journal 17: 7–20. Broad, C.D. (1919). “The Antecedent Probability of Survival.” The Hibbert Journal 17: 561–78. Broad, C.D. (1960 (Orig. 1925)). The Mind and Its Place in Nature . Paterson, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, & Company. Broad, C.D. (1962). Lectures on Psychical Research . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Bynum, C.W. (1995). The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity: 200 – 1336 . New York: Columbia University Press. Carnap, R. (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Carrington, H. (1909). Eusapia Palladino and Her Phenomena . New York: B.W. Dodge and Company. Carrington, H. (1919). Modern Psychical Phenomena: Recent Researches and Speculations . London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, & Co., LTD. Carr, D. (1981). “Endorphins at the Approach of Death.” Lancet 1: 390. Carter, C. (2012). Science and the Afterlife Experience: Evidence for the Immortality of Consciousness . Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions. Chandler, J. and Harrison, V. (eds.) (2012). Probability in the Philosophy of Religion . New York: Oxford University Press. Chari, C.T.K. (1961–62a). “Parapsychology and ‘reincarnation.’ Part 1. Indian Journal of Parapsychology 3 (1): 20–31. Chari, C.T.K. (1961–62b). “Parapsychology and ‘reincarnation.’ Part 2: ‘Reincarnation’ or ‘spirit possession’?” Indian Journal of Parapsychology 3 (2): 12–21. Chari, C.T.K. (1962a). “‘Buried Memories’ in Survival Research.” International Journal of Parapsychology 4: 40–62. Chari, C.T.K. (1962b). “Paramnesia and Reincarnation.” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research 53: 264–86. Chari, C.T.K. (1962c). “Paranormal Cognition, Survival, and Reincarnation.” Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 61: 158–83. Chari, C.T.K. (1967). “Reincarnation: New light on an Old Doctrine.” International Journal of Parapsychology 9: 217–22. Bibliography 311 Chari, C.T.K. (1978). “Reincarnation Research and Method.” In M. Ebon (ed.), The Signet Handbook of Parapsychology . New York: New American Library, 313–24. Chaudhuri, H. (1954). The Philosophy of Integralism, or the Mystical Synthesis Inherent in the Teaching of Sri Aurobindo . Calcutta: Sri Aurobindo Pathamandir. Cherry, C. (1986). “Near-Death Experiences and the Problem of Evidence for Survival after Death.” Religious Studies 22 (3/4): 397–406. Cockburn, D. (1991). “The Evidence for Reincarnation.” Religious Studies 27: 199–207. Collins, J. (1957). “Divine Preservation of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Beginner's Guide to 'Holistic' Wellness
    BOOK REVIEWS in the progression of the disease when The Beginner’s Guide to prayer was used” (p. 98). For such a bold statement, the evidence is pretty weak, ‘Holistic’ Wellness however. There are very few studies on DIMITRY ROTSTEIN personal prayer (none are double-blind, of course), and their results are mixed Mayo Clinic Book of Alternative Medicine. By The Mayo even for treating purely psychological Clinic. Time Inc. Home Entertainment Books, New York, symptoms. More disturbing is the fact 2007. ISBN: 1-933405-92-9. 192 pp. Hardcover, $24.95. that the book doesn’t make a distinc- tion between personal and intercessory prayer, even though the latter is known to have no effect according to well-de- he Mayo Clinic Book of mean that perhaps we skeptics have signed studies (including one by the Alterna tive Medicine is the been unfair to “alternative medicine” Mayo Clinic itself). None of these facts most significant publication of and that there is more to it than just T is ever mentioned. In summary, the evi- the Mayo Clinic Complementary and placebo, self-delusion, quackery, or, at dence of the effectiveness of these “ther- Integrative Medicine Program’s team, best, some outdated healing techniques? apies” against any real disease is either which has been studying various forms Perhaps not. dubious or non-existent. Of course, of complementary and alternative medi- True, of the twenty-five CAM ther- controlling such factors as stress and cine (CAM, for short) since 2001. Here apies, fourteen are recommended as depression is important for your health, you will find nothing but reliable and safe and effective for “treating” various but there is no indication that any of the easy-to-understand information from diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Security in the Mystical the Function of Paranormal Beliefs
    Searching for Security in the Mystical The Function of Paranormal Beliefs MARTIN R. GRIMMER ver the past two decades, the paranor- mal has enjoyed something of a revival Owithin popular culture. There have been countless books, magazine and newspaper articles, movies, and television programs devoted to topics ranging from UFOs, the Bermuda Triangle, lost continents, Yetis, and Belief in the the Loch Ness monster, to pyramid power, astrology, levitation, telepathy, precognition, paranormal and poltergeists. Sociologist Marcello Truzzi appears to satisfy (1972) suggested that this boom in paranormal interest began around the late sixties, noting some very basic, if that Ouija boards outsold such popular board inconsistent games as Monopoly. human needs. It Lately, the paranormal seems to have mani- fested in the form of the New Age movement— will probably a loose combination of ideas encompassing spir- remain with us itualism, mysticism, alternative healing, and a healthy dose of commercialism. Some may think forever. this is mainly an American phenomenon, but it is estimated that Australians alone now spend $100 million a year on personal-transformation courses that delve deeply into such fringe areas as rebirthing, shamanism, channeling, and crystal healing. To some observers, the New Age movement is seen as a sort of quasi-religious justification for "yuppiedom"—how to make money and feel "really great" about it at the same time. Winter 1992 Research studies worldwide have written on this topic, several themes revealed an extensive belief in and in the human motive to believe can acceptance of the paranormal. In a be identified. survey of the readers of Britain's New First, paranormal beliefs may oper- Scientist magazine, a high proportion ate to reassure the believer that there of whom are reported to hold post- is order and control in what may graduate degrees, Evans (1973) found otherwise appear to be a chaotic that 67 percent believed that ESP was universe (Frank 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • The Pseudoscience of Anti-Anti-Ufology
    SI Sept/Oct 2009 pgs 7/29/09 11:24 AM Page 28 PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS ROBERT SHEAFFER The Pseudoscience of Anti-Anti-UFOlogy Many readers are surely familiar with is more their style. Deception is the practiced prestidigitation can never be author and pro-UFO lecturer Stanton T. name of the game.” trusted in anything. He criticizes Friedman, who calls himself the “Flying Friedman goes on to name names: Nickell for raising “the baseless Project Saucer physicist” because he actually did He critiques Joe Nickell’s article “Return Mogul explanation” for Roswell, which work in physics about fifty years ago (al- cannot be correct, says Friedman, though not since). Well, Stanton is upset because it does not match the claims by the skeptical writings contained in made in later years by alleged Roswell SI’s special issue on UFOs (January- witnesses (although it does match quite /February 2009) and elsewhere. He has well the account of Mac Brazel, the orig- written two papers thus far denouncing inal witness, given in 1947). us, and it is the subject of his Keynote He moves on to my critique of the Address at the MUFON Conference in Betty and Barney Hill case, where I note August. the resemblance of their “hypnosis UFO In February, Friedman wrote an arti- testimony” to Betty Hill’s post-incident cle, “Debunkers at it Again,” reviewing dreams. I wrote, “Barney had heard her our UFO special issue (www.theufo repeat [them] many times,” which he chronicles.com/2009/02/debunkers-at- claims is “nonsense.” According to it-again.html).
    [Show full text]
  • SKEPTICAL INQUIRER Vol
    SKEPTICAL INQUIRER Vol. 18. No. 4 THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER is the official journal of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, an international organization. Editor Kendrick Frazier. Editorial Board James E. Alcock, Barry Beyerstein, Susan J. Blackmore, Martin Gardner, Ray Hyman, Philip J. Klass, Paul Kurtz, Joe Nickell, Lee Nisbet, Bela Scheiber. Consulting Editors Robert A. Baker, William Sims Bainbridge, John R. Cole, Kenneth L. Feder, C. E. M. Hansel, E. C. Krupp, David F. Marks, Andrew Neher, James E. Oberg, Robert Sheaffer, Steven N. Shore. Managing Editor Doris Hawley Doyle. Contributing Editor Lys Ann Shore. Writer Intern Thomas C. Genoni, Jr. Cartoonist Rob Pudim. Business Manager Mary Rose Hays. Assistant Business Manager Sandra Lesniak. Chief Data Officer Richard Seymour. Fulfillment Manager Michael Cione. Production Paul E. Loynes. Art Linda Hays. Audio Technician Vance Vigrass. Librarian Jonathan Jiras. Staff Alfreda Pidgeon, Etienne C. Rios, Ranjit Sandhu, Sharon Sikora, Elizabeth Begley (Albuquerque). The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy, State University of New York at Buffalo. Barry Karr, Executive Director and Public Relations Director. Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director. Fellows of the Committee James E. Alcock,* psychologist, York Univ., Toronto; Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky; Stephen Barrett, M.D., psychiatrist, author, consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa. Barry Beyerstein,* biopsychologist, Simon Fraser Univ., Vancouver, B.C., Canada; Irving Biederman, psychologist, Univ. of Southern California; Susan Blackmore,* psychologist, Univ. of the West of England, Bristol; Henri Broch, physicist, Univ. of Nice, France; Jan Harold Brunvand, folklorist, professor of English, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Video Games: Dogma, Fear, and Pseudoscience
    SI Sept/Oct 2009 pgs 7/22/09 2:33 PM Page 38 Violent Video Games: Dogma, Fear, and Pseudoscience Video games are at the center of a modern media-based moral panic. Too often, social scientists have fueled the flames and eschewed good scientific practices. CHRISTOPHER J. FERGUSON chool shootings at high schools and universities are rare but shocking events. Across the last decade or so Swe have come to understand a little about the psychol- ogy of the young men who carry out such horrific crimes. Most typically they are emotionally disturbed, often de- pressed, feel socially isolated and alienated from society, and are filled with rage and hatred. It is natural for society to want easy answers about how such a phenomenon can be controlled. Social scientists want to give those answers. Unfortunately, the human inclination to believe we can pre- dict the unpredictable and control the uncontrollable often leads us to mask the language of fear and irrationality in the language of science. 38 Volume 33, Issue 5 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER SI Sept/Oct 2009 pgs 7/22/09 2:33 PM Page 39 In the case of school shootings and youth violence in gen- son and David Grossman might be forgiven for inflaming fears eral, some scientists have answered the public demand for a with exaggerated claims. Grossman, for instance, has promul- culprit. The alleged corrupting influence of violent video gated the false notion that the military uses video games to games has been identified by some as one root cause. Ignoring desensitize soldiers to killing (they do use simulators for visual the youth-violence data, ignoring inconsistent data from mul- scanning and reaction time and vehicle training, but they seem tiple studies, even ignoring contradictory data from their own more effective in reducing accidental shootings than anything studies, some social scientists have presented the research on else).
    [Show full text]
  • SKEPTICAL INQUIRER Vol
    SKEPTICAL INQUIRER Vol. 1818,, No . 2No. 2 ^^ Winter 1994 Winter / 1994/$6.2$6.255 Paul Kurtz William Grey THE NEW THE PROBLEM SKEPTICISM OF 'PSI' Cancer Scares i*5"***-"" —-^ 44 "74 47CT8 3575" 5 THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER is the official journal of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, an international organization. Editor Kendrick Frazier. Editorial Board James E. Alcock, Barry Beyerstein, Susan J. Blackmore, Martin Gardner, Ray Hyman, Philip J. Klass, Paul Kurtz, Joe Nickell, Lee Nisbet, Bela Scheiber. Consulting Editors Robert A. Baker, William Sims Bainbridge, John R. Cole, Kenneth L. Feder, C. E. M. Hansel, E. C. Krupp, David F. Marks, Andrew Neher, James E. Oberg, Robert Sheaffer, Steven N. Shore. Managing Editor Doris Hawley Doyle. Contributing Editor Lys Ann Shore. Business Manager Mary Rose Hays. Assistant Business Manager Sandra Lesniak. Chief Data Officer Richard Seymour. Computer Assistant Michael Cione. Production Paul E. Loynes. Asst. Managing Editor Cynthia Matheis. Art Linda Hays. Audio Technician Vance Vigrass. Librarian Jonathan Jiras. Staff Alfreda Pidgeon, Ranjit Sandhu, Sharon Sikora, Elizabeth Begley (Albuquerque). Cartoonist Rob Pudim. The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy, State University of New York at Buffalo. Barry Karr, Executive Director and Public Relations Director. Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director. Fellows of the Committee James E. Alcock,* psychologist, York Univ., Toronto; Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky; Stephen Barrett, M.D., psychiatrist, "author, consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa. Barry Beyerstein,* biopsychologist, Simon Fraser Univ., Vancouver, B.C., Canada; Irving Biederman, psychologist, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Skep Ti Cal in Quir Er™ the MAG a ZINE for SCI ENCE and REA SON 44 Doctor-Bashing Arguments EDI TOR Kend Rick Fra Zi Er EDI to RI AL BOARD James E
    [ FROM THE EDITOR Skep ti cal In quir er™ THE MAG A ZINE FOR SCI ENCE AND REA SON 44 Doctor-Bashing Arguments ED I TOR Kend rick Fra zi er ED I TO RI AL BOARD James E. Al cock, Harriet Hall, Ray Hy man, Scott O. Lilienfeld, . and Harriet Hall’s Rebuttals Elizabeth Loftus, Joe Nickell, Steven Novella, Am ar deo Sar ma, Eugenie C. Scott, Karen Stollznow, David E. Thomas, ou’ve heard the arguments: “Doctors only treat symptoms, not the underlying Leonard Tramiel cause of disease.” “You are just supporting the party line of mainstream medi- CON SULT ING ED I TORS Sus an J. Black more, Ken neth L. Fed er, Barry Karr, E.C. Krupp, Ycine.” “Doctors don’t do prevention.” “Alternative medicine is better because it’s Jay M. Pasachoff, Rich ard Wis e man holistic.” “It’s natural, therefore it’s safe.” “We have plenty of testimonials.” CON TRIB UT ING ED I TORS D.J. Grothe, Harriet Hall, Kenneth W. Krause, David Morrison, James E. Enthusiasts for so-called alternative medicine are fond of hurling these Oberg, Massimo Pigliucci, Rob ert Sheaf fer, David and other doctor-bashing arguments back at physicians and others who have E. Thomas the temerity to question their untested alternative remedies and fads. All phy- DEPUTY ED I TOR Ben ja min Rad ford Julia Lavarnway sicians, especially those who publicly defend science-based medicine, have MAN A GING ED I TOR ART DI RECT OR Chri sto pher Fix found themselves on the receiving end of such insults to themselves and their PRO DUC TION Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Examples of Pseudoscience
    Four Examples of Pseudoscience Marcos Villavicencio Tenerife, Canarias, Spain E-mail address: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6700-4872 January 2020 Abstract A relevant issue in the philosophy of science is the demarcation problem: how to distinguish science from nonscience, and, more specifically, science from pseudoscience. Sometimes, the demarcation problem is debated from a very general perspective, proposing demarcation criteria to separate science from pseudoscience, but without discussing any specific field in detail. This article aims to focus the demarcation problem on particular disciplines or theories. After considering a set of demarcation criteria, four pseudosciences are examined: psychoanalysis, speculative evolutionary psychology, universal grammar, and string theory. It is concluded that these theoretical frameworks do not meet the requirements to be considered genuinely scientific. Keywords Demarcation Problem · Pseudoscience · Psychoanalysis · Evolutionary psychology · Universal grammar · String theory 1 Introduction The demarcation problem is the issue of how to differentiate science from nonscience in general and pseudoscience in particular. Even though expressions such as “demarcation problem” or “pseudoscience” were still not used, some consider that an early interest for demarcation existed as far back as the time of ancient Greece, when Aristotle separated episteme (scientific knowledge) from mere doxa (opinion), holding that apodictic certainty is the basis of science (Laudan 1983, p. 112). Nowadays, the issue of demarcation continues being discussed. Certainly, demarcating science from pseudoscience is not a topic of exclusive philosophical interest. Scientists and members of skeptical organizations such as the Committee for Scientific Inquiry also deal with this crucial theme. The issue of how to recognize pseudoscience not only affects academia.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurturing Non-Science
    Nurturing Non-Science Startling Concepts in the Education of Physicians Early in its history, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine awarded grants to incorporate CAM information into traditional medical school curricula. Have these grants had a positive effect on public health? Eugenie V. Mielczarek and Brian D. Engler magine if departments of physics, chemistry, and biol- at many institutions that evolved into CAM training or curriculum awards. ogy of our most prestigious universities offered courses An examination of the first seven years, Iin astrology, crystal-ball gazing, alchemy, and creation- 1993–2000, a detailed review (Green ism. And imagine if these endeavors were funded by the 2001), listed twenty-eight grants of National Science Foundation (NSF) and if the head of which twelve were for specialty centers. NIH’s earliest awardees that tran- NSF appeared at an international conference celebrat- sitioned from specialty awards to cur- ing these endeavors. Would there be an outcry from riculum development were Bastyr Na- the science community? If you answered yes, then you turopathic College, Palmer College of Chiropractic, and Oregon College must be unaware that the paradigm for this is already of Oriental Medicine, an acupuncture in place and there has been no outcry. Since 1998, $76 college (http://xnet.kp.org/permanen- . million in grants for courses and training in non-science tejournal/fall02/editorial.html) These organizations train practitioners who based medical protocols such as acupuncture, magnets, believe they can heal medical problems Reiki, Therapeutic Touch, Qigong, mind-body myths, with non-science based protocols. naturopathic treatments, and Vedic medicine have been This substantial fiduciary encourage- ment of non-science, non-evidence-based funded by the National Institutes velopment with its awards for several curriculum by NCCAM, NIH’s untested of Health (NIH), the federal agency alternative medicine protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeptical Inquirer
    the Skeptical Inquirer THE NEUROPATHOLOGY OF SPIRITUAL POSSESSION ^ Alien Abductions: Psychology & Folklore The MJ-12 Documents: Part II Homeopathy Clinic / Test of Sheldrake Abigail's Apparition / Ghost Lights VOL XII NO. 3 / SPRING 1988 $6.00 Published by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal "Skeptical Inquirer THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER is the official journal of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. Editor Kendrick Frazier. Editorial Board James E. Alcock, Martin Gardner, Ray Hyman, Philip J. (Class, Paul Kurtz, James Randi. Consulting Editors Isaac Asimov, William Sims Bainbridge, John R. Cole, Kenneth L. Feder, C. E. M. Hansel, E. C. Krupp, David F. Marks, Andrew Neher, James E. Oberg, Robert Sheaffer, Steven N. Shore. Managing Editor Doris Hawley Doyle. Public Relations Director Barry Karr. Business Manager Mary Rose Hays. Systems Programmer Richard Seymour. Art Kathy Kostek Typesetting Paul E. Loynes. Audio Technician Vance Vigrass. Librarian, Ranjit Sandhu. Staff Michael Cione, Donald Crutchfield, Crystal Folts, Leland Harrington, Laura Muench, Erin O'Hare, Alfreda Pidgeon, Kathy Reeves. Cartoonist Rob Pudim. The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal Paul Kurtz, Chairman; philosopher, State University of New York at Buffalo. Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director. Mark Plummer, Executive Director. Fellows of the Committee James E. Alcock, psychologist, York Univ., Toronto; Eduardo Amaldi, physicist. University of Rome, Italy. Isaac Asimov, biochemist, author; Irving Biederman, psychologist, University of Minnesota; Susan Blackmore, psycholo­ gist, Brain Perception Laboratory, University of Bristol, England; Brand Blanshard, philosopher, Yale; Mario Bunge, philosopher, McGill University; Bette Chambers, A.H.A.; John R.
    [Show full text]
  • War of the Weasels an Evolutionary Algorithm Beats Intelligent Design
    War of the Weasels An Evolutionary Algorithm Beats Intelligent Design How an intelligent design theorist was bested in a public math competition by a genetic algorithm—a computer simulation of evolution. DAVE THOMAS n the summer of 2006, a different kind of war was waged on the Internet—a war between computer programs writ - Iten by both evolutionary scientists and by intelligent design (ID) advocates. The war came to a climax in a public math competition in which dozens of humans stepped for - ward to compete against each other and against genetic (“evo - lutionary”) computer algorithms. The results were stunning: The official representative of the intelligent design commu - nity was outperformed by an evolutionary algorithm, thus learning Orgel’s Second Law—“Evolution is smarter than you are”—the hard way. In addition, the same IDer’s attempt to make a genetic algorithm that achieved a specific target without “specification” of that target was publicly exposed as 42 Volume 34, Issue 3 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER a rudimentary sham. And finally, two pillars of ID theory, get. However, this precise specification was used only for a “irreducible complexity” and “complex specified information” tutorial demonstration of the power of cumulative selection rather were shown not to be beyond the capabilities of evolution, than for generation of true novelty. In the Dawkins example, contrary to official ID dogma. the known target is the phrase from Hamlet, “Methinks it is like a weasel.” The organisms are initially random strings of Genetic Algorithms twenty-eight characters each. Every generation is tested, and “Genetic algorithms” (GAs) are computerized simulations of the string that is closest to the target Weasel phrase is selected evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Medicine an the White House Commission
    Sept. 11 Conspiracy Book • Moscow Mysteries • The Return of Spring-Heeled Jack Alternative Medicine an the White House Commission . • THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF CLAIMS OF THE PARANORMAL AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-INTERNATIONAL |ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO) • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz. Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy. State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock,* psychologist. York Univ., Susan Haack, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts Irmgard Oepen, professor of medicine Toronto and Sciences, prof, of philosophy. University (retired), Marburg, Germany Jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Albany, of Miami Loren Pankratz. psychologist, Oregon Health Oregon C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist, Univ. of Wales Sciences Univ. Marcia Angell, M.D., former editor-in-chief, Al Hibbs, scientist, Jet Propulsion Laboratory John Paulos, mathematician, Temple Univ. New England Journal of Medicine Douglas Hofstadter, professor of human Steven Pinker, cognitive scientist, MIT Robert A. Baker, psychologist. Univ. of understanding and cognitive science, Massimo Polidoro, science writer, author, Kentucky Indiana Univ. executive director CICAP, Italy Stephen Barrett M.D., psychiatrist, author, Gerald Holton, Mallinckrodt Professor of Milton Rosenberg, psychologist, Univ. of consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa. Physics and professor of history of science. Chicago Barry Beyerstein,* biopsychologist, Simon Harvard Univ. Wallace Sampson, M.D., clinical professor of Fraser Univ., Vancouver, B.C., Canada Ray Hyman,* psychologist, Univ. of Oregon medicine, Stanford Univ., editor. Scientific Irving Biederman, psychologist Univ. of Leon Jaroff, sciences editor emeritus, 77me Review of Alternative Medicine Southern California Sergei Kapitza, former editor, Russian edition, Amardeo Sarma, engineer, head of dept.
    [Show full text]