Pleistocene Tephra and Ash-Flow Deposits in the Volcanic Highlands of Guatemala

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pleistocene Tephra and Ash-Flow Deposits in the Volcanic Highlands of Guatemala Pleistocene Tephra and Ash-Flow Deposits in the Volcanic Highlands of Guatemala ALLAN J. KOCH P.O. Box 5444, Denver, Colorado 80217 HUGH McLEAN U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 ABSTRACT rently active. The highlands lie largely STRATIGRAPHY above 1,500 m, many of the volcanoes Twenty-six Pleistocene tephra layers, reaching altitudes of more than 3,700 m. Twenty-six tephra layers, four ash-flow four ash-flow tuff deposits, and four North of the volcanoes lie a series of tuff units, four fluvial lacustrine sediment fluvial-lacustrine sediment sequences, flat-floored intermontane basins (Fig. 1). sequences, and numerous paleosols com- interstratified with paleosols, occur in an During the Pleistocene Epoch, periodic pose the surficial stratigraphic succession area of 1,500 km2 between Guatemala City eruptions deposited large volumes of silicic (Fig. 2). Formal stratigraphic nomenclature and Lake Atitlan. Most of the tephra layers pumice and ash over nearly all of the high- for these deposits has been avoided to and one of the ash flows can be individually lands and beyond. Much of the pyroclastic maintain a flexible system that may be eas- recognized in the field by mineralogy of ejecta was erupted high into the air as ily amended or modified by future workers. Fe-Mg phenocrysts, texture, pumice color, tephra (Thorarinsson, 1954), where it Major tephra units are designated with and stratigraphic position. cooled and was distributed by prevailing random capital letters (E, C, L, T, and so The texture, thickness, and distribution winds as a continuous mantle of air-fall de- forth). Tephra layers believed to be of local of the tephra layers indicate that they posits over the surrounding terrain. A large extent or that are not well exposed are originated from five separate centers: the portion of the pyroclastic material, how- given letters with numerical subscripts (Jj, Pacaya volcanic complex, Agua Volcano, ever, was erupted as hot turbulent mixtures Z2). Ash-flow tuffs carry the same letter as Acatenango or Fuego Volcanoes, the Lake of gas, pumice, and ash that moved rapidly the underlying tephra layer; for example, Atitlan area, and the Laguna de Ayarza across the ground surface, flowing preferen- the H ash-flow tuff overlies tephra layer H. area. The exact sources of the ash flows are tially down stream valleys and into basins Paleosols and sediment sequences are des- not known. Size of pumice clasts, pumice and in some cases accumulating to thick- ignated according to the youngest tephra texture, and mineral content show that the nesses of hundreds of meters. The turbulent unit they overlie (for example, post-T basin-filling ash-flow tuff units are of prim- mixtures of gas and ejecta material are here paleosol, post-H sediments). ary origin and could not have resulted from referred to as ash flows and their resulting Two surficial stratigraphic successions inwash of previously deposited pumiceous deposits as ash-flow tuffs, following the have been identified. An upland succession tephra. Each ash-flow tuff apparently was usage of Ross and Smith (1961). consisting of tephra and paleosols occurs deposited shortly after a tephra eruption. A surficial mantle of pumiceous ejecta on topography lying above the level of the Reconnaissance work indicates that the has been deposited on the north side of the basin fills. The more complex basin succes- H ash-flow tuff unit and its underlying volcanic chain, but very little pumice and sion consists of tephra, ash-flow tuff units, tephra cover a major portion of the vol- ash are preserved south of the volcanoes, and fluvial and lacustrine sedimentary canic highlands — at least 16,000 km2 and indicating prevailing southerly winds dur- rocks interstratified with paleosols (Fig. 3). 7,500 km2, respectively. Their source prob- ing eruptions. The stratigraphy of the These topographically controlled facies of ably lies close to the Lake Atitlan area. flat-floored pumice- and ash-filled basins Pleistocene pumice deposits are illustrated These units should be extremely useful as and adjacent tephra-covered uplands is well in Figure 4 and contrast the depositional time-stratigraphic marker horizons in other exposed in stream and road cuts through- history of the Guatemala City basin and its parts of the Guatemalan highlands. out a 1,500 km2 area between Guatemala surrounding highlands. The highland Radiometric dating indicates that most City and Lake Atitlan. tephra-paleosol succession is more than 30 major tephra and ash-flow deposits were The purpose of this paper is to discuss the m thick near the source volcanoes, whereas deposited between 40,000 yr and 1.84 m.y. stratigraphy, distribution, composition, due to the additional accumulation of the ago. Were similar eruptions to occur today, age, and origin of the Pleistocene tephra ash-flow tuffs and sedimentary rocks, the widespread devastation and loss of life and ash-flow deposits. This paper is based basin fill locally exceeds 100 m. could result. Key words: stratigraphy, Pleis- on field and laboratory work completed in Tephra layers are well sorted and contain tocene, pyroclastics, volcanism, absolute 1969 and 1970 by Koch (1970) and angular pumice clasts as a result of explo- age. McLean (1970). Prior to this study, no de- sive ejection and aerial transport. Particle tailed systematic examination of these de- size and thickness decrease and sorting in- INTRODUCTION posits had been attempted. However, some creases with distance from the source vent. general information is available on the dis- Two of the larger tephra sheets, E and L, The highlands between Lake Atitlan and tribution, origin, age, and mineralogy of are at least 10 m thick near their source. Guatemala City are composed mainly of pumiceous deposits in selected areas (Wil- The maximum size of pumice bombs and eroded late Tertiary volcanic rocks and a liams, I960; McBirney, 1963; Williams accidental lithic fragments reaches 23 cm strikingly linear chain of Quaternary com- and others, 1964; Bonis, 1965; Bonis and and 15 cm, respectively. Many tephra posite volcanoes, some of which are cur- others, 1966). layers are reversely graded, probably indi- Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 86, p. 529-541, 13 figs., April 1975, Doc. no. 50411. 529 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/86/4/529/3443996/i0016-7606-86-4-529.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 530 KOCH AND McLEAN eating a progressive increase with time in post-E soil is believed to be more than volume. The average lithic fragment con- the intensity of the eruptions. Other units 40,000 years old. tent for the L, R, and T tuffs is about 20 to have alternating fine- and coarse-textured Gray andesitic tephra are much more 30 percent by volume. horizons suggesting cyclic changes in inten- numerous among younger deposits, and The H ash-flow tuff, in contrast to the sity of the eruptions. Few of the tephra only a few are interbedded with older white three older units, is a unique deposit with layers contain evidence of intralayer weath- tephra. The majority of the younger cinder many identifiable characteristics. The upper ering, suggesting that the eruptions that layers in the Guatemala City—Antigua areas portion of the layer is usually pink (10R produced the layers were short lived. Where were derived from Agua and Pacaya Vol- 7/4). The pink tint tends to be quite uniform tephra rained down upon slopes of 30 per- canoes. Some cinder layers extend more and in many outcrops forms a sharp color cent grade or more, larger particles rolled than 20 km from the parent volcanoes. contrast with the lower light-gray (10YR downhill over smaller particles, resulting in Field criteria found most useful in dif- 7/1) portion of the layer. In other areas, the stratification and a thicker accumulation at ferentiating the tephra layers include (1) the pink tint is patchy. No textural or composi- the base of the slope. The term "roll bed- character of the loose Fe-Mg crystals within tional change has been observed with the ding" is proposed for this type of the ash fraction of the layer; (2) color of color change. Unlike the older ash-flow stratification. Tephra particles deposited in pumice and ash; (3) bedding characteristics, tuffs, the lithic fragments in H include lake waters are well stratified, and some are such as alternating fine and coarse layers or plutonic as well as volcanic rock types. The reversely graded. well-developed reverse-graded bedding; plutonic lithic fragments consist largely of Ash-flow tuff units compose the bulk of and (4) nature and abundance of accessory coarse-grained biotite-bearing granite, the flat-floored basin fills. Where unre- rock fragments. These criteria, in conjunc- quartz monzonite, and granodiorite and worked, they are characterized by lack of tion with the relative maturity of associated compose about 15 percent of the total lithic sorting and stratification (Fig. 5). They typ- paleosols and a comparison of the layer's component. Microcline is the dominant ically have irregular lower boundaries and stratigraphie position with known marker feldspar in some of the granite examined. flat upper contacts. A matrix of fine to horizons, usually permit on-the-spot The volcanic fragments are composed coarse ash, pumice, and lithic fragments identification. largely of porphyritic augite—hypersthene predominates over lapilli- and bomb-sized Some tephra layers have highly charac- andesite and lesser amounts of andesitic pumice and lithic fragments. Maximum teristic features that help determine the crystal-vitric tuffs. diameters of pumice bombs and lithic stratigraphie order and simplify the tracing fragments reach 60 cm and 40 cm, respec- of units within the basin fills. For example, COMPOSITION tively. In many localities, the ash-flow tuffs tephra Y is distinctive in the field, the upper contain charcoal logs and branches, inclu- one-third to one-half of the layer being dark Tephra pumice is composed of glass, sion trains of lithic fragments, and a mea- gray, in contrast to a lower white portion phenocrysts of plagioclase, minor amounts surable preferential orientation of elongate (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • A Detection of Milankovitch Frequencies in Global Volcanic Activity
    A detection of Milankovitch frequencies in global volcanic activity Steffen Kutterolf1*, Marion Jegen1, Jerry X. Mitrovica2, Tom Kwasnitschka1, Armin Freundt1, and Peter J. Huybers2 1Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 574, GEOMAR, Wischhofstrasse 1-3, 24148 Kiel, Germany 2Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA ABSTRACT 490 k.y. in the Central American Volcanic Arc A rigorous detection of Milankovitch periodicities in volcanic output across the Pleistocene- (CAVA; Fig. 1). We augment these data with Holocene ice age has remained elusive. We report on a spectral analysis of a large number of 42 tephra layers extending over ~1 m.y. found well-preserved ash plume deposits recorded in marine sediments along the Pacifi c Ring of in Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) and Fire. Our analysis yields a statistically signifi cant detection of a spectral peak at the obliquity Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Legs offshore period. We propose that this variability in volcanic activity results from crustal stress changes of Central America. The marine tephra records associated with ice age mass redistribution. In particular, increased volcanism lags behind in Central America are dated using estimated the highest rate of increasing eustatic sea level (decreasing global ice volume) by 4.0 ± 3.6 k.y. sedimentation rates and/or through correlation and correlates with numerical predictions of stress changes at volcanically active sites. These with radiometrically dated on-land deposits results support the presence of a causal link between variations in ice age climate, continental (e.g., Kutterolf et al., 2008; also see the GSA stress fi eld, and volcanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending the Late Holocene White River Ash Distribution, Northwestern Canada STEPHEN D
    ARCTIC VOL. 54, NO. 2 (JUNE 2001) P. 157– 161 Extending the Late Holocene White River Ash Distribution, Northwestern Canada STEPHEN D. ROBINSON1 (Received 30 May 2000; accepted in revised form 25 September 2000) ABSTRACT. Peatlands are a particularly good medium for trapping and preserving tephra, as their surfaces are wet and well vegetated. The extent of tephra-depositing events can often be greatly expanded through the observation of ash in peatlands. This paper uses the presence of the White River tephra layer (1200 B.P.) in peatlands to extend the known distribution of this late Holocene tephra into the Mackenzie Valley, northwestern Canada. The ash has been noted almost to the western shore of Great Slave Lake, over 1300 km from the source in southeastern Alaska. This new distribution covers approximately 540000 km2 with a tephra volume of 27 km3. The short time span and constrained timing of volcanic ash deposition, combined with unique physical and chemical parameters, make tephra layers ideal for use as chronostratigraphic markers. Key words: chronostratigraphy, Mackenzie Valley, peatlands, White River ash RÉSUMÉ. Les tourbières constituent un milieu particulièrement approprié au piégeage et à la conservation de téphra, en raison de l’humidité et de l’abondance de végétation qui règnent en surface. L’observation des cendres contenues dans les tourbières permet souvent d’élargir notablement les limites spatiales connues des épisodes de dépôts de téphra. Cet article recourt à la présence de la couche de téphra de la rivière White (1200 BP) dans les tourbières pour agrandir la distribution connue de ce téphra datant de l’Holocène supérieur dans la vallée du Mackenzie, située dans le Nord-Ouest canadien.
    [Show full text]
  • Amenaza Volcánica Del Área De Managua Y Sus Alrededores (Nicaragua)”
    Parte II.3: Amenaza volcánica 127 Parte II.3 Guía técnica de la elaboración del mapa de “Amenaza volcánica del área de Managua y sus alrededores (Nicaragua)” 128 Parte II.3: Amenaza volcánica Índice 1 Resumen.......................................................................................................................130 2 Lista de figuras y tablas...............................................................................................131 3 Introducción.................................................................................................................132 4 Objetivos.......................................................................................................................132 5 Metodología.................................................................................................................133 5.1 Recopilación de los datos y análisis de los peligros volcánicos existentes............133 5.1.1 Complejo Masaya.............................................................................................133 5.1.1.1 Flujos de lava..............................................................................................134 5.1.1.2 Caída de tefra..............................................................................................134 5.1.1.3 Flujos piroclásticos y Oleadas piroclásticas...............................................135 5.1.1.4 Flujos de lodo y detritos (lahares)..............................................................135 5.1.1.5 Emanaciones de gas....................................................................................136
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive Eruptions
    Explosive Eruptions -What are considered explosive eruptions? Fire Fountains, Splatter, Eruption Columns, Pyroclastic Flows. Tephra – Any fragment of volcanic rock emitted during an eruption. Ash/Dust (Small) – Small particles of volcanic glass. Lapilli/Cinders (Medium) – Medium sized rocks formed from solidified lava. – Basaltic Cinders (Reticulite(rare) + Scoria) – Volcanic Glass that solidified around gas bubbles. – Accretionary Lapilli – Balls of ash – Intermediate/Felsic Cinders (Pumice) – Low density solidified ‘froth’, floats on water. Blocks (large) – Pre-existing rock blown apart by eruption. Bombs (large) – Solidified in air, before hitting ground Fire Fountaining – Gas-rich lava splatters, and then flows down slope. – Produces Cinder Cones + Splatter Cones – Cinder Cone – Often composed of scoria, and horseshoe shaped. – Splatter Cone – Lava less gassy, shape reflects that formed by splatter. Hydrovolcanic – Erupting underwater (Ocean or Ground) near the surface, causes violent eruption. Marr – Depression caused by steam eruption with little magma material. Tuff Ring – Type of Marr with tephra around depression. Intermediate Magmas/Lavas Stratovolcanoes/Composite Cone – 1-3 eruption types (A single eruption may include any or all 3) 1. Eruption Column – Ash cloud rises into the atmosphere. 2. Pyroclastic Flows Direct Blast + Landsides Ash Cloud – Once it reaches neutral buoyancy level, characteristic ‘umbrella cap’ forms, & debris fall. Larger ash is deposited closer to the volcano, fine particles are carried further. Pyroclastic Flow – Mixture of hot gas and ash to dense to rise (moves very quickly). – Dense flows restricted to valley bottoms, less dense flows may rise over ridges. Steam Eruptions – Small (relative) steam eruptions may occur up to a year before major eruption event. .
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Volcanoes, Based on Recent Seismic Activity; There Are Over 200 Geological Young Volcanic Centres
    Volcanoes of Canada 1 V4 C.J. Hickson and M. Ulmi, Jan. 3, 2006 • Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics Where do volcanoes occur? Driving forces • Volcano chemistry and eruption types • Volcanic Hazards Pyroclastic flows and surges Lava flows Ash fall (tephra) Lahars/Debris Flows Debris Avalanches Volcanic Gases • Anatomy of an Eruption – Mt. St. Helens • Volcanoes of Canada Stikine volcanic belt Presentation Outline Anahim volcanic belt Wells Gray – Clearwater volcanic field 2 Garibaldi volcanic belt • USA volcanoes – Cascade Magmatic Arc V4 Volcanoes in Our Backyard Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics In Canada, British Columbia and Yukon are the host to a vast wealth of volcanic 3 landforms. V4 How many active volcanoes are there on Earth? • Erupting now about 20 • Each year 50-70 • Each decade about 160 • Historical eruptions about 550 Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics • Holocene eruptions (last 10,000 years) about 1500 Although none of Canada’s volcanoes are erupting now, they have been active as recently as a couple of 4 hundred years ago. V4 The Earth’s Beginning Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 5 V4 The Earth’s Beginning These global forces have created, mountain Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics ranges, continents and oceans. 6 V4 continental crust ic ocean crust mantle Where do volcanoes occur? Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 7 V4 Driving Forces: Moving Plates Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 8 V4 Driving Forces: Subduction Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 9 V4 Driving Forces: Hot Spots Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 10 V4 Driving Forces: Rifting Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics Ocean plates moving apart create new crust.
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Explosive Eruption in Historical Times in the Andes at A.D
    b- Largest explosive eruption in historical times in the Andes at A.D. Huaynaputina volcano, 1600, southern Peru Jean-Claude ThOuret* IRD and Instituto Geofisicodel PerÚ, Calle Calatrava 21 6. Urbanización Camino Real, La Molina, Lima 12, Perú Jasmine Davila Instituto Geofísico del Perú, Lima, Perú Jean-Philippe Eissen IRD Centre de Brest BP 70, 29280 Plouzane Cedex, France ABSTRACT lent [DREI volume. km': Table The The largest esplosive eruption (volcanic explosivity index of 6) in historical times in the 4.4-5.6 I). tephra is composed of -SO% pumice with rhyolitic Andes took place in 1600 at Huaynaputina volcano in southern Peru. According to chroni- A.D. glass, crystals (mostly amphibole and bio- cles, the eruption began on February 19 with a Plinian phase and lasted until March 6. Repeated 15% tite), and 5% xenoliths including hydrothermally tephra falls, pyroclastic flows, and surges devastated an area 70 x 40 kni? west of the vent and altered fragments from the volcanic and sedimen- affected all of southern Peru, and earthquakes shook the city of Arequipa 75 km away. Eight tnry bedrock, and a small amount of accessory lwa deposits, totaling 10.2-13.1 km3 in bulk volume, are attributed to this eruption: (1) a widespread, fragments. The erupted pumice is a white, , -S.1 kn3 pumice-fall deposit; (2) channeled ignimbrites (1.6-2 km3) with (3) ground-surge and medium-potassicdacite (average SiO, and ash-cloud-surge deposits; (4) widespread co-ignimbrite ash layers; (5) base-surge deposits; (6) 63.6% 1.85% hlgO) of the potassic calc-alkalic suite.
    [Show full text]
  • Remotely Assessing Tephra Fall Building Damage and Vulnerability: Kelud Volcano, Indonesia George T
    Williams et al. Journal of Applied Volcanology (2020) 9:10 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-020-00100-5 RESEARCH Open Access Remotely assessing tephra fall building damage and vulnerability: Kelud Volcano, Indonesia George T. Williams1,2* , Susanna F. Jenkins1,2, Sébastien Biass1, Haryo Edi Wibowo3,4 and Agung Harijoko3,4 Abstract Tephra from large explosive eruptions can cause damage to buildings over wide geographical areas, creating a variety of issues for post-eruption recovery. This means that evaluating the extent and nature of likely building damage from future eruptions is an important aspect of volcanic risk assessment. However, our ability to make accurate assessments is currently limited by poor characterisation of how buildings perform under varying tephra loads. This study presents a method to remotely assess building damage to increase the quantity of data available for developing new tephra fall building vulnerability models. Given the large number of damaged buildings and the high potential for loss in future eruptions, we use the Kelud 2014 eruption as a case study. A total of 1154 buildings affected by falls 1–10 cm thick were assessed, with 790 showing signs that they sustained damage in the time between pre- and post-eruption satellite image acquisitions. Only 27 of the buildings surveyed appear to have experienced severe roof or building collapse. Damage was more commonly characterised by collapse of roof overhangs and verandas or damage that required roof cladding replacement. To estimate tephra loads received by each building we used Tephra2 inversion and interpolation of hand-contoured isopachs on the same set of deposit measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Impacts from Tephra Fall to Electric Power Systems: a Review and Mitigation Strategies
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UC Research Repository Bull Volcanol DOI 10.1007/s00445-012-0664-3 REVIEW ARTICLE Potential impacts from tephra fall to electric power systems: a review and mitigation strategies J. B. Wardman & T. M. Wilson & P. S. Bodger & J. W. Cole & C. Stewart Received: 9 May 2012 /Accepted: 20 September 2012 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012 Abstract Modern society is highly dependent on a reliable identified to avoid future unplanned interruptions. To ad- electricity supply. During explosive volcanic eruptions, dress this need, we have produced a fragility function that tephra contamination of power networks (systems) can com- quantifies the likelihood of insulator flashover at different promise the reliability of supply. Outages can have signifi- thicknesses of tephra. Finally, based on our review of case cant cascading impacts for other critical infrastructure studies, potential mitigation strategies are summarised. sectors and for society as a whole. This paper summarises Specifically, avoiding tephra-induced insulator flashover known impacts to power systems following tephra falls by cleaning key facilities such as generation sites and trans- since 1980. The main impacts are (1) supply outages from mission and distribution substations is of critical importance insulator flashover caused by tephra contamination, (2) dis- in maintaining the integrity of an electric power system. ruption of generation facilities, (3) controlled outages during tephra cleaning, (4) abrasion and corrosion of exposed Keywords Volcanic ash . Eruption . Electricity . equipment and (5) line (conductor) breakage due to tephra Generation . Transmission . Distribution . Substation loading. Of these impacts, insulator flashover is the most common disruption.
    [Show full text]
  • First International Symposium on Volcanic Ash and Aviation Safety
    Cover-Ash billows from the vent of Mount St. Helens Volcano, Washington, during the catastrophic eruption which began at 8:32 a.m. on May 18, 1980. View looks to the northeast. USGS photograph taken about noon by Robert M. Krimmel. FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON VOLCANIC ASH AND AVIATION SAFETY PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS SEATTLE, WASHINGTON JULY 8-12, 1991 Edited by THOMAS J. CASADEVALL Sponsored by Air Line Pilots Association Air Transport Association of America Federal Aviation Administration National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Geological Survey Co-sponsored by Aerospace Industries Association of America American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Flight Safety Foundation International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior National Transportation Safety Board U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 1065 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director This report has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1991 Available from the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Symposium Organization iv Introduction 1 Interest in the Ash Cloud Problem 1 References Cited 3 Acknowledgments 3 Program 4 Abstracts 11 Authors' Address List 48 Organizing Committee Addresses 58 Contents iii SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZATION Organizing Committee General Chairman: Donald D. Engen ALPA Edward Miller and William Phaneuf ATA Donald Trombley, Helen Weston, and Genice Morgan FAA Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudio Técnico De Linea Base Del Complejo Volcánico Acatenango - Fuego
    ESTUDIO TÉCNICO DE LINEA BASE DEL COMPLEJO VOLCÁNICO ACATENANGO - FUEGO Índice I. EQUIPO TECNICO .....................................................................................................................1 II. RESUMEN EJECUTIVO ...........................................................................................................2 III. ANTECEDENTES.....................................................................................................................3 IV. METODOLOGÍA ......................................................................................................................5 V. CARACTERIZACION DEL ÁREA ........................................................................................10 VI. ACTIVIDADES POTENCIALES ..........................................................................................48 VII. DEFINICIÓN DE OBJETOS DE CONSERVACIÓN ........................................................49 VIII. CONCLUSIONES ................................................................................................................51 IX. RECOMENDACIONES ..........................................................................................................51 X. BIBLIOGRAFIA .......................................................................................................................53 XI. ANEXOS ..................................................................................................................................57 ÍNDICE DE FIGURAS Y CUADROS Figura 1. Delimitación del
    [Show full text]
  • Aip Guatemala Enr 5.3-1 19 Aug 16 Aim Guatemala Aip Amdt 5/16
    AIP GUATEMALA ENR 5.3-1 19 AUG 16 ENR 5.3 OTRAS ACTIVIDADES DE ÍNDOLE PELIGROSA Límites Medidas Autoridad Límites Observaciones Verticales Aconsejables Aconsejables Laterales Elevación y Número (Advertencia) (Advertencia) 1 2 3 4 5 Al Oeste de Guatemala Estrato volcán compuesto, activo con Altura señales de bordes de caldera anular y VOLCÁN TACANÁ 4,092 metros sobre el nivel pequeños domos encima, con esporádicas 15 07 54N del mar y 2,300 de altura erupciones freáticas y emisión fumarólica Con actividad fumarólica no INSIVUMEH 092 06 30W relativa en 1855, 1878, 1903, 1949, 1950, mayo explosiva. 1986 que dio origen a un pequeño cráter Departamento de San Marcos Número 1401-13 a 3,600 metros en el flanco noreste del volcán. VOLCÁN TAJUMULCO Altura 15 02 33N 4,220 metros sobre el nivel Estrato volcán compuesto, elevado sobre 091 54 14W del mar, con una altura altas mesetas con actividad fumarólica y INSIVUMEH relativa de 1,200 metros. explosiones en 1821 y 1863. Departamento de San Marcos Número 1401-02 Estrato volcán compuesto, se estima que ha tenido actividad durante los últimos Altura 30,000 años, con reposos de cientos de VOLCÁN SANTA MARÍA 3,772 metros sobre el nivel años, la última gran erupción se efectuó 14 45 23N del mar, altura relativa de en 1902, de tipo pliniano, la ceniza 91 33 06W 1,500 metros. transportada al oeste noroeste a una INSIVUMEH altura de 28 kilómetros, extendiéndose Departamento de Quetzaltenango Número 1401-03 1,500 kilómetros llegando a territorio Mexicano hasta la ciudad de Huaxaca.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on a Map of the 1961–2010 Eruptions of Volcán De Pacaya, Guatemala
    The Geological Society of America Digital Map and Chart Series 10 2012 Notes on a Map of the 1961–2010 Eruptions of Volcán de Pacaya, Guatemala Ruben Otoniel Matías Gomez William I. Rose José Luis Palma* Rüdiger Escobar-Wolf Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931, USA ABSTRACT A database of geologic units emplaced during the eruptions of the Volcán de Pacaya, Guatemala, from 1961 to 2010, has been compiled in a geographic information system (GIS). The mapping of the units is based on integrating information from aerial photo- graphs, satellite images, and detailed fi eld observations. The information consists of a total of 249 lava fl ow units, six pyroclastic fl ow units, two scoria-fall units, two undivided pyroclastic units (proximal and distal), one aeolian sediments unit, and one alluvium unit, all of which are defi ned as polygons in the GIS. A total of 349 eruptive vents associ- ated with fl ow units were also identifi ed and defi ned as points in the GIS. Volumes were calculated for all lava fl ows, yielding a cumulative volume of 0.078 km3 (not corrected for density). The volumes of four tephra deposits related to explosive events during this period were also calculated, and yielded values of the order of 106 to >107 m3 each. Geo- chemical data of 69 samples of lava show that the composition of erupted products did not change systematically, with SiO2 ranging from 50 to 52.5 wt%. The GIS information is organized in geologic units, coded by date of emplacement between 1961 and 2010, and is presented in eight geologic maps, showing the units exposed at the surface at different intervals of time.
    [Show full text]