DOCSLIB.ORG

XENOPHON's "ANABASIS" from CHARACTER to NARRATOR Author(S): JONAS GRETHLEIN Source: the Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
XENOPHON's XENOPHON'S "ANABASIS" FROM CHARACTER TO NARRATOR Author(s): JONAS GRETHLEIN Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 132 (2012), pp. 23-40 Published by: Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41722252 Accessed: 11-01-2016 18:52 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies and Cambridge University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 192.122.237.41 on Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:52:30 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Journalof Hellenic Studies 132 (2012) 23^10 doi:10. 1017/S007542691 2000031 XENOPHON'S ANABASIS FROM CHARACTER TO NARRATOR JONAS GRETHLEIN University of Heidelberg* Abstract:Xenophon participated in the March of the Ten Thousand, but in theAnabasis , instead of parading his autopsy,he keeps his narratorial persona separate from his character. This separation, however, is subtly blurred when, on theone hand, the narrator adopts the perspective of thecharacter, who is byfar the most prominent focalizing instancein thenarrative, and, on theother hand, the character appropriates narratorial functions: Xenophon the charactercomes to the fore as embeddednarrator and commentator ofthe events. Furthermore, hisreferences tothe pastcan be readas meta-historical,i.e.they shed light on the commemorative actof the Anabasis. While the choice ofa hetero-diegeticnarrator helps Xenophon to enhance the credibility ofthe account of his deeds, the intricate entan- glementof narrator and character contributes tothe characterization ofhimself as theprivileged agent in the March of theTen Thousand. Keywords:Xenophon, Anabasis , Greek historiography, narrative It is necessaryto gatherthe deeds themselvesnot just as it happens,but to researchabout the same againand againin a laboriousand toilsomeprocess, and mostof all to witnessand see themdirectly (Luc. Hist,conscr. 47). The high esteem forautopsy which we findin Lucian can be tracedback to the verybeginning of Greek historiography.Herodotus frequentlybacks up his narrativeby referencesto what he has seen himself,and Thucydides,who notes thatthe sightsof ruins can be deceptive (1.10.3), nonethelessemphasizes that he reportswhat he has seen himselfor heard fromeyewitnesses 1 (1. 22.2-3). Xenophon does not provide us with explicitreflections on his method,but thereis no reason to assume that he did not share his predecessors' trustin eyewitnesses. The intro- ductionto the Symposiumrather suggests a similarappreciation of the stance of the eyewitness: 'I want to reveal the events at which I was present from which I know these things...'. Accordingly,the account of Cyrus' death in theAnabasis is backed up by a referenceto Ctesias who was present(1.8.27). It is also worthconsidering whether in Xenophon's historiographie works charactersvoice his own convictionwhen theyemphasize theirstatus as eyewitnessesor criticizethe absence of directexperience in others.2Seen fromthis perspective, it is strikingthat Xenophon does not draw attentionto his status as an eyewitness in the Anabasis. Although Xenophon participatedin the march of the Ten Thousand throughAsia and back to Ionia, and althoughhe played a major role in it (if we believe his account!), theAnabasis is told by a hetero- diegeticnarrator.3 * [email protected] onlyheard what had happenedto Mnasippus,but translationsof the Anabasisare taken,with slight nobodyhad seen it'. Cf.Gray (2003) 116, n.23. modifications,from Waterfield and Rood (2005). I 3 Unlikea homo-diegeticnarrator, a hetero-diegetic thankmy Heidelberg colleague Bill Furley, the journal's narratoris notpart of theaction, cf. Genette (1972) twoanonymous readers and editor for their stimulating 155-56. Thenarratorial personae of ancient historians commentsand suggestions. haveattracted much attention lately, see, for example, 1See, for example, Nenci (1955); Schepens (1980). Dewald(1987); (2002) on Herodotus;Gribble (1998) 2 See, forexample, Hell. 6.2.31,where Iphikrates on Thucydides;Grethlein (2006) on Sallust.See also mistruststhe news about Mnasippus' defeat 'because he Marincola(1997), particularly 63-216. This content downloaded from 192.122.237.41 on Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:52:30 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 24 GRETHLEIN Caesar's Commentariion the Gallic War parallel the Anabasis in thatthe authorchooses a hetero-diegeticnarratorial persona for a narrativein which he figuresas a centralcharacter.4 However, while Caesar publishedBellum Gallicum under his own name, it is disputedhow the Anabasis was published. In his Hellenica , Xenophon refersto a work on the march of the Ten Thousand writtenby Themistogenes(3.1.2), and since elsewherethis name is only mentionedin the Suda, many scholars assume thatit is the pseudonymunder which theAnabasis circulated.5 Jacoby,on the otherhand, insiststhat the Anabasis was an anonymouspublication and thatthe referenceto Themistogenesin the Hellenica was not more than a 'momentous fiction'.6 No matterwhich view we adopt, the use of a hetero-diegeticnarrator makes the narrativelook unbiased in general- Lucian hails Xenophon as a cruyypacpsùçSÍKaioç (Hist, conscr.39) - and in particularlends credibilityto the presentationof his own role in the expedition. Plutarchalready noted thatXenophon had attributedthe Anabasis to Themistogenes'in orderto be trustworthier when referringto himselfas if to another' (De glor. Ath. 1, 345E).7 In the words of a modern scholar,Xenophon's 'works recognise the value of a mostlyimpersonal narrative told in a style largelyfree of rhetoricaladornment, in achieving credibility. It is no coincidence that for the ancientsand (untilrecently) moderns, his work was consideredvery reliable'.8 In thispaper, I would like to take a freshlook at the relationbetween Xenophon the narrator and Xenophon the characterin the narrative.As commentatorssince Plutarchhave pointedout, the two are clearlyseparate, but I shall argue thatthe separationgets subtlyblurred when, on the one hand, the narratoradopts the character'sperspective and, on the other,the characterappro- priatesnarratorial functions.9 I shall investigatethe relevance of Xenophon's perspectivein the narrative(I), his role as embeddednarrator (II), his functionas internalcommentator (III) and the meta-historicaldimension of some of his reflections(IV). Finally,I will suggestthat while the separation of narratorand characterserves the purposes of the former'sself-fashioning, the complex interactionbetween the two contributesto the characterizationof the latter(V). For the sake of clarity,in the followingall unqualifiedreferences to Xenophon will signifythe character in theAnabasis. I. Xenophon as instance of focalization and beyond focalization10 The Anabasis is writtenfrom the viewpointwhich Lucian has aptlycalled the perspectiveof the Homeric Zeus (Hist, conscr.49). This means thatthe narratorhas insightsinto more or less all aspects of the action which, in the case of the Anabasis , seems to present itself without 4Marincola (1997) 197 notes that the use of the third intoXenophon's consciousness and concludes that the personby Caesar is unusualand deems it possible that it narratorof the Anabasisis only formallyhetero- ismodelled on the example of Xenophon. On the hetero- diegetic,but actually homo-diegetic. However, Dorati diegeticthird-person narrator in Caesar,see Görler underestimatestheliberty which ancient historians take (1976);Reijgwart (1993); Riggsby (2006) 150-55. inreporting the thoughts and feelings of their characters 5 See, for example,Breitenbach (1967) 1645; ingeneral - thismakes the internal focalization through Higgins(1977) 93; Gray(2003) 111, n.2; Tuplin (2003) Xenophonin the Anabasis less unique than he thinks - 154. Waterfield(2006) 190 suggeststhat Themisto- andtends to mix up the level of diegesis with the notion genesmay have been a friendof Xenophon. See also offocalization. Dorati(2007) 105-06. 10De Jong'spioneering applications (1987; 1991) 6FGrH II D 349. havemade Bal's (1985) conceptof focalizationvery 7For further assessments ofXenophon and his style, popularin classicalstudies. However, as forexample fromthe early empire, see Rutherford (1998) 64-79. Nelles(1990) and Rood (1998) show, Bal's verywide 8 Marincola(1997) 10. See also Gray(2004) concept,which also subsumesthe narratorial instance 129-30.On third-person narrative inhistoriography in underfocalization and attributesto each narratorial general,see Kraus (1994) 139. stancea stanceof focalization, is questionable. I shall 9 Thishas alreadybeen noted in passingby Gray thereforestick with Genette 's system (1972), according (2004)132; Purves (2010) 194. Froma differentangle, towhich 'focalization' refers to perception ('qui voiť), see Dorati(2007), who emphasizes the insights given whilevoice signifies the level of utterance ('qui dit'). This content downloaded from 192.122.237.41 on Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:52:30 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop
    The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop N THE ANABASIS, Xenophon asserts that the Persian prince Cyrus the Younger was falsely accused of plotting a coup I d’état against King Artaxerxes II shortly after his accession to the throne in 404 BCE. Spared from execution by the Queen Mother Parysatis, Cyrus returned to Lydia determined to seize the throne for himself. He secretly prepared his rebellion by securing access to thousands of Greek hoplites, winning over Persian officials and most of the Greek cities of Ionia, and continuing to send tribute and assurances of his loyalty to the unsuspecting King (1.1).1 In Xenophon’s timeline, the rebellion was not official until sometime between the muster of his army at Sardis in spring 401, which spurred his rival Tissaphernes to warn Artaxerxes (1.2.4–5), and his arrival several months later at Thapsacus on the Euphrates, where Cyrus first openly an- nounced his true intentions (1.4.11). Questioning the “strange blindness” of Artaxerxes in light of Cyrus’ seemingly obvious preparations for revolt, Pierre Briant proposed an alternative timeline placing the outbreak of the rebellion almost immediately after Cyrus’ return to Sardis in late 404 or early 403.2 In his reconstruction, the King allowed Cyrus 1 See also Ctesias FGrHist 688 F 16.59, Diod. 14.19, Plut. Artax. 3–4. 2 Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander (Winona Lake 2002) 617–620. J. K. Anderson, Xenophon (New York 1974) 80, expresses a similar skepticism. Briant concludes his discussion by stating that the rebellion officially (Briant does not define “official,” but I take it to mean when either the King or Cyrus declared it publicly) began in 401 with the muster of Cyrus’ army at Sardis, but it is nonetheless appropriate to characterize Briant’s position as dating the official outbreak of the revolt to 404/3.
    [Show full text]
  • Citations in Classics and Ancient History
    Citations in Classics and Ancient History The most common style in use in the field of Classical Studies is the author-date style, also known as Chicago 2, but MLA is also quite common and perfectly acceptable. Quick guides for each of MLA and Chicago 2 are readily available as PDF downloads. The Chicago Manual of Style Online offers a guide on their web-page: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html The Modern Language Association (MLA) does not, but many educational institutions post an MLA guide for free access. While a specific citation style should be followed carefully, none take into account the specific practices of Classical Studies. They are all (Chicago, MLA and others) perfectly suitable for citing most resources, but should not be followed for citing ancient Greek and Latin primary source material, including primary sources in translation. Citing Primary Sources: Every ancient text has its own unique system for locating content by numbers. For example, Homer's Iliad is divided into 24 Books (what we might now call chapters) and the lines of each Book are numbered from line 1. Herodotus' Histories is divided into nine Books and each of these Books is divided into Chapters and each chapter into line numbers. The purpose of such a system is that the Iliad, or any primary source, can be cited in any language and from any publication and always refer to the same passage. That is why we do not cite Herodotus page 66. Page 66 in what publication, in what edition? Very early in your textbook, Apodexis Historia, a passage from Herodotus is reproduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2018 Volume 45 Issue 1
    Fall 2018 Volume 45 Issue 1 3 Matthew S. Brogdon “Who Would Be Free, Themselves Must Strike the Blow”: Revolt and Rhetoric in Douglass’s Heroic Slave and Melville’s Benito Cereno 25 Ariel Helfer Socrates’s Political Legacy: Xenophon’s Socratic Characters in Hellenica I and II 49 Lorraine Smith Pangle The Radicalness of Strauss’s On Tyranny 67 David Polansky & With Steel or Poison: Daniel Schillinger Machiavelli on Conspiracy Book Reviews: 87 Ingrid Ashida Persian Letters by Montesquieu 93 Kevin J. Burns Legacies of Losing in American Politics by Jeffrey Tulis and Nicole Mellow 97 Peter Busch Montesquieu and the Despotic Ideas of Europe by Vickie B. Sullivan 103 Rodrigo Chacón The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World by Oona A. Hathaway and Scott J. Shapiro 109 Bernard J. Dobski Shakespeare’s Thought: Unobserved Details and Unsuspected Depths in Thirteen Plays by David Lowenthal 119 Elizabeth C’ de Baca Eastman The Woman Question in Plato’s “Republic” by Mary Townsend 125 Michael P. Foley The Fragility of Consciousness: Faith, Reason, and the Human Good by Frederick Lawrence 129 Raymond Hain The New Testament: A Translation by David Bentley Hart 135 Thomas R. Pope Walker Percy and the Politics of the Wayfarer by Brian A. Smith Doubting Progress: Two Reviews 141 Lewis Hoss A Road to Nowhere: The Idea of Progress and Its Critics 147 Eno Trimçev by Matthew W. Slaboch ©2018 Interpretation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of the contents may be reproduced in any form without written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses The battlefield role of the Classical Greek general. Barley, N. D How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Barley, N. D (2012) The battlefield role of the Classical Greek general.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa43080 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Swansea University Prifysgol Abertawe The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General N. D. Barley Ph.D. Submitted to the Department of History and Classics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2012 ProQuest Number: 10821472 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Trebizond and North-Eastern Turkey
    TREBIZOND AND NORTH-EASTERN TURKEY BY DENIS A. H. WRIGHT A lecture delivered to the Royal Central Asian Society on Wednesday, October 24, 1945. In the Chair, Admiral Sir Howard Kelly, G.B.E., K.C.B., C.M.G., M.V.O. The CHAIRMAN, in introducing the lecturer, said: Mr. Denis Wright is going to speak to us about the port of Trebizond, whose poetical- sounding name suggests the starting-point of the " Golden Road to Samarkand." I had the pleasure of serving with Mr. Wright in Turkey. From September, 1939, to February, 1941, he was British Vice-Consul at Constanta. After the rupture of diplomatic relations with Rumania he went to take charge of the British Consulate at Trebizond. There, for almost two years, he and his wife were the only two English people; for part of that time he was the only British representative on the Black Sea. From May, 1943, until January of 1945 Mr. Wright was our Consul at Mersin. Although he and I had no direct dealings with each other, I know he was one of the most co-operative of all the British officials in Turkey, and that he did everything he possibly could to help the Services. WHEN in February, 1941, I passed through Ankara on my first visit to Trebizond I was told three things about the place: firstly, that it was the centre of a very large hazelnut-producing area, probably the largest in the world; secondly, that my British community there would be a very small one; and, thirdly, that Trebizond had for many hundreds of years been the transit port of a most important trade to and from Persia, that that trade still flourished, and that I should see camels arriving daily from Persia loaded with all the exotic merchandise of the East.
    [Show full text]
  • 09. Ch. 6 Huitink-Rood
    Histos Supplement ( ) – SUBORDINATE OFFICERS IN XENOPHON’S ANABASIS * Luuk Huitink and Tim Rood Abstract : This chapter focuses on Xenophon’s treatment of divisions within the command structure presented in the Anabasis , and in particular on three military positions that are briefly mentioned—the taxiarch, ὑποστράτηγος , and ὑπολόχαγος . Arguing against the prescriptive military hierarchies proposed in earlier scholarship, it suggests that ‘taxiarch’ should be understood fluidly and that the appearance of both the ὑποστράτηγος and the ὑπολόχαγος may be due to interpolation. The chapter also includes discussion of two types of comparative material: procedures for replacing dead, absent, or deposed generals at Athens and Sparta in the Classical period, and the lexical development of subordinate positions with the prefix ὑπο -. Keywords : Xenophon, Anabasis , subordinate commanders, taxiarch, ὑποστράτηγος , ὑπολόχαγος . enophon’s Anabasis has more often been broadly eulogised for its supposed depiction of the X democratic spirit of the Greek mercenaries whose adventures are recounted than analysed closely for the details it o?ers about the command structure of this ‘wandering republic’. 1 When Xenophon’s presentation of * References are to Xenophon’s Anabasis unless otherwise specified. Translations are adapted from the Loeb edition of Brownson and Dillery. We are grateful to Peter Rhodes for advice and to Simon Hornblower, Nick Stylianou, David Thomas, the editor, and the anonymous referee of Histos for comments on the whole article. Luuk Huitink’s work on this paper was made possible by ERC Grant Agreement n. B B (AncNar). 1 Krüger (E ) (‘civitatem peregrinantem’). On the command structure see Nussbaum (F) ‒E; Roy (F) EF‒; Lee ( F) ‒ , ‒ .
    [Show full text]
  • Xenophon's Life and Times: Some Important Dates
    Xenophon Anabasis Xenophon’s Life and Times: Some Important Dates BC 431 Outbreak of Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta 430 – 425 Birth of Xenophon (in Athens) 423 Birth of Cyrus the Younger 413 Destruction of the Athenian expedition to Sicily 411 – 410 Athenian democracy overthrown, and oligarchic rule imposed (The 400) 410 Democracy restored at Athens 407 Cyrus becomes viceroy of Asia Minor 406 Athenian victory at the Battle of Arginusae, and the subsequent trial of the generals. 405 Artaxerxes II (elder brother of Cyrus) succeeds to the throne of Persia The Athenian fleet is destroyed by Lysander at Aegospotami 404 Athens surrenders to Sparta The Thirty Tyrants are established at Athens Xenophon serves in their cavalry (?) 401 Xenophon joins the expedition of Cyrus the Younger who is defeated at the Battle of Cunaxa (near Babylon) Xenophon becomes a general and the Ten Thousand begin their retreat 400 The Ten Thousand reach the Black Sea, and continue their retreat to Byzantium Agesilaus becomes one of Sparta’s two kings 400 – 399 Xenophon and the Ten Thousand with Seuthes in Thrace 399 Xenophon brings the remnant of the Ten Thousand to join the Spartan Thibron in Asia Minor Socrates is tried and executed in Athens 399 – 394 Xenophon serves under the Spartans in Asia Minor 395 Outbreak of the Corinthian War: Athens, Corinth and Thebes in coalition against Sparta 394 Agesilaus is recalled from Asia Minor to Greece; Xenophon accompanies him Xenophon fights with Sparta at Coronea; he is formally exiled from Athens (if not already
    [Show full text]
  • Mercenaries, Poleis, and Empires in the Fourth Century Bce
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts ALL THE KING’S GREEKS: MERCENARIES, POLEIS, AND EMPIRES IN THE FOURTH CENTURY BCE A Dissertation in History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies by Jeffrey Rop © 2013 Jeffrey Rop Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 ii The dissertation of Jeffrey Rop was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark Munn Professor of Ancient Greek History and Greek Archaeology, Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Gary N. Knoppers Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Religious Studies, and Jewish Studies Garrett G. Fagan Professor of Ancient History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Kenneth Hirth Professor of Anthropology Carol Reardon George Winfree Professor of American History David Atwill Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies Graduate Program Director for the Department of History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines Greek mercenary service in the Near East from 401- 330 BCE. Traditionally, the employment of Greek soldiers by the Persian Achaemenid Empire and the Kingdom of Egypt during this period has been understood to indicate the military weakness of these polities and the superiority of Greek hoplites over their Near Eastern counterparts. I demonstrate that the purported superiority of Greek heavy infantry has been exaggerated by Greco-Roman authors. Furthermore, close examination of Greek mercenary service reveals that the recruitment of Greek soldiers was not the purpose of Achaemenid foreign policy in Greece and the Aegean, but was instead an indication of the political subordination of prominent Greek citizens and poleis, conducted through the social institution of xenia, to Persian satraps and kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Xenophon's Anabasis
    For there were many hetairai in the army: Women in Xenophon's ~4.nabasis 1 The mercenaries of Cyrus, the CyreaiLS, whose story Xenophon recounts in his Anabasis, are familiar figures to students of ancient warfare. 2 The women who accompanied the Cyreans for much of their march, in contrast, have so far received scant attention from historians more often interested in the details of tactics and leadership. 3 Nor is such neglect solely the fault of old~ fashioned military types, for even those who focus on the political and social aspects of the Anabasis army largely ignore its women4 What is more, although women make repeated appearances in Xenophon's narrative, scholars of women's roles and status in the ancient Greek have scarcely noticed their presence 5 This last omission appears all the more strildng, given the amount of scrutiny accorded recently to the category of the hetaira, and given that Xenophon several times describes women amongst the Cyreans as hetairai. 6 The histories of women and of warfare, it would seem, are not supposed to mix. Such an artificial boundary clearly invites brealdng, and the Anabasis provides invaluable material for the task. This essay examines Xenophon' s testimony on the origins and number of women amongst the Cyreans and the extent of their participation in the social life of the army. His narrative, as we shall see, indicates that at least some of the women who joined the Cyreans in the retreat from Cunaxa to the sea and thence to Byzantium became integral members of the soldiers' community.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrian the Personal Historian
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics Arrian the Personal Historian Version 1.0 December, 2005 Kyle Lakin Stanford Department of Classics & Stanford Law School Abstract: Current scholarship ignores the personal nature of the second preface of Arrian's Anabasis. This preface reveals that the Anabasis can be read as a work about Arrian's own personal identity. Arrian's biographical history allows us to speculate that his identity was in flux throughout his life. By understanding the Anabasis as Arrian's way to claim to be a Greek, we can better interpret his characterization of Alexander. © Kyle Lakin. [email protected] Lakin 2 Arrian the Personal Historian In his Anabasis, Arrian claims his work about Alexander as a peculiarly personal triumph for a historian. He does not claim it to be a defining work for all mankind but rather to fulfill a personal goal that he has held since childhood. …a)ll0 e)kei~no a0nagra&fw, o3ti e0moi\ patri&j te kai\ ge&noj kai\ a0rxai\ oi#de oi( lo&goi ei)si& te kai\ a0po\ ne&ou e!ti e)ge0nonto. (I.12.5) ...But I write this because these words are country, family, and offices and have been since I was a child. Arrian claims that oi#de oi( lo&goi has been a work connected to his personal life unlike any other. Much discussion over the meaning of oi#de oi( lo&goi has shown that its interpretation depends mostly upon the view that an individual scholar holds concerning Arrian’s trustworthiness. It has been interpreted as everything from “this history” to “these writings” to “writing history” in an abstract sense.1 But the interpretation of this passage is crucial to our interpretation of the work, for if Arrian’s history was intensely personal, then this raises questions about his historiographical aims and method.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persecution of Christians in the First Century
    JETS 61.3 (2018): 525–47 THE PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS IN THE FIRST CENTURY ECKHARD J. SCHNABEL* Abstract: The Book of Acts, Paul’s letters, 1 Peter, Hebrews, and Revelation attest to nu- merous incidents of persecution, which are attested for most provinces of the Roman empire, triggered by a wide variety of causes and connected with a wide variety of charges against the fol- lowers of Jesus. This essay surveys the twenty-seven specific incidents of and general references to persecution of Christians in the NT, with a focus on geographical, chronological, and legal matters. Key words: persecution, mission, hostility, opposition, Jerusalem, Rome, Peter, Paul, Acts, Hebrews, Revelation This essay seeks to survey the evidence in the NT for instances of the perse- cution of Jesus’ earliest followers in their historical and chronological contexts without attempting to provide a comprehensive analysis of each incident. The Greek term diōgmos that several NT authors use, usually translated as “persecu- tion,”1 is defined as “a program or process designed to harass and oppress some- one.”2 The term “persecution” is used here to describe the aggressive harassment and deliberate ill-treatment of the followers of Jesus, ranging from verbal abuse, denunciation before local magistrates, initiating court proceedings to beatings, flog- ging, banishment from a city, execution, and lynch killings. I. PERSECUTION IN JUDEA, SYRIA, AND NABATEA (AD 30–38/40) 1. Persecution in Jerusalem, Judea (I). Priests in Jerusalem, the captain of the tem- ple, and Sadducees arrested the apostles Peter and John who spoke to a crowd of * Eckhard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Divine Narratives in Xenophon's Anabasis
    Histos 10 (2016) 85–110 DIVINE NARRATIVES IN XENOPHON’S ANABASIS* Abstract: This paper builds on recent work that has focused on the interplay between Xeno- phon the narrator and Xenophon the character in the Anabasis. It illustrates how crucial the divine is in the construction of Xenophon’s character and the overall shape of the narrative. By referring to oracles, dreams and sacrifices, as well as his divine estate at Scillus, Xeno- phon the narrator contributes substantively towards wider thematic concerns in the narra- tive: the meaningful rôle of the divine in warfare; Xenophon’s stellar record during this opaque foreign campaign, and the signal connection between piety and good leadership. Keywords: Xenophon, Anabasis, divine, leadership, narrator, religion οὐ μόνον ἐς Πέρσας ἀνέβη Ξενοφῶν διὰ Κῦρον, ἀλλ' ἄνοδον ζητῶν ἐς Διὸς ἥτις ἄγοι. Not only on account of Cyrus did Xenophon march up towards Persia, but also seeking a road that would lead to Zeus. —Diogenes Laertius1 begin this paper by quoting from one of Xenophon’s most influential modern readers, J. K. Anderson, specifically his interpretation of Xeno- Iphon’s attitude towards supernatural phenomena: Xenophon’s education in religion and politics, whatever it may have owed to Socrates, was, like his moral instruction, not complicated by abstract speculations. Throughout his life, Xenophon remained the sort of conservative whose acceptance of the doctrines and principles that he has inherited seems either unintelligent, or dishonest, or both, to those who do not share them.2 * A special vote of thanks must go to Joe Skinner and the Classics and Ancient History department at the University of Newcastle for first inviting me to give this paper.
    [Show full text]