DOCSLIB.ORG

Data, Metrics and Monitoring in CGIAR – a Strategic Study December 2014 Cover Image: Courtesy Neil Palmer/CIAT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Data, Metrics and Monitoring in CGIAR – a Strategic Study December 2014 Cover Image: Courtesy Neil Palmer/CIAT Data, metrics and monitoring in CGIAR – a strategic study December 2014 Cover image: courtesy Neil Palmer/CIAT The ISPC encourages appropriate use of its published information, including quotation, but asks that the source be acknowledged. The recommended reference for this publication is: ISPC. 2014. Data, metrics and monitoring in CGIAR – a strategic study. Rome, Italy, CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council (ISPC). 88 pp. Data, metrics and monitoring in CGIAR – a strategic study i Contents Acronyms and abbreviations .............................................................................................................................................................iii I. ISPC Synthesis and Commentary ...........................................................................................................................1 Background and rationale of the study .............................................................................................................................. 3 ISPC commentary on key findings and recommendations of the study .................................................................. 4 II. Panel Report: Data, metrics and monitoring in CGIAR – A strategic study ................................................... 11 Preface ....................................................................................................................................................................................................12 Executive summary .............................................................................................................................................................................13 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................16 1.1 What do metrics mean in the context of this report? ...........................................................................................17 1.2 Why are metrics needed? ............................................................................................................................................17 2. An assessment of the current issues for CGIAR in developing a coherent framework ...........................................18 2.1 A summary of responses to a survey of CRPs on data, metrics and indicators ..........................................18 2.2 How the CRPs have approached program-level indicators .............................................................................19 2.3 Gaps and challenges .....................................................................................................................................................20 3. Criteria for selection of indicators...............................................................................................................................................23 3.1 Simple metrics .................................................................................................................................................................23 3.2 Composite indicators ....................................................................................................................................................23 3.3 Composite indicators: The example of total factor productivity (TFP) ...........................................................24 3.4 Selecting indicators from an understanding of the theory of change ............................................................27 3.5 The feasibility of using national or global statistics ..............................................................................................29 3.6 Linking metrics and indicators across scales and levels ...................................................................................29 4. CGIAR metrics .................................................................................................................................................................................31 4.1 Indicators of IDOs and SLOs, and their relationships ..........................................................................................31 4.2 Candidate metrics and indicators for the CGIAR SLOs.......................................................................................32 4.3 Intermediate development outcomes .....................................................................................................................34 4.4 Indicators of ‘difficult’ criteria ......................................................................................................................................36 4.5 Alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals .........................................................................................36 4.6 Foresight ...........................................................................................................................................................................39 4.7 Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................39 5. Data management .........................................................................................................................................................................41 5.1 Emerging trends in agricultural research and data ..............................................................................................41 5.2 Big data ..............................................................................................................................................................................41 Data, metrics and monitoring in CGIAR – a strategic study ii 5.3 Meta analysis, data annotation and potentials for interaction between data sets ....................................43 5.4 What has been done: Success stories.....................................................................................................................44 5.5 Opportunities for providing greater access to research data ..........................................................................44 5.6 CGIAR developments in open access and data management ........................................................................45 5.7 Creating systematic data sets ....................................................................................................................................47 5.8 Implications for data collection, collation and storage .......................................................................................48 5.9 The ethics of data use ...................................................................................................................................................48 6. Monitoring – Roles and responsibilities ..................................................................................................................................49 6.1 Data needs and responsibilities ................................................................................................................................49 6.2 Baseline studies ..............................................................................................................................................................50 6.3 Other initiatives on monitoring agriculture, land use, health and poverty ....................................................51 6.4 Use of metrics and indicators for accountability ...................................................................................................51 7. CGIAR metrics and indicator systems as an integrating framework ..............................................................................53 8. Conclusions and recommendations ........................................................................................................................................55 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................59 Annexes Annex 1. Glossary of terms and definitions ....................................................................................................................64 Annex 2. Summary of findings of a questionnaire survey conducted in October 2013 on CRP metrics .........................................................................................................................................................................66 Annex 3. Specific metrics/indicators used/planned for monitoring progress (CRP metrics survey questionnaire October 2013) .............................................................................................................................................73 Annex 4. Estimates of the size and scale of impact in IDO indicators from the three most advanced research areas (Extracted from A4NH CRP Concept Note) ..................................................................76 Annex 5. List of selected monitoring and metrics initiatives relevant to CGIAR mission .................................77 Annex 6. Further examples of long-term data collection projects ..........................................................................81 Annex 7. Common IDOs among the CRPs – Links with SLOs taken from the common IDO table in the April 2014 guidelines .................................................................................................................................................83
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DELIVERABLE D3.2 Survey of Data Models, Ontologies and Standards in the Wider Energy Efficient Buildings Domain
    Ref. Ares(2019)5483631 - 30/08/2019 Project Acronym: BIMERR Project Full Title: BIM-based holistic tools for Energy-driven Renovation of existing Residences Grant Agreement: 820621 Project Duration: 42 months DELIVERABLE D3.2 Survey of data models, ontologies and standards in the wider Energy Efficient Buildings domain Deliverable Status: Final File Name: D3.2. Survey of data models ontologies and standards v1.0.docx Due Date: 31/08/2019 (M8) Submission Date: 30/08/2019 (M8) Task Leader: UPM (T3.2) Dissemination level Public X Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission Services) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement n°820621 The BIMERR project consortium is composed of: Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung FIT Germany E.V. CERTH Ethniko Kentro Erevnas Kai Technologikis Anaptyxis Greece UPM Universidad Politecnica De Madrid Spain UBITECH Ubitech Limited Cyprus SUITE5 Suite5 Data Intelligence Solutions Limited Cyprus Hypertech (Chaipertek) Anonymos Viomichaniki Emporiki Etaireia HYPERTECH Greece Pliroforikis Kai Neon Technologion MERIT Merit Consulting House Sprl Belgium XYLEM Xylem Science And Technology Management Gmbh Austria GU Glassup Srl Italy Anonymos Etaireia Kataskevon Technikon Ergon, Emporikon CONKAT Greece Viomichanikonkai Nautiliakon Epicheiriseon Kon'kat BOC Boc Asset Management Gmbh Austria BX Budimex Sa Poland UOP University Of Peloponnese Greece EXE Exergy Ltd United Kingdom HWU Heriot-Watt University United Kingdom NT Novitech As Slovakia FER Ferrovial Agroman S.A Spain Disclaimer BIMERR project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement n°820621.
    [Show full text]
  • ADMS Issues 09 February 2012 Proposed Proposed Category JIRA Description Action Resolution
    ADMS Issues 09 February 2012 Proposed Proposed Category JIRA Description Action Resolution Joinup issues ISACV-229 Publish specification in more accessible format than PDF Accept Move to Joinup issues ISACV-234 Don't ask for participation in survey for every anonymous download Accept Move to Joinup issues Editorial issues Simple text and diagram suggestions ISACV-187 UML diagram for customization may be confusing Accept Remove diagram. ISACV-224 Check spelling of "Licence" throughout Accept Align spelling. ISACV-236 Add column data type to tables in 5.4 and 5.5 Accept Add columns. ISACV-256 Improve terms and definitions Accept Check, align, add clarifications. ISACV-261 Change "eGovernment Data" to "eGovernment Primary Resources" Accept Change phrase. ISACV-262 Ordering of properties Reject ISACV-245 Align element names in mapping sheet with specifications Accept Align names. ISACV-266 Some relationships in the model diagram are not clearly visible Accept Redraft diagram. ISACV-269 Textual changes in section 5.6 Accept Change text. ISACV-212 Consider renaming release into artefact Decide Change name to "Artefact". ISACV-222 Status "Published" may be confusing Decide Change name to "Completed". Clarifications ISACV-235 Dates and version numbers on ADMS examples are confusing Accept Add clarifications. ISACV-255 Better define what material ADMS can be used for Accept Add clarifications. ISACV-259 Better define responsibility of Publisher Accept Add clarifications. General feedback ISACV-110 To provide further comments on ADMS use cases Keep Provide feedback. ISACV-120 To verify list of Asset Types in mapping exercise and public comment Keep Provide feedback. Use cases ISACV-258 Questioning assignment of importance to attributes in Use case Accept Add clarifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Matching and Linking Large Ontologies
    Framework for Matching and Linking Large Ontologies Kow Weng Onn 1, Michelle Lim Sien Niu 1, Gudrun Johannsen 2, Johannes Keizer 2, Dickson Lukose 1, 1MIMOS Berhad Technology Park Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 57000 {kwonn | michelle.lim | dickson.lukose}@mimos.my 2The Food and Agricultural Organization of UN (FAO), Rome, Italy {Gudrun.Johannsen| Johannes.Keizer}@fao.org Abstract. The Linked Open Data (LOD) initiative is the first large-scale attempt at realizing the Semantic Web vision of Tim Berners-Lee. As of September 2011, there are almost 300 knowledge bases linked together and available for public access through both web browsers as well as semantic applications. However, the task of building the links between knowledge bases is still a laborious manual task and as the LOD cloud continues to grow rapidly, the task becomes more daunting. This paper looks at the AGROVOC thesaurus developed and maintained by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO), and how a framework can be developed to semi- automatically discover links between AGROVOC and other knowledge bases on the LOD. Keywords: Linked Open Data, Ontology Matching, AGROVOC Thesaurus 1 Introduction The Linked Open Data (LOD) initiative is the first large-scale attempt at fulfilling the Semantic Web vision of Tim Berners-Lee [25].However, despite having a large number of datasets and knowledge in the form of RDF triples, there is still a lack of links between the various datasets. According to the State of the LOD Cloud website [24], the number of datasets as at September 2011 is 295 with over 31 billion triples.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Data Management, Sharing and Services for Agriculture Development ©Adobe Stock/Only Kim Farm Data Management, Sharing and Services for Agriculture Development
    Chapter 0: Name of chapter A Farm data management, sharing and services for agriculture development ©Adobe Stock/only_kim Farm data management, sharing and services for agriculture development Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2021 Required citation: The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information FAO. 2021. product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Farm data management, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning sharing and services the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its for agriculture authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dashed development. Rome. lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be https://doi.org/10.4060/ full agreement. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, cb2840en whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-133837-7 © FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2009 Vol
    Spatial Data Infrastructure – Africa Newsletter SDI-Africa Newsletter February 2009 Vol. 8, No. 2 Spatial Data Infrastructure - Africa (SDI-Africa) is a To subscribe to SDI-Africa, please do so online at: free, electronic newsletter for people interested in http://www.gsdi.org/newslist/gsdisubscribe.asp GIS, remote sensing, and data management in Africa. Published monthly since May 2002, it raises To unsubscribe, or change your email address: awareness and provides useful information to http://www.gsdi.org/newslist/gsdisunsubscribe.asp strengthen SDI efforts and support synchronization Please mention SDI-Africa as a source of of regional activities. ECA/CODIST-Geo, information in correspondence you may have RCMRD/SERVIR, RECTAS, AARSE, H EIS-AFRICA H, about items in this issue. SDI-EA, and MadMappers are some of the other regional groups promoting SDI development. The SDI-Africa newsletter is prepared for the GSDI Association by the Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD) in Nairobi, Kenya. RCMRD builds capacity in surveying and mapping, remote sensing, geographic information systems, and natural resources assessment and management. RCMRD has been active in SDI in Africa through its contributions to the African Geodetic Reference Frame (AFREF) and SERVIR-Africa, a regional visualization and monitoring system initiative. RCMRD also implements projects on behalf of its member States and development partners. If you have news or information related to GIS, remote sensing, and spatial data infrastructure that you would like to highlight (e.g., workshop announcements, publications, reports, websites of interest, etc.), kindly send them in by the 25th of each month. I’d be happy to include your news in the newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Nutrition Data in the Land Portal and the Global Nutrition Report: a Gap Exploration Report
    GODAN ACTION LEARNING PAPER Land and nutrition data in the Land Portal and the Global Nutrition Report: a gap exploration report Valeria Pesce Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR) Lisette Mey Land Portal 30 June 2018 Pauline L’Hénaff Open Data Institute (ODI) Carlos Tejo-Alonso Land Portal GODAN ACTION LEARNING PAPER •••• LAND AND NUTRITION DATA: A GAP EXPLORATION REPORT Executive summary GODAN Action supports data users, producers and The main conclusions drawn from the report are that intermediaries to effectively engage with open data and maximise its potential for impact in the agriculture and • The two use cases present many similarities. They nutrition sectors. In particular, we work to strengthen both aggregate data from secondary sources, capacity, to promote common standards and best practice, already partly normalised by global agencies; they and to improve how we measure impact. both aggregate data around specific indicators; they aggregate from datasets with a similar structure This gap analysis report is the third in a series which (indicator, country, year, value). has examined gaps in data standards. The first version of the report examined gaps in agriculture and food data • The identified gaps in data standardisation are (Pesce, Kayumbi, Tennison, Mey, and Zervas: 2016) very similar. The names of countries and regions in data sources are not standardised or they are A second version (Pesce, Tennison, Dodds and Zervas: standardised according to different conventions; the 2017), in line with the 2017 project focus on weather data names of the variables do not follow any convention; and related use cases, examined the situation in the area indicators are represented by strings and may of data standards for weather data (and closely related change over the years (both their names and the geospatial data), and particularly focused on weather measurement methods).
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Data Standards for Land and Nutrition Data
    GODAN ACTION LEARNING PAPER A survey of data standards for land and nutrition data Valeria Pesce Global Forum on Agricultural Research and Innovation (GFAR) Lisette Mey Land Portal 30 April 2018 Pauline L’Hénaff Open Data Institute (ODI) Carlos Tejo-Alonso Land Portal GODAN ACTION LEARNING PAPER •••• A SURVEY OF DATA STANDARDS FOR LAND AND NUTRITION DATA Executive summary GODAN Action supports data users, producers and through statistics and surveys and elaborated through intermediaries to effectively engage with open data and projections. maximise its potential for impact in the agriculture and nutrition sectors. In particular, we work to strengthen On the other hand, the truly topic-specific data standards capacity, to promote common standards and best practice, are the data dictionaries, code lists and the classification and to improve how we measure impact. schemes used for each specific type of data. This explains why the majority of the data standards identified for these This report is a short accompanying document to the two thematic topics are value vocabularies, like code GODAN Action Map of Data Standards (http://vest. lists and classification schemes. However, beyond a few agrisemantics.org) which now includes two new sections formalised classifications, most of the standardisation dedicated to data standards relevant for the two thematic work in these areas is done through recommendations topics, which are the GODAN Action project focuses in and guidelines issued by authoritative bodies. its second year: land data and nutrition data. A more in-depth analysis of the data standards and Links to the two new sections are on the homepage of standardisation gaps in the areas of land data and nutrition the Map (http://vest.agrisemantics.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Rupert Herbert-Burns Phd Thesis
    PETROLEUM GEOPOLITICS : A FRAMEWORK OF ANALYSIS Rupert Herbert-Burns A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2012 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/4035 This item is protected by original copyright Petroleum Geopolitics: A Framework of Analysis Rupert Herbert-Burns A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D at the University of St. Andrews April 2011 Abstract The playing field upon which actors, both state and non-state, develop strategies to secure existing supplies of oil and seek access to new ones is as systemically, politically and strategically complex is as it is geographically vast. In considering this activity, the terminology used by pundits and journalists to describe the significance of issues such as oil demand, the complexities of access to petroleum and concerns over security threats to supplies of oil is familiar. Juxtapositions such as the ‘geopolitics of oil’, ‘energy geopolitics’, the ‘geopolitics of resource wars’ and the ‘geopolitics of oil and gas’ are all familiar. But what do they mean when they use ‘geopolitics’ in this context? Thus, by extension, can petroleum geopolitics - a hybrid conceptual construction used in this thesis - be disassembled into its component parts, analysed and systematically understood. This is the aim of this thesis. This thesis contends that the very nature of oil and gas reserves, the processes of exploration and production, and the means that govern and characterise the transportation of petroleum overland and by sea is inherently geopolitical - that some core features of geopolitical theory and key geopolitical concepts are pivotal in determining the ontology and process of the international oil business.
    [Show full text]
  • Neon Methodology for Building Ontology Networks: Specification, Scheduling and Reuse I María Del Carmen Suárez De Figueroa Baonza
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID FACULTAD DE INFORMÁTICA DEPARTAMENTO DE INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL DOCTORAL THESIS NeOn Methodology for Building Ontology Networks: Specification, Scheduling and Reuse Author: María del Carmen Suárez de Figueroa Baonza Advisors: Prof. Dr. Asunción Gómez Pérez Dr. Mariano Fernández López June 2010 Tribunal nombrado por el Magfco. y Excmo. Sr. Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, el día...............de.............................de 20...... Presidente: Vocal: ____________ Vocal: Vocal: Secretario: Suplente: Suplente: Realizado el acto de defensa y lectura de la Tesis el día..........de........................de 20.... en la E.T.S.I. /Facultad.................................................... EL PRESIDENTE LOS VOCALES EL SECRETARIO Para Iván. Para mis padres y mi hermana Cris. Agradecimientos Aunque esta página aparece como una de las primeras en mi tesis doctoral, en realidad es la última que he escrito. Ha sido la última página de un largo periodo de mi vida. Periodo en el que he aprendido muchas cosas, en el que ha habido momentos de desesperación y también momentos de felicidad. Periodo que ahora acaba, y que dejará paso, sin duda, a otra etapa nueva, quien sabe si mejor o peor, pero sobre todo nueva. Reflexiono ahora sobre este largo periodo de mi vida, en el que he dedicado mi tiempo y esfuerzo al desarrollo de esta tesis doctoral. Se que todo hubiera sido más difícil sin las personas que han estado a mi lado en algún momento de esta etapa de mi vida. Quiero agradecer su confianza, apoyo y cercanía a mi directora, Asun. Gracias por todas esas discusiones de investigación que hemos tenido y que han sido claves tanto en el nacimiento como en el desarrollo de esta tesis doctoral.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOD and AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION of the UNITED NATIONS Terms of Reference for Consultant
    FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Terms of Reference for Consultant Job Title: Information Management Specialist Division/Department: Office for Communications, Partnerships and Advocacy (OCP) Programme/Project Number: FAO Country Profiles Location: Rome, Italy Expected Start Date of Assignment: As soon as possible Duration: 6 months Reports to Title: Chief, Internet and Internal Communications GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TASK(S) AND OBJECTIVES TO BE ACHIEVED The FAO Country Profiles (FCP) portal www.fao.org/countryprofiles/ , provides a one-stop access to a vast amount of information and data available on the FAO Web Site relevant to, and associated with, each FAO member country. In this context, the FAO geopolitical ontology (http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/geoinfo/ ) and related services have been developed to facilitate data exchange and sharing in a standardized manner among systems managing information about countries and/or regions. Under the overall guidance of the Chief OCPCI and the direct supervision of the FCP manager, the consultant will participate in the maintenance and further development of the FAO Geopolitical Ontology, and in particular will: • Maintain and further develop the Geopolitical ontology (OWL and RDF versions) as well as its linkages with other resources; • Maintain and further develop ontology services (module maker and web services) and software for consistency checking and maintenance operations; • Consult with internal FAO users and analyze feedback for enhancing the usability and deployment of the ontology and its utilization through the FAO Country Profiles portal; • Participate in the creation of contents and quality assurance tasks related to the FAO Country profiles portal and products; • Analyze technical options and data flows and propose improvements to the geopolitical ontology maintenance and publishing processes.
    [Show full text]
  • STIDS Conference October 24, 2012
    STIDS Conference October 24, 2012 Gramm Richardson Elli Schwarz U.S. Department of Defense SRA International [email protected] [email protected] Country Code Sets U.S. Government Census Schedule C Used by the US Census Bureau as well as the Army Corps of Engineers. Treasury International Capital Reporting Designations identifying countries in data files on international portfolio capital movements reported to the US Treasury Department via the Treasury International Capital reporting system. GSA Geographic Locator Codes Used by US federal agencies for reporting data to the Federal Real Property Profile. NGA Geopolitical Codes (and Codes for political entities in the NGA GEOnet Names Server dependencies) (Formerly FIPS 10-4). Country Code Sets International Orgaizations ISO 3166-1, ISO 3166-2 Entities which are members of the UN or one of its specialized agencies and parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice, or registered by the UN Statistics Division. Part 2 of the standard includes dependencies of the entities in Part 1. International Olympic Committee Codes identifying the National Olympic Committees/National Teams participating in the Olympics. IANA Top-Level Domains Top level domains used in web addresses like .com, .cc, .uk, . РФ, or .中国 UN FAO Geopolitical Ontology AGROVOC, FAOSTAT, FAOTERM - code sets used for agricultural statistics and projects purposes. UN M.49 Area Codes Used by the United Nations for statistical purposes. Country Code Sets Industry ITU-T e.164 Recommendation that defines structure for telephone numbers, including country dialing codes. ITU-T e.212 Defines the code used in the Mobile Country Code Portion of an IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identifier).
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Ocean Rising: Maritime Security and Policy Challenges
    Indian Ocean Rising: Maritime Security and Policy Challenges Edited by David Michel and Russell Sticklor JULY 2012 Indian Ocean Rising: Maritime Security and Policy Challenges Edited by David Michel and Russell Sticklor JULY 2012 Copyright © 2012 Stimson ISBN: 978-0-9836674-6-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from Stimson. Stimson 1111 19th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.223.5956 Fax: 202.238.9604 www.stimson.org Preface The Indian Ocean Rising project began in early 2011 as a research initiative exploring the many policy challenges and opportunities facing the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea as these areas emerge as central theaters of 21st century geopolitics. In particular, the project has sought to understand the role that emerging military, commercial, environmental, and technological trends will play in shaping relationships between major regional and extra- regional powers—among them China, the European Union, India, Iran, and the United States—in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), while also examining the various ways that the intertwining forces of economic growth, natural resource development, and climate change will impact coastal communities of the Indian Ocean littoral in the coming years and decades. Under the sponsorship of the National Intelligence Council, the Environmental Security program at Stimson has helmed the Indian Ocean Rising initiative, building upon a large body of previous research on Indian Ocean maritime issues conducted as part of Stimson’s Regional Voices: Transnational Challenges project. As with Regional Voices, the Indian Ocean Rising project has drawn on the expertise of the Stimson Center’s extended family of in-house experts and field consultants, who together analyzed various facets of maritime- and coastal-zone security.
    [Show full text]