DOCSLIB.ORG

Ombudsmanthe European

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ombudsmanthe European 41ce86_cover 05-08-2005 09:21 Pagina 1 9 789295 022850 ISBN 92-95022-85-8 OmbudsmanThe European Origins, Establishment, Evolution QK-65-05-985-EN-C European Ombudsman 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman BP 403 F-67001 Strasbourg Cedex Tel.: +33 3 88 17 23 13 Fax: +33 3 88 17 90 62 [email protected] http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int The European Ombudsman • Origins, Establishment, Evolution Commemorative volume published on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the institution OmbudsmanThe European Origins, Establishment, Evolution Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg © 2005 The European Ombudsman and the authors All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are those of the individual authors. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005 ISBN 92-95022-85-8 Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER Contents Introduction P. Nikiforos Diamandouros 1 1 Trends Leading to the Establishment of a European Ombudsman Hans Gammeltoft-Hansen 13 2 The Spanish Proposal to the Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union Carlos Moreiro González 27 3 The Danish Proposal to the Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union Peter Biering 38 4 The Process of Drafting the European Ombudsman’s Statute Ezio Perillo 52 5 The Early Years of the European Ombudsman Jacob Söderman 83 6 The European Ombudsman: Protecting Citizens’ Rights and Strengthening Parliamentary Scrutiny Paul Magnette 106 iv Contents 7 Parallel Functions and Co-operation: the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions and the European Ombudsman Saverio Baviera 126 8 The Policy-Relationship between the European Ombudsman and the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions Eddy Newman 143 9 Safeguarding the Rights of European Citizens: the European Commission Working with the European Ombudsman Anita Gradin and Ranveig Jacobsson 162 10 The European Commission’s Internal Procedure for Dealing with the European Ombudsman’s Inquiries Jean-Claude Eeckhout and Philippe Godts 167 11 Special Reports Submitted by the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament Roy Perry 185 12 Holding the Administration Accountable in Respect of its Discretionary Powers: the Roles and Approaches of the Court, the Parliament and the European Ombudsman Gregorio Garzón Clariana 191 13 The European Ombudsman’s Resources - the Budget and Related Issues Juan Manuel Fabra Vallès 210 14 Reflections on the Future Role of the Ombudsman in a Changing Europe P. Nikiforos Diamandouros 217 Contents v Annex I: Key Documents and References 241 Annex II: The Spanish Proposal for a European Ombudsman 249 Annex III: The Danish Proposal for a European Ombudsman 252 Annex IV: The Treaty Basis for the European Ombudsman 254 Annex V: The Statute of the European Ombudsman 256 Contributors 264 Introduction P. Nikiforos Diamandouros 1 “...[t]he work of the Ombudsman should focus on helping European citizens and others entitled to apply to the Ombudsman, to exercise their rights fully and, in so doing, to give the European administra- tion a more human face”. (Jacob Söderman, the first European Ombudsman, during his solemn undertaking before the Court of Justice of the European Communities, 27 September 1995.) When the first European Ombudsman, Jacob Söderman, was elect- ed by the European Parliament on 12 July 1995, a new era in the his- tory of the European Union began to unfold. The Maastricht Treaty on European Union, adopted three years previously, had created the institution of Ombudsman and had empowered it “...to receive com- plaints from any citizen of the Union or any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies”. On 27 September 1995, assisted by two mem- bers of staff, Mr Söderman took up his duties. While Mr Söderman’s solemn undertaking before the Court of Justice that day can be seen as the birth of the European Ombudsman institution, and while its conception can be dated to the signing of the Maastricht Treaty on 7 February 1992, the idea of creating an ombudsman at the European level had already been discussed for over a decade before the Maastricht Treaty was drafted. In fact, the first proposal, by the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament, was voted in May 1979. 1 In preparing this introduction, I collaborated closely with Ben Hagard, Joint Head of the European Ombudsman’s Communications Sector. I am grateful for his invaluable assistance and for the time and energy he devoted to this task. 2 P. Nikiforos Diamandouros In order to understand the evolution of the European Ombudsman into the institution that I have the privilege of leading today, it is nec- essary to study not only the first decade of its existence, but also the decade and a half that preceded the institution’s creation. It is only in its historical context, and in terms of the many and conflicting options that presented themselves throughout the last quarter centu- ry, that the genesis and subsequent development of the institution can be fully understood. Mindful of the relatively small number of attempts that had hither- to been made to record the steps leading up to the creation of the European Ombudsman and of the institution’s early years, and equally aware that much of the detailed knowledge needed to attempt such an exercise was limited to those actors who had been centrally involved in the project at the time, I decided to host a work- shop in Strasbourg to focus on the origins and establishment of the European Ombudsman institution and to evaluate its development. The “Founders’ Workshop”, as it became known, was held on 25 and 26 June 2004 and brought together a dozen key individuals involved at the various stages of the institution’s history and pre-history, as well as two academics who had both extensively studied the institution during the last decade. The Founders’ Workshop aimed to build up a complete picture of events, to uncover as many of the central doc- uments involved as possible, and thus to assemble a repository of knowledge that could not only be of historical value to researchers in the future, but could also potentially be of benefit to policy makers and those more directly involved in leading the institution forward. The Workshop was divided into three thematic sessions, covering the origins of the Maastricht Treaty provisions on citizenship in gen- eral and the European Ombudsman in particular, the drafting of the European Ombudsman’s Statute and the establishment of the Ombudsman’s office. For the first session, on the origins of the Treaty provisions, the Workshop benefited greatly from the presence of Carlos Moreiro González, Professor of European Community law at the Carlos III University in Madrid, and of Peter Biering, a diplomat involved in the negotiations leading to the Danish Treaty proposal, who were able to shed light respectively on the steps leading up to, and the thinking behind, the Spanish and Danish government proposals for the establishment of an ombudsman at the European level. As the great French political thinker and historian Alexis de Tocqueville so Introduction 3 accurately observed, “History is a gallery of pictures in which there are few originals and many copies” 2. The presence of the National Ombudsman of Denmark, Hans Gammeltoft-Hansen, who had been a key participant in the negotiations leading to the creation of the European Ombudsman, and whose institution has served as a model for ombudsman offices the world over, was therefore of great benefit. In the second session, on the drafting of the European Ombudsman’s Statute, the detailed recollections of Ezio Perillo, the European Parliament official responsible for the work on the Statute of the European Ombudsman within the legal service of the European Parliament, together with the European Commission per- spective provided by Jean-Claude Eeckhout, former Director at the European Commission responsible for relations with the European Parliament and the European Ombudsman between 1985 and 2001, enabled us all to better understand the detailed, complex and sensi- tive negotiations and compromises that preceded the establishment of the European Ombudsman and shaped its scope and working methods. Gregorio Garzón Clariana, the Head of the European Parliament’s Legal Service since 1994, provided a useful framework for the third session, on the establishment of the Ombudsman’s office, by identi- fying two key themes for discussion - the appointment of the Ombudsman and the establishment of his office, on the one hand, and the procedures for dealing with complaints and the review crite- ria on the other. The appointment of the first Ombudsman turned out to be a rather long and drawn-out affair, with over a year elapsing between the formal adoption of the Ombudsman’s Statute by the European Parliament in March 1994 and the election of the first Ombudsman in July 1995. The Head of Secretariat of the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions between 1989 and 1998, Saverio Baviera, and the Chairman of the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament from 1994 to 1997, Eddy Newman, were ideally placed to present, from both a procedural and a political point of view, the circumstances related to the appointment of the first Ombudsman. In terms of the establishment of the office, Juan Manuel Fabra Vallès, Member of the European Parliament between 1994 and 2000 and President of the European Court of Auditors 2 Alexis de Tocqueville, L’Ancien régime et la Révolution, Paris, 1856, Chapter VI. 4 P. Nikiforos Diamandouros between 2002 and 2005, addressed the issue from a budgetary per- spective. Once the institution had been established and the first Ombudsman had taken office, the primary task of the Ombudsman, to deal with complaints, began immediately.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Speech by the European Ombudsman, P. Nikiforos Diamandouros, on the Occasion of the Formal Dinner with the EU Institutions, Bodi
    European Ombudsman Speech by the European Ombudsman, P. Nikiforos Diamandouros, on the Occasion of the Formal Dinner with the EU Institutions, Bodies and Agencies to Mark the 10th Anniversary of the European Ombudsman Institution Historical document - 17/11/2005 Brussels, 17 November 2005 Ladies and Gentlemen! Thank you Mr President for your insightful remarks and your words of encouragement. I met with the College of Commissioners on 25 May last and was greatly encouraged by the President's support for the idea of improving co-operation with the European Ombudsman for the benefit of citizens. Since our meeting, the Commission adopted, on 1 November, a Communication, introducing a new internal procedure for responding to the Ombudsman's inquiries. This foresees individual Commissioners taking strong political ownership of each case, while maintaining the valuable role of the Secretariat General. I very much welcome this new procedure which, I understand, aims to enhance the consistency and quality of the Commission's replies, as well as to ensure prompt follow-up of the Ombudsman's recommendations and remarks. This offers a clear sign of our joint determination to work together in the coming years to ensure that citizens' rights are fully respected throughout the Union. And beyond that. Recent initiatives of the Commission - such as the European Transparency Initiative, the "Better regulation initiative" and, of course, Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate - surely bring us closer to the goal of a more open and accountable EU administration, and one that has service to citizens as its ultimate destination. As the institution that gives rise to around 70% of the Ombudsman's inquiries, it is vital that the Commission take a leading role in dealing with maladministration and in promoting a service culture with respect to citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland the Future of Europe Synopsis Nuala Ahern
    Labour was usually in Government in coalition with Fine The Future of EuropeEurope:: Perspectives Gael. from Ireland Ireland has been independent from the United Kingdom since 1922 and a Republic since 1949. Ireland was in a currency union with the UK until 1979. For a period of 30 years from 1969 until 1998 there was instability in Is there room for a European Northern Ireland which successive Irish Governments dream in a country captivated in worked to resolve and contain. EU entry in 1972 was the structures of IMF -EU backed by both centre right parties and opposed by adjustment programmes? Is more Labour, which however soon became converted to the European integration desired and European project. Sinn Fein and the small socialist feasible at all? parties are anti - Globalisation and anti EU. The Irish Greens formerly had an influential Eurosceptic wing which is decreasing and many young greens are pro EU. These were among the key questions addressed Most Unions and business organisations are Pro EU. during a seminar on the future of Europe, organised by Green European Foundation with the support of Impact of the financial and economic crisis on the Heinrich Boll Foundation and Green Foundation Ireland Ireland on November 17th in Dublin. This article is a synopsis of the seminar, written by Nuala Ahern, Ireland had a booming economy and massive growth in Chair of the Green Foundation Ireland and former the 1990’s.This turned into a housing bubble, fuelled by Green MEP. low Eurozone interest rates and a global market saturated with liquidity. A comprehensive analysis of how the Irish economy collapsed is contained in the Nyberg Report , an independent report by a Norwegian The seminar took place in Tailors’ Hall, the headquarters economist.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union
    Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union By Brian Harvey This document was commissioned by the Equality Authority and the views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Equality Authority. Preface The European Union has played a valuable role in stimulating and shaping equality strategies in Ireland over the past three decades.The majority of key equality initiatives in Ireland can trace their origins to European Union directives, European case law or European Union action programmes. This influence continues to the present moment. However, innovation and ambition in our new equality legislation – the Employment Equality Act, 1998 and the Equal Status Act, 2000 – and our related equality institutions have changed this situation to one of mutual influencing. Europe now looks to the Irish experience of implementing a multi- ground equality agenda for learning. This publication provides an introductory briefing on approaches to equality at the level of the European Union – focusing on policy, institutions and funding programmes. It seeks to resource those who are engaging with the challenge to shape European Union policy and programmes in relation to equality. It aims to assist those addressing the impact of European Union policy and programmes on Ireland or to draw benefit from this influence. It is a unique document in bringing an integrated nine-ground equality focus to policy and programmes at European Union level.We are grateful to Brian Harvey for this work in drawing all this material together in this format.We are also grateful to Jenny Bulbulia B.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Pursuant to the OSPAR Convention (Ireland – United Kingdom)
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Proceedings pursuant to the OSPAR Convention (Ireland – United Kingdom) 2 July 2003 VOLUME XXIII pp. 59-151 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006 PART II Dispute Concerning Access to Information Under Article 9 of the OSPAR Convention between Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Final Award Decision of 2 July 2003 Différend opposant l'Irlande au Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord concernant l'accès à l'information prévu par l'article 9 de la Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est (Convention OSPAR), Sentence définitive Décision du 2 juillet 2003 DISPUTE CONCERNING ACCESS TO INFORMATION UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE OSPAR CONVENTION BETWEEN IRELAND AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, FINAL AWARD, DECISION OF 2 JULY 2003 DIFFÉREND OPPOSANT L'IRLANDE AU ROYAUME-UNI DE GRANDE-BRETAGNE ET D'IRLANDE DU NORD CONCERNANT L'ACCÈS À L'INFORMATION PRÉVU PAR L'ARTICLE 9 DE LA CONVENTION POUR LA PROTECTION DU MILIEU MARIN DE L'ATLANTIQUE DU NORD-EST (CONVENTION OSPAR), SENTENCE DÉFINITIVE, DÉCISION DU 2 JUILLET 2003 Tribunal constituted pursuant to the 1992 Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic ("the OSPAR Convention"). Applicable Law: The "rules of international law" to be applied by such a Tribunal include the OSPAR Convention as well as customary international law and general principles unless and to the extent that the Parties have created a lex specialis not inconsistent with a relevant jus cogens.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2003 Annual Report 2003
    ISSN 1680-3809 6 QK-AA-04-001-EN-C T H E TH E EU RO PEA N E U M BU D SM A N O ANNUAL REPORT 2003 R O P E A N O M B U D S M A N ANNUAL REPORT 2003 Publications O厭 ce P u blication s.eu .in t EN EN www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int am407904CoverEN_BAT.indd 1 2/09/04 10:50:42 Executive summary 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction 17 COMPLAINTS TO THE OMBUDSMAN 2 Complaints to the Ombudsman 23 AN INQUIRY 3 Decisions following an inquiry 35 DECISIONS FOLLOWING 4 Relations with other institutions RELATIONS WITH of the European Union 209 OTHER INSTITUTIONS 5 Relations with ombudsmen and AND SIMILAR BODIES similar bodies 217 RELATIONS WITH OMBUDSMEN 6 Public relations 227 ANNEXES PUBLIC RELATIONS Annexes 261 © The European Ombudsman 2004 All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permi ed provided that the source is acknowledged. Photographs, unless otherwise indicated, are copyright of the European Ombudsman. The full text of the report is published on the internet at: h p://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/report/en/default.htm T HE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN P. N IKIFOROS DIAMANDOUROS Mr Pat Cox Strasbourg, 19 April 2004 President European Parliament Rue Wiertz B-1047 Brussels Mr President, In accordance with Article 195 (1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3 (8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman’s Duties, I hereby present my report for the year 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 UNNEGOTIATED TRANSITION . SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME: THE PROCESSES OF DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN GREECE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Neovi M, Karakatsanis, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Session document FINAL A5-0444/2002 9 December 2002 REPORT on the Commission White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – C5-0658/2001 – 2001/2281(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado RR\484385EN.doc PE 301.855 EN EN PE 301.855 2/31 RR\484385EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY........................................................................................................................ 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 26 RR\484385EN.doc 3/31 PE 301.855 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 14 September 2001 the Commission forwarded to Parliament its White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – 2001/2281(COS)). At the sitting of 13 December 2001 the President of Parliament announced that she had referred the White Paper to the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism as the committee
    [Show full text]
  • P. Nikiforos Diamandouros
    European Ombudsman P. Nikiforos Diamandouros Curriculum vitæ P. Nikiforos Diamandouros blev født den 25. juni 1942 i Athen, Grækenland. Fra 2003 til oktober 2013 var han Den Europæiske Unions Ombudsmand (Europæisk Ombudsmand). Fra 1998 til 2003 var han Grækenlands første nationale ombudsmand. Han er emeritus professor i komparativ politik i afdelingen for statskundskab og offentlig forvaltning ved universitetet i Athen. Fra 1995 til 1998 var han leder af og formand for Grækenlands nationale center for social forskning (EKKE). Siden 2012 har han været gæsteprofessor ved Europakollegiet (Brügge). I maj 2014 blev han valgt til det græske akademi (= det nationale akademi for kunst og videnskab). Han opnåede sin BA fra Indiana University (1963) og sin MA (1965), M.phil. (1969) og ph.d. (1972) fra Columbia University. Inden han sluttede sig til lærerstaben ved universitetet i Athen i 1988, underviste og forskede han på henholdsvis State University of New York og Columbia University (1973-78). Fra 1980 til 1983 var han ansat som chef for udvikling ved Athens College, Athen, Grækenland. Fra 1983 til 1988 var han programleder for Vesteuropa og for Nær- og Mellemøsten ved Social Science Research Council, New York. Fra 1988 til 1991 var han chef for det græske institut for internationale og strategiske studier i Athen, en policy-tænketank finansieret af Ford and MacArthur Foundations. I 1997 var han gæsteprofessor i statskundskab ved Juan March-centret for videregående studier i samfundsvidenskab (Madrid). I 2011 fik han tildelt en æresdoktorgrad ( honoris causa ) i jura ved American College of Greece. Han har været formand for Greek Political Science Association (1992-98) og Modern Greek Studies Association of the United States (1985-88).
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2021 Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas Vaida Lilionyte Manthos West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Manthos, Vaida Lilionyte, "Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas" (2021). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 8290. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8290 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas Vaida Lilionyte Manthos Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Science at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science John Kilwein, Ph.D., Chair Shauna Fisher, Ph.D. Erik S. Herron, Ph.D. Daniel Renfrew, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Llamamiento Mundial De Los Parlamentarios a Favor De La Tasa Tobin Appel Mondial Des Parlementaires Pour La Taxe Tobin Parliamen
    Parliamentarian World Call for the 'Tobin Tax' The campaign for a 'Tobin Tax' continues... 864 parliamentarians from 33 coun- However, despite the good intentions agenda. Globalisation creates wealth, tries have signed the Parliamentarian of these declarations of, no new but also a great deal of inequality. A World Call for the 'Tobin Tax'. mechanism of financing was put in 'Tobin Tax' could be the first tax of this place to reverse the decrease in public new type, leading to others of this kind Last year, following the Earth fund budgets going to development such as a tax on maritime activity. Summit in Johannesburg and the aid and to pay for universal access to International Conference on all global public goods. We invite you to continue to spread Financing for Development in the word about this appeal and to col- Monterrey, the international commu- It has never been so urgent to create a lect signatures. nity confirmed that it is imperative to more equal world, a world where find the necessary funding to guaran- poverty is not the only future for tee universal access to all the essen- millions of human beings. Peace and Harlem Désir, Glyn Ford, tial elements of a decent quality of stability in the world are also at stake. Carlos Carnero life, the ability to nourish oneself pro- "Capital Taxes, Fiscal Systems and Globalisation" perly, access to drinking water, to This is why the question of a global Intergroup of the European Parliament education, and to medicines..... solidarity tax remains at the top of the Appel mondial des parlementaires pour la taxe Tobin Le combat pour la taxe Tobin se poursuit… 864 parlementaires de 33 pays, ont signé Mais, malgré les déclarations d’inten- pour lutter contre la spéculation et les l’Appel mondial des parlementaires tions, aucun mécanisme nouveau de paradis fiscaux.
    [Show full text]
  • C. ESTABLISHMENT, ORGANISATION and OPERATION of the OFFICE Ombudsman of the OMBUDSMAN the GREEK OMBUDSMAN
    the greek C. ESTABLISHMENT, ORGANISATION AND OPERATION OF THE OFFICE ombudsman OF THE OMBUDSMAN THE GREEK OMBUDSMAN 1. ESTABLISHMENT 2. ORGANISATION AND OPERATION The establishment of the Greek Ombudsman as 2.1 INFRASTRUCTURE an independent administrative authority marks the culmination of a long quest for ways to The office of the Ombudsman occupies the improve the public sector and its relations with second and third floors of a new building at 5 the citizens. For a number of reasons, earlier Hadjiyanni Mexi Street. After a special study, a attempts proved fruitless. pilot project for Greece, the office space and Law 2477/1997 establishing the Greek surrounding area were especially prepared so as Ombudsman marked an important step in this to provide unimpeded access for people with direction. The planned constitutional special needs and, in general, for individuals with safeguarding of the Ombudsman will problems. substantially contribute to its prestige and A central goal of the Ombudsman is to create further strengthen its institutional and promote a new way of organizing a public independence. service, based on the best possible use of The office of the Ombudsman was set up in modern electronic technology, including three stages. The first stage was the selection of electronic protocol, electronic mail, and access the first Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros, to other data bases. The purpose is to increase Professor of Political Science in the Department effectiveness, transparency, and control, and to of Political Science and Public Administration at provide easy access to the Ombudsman’s the University of Athens, who assumed office on archives for the professional staff and for 1 May 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Horyzonty Polityki 2017, Vol
    Horyzonty Sotiris Mitralexis University of Cambridge & University of Winchester Polityki [email protected] DOI: 10.17399/HP.2017.082508 Horyzonty Polityki 2017, Vol. 8, No 25 Studying Contemporary Greek Neo-orientalism: the Case of the “Underdog Culture” Narrative 1 Abstract RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This paper studies the prevalence, pre‑eminence, premises and political usage of the “cultural dualism” narrative in contemporary Greece, which is predominantly attributed to Nikiforos Diamandouros. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The “cultural dualism” (“underdog culture”) reading of Modern Greece divides Greek society and po‑ litical life into an “underdog” Orthodox conservative culture and a “reformist” Western secular culture, thus forming a Neo‑orientalist schematization. The paper traces and analyses instances of this dichotomy (particularly instances in which it is presented as self‑evident, a given) in Greek academia, journalism and political discourse. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: This “underdog culture” narra‑ tive, broadly understood, is here identified as the implicit hermeneutic approach almost universally employed when studying non‑standard political and cultural thought in Greece: other forms thereof comprise the dichotomies of “normal/ non‑biased” versus “anti‑Western,” “European” versus “national‑populist,” “secular” versus “religious/Byzantine/Orthodox” etc. I proceed to analyse those and propose the term “Greek Neo‑orientalism” for their categorization. 1 I am grateful to the German Research Foundation (DFG), which provided me with the means necessary for the research behind this paper through Forschungsstipendium MI 1965/2‑1. S u g g e s t e d c i t a t i o n: Mitralexis, S. (2017). Studying Contemporary Greek Neo‑orientalism: the Case of the “Underdog Culture” Narrative.
    [Show full text]