Happy Holidays from Your Editors!
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Trix/Minitrix New Items 2017 Brochure HERE
New Items 2017 Trix. The Fascination of the Original. New Items 2017 E E © Gebr. Märklin & Cie. GmbH – All rights reserved. © Gebr. Märklin & Cie. GmbH – All rights reserved. Dear Trix Fans, Welcome to the New Year for 2017! This year we are again presenting our new items brochure with many impressive models for Minitrix, Trix H0, and Trix Express. Through all of the eras, the railroad has provided transporta- tion for business and industry. It has also left its mark on the life of entire cities and regions over many generations. It is thus no wonder that we have given special importance to freight service as models. This year we are spreading the entire range across model railroad rails. Regardless of whether it is the impressive class 42 steam locomotive of the Fifties or the latest variations of the Vectron as the TRAXX family. We are bringing impressive, prototypical trains/train New Items for MiniTrix 2017 2 – 55 New Items for Trix H0 2017 56 – 105 runs to your model railroad scenery with car sets in all eras, some of them with new tooling. However, 2017 is also the year of the “TransEuropExpress”, which seven railroads started exactly 60 years ago with the ambitious plan to bring elegant, comfortable traveling to the rails. Come with us to explore this concept through the eras New Items for Trix Express 2017 106–109 of the history of long-distance passenger service. Now, give free rein to your personal operating and collector passion and discover your favorites on the following pages. Fulfill your wishes – your local specialty dealer is waiting for your visit! MiniTrix Club Model for 2017 6– 7 MHI Exclusiv 1/2017 4 – 8 Your Trix Team wishes you much fun exploring the new items H0 Trix Club Model for 2017 58 – 59 Museumcars 117 for 2017! Trix Club 110 Reparatur-Service 118 Registration Form 113 General References 118 Trix Club Cars for 2017 111 Important Service Information 118 Trix Club Anniversary Car 112 Explanation of Symbols 119 Index to the Item Numbers 120 1 © Gebr. -
Rocky Mountain Rail Report June 2006 No
ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAIL REPORT JUNE 2006 NO. 561 ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAILROAD CLUB • ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAILROAD HISTORICAL FOUNDATION Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow – Denver Rail Transit Hosted by Bob Wilson 2006 RMRRC Events Schedule June 13, 2006 • 7:30 PM June 24 Trip: Alamosa to La Veta and Return The program will start by featuring noted local rail transit historian and Club Vice President for Projects, Darrell Arndt, on the rich history of Denver area trolleys and July 11 Meeting Dome Car Magic interurbans. Next Kristi Estes from the FasTracks office will give the group the latest information on light rail along TREX and FasTracks. Finally, Bob Briggs will finish by August 8 Meeting To Be Announced updating us on plans for commuter rail along the Wyoming-Colorado-New Mexico Front Range and the I-70 mountain corridor. Enjoy this educational program and the September 12 Meeting Excursions Of cookies and punch during the break before the program. The 60s October Event Annual Banquet Please come join us for an enjoyable, educational evening at Christ Episcopal Church at 2950 South University Boulevard, University at Bates, where there is plenty of off street November 14 Meeting Video Potpourri parking at the rear of the complex. Enter into Barnes Hall, where we hold the monthly meetings, on the mid-south side doors. Please bring a guest. All programs are December 12 Meeting Annual Meeting intended to provide an educational experience on railroading. The general public is welcome to attend. There is no charge for this meeting. 2007 RMRRC Events Schedule La Veta Pass Excursion – C&TS Railroad Side Trip January 9 Meeting To Be Announced Saturday, June 24th February 13 Meeting To Be Announced The C&TS Railroad has been called a addition, the C&TS boasts a vast sixty-four mile working museum. -
A Synthesis of Modern Rail Transportation Engineering Practices Donald D
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Open-Access* Master's Theses from the University Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln of Nebraska-Lincoln 9-1977 A Synthesis of Modern Rail Transportation Engineering Practices Donald D. Cook University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/opentheses Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Cook, Donald D., "A Synthesis of Modern Rail Transportation Engineering Practices" (1977). Open-Access* Master's Theses from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 37. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/opentheses/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open-Access* Master's Theses from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A SYNTHESIS OF MODERN RAIL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING PRACTICES by Donald D. Cook A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College in the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Department of Civil Engineering Under the Supervision of Dr. Edward R. Post Dr. Patrick J. McCoy Dr. Edward N. Wilson Lincoln, Nebraska September, 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. E. R. Post, Dr. P. T. M~Coy, and Dr. E. N. Wilson, my thesis advisory corrmittee for their assistance. Thanks are also due Sharon Nichols and Kim Seip whose typing skills saved me a great amount of anguish and Gary Steffans who assisted with the chapter on signaling. -
Registration Document 2016/17
* TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2016/17 DESCRIPTION CORPORATE 1 OF GROUP ACTIVITIES AFR 3 5 GOVERNANCE 137 Industry characteristics 4 Chairman’s report 138 Competitive position 7 Executive Committee AFR 181 Strategy 8 Statutory Auditors’ report prepared Offering 9 in accordance with Article L. 225‑235 of the French Commercial Code Research and development 15 on the report prepared by the Chairman of the Board of Alstom AFR 182 MANAGEMENT REPORT Interests of the officers 2 ON CONSOLIDATED and employees in the share capital 183 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Related‑party agreements and commitments 190 AFR FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 AFR 19 Statutory Auditors 190 Main events of fiscal year 2016/17 20 Objectives for 2020 confirmed 21 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Commercial performance 22 6 ALSTOM’S SOCIAL Orders backlog 24 RESPONSIBILITY 191 Income Statement 24 Sustainable development strategy 192 Free cash flow 26 Designing sustainable mobility solutions 200 Net Debt 27 Environmental performance 207 Equity 27 Social performance 215 Non‑GAAP financial indicators definitions 28 Relationships with external stakeholders 233 Synthesis of indicators/key figures 2016/17 244 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AFR 31 Report by one of the Statutory Auditors, 3 Consolidated income statement 32 appointed as an independent third party , on the consolidated environmental, Statutory financial statements 98 labour and social information presented in the management report 247 AFR RISK FACTORS 119 Table of compulsory CSR information AFR 250 4 Risks in relation to the economic environment -
Transportation Trips, Excursions, Special Journeys, Outings, Tours, and Milestones In, To, from Or Through New Jersey
TRANSPORTATION TRIPS, EXCURSIONS, SPECIAL JOURNEYS, OUTINGS, TOURS, AND MILESTONES IN, TO, FROM OR THROUGH NEW JERSEY Bill McKelvey, Editor, Updated to Mon., Mar. 8, 2021 INTRODUCTION This is a reference work which we hope will be useful to historians and researchers. For those researchers wanting to do a deeper dive into the history of a particular event or series of events, copious resources are given for most of the fantrips, excursions, special moves, etc. in this compilation. You may find it much easier to search for the RR, event, city, etc. you are interested in than to read the entire document. We also think it will provide interesting, educational, and sometimes entertaining reading. Perhaps it will give ideas to future fantrip or excursion leaders for trips which may still be possible. In any such work like this there is always the question of what to include or exclude or where to draw the line. Our first thought was to limit this work to railfan excursions, but that soon got broadened to include rail specials for the general public and officials, special moves, trolley trips, bus outings, waterway and canal journeys, etc. The focus has been on such trips which operated within NJ; from NJ; into NJ from other states; or, passed through NJ. We have excluded regularly scheduled tourist type rides, automobile journeys, air trips, amusement park rides, etc. NOTE: Since many of the following items were taken from promotional literature we can not guarantee that each and every trip was actually operated. Early on the railways explored and promoted special journeys for the public as a way to improve their bottom line. -
Proposal for Operator of Rail Service from Progressive Rail
January 4, 2018 Proposal for Operator of Rail Service Mr. Luis Pavel Mendez Deputy Director Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission 1523 Pacific Avenue Santa Cruz, CA 95060-3911 Dear Mr. Mendez, Progressive Rail Incorporated (“PGR”) is pleased to submit a Proposal for Operator of Rail Service in accordance with the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (“SCCRTC”) Request For Proposals (“RFP”) dated December 8, 2017. Please accept this letter as our Transmittal Letter and the enclosed booklet (“Booklet”) as a detailed supplement of information that summarizes our vision and service plan for the Santa Cruz Branch Line. In preparation for this submittal, we have performed the following activities: • An onsite inspection of the entire 32 miles of rail; • An onsite inspection of all the bridges on the Branch Line with the assistance of A.R.E., an Irvine-based railroad bridge engineering firm; • An onsite inspection of all the railroad crossings with a goal to work with the municipalities to evaluate Locomotive Horn Signal Quiet Zones from Grove Lane Crossing in Capitola to Swift Avenue in Santa Cruz; • A meeting with the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk management to explore partnerships for passenger excursions; • A meeting with Ms. Christina Watson of the Transit Authority for Monterrey County to understand their plans and progress in developing a fast rail corridor to Salinas and how the Santa Cruz Branch Line might benefit from their experiences and ongoing efforts; • Meetings with potential freight customers in Watsonville; • Engaging PGR’s existing customers within its six-state network that would consider locating on the Santa Cruz Branch Line; • Given that PGR is already a major handling carrier for Union Pacific, meeting with representatives to advise them of our aspirations to become the Operator of the Branch Line; and • Retaining two rail advisors, one of whom is very familiar with the Branch Line operations, to meet with train manufacturers to explore environmentally friendly and California-compliant locomotives and train sets. -
June 2003 Manufacturer Have Been Acquired
tion from that totaling $300! Another dona- The Official Newsletter of the tion from,Arvin Bell kicked off the fund rais- UPCOMING MEETINGS/EVENTS Roanoke Chapter, National ing drive with $100. June 19, 2003 – Regular Meeting Railway Historical Society, Inc. Two different contractors have looked over the building and provided detailed estimates. July 1, 2003 – Board Meeting Volume 35, Number 6 Samples of the roof tile, from the original July 17, 2003 – Regular Meeting June 2003 manufacturer have been acquired. The cost of the tile alone is estimated to be $150,000! August 21, 2003 – Regular Meeting And that does not include sustructure and installation. September 2, 2003 – Board Meeting The present roof on the main structure is September 18, 2003 – General Meeting considered a total loss. One contractor has recommended some changes in the design of October 7, 2003 – Board Meeting the roof to fix some original design flaws October 16, 2003 – General Meeting that created leaks. These suggested changes will not change the historical integrity and November 4, 2003 – Board Meeting apperance of the structure but will be better in reduced maintenance and long term November 20, 2003 – Annual Meeting preservation. December 2, 2003 – Board Meeting http://community.roanoke.com/RoanokeChapterNationalRailwayHistoricalSociety Turntable Times is published monthly as the newsletter of the Roanoke Chapter, National Railway Historical Society, Inc. Opinions and points of view expressed herein are those of the staff members of the Turntable Times and not necessarily reflect those of the members, officers or directors of the Chapter. Items of interest should be sent to Editor Kenny Kirkman, 590 Murphy Road, Collinsville, VA 24078-2128. -
Alstom Unveils Proposed HS2 Train Design
Alstom unveils proposed HS2 train design June 6, 2019 Alstom has unveiled its proposed design for HS2 Ltd. The train is designed to meet all of HS2 Ltd’s requirements for a world class, modern and flexible train which is as comfortable on the conventional network as it is on the new HS2 infrastructure. Alstom has market-leading high-speed rail expertise, from iconic train designs such as the TGV in France, Avelia Liberty in the USA and AGV in Italy, combined with 20 years’ experience working with Pendolino trains on the UK’s West Coast Mainline. By integrating HS2 infrastructure and the conventional network from Scotland all the way down to the south of England, HS2 will become the critical driving force in revitalising towns and cities all across the country, and especially in the midlands and the north. “Alstom’s vision is to make HS2 trains a timeless design classic, with a passenger experience that is as smooth, calm and spacious as it is high speed. Alstom is excited to unveil this proposed train for HS2, which is the most important economic regeneration project in Britain for decades. It will knit together the great cities of the midlands and the north as never before, and turbo-charge our regional economies.” said Nick Crossfield, Managing Director for Alstom in UK and Ireland. This proposed train for HS2 Ltd builds on Alstom’s unmatched experience in high speed rolling stock which includes being: the holder of the world speed record for high speed rail, at 574 km/h the only rolling stock manufacturer to win high speed train contracts on four different continents, from Korea to Italy, Morocco to the US the manufacturer whose technology has been proven on everything from France’s first TGVs to the UK’s first very high-speed train, the original Eurostar e300 The designer of a new generation of Avelia high speed trains including Avelia Liberty in the USA, Avelia Horizon in France and the Avelia AGV in Italy. -
C-Above-Below-The-Rail-Costs-Analysis-Amtrak-APT-Brightline-SEC-Data-And-Example
Attachment C Above-the-Rail Operations and Below-the-Rail Infrastructure - Cost Analysis This need to parse these distinctions is best seen when Amtrak reports a Total Assigned Cost of around $74.4 i ii per train-mile for today’s smaller long-distance passenger trains. Yet a 1969 ICC report4F to Congress determined the long-run avoidable cost to average but $6.5 ($48.4 in $2020) per train-mile in an era of longer trains, running twice daily, inclusive of infrastructure and the era’s taxed private terminals. UIC research for western European republics suggest an Above-the-Rail cost function of $29.8 per train-mileiii at similar average speeds for a modern 8-car long-distance train configurableiv for a few dollars extra for US operations. These values largely differ by the degree to which Below-the-Rail infrastructure is included and the scale. But Amtrak has long fought to survive within a federal policy blind to highway trust fund leveraging, generating Route level Operational Earnings that largely exclude 1 ½ Billionv of NEC infrastructure costsvi though federal law requires allocationvii. Thus to downgrade amenities costing millions on some routes to fund infrastructure on others is counterproductive as a consumer’s “time” can be bought nearly interchangeably through faster infrastructure or amenities that allow for increased Time-Utility while en-route for mobile work, dining, or rest to steer one to the safer option. Instead public investment should occur for Below-the-Rail infrastructure as in other Western republicsviii but at a US specific metric as automobile fuel taxes here are but a tenth elsewhere. -
Final Report SYST 495 Last
Northeast Corridor Mass Transportation System Analysis Final Report May 9th, 2019 Natalee Coffman (Co-Team Lead) Yaovi Kodjo (Co-Team Lead) Jacob Noble Jaehoon Choi Sponsored By: Dr. George Donohue GMU/CATSR Department of Systems Engineering and Operations Research 1 | Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank the Center for Air Transportation Systems Research (CATSR), specifically Professor George Donohue for his endless technical guidance and for sponsoring this project. We also thank the George Mason University Engineering Department faculty professors (Dr. Rajesh Ganesan, Hadi El Amine and Kuo-Chu Chang) for helping with our simulation and utility function approach. The authors would like to thank the Maryland Department of Transportation, specifically the Anne Arundel County Office of Transportation, for giving us the opportunity to brief our project and for providing us with constructive feedback. Our thanks go as well to Richard Cogswell from the Federal Rail Administration for giving us deep insight into the critical rail infrastructure that plagues the Northeast Corridor. Page | 2 George Mason University Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2 Executive Summary 6 Gap Analysis Methodology 7 1 - Background 9 1.1 Air Transportation 9 1.2 Rail Transportation 14 1.3 Automobile Transportation 17 2 - Statement of Work 22 2.1 Problem Statement 22 2.2 Need Statement 22 2.3 Project Scope 22 2.4 Project Mission Requirement 22 3 - Stakeholder Analysis and Tension 24 3.1 Passengers/Corridor Population 24 3.2 Competitors 24 3.3 Regulators -
Fall New Items for 2014 E
Fall New Items for 2014 E 14_2542_Maerklin_Herbstneuheiten_Katalog_081414_06_pa_Pg1.indd_14_2542_Maerklin_Herbstneuheiten_Katalog_081514_01_pa.indb 1 1 21.08.14 14:2418:44 Editorial Table of Contents Dear Märklin Fans, MHI „Exclusiv“ for H0 ..................................................... 4 MHI „Exclusiv“ for Start up ............................................. 14 This fall we are expanding train history. Experience the world of a dining MHI „Exclusiv“ for Z Gauge ............................................ 17 car up close. Turn the table lamps on and experience a galley fire with an Start up ..................................................................... 18 unsuccessful schnitzel and a conciliatory bottle of champagne. Hear it for H0 ........................................................................... 20 yourself! Christmas for H0 .......................................................... 26 Christmas for Z Gauge .................................................. 27 There are a lot of other exciting models awaiting you and of course in the Z Gauge .................................................................... 30 scales H0, Z, and 1. Naturally, there are new items from Märklin for more 1 Gauge .................................................................... 36 than just the pros. There is a lot to discover in the world of „Start up“ for 30 Years of Märklin Digital .............................................. 44 children ages 6 and above. Explanations / Table of Contents by Item Number ................. -
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 1997 / Proposed Rules
8330 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION by FRA that are different from those comments. FRA believes that a 60-day affecting other types of passenger comment period is necessary for parties Federal Railroad Administration operations. with interests that were not represented DATES: (1) Written comments: Written by the working group on passenger train 49 CFR Parts 223 and 239 comments must be received on or before emergency preparedness that has been [FRA Docket No. PTEP±1, Notice No. 1] April 25, 1997. Comments received after established by the agency under 49 that date will be considered by FRA and U.S.C. 20133. RIN 2130±AA96 the Passenger Train Emergency Background Preparedness Working Group in Passenger Train Emergency preparing the final rule to the extent The overall safety record of Preparedness possible without incurring additional conventional intercity and commuter passenger train operations in the United AGENCY: Federal Railroad expense or delay. The docket will remain open until the Working Group States has been exemplary. However, Administration (FRA), Department of accidents continue to occur, often as a Transportation (DOT). proceedings are concluded. Requests for formal extension of the comment period result of factors beyond the control of ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. must be made by April 10, 1997. the passenger railroad. Further, the rail passenger operating environment in the SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 215 of the (2) Public hearings: FRA intends to hold two public hearings, and the dates United States is rapidly changingÐ Federal Railroad Safety Authorization technology is advancing, equipment is Act of 1994, FRA proposes a rule to of these hearings will be published in a forthcoming notice in the Federal being designed for ever-higher speeds, require minimum Federal safety and many potential new operators of standards for the preparation, adoption, Register.