Members Jim Desmond, Chair Mayor, City of San Marcos (Representing North County Inland) Bill Sandke, Vice Chair Councilmember, City of Coronado (Representing South County) Georgette Gomez Councilmember, City of San Diego Ron Roberts TRANSPORTATION Supervisor, County of San Diego Bill Baber Councilmember, City of La Mesa COMMITTEE (Representing East County) Catherine Blakespear Mayor, City of Encinitas (Representing North County Coastal) AGENDA Harry Mathis Chair, Metropolitan Transit System Friday, October 20, 2017 John Aguilera Vice Chair, North County Transit District 9 a.m. to 12 noon Jim Janney SANDAG Board Room San Diego County Regional Airport Authority 401 B Street, 7th Floor Alternates San Diego Judy Ritter Mayor, City of Vista (Representing North County Inland) Mary Salas Mayor, City of Chula Vista AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS (Representing South County) Mark Kersey • Councilmember, City of San Diego 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION Bill Horn IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: AMENDMENT NO. 8 Supervisor, County of San Diego Greg Cox Supervisor, County of San Diego • 2019 SAN DIEGO FORWARD: THE REGIONAL Jennifer Mendoza PLAN – PROPOSED REVENUE CONSTRAINED Mayor Pro Tem, City of Lemon Grove (Representing East County) NETWORK SCENARIOS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Ellie Haviland Councilmember, City of Del Mar • 2018 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT (Representing North County Coastal) Lorie Bragg PROGRAM Metropolitan Transit System Bill Horn / Mark Packard North County Transit District April Boling PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING San Diego County Regional Airport Authority YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Advisory Members MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT SANDAG.ORG Rafael Castellanos / Michael Zucchet San Diego Unified Port District Cory Binns / Ann Fox Caltrans District 11 MISSION STATEMENT Erica Pinto, Jamul Allen Lawson, San Pasqual The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional Southern California Tribal decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus; makes strategic plans; obtains and allocates resources; Chairmen’s Association plans, engineers, and builds public transit; and provides information on a broad range of topics Kim Kawada pertinent to the region’s quality of life. Chief Deputy Executive Director, SANDAG
San Diego Association of Governments ⋅ 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 (619) 699-1900 ⋅ Fax (619) 699-1905 ⋅ sandag.org
Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Transportation Committee (Committee) on any item at the time the Committee is considering the item. Please complete a Request to Comment form, which is located in the rear of the room, and then present the form to the Committee Clerk seated at the front table. Members of the public may address the Committee on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. The Committee may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.
Public comments regarding the agenda can be sent to SANDAG via [email protected]. Please include the agenda item, your name, and your organization. Email comments should be received no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the Committee meeting. Any handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the Committee meeting should be received by the Committee Clerk no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the meeting.
In order to keep the public informed in an efficient manner and facilitate public participation, SANDAG also provides access to all agenda and meeting materials online at www.sandag.org/meetings. Additionally, interested persons can sign up for e-notifications via our e-distribution list either at the SANDAG website or by sending an email request to [email protected].
SANDAG operates its programs without regard to race, color, and national origin in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. SANDAG has developed procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints, and the procedures for filing a complaint are available to the public upon request. Questions concerning SANDAG nondiscrimination obligations or complaint procedures should be directed to the SANDAG General Counsel, John Kirk, at (619) 699-1997 or [email protected]. Any person who believes himself or herself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI also may file a written complaint with the Federal Transit Administration.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900 or (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905.
SANDAG agenda materials can be made available in alternative languages. To make a request, call (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Los materiales de la agenda de SANDAG están disponibles en otros idiomas. Para hacer una solicitud, llame al (619) 699-1900 al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión.
如有需要, 我们可以把SANDAG议程材料翻译成其他語言.
请在会议前至少 72 小时打电话 (619) 699-1900 提出请求.
SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or visit 511sd.com for route information. Bicycle parking is available in the parking garage of the SANDAG offices.
2 080917 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Friday, October 20, 2017
ITEM NO. RECOMMENDATION +1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES APPROVE
The Transportation Committee is asked to review and approve the minutes from its October 6, 2017, meeting.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS
Members of the public will have the opportunity to address the Transportation Committee on any issue within the jurisdiction of the Committee that is not on this agenda. Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a “Request to Speak” form and giving it to the Clerk prior to speaking. Public speakers should notify the Clerk if they have a handout for distribution to Committee members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. Committee members also may provide information and announcements under this agenda item.
CONSENT
+3. SPECIALIZED TRANSPORTATION GRANT PROGRAMS STATUS INFORMATION UPDATE (Jack Christensen)
SANDAG manages two competitive grant programs for specialized transportation projects: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) and TransNet Senior Mini-Grant. This report provides an overview of the progress made by the grant recipients in each program.
REPORTS
+4. 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: ADOPT AMENDMENT NO. 8 (Sue Alpert)
The Transportation Committee is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2018-06, approving Amendment No. 8 to the 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
+5. 2019 SAN DIEGO FORWARD: THE REGIONAL PLAN – PROPOSED RECOMMEND REVENUE CONSTRAINED NETWORK SCENARIOS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS (Phil Trom)
The Transportation Committee is asked to recommend that the Board of Directors accept the proposed process to develop the Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios for use in the development of 2019 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan, including the existing Unconstrained Transportation Network, project evaluation criteria, and project rankings from the 2015 Regional Plan.
3 +6 2018 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DISCUSSION/ (Dawn Vettese) POSSIBLE ACTION
The Transportation Committee is asked to discuss the proposed 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and either direct staff to return for further action, or recommend that the Board of Directors approve the submission of the proposed 2018 STIP to the California Transportation Commission.
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
If the five speaker limit for public comments was exceeded at the beginning of this agenda, other public comments will be taken at this time. Subjects of previous agenda items may not again be addressed under public comment.
8. UPCOMING MEETINGS INFORMATION
The next meeting of the Transportation Committee is scheduled for Friday, November 3, 2017. Please note this meeting will be held at 11 a.m. due to the holiday schedule.
9. ADJOURNMENT
+ next to an agenda item indicates an attachment
4 AGENDA ITEM NO. 17-10-1 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OCTOBER 20, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED: APPROVE
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS
OCTOBER 6, 2017
The meeting of the Transportation Committee was called to order by Chair Jim Desmond (North County Inland) at 9 a.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES (APPROVE)
Action: Upon a motion by Councilmember Bill Baber (East County), and a second by Vice Chair Bill Sandke (South County), the Transportation Committee approved the meeting minutes of September 15, 2017. Yes: Chair Desmond, Vice Chair Sandke, Councilmember Georgette Gomez (City of San Diego), Councilmember Baber, Mayor Catherine Blakespear (North County Coastal), Chair Harry Mathis (Metropolitan Transit System [MTS]), Vice Chair John Aguilera (North County Transit District [NCTD]), and Mr. Jim Janney (San Diego County Regional Airport Authority [SDCRAA]). No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: County of San Diego.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS
Nancy Cuskaden, a member of the public, submitted written comments and spoke about various legal issues.
John Wotzka, a member of the public, submitted written comments and spoke about various transportation matters.
Kathryn Rhodes, a member of the public, spoke regarding a proposed new Amazon facility location.
CHAIR’S REPORT
3. CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 2017 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE – SAN DIEGO FORWARD: THE REGIONAL PLAN (INFORMATION)
Chair Desmond introduced the item.
The California Chapter of the American Planning Association has awarded San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan with the 2017 Comprehensive Plan Award: Large Jurisdiction of Excellence.
Action: This item was presented for information.
REPORTS
4. SANDAG GO BY BIKE MINI-GRANT PROGRAM (RECOMMEND)
Jay Faught, Senior Business Analyst, presented the item.
Action: Upon a motion by Councilmember Gomez, and a second by Vice Chair Sandke, the Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors approve the evaluation criteria for the GO by BIKE Mini-Grant Program and release of the 2018 Request for Grant Applications. Yes: Chair Desmond, Vice Chair Sandke, Councilmember Gomez, Supervisor Ron Roberts (County of San Diego), Councilmember Baber, Mayor Blakespear, MTS Chair Mathis, NCTD Vice Chair Aguilera, and Mr. Janney. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.
5. PROPOSED SUBMITTALS FOR THE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT GENERATING ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE FOR REBUILDING AMERICA GRANT PROGRAMS (APPROVE)
Victoria Stackwick, Principal Government Relations Analyst, presented the item.
Action: Upon a motion by Mr. Janney, and a second by Councilmember Aguilera, the Transportation Committee approved the list of proposed SANDAG project submittals for the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2017 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery and FFY 2017 and 2018 Infrastructure for Rebuilding America Grant Programs pursuant to the prioritization criteria described in the report. Yes: Chair Desmond, Vice Chair Sandke, Councilmember Gomez, Supervisor Roberts, Councilmember Baber, Mayor Blakespear, MTS Chair Mathis, NCTD Vice Chair Aguilera, and Mr. Janney. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.
6. 2019 SAN DIEGO FORWARD: THE REGIONAL PLAN DRAFT UNCONSTRAINED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK AND PROPOSED REVENUE CONSTRAINED NETWORK SCENARIOS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS (DISCUSSION)
Phil Trom, Senior Regional Planner, presented an overview of San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan) Draft Unconstrained Transportation Network and discussed the proposed process to develop the Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios for the 2019 Regional Plan.
Kathryn Rhodes, a member of the public, spoke regarding what elements should be included in the Regional Plan.
Chair Desmond requested that this item be brought back for additional discussion on October 20, 2017.
Action: This item was presented for discussion.
2
7. TransNet SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM AND ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION GRANT PROGRAM: DRAFT CRITERIA FOR CLIMATE ACTION PLANS AND COMPLETE STREETS POLICIES (DISCUSSION)
Carolina Ilic, Senior Regional Planner, and Allison Wood, Associate Regional Planner, presented the Cycle 4 call for projects for the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and Active Transportation Grant Program. The Transportation Committee provided input on the draft criteria related to Climate Action Plans and complete streets policies.
Kathryn Rhodes, a member of the public, spoke regarding the criteria related to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
Action: This item was presented for discussion.
8. PROJECT UPDATE: NEXT GENERATION FARE COLLECTION (INFORMATION)
Sharon Cooney, Chief of Staff, MTS, provided an update on efforts to upgrade and replace the regional smart card fare collection system.
Action: This item was presented for information.
9. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no continued public comments.
10. UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next meeting of the Transportation Committee is scheduled for Friday, October 20, 2017, at 9 a.m.
11. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Desmond adjourned the meeting at 10:59 a.m.
3 Meeting Start Time: 9 a.m. Meeting Adjourned Time: 10:59 a.m.
CONFIRMED ATTENDANCE SANDAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 6, 2017
MEMBER/ JURISDICTION NAME ATTENDING ALTERNATE Catherine Blakespear Member Yes North County Coastal Ellie Haviland Alternate Yes
Jim Desmond (Chair) Member Yes North County Inland Judy Ritter Alternate Yes
Bill Baber Member Yes East County Jennifer Mendoza Alternate Yes
Bill Sandke (Vice chair) Member Yes South County Mary Salas Alternate No
Georgette Gomez Member Yes City of San Diego Mark Kersey Alternate No
Ron Roberts Member Yes
County of San Diego Bill Horn Alternate No
Greg Cox Alternate No
Harry Mathis Member Yes Metropolitan Transit System Lorie Bragg Alternate Yes
John Aguilera Member Yes
North County Transit District Bill Horn Alternate No
Mark Packard Alternate No
San Diego County Regional Airport Jim Janney Member Yes Authority April Boling Alternate No
ADVISORY MEMBERS
Rafael Castellanos Member No San Diego Unified Port District Michael Zucchet Alternate Yes
Laurie Berman Member No Caltrans Ann Fox Alternate Yes
Erica Pinto Member Yes SCTCA Allen Lawson Member No
Matt Tucker NCTD No Other Attendees Paul Jablonski MTS Yes
4 AGENDA ITEM NO. 17-10-3 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OCTOBER 20, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED: INFORMATION
SPECIALIZED TRANSPORTATION GRANT File Number 3320200 PROGRAMS STATUS UPDATE
Introduction
This report provides an update through June 30, 2017, on two competitive grant programs that SANDAG manages for specialized transportation projects and services in the San Diego region: The Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) Program, and the Senior Mini-Grant Program. The Section 5310 Program is funded by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Senior Mini-Grant Program is funded through the TransNet Extension Ordinance.
Both programs require that SANDAG conduct a competitive selection process every two years to distribute the funds. The competitive process is guided by Board Policy No. 035 for both TransNet Senior Mini-Grant and Section 5310 funding sources.
Discussion
Grant Programs Status Update
Under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, SANDAG was designated to administer the FTA Section 5310 Program. The purpose of the Section 5310 Program is to improve mobility for seniors and individuals with disabilities by removing barriers to transportation services and expanding transportation mobility options. Eligible projects include both traditional capital investment and nontraditional investment beyond the Americans with Disabilities Act complementary paratransit service. Many of the projects that were eligible under New Freedom are now eligible for funding through Section 5310. Since the Section 5310 program began in 2015, 31 projects have been awarded funding in the San Diego region, totaling almost $8 million.
The Senior Mini-Grant Program funds specialized transportation services for seniors whose special needs cannot be met by conventional transit or paratransit service. Since the Senior Mini-Grant Program began in 2009, 69 projects have been awarded funding, totaling $14.6 million.
Grant Oversight
SANDAG staff provides ongoing oversight of the Specialized Transportation Grant Program grantees through review of progress reports, project narratives, and invoices. Grantees must maintain documentation of the services provided and are inspected by SANDAG at regular monitoring visits to ensure compliance with grant agreement and service delivery requirements and Board Policy No. 035: Competitive Grant Program Procedures. This information is used to provide regular status updates to the Transportation Committee. The last report was presented at the July 21, 2017, meeting. Staff also provides annual updates to the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council on all specialized transportation grant programs and to the TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee on the Senior Mini-Grant Program.
Service Delivery Costs
Attachment 1 includes a “cost-efficiency watch list,” which compares the grantees actual cost-per-unit of service delivery to the original proposal. Grant agreements for these programs executed after January 1, 2012, include a provision where a grantee’s inability to achieve within 130 percent of its proposed cost-per-unit by the end of the sixth month of the project would trigger a requirement for the grantee to complete a recovery plan. By the end of the first year, if the grantee is still unable to achieve the 130 percent threshold, the grant agreement could be terminated. The cost-efficiency watch list identifies grantees that may be required to complete a recovery plan or are in danger of contract termination because performance is not in line with the level of service delivery included in the original proposal, per the contract requirements. There are currently two grantees on the cost-efficiency watch list:
• The City of Coronado was awarded Senior Mini-Grant funds to develop and implement a volunteer driver program to provide transportation for seniors wanting to access their new senior center. The project was in the development phase since the contract was executed and began offering rides on March 1, 2017. The data included in this report reflects significant startup costs with only four months of service. The program is fully operational and SANDAG is seeing cost-efficient outcomes. The City of Coronado submitted a draft cost recovery plan and SANDAG staff is evaluating the proposed efforts and will report next quarter.
• The City of Vista’s “Out and About” program, funded by Senior Mini-Grant funds, exceeded the 130 percent threshold in June 2017. The City of Vista is in its 14th month of service delivery. The City of Vista has maintained a level of cost-efficiency below the 130 percent threshold throughout the grant term up until now including meeting this requirement at the 6-month and 12-month milestones. The City of Vista’s current grant agreement expires on October 31, 2017, and the City was not awarded a grant in Cycle 9. Therefore, SANDAG is not requiring the City of Vista to submit a cost recovery plan for the remaining four months of the grant term. Instead staff will work closely with the City of Vista to carry out the grant term in a cost-efficient manner.
2
Service Delivery Schedule
Attachment 1 also includes a “schedule watch list,” which identifies the grantees that appear in jeopardy of not being able to fully draw down on funds without approval of an extension. Board Policy No. 035 sets forth the process to extend project completion deadlines. In accordance with Board Policy No. 035, schedule extensions of up to six months can be approved by the SANDAG Executive Director. The grantee must request the extension in writing and document previous efforts undertaken to maintain the project schedule, explain the reasons for the delay, explain why the delay is unavoidable, and demonstrate an ability to succeed in the extended time frame the grantee proposes. Extensions longer than six months require approval by the Transportation Committee. There are five projects on the “schedule watch list:”
• Mountain Health and Community Services, funded by Senior Mini-Grant funds, requested and was granted a six-month extension in April 2017. At the current draw-down rate, Mountain Health and Community Services would require an additional seven-month extension beyond its amended expiration date of December 31, 2017. If any additional time to draw down on remaining funds is needed, the Transportation Committee will be asked to consider the extension request in November 2017. An additional schedule assessment will be conducted by the end of October 2017.
• The City of Coronado’s “Out & About” Senior Mini-Grant project has only recently started delivering service. The grant is not set to expire until June 30, 2018, so any action required for an extension request would be taken at the status update presented to the Transportation Committee in spring 2018. An additional schedule assessment will be conducted at the end of March 2018.
• Facilitating Access to Coordinated Transportation (FACT), funded by both Senior Mini-Grant and Section 5310 funds, requested and was granted a six-month extension to the RideFACT project in August 2017. At the current draw-down rate, the RideFACT project would require a three-month extension beyond its amended expiration date of March 30, 2018. If any additional time to draw down on remaining funds is needed, the Transportation Committee will be asked to consider the extension request in spring 2018. An additional schedule assessment will be conducted at the end of December 2018.
• Jewish Family Services’ North County Inland project, funded by both Senior Mini-Grant and Section 5310 funds, would require a nine-month extension at its current draw-down rate. The grant is not set to expire until January 31, 2018. An additional schedule assessment will be conducted at the end of October 2017.
• The City of La Mesa project, funded by Senior Mini-Grant funds, would require a ten-month extension at its current draw-down rate. The grant is not set to expire until June 29, 2018, so any action required for an extension request would be taken at the status update presented to the Transportation Committee in spring 2018. An additional schedule assessment will be conducted at the end of March 2018.
3
The City of Vista, funded by Senior Mini-Grant funds, and St. Madeleine Sophie’s Center, funded by Section 5310 funds, are not on the “schedule watch list;” but they requested a three-month extension and six-month extension respectively, which were executed in August and September 2017.
SANDAG will continue to monitor the progress of all grantees and report on any extension requests in the next quarterly status update.
Pending Grants
Due to the operating nature of specialized transportation grants, when a new grant is awarded to continue a project that already has an existing grant, the start date of that new grant would begin upon termination of the existing grant for that same project. Staff tracks anticipated start dates for new grants, which often change as the programs experience growth. Attachment 1 also indicates which projects have pending grants and the anticipated start date of each new grant. Several grantees have pending grants that were recently awarded by the Board of Directors on March 24, 2017. Execution of the agreements for these pending grants began on July 1, 2017.
Next Steps
Staff will continue to monitor all grantee progress relative to the grant agreements, proposals, and Board Policy No. 035. The next report will be presented to the Transportation Committee in January 2018.
CHARLES “MUGGS” STOLL Director of Land Use and Transportation Planning
Attachment: 1. Status of Active and Pending Specialized Transportation Grant Projects - Reporting Period through June 30, 2017
Key Staff Contact: Jack Christensen, (619) 699-6995, [email protected]
4 Status of Active and Pending Senior Mini‐Grant Projects Attachment 1 Reporting period through June 30, 2017
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual ElderHelp — 5004701 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $22.08 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour Project Cost* $109,831.25 $116,647.50 $111,445.60 06/30/2016 – 06/29/2018 Cost Efficiency NO $18.02 $16.84 This project is progressing in a timely manner and operating at a level Trips 13,335 8,001 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO Seat Utilization of cost efficiency within the performance threshold. Cost/Trip** $16.98 $13.93 49.21% Pending Grant? NO 40.65% 35.18%
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual City of Vista — 5004705 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $15.06 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour
Project Cost* $132,713.75 $109,877.96 08/01/2016 – 10/31/2017 Cost Efficiency YES $68.94 $33.82 This project is progressing in a timely manner and operating at a level of cost efficiency that exceeds the performance threshold. A three‐ month extension was executed in August 2017. The grantee exceeded Trips 11,454 7,144 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO Seat Utilization the performance threshold in June 2017, eleven months after their start date. SANDAG is not requiring a cost recovery plan before the Cost/Trip** $11.59 $15.38 82.79% Pending Grant? NO 98.30% 51.72% grant agreement's termination date of 10/31/2017.
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual Travelers Aid Society — 5004704 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Performance Threshold**** $11.85 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour Project Cost* $248,168.75 $248,168.75 07/01/2016 – 06/30/2017 Cost Efficiency NO $29.76 $8.04 This project is complete. Travelers Aid Society's next grant, 5005197, Trips 27,232 64,936 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO Seat Utilization began on 7/1/17. Cost/Trip** $9.11 $3.82 100.00% Pending Grant? YES 55.01% 60.85%
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual City of La Mesa — 5004702 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $32.83 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour Project Cost* $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $217,041.38 06/30/2016 – 06/29/2018 Cost Efficiency NO $39.52 $7.66 This project is operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance threshold but would require a ten‐month extension to Trips 19,800 13,872 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES Seat Utilization draw down on all remaining funding. An additional schedule Cost/Trip** $25.25 $15.65 43.41% Pending Grant? YES 59.93% 43.47% assessment will be conducted at the end of FY18 Q2.
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual City of Oceanside — 5004706 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $20.23 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour Project Cost* $244,940.00 $250,000.00 $494,940.00 07/01/2015 – 06/30/2017 Cost Efficiency NO $31.68 $40.40 This project is complete. The City of Oceanside's next grant, 5005198, Trips 31,800 36,969 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO Seat Utilization began on 7/1/17. Cost/Trip** $15.56 $13.39 100.00% Pending Grant? YES 33.92% 33.31%
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual FACT Mobility Management — 5004710 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $7.76 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour Project Cost* $250,000.00 $106,438.75 $356,438.75 10/01/2015 – 09/30/2017 Cost Efficiency NO N/A N/A This project is complete. FACT's next grant, 5005195, began on Units 59,691 74,414 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO Seat Utilization 7/1/17. Cost/Unit** $5.97 $4.79 100.00% Pending Grant? YES N/A N/A
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual FACT RideFACT — 5004707 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $14.77 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour
Project Cost* $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $310,910.10 10/01/2016 – 3/30/2018 Cost Efficiency NO $137.36 $27.90 This project is operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance threshold. A six‐month extension was executed in August 2017. At the current draw‐down rate, FACT would require an Trips 44,000 36,044 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES Seat Utilization additional three‐month extension to draw down on all remaining funding. An additional schedule assessment will be conducted at the Cost/Trip** $11.36 $8.63 62.18% Pending Grant? YES 41.67% 39.28% end of FY18 Q2.
* Project cost includes the Senior Mini‐Grant amount and the required match amount ** Cost per trip based on first year figures *** Cumulative to date 5 **** 130% of proposed first year cost/trip Mountain Health and Community Services — Contract Watch List Proposed Actual Actual*** Grant Term Comments 5004708 Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $36.18 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour
Project Cost* $66,018.75 $66,902.50 $87,692.66 07/01/2015 – 12/31/2017 Cost Efficiency NO $50.41 $27.98 This project is operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance threshold. A six month extension was executed in April 2017. At the current draw‐down rate, Moutain Health and Community Trips 4,776 2,727 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES Seat Utilization Services would require an additional seven‐month extension to draw down on all remaining funding. An additional schedule assessment Cost/Trip** $27.83 $32.16 65.97% Pending Grant? NO 138.19% 43.03% will be conducted at the end of FY18 Q2.
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual Comments City of Coronado — 5004696 Actual*** Grant Term Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $8.63 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour At the current draw down rate, the City of Coronado would require a 24‐ Project Cost* $59,972.50 $50,027.50 $26,172.64 07/01/2016 – 06/30/2018 Cost Efficiency YES $33.21 $217.20 month extension. This project funds the development of a new transportation service, and the grantee started service last quarter. As is required by the grant agreement, the grantee has submitted a draft Trips 16,560 245 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES Seat Utilization recovery plan detailing how they will achieve the performance threshold within the next six months. An additional schedule assessment will be Cost/Trip** $6.64 $106.83 23.79% Pending Grant? NO 66.67% 37.40% conducted at the end of FY18 Q2.
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual Peninsula Shepherd Senior Center — 5004700 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $17.41 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour Project Cost* $48,000.00 $52,000.00 $90,102.90 02/01/2016 – 01/31/2018 Cost Efficiency NO $9.18 $11.67 This project is progressing in a timely manner and operating at a level Trips 9,334 7,950 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO Seat Utilization of cost efficiency within the performance threshold. Cost/Trip** $13.39 $11.33 90.10% Pending Grant? YES 73.80% 84.72%
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual JFS Eastern San Diego — 5004699 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $20.50 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour Project Cost* $178,648.75 $184,006.25 $238,694.15 02/01/2016 – 01/31/2018 Cost Efficiency NO $24.04 $24.13 This project is progressing in a timely manner and operating at a level Trips 23,000 15,054 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO Seat Utilization of cost efficiency within the performance threshold. Cost/Trip** $15.77 $15.86 65.82% Pending Grant? YES 38.99% 33.48%
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual JFS Northern San Diego — 5004697 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $17.95 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour Project Cost* $183,607.50 $189,116.25 $325,503.45 10/01/2015 – 09/30/2017 Cost Efficiency NO $15.83 $18.13 This project is progressing in a timely manner and operating at a level Trips 27,000 19,641 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO Seat Utilization of cost efficiency within the performance threshold. Cost/Trip** $13.80 $16.57 87.33% Pending Grant? YES 35.09% 36.30%
Contract Watch List Proposed Actual JFS North County Inland San Diego — 5004698 Actual*** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold**** $15.04 Cost/Vehicle Service Hour
Project Cost* $173,828.75 $179,043.75 $184,949.75 02/01/2016 – 01/31/2018 Cost Efficiency NO $15.11 $14.02 This project is operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance threshold but would require a nine‐month extension to Trips 30,500 13,192 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES Seat Utilization draw down on all remaining funding. An additional schedule Cost/Trip** $11.57 $14.02 52.41% Pending Grant? YES 33.01% 33.43% assessment will be conducted at the end of FY18 Q2.
* Project cost includes the Senior Mini‐Grant amount and the required match amount ** Cost per trip based on first year figures *** Cumulative to date 6 **** 130% of proposed first year cost/trip Status of Active and Pending 5310 Grant Projects Reporting period through June 30, 2017
Contract Watch List FACT RideFACT ‐ 5004689 Actual** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold*** $21.27 Project Cost* $360,000.00 $360,000.00 $449,479.64 10/01/2015 ‐ 3/30/2018 Cost Efficiency NO This project is operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance threshold, but would require an three‐ Trips 44,000 35,761 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES month extension in addition to the six‐month extension already granted. An additional schedule assessment will be Cost/Trip $16.36 $12.57 62.43% Pending Grant? NO made at the end of FY18 Q1.
Contract Watch List FACT Mobility Management ‐ 5004692 Actual** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold*** $7.76 Project Cost* $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $500,000.00 10/01/2015‐3/31/2017 Cost Efficiency NO Units 83,732 74,414 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES This project is complete. FACT's pending grant will begin on 10/1/2017. Cost/Unit $5.97 $6.72 100.00% Pending Grant? YES
Contract Watch List JFS Northern San Diego 5004684 Actual** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold*** $19.14 Project Cost* $195,844.00 $201,726.00 $347,187.83 10/01/2015 ‐ 9/30/2017 Cost Efficiency NO This project is progressing in a timely manner and operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance Trips 27,000 19,641 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO threshold. Cost/Trip $14.72 $17.68 87.33% Pending Grant? YES
Contract Watch List JFS North County Inland 5004685 Actual** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold*** $16.04 Project Cost* $185,416.00 $190,982.00 $197,323.14 2/01/2016 ‐ 1/31/2018 Cost Efficiency NO This project is operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance threshold, but would require a nine‐ Units 30,500 13,192 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES month extension to draw down on all remaining funding. An additional schedule assessment will be made at the end Cost/Unit $12.34 $14.96 52.42% Pending Grant? YES of FY18 Q1.
Contract Watch List JFS Eastern San Diego 5004686 Actual** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold*** $21.86 Project Cost* $190,558.00 $196,278.00 $254,607.12 2/01/2016 ‐ 1/31/2018 Cost Efficiency NO This project is progressing in a timely manner and operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance Trips 23,000 15,054 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO threshold. Cost/Trip $16.82 $16.91 65.82% Pending Grant? YES
Contract Watch List St. Madeleine Sophie's Center 5004694 Actual** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold*** $1.97 Project Cost* $383,854.00 $383,854.00 $581,947.22 10/01/2015 ‐ 9/30/2017 Cost Efficiency NO This project is progressing in a timely manner and operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance Trips 507,027 404,880 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule NO threshold. In September 2017, a six‐month time exension was executed to ensure the grantee can draw down on all Cost/Trip $1.51 $1.44 75.80% Pending Grant? YES remaining funding.
Contract Watch List City of La Mesa 5004693 Actual** Grant Term Comments Year 1 Year 2 Performance Threshold*** $19.70 Project Cost* $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $130,206.92 6/30/2016 ‐ 6/29/2018 Cost Efficiency NO This project is operating at a level of cost efficiency within the performance threshold, but would require a ten‐ Trips 19,800 13,868 Percent of Funding Expended Schedule YES month extension to draw down on all remaining funding. An additional schedule assessment will be made at the end Cost/Trip $15.15 $9.39 43.40% Pending Grant? YES of FY18 Q1.
* Project cost includes the New Freedom amount and the required match amount ** Cost per trip based on first year figures *** Cumulative to date **** 130% of proposed first year cost/trip
7
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17-10-4 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OCTOBER 20, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED: ADOPT
2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT File Number 1500300 PROGRAM: AMENDMENT NO. 8
Introduction Recommendation
On September 23, 2016, the Board of Directors The Transportation Committee is asked adopted the 2016 Regional Transportation to adopt Resolution No. 2018-06, in Improvement Program (RTIP), the multiyear program substantially the same form as shown in of proposed major transportation projects in the Attachment 1, approving Amendment San Diego region covering the period FY 2017 to No. 8 to the 2016 Regional FY 2021. The 2016 RTIP is a multibillion dollar Transportation Improvement Program. program of projects funded by federal, state, TransNet local sales tax, and other local funding sources. The 2017 Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, which incorporates the SANDAG 2016 RTIP, received federal approval on December 16, 2016.
Background
SANDAG processes amendments to the RTIP generally on a quarterly basis and occasionally on a more frequent basis as circumstances arise. SANDAG is processing Amendment No. 8 to the 2016 RTIP as part of its quarterly amendment cycle to include requests for changes by member agencies.
TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee
The Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee, which is an independent citizen oversight committee, reviewed the TransNet-funded projects included in Amendment No. 8 on October 11, 2017. No comments were received.
Public Notice/Resolutions
To remain consistent with SANDAG’s Public Participation Policy, SANDAG transmitted the draft Amendment No. 8 to interested parties for a 15-day public review period on September 19, 2017, closing on October 9, 2017. No comments were received.
Discussion
The following summarizes the changes proposed in this amendment, in alphabetical order, with additional details included in Table 1 (Attachment 2). Funds referred to as Local funds are those which are available to local agencies through various formula based tax revenues or local developer fees. These funds are not required to be programmed unless added to a project included in the RTIP. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
Interstate 5 – High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/Managed Lanes (CAL09) – This amendment proposes to revise TransNet – Major Corridor (MC) funding between fiscal years and increase federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding in FY 2017. The amendment also proposes to reduce the amount of CMAQ Conversion funding and federal Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Conversion funding. These budget changes were approved by the Board of Directors on September 22, 2017. The total programmed amount remains at $543,964,000 with the overall project total cost of $934,486,000.
Interstate 805 (I-805) Direct Access Ramp and HOV at Carroll Canyon (CAL09C) – This amendment proposes to revise TransNet – MC funding between fiscal years. The total programmed amount remains at $84,239,000 with the overall project total cost of $95,730,000.
Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) Mobility Program (CAL46A) – This amendment proposes to increase SHOPP – Mobility funding in FY 2019 and FY 2020 for this grouped listing as scheduled for approval by the California Transportation Committee (CTC) at its October meeting. Total programmed amount increases by $29,010,000 bringing the new total to $63,413,000.
Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation - SHOPP Roadway Preservation Program (CAL46E) – This amendment proposes to increase SHOPP – Roadway Preservation National Highway System funding in FY 2019 and FY 2020 for this grouped listing as scheduled for approval at the October CTC meeting. Total programmed amount increases by $24,367,000 bringing the new total to $185,233,000.
State Route 94/125 Southbound to Eastbound Connector (CAL68) – This amendment proposes to delay this project due to the expiration of the state Traffic Congestion Relief Program funding until additional funds can be identified for the next phase of work. Total programmed amount decreases by $52,867,000 bringing the new total to $11,095,000.
I-805 HOV/Managed Lanes - South (CAL78C) – This amendment proposes to move the scope and funding for the I-805 Soundwalls to a new project – CAL78D. The amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – MC in FY 2017 and FY 2018 and federal RSTP funding in Prior years in order to transfer these funds to CAL78D as explained below. Total programmed amount decreases by $16,329,000 bringing the new total to $224,033,000.
I-805 Ultimate Soundwalls (CAL78D) – This amendment proposes to add this new project to the 2016 RTIP with funding transferred from CAL78C and additional TransNet – MC as approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting on September 22, 2017. Total programmed amount is $38,289,000.
Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation on the State Highway System - Highway Maintenance Program (CAL194) – This amendment proposes to increase funding in FY 2018 due to the addition of a new project for Maintenance Asphalt Overlay on State Route 79 (CAL466) to the approved FY 2017/2018 project list for the Highway Maintenance Program. Total programmed amount increases by $6,994,000 bringing the new total to $8,945,000.
2 City of Chula Vista
Bikeway Design and Construction (CHV70) – This amendment proposes to add new statewide Active Tranportation Program (ATP) funding from the 2017 Active Transportation Augmentation as scheduled to be allocated by the CTC at its meeting on October 19, 2017. Total programmed amount increases by $851,000 bringing the new total to $2,217,000.
City of El Cajon
Cajon Valley Union School District Safe Routes to School Plan (EL36) – This amendment proposes to add this new project to the 2016 RTIP with the 2017 Active Transportation Augmentation funding as scheduled to be allocated by the CTC at its meeting on October 19, 2017. This new project proposes to provide education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation activities at a total of six elementary and middle schools in the City of El Cajon. Total programmed amount is $500,000.
City of La Mesa
Street Reconstruction (CR) (LAM40) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet - Local Street Improvement (LSI) funding in FY 2017 and FY 2018 to align with revised revenue estimates. Total programmed amount decreases by $65,000 bringing the new total to $5,224,000.
City of Lemon Grove
The City of Lemon Grove made the following adjustments to its programming to reflect changes included in the city’s FY 2017-2018 Annual Budget.
Lemon Grove Avenue Realignment Project (LG13) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI Carry Over funding in FY 2018 in addition to revising and increasing Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount increases by $731,000 bringing the new total to $3,965,000.
Traffic Improvements (Preventive Maintenance) (LG14) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2017 while increasing TransNet – LSI in FY 2018 through FY 2021. Total programmed amount increases by $17,000 bringing the new total to $1,219,000.
Storm Drain Rehabilitation (Preventive Maintenance) (LG15) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 through FY 2021 while increasing TransNet – LSI Carry Over in Prior years based on actual payments. Total programmed amount decreases by $66,000 bringing the new total to $734,000.
Storm Drain Rehabilitation (Congestion Relief) (LG16) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 while reducing TransNet – LSI in FY 2019 through FY 2021. Total programmed amount decreases by $72,000 bringing the new total to $1,208,000.
Street Improvements (Preventive Maintenance) (LG17) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI Carry Over in FY 2018 and FY 2019 and reduce TransNet – LSI in FY 2018 and FY 2019 while increasing TransNet – LSI in FY 2020 and FY 2021. Total programmed amount increases by $126,000 bringing the new total to $789,000.
3 Traffic Improvements (Congestion Relief) (LG18) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 and TransNet – LSI Carry Over funding in FY 2017. Total programmed amount increases by $31,000 bringing the new total to $333,000.
Street Improvements (Congestion Relief - Non Capacity Increasing) (LG20) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI in FY 2018 through FY 2020 while increasing funding in FY 2021 and revise and reduce TransNet – LSI Carry Over funding from FY 2017 to FY 2018. This amendment also proposes to add Local funds as the city is including this project on its list of proposed projects for formula funds under the Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) Local Streets and Roads program. Total programmed amount decreases by $398,000 bringing the new total to $3,795,000.
City of National City
Plaza Boulevard Widening (NC01) – This amendment proposes to increase and revise TransNet – LSI Funding between FY 2018 to FY 2021. Total programmed amount increases by $100,000 bringing the new total to $6,623,000.
Street Resurfacing Project (NC03) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 while reducing funding in FY 2019 through FY 2021 to balance to revised revenue estimates. Total programmed amount decreases by $1,400,000 bringing the new total to $20,780,000.
Traffic Signal Install/Upgrade (NC04) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI funding in all years of the RTIP. Total programmed amount increases by $295,000 bringing the new total to $834,000.
Citywide Safe Routes to Schools (NC15) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI funding in all years of the RTIP. Total programmed amount increases by $856,000 bringing the new total to $4,020,000.
North County Transit District
Preventive Maintenance (NCTD02) – This amendment proposes to transfer Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 and Transit Development Act (TDA) funding to NCTD06 in FY 2017, as shown below. Total programmed amount decreases by $327,000 bringing the new total to $113,751,000.
Bus/Rail Support Equipment & Facilities (NCTD06) – This amendment proposes to receive FTA 5307 and TDA funding from NCTD02 in FY 2017. Total programmed amount increases by $327,000 bringing the new total to $37,674,000.
City of Oceanside
Neighborhood Sidewalk/ADA/Traffic Improvements (O18) – This amendment proposes to add Local funds as the city is including this project on its list of proposed projects for formula funds under the SB 1 Local Streets and Roads program. Total programmed amount increases by $1,000,000 bringing the new total to $17,679,000.
4 City of Poway
The City of Poway made the following adjustments to its programming to align with revised revenue estimates.
16/17 Annual Reconstruction and Overlay Project (POW20) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2017. Total programmed amount decreases by $25,000 bringing the new total to $1,065,000.
Street Maintenance Project Zones 7 (16/17) and Zone 8 (17/18) (POW28) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount decreases by $25,000 bringing the new total to $893,000.
Street Maintenance Project Zone 1 (18/19), and Zone 2 (19/20) (POW30) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2019 and FY 2020. Total programmed amount decreases by $66,000 bringing the new total to $922,000.
17/18 Annual Street Reconstruction and Overlay Project (POW31) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 and revise the project scope to identify planned streets. Total programmed amount decreases by $39,000 bringing the new total to $847,000.
18/19 Annual Street Reconstruction and Overlay Project (POW32) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2019. Total programmed amount decreases by $16,000 bringing the new total to $220,000.
Poway Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Project (POW33) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2019. Total programmed amount decreases by $30,000 bringing the new total to $870,000.
20/21 Annual Reconstruction and Overlay Project (POW38) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2021. Total programmed amount decreases by $325,000 bringing the new total to $500,000.
Street Maintenance Project Zone 3 (20/21) (POW39) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2021. Total programmed amount decreases by $39,000 bringing the new total to $489,000.
19/20 Annual Street Reconstruction and Overlay Project (POW40) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2020. Total programmed amount decreases by $27,000 bringing the new total to $250,000.
San Diego Association of Governments
Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, Track, and Trackbed in Existing Rights-of-Way: Blue Line Corridor (SAN66) – This amendment proposes to revise funding between fiscal years due to the transfer of TransNet – MC funding from Blue Line Communications Upgrades (SAN174) to Blue Line Crossovers and Signals (SAN171), two projects included in this grouped listing. Total programmed amount remains at $278,365,000.
5 Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, Track, and Trackbed in Exisiting Rights-of-Way: Coastal Rail Corridor (SAN114) – This amendment proposes to revise funding between FY 2017 through FY 2019 to transfer TransNet – MC funding from Carlsbad Village Double Track (SAN130) to Oceanside Station Pass Through Track (SAN116), two projects included in this grouped listing. Total programmed amount remains at $217,916,000.
Elvira to Morena Double Track (SAN132) – This amendment proposes to revise funding between fiscal years for TransNet – MC and TransNet – MC AC funding, federal RSTP funds, state Cap-and-Trade funds, and Local funds. Total programmed amount remains at $192,521,000.
Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities – Uptown Bikeways (SAN228) – This amendment proposes to reduce TDA – Bicycles funding in FY 2017 while increasing funding in FY 2018 and revise TransNet – Smart Growth Incentive Program (SGIP) funding in FY 2018 and FY 2019 in order to prioritze the use of TDA funding. The amendment also revises TransNet Bicycle Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety Program (BPNS) funding between fiscal years to reflect an approved FY 2018 budget adjustment to the Uptown Bikeways: Fourth and Fifth Avenue Bikeways Project (SAN160). Total programmed amount remains at $29,500,000.
City of San Diego
The City of San Diego adjusted its programming to reflect the passage of the city’s budget on August 4, 2017.
Sidewalks – Citywide (SD09) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount decreases by $150,000 bringing the new total to $16,856,000.
Traffic Signals – Citywide (SD16A) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 while increasing funding in FY 2019. Total programmed amount decreases by $150,000 bringing the new total to $29,554,000.
Traffic Control Measures (SD18) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount decreases by $615,000 bringing the new total to $9,745,000.
Streamview Drive (SD19) – This amendment proposes to revise project limits and transfer scope to new project SD249 for the second phase of this project. Total programmed amount remains at $4,452,000.
Median Improvements Citywide (SD49) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount increases by $50,000 bringing the new total to $5,445,000.
State Route 163/Friars Road Interchange Modification (SD83) – This amendment proposes to replace Earmark Repurposing funding with Local funds in FY 2017 and increase TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2019 due to higher than expected construction bids. Total programmed amount increases by $2,908,000 bringing the new total to $61,393,000.
Street Resurfacing Citywide (SD96) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 through FY 2021. Total programmed amount decreases by $6,671,000 bringing the new total to $71,306,000.
6 Bridge Rehabilitation (SD99) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount decreases by $450,000 bringing the new total to $4,484,000.
Bayshore Bikeway (SD108) – This amendment proposes to replace TransNet – LSI with Local funds in FY 2018. Total programmed amount remains at $5,591,000.
University Avenue Mobility Project Phase 1 (SD129) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount increases by $750,000 bringing the new total to $5,906,000.
Minor Bicycle Facilities (SD166) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI Carry Over funding in Prior years to reconcile to FY 2017 payments and reduce TranNet – LSI funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount decreases by $370,000 bringing the new total to $5,546,000.
Maintenance and Non Congestion Relief Efforts (SD176) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 through FY 2021. Total programmed amount decreases by $1,522,000 bringing the new total to $121,247,000.
Administrative Expenses (SD186) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018 through FY 2021 and increase TransNet – LSI Carry Over funding in FY 2019 and FY 2020. Total programmed amount decreases by $51,000 bringing the new total to $3,673,000.
Palm Avenue/Interstate 805 Interchange (SD190) – This amendment proposes to increase Local funding in FY 2020 and revise Open to Traffic Dates for Phase 2 from December 2018 to June 2020. Total programmed amount increases by $10,500,000 bringing the new total to $27,869,000.
Avenida De La Playa Infrastructure Project (SD248) – This amendment proposes to increase TransNet – LSI funding in FY 2018. Total programmed amount increases by $1,000,000 bringing the new total to $6,000,000.
Steamview Drive Improvements Phase 2 (SD249) – This amendment proposes to add this new project to the 2016 RTIP for preliminary engineering for Streamview Drive Improvements including a raised median, new sidewalk including curbs and gutters and traffic circles on Streamview Drive from 54th and Lynn/Michael Street and between Gayle Street and College Avenue. Total programmed amount is $150,000.
Transportation Corridor Agencies
Foothill Transportation Corridor South (TCA01) – This amendment proposes to revise the budget and schedule to reflect a November 2016 Settlement Agreement with the Transportation Corridor Agencies to evaluate new route alternatives for the extension of State Route 241 from Interstate 5 to the Orange/San Diego County line, which will result in the selection of a locally preferred alignment in 2021. Future Right of Way and Construction funds have been removed until a new estimate can be established. The proposed project is for Preliminary Engineering expenses to obtain Environmental Clearance. Total programmed amount decreases by $214,033,000 bringing the programmed total to $178,390,000 with a total overall project cost for Preliminay Engineering of $298,106,000.
7 Various Agencies
Grouped Projects for TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program (V10) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – SGIP funding by showing Main Street Promenade Extension Planning Project (LG21) and East Village Green/14th Street Promenade Master Plan (SD231) projects as complete and removing them from the grouped listing. Total programmed amount decreases by $700,000 bringing the new total to $29,766,000.
Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (V12) – This amendment proposes to reduce TransNet – BPNS funds and Local funds by showing the following projects as complete and removing them from the grouped listing: Bikeway Village Bayshore Bikeway Access Enhancement Project (IB16); Bicycle Parking Enhancements (NC18); Downtown Complete Streets Mobility Plan (SD224) and Linda Vista CATS (SD 225). Total programmed amount decreases by $2,760,000 bringing the new total to $30,089,000.
Grouped Projects for TransNet Active Transportation Grant Program (ATGP) (V17) – This amendment proposes to reduce TDA funding and Local funding by showing the following Active Transportation Grant projects as complete and removing them from the grouped listing: Walk + Bike Chula Vista Education Encouragement Awareness Campaign (CHV81); Be Safe El Cajon (EL34); National City Bicycle Parking Enhancements (NC27); and Bike/Bus Safety Public Outreach Project (O43). Total programmed amount decreases by $335,000 bringing the new total to $6,148,000.
Fiscal Constraint Analysis
Federal regulations require the 2016 RTIP to be a revenue-constrained document with programmed projects based upon available or committed funding and/or reasonable estimates of future funding. Funding assumptions generally are based upon: (1) authorized or appropriated levels of federal and state funding from current legislation; (2) conservative projections of future federal and state funding based upon a continuation of current funding levels; (3) the most current Board approved (February 2017) short-term revenue forecasts for the TransNet Program; and (4) the planning and programming documents of the local transportation providers.
Tables 2a through 2c (Attachment 3) provide updated program summaries, including a comparison from the prior approved version. (Chapter 4 of the Final 2016 RTIP discusses, in detail, the financial capacity analysis of major program areas including a discussion of available revenues.) Highlighting in the attachment indicates a change from the previous report. Based upon the analysis, the projects contained within the 2016 RTIP, including Amendment No. 8, are reasonable when considering available funding sources.
Air Quality Analysis
On September 23, 2016, SANDAG found the 2016 RTIP in conformance with the Regional Air Quality Strategy/State Implementation Plan (SIP) and with the 2009 Regional Air Quality Strategy for the San Diego region. All the required regionally significant capacity increasing projects were included in the quantitative emissions analysis conducted for the San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan) and the 2016 RTIP. The Federal Highway Administration and the FTA jointly approved the conformity determination for the 2016 RTIP and the conformity redetermination for the Regional Plan on December 16, 2016.
8 The proposed amendment does not reflect a change in the design, concept, or scope of the project or the conformity analysis years as modeled for the regional emissions analysis of the 2016 RTIP. Projects in the 2016 RTIP Amendment No. 8 meet the conformity provisions of the Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR §93.122(g)). All capacity increasing projects in Amendment No. 8 were included in the quantitative emissions analysis conducted for the Regional Plan and 2016 RTIP. All other projects not included in the air quality conformity analysis are either non-capacity increasing or are exempt from the requirement to determine conformity in accordance with the Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR §93.126). SANDAG followed interagency consultation procedures to determine which projects are exempt. Amendment No. 8 does not interfere with the timely implementation of Transportation Control Measures. The 2016 RTIP, including Amendment No. 8, remains in conformance with the SIP.
JOSÉ A. NUNCIO TransNet Department Director
Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 2018-06: Approving Amendment No. 8 to the 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program 2. Table 1: 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program - Amendment No. 8 3. Tables 2a-2c: Fiscal Constraint Analysis
Key Staff Contact: Sue Alpert, (619) 595-5318, [email protected]
9 Attachment 1
401 B Street, Suite 800 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-06 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone (619) 699-1900 Fax (619) 699-1905 sandag.org
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO.8 TO THE 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2016, SANDAG adopted the 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and found the 2016 RTIP in conformance with the applicable State Implementation Plans (SIPs), and with the 2009 Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS), in accordance with California law; and
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2016, the U.S. Department of Transportation determined the 2016 RTIP and the San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan) in conformance to the applicable SIPs in accordance with the provisions of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 51 and 93; and
WHEREAS, member agencies have requested various changes to existing projects for inclusion into the 2016 RTIP as shown in Table 1; and
WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the metropolitan transportation planning regulations per 23 CFR Part 450; and
WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the Regional Plan, which conforms to the to all applicable SIPs and to the emissions budgets from the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the 1997 National Ozone Standard for San Diego County, which were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2013, and from the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County, which were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2008, and from the 2004 Revision to California SIP for Carbon Monoxide, for Ten Federal Planning Areas which was approved as a SIP revision in 2006; and
WHEREAS, the regionally significant, capacity increasing projects have been incorporated into the quantitative air quality emissions analysis and conformity findings conducted for the Regional Plan and the 2016 RTIP; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 8 to the 2016 RTIP continues to provide for timely implementation of transportation control measures contained in the adopted RAQS/SIP for air quality and a quantitative emissions analysis demonstrates that the implementation of the RTIP projects and programs meet all the federally required emissions budget targets; and
10 WHEREAS, projects in Amendment No. 8 satisfy the transportation conformity provisions of 40 CFR 93.122(g) and all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450; and
WHEREAS, all other projects in Amendment No. 8 are either non-capacity increasing or exempt from the requirements to determine conformity; and
WHEREAS, the projects in 2016 RTIP Amendment No. 8 are fiscally constrained; and
WHEREAS, the projects in 2016 RTIP Amendment No. 8 are consistent with the Public Participation Policy adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, that the SANDAG Board of Directors has delegated the approval of RTIP amendments to the Transportation Committee; NOW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED that the SANDAG Transportation Committee, does hereby approve Amendment No. 8 to the 2016 RTIP; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that SANDAG finds the 2016 RTIP, including Amendment No. 8, is consistent with the Regional Plan, is in conformance with the applicable SIPs, and with the 2016 RAQS for the San Diego region, is consistent with SANDAG Intergovernmental Review Procedures, and is consistent with SANDAG Public Participation Policy, as amended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 2017.
ATTEST: CHAIRPERSON SECRETARY
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego. ADVISORY MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Transit System, North County Transit District, Imperial County, U.S. Department of Defense, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority, Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association, and Mexico.
11 Attachment 2 Table 1 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Caltrans MPO ID: CAL09 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Interstate 5 - HOV/Managed Lanes EA NO: 235800 PPNO: 0615, 0615CDE Project Description: From La Jolla Village Dr. to Harbor Dr. - construct High Occupancy RTP PG NO: A-16, B-30 Vehicle (HOV)/Managed Lanes on I-5; construct Phase 1: Construct SANDAG ID: 1200501, HOV from Lomas Santa Fe to Birmingham and replace San Elijo Bridge; 1200504, 1200509, 1200510, Construct Phase 2: construct HOV lanes from Birmingham to SR78; 1200511 Construct Phase 3: Soundwalls on private property from Manchester to FHWA TRANSFER NO: SR-78. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the ROW 16-070 phase, Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the CON phase Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:5 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $934,486 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Sep 2020 Phase 2: Sep 2021 Phase 3: Sep 2021 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $157,841 $120,585 $20,359 $6,969 $5,616 $3,231 $1,081 $115,673 $35,653 $6,515 TransNet - MC AC $0 $129,803 $(20,715) $(68,150) $(27,042) $(13,896) CBI $416 $416 $416 CMAQ $73,287 $32,315 $40,972 $23,515 $8,800 $40,972 CMAQ - Conversion $73,488 $6,003 $26,547 $27,042 $13,896 $73,488 Earmark Repurposing $1,220 $1,220 $1,220 IM $3,886 $3,886 $3,886 RSTP $63,189 $32,557 $30,631 $40,991 $6,106 $16,092 RSTP - Conversion $56,315 $14,712 $41,603 $56,315 STP $751 $751 $751 STIP-RIP AC $112,943 $68,943 $44,000 $9,561 $103,382 STIP-RIP State Cash $628 $628 $628 TOTAL $543,964 $389,884 $93,182 $6,969 $5,616 $3,231 $45,081 $196,641 $50,559 $296,764 * $5.324M programmed in CAL46A; $299K provided outside of the RTIP; Demo IDs CA653, CA676 repurposed to FHWA transfer number CAT 16-070; Additional project costs of $390,522 not yet funded. PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-07 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $157,841 $120,585 $26,403 $4,870 $2,545 $2,267 $1,171 $114,152 $22,297 $21,391 TransNet - MC AC $0 $144,803 $(27,525) $(63,150) $(54,128) CBI $416 $416 $416 CMAQ $58,287 $32,315 $25,972 $23,515 $8,800 $25,972 CMAQ - Conversion $74,592 $21,003 $26,547 $27,042 $74,592 Earmark Repurposing $1,220 $1,220 $1,220 IM $3,886 $3,886 $3,886 RSTP $63,189 $32,557 $30,631 $40,991 $6,106 $16,092 RSTP - Conversion $70,211 $6,522 $36,603 $27,086 $70,211 STP $751 $751 $751 STIP-RIP AC $112,943 $68,943 $44,000 $9,561 $103,382 STIP-RIP State Cash $628 $628 $628 TOTAL $543,964 $404,884 $84,226 $4,870 $2,545 $2,267 $45,171 $195,120 $37,203 $311,640
Page 1 Thursday, September 28, 2017
12 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Caltrans MPO ID: CAL09C RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: I-805 Direct Access Ramp and HOV at Carroll Canyon EA NO: 2T040, 2T041 PPNO: 0716 Project Description: From Carroll Canyon Road to I- 5 - construct Direct Access Ramps RTP PG NO: (DARs) and HOV lanes to Carroll Canyon Road on I-805 A-16,27,B-30,31,34 SANDAG ID: 1280505
Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years RT:805 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $95,730 Open to Traffic: Apr 2014
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $32,422 $30,510 $617 $809 $244 $79 $164 $16,593 $2,753 $13,076 Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $51,817 $51,817 $51,817 TOTAL $84,239 $82,327 $617 $809 $244 $79 $164 $16,593 $2,753 $64,893 * Additional local contribution of $11.491M programmed in SD32 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $32,422 $30,510 $633 $698 $263 $93 $226 $16,593 $2,753 $13,076 Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $51,817 $51,817 $51,817 TOTAL $84,239 $82,327 $633 $698 $263 $93 $226 $16,593 $2,753 $64,893
MPO ID: CAL46A RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Mobility Program Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories -railroad/highway crossing, safer non-federal-aid system roads, shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects, intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, pavement marking demonstration, truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, lighting improvements, emergency truck pullovers Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Shoulder Improvements Est Total Cost: $63,413
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $63,413 $16,433 $46,980 $63,413 TOTAL $63,413 $16,433 $46,980 $63,413 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $34,403 $11,661 $22,742 $34,403 TOTAL $34,403 $11,661 $22,742 $34,403
Page 2 Thursday, September 28, 2017
13 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Caltrans MPO ID: CAL46E RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation - SHOPP Roadway Preservation Program
Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories – pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation, emergency relief (23 USC 125), widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes) Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $185,233
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Rdway Presrv NHS $185,233 $50,878 $41,118 $16,237 $77,000 $185,233 TOTAL $185,233 $50,878 $41,118 $16,237 $77,000 $185,233 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-07 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC)-Rdway Presrv NHS $160,866 $50,878 $41,118 $5,821 $63,049 $160,866 TOTAL $160,866 $50,878 $41,118 $5,821 $63,049 $160,866 DELAYED MPO ID: CAL68 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: SR 94/125 Southbound to Eastbound Connector EA NO: 14665 PPNO: 0356 Project Description: From SR 94 to SR125 - near La Mesa and Lemon Grove on SR 125 from RTP PG NO: A-6 Mariposa St to SR 94 and on SR 94 from SR 125 to Bancroft Dr. - SANDAG ID: 1212501 Construct freeway connector, replace and widen bridges
Change Reason: Delay project RT:94 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $11,095 Open to Traffic: Jan 2020
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $3,101 $3,101 $3,101 State Cash $1,642 $1,642 $1,642 TCRP $6,352 $6,352 $5,000 $1,352 TOTAL $11,095 $11,095 $8,101 $2,994 * CIP only includes a portion of TCRP funding PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $3,101 $3,101 $3,101 State Cash $1,642 $1,642 $1,642 TCRP $59,219 $6,196 $53,023 $7,593 $3,468 $48,158 TOTAL $63,962 $10,939 $53,023 $10,694 $5,110 $48,158
Page 3 Thursday, September 28, 2017
14 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Caltrans MPO ID: CAL78C RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: I-805 HOV/Managed Lanes - South EA NO: 08161 PPNO: 0730A-B Project Description: From Palomar Street to Landis Street - environmental document for I-805 RTP PG NO: A-16,B-30,B-31 widening in San Diego, Chula Vista, and National City from Palomar SANDAG ID: 1280501, Street to State Route 94; design and construct 2 High Occupancy 1280514, 1280510 Vehicle (HOV) lanes in the median of I-805 including a Direct Access Ramp (DAR) at Palomar Street; design and construct one auxiliary lane on northbound I-805 from Grove Street to 16th Street in National City; design and construct one auxiliary lane on southbound I-805 from 20th Street to Plaza Boulevard in National City; design one HOV lane in each direction from Hilltop Drive to Landis Street and a direct HOV connector from I-805 to I-15 Change Reason: Reduce funding, Split project RT:805 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $224,033 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Feb 2016 Phase 2: Jun 2016
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $156,244 $133,489 $13,562 $4,778 $4,313 $76 $26 $57,454 $8,050 $90,740 TransNet - Transit $42 $42 $42 IM $975 $975 $975 RSTP $9,661 $9,661 $9,661 Prop 1B - CMIA $56,763 $56,763 $56,763 Local Funds $348 $180 $168 $180 $168 TOTAL $224,033 $201,110 $13,730 $4,778 $4,313 $76 $26 $68,312 $8,050 $147,671 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $157,560 $133,489 $14,434 $5,222 $4,313 $76 $26 $57,907 $8,259 $91,394 TransNet - Transit $42 $42 $42 IM $975 $975 $975 RSTP $24,674 $24,674 $22,272 $2,402 Prop 1B - CMIA $56,763 $56,763 $56,763 Local Funds $348 $180 $168 $180 $168 TOTAL $240,362 $216,123 $14,602 $5,222 $4,313 $76 $26 $81,376 $10,661 $148,325
MPO ID: CAL78D RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: I-805 Ultimate Soundwalls EA NO: 2T260, 43018 SANDAG ID: 1280515 Project Description: From Naples Street to 805/54 Separation - Construct Soundwalls. . Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the PE phase, Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the ROW phase, Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the CON phase Change Reason: New project RT:805 Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Noise attenuation Est Total Cost: $38,289
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $6,987 $909 $2,505 $2,232 $795 $546 $3,430 $249 $3,308 TransNet - MC AC $0 $6,429 $9,860 $(16,289) RSTP $15,013 $15,013 $12,611 $2,402 RSTP - AC Conversion $16,289 $16,289 $16,289 TOTAL $38,289 $15,922 $8,934 $12,092 $795 $546 $16,041 $2,651 $19,597
Page 4 Thursday, September 28, 2017
15 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Caltrans MPO ID: CAL194 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation on the State Highway System - Highway Maintenance Program
Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories -pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation - Project listing for Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation on the State Highway System - Highway Maintenance Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $8,945
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON Highway Maintenance - NHS $1,951 $1,951 $1,951 Highway Maintenance - STP $6,994 $6,994 $6,994 TOTAL $8,945 $1,951 $6,994 $8,945 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON Highway Maintenance - NHS $1,951 $1,951 $1,951 TOTAL $1,951 $1,951 $1,951
Page 5 Thursday, September 28, 2017
16 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV70 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Bikeway Design and Construction TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: East Orange AV from Melrose AV to Loma Lane; Broadway from C Street to Main Street - construction of bicycle lanes on East Orange Avenue from Melrose Ave to Loma Lane - local match for BTA award. Construction of Bike Lanes on Broadway from C Street to Main Street. Phase I from C to G Street is funded entirely by TransNet. ATP Grant will apply to Phase II (FY17/18) from G Street to Main Street Change Reason: Add new funding source, Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $2,217
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,246 $61 $250 $460 $475 $311 $935 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $120 $50 $70 $94 $26 ATP - S $851 $104 $747 $104 $747 TOTAL $2,217 $111 $320 $564 $1,222 $509 $1,708 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,246 $61 $250 $460 $475 $311 $935 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $120 $50 $70 $94 $26 TOTAL $1,366 $111 $320 $460 $475 $405 $961
Page 6 Thursday, September 28, 2017
17 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
El Cajon, City of MPO ID: EL36 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Cajon Valley Union School District Safe Routes to School Plan Project Description: Various streets in the City from Magnolia Ave to Chase Ave - The scope of this "non-infrastructure" project entails educational, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation activities at a total of six elementary and middle schools in the City of El Cajon Change Reason: New project Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Non construction related activities Est Total Cost: $500
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON ATP - S $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $500 $500 $500
Page 7 Thursday, September 28, 2017
18 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM40 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Street Reconstruction (CR) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: La Mesa Blvd. from 4th to Randlett; La Mesa Blvd. from University Ave. to El Cajon Blvd.; Echo Dr. from Palm Ave. to Panorama Dr.; Panorama Dr. from Bowling Green to Mariposa; Alvarado Rd. from Guava Ave. to trolley tracks; Lemon Ave near Helix Hills Ter. - rehabilitate pavement of identified streets that are in poor condition and in need of major reconstruction, including removal of existing pavement, and construction of a new structural pavement surface greater than 1” in depth, to provide a smooth travel surface Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $5,224
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $301 $301 $301 TransNet - L (Cash) $136 $136 $136 TransNet - LSI $2,900 $313 $787 $600 $600 $600 $2,900 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,887 $1,537 $350 $1,887 TOTAL $5,224 $1,974 $663 $787 $600 $600 $600 $5,224 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $301 $301 $301 TransNet - L (Cash) $136 $136 $136 TransNet - LSI $2,965 $325 $840 $600 $600 $600 $2,965 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,887 $1,537 $350 $1,887 TOTAL $5,289 $1,974 $675 $840 $600 $600 $600 $5,289
Page 8 Thursday, September 28, 2017
19 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Lemon Grove, City of MPO ID: LG13 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Lemon Grove Avenue Realignment Project RTP PG NO: B-38 RAS (M-41) Project Description: Lemon Grove Avenue at SR-94 - a key project in the redevelopment of TransNet - LSI: CR the city's Downtown Village Specific Plan, this project will realign Lemon Grove Avenue at SR-94 adding traffic lanes and improving access to and from SR-94, reducing motorist delays and emissions Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $3,965 Open to Traffic: Oct 2017
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $1,413 $1,413 $1,413 TransNet - LSI $64 $64 $6 $58 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,963 $563 $1,000 $400 $1,963 Local RTCIP $525 $8 $517 $525 TOTAL $3,965 $2,048 $1,000 $917 $6 $3,959 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $1,413 $1,413 $1,413 TransNet - LSI $64 $64 $6 $58 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,563 $563 $1,000 $1,563 Local RTCIP $194 $8 $186 $194 TOTAL $3,234 $2,048 $1,186 $6 $3,228
MPO ID: LG14 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Traffic Improvements (Preventive Maintenance) TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Citywide - traffic related projects scheduled throughout each fiscal year: traffic loop replacements, traffic signal upgrades, speed survey, street striping improvements, traffic calming studies, and the repair or replacement of street signs; these projects are part of the annual maintenance program established within the City to maintain the operational readiness of the street system Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operating Est Total Cost: $1,219
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $795 $178 $109 $127 $127 $127 $127 $795 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $424 $399 $25 $1 $423 TOTAL $1,219 $577 $134 $127 $127 $127 $127 $1 $1,218 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $778 $178 $120 $120 $120 $120 $120 $778 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $424 $399 $25 $1 $423 TOTAL $1,202 $577 $145 $120 $120 $120 $120 $1 $1,201
Page 9 Thursday, September 28, 2017
20 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Lemon Grove, City of MPO ID: LG15 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Storm Drain Rehabilitation (Preventive Maintenance) TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Citywide - improvements or repairs to multiple storm drain facilities such as spot repairs to existing pipes, berms or other diversion devices; attention will be given to the continuous maintenance of Chollas Creek in accordance with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit which involve debris removal, vegetation control, and/or habitat restoration; city staff/consultant to inventory storm drain system and input into GIS; condition assessment, repair options and strategy report to follow Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc Est Total Cost: $734
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $476 $103 $88 $51 $78 $78 $78 $476 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $258 $257 $27 $231 TOTAL $734 $360 $88 $51 $78 $78 $78 $27 $707 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $590 $150 $88 $88 $88 $88 $88 $590 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $210 $210 $27 $183 TOTAL $800 $360 $88 $88 $88 $88 $88 $27 $773
MPO ID: LG16 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Storm Drain Rehabilitation (Congestion Relief) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citywide - evaluate, prioritize, and implement improvements to the city's storm drain system by identifying deteriorated or problematic portions of the storm drain system, perform risk assessments to prioritize need, and perform the necessary construction repairs or replacements to avoid roadway flooding Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Hazard elimination program Est Total Cost: $1,208
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $868 $450 $39 $76 $90 $106 $106 $868 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $142 $142 $142 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $198 $138 $60 $198 TOTAL $1,208 $730 $99 $76 $90 $106 $106 $1,208 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $940 $450 $39 $67 $96 $127 $158 $940 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $142 $142 $142 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $198 $138 $60 $198 TOTAL $1,280 $730 $99 $67 $96 $127 $158 $1,280
Page 10 Thursday, September 28, 2017
21 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Lemon Grove, City of MPO ID: LG17 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Street Improvements (Preventive Maintenance) TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Citywide - maintain city streets and fund costs to survey all streets as part of the pavement management system Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $789
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $618 $362 $50 $43 $43 $55 $65 $15 $603 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $171 $41 $10 $110 $10 $171 TOTAL $789 $403 $60 $153 $53 $55 $65 $15 $774 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $612 $362 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $15 $597 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $51 $41 $10 $51 TOTAL $663 $403 $60 $50 $50 $50 $50 $15 $648
MPO ID: LG18 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Traffic Improvements (Congestion Relief) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citywide - median installation for safety improvement or left turn movement, new traffic signals, passive permissive left turn installation, signal removal for congestion relief reasons, traffic signal upgrades, intersection lighting, traffic signal coordination, and traffic signal interconnection/optimization Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Intersection signalization projects Est Total Cost: $333
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $293 $152 $20 $61 $20 $20 $20 $4 $289 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $40 $40 $40 TOTAL $333 $152 $60 $61 $20 $20 $20 $4 $329 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $252 $152 $20 $20 $20 $20 $20 $4 $248 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $50 $50 $50 TOTAL $302 $152 $70 $20 $20 $20 $20 $4 $298
Page 11 Thursday, September 28, 2017
22 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Lemon Grove, City of MPO ID: LG20 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Street Improvements (Congestion Relief - Non CI) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citywide - this project involves roadway rehabilitation (grinding and overlay, new structural pavement, or new overlay 1-inch thick or greater) of several streets within the city. Streets were prioritized for work based on levels of deterioration identified in the Pavement Management System; Sidewalk Rehabilitation: this annual project adds sidewalks, widens sidewalks, removes and/or replaces various sidewalk locations and installs Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps throughout the city; Safe Routes to School match: these projects will improve the City's sidewalk system, eliminate several potential pedestrian hazards, install in-pavement lighted markings, and create a safety zone for school children and family members to walk and bike to and from school; Street Improvements: this as needed project would widen or install curb/gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps Change Reason: Add new funding source, Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $3,795
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $2,161 $228 $397 $358 $387 $387 $406 $2,161 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $147 $147 $147 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,334 $1,147 $187 $61 $1,273 Local Funds $153 $153 $153 TOTAL $3,795 $1,522 $397 $698 $387 $387 $406 $61 $3,734 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $2,211 $228 $397 $397 $397 $397 $397 $2,211 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $147 $147 $147 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,835 $1,147 $688 $61 $1,774 TOTAL $4,193 $1,522 $1,085 $397 $397 $397 $397 $61 $4,132
Page 12 Thursday, September 28, 2017
23 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
National City, City of MPO ID: NC01 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Plaza Blvd Widening RTP PG NO: A-27, B-38 RAS (M-41) Project Description: Plaza Blvd. from Highland Ave. to Euclid Ave. - Widen from 2 to 3 lanes TransNet - LSI: CR including a new traffic lane in each direction, new sidewalks, sidewalk widening, traffic signal upgrades and interconnection at Plaza Blvd. Phase 1 - N Ave to I-805; Phase 2 - Highland Ave to N; Phase 3 - I-805 to Euclid Ave Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $6,623 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Jul 2017 Phase 2: Jul 2020 Phase 3: Jul 2023
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $797 $797 $797 TransNet - LSI $2,093 $1,351 $142 $200 $400 $896 $597 $600 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $708 $308 $400 $8 $300 $400 RSTP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Local RTCIP $1,025 $1,025 $1,025 TOTAL $6,623 $4,456 $1,567 $200 $400 $3,701 $897 $2,025 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $797 $797 $797 TransNet - LSI $1,993 $1,351 $142 $500 $896 $597 $500 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $708 $308 $400 $8 $300 $400 RSTP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Local RTCIP $1,025 $1,025 $1,025 TOTAL $6,523 $4,456 $1,567 $500 $3,701 $897 $1,925
Page 13 Thursday, September 28, 2017
24 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
National City, City of MPO ID: NC03 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Street Resurfacing Project TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Harding Avenue (north-end to W. 30th St.), Van Ness Avenue(Leonard St. to 200'south), E. 31st St. (B Ave. to D Ave., Roosevelt Avenue (north-end to W. 18th St.), Thelma Way (4th St. to E. 5th St.), E Avenue (E. 20th St. to Cul-de-sac), B Avenue (E. 7th St. to E. 8th St.), E. 5th Street (D Ave. to Highland Ave.), E. 17th St. (N Ave. to Palm Ave.), F Avenue (E. 4th St. to E. 8th St.), Lanoitan Avenue (Division St. to Melrose St.), Burden Dr. (E. 7th St. to E. 8th St.), E. 1st St. (Euclid Ave. to Clairmont Ave.), E. 24th St. (N.C. Blvd. to D Ave.), E. 2nd St. (Valva Ave. to Clairmont Ave.) W. 19th St. (Wilson Ave. to Harding Ave.), E. 3rd St. (Valva Ave. to Clairmont Ave.), W. 16th Street (Hoover Ave. to N.C. Blvd.), Prospect Avenue (E. 20th St. to E. 22nd St.), E. 28th St. (J Ave. to K Ave.), U Avenue (E. 1st St. to E. 4th St.), Paradise Dr. (PCC Fork in Road to E. 10th St.) E. 5th St. (N.C. Blvd. to D Ave.), E. 5th St. (Q Ave. to R Ave.), N Avenue (E. 16th St. to E. 18th St.), E. 15th St. (Highland Ave. to K Ave.), G Ave.(E. 21st St. to E. 22nd St.), E. 7th St. (Palm Ave. to Q Ave.), F Ave. (E. 26th St. to E. 28th St.), E. 18th St. (Highland Ave. to Palm Ave.), Valva Ave. (Melrose S..... Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $20,780
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $4,500 $4,500 $4,500 TransNet - L $5,313 $5,313 $5,313 TransNet - L (Cash) $629 $629 $629 TransNet - LSI $3,822 $2,122 $400 $400 $400 $500 $3,822 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $2,402 $2,402 $2,402 Local Funds $4,114 $4,114 $4,114 TOTAL $20,780 $19,080 $400 $400 $400 $500 $20,780 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $4,500 $4,500 $4,500 TransNet - L $5,313 $5,313 $5,313 TransNet - L (Cash) $629 $629 $629 TransNet - LSI $5,222 $2,122 $300 $900 $800 $1,100 $5,222 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $2,402 $2,402 $2,402 Local Funds $4,114 $4,114 $4,114 TOTAL $22,180 $19,080 $300 $900 $800 $1,100 $22,180
Page 14 Thursday, September 28, 2017
25 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
National City, City of MPO ID: NC04 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Traffic Signal Install/Upgrade TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: National City Boulevard (1st Street to 35th Street), Plaza Boulevard (Roosevelt Avenue to Paradise Valley Road), Euclid Avenue (Division Street to Sweetwater Road), 30th Street (National City Boulevard to Euclid Avenue), Harbor Drive (Civic Center Drive to 8th Street), Highland Avenue (Division Street to 30th Street), 8th Street (Harbor Drive to Paradise Valley Road), Division Street (Highland Avenue to Harbison Avenue), DD Avenue (8th Street to 30th Street), Palm Avenue (Division Street to 18th Street), 18th Street (National City Boulevard to Euclid Avenue), 24th Street (Tidelands Avenue to Highland Avenue), Sweetwater Road (Euclid Avenue to Plaza Bonita Center Way) - install and/or upgrade traffic signal/coordination at locations identified by the City's Traffic Monitoring Program in order to reduce congestion and intersection delays; coordinate regional traffic through the Regional Arterial Management System. TransNet - LSI RAMS of $8 is programmed through FY 2021 Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Intersection signalization projects Est Total Cost: $834
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $834 $228 $121 $177 $130 $178 $834 TOTAL $834 $228 $121 $177 $130 $178 $834 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $539 $216 $71 $28 $86 $138 $539 TOTAL $539 $216 $71 $28 $86 $138 $539
MPO ID: NC15 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Citywide Safe Routes to Schools TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Various locations throughout the City of National City - traffic calming and pedestrian safety/access enhancements for several schools on the eastside of the City Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $4,020
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $3,520 $900 $620 $500 $500 $500 $500 $900 $2,620 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $4,020 $1,400 $620 $500 $500 $500 $500 $1,400 $2,620 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $2,664 $900 $564 $200 $200 $400 $400 $900 $1,764 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $3,164 $1,400 $564 $200 $200 $400 $400 $1,400 $1,764
Page 15 Thursday, September 28, 2017
26 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
North County Transit District MPO ID: NCTD02 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Preventive Maintenance Project Description: NCTD service area - This project funds preventive maintenance for the District bus fixed route, rail, facilities, maintenance of way and signals. Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance Est Total Cost: $113,751
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,716 $1,716 $1,716 FTA 5307 $58,692 $11,746 $9,872 $12,809 $12,754 $11,510 $58,692 FTA 5337 $30,936 $9,476 $7,085 $4,598 $4,149 $5,628 $30,936 TDA $22,407 $5,306 $4,239 $4,352 $4,226 $4,284 $22,407 TOTAL $113,751 $28,244 $21,196 $21,759 $21,129 $21,422 $113,751 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-03 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $1,716 $1,716 $1,716 FTA 5307 $58,953 $12,008 $9,872 $12,809 $12,754 $11,510 $58,953 FTA 5337 $30,936 $9,476 $7,085 $4,598 $4,149 $5,628 $30,936 TDA $22,472 $5,371 $4,239 $4,352 $4,226 $4,284 $22,472 TOTAL $114,077 $28,571 $21,196 $21,759 $21,129 $21,422 $114,077
Page 16 Thursday, September 28, 2017
27 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
North County Transit District MPO ID: NCTD06 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Bus/Rail Support Equipment & Facilities Project Description: NCTD service area - This project funds District state of good repair projects, including the repair, replacement and upgrade of fixed route and rail operations facilities and equipment, with bus washes at the BREEZE East/West divisions, fire alarm and fuel crane metering at the COASTER Operations facility, supporting information systems, and the replacement of two (2) rail fleet support vehicles. Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Purchase of office, shop and operating equipment for existing facilities Est Total Cost: $37,674
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $18,335 $13,803 $2,944 $476 $500 $274 $337 $18,335 FTA 5309 (Bus) $332 $332 $332 FTA 5337 $7,218 $2,717 $591 $2,544 $1,366 $7,218 Transit Security (TSGP) $1,538 $1,538 $1,538 Local Funds $5,474 $5,474 $5,474 TDA $4,777 $2,119 $1,284 $119 $761 $410 $84 $4,777 TOTAL $37,674 $25,983 $4,819 $595 $3,805 $2,050 $421 $37,674 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-03 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $18,074 $13,803 $2,683 $476 $500 $274 $337 $18,074 FTA 5309 (Bus) $332 $332 $332 FTA 5337 $7,218 $2,717 $591 $2,544 $1,366 $7,218 Transit Security (TSGP) $1,538 $1,538 $1,538 Local Funds $5,474 $5,474 $5,474 TDA $4,711 $2,119 $1,218 $119 $761 $410 $84 $4,711 TOTAL $37,347 $25,983 $4,492 $595 $3,805 $2,050 $421 $37,347
Page 17 Thursday, September 28, 2017
28 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Oceanside, City of MPO ID: O18 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Neighborhood Sidewalk/ADA/Traffic Improvements TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: The yearly list of neighborhoods with scheduled road maintenance is available upon request - in Oceanside, slurry sealing of streets, sidewalk repair, parkway and median landscape maintenance, minor storm drain culvert maintenance, and streetlight repairs; work each year is scheduled by neighborhood Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $17,679
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,150 $1,150 $1,150 TransNet - L (Cash) $600 $600 $600 TransNet - LSI $8,859 $1,899 $1,865 $1,565 $1,665 $1,865 $8,859 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $6,070 $5,500 $570 $6,070 Local Funds $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 TOTAL $17,679 $9,149 $570 $2,865 $1,565 $1,665 $1,865 $17,679 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,150 $1,150 $1,150 TransNet - L (Cash) $600 $600 $600 TransNet - LSI $8,859 $1,899 $1,865 $1,565 $1,665 $1,865 $8,859 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $6,070 $5,500 $570 $6,070 TOTAL $16,679 $9,149 $570 $1,865 $1,565 $1,665 $1,865 $16,679
Page 18 Thursday, September 28, 2017
29 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Poway, City of MPO ID: POW20 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: 16/17 Annual Reconstruction and Overlay Project RAS (M-41; M-42) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: In Poway Reconstruct localized arterial reconstruction on Scripps Poway Parkway from Kirkham St to East City Limits. Additional scope to include Poway Rd from Community Rd to west City limits, Pomerado Rd from Poway Rd to south City limits and Ted Williams Pkwy from Pomerado Rd to west City limits - reconstruct and Overlay Streets greater than 1" thick AC Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $1,065
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $893 $893 $893 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $172 $172 $172 TOTAL $1,065 $1,065 $1,065 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $918 $918 $918 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $172 $172 $172 TOTAL $1,090 $1,090 $1,090
MPO ID: POW28 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Street Maintenance Project Zones 7 (16/17) and 8 (17/18) TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Zone 7 16/17, Zone 8 17/18 - in Poway; street maintenance project; construct slurry and CAPE seals on City Streets on an annually rotating zones Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $893
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $893 $450 $443 $893 TOTAL $893 $450 $443 $893 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $918 $450 $468 $918 TOTAL $918 $450 $468 $918
Page 19 Thursday, September 28, 2017
30 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Poway, City of MPO ID: POW30 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Street Maintenance Project Zone 1 (18/19), Zone 2 (19/20) TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Zone 1 (18/19), Zone 2 (19/20) - in Poway; street maintenance project; construct slurry and CAPE seals on City streets on an annually rotating zones Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $922
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $922 $452 $470 $922 TOTAL $922 $452 $470 $922 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $988 $481 $507 $988 TOTAL $988 $481 $507 $988
MPO ID: POW31 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: 17/18 Annual Street Reconstruction and Overlay Project TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: in Poway - Pomerado, Poway Francine Terrace and Residential Streets within Street Maintenance Zone 1 to be identified - overlay and reconstruct streets greater than 1" thick AC Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise project scope Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $847
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $847 $847 $847 TOTAL $847 $847 $847 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $886 $886 $886 TOTAL $886 $886 $886
Page 20 Thursday, September 28, 2017
31 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Poway, City of MPO ID: POW32 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: 18/19 Annual Street Reconstruction and Overlay Project TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: In Poway - localized arterial reconstruction on Espola Road - Reconstruct and overlay streets greater than 1" thick AC. - in Poway; overlay and reconstruct streets greater than 1" thick AC Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $220
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $220 $220 $220 TOTAL $220 $220 $220 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $236 $236 $236 TOTAL $236 $236 $236
MPO ID: POW33 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Poway Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Project RAS (M-41) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Poway Rd from Oak Knoll Rd to Garden Rd - in Poway; reconstruct and raise the center raised medians on Poway Road from Garden Road to Oak Knoll Road; Phase 1 Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Adding medians Est Total Cost: $870
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $870 $870 $870 TOTAL $870 $870 $870 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $900 $900 $900 TOTAL $900 $900 $900
Page 21 Thursday, September 28, 2017
32 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Poway, City of MPO ID: POW38 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: 20/21 Annual Reconstruction and Overlay Project TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Various Locations - In Poway - Reconstruct residential and arterial roads to be identified - overlay and reconstruct streets greater than 1" thick AC Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $500
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $500 $500 $500 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $825 $825 $825 TOTAL $825 $825 $825
MPO ID: POW39 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Street Maintenance Project Zone 3 (20/21) TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Zone 3 - In Poway - Zone 3 (20/21) street maintenance project; construct slurry and CAPE seals on City Streets on an annual rotating zone Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $489
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $489 $489 $489 TOTAL $489 $489 $489 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $528 $528 $528 TOTAL $528 $528 $528
Page 22 Thursday, September 28, 2017
33 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Poway, City of MPO ID: POW40 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: 19/20 Annual Street Reconstruction and Overlay Project RAS (M-41) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Espola Road from West City Limits to Lake Poway Rd - In Poway - Arterial localized reconstruction on Espola Rd from West City Limits to Lake Poway Rd; Overlay and Reconstruct streets greater than 1" thick AC Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $250
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $250 $250 $250 TOTAL $250 $250 $250 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $277 $277 $277 TOTAL $277 $277 $277
Page 23 Thursday, September 28, 2017
34 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN66 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, SANDAG ID: 1210020, Track, and Trackbed in Existing Rights-of-Way: Blue Line Corridor 1210030, 1210040, 1210050, 1210070 Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories - rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track and trackbed in existing rights-of-way (non-capacity increasing) Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures Est Total Cost: $278,365
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $96,185 $92,240 $3,765 $176 $3 $96,185 FTA 5307 $11,313 $11,313 $11,313 FTA 5309 (NS) $335 $335 $335 FTA Funds - AR-5307 $42,903 $42,903 $42,903 FTA Funds - AR-5309 $2,011 $2,011 $2,011 Prop 1A - High Speed Rail $57,855 $57,855 $57,855 Prop 1B - SLPP $45,851 $45,851 $45,851 Local Funds $21,912 $21,912 $21,912 TOTAL $278,365 $274,420 $3,765 $176 $3 $278,365 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $96,185 $92,367 $3,719 $98 $1 $96,185 FTA 5307 $11,313 $11,313 $11,313 FTA 5309 (NS) $335 $335 $335 FTA Funds - AR-5307 $42,903 $42,903 $42,903 FTA Funds - AR-5309 $2,011 $2,011 $2,011 Prop 1A - High Speed Rail $57,855 $57,855 $57,855 Prop 1B - SLPP $45,851 $45,851 $45,851 Local Funds $21,912 $21,912 $21,912 TOTAL $278,365 $274,547 $3,719 $98 $1 $278,365
Page 24 Thursday, September 28, 2017
35 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN114 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, SANDAG ID: 1239803, Track, and Trackbed in Exisiting Rights-of-Way: Coastal Rail Corridor 1239805, 1239810, 1239813, 1239814, 1239815, 1239816 Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories: rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in existing right-of-way (non-capacity increasing)- from Oceanside to San Diego along the Coastal Rail Corridor; design track improvements Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $217,916
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $106,562 $12,273 $19,748 $9,493 $28,228 $32,000 $4,820 $106,562 CMAQ $64,154 $64,154 $64,154 FTA 5307 $1,765 $1,765 $1,765 FTA 5339 $5,321 $5,321 $5,321 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $7,300 $7,300 $7,300 Other Fed - ARRA - FRA $3,360 $3,360 $3,360 RSTP $25,136 $10,136 $15,000 $25,136 CAP-TRADE $4,017 $4,017 $4,017 Local Funds $301 $301 $301 TOTAL $217,916 $104,309 $24,066 $24,493 $28,228 $32,000 $4,820 $217,916 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $106,562 $12,274 $20,315 $8,955 $28,198 $32,000 $4,820 $106,562 CMAQ $64,154 $64,154 $64,154 FTA 5307 $1,765 $1,765 $1,765 FTA 5339 $5,321 $5,321 $5,321 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $7,300 $7,300 $7,300 Other Fed - ARRA - FRA $3,360 $3,360 $3,360 RSTP $25,136 $10,136 $15,000 $25,136 CAP-TRADE $4,017 $4,017 $4,017 Local Funds $301 $301 $301 TOTAL $217,916 $104,310 $24,633 $23,955 $28,198 $32,000 $4,820 $217,916
Page 25 Thursday, September 28, 2017
36 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN132 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Elvira to Morena Double Track SANDAG ID: 1239811
Project Description: On coastal rail corridor from Control Point (CP) Elvira near SR 52 to CP Friar near Friars Road - convert 2.6 miles of single-track to double-track and install new signals. Replace 1 mile of double track. Construct new/replacement bridges at MP 260.4, 259.6, 259.1, 258.6, and 257.2. Construct new water/sewer facilites for the City of San Diego between Friars Road and SR 52 - does not add additional transit service Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way Est Total Cost: $192,521
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $44,611 $6,504 $324 $23,288 $13,945 $550 $6,098 $807 $37,706 TransNet - MC AC $0 $37,939 $12,056 $(49,995) CMAQ $24,878 $24,878 $2,776 $22,102 FTA 5307 $2,080 $2,080 $2,080 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $9,920 $9,920 $6,082 $3,838 RSTP $29,688 $17,878 $11,810 $4,688 $927 $24,073 CAP-TRADE $61,983 $49,995 $11,988 $61,983 TCRP $4,052 $4,052 $4,052 Local Funds $13,089 $2,999 $6,639 $3,451 $13,089 TDA $2,220 $2,220 $786 $1,434 TOTAL $192,521 $64,259 $101,189 $39,305 $(26,707) $13,945 $550 $22,510 $1,734 $168,277 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $44,611 $6,504 $2,752 $6,167 $13,631 $15,007 $550 $8,003 $1,324 $35,284 TransNet - MC AC $0 $2,752 $(2,752) CMAQ $24,878 $24,878 $2,776 $22,102 FTA 5307 $2,080 $2,080 $2,080 Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $9,920 $9,920 $6,082 $3,838 RSTP $29,688 $4,688 $20,000 $5,000 $4,688 $25,000 CAP-TRADE $61,983 $49,995 $11,988 $61,983 TCRP $4,052 $4,052 $4,052 Local Funds $13,089 $2,999 $10,090 $13,089 TDA $2,220 $2,220 $2,220 TOTAL $192,521 $51,069 $71,861 $23,415 $30,619 $15,007 $550 $21,549 $1,324 $169,648
Page 26 Thursday, September 28, 2017
37 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN228 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Uptown Bikeways SANDAG ID: 1223022, 1223083, 1223084, 1223085, 1223086 Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories - bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and non-motorized) Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $29,500
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $27,602 $4,585 $733 $1,288 $12,066 $8,756 $174 $27,602 TransNet - SGIP $648 $40 $608 $648 TDA - Bicycles $1,250 $720 $530 $1,250 TOTAL $29,500 $4,585 $1,453 $1,858 $12,674 $8,756 $174 $29,500 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $27,601 $4,585 $733 $1,288 $12,122 $8,699 $174 $27,601 TransNet - SGIP $648 $348 $300 $648 TDA - Bicycles $1,251 $1,251 $1,251 TOTAL $29,500 $4,585 $1,984 $1,636 $12,422 $8,699 $174 $29,500
Page 27 Thursday, September 28, 2017
38 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD09 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Sidewalks - Citywide RAS (M-39) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: FY 2017: San Diego Mission Road to Fairmount; Mission Village Sidewalk, Genesee/Sauk, Market St-47th to Euclid; RTCIP funded locations Genesee Ave, University Ave, and Balboa Ave, FY18 proposed locations:, 70th St-Alvarado to Saranac , 73rd St-El Cajon Blvd to Saranac , Brooklyn St-61 St to 63rd , Chateau Dr-Derrick to Mt Abenathy , Coast Blvd-Cuvier St to Coast S , Franklin Av– 49th-S Willie James Jones , Howard Ave-Village Pine to Iris, Saturn Blvd-Palm to Boundary , W. San Ysidro Blvd & Sunset Ln , - install new sidewalks (CIP 52-700/715, 59-002.0,37-064.0/ABE00001, AIK00001, AIK00003), including the addition of RTCIP funding to this project for the installation of sidewalks on streets included in the RAS: Genesee Ave, University Ave, and Balboa Ave. Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $16,856
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $2,150 $2,150 $2,150 TransNet - L (Cash) $411 $411 $411 TransNet - LSI $8,818 $3,569 $1,399 $850 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $8,818 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $62 $62 $62 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,915 $2,385 $530 $2,915 Local RTCIP $2,500 $100 $2,400 $2,500 TOTAL $16,856 $8,204 $4,802 $850 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $16,856 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $2,150 $2,150 $2,150 TransNet - L (Cash) $411 $411 $411 TransNet - LSI $8,968 $3,569 $1,399 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $8,968 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $62 $62 $62 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,915 $2,385 $530 $2,915 Local RTCIP $2,500 $100 $2,400 $2,500 TOTAL $17,006 $8,204 $4,802 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $17,006
Page 28 Thursday, September 28, 2017
39 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD16A RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Traffic Signals – Citywide RAS (M-43 & 44) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: New traffic signal installation at multiple locations:, 31st & National, Bernardo Heights & Calle Pueblito, Governor Dr & Lakewood, Traffic signal mods Citywide:, Mission Village & Ruffin, Civita & Mission Center, 1st & Ash, 11th & Broadway, Cass & Turquoise, Lake Murray & Turnbridge, 47th & Imperial, 3rd Ave @ Washington St , 4th Ave & Date St, 15th/Broadway, 15th/F 15th/Market , 17th/G , 31th St. & National Ave. , 41st St @ National Ave , Averil Rd @ San Ysidro , Bernardo Heights & Calle P , Beyer Bl @ Smythe Ave , Pacific Hwy/Beech , Traffic Signal Interconnects:, Carmel Valley, Mission Valley, Otay Mesa, San Ysidro, Rancho Bernardo,, Tierrasanta/Murphy Canyon - install new traffic signals with intersection street lighting systems, upgrade/modernize traffic signals, install protected/permissive traffic signal systems; traffic signal interconnect systems and upgrades Citywide (CIP A-IL.00003, A-IL.00002, A-IL.00004, A-IL.00005). TransNet - LSI RAMS of $68 is programmed through FY 2021 Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Intersection signalization projects Est Total Cost: $29,554 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $4,280 $4,280 $4,280 TransNet - L (Cash) $45 $45 $45 TransNet - LSI $11,430 $2,169 $1,540 $1,618 $2,168 $1,968 $1,968 $11,430 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $7,749 $4,467 $3,282 $7,749 Local RTCIP $6,050 $3,200 $2,850 $6,050 TOTAL $29,554 $14,116 $7,717 $1,618 $2,168 $1,968 $1,968 $29,554 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-04 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $4,280 $4,280 $4,280 TransNet - L (Cash) $45 $45 $45 TransNet - LSI $11,580 $2,169 $1,540 $1,968 $1,968 $1,968 $1,968 $11,580 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $7,749 $4,467 $3,282 $7,749 Local RTCIP $6,050 $3,200 $2,850 $6,050 TOTAL $29,704 $14,116 $7,717 $1,968 $1,968 $1,968 $1,968 $29,704
Page 29 Thursday, September 28, 2017
40 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD18 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Traffic Control Measures TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: University Avenue-Fairmount to Euclid Complete Street and traffic control and calming measures in multiple locations Citywide: 20 rectangular rapid flashing beacons; 10 V-Calm signs - traffic control and traffic calming measures (CIP 61-001.0 / AIL00001) including electronic speed signs, pedestrian hybrid beacons, rectangular rapid flashing beacons Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operating Est Total Cost: $9,745
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 TransNet - L (Cash) $741 $587 $154 $741 TransNet - LSI $4,946 $701 $860 $385 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $4,946 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,087 $1,384 $703 $2,087 Local Funds $371 $371 $371 TOTAL $9,745 $4,643 $1,717 $385 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $9,745 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 TransNet - L (Cash) $741 $587 $154 $741 TransNet - LSI $5,561 $701 $860 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $5,561 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,087 $1,384 $703 $2,087 Local Funds $371 $371 $371 TOTAL $10,360 $4,643 $1,717 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $10,360
Page 30 Thursday, September 28, 2017
41 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD19 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Streamview Drive TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Streamview Drive from Lynn/Michael to Gayle - in San Diego, on Streamview Drive from Lynn/Michael Streets to Gayle Street installation of new raised median, new sidewalk including curb & gutter, and traffic circles to improve the flow of traffic and increase safety (CIP 52-588.0,S-00864) Change Reason: Revise project description Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Adding medians Est Total Cost: $4,452
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $350 $350 $350 TransNet - L (Cash) $77 $77 $77 TransNet - LSI $180 $180 $180 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,245 $1,631 $1,614 $448 $2,797 Local Funds $600 $600 $600 TOTAL $4,452 $2,161 $2,291 $978 $3,474 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $350 $350 $350 TransNet - L (Cash) $77 $77 $77 TransNet - LSI $180 $180 $180 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,245 $1,631 $1,614 $448 $2,797 Local Funds $600 $600 $600 TOTAL $4,452 $2,161 $2,291 $978 $3,474
Page 31 Thursday, September 28, 2017
42 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD49 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Median Improvements Citywide TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Morena Bl - Ashton St to Littlefield St, University Ave - Winona to 5th, Traffic Circles at various locations:, Crown Point Dr at La Cima , Crown Point Dr at Moorland Ave , Crown Point Dr at Lamont St , Foothill Boulevard & Loring Street, , - safety improvements and/or left turn movements (AIG00001) Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Safety Improvement Program Est Total Cost: $5,445
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $744 $641 $103 $744 TransNet - LSI $1,288 $400 $438 $150 $100 $100 $100 $1,288 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,086 $983 $1,103 $2,086 Local Funds $1,327 $1,327 $1,102 $225 TOTAL $5,445 $3,351 $1,644 $150 $100 $100 $100 $1,102 $4,343 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $744 $641 $103 $744 TransNet - LSI $1,238 $400 $438 $100 $100 $100 $100 $1,238 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,086 $983 $1,103 $2,086 Local Funds $1,327 $1,327 $1,102 $225 TOTAL $5,395 $3,351 $1,644 $100 $100 $100 $100 $1,102 $4,293
Page 32 Thursday, September 28, 2017
43 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD83 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: SR 163/Friars Road Interchange Modification RTP PG NO: B-39 RAS (M - 46) Project Description: Friars Road from Avenida de las Tiendas to Mission Center Road - widen TransNet - LSI: CR and improve Friars Road and overcrossing; reconstruct interchange including improvements to ramp intersections (Phase 1); construct new connector roadways and structures (Phase 2); construct auxilliary lanes along northbound and southbound SR163 (Phase 3) (CIP Legacy#52-455.0,WBS# S-00851) Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $61,393 Open to Traffic: Sep 2019
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $2,207 $2,207 $2,207 TransNet - LSI $21,300 $13,391 $3,000 $2,000 $2,909 $2,227 $19,073 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,905 $3,068 $836 $2,975 $930 RSTP $2,240 $2,240 $2,240 Local Funds $20,111 $12,026 $8,086 $1,153 $3,120 $15,838 Local RTCIP $11,630 $4,930 $6,700 $2,980 $8,650 TOTAL $61,393 $37,862 $18,622 $2,000 $2,909 $10,802 $6,100 $44,491 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $2,207 $2,207 $2,207 TransNet - LSI $18,391 $13,391 $3,000 $2,000 $2,227 $16,164 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,905 $3,068 $836 $2,975 $930 Earmark Repurposing $1,086 $1,086 $1,086 RSTP $2,240 $2,240 $2,240 Local Funds $19,026 $12,026 $7,000 $1,153 $3,120 $14,753 Local RTCIP $11,630 $4,930 $6,700 $2,980 $8,650 TOTAL $58,485 $37,862 $18,622 $2,000 $10,802 $6,100 $41,583
Page 33 Thursday, September 28, 2017
44 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD96 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Street Resurfacing Citywide TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citywide - in San Diego, resurface/overlay greater than 1 inch on city streets; this project includes replacement/rehabilitation of concrete streets (AID00005/AID00006) Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $71,306
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 TransNet - L (Cash) $950 $934 $15 $950 TransNet - LSI $48,543 $7,436 $2,067 $6,646 $15,699 $16,695 $48,543 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $1,323 $1,175 $148 $1,323 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $6,221 $4,118 $2,103 $6,221 Local Funds $10,269 $10,269 $10,269 TOTAL $71,306 $27,932 $2,266 $2,067 $6,646 $15,699 $16,695 $71,306 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 TransNet - L (Cash) $950 $934 $15 $950 TransNet - LSI $55,214 $7,436 $2,880 $10,590 $16,617 $17,690 $55,214 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $1,323 $1,175 $148 $1,323 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $6,221 $4,118 $2,103 $6,221 Local Funds $10,269 $10,269 $10,269 TOTAL $77,977 $27,932 $2,266 $2,880 $10,590 $16,617 $17,690 $77,977
Page 34 Thursday, September 28, 2017
45 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD99 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Bridge Rehabilitation RAS (M-43) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citywide - in San Diego, bridge retrofit or replacement projects citywide (AIE00001) including Voltaire Street Bridge over Nimitz Blvd. rehabilitation (CIP 525233/B00870) and Barnett Ave. Bridge over Pacific Highway (CIP 525231/B00869); and RTCIP funding allocated to this project for the Fairmount Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation project. Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction Est Total Cost: $4,484
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $300 $300 $300 TransNet - LSI $1,991 $191 $250 $50 $500 $500 $500 $1,991 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,593 $184 $1,409 $1,593 Local RTCIP $600 $600 $600 TOTAL $4,484 $675 $2,259 $50 $500 $500 $500 $4,484 * Local fund match for Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program - HBP CAL44 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-04 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $300 $300 $300 TransNet - LSI $2,441 $191 $250 $500 $500 $500 $500 $2,441 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,593 $184 $1,409 $1,593 Local RTCIP $600 $600 $600 TOTAL $4,934 $675 $2,259 $500 $500 $500 $500 $4,934
Page 35 Thursday, September 28, 2017
46 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD108 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Bayshore Bikeway TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Along Bayshore Bikeway - in San Diego at the borders of Imperial Beach (13th Street) and Chula Vista (Main Street, design/construct Class I bike path (581400,S-00944) Change Reason: Add new funding source Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $5,591
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - B $718 $718 $275 $443 TransNet - LSI $20 $20 $20 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $330 $300 $30 $330 TransNet - MC $3,774 $3,774 $1,284 $2,490 PTA $90 $90 $90 Local Funds $35 $35 $35 TDA - Bicycles $624 $624 $624 TOTAL $5,591 $5,506 $50 $35 $1,649 $3,942 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - B $718 $718 $275 $443 TransNet - LSI $55 $20 $35 $55 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $330 $300 $30 $330 TransNet - MC $3,774 $3,774 $1,284 $2,490 PTA $90 $90 $90 TDA - Bicycles $624 $624 $624 TOTAL $5,591 $5,506 $50 $35 $1,649 $3,942
Page 36 Thursday, September 28, 2017
47 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD129 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: University Avenue Mobility Project Phase 1 RAS (M - 49) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: University Avenue from Florida Street to Boundary Street - in San Diego, environmental studies, design and construction of improvement to University Avenue transit corridor in North Park improvements include installation of new medians for safety improvements, restriping, pedestrian popouts, new traffic signals, traffic signal modifications, enhanced pedestrian crossings and installation of a transit/bicycle/right turn only lane(augments Smart Growth Funding for this project in V10) (CIP S-00915) Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Adding medians Est Total Cost: $5,906
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $175 $175 $175 TransNet - L (Cash) $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI $4,617 $667 $1,200 $2,750 $635 $3,982 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $764 $191 $572 $45 $719 Local Funds $150 $150 $150 TOTAL $5,906 $1,383 $1,772 $2,750 $1,055 $4,851 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $175 $175 $175 TransNet - L (Cash) $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI $3,867 $667 $1,200 $2,000 $635 $3,232 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $764 $191 $572 $45 $719 Local Funds $150 $150 $150 TOTAL $5,156 $1,383 $1,772 $2,000 $1,055 $4,101
Page 37 Thursday, September 28, 2017
48 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD166 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Minor Bicycle Facilities EARMARK NO: 317/90 TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citywide including:, El Camino Real/State Route 56 Bike Path Connector (S00981); SR56 Bike Interchanges (S00955) Downtown Bicyle Loop; Bikeway Striping Improvements Citywide (AIA00001)including Cycle Tracks - install Bicycle Facilities (AIA00001) Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $5,546
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $15 $15 $15 TransNet - L (Cash) $136 $136 $136 TransNet - LSI $3,422 $22 $750 $400 $750 $750 $750 $15 $3,407 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,613 $806 $806 $1,613 HPP $360 $360 $53 $307 TOTAL $5,546 $1,339 $1,556 $400 $750 $750 $750 $68 $5,478 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - L $15 $15 $15 TransNet - L (Cash) $136 $136 $136 TransNet - LSI $3,772 $22 $750 $750 $750 $750 $750 $15 $3,757 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,633 $826 $806 $1,633 HPP $360 $360 $53 $307 TOTAL $5,916 $1,359 $1,556 $750 $750 $750 $750 $68 $5,848
MPO ID: SD176 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Maintenance and Non Congestion Relief Efforts TransNet - LSI: Maint Project Description: Citywide - in San Diego, maintenance and non congestion relief efforts including but not limited to pavement overlay, pot hole repair, etc Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $121,247
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $104,958 $54,329 $9,591 $9,644 $10,053 $10,457 $10,884 $104,958 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $16,289 $16,289 $16,289 TOTAL $121,247 $70,618 $9,591 $9,644 $10,053 $10,457 $10,884 $121,247 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $106,480 $54,329 $9,591 $9,992 $10,410 $10,849 $11,309 $106,480 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $16,289 $16,289 $16,289 TOTAL $122,769 $70,618 $9,591 $9,992 $10,410 $10,849 $11,309 $122,769
Page 38 Thursday, September 28, 2017
49 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD186 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Administrative Expenses TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citywide - City of San Diego 1% administrative costs
Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Non construction related activities Est Total Cost: $3,673
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $3,199 $1,496 $323 $325 $337 $351 $366 $3,199 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $474 $472 $1 $1 $474 TOTAL $3,673 $1,968 $323 $325 $338 $352 $366 $3,673 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $3,252 $1,496 $323 $336 $351 $365 $381 $3,252 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $472 $472 $472 TOTAL $3,724 $1,968 $323 $336 $351 $365 $381 $3,724
MPO ID: SD190 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Palm Avenue/Interstate 805 Interchange RTP PG NO: B-40 RAS (M - 48) Project Description: On Palm Avenue at Interstate 805; - threshold traffic volumes within the Otay Mesa Community of the City of San Diego have been met, necessitating improvements to the Palm Avenue Bridge over I-805; project will also include repairs to the bridge approaches that are showing signs of failure; a new Project Study Report (PSR) and Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (PEAR) are needed to consider all conditions within the project vicinity - Phase II of the project will include widening of the bridge, realignment of existing ramps, possible addition of northbound looping entrance ramp, restriping of traffic lanes, and signal modifications; Phase III will provide the ultimate build-out of the project which will incorporate improvements of Phase II plus the northbound and southbound entrance ramps (CIP 52-640.0) Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise Open to Traffic Dates Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $27,869 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Jun 2008 Phase 2: Jun 2020 Phase 3: Jun 2028
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON Local Funds $27,869 $7,369 $20,500 $7,119 $250 $20,500 TOTAL $27,869 $7,369 $20,500 $7,119 $250 $20,500 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON Local Funds $17,369 $7,369 $10,000 $7,119 $250 $10,000 TOTAL $17,369 $7,369 $10,000 $7,119 $250 $10,000
Page 39 Thursday, September 28, 2017
50 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD248 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Avenida De La Playa Infrastructure Project TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Along Avenida de la Playa from Paseo Grande to ocean outfall - In San Diego - storm drain system replacement (CIP S-13018) Change Reason: Increase funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Damage repair caused by unusual disasters Est Total Cost: $6,000
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $6,000 $5,000 $1,000 $6,000 TOTAL $6,000 $5,000 $1,000 $6,000 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-01 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 TOTAL $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
MPO ID: SD249 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Streamview Drive Improvements Phase 2 TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Streamview Drive from 54th to College - In San Diego on Streamview Drive from 54th and Lynn/Michael Street and Streamview Drive between Gayle Street and College Avenue-installation of new raised median, new sidewalk including curb and gutter, and traffic circles (CIP S-18000) Change Reason: New project Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Adding medians Est Total Cost: $150
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $150 $150 $150 TOTAL $150 $150 $150
Page 40 Thursday, September 28, 2017
51 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Transportation Corridor Agencies MPO ID: TCA01 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Foothill Transportation Corridor South RTP PG NO: A-5, B-30 Project Description: From I-5 to Orange/San Diego County Line - construct 2 general purpose toll lanes to/from I-5 to Orange/San Diego County Line Change Reason: Revise budget, schedule to reflect 11/16 Settlement Agreement RT:241 Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt Est Total Cost: $298,106 Open to Traffic: Dec 2025
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON Local Funds $178,390 $114,111 $9,891 $13,332 $24,809 $9,247 $7,000 $161,034 $17,356 TOTAL $178,390 $114,111 $9,891 $13,332 $24,809 $9,247 $7,000 $161,034 $17,356 * Funding Source = Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA). In Nov. 2016, TCA reached a Settlement Agreement that requires a new EIR/EIS to evaluate route alternatives. Additional funding for PE phase are outside of the 5-year RTIP cycle PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-00 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON Local Funds $392,423 $114,111 $59,949 $118,367 $99,996 $114,839 $27,594 $249,990 TOTAL $392,423 $114,111 $59,949 $118,367 $99,996 $114,839 $27,594 $249,990
Page 41 Thursday, September 28, 2017
52 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Various Agencies MPO ID: V10 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program SANDAG ID: 12240036, 1224019, 1224021, 1224022, 1224025, 1224027, 1224028, Project Description: Projects are consistent with CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt 1224029, 1224030, 1224031, Tables 2 and 3 categories: transportation enhancement activities (except 1224032, 1224033, 1224034, rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, 1224035, 1224037, 1224038, structures, or facilities) 1224039, 1224040, 1224041, 1224042, 1224043, 1224044 Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Transportation enhancement activities Est Total Cost: $29,766
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $3,700 $2,700 $500 $500 $3,700 TransNet - LSI $2,763 $850 $1,013 $900 $2,763 TransNet - SGIP $12,572 $1,736 $5,198 $4,060 $1,577 $12,572 Local Funds $10,731 $2,469 $3,277 $4,861 $126 $10,731 TOTAL $29,766 $4,205 $12,025 $10,434 $3,103 $29,766 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $3,700 $2,700 $500 $500 $3,700 TransNet - LSI $2,763 $850 $1,013 $900 $2,763 TransNet - SGIP $13,272 $2,402 $5,232 $4,060 $1,577 $13,272 Local Funds $10,731 $2,469 $3,277 $4,861 $126 $10,731 TOTAL $30,466 $4,871 $12,059 $10,434 $3,103 $30,466
MPO ID: V12 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities. SANDAG ID: 1223036, 1223044, 1223045, 1223054, Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 1223057, 1223058, 1223059, categories - bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and 1223060, 1223062, 1223063, non-motorized) 1223064, 1223065 Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $30,089
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $25,639 $2,116 $3,116 $3,329 $9,145 $3,957 $3,976 $25,639 ATP - S $4,450 $4,450 $4,450 TOTAL $30,089 $2,116 $3,116 $3,329 $9,145 $8,407 $3,976 $30,089 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-06 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $28,089 $3,685 $3,797 $3,529 $9,145 $3,957 $3,976 $28,089 ATP - S $4,450 $4,450 $4,450 Local Funds $310 $310 $310 TOTAL $32,849 $3,995 $3,797 $3,529 $9,145 $8,407 $3,976 $32,849
Page 42 Thursday, September 28, 2017
53 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
Various Agencies MPO ID: V17 RTIP #:16-08
Project Title: Grouped Projects for TransNet Active Transportation Grant Program (ATGP) SANDAG ID: 1223068, 1223069, 1223070, 1223071, 1223072, 1223074, 1223076, Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 1223077 categories - bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and non-motorized) Change Reason: Reduce funding Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $6,148
TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $1,054 $1,054 $1,054 TransNet - L (Cash) $52 $52 $52 TransNet - LSI $10 $10 $10 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $349 $7 $186 $156 $349 Local Funds $2,040 $30 $1,013 $360 $636 $2,040 TDA - Bicycles $2,643 $205 $773 $1,132 $469 $64 $2,643 TOTAL $6,148 $294 $3,026 $1,658 $1,105 $64 $6,148 PROJECT LAST AMENDED 16-04 TOTAL PRIOR 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 PE RW CON TransNet - BPNS $1,054 $1,054 $1,054 TransNet - L (Cash) $52 $52 $52 TransNet - LSI $10 $10 $10 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $349 $7 $186 $156 $349 Local Funds $2,085 $42 $1,044 $363 $636 $2,085 TDA - Bicycles $2,933 $286 $957 $1,156 $469 $64 $2,933 TOTAL $6,483 $387 $3,241 $1,685 $1,105 $64 $6,483
Page 43 Thursday, September 28, 2017
54 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
RTIP Fund Types
Federal Funding ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Federal Stimulus Program) BIP/CBI Border Infrastructure Program/Corridors and Borders Infrastructure Program CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality DEMO-Sec 117/STP Surface Transportation Program under FHWA Administrative Program (congressionally directed appropriations) EARREPU Earmark Repurposing FRA-ARRA Federal Railroad Administration (Federal Stimulus) FRA-PRIIA Federal Railroad Administration Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 FTA Section 5307 Federal Transit Administration Urbanized Area Formula Program FTA Section 5309 (Bus) Federal Transit Administration Discretionary Program FTA Section 5309 (NS) Federal Transit Administration Discretionary - New Starts Program FTA Section 5337 Federal Transit Administration State of Good Repair Grant Program FTA Section 5339 Federal Transit Administration Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grant Program HPP High Priority Program under SAFETEA-LU NHS National Highway System (administered by Caltrans) RSTP Regional Surface Transportation Program STP-RL Surface Transportation Program - Highway Railway Crossings Program (Section 130) TSGP Transit Security Grant Program (Federal Discretionary) CMAQ/RSTP Conversion Reimbursement of advanced federal funds which have been advanced with local funds in earlier years State Funding ATP Active Transportation Program (Statewide and Regional) CMIA Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (State Prop. 1B) Prop 1A - High Speed Rail High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (State Prop. 1A) PTA Public Transportation Account SLPP State Local Partnership Program (State Prop. 1B) STIP-RIP State Transportation Improvement Program - Regional Improvement Program TCRP Traffic Congestion Relief Program TSGP Transit Security Grant Program (State Prop. 1B) Local Funding RTCIP Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program TDA Transportation Development Act TDA-B Transportation Development Act-Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities TransNet-B Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Bike TransNet-BPNS Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety Program TransNet-CP Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Commercial Paper
Page 44 Thursday, September 28, 2017
55 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 8 San Diego Region (in $000s)
TransNet-L Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local Streets & Roads TransNet-L (Cash) TransNet - L funds which agencies have received payment, but have not spent TransNet-LSI Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local System Improvements TransNet-LSI Carry Over TransNet - LSI funds previously programmed but not requested/paid in year of allocation TransNet-LSI (Cash) TransNet - LSI funds which agencies have received payment, but have not spent TransNet-MC Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Major Corridors TransNet-MC AC TransNet - Major Corridors - Advanced Construction; mechanism to advance TransNet funds to be reimbursed at a later fiscal year with federal/state funds TransNet-SGIP Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Smart Growth Incentive Program TransNet-T Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Transit
Page 45 Thursday, September 28, 2017
56 Table 2a: Revenues San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Attachment 3 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (in $000s)
2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 TOTAL Prior Years Funding Source Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Sales Tax $2,292,155 $566,620 $557,783 $604,937 $609,071 $602,613 $617,041 $449,406 $449,647 $554,486 $554,749 $5,079,710 $5,080,446 -- County $2,292,155 $566,620 $557,783 $604,937 $609,071 $602,613 $617,041 $449,406 $449,647 $554,486 $554,749 $5,079,710 $5,080,446 Other Local Funds $426,346 $109,976 $117,471 $189,987 $162,956 $600,778 $539,421 $224,734 $136,114 $225,629 $132,633 $1,777,772 $1,514,941 -- County General Funds -- City General Funds $285,412 $95,670 $93,275 $85,019 $79,656 $101,990 $101,990 $106,367 $126,867 $105,080 $105,080 $779,862 $792,281 -- Street Taxes and Developer Fees $140,934 $14,305 $24,196 $104,968 $83,300 $498,788 $437,431 $118,367 $9,247 $120,548 $27,552 $997,910 $722,660 -- RSTP Exchange funds Other $525,037 $105,578 $104,676 $74,473 $75,496 $59,182 $59,182 $52,761 $52,761 $57,492 $57,492 $874,604 $874,644 Local Total $3,243,538 $782,174 $779,930 $869,397 $847,523 $1,262,573 $1,215,644 $726,900 $638,521 $837,607 $744,874 $7,732,087 $7,470,030 State Highway Operations and Protection Program $33,819 $148,953 $148,953 $116,449 $145,532 $83,645 $69,750 $112,287 $150,476 $2,593 $2,593 $497,746 $551,123 SHOPP (Including Augmentation) $33,819 $148,953 $148,953 $116,449 $145,532 $83,645 $69,750 $112,287 $150,476 $2,593 $2,593 $497,746 $551,123 SHOPP Prior State Minor Program State Transportation Improvement Program $603,307 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $44,000 $44,000 $650,622 $650,622 STIP (Including Augmentation) $561,551 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $44,000 $44,000 $608,866 $608,866 Transportation Enhancement STIP Prior $41,756 $41,756 $41,756 Transportation Enhancement Proposition 1 A $99,698 $99,698 $99,698 STATE LOCAL Proposition 1 B $709,633 $3,124 $3,124 $1,342 $1,342 $714,098 $714,098 GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) $197,000 $197,000 $197,000 Highway Maintenance (HM) $1,951 $1,951 $1,951 $1,951 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) $155,194 $4,052 $4,052 $53,023 $218,465 $159,246 State Transit Assistance (e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) $96,445 $12,951 $12,951 $5,319 $5,319 $4,770 $4,770 $4,770 $4,770 $4,770 $4,770 $129,026 $129,026 Active Transportation Program $13,990 $4,538 $4,538 $11,481 $12,085 $15,120 $15,867 $4,919 $4,919 $2,449 $2,449 $52,497 $53,848 Other $20,779 $56,829 $56,829 $2,441 $14,429 $14,429 $2,441 $2,441 $2,441 $2,441 $2,441 $101,002 $99,360 State Total $1,929,864 $233,503 $233,503 $136,795 $178,470 $119,069 $93,933 $177,440 $162,606 $57,595 $57,595 $2,662,104 $2,655,972 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program $531,357 $66,534 $66,534 $67,865 $67,865 $69,222 $69,222 $69,222 $69,222 $69,222 $69,222 $873,422 $873,422 5308 - Clean Fuel Formula Program 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization $99,768 $99,768 $99,768 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) $123,331 $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $593,380 $593,380 $1,066,711 $1,066,711 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants $57,734 $57,734 $57,734 5310 - Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $3,391 $3,798 $3,798 $7,189 $7,189 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program $6,806 $965 $965 $893 $893 $893 $893 $893 $893 $893 $893 $11,345 $11,345 5316 - Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 5317 - New Freedom 5337 - State of Good Repair $130,176 $37,939 $37,939 $38,698 $38,698 $39,472 $39,472 $39,472 $39,472 $39,472 $39,472 $325,229 $325,229 FEDERAL TRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program $13,417 $4,974 $4,974 $5,073 $5,073 $5,175 $5,175 $5,175 $5,175 $5,175 $5,175 $38,987 $38,987 Other $93,839 $160 $160 $93,999 $93,999 Federal Transit Total $1,059,820 $164,370 $164,370 $212,529 $212,529 $214,762 $214,762 $214,762 $214,762 $708,142 $708,142 $2,574,384 $2,574,384 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) * $340,091 $32,148 $47,148 $27,721 $12,721 $33,531 $33,531 $34,223 $34,223 $34,223 $34,223 $501,936 $501,936 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) $192,381 $45,000 $192,381 $237,381 Corridor Infrastructure Improvement Program (SAFETEA-LU Sec. 1302) High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo $113,889 $5,841 $5,841 $1,000 $1,000 $120,731 $120,731 High Risk Rural Road (HRRR) Highway Bridge Program (HBP) $43,955 $6,396 $6,396 $7,818 $7,818 $3,630 $3,630 $22,159 $22,159 $296,847 $296,847 $380,804 $380,804 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $1,930 $5,155 $5,155 $3,842 $3,842 $12,583 $12,583 $13,231 $13,231 $36,740 $36,740 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) (SAFETEA-LU)
FEDERAL HIGHWAY Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $432,594 $39,156 $39,156 $41,522 $41,522 $43,072 $43,072 $44,862 $44,862 $44,862 $44,862 $632,879 $646,069 Other $248,299 $4,752 $3,667 $1,800 $1,800 $1,700 $1,700 $9 $9 $256,560 $255,474 Federal Highway Total $1,373,139 $93,449 $152,364 $83,703 $68,703 $94,515 $94,515 $114,474 $114,474 $375,941 $375,941 $2,122,031 $2,179,135 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) $26,479 $26,479 $26,479
FRA Other Federal Railroad Administration Total $26,479 $26,479 $26,479 Federal Total $2,459,438 $257,820 $316,734 $296,232 $281,232 $309,277 $309,277 $329,236 $329,236 $1,084,083 $1,084,083 $4,722,894 $4,779,999 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 VE VATI FINA
INNO Innovative Financing Total REVENUES TOTAL $7,632,841 $1,273,496 $1,330,166 $1,302,424 $1,307,224 $1,690,919 $1,618,854 $1,233,576 $1,130,363 $1,979,285 $1,886,552 $15,654,569 $14,906,001 *Revenues for CMAQ are increased in FY 2016/2017 due to borrowing from OCTA. Revenues are reduced in FY 2017/2018 due to a payback to VCTC and OCTA Yellow highlighting indicates a change from the previous report.
57 Table 2b: Program San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (in $000s)
2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 TOTAL Prior Years Funding Source Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current
Local Total $3,243,538 $754,658 $752,400 $846,443 $822,895 $1,245,363 $1,197,384 $721,166 $631,312 $825,999 $731,375 $7,647,064 $7,378,904 LOCAL
State Highway Operations and Protection Program $33,819 $148,953 $148,953 $116,449 $145,532 $83,645 $69,750 $112,287 $150,476 $2,593 $2,593 $497,746 $551,123 SHOPP (Including Augmentation) $33,819 $148,953 $148,953 $116,449 $145,532 $83,645 $69,750 $112,287 $150,476 $2,593 $2,593 $497,746 $551,123 State Transportation Improvement Program $603,307 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $44,000 $44,000 $650,622 $650,622 STIP (Including Augmentation) $561,551 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $44,000 $44,000 $608,866 $608,866 Transportation Enhancement STIP Prior $41,756 $41,756 $41,756 Transportation Enhancement Proposition 1 A $99,698 $99,698 $99,698 Proposition 1 B $709,633 $3,124 $3,124 $1,342 $1,342 $714,098 $714,098 STATE GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) $197,000 $197,000 $197,000 Highway Maintenance (HM) $1,951 $1,951 $1,951 $1,951 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) $155,194 $4,052 $4,052 $53,023 $218,465 $159,246 State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) $96,445 $12,951 $12,951 $5,319 $5,319 $4,770 $4,770 $4,770 $4,770 $4,770 $4,770 $129,026 $129,026 Active Transportation Program $13,990 $4,538 $4,538 $11,481 $12,085 $15,120 $15,867 $4,919 $4,919 $2,449 $2,449 $52,497 $53,848 Other $20,779 $56,829 $56,829 $2,441 $14,429 $14,429 $2,441 $2,441 $2,441 $2,441 $2,441 $101,002 $99,360 State Total $1,929,864 $233,503 $233,503 $136,795 $178,470 $119,069 $93,933 $177,440 $162,606 $57,595 $57,595 $2,662,104 $2,655,972 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program $531,357 $66,534 $66,534 $67,129 $67,129 $68,473 $68,473 $68,473 $68,473 $66,369 $66,369 $868,336 $868,336 5308 - Clean Fuel Formula Program 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization $99,768 $99,768 $99,768 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) $123,331 $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $593,380 $593,380 $1,066,711 $1,066,711 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants $57,734 $57,734 $57,734 5310 - Elderly & Persons with Disabilities Formula Program $3,391 $3,798 $3,798 $7,189 $7,189 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program $6,806 $965 $965 $893 $893 $893 $893 $893 $893 $893 $893 $11,345 $11,345 5337 - State of Good Repair $130,176 $37,939 $37,939 $38,698 $38,698 $39,472 $39,472 $39,472 $39,472 $37,335 $37,335 $323,092 $323,092
FEDERAL TRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program $13,417 $4,974 $4,974 $5,073 $5,073 $5,175 $5,175 $5,175 $5,175 $5,175 $5,175 $38,987 $38,987 Other $93,839 $160 $160 $93,999 $93,999 Federal Transit Total $1,059,820 $164,370 $164,370 $211,794 $211,794 $214,013 $214,013 $214,013 $214,013 $703,151 $703,151 $2,567,161 $2,567,161 Bridge Discretionary Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) $340,091 $32,148 $47,148 $27,721 $12,721 $33,531 $33,531 $34,057 $34,223 $7,373 $21,269 $474,921 $488,982 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) $192,381 $45,000 $192,381 $237,381 Corridor Infrastructure Improvement Program (SAFETEA-LU Sec. 1302) High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo $113,889 $5,841 $5,841 $1,000 $1,000 $120,731 $120,731 High Risk Rural Road (HRRR) Highway Bridge Program (HBP) $43,955 $6,396 $6,396 $7,818 $7,818 $3,630 $3,630 $22,159 $22,159 $296,847 $296,847 $380,804 $380,804 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $1,930 $5,155 $5,155 $3,842 $3,842 $12,583 $12,583 $13,231 $13,231 $36,740 $36,740 Recreational Trails
FEDERAL HIGHWAY Safe Routes to School (SRTS) (SAFETEA-LU) Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $432,594 $39,156 $39,156 $41,522 $41,522 $43,072 $43,072 $27,251 $16,289 $570,405 $572,634 Other $248,299 $4,752 $3,667 $1,800 $1,800 $1,700 $1,700 $9 $9 $256,560 $255,474 Federal Highway Total $1,373,139 $93,449 $152,364 $83,703 $68,703 $94,515 $94,515 $96,697 $85,901 $304,229 $318,125 $2,032,542 $2,092,746 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) $26,479 $26,479 $26,479 Other FRA Federal Railroad Administration Total $26,479 $26,479 $26,479
Federal Total $2,459,438 $257,820 $316,734 $295,496 $280,496 $308,528 $308,528 $310,710 $299,914 $1,007,380 $1,021,276 $4,626,182 $4,686,386 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 INN TIVE OVA FINA Innovative Financing Total $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 PROGRAM TOTAL $7,632,841 $1,245,980 $1,302,637 $1,278,734 $1,281,861 $1,672,961 $1,599,845 $1,209,316 $1,093,832 $2,428,458 $2,347,731 $15,472,834 $15,258,746
58 Table 2c: Revenues versus Program San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (in $000s)
Prior Y 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 TOTAL Funding Source Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current
Local Total $27,516 $27,530 $22,954 $24,628 $17,210 $18,261 $5,734 $7,209 $11,609 $13,499 $85,022 $91,126 LOCAL State Highway Operations and Protection Program SHOPP (Including Augmentation) SHOPP Prior State Minor Program State Transportation Improvement Program STIP (Including Augmentation) Transportation Enhancement STIP Prior Proposition 1 A Proposition 1 B STATE GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) Highway Maintenance (HM) Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) Safe Routes to School (SR2S) State Emergency Repair Program Other State Total 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program $735 $735 $749 $749 $749 $749 $2,853 $2,853 $5,086 $5,086 5308 - Clean Fuel Formula Program 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Elderly & Persons with Disabilities Formula Program 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program 5337 - State of Good Repair $2,137 $2,137 $2,137 $2,137
FEDERAL TRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program Other Federal Transit Total $735 $735 $749 $749 $749 $749 $4,990 $4,990 $7,223 $7,223 Bridge Discretionary Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) $165 $26,850 $12,954 $27,016 $12,954 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) Corridor Infrastructure Improvement Program (SAFETEA-LU Sec. 1302) High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo High Risk Rural Road (HRRR) Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Recreational Trails
FEDERAL HIGHWAY Safe Routes to School (SRTS) (SAFETEA-LU) Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $17,611 $28,573 $44,862 $44,862 $62,473 $73,435 Other Federal Highway Total $17,777 $28,573 $71,712 $57,816 $89,489 $86,389 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA)
FRA Other Federal Railroad Administration Total Federal Total $735 $735 $749 $749 $18,525 $29,322 $76,703 $62,807 $96,712 $93,613 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) INN TIVE TIVE OVA FINA Innovative Financing Total REVENUES - PROGRAM TOTAL $27,516 $27,530 $23,690 $25,363 $17,959 $19,009 $24,260 $36,531 $88,311 $76,306 $181,735 $184,739 59 AGENDA ITEM NO. 17-10-5 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OCTOBER 20, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED: RECOMMEND
2019 SAN DIEGO FORWARD: THE REGIONAL PLAN – File Number 3102000 PROPOSED REVENUE CONSTRAINED NETWORK SCENARIOS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Introduction Recommendation
SANDAG currently is updating San Diego Forward: The Transportation Committee is asked to The Regional Plan (Regional Plan). At its October 6, recommend that the Board of Directors 2017, meeting, the Transportation Committee accept the proposed process to develop reviewed the Draft Unconstrained Transportation the Revenue Constrained Network Network and requested additional discussion on the Scenarios for use in the development of process to develop the Revenue Constrained Network 2019 San Diego Forward: The Regional Scenarios and the lists of ranked projects from the Plan, including the existing Unconstrained 2015 Regional Plan. This report includes those ranked Transportation Network, project project lists and feedback received from the Regional evaluation criteria, and project rankings Planning Committee on this item at its October 6, 2017, from the 2015 Regional Plan. meeting.
Discussion
The Draft Unconstrained Transportation Network identifies the region’s needs for transit, highway, active transportation, goods movement, arterial improvements, and operations to meet travel demand through 2050. Although not required by state or federal regulations, SANDAG utilizes project evaluation criteria to rank transportation projects in the Unconstrained Transportation Network by mode. These rankings then are used to help form various Revenue Constrained Transportation Network Scenarios.
The Revenue Constrained Transportation Network Scenarios serve as options for the Board of Directors to consider for use in the Regional Plan. Each Revenue Constrained Transportation Network Scenario provides a different combination of projects and programs (i.e., transit, highway, rail, active transportation) that could be implemented with the revenues that are reasonably expected through 2050. Once the scenarios are developed, network performance measures are used to evaluate the various combinations. Based on the findings of this evaluation, the Board selects a Preferred Transportation Scenario, which is the final mix of projects and programs that will be used as the basis of the Regional Plan.
The following flowchart visually depicts the network development process beginning with the Unconstrained Transportation Network, followed by Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios, and culminating with the Preferred Revenue Constrained Transportation Network.
Proposed Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios Development Process
Project Evaluation Criteria
It is recommended that the 2019 Regional Plan use the existing evaluation criteria and start with the current list of ranked projects to begin the complex Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios development process. Attachment 1 includes the lists of ranked projects by mode from the 2015 Regional Plan. This approach would allow the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees and Board of Directors more time to determine what the appropriate mix of projects by mode and location should be for the Regional Plan.
The existing evaluation criteria was developed for the 2015 Regional Plan and incorporated substantial changes in travel demand modeling tools, and the new vision, goals, and policy objectives framework established by the Board of Directors. An extensive effort was conducted to develop the project evaluation criteria with input from the Active Transportation Working Group, Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee, community-based organization partners, Freight Stakeholders Working Group, Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee, Public Health Stakeholders Working Group, Regional Planning Technical Working Group, and the Tribal Transportation Working Group. Input also was sought from partner agencies including Caltrans, the Metropolitan Transit System, the North County Transit District, and at the Regional Plan workshops held throughout the region. Additionally, a peer review panel was convened to review and assess the criteria, and to consider feedback and input that was incorporated into the criteria. The panelists, which included experts from academia, other Metropolitan Planning Organizations, and the private sector, provided recommendations for revision and enhancement to the draft criteria.
2 Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios
There are many new themes to consider in the development of the Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios, including the incorporation of new transportation technologies, considerations from the TransNet Ten-Year Review (as required by the TransNet Ordinance), and the need to meet potentially more stringent greenhouse gas emission reduction targets currently being updated by the California Air Resources Board. Overall network efficiency, project readiness, and funding availability also will continue to guide the development of the scenarios. In addition, all Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios would be designed to support local land uses as reflected in local land use plans. Of all of the required steps in the Regional Plan process that the Board directs, determining the mix of projects and modes, and assessing the performance of each combination has the most impact on what the final 2019 Regional Plan will look like.
Network Performance Measures
Again, while the project evaluation criteria exclusively are used to rank individual projects by mode, the network performance measures are used to evaluate each Revenue Constrained Network Scenario as a whole. Informed by the Board’s vision and goals, the performance measures can help provide a “scorecard” to compare the different Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios. The Policy Advisory Committees and Board of Directors will be asked to provide feedback on updating the performance measures for the 2019 Regional Plan in the coming months. In addition, feedback will be gathered from SANDAG working groups, the network of community-based organizations, the public, potential peer group review, Policy Advisory Committees, and the Board of Directors.
The network performance measures will align with the performance monitoring measures now required by the federal Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act. This act established a new performance and outcome-based program, which includes national performance goals for the federal-aid highway program in the following areas: safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, and environmental sustainability.
Transportation Committee Feedback
At its meeting on October 6, 2017, the Transportation Committee discussed the Draft Unconstrained Transportation Network and proposed process to develop Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios for the 2019 Regional Plan. No revisions were requested to the Draft Unconstrained Transportation Network. The committee requested more time to discuss the 2015 Regional Plan project evaluation criteria and rankings, which subsequently were emailed to all committee members. Additionally, feedback from the Transportation Committee members included a request to add vehicle miles traveled to the performance measures (when developed) and to update the draft unconstrained maps when presented to the Board to reflect projects that have been completed or are under development since adoption of 2015 Regional Plan
3 Regional Planning Committee Feedback
At its meeting on October 6, 2017, the Regional Planning Committee also discussed this item and requested the 2015 Regional Plan project rankings, which staff subsequently emailed to all committee members.
The Regional Planning Committee supported moving forward with the draft Unconstrained Transportation Network and using the 2015 Regional Plan ranked project lists in the 2019 Regional Plan development proces, in order to devote more time for the Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios development process. Members cited the need to better understand the impacts of major emerging transportation opportunities (such as autonomous vehicles, ridesourcing companies such as Uber and Lyft, and electric vehicles) and to focus their energy on identifying different, and more diverse, options for the Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios.
In terms of performance measures, members requested consideration of travel times, vehicle miles traveled, cost-effectiveness, the relationship of solo driving and capacity for freight movements, as well as aligning the mode share analysis with local Cimate Action Plan mode share goals.
Next Steps
Pending recommendation by the Transportation Committee and action by the Board of Directors, staff would begin updating the performance measures over the next several months, concurrent with the development of the Emerging Transportation Technologies white paper. Draft performance measures would be brought to the Policy Advisory Committees in early 2018 and include input from SANDAG working groups and the public. Additionally, the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees will be asked to provide input and direction into the revenue estimates that will be used to develop the funding capacity for Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios.
CHARLES “MUGGS” STOLL Director of Land Use and Transportation Planning
Attachment: 1. 2015 Regional Plan: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings (Appendix M)
Key Staff Contact: Phil Trom, (619) 699-7330, [email protected]
4 Attachment 1
Appendix M Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings
Appendix Contents Introduction Background Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria Development Process Highway Corridors T ransit Services Active Transportation Managed Lane Connectors Freeway-to-Freeway Connectors Rail Grade Separations Regional Arterial System Federal Guidance
5 Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings
Introduction This Appendix describes the process for developing evaluation criteria for prioritizing highway, Managed Lanes and Managed Lane connectors, freeway connectors, transit service, active transportation, and rail grade separation projects for inclusion in the Preferred Revenue Constrained Transportation Scenario of San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. This Appendix also includes information on the screening criteria for the regional arterial system.
In past Regional Transportation Plans (RTP), SANDAG utilized transportation project evaluation criteria informed by the plan goals as elements of a multistep process to prioritize and evaluate transportation projects in the development of the preferred revenue constrained transportation network. For the Regional Plan, an extensive update effort was undertaken, which included a comprehensive review of the 2050 RTP criteria, efforts to streamline the criteria, incorporate new goals and policy objectives, and input from the public and a peer review panel.
The Board of Directors approved the transportation project evaluation criteria at its October 11, 2013, meeting. Project evaluation criteria were applied to each modal category of projects in the Unconstrained Transportation Network.
Background Vision and goals In early 2013, the Board of Directors provided input to frame questions for a statistically significant telephone survey intended to gauge public opinion and to inform the development of the vision and goals as the policy foundation for the Regional Plan. Based on the results of the telephone survey, the broad categories with the most support, in order of overall preference, included:
• Improving the regional economy, business climate, and local job opportunities
• Maintaining what we’ve built, including streets, highways, and public facilities
• Protecting the environment, reducing air pollution, and making better use of renewable energy sources
• Improving the transportation system to improve the flow of people and goods
• Locating future housing and new businesses near major employment centers and transit services to reduce commute times and traffic congestion
After discussion of the survey results, the Board crafted the vision and three goals for the plan: (1) Innovative Mobility and Planning, (2) Healthy Environment and Communities, and (3) Vibrant Economy. The Board of Directors accepted the vision and goals for the San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan on May 10, 2013. The vision and goals guide all elements of the Regional Plan, including the project evaluation criteria.
Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria Development Process Using the evaluation criteria from the 2050 RTP and Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as a starting point, staff initiated the review and refinement of the transportation project evaluation criteria for San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan in February 2013. A consultant team with strong technical expertise assisted in the development of the draft criteria. Revisions to the criteria and methodologies were made to align them with the vision and goals accepted for the Regional Plan and to take advantage of the enhanced modeling tool: the Activity Based Model. 6 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 1 Transportation project evaluation criteria The project evaluation criteria for San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan is organized within the three goals established by the Board: (1) Innovative Mobility and Planning, (2) Healthy Environment and Communities, and (3) Vibrant Economy. Each individual criterion is nested into one of the three goals. The Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria are included in Tables M.1, M.3, M.5, M.7, M.9, and M.11.
The refinements that were incorporated into the project evaluation criteria for the Regional Plan can be organized into three broad areas: (1) model enhancement-related, (2) new criteria, and (3) reorganized criteria. The majority of proposed changes to the criteria have resulted from newer capabilities of the model enhancements, which allow greater analysis of household travel. Project evaluation criteria that have benefited from model enhancements include: provides congestion relief, serves daily trips, facilitates FasTrak®/carpool/transit, pedestrian and bike mobility, serves Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) Smart Growth areas, provides accessibility, serves goods movement, and project cost-effectiveness. Other new modal criteria are incorporated, including physical activity, and access to schools, recreational areas, and beaches.
Active transportation criteria were also included as a modal category for the first time in the Regional Plan and were developed through similar combined efforts with local jurisdictions, partner agencies, SANDAG working groups, other stakeholders, consultants, and the general public. The majority of the criteria are consistent with other modal categories, including serves daily trips, safety, greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions, serves RCP Smart Growth areas, physical activity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, greenhouse gas reductions, disadvantaged communities1 served by the project, and cost-effectiveness criteria were added to the rail grade separation category to provide greater consistency of analysis across modal categories.
SANDAG has been developing active transportation enhancements to the Activity-based Model (ABM). The Active Transportation criteria were intended to be used with the active transportation-enhanced ABM. However, these enhancements were not completed in time to be used in application of the Active Transportation criteria, so the project rankings from Riding to 2050: The San Diego Regional Bike Plan was utilized.
Cost-effectiveness and jobs criterion A more comprehensive cost-effectiveness and jobs criterion was included that builds upon the 2050 RTP/SCS method, which evaluated the person hours saved or ridership of the project relative to its capital costs and operating and maintenance costs. For the Regional Plan, the cost-effectiveness criterion monetized a number of factors such as fuel costs, greenhouse gas emissions, smog-forming pollutants, physical activity, travel time savings, safety, and the value of jobs created by the project, which were compared to the capital, operating, and maintenance cost of the project. While analyses such as the project cost-effectiveness criterion attempt to capture the economic effects of the projects as comprehensively as possible, such analyses may not fully reflect the importance of individual factors to the project prioritization process. As a result, some components of the project cost-effectiveness criterion also are reflected in other evaluation criteria to capture the relative importance of these factors.
Public outreach SANDAG received input on the project evaluation criteria from regional stakeholders at meetings of the Active Transportation Working Group, Cities and County Technical Advisory Committee, community-based organization partners, Freight Stakeholders Working Group, Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC), Public Health Stakeholders Working Group, Regional Planning Technical Working Group, and the Tribal Transportation Working Group. Staff also sought input from other partner agencies including Caltrans, the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), and the North County Transit District (NCTD). Input on the prioritization of transportation projects also was solicited from the public at the San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan workshops held throughout the region and at Caltrans 7 2 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan in June 2013. In addition to the workshop series, a public workshop was held on August 5, 2013, with more than 75 participants. More than 400 comments were collected from local jurisdictions, partner agencies, stakeholders, and the general public. This feedback provided valuable information that was considered in development of the final project evaluation criteria.
Peer review A five-person peer review panel was created to review and assess the criteria, and to consider feedback and input that was proposed to be incorporated into the criteria. Panelists included staff from the San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission in Oakland, California and the Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle, Washington. Experts from academia and the private sector included: Jennifer Dill, Professor, Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning Director; Oregon Transportation Research & Education Consortium; Portland State University; Marty Wachs, Senior Principal Researcher at RAND, Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Urban Planning, University of California Los Angeles Luskin School of Public Affairs; and Joel Freedman, Manager, Systems Analysis Technical Resource Center, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Based on the panel’s review and comments received from working groups and the public, several refinements were made to the initial draft criteria. Additionally, individual criterion weightings were adjusted to provide greater consistency of common measures across modal categories.
Project evaluation criteria weightings The project evaluation criteria weighting allocates roughly one-third of the total possible points for each of the goal focus areas. These proposed weightings reflect the highest regional priority areas, which are nested in the goals.
All mode categories have a 100-point scale, with each individual criterion allocated a specified maximum score. Feedback from the ITOC, as well as other SANDAG working group members, stakeholders, and the general public, was considered during the development of the proposed criteria weightings. As a result, additional weight was given to the greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions and cost-effectiveness criteria in the active transportation evaluation criteria, providing greater consistency with weighting of these criteria across modes.
Highway Corridors SANDAG has used criteria for evaluating and ranking highway corridor projects since 1997. Using the 2050 RTP criteria as a starting point, a set of revised criteria which reflect the Board-adopted goals were developed.
The eleven highway evaluation criteria presented in Table M.1 quantify congestion relief, project safety, provides access to evacuation routes, facilitates FasTrak/carpool/transit, pedestrian and bike mobility, minimizes habitat and residential impacts, greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions, serves RCP smart growth areas, physical activity, accessibility, serves goods movement and relieves freight system bottlenecks/capacity constraints, and project cost- effectiveness. The approved highway criteria incorporates a number of refined or new elements including the daily person hours saved for disadvantaged communities; reduction in smog forming pollutants; increase in physical activity; and an expanded accessibility measure which quantifies access to jobs, schools, and recreation.
The highway network corridor evaluation was used to develop the Revenue Constrained Network alternatives and project phasing included in the Regional Plan. The 37 unconstrained highway corridors evaluated for the 2050 Regional Plan are listed in priority order in Table M.2.
The prioritized list of highway projects was used as a tool in assembling logical transportation networks of highway projects that complement transit and arterial projects. Priority order is not necessarily strictly followed. Rather, emphasis is placed upon developing meaningful networks in accordance with the Regional Plan goals and objectives. 8 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 3 Table M.1 Project Evaluation Criteria Highway Corridors
No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Max Total Policy Objectives Score Percent
Innovative Mobility & Planning
1 Provides Congestion A) What is the number of daily Change in daily person-hours 10 35 Mobility Choices Relief person-hours saved from saved implementing the project?*
B) What is the number of daily Change in daily person-hours 5 person-hours saved for saved for disadvantaged disadvantaged communities? communities population
2 Project Safety How does the project compare Project percentage of collisions 5 Preservation and Safety of the against the statewide average for measured against statewide Transportation System collisions?* average
3 Provides Access to How will the project provide Proximity analysis of hazard areas 5 Preservation and Safety of the Evacuation Routes evacuation access for regional (dam failure, earthquake, flood, Transportation System, Partnerships hazard areas? landslide, liquefaction, tsunami, and Collaboration, Binational and wildfire), weighted by Collaboration with Baja California population and employment
4 Facilitates FasTrak/ How will the project facilitate Projects will receive points if they 10 Mobility Choices, Complete Carpool/Transit, FasTrak/carpool/Managed Lane include FasTrak/carpool/Managed Communities Pedestrian and Bike facilities and/or regional or corridor Lane facility, and/or regional or Mobility transit services and/or pedestrian corridor transit services, and/or and bike access? pedestrian and bike facilities, which is then weighted by combined carpool person volume + transit person volume
4 9 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.1 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Highway Corridors
Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Policy Objectives Score Percent
Healthy Environment & Communities
5 Minimizes Habitat and How will the project minimize Proximity analysis of preserve 5 30 Habitat and Open Space Residential Impacts negative habitat and residential areas, native habitats, and housing Preservation, Environmental impacts?* (more than two dwelling units per Stewardship acre)
6 Greenhouse gas and A) What is the reduction in CO2 Reduction in CO2 emissions 5 Environmental Stewardship, Energy Pollutant Emissions emissions from implementing the and Climate Change Mitigation and project?* Adaptation
B) What is the reduction in smog Reduction in smog-forming 5 forming pollutants from pollutants implementing the project?*
7 Serves RCP Smart What is the share of trips on the Share of trips on facility serving 10 Complete Communities, Regional Growth Areas facility serving RCP Smart Growth existing/planned or potential Economic Prosperity, Habitat and Areas (Metropolitan Center, Urban Metropolitan Center, Urban Open Space Preservation Center, and Special Use Center)?* Center, and Special Use Center is calculated, using select link analysis
8 Physical Activity What is the increase in physical Increase in time engaged in 5 Mobility Choices, Complete activity? moderate transportation-related Communities physical activity
Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 10 5 Table M.1 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Highway Corridors Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Policy Objectives Score Percent Vibrant Economy
9 Accessibility A) What is the improved access to Weighted average number of jobs 4 35 Mobility Choices, Regional jobs and schools? and school enrollment accessible in Economic Prosperity 30 minutes by auto
B) How will the project support Acres of parkland/recreational 4 Complete Communities, Habitat access to recreational areas and areas and beaches within 1/4 mile and Open Space Preservation beaches? of project
C) What percentage of users of the Select link used to determine 2 Mobility Choices, Partnerships and project access Indian reservations? origins and destinations served, Collaboration total trips to/from Indian reservation areas
10 Serves Goods What is the improved average Total travel time savings for 5 Mobility Choices, Regional Movement and Relieves travel time for freight?* medium and heavy truck classes Economic Prosperity, Binational Freight System Collaboration with Baja California Bottlenecks/ Capacity Constraints
11 Project Cost- What is the cost-effectiveness of Enhanced cost-effectiveness 20 Mobility Choices, Regional Effectiveness the project?* measure incorporates the Economic Prosperity, Complete following components: Communities, Binational - Project cost Collaboration with Baja California, - Generalized delay costs Preservation and Safety of the - Fuel costs Transportation System, - greenhouse gas emissions Environmental Stewardship, Energy - Smog-forming pollutants and Climate Change Mitigation and - Physical activity Adaptation - Safety * Provides dual evaluation for both passenger vehicles and trucks.
6 11 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.2 Highway Corridor Project Rankings TransNet , Early Freeway/ Unconstrained Cost Total Regional Plan Action Program From To Existing With Improvements Highway ($2014) (millions) Score Project Rank (EAP) EAP (Env) I-5 La Jolla Village Dr Vandegrift 8F/10F+2HOV 8F/10F+4ML $3,045.2 57.7 1
EAP (Transit/Env) I-805 SR 905 Carroll Canyon Rd 8F+2HOV 8F+2ML/8F+4ML $3,419.0 54.1 2
TransNet SR 78 I-5 I-15 6F 6F+2ML/Operational $959.5 51.4 3
TransNet I-5 SR 905 SR 15 8F 8F/10F+2HOV $651.5 45.2 4
n/a SR 15 SR 94 I-805 6F 6F+2HOV $30.3 45.0 5
TransNet SR 54 I-5 SR 125 6F 6F/8F+2HOV $232.3 37.2 6
TransNet I-5 I-8 La Jolla Village Dr 8F/10F 8F/10F+2HOV $555.5 36.7 7
TransNet I-5 SR 15 I-8 8F 8F+Operational $1,176.7 33.2 8
EAP (Transit) I-15 I-8 SR 163 8F 8F+2HOV $55.6 31.6 9
EAP (Transit) SR 94 I-5 I-805 8F 8F+2HOV $484.8 31.3 10
n/a I-8 Los Coches Dunbar Rd 4F/6F 6F $131.3 30.5 11
TransNet SR 94 I-805 SR 125 8F 8F/10F+2ML $469.7 30.5 11
n/a SR 76 I-15 Couser Canyon 2C 4C/6C+Operational $131.3 29.8 13
TransNet I-8 2nd St Los Coches 4F/6F 6F $35.4 29.2 14
TransNet SR 125 SR 54 SR 94 6F 8F+2HOV $146.5 29.2 14
n/a SR 125 SR 94 I-8 8F 10F+2HOV $292.9 29.1 16
n/a I-8 SR 125 2nd St 6F/8F 6F/8F+Operational $166.7 28.9 17
n/a I-15 Viaduct 8F 8F+2HOV $843.4 28.1 18
TransNet SR 94 SR 125 Avocado Blvd 4F 6F $111.1 27.5 19
n/a SR 52 I-5 I-805 4F 6F $111.1 26.5 20
Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 12 7 Table M.2 (continued) Highway Corridor Project Rankings TransNet , Early Freeway/ Unconstrained Cost Total Regional Plan Action Program From To Existing With Improvements Highway ($2014) (millions) Score Project Rank (EAP) n/a SR 15 I-5 SR 94 6F 8F+2HOV $136.4 26.3 21
n/a SR 163 I-805 I-15 8F 8F+2HOV $333.3 25.9 22
n/a SR 52 SR 125 SR 67 4F 6F $252.5 25.8 23
n/a SR 125 SR 905 SR 54 4F 8F $232.3 25.2 24
n/a SR 76 Couser Canyon SR 79 2C 2C+Operational $632.8 25.1 25
n/a SR 125 I-8 SR 52 6F 6F+2HOV $262.6 24.8 26
TransNet SR 94 Avocado Blvd Melody Ln 4C/2C 6C/2C+Operational $419.2 24.2 27
n/a SR 905 I-5 I-805 4F 8F $156.6 23.6 28
TransNet SR 56 I-5 I-15 4F 6F+2HOV $303.0 23.4 29
n/a SR 15 Lake Hodges SR 78 8F/10F 10F $232.3 21.7 30
TransNet SR 67 Mapleview St Dye Rd 2C/4C 4C $575.7 21.1 31
n/a I-8 I-5 SR 125 8F/10F 8F/10F+Operational $666.6 20.7 32
n/a SR 76 I-5 Melrose Dr 4E 6E $232.3 20.6 33
n/a SR 52 I-805 I-15 6F 6F+2HOV $90.9 20.2 34
n/a SR 67 I-8 Mapleview St 4F/6F 6F/8F $141.4 19.2 35
TransNet (2ML(R)) SR 52 I-15 SR 125 4F/6F 6F+3ML(R) $454.5 14.5 36
n/a SR 905 I-805 Mexico 6F 8F $202.0 13.5 37
Table M.2 Legend C = Conventional Highway Lanes ML = Managed Lanes F = Freeway Lanes ML(R) = Managed Lanes (Reversible) HOV = High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes T = Toll Lanes
8 13 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Transit Services With key input from MTS and NCTD staff, updated criteria was created to prioritize transit service projects. The transit services category incorporates several new or refined criteria which includes providing access to evacuation routes, an expanded accessibility criterion which quantifies access to jobs, schools, and amenities, as well as the percentage of disadvantaged community users, and an expanded project cost-effectiveness criterion. Table M.3 includes the detailed criteria and weighting for prioritizing transit service projects. The 51 unconstrained transit routes evaluated for the Regional Plan are listed in priority order in Table M.4.
14 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings Table M.3 Project Evaluation Criteria Transit Services
Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Innovative Mobility & Planning
1 Provides Time Competitive/ Reliable What is the percentage of the Analysis of percentage of transit 10 35 Mobility Choices, Transit Service route located in priority route within dedicated transit Complete Communities treatment? guideway; dedicated arterial lane, interrupted rail, or Managed Lane; or HOV lane or arterial spot treatment
2 Serves Daily Trips What is the number of Change in daily transit linked trips 15 Mobility Choices, additional daily transit trips Complete Communities resulting from the project?
3 Provides Access to Evacuation Routes How will the project provide Proximity analysis of hazard areas 5 Mobility Choices, evacuation access for regional (dam failure, earthquake, flood, Partnerships and hazards? landslide, liquefaction, tsunami, and Collaboration, wildfire), weighted by population Binational and employment Collaboration with Baja California, Preservation and Safety of the Transportation System
4 Daily System Utilization What is the daily transit Daily passenger miles/ daily service 5 Mobility Choices, utilization? seat miles (system wide) Complete Communities
15 10 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.3 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Transit Services
Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Healthy Environment & Communities
5 greenhouse gas and Pollutant A) What is the reduction in Reduction in CO2 emissions 5 30 Environmental
Emissions CO2 emissions from Stewardship, Energy implementing the project? and Climate Change Mitigation and B) What is the reduction in Reduction in smog forming 5 Adaptation smog forming pollutants from pollutants implementing the project?
6 Serves RCP Smart Growth Areas What is the share of trips on Share of trips on transit service 10 Complete the transit service serving RCP serving all existing/planned or Communities, Regional Smart Growth areas? potential Smart Growth Areas is Economic Prosperity, calculated, using select link analysis Habitat and Open Space Preservation
7 Physical Activity What is the increase in Increase in time engaged in 10 Mobility Choices, physical activity? moderate transportation-related Complete Communities physical activity
Vibrant Economy
8 Accessibility A) What is the increase in job Change in daily transit linked work 4 35 Mobility Choices, and school trips by transit? and school trips Regional Economic Prosperity
B) How will the project support Acres of parkland/ recreational areas 3 Complete Communities, access to recreational areas and and beaches within 1/4 mile of Habitat and Open Space beaches? project Preservation
16 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 11 Table M.3 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Transit Services
Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Vibrant Economy (continued)
C) What is the increase in transit Change in total transit trips by 3 Mobility Choices, trips by disadvantaged disadvantaged communities Partnerships and communities? population Collaboration
D) How will the project facilitate Project located within 1/4 mile of 3 Mobility Choices, pedestrian and bike access? pedestrian and bike facilities Complete Communities
E) What is the increase in transit Change in total transit trips to/from 2 Mobility Choices, trips to federally recognized Indian reservations Partnerships and Indian reservations? Collaboration
9 Project Cost-Effectiveness What is the cost-effectiveness of Enhanced cost-effectiveness measure 20 Mobility Choices, the project? incorporates the following Regional Economic components: Prosperity, Binational Collaboration with Baja - Project cost California, Preservation - Fuel costs and Safety of the - greenhouse gas emissions Transportation System, - Smog forming pollutants Environmental - Physical activity Stewardship, Energy and - Safety Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
17 12 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.4 Transit Service Project Rankings
TransNet / Unconstrained Regional Total Early Action Service Route Project Description Cost ($2014) Plan Project Score Program (millions) Rank (EAP)
Trolley 562 Carmel Valley to San Ysidro via Kearny $2,632.5 95.9 1 Mesa
Trolley 550 SDSU to Palomar Station via East $1,581.5 65.2 2 San Diego, SE San Diego, National City
Trolley 560 SDSU to Downtown via El Cajon $2,389.9 64.5 3 Blvd/Mid-City (transition of Mid-City Rapid to LRT)
TransNet/ COASTER 398 Double Tracking (includes all COASTER $2,901.6 63.7 4 EAP improvements, positive train control, extension to National City, and Camp Pendleton)
Trolley 563 Pacific Beach to El Cajon Transit Center $1,297.7 61.9 5 via Kearny Mesa, Mission Valley, SDSU
BRT 650 Chula Vista to Palomar Airport Rd $81.9 51.6 6 Business Park via I-805/I-5 (peak only)
TransNet SPRINTER 399 Double Tracking (includes all SPRINTER $945.5 51.5 7 improvements and extension to South Escondido)
Rapid 28 Point Loma to Kearny Mesa via Old $49.8 49.4 8 Town, Linda Vista
Rapid 103 Solana Beach to Sabre Springs BRT $66.8 47.4 9 station via Carmel Valley
Rapid 10 La Mesa to Ocean Beach via Mid-City, $87.7 44.9 10 Hillcrest, Old Town
Trolley 561 UTC to Mira Mesa via Sorrento $1,167.4 42.1 11 Mesa/Carroll Cyn (extension of route 510). Includes connection with COASTER at Scranton Rd
TransNet BRT 680 Otay Mesa/San Ysidro to Sorrento $457.9 42.0 12 and Mesa via I-805 Corridor, Otay 688/ Ranch/Millenia, National City, 689 Southeastern San Diego, Mid-City, Kearny Mesa
18 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 13 Table M.4 (continued) Transit Service Project Rankings
TransNet/ Unconstrained Regional Total Early Action Service Route Project Description Cost ($2014) Plan Project Score Program (millions) Rank (EAP)
Trolley 522 Orange Line Express - El Cajon to $197.2 41.6 13 ITC/Airport
Rapid 30 Old Town to Sorrento Mesa via Pacific $104.9 40.6 14 Beach, La Jolla, UTC
Trolley 564 Otay Mesa East Border Crossing to $1,000.7 40.5 15 Western Chula Vista via Otay Ranch/Millenia
Rapid 41 Fashion Valley to VA Hospital via $55.4 40.2 16 SR 163, Genesee, La Jolla Village Dr
BRT 940 Oceanside to Sorrento Mesa via I-5, $39.0 40.0 17 Carlsbad, Encinitas (peak only)
Rapid 473 Oceanside TC to UC San Diego via $129.7 38.4 18 Pacific Hwy, Del Mar Heights, El Camino Real and UTC
Trolley 540 Blue Line Express - Santa Fe Depot to $390.6 38.3 19 San Ysidro via Downtown
Rapid 2 North Park to Downtown San Diego via $38.9 35.6 20 30th St / Broadway
Trolley 566 Palomar St Trolley Station to UTC via $334.9 35.5 21 Mid-City, Kearny Mesa (Route 562 Express)
Rapid 477 East Camp Pendleton to Carlsbad $80.0 33.7 22 Village via Vandergrift, College Blvd, Plaza Camino Real
BRT 430 Oceanside to Escondido via SR 78 $239.6 33.3 23
Rapid 910 Coronado to Downtown via Coronado $25.7 31.9 24 Bridge
Rapid 11 Spring Valley to SDSU via SE $113.2 31.5 25 San Diego, Downtown, Hillcrest, Mid- City
BRT 905 Iris Trolley Station to East Otay Mesa $0.00 30.6 26 via Otay Mesa
19 14 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.4 (continued) Transit Service Project Rankings
TransNet/ Unconstrained Regional Total Early Action Service Route Project Description Cost ($2014) Plan Project Score Program (millions) Rank (EAP)
Streetcar 553 Downtown San Diego: Little Italy to $139.4 30.6 26 East Village
Streetcar 554 Hillcrest/Balboa Park/Downtown $285.2 30.3 28 San Diego Loop
Rapid 440 Carlsbad Pointsettia to Escondido TC to $51.3 30.3 28 UC San Diego via Palomar Airport Rd, San Marcos Blvd, Mission Rd
SPRINTER 588 SPRINTER Express. Escondido Transit $243.9 30.2 30 Center - Oceanside Transit Center
BRT 652 Downtown to UTC via Kearny Mesa $2.8 29.7 31 Guideway/I-805
BRT 653 Mid-City to Palomar Airport Rd via $10.5 29.4 32 Kearny Mesa/I-805/I-5
Streetcar 565 Mission Beach to La Jolla via Pacific $246.0 29.0 33 Beach
Rapid 709 H St Trolley to Millenia via H St $37.0 28.2 34 Corridor, Southwestern College
Streetcar 555 30th St to Downtown San Diego via $256.1 28.1 35 North Park/Golden Hill
Rapid 120 Kearny Mesa to Downtown via $77.9 27.9 36 SR 163/Fashion Valley. No guideway.
Rapid 635 Eastlake/EUC to Palomar Trolley Station $55.3 27.4 37 via Main St Corridor
Streetcar 557 El Cajon Downtown $164.5 26.7 38
Rapid 639 Iris Trolley Station to North Island via $54.2 26.2 39 Imperial Beach and Silver Strand, Coronado
Rapid 636 SDSU to Spring Valley via East $39.5 25.1 40 San Diego, Lemon Grove, Skyline
Rapid 637 North Park to 32nd St Trolley via $32.6 24.9 41 Golden Hill
20 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 15 Table M.4 (continued) Transit Service Project Rankings
TransNet/ Unconstrained Regional Total Early Action Service Route Project Description Cost ($2014) Plan Project Score Program (millions) Rank (EAP)
BRT 870 El Cajon to Campus Point via Santee, $7.7 24.4 42 SR 52, I-805
Rapid 471 Downtown Escondido to East $31.7 24.3 43 Escondido
Rapid 474 Oceanside to Vista via Mission $50.4 23.8 44 Ave/Santa Fe Rd Corridor
BRT 692 Grossmont Center to Otay Town $4.5 23.4 45 Center/Millenia via Southwest College, SR 125, Spring Valley
BRT 890 El Cajon to Sorrento Mesa via SR 52, $12.7 23.1 46 Kearny Mesa
Streetcar 551 Chula Vista Downtown $137.8 22.5 47
Streetcar 558 Escondido Downtown $51.2 22.4 48
Rapid 638 Iris Trolley to Otay Mesa via Otay, $38.2 21.6 49 SR 905 Corridor
Streetcar 559 Oceanside Downtown $45.7 21.4 50
Streetcar 552 National City Downtown $41.2 21.3 51
Active Transportation For the first time, active transportation criteria were developed. These criteria were developed through similar combined efforts with local jurisdictions, partner agencies, SANDAG working groups, other stakeholders, consultants, and the general public. The majority of the active transportation evaluation criteria is consistent with other modal categories, including and pollutant emissions and serves RCP smart growth areas. SANDAG has been developing active transportation enhancements to the Activity-based Model (ABM). The Active Transportation criteria were intended to be used with the active transportation-enhanced ABM. These enhancements were not completed in time to be used to apply the Active Transportation criteria, so the project rankings from Riding to 2050: The San Diego Regional Bike Plan were utilized. The detailed criteria developed as part of the Regional Plan effort are shown in Table M.5. A list of ranked active transportation projects can be seen in Table M.6.
21 16 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.5 Project Evaluation Criteria Active Transportation Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Innovative Mobility & Planning 1 Serves Daily Trips What is the change in the number Change in active transportation 15 35 Mobility Choices of active transportation trips? mode trips or transit accessed by active transportation mode trips
2 Project Safety Is the project located in an area Number of bike and pedestrian 5 Preservation and Safety of the with a high bike and pedestrian traffic incidents within 1/4 mile of Transportation System traffic incident rate? project
3 System Connectivity A) Does the project provide Project located within 1/4 mile of 5 Mobility Choices, Complete enhanced connectivity to/from transit, highway, or rail grade Communities transit station/stop areas, highway separation project areas project areas, or rail grade separations?
B) Does the project provide Project provides direct access to 5 multimodal connections? other transit, highway, rail grade separation, or active transportation projects
4 Consistency with local Is the improvement identified in a Project is in a locally adopted plan 5 Partnerships and Collaboration plans locally adopted plan?
22 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 17 Table M.5 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Active Transportation Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Healthy Environment & Communities 5 Reduced Bike/Pedestrian Does the project result in a safer Project area is currently unsafe for 10 35 Mobility Choices, Preservation Stress Level facility for people biking and pedestrian and bike activity due to and Safety of the Transportation pedestrians? speeds, vehicular traffic volumes, System conflict points such as freeway on/off-ramps, etc.
6 greenhouse gas and A) What is the reduction in CO2 Reduction in CO2 emissions 5 Environmental Stewardship, Pollutant Emissions emissions from implementing the Energy and Climate Change project? Mitigation and Adaptation
B) What is the reduction in smog Reduction in smog forming 5 forming pollutants from pollutants implementing the project?
7 Serves RCP Smart Growth Is the project located near Population and employment in all 5 Complete Communities, Regional Areas population and employment? smart growth areas within 1/4 Economic Prosperity, Habitat and mile distance of project Open Space Preservation
8 Physical Activity What is the increase in physical Increase in time engaged in 5 Mobility Choices, Complete activity? moderate transportation-related Communities physical activity
9 Range of Users/Skill Levels For major arterial street, are Project results in route attractive 5 Mobility Choices, Preservation Served alternative routes attractive to all to all riders and Safety of the Transportation riders considered, or are the System arterial or alternative routes traffic calmed?
23 18 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.5 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Active Transportation Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Vibrant Economy
10 Accessibility A) Does the project support access Employment and schools within 4 30 Mobility Choices, Regional to jobs and schools? 1/4 mile of project Economic Prosperity
B) Does the project support access Acres of parkland/recreational 3 Complete Communities, Habitat to recreational areas, parks, and areas and beaches within 1/4 mile and Open Space Preservation beaches? of project
C) What percentage of the project Disadvantaged communities 3 Mobility Choices, Partnerships users are from disadvantaged population within 1/4 mile of and Collaboration communities? project
11 Project Cost-Effectiveness What is the cost-effectiveness of Enhanced cost-effectiveness 20 Mobility Choices, Regional the project? measure may incorporate the Economic Prosperity, Binational following components: Collaboration with Baja California, Environmental - Project cost Stewardship, Energy and Climate - Generalized delay costs Change Mitigation and - Fuel costs Adaptation, Preservation and - greenhouse gas emissions Safety of the Transportation - Smog forming pollutants System - Health and physical activity - Safety
24 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 19 Table M.6 Regional Bike Plan Network Corridor Rankings Early Action Program (EAP)
EAP Funding Through Cost Project Jurisdiction(s) Priority Project Phase ($2014) 1 Uptown - Fashion Valley to Downtown San Diego Const. $22,889,000 San Diego 2 Uptown - Old Town to Hillcrest San Diego Const. $17,979,000
3 Uptown - Hillcrest to Balboa Park San Diego Const. $2,579,000
4 North Park - Mid-City - Hillcrest to Kensington San Diego Const. $5,727,000
5 North Park - Mid-City - Hillcrest to City Heights San Diego Const. $5,775,000 (Hillcrest-El Cajon Corridor) 6 North Park - Mid-City - City Heights San Diego Const. $2,688,000
7 North Park - Mid-City - Hillcrest to City Heights San Diego Const. $4,869,000 (City Heights - Old Town Corridor) 8 North Park - Mid-City - City Heights to Rolando San Diego Const. $4,319,000
9 San Diego River Trail - Qualcomm Stadium San Diego Const. $829,000
10 San Diego River Trail - Father Junipero Serra Trail Santee ROW $2,816,000 to Santee 11 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Rose Creek San Diego Const. $20,636,000
12 Bayshore Bikeway - Main St to Palomar Chula Vista/ Const. $2,959,000 Imperial Beach 13 Coastal Rail Trail Encinitas - Chesterfield to G Encinitas Const. $6,885,000
14 Coastal Rail Trail Encinitas - Chesterfield to Encinitas Eng. $100,000 Solana Beach 15 to Inland Rail Trail (combination of four projects) San Marcos, Const. $32,691,000 18 Vista, County of San Diego 19 Coastal Rail Trail Oceanside - Wisconsin to Oceanside Const. $200,000 Oceanside Blvd. 20 Plaza Bonita Bike Path National City Const. $400,000
21 Bayshore Bikeway - National City Marina to 32nd San Diego/ Const. $1,503,000 St National City 22 I-15 Mid-City - Adams Ave to Camino Del Rio S San Diego Const. $9,341,000
23 Bayshore Bikeway - Barrio Logan San Diego ROW $4,604,000
24 Pershing and El Prado - North Park to Downtown San Diego Const. $7,282,000 San Diego 25 Pershing and El Prado - Cross-Park San Diego Const. $613,000
26 Downtown to Southeast connections - East San Diego ROW $787,000 Village 27 Downtown to Southeast connections - San Diego ROW $3,045,000 Downtown San Diego to Encanto 25 20 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan
Table M.6 (continued) Regional Bike Plan Network Corridor Rankings Early Action Program (EAP) (continued)
EAP Funding Through Cost Project Jurisdiction(s) Priority Project Phase ($2014) 28 Downtown to Southeast connections - San Diego ROW $2,825,000 Downtown San Diego to Golden Hill 29 San Ysidro to Imperial Beach - Bayshore Bikeway Imperial Beach/ ROW $1,726,000 Connection (Border Access) San Diego 30 San Ysidro to Imperial Beach - Bayshore Bikeway Imperial Beach/ ROW $860,000 Connection (Imperial Beach Connector) San Diego 31 Terrace Dr/Central Ave - Adams to Wightman San Diego Const. $1,407,000
32 San Diego River Trail - I-805 to Fenton San Diego Const. $1,741,000
33 San Diego River Trail - Short gap connections San Diego Const. $1,370,000
34 Coastal Rail Trail Encinitas - Leucadia to G St Encinitas Const. $4,763,000
35 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - UTC San Diego ROW $791,000
36 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Rose Canyon San Diego ROW $2,508,000
37 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Pacific Hwy San Diego Const. $4,050,000 (W. Washington St to Laurel St) 38 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Pacific Hwy San Diego Const. $7,628,000 (Laurel St to Santa Fe Depot) 39 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Encinitas Encinitas Const. $127,000 Chesterfield to Solana Beach 40 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego – Pacific Hwy San Diego Const. $3,994,000 (Taylor St to W. Washington St) 41 San Ysidro to Imperial Beach - Bayshore Bikeway Imperial Beach/ Const. $6,204,000 Connection San Diego 42 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Pacific Hwy San Diego Const. $7,270,000 (Fiesta Island Rd to Taylor St) 43 San Diego River Trail - Father Junipero Serra Trail Santee Const. $7,412,000 to Santee 44 Bayshore Bikeway - Barrio Logan San Diego Const. $13,591,000
45 Downtown to Southeast connections San Diego Const. $17,015,000
46 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - UTC San Diego Const. $2,691,000
47 City Heights /Encanto/Lemon Grove Lemon Grove/ Const. $7,045,000 San Diego 48 City Heights/Fairmount Corridor San Diego Const. $12,216,000
49 Rolando to Grossmont/La Mesa La Mesa/ Const. $2,469,000 El Cajon/ San Diego 50 La Mesa/Lemon Grove/El Cajon connections Lemon Grove/ Const. $5,458,000 La Mesa
26 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 21 Table M.6 (continued) Regional Bike Plan Network Corridor Rankings Early Action Program (EAP) (continued)
EAP Funding Through Cost Project Jurisdiction(s) Priority Project Phase ($2014) 51 Coastal Rail Trail - Rose Canyon San Diego Const. $8,433,000
52 San Diego River Trail - Qualcomm Stadium to San Diego Const. $1,568,000 Ward Rd 53 San Diego River Trail - Rancho Mission Road to San Diego Const. $263,000 Camino Del Rio North 54 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Rose Creek Mission San Diego Const. $3,990,000 Bay Connection 55 Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 4 Cannon to Carlsbad Const. $5,084,000 Palomar Airport Rd 56 Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 5 Palomar Carlsbad Const. $2,738,000 Airport Rd to Poinsettia Station 57 Coastal Rail Trail Encinitas - Carlsbad to Leucadia Encinitas Const. $6,634,000
58 Coastal Rail Trail Del Mar Del Mar Const. $396,000
59 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Del Mar to Del Mar/ Const. $411,000 Sorrento via Carmel Valley San Diego 60 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Carmel Valley to San Diego Const. $867,000 Roselle via Sorrento 61 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Roselle Canyon San Diego Const. $4,958,000
62 Chula Vista National City connections Chula Vista/ Const. $10,516,000 National City 63 Pacific Beach to Mission Beach San Diego Const. $9,509,000
64 Ocean Beach to Mission Bay San Diego Const. $23,815,000
65 San Diego River Trail - Bridge connection San Diego Const. $7,259,000 (Sefton Field to Mission Valley YMCA) 66 San Diego River Trail - Mast Park to Lakeside Santee Const. $10,335,000 baseball park 67 I-8 Flyover San Diego Const. $9,914,000 (Camino del Rio South to Camino del Rio North) 68 Coastal Rail Trail Oceanside - Broadway to Eaton Oceanside Const. $445,000
69 El Cajon - Santee connections El Cajon/ Const. $12,289,000 La Mesa/ Santee 70 San Diego River Trail - Father JS Trail to West San Diego Const. $2,883,000 Hills Parkway 71 Inland Rail Trail Oceanside Oceanside Const. $18,786,000
72 Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 3 Tamarack to Carlsbad Const. $4,814,000 Cannon 73 Clairemont Dr (Mission Bay to Burgener) San Diego Const. $7,688,000
27 22 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.6 (continued) Regional Bike Plan Network Corridor Rankings Early Action Program (EAP) (continued)
EAP Funding Through Cost Project Jurisdiction(s) Priority Project Phase ($2014) 74 Harbor Dr (Downtown to Ocean Beach) San Diego Const. $6,980,000
75 Mira Mesa Bike Blvd San Diego Const. $3,751,000
76 Sweetwater River Bikeway Ramps National City Const. $8,883,000
77 Coastal Rail Trail Oceanside - Alta Loma Marsh Oceanside Const. $4,684,000 bridge 78 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Mission Bay San Diego Const. $3,092,000 (Clairemont to Tecolote) 79 Bayshore Bikeway Coronado - Golf course Coronado Const. $2,817,000 adjacent Non-Early Action Program (EAP)
Non- EAP Corridor Corridor Limits Jurisdiction Priority 80 Coastal Rail Trail Del Mar segments Del Mar
81 Central Coast Corridor Coastal Rail Trail, Del Mar to Bayshore Bikeway Del Mar, San Diego 82 Kearny Mesa-Beaches Corridor Central Coast Corridor, Pacific Beach to I-15 Bikeway San Diego
83 San Diego River Bikeway Segments west of I-805 San Diego
84 SR 125 Corridor San Diego River Bikeway, Santee to Otay Mesa Santee, Border Crossing County, San Diego, Chula Vista 85 Mira Mesa Corridor Coastal Rail Trail to I-15 Bikeway San Diego
86 Mid-County Bikeway Coastal Rail Trail, Del Mar to Inland Rail Trail Del Mar, County, Escondido 87 Bay to Ranch Bikeway Bayshore Bikeway to Chula Vista Greenbelt Chula Vista
88 Escondido Creek Bikeway I-15 Bikeway, Escondido to Valley Centre Rd Escondido
89 Chula Vista Greenbelt Bayshore Bikeway, San Diego to SR 125 Corridor Chula Vista
90 SR 52 Bikeway Coastal Rail Trail to San Diego River Bikeway San Diego
91 Sweetwater River Bikeway Bayshore Bikeway to SR 125 Corridor National City, Chula Vista 92 Vista Way Connector San Luis Rey River Trail to Inland Rail Trail Vista, County
93 SR 905 Corridor Border Access Corridor to Future SR 11 Border San Diego, Crossing County
28 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 23 Table M.6 (continued) Regional Bike Plan Network Corridor Rankings Non-Early Action Program (EAP) (continued)
Non- EAP Corridor Corridor Limits Jurisdiction Priority 94 Carlsbad-San Marcos Corridor Coastal Rail Trail, Carlsbad to Inland Rail Trail, Carlsbad, San Marcos San Marcos 95 I-15 Bikeway Northern boundary of County to City Heights - Escondido, Old Town Corridor City of San Diego 96 San Luis Rey River Trail Coastal Rail Trail Oceanside to I-15 Bikeway (County) Oceanside, County 97 Camp Pendleton Trail Northern boundary of County to San Luis Rey River USMC Trail 98 Encinitas - San Marcos Coastal Rail Trail, Inland Rail Trail Encinitas, Corridor San Marcos 99 I-8 Corridor SR 125 Corridor to Japatul Valley Rd County of San Diego 100 SR 56 Bikeway Coastal Rail Trail to I-15 Bikeway San Diego
101 El Camino Real San Luis Rey River Trail to Coastal Rail Trail, Encinitas Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas 102 East County Northern Loop SR 125 Corridor, La Mesa to SR 125 Corridor, El Cajon, County La Mesa, County 103 East County Southern Loop East County Northern Loop, El Cajon to SR 125 County Corridor Bike Plan EAP Estimated Cost (Priorities 1-79) $460.5 M
Regional Bike Plan Non-EAP Estimated Cost (Priorities 80-103) $276.7 M
Regional Bike Plan Estimated Cost $737.2 M
Managed Lane Connectors Managed Lane connectors will facilitate direct Managed Lane to Managed Lane access and allow for continuous movement on the HOV or Managed Lanes network. The six criteria and weighting for the Managed Lanes Connectors are shown in Table M.7. The 22 Managed Lane connectors evaluated for the Regional Plan are listed in priority order by pairs in Table M.8.
29 24 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.7 Project Evaluation Criteria Managed Lane Connector Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Innovative Mobility & Planning 1 Provides Congestion Relief What is the number of daily person- Change in daily person-hours 15 35 Mobility Choices hours saved from implementing the saved project?
2 Provides Access to Evacuation How will the project provide Proximity analysis of hazard 5 Preservation and Safety of Routes evacuation access for regional hazard areas (dam failure, earthquake, the Transportation System, areas? flood, landslide, liquefaction, Partnerships and tsunami, and wildfire), Collaboration, Binational weighted by population and Collaboration with Baja employment California
3 Facilitates FasTrak/Carpool/ How will the project facilitate FasTrak/ Projects will receive points if 15 Mobility, Complete Transit, Pedestrian and Bike carpool/Managed Lane facilities they include FasTrak/carpool/ Communities Mobility and/or regional or corridor transit Managed Lane facility, and/or services and/or pedestrian and bike regional or corridor transit access? services, and/or pedestrian and bike facilities, which is then weighted by combined carpool person volume + transit person volume
30 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 25 Table M.7 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Managed Lane Connector Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Healthy Environment & Communities 4 Minimizes Habitat and How will the project minimize Proximity analysis of preserve 15 30 Habitat and Open Space Residential Impacts negative habitat and residential areas, native habitats, and Preservation, Environmental impacts? housing (more than two Stewardship dwelling units per acre)
5 greenhouse gas and Pollutant A) What is the reduction in CO2 Reduction in CO2 emissions 10 Environmental Stewardship, Emissions emissions from implementing the Energy and Climate Change project? Mitigation and Adaptation
B) What is the reduction in smog Reduction in smog forming 5 forming pollutants from implementing pollutants the project?
Vibrant Economy 6 Project Cost-Effectiveness What is the cost-effectiveness of the Enhanced cost-effectiveness 35 35 Mobility Choices, Regional project? measure incorporates the Economic Prosperity, following components: Binational Collaboration with Baja California, - Project cost Preservation and Safety of - Generalized delay costs the Transportation System, - Fuel costs Environmental Stewardship, - greenhouse gas emissions Energy and Climate Change - Smog forming pollutants Mitigation and Adaptation - Physical activity - Safety
31 26 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.8 Managed Lane Connector Project Rankings Intersecting Unconstrained Regional Freeway/ Total TransNet Freeway/ Movement Cost ($2014) Plan Project Highway Score Highway (millions) Rank
TransNet I-15 SR 78 East to South and North to West $106 62.4 1
TransNet I-5 I-805 North to North and South to South $101 61.6 2
I-805 SR 52 West to North and South to East $91 56.8 3
SR 15 I-805 North to North and South to South $81 53.2 4
I-5 SR 15 North to North and South to South $197 52.4 5
I-15 SR 52 West to North and South to East $131 49.5 6
I-15 SR 56 East to North and South to West $172 48.4 7
I-5 SR 78 South to East and West to North, $253 47.8 8 North to East and West to South
I-805 SR 94 North to West and East to South $101 46.1 9
I-5 SR 56 South to East and West to North $177 41.1 10
I-15 SR 163 North to North and South to South $162 40.5 11
I-805 SR 94 West to South and North to East $217 37.4 12
SR 94 SR 125 North to North and South to South $146 37.3 13
I-5 SR 56 North to East and West to South $152 35.3 14
I-805 SR 163 North to North and South to South $192 33.5 15
I-15 SR 52 West to South and North to East $141 33.0 16
I-805 SR 54 North to West and East to South $157 30.6 17
I-805 SR 94 East to North and South to East $212 26.4 18
I-5 SR 54 West to South and North to East $121 24.8 19
SR 52 SR 125 North to West and East to South $111 23.4 20
I-5 SR 54 South to East and West to North $121 22.3 21
TransNet SR 15 SR 94 South to West and East to North $71 16.1 22
32 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 27 Freeway-to-Freeway Connectors Freeway Connectors provide “missing link” connections between freeways. Many of the criteria from the highway corridor criteria are also utilized in this category. There are seven criteria for the Freeway Connectors, which are shown in Table M.9. The list of nine freeway-to-freeway connector projects evaluated for the Regional Plan can be seen in Table M.10 in priority order.
33 28 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.9 Project Evaluation Criteria Freeway Connector Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Innovative Mobility & Planning 1 Provides Congestion What is the number of daily Change in daily person-hours 20 35 Mobility Choices Relief person-hours saved from saved implementing the project?*
2 Project Safety How does the project Project percentage of crash 5 Preservation and Safety of the Transportation compare against the statewide rates measured against System average for collisions?* statewide averages
3 Provides Access to How will the project provide Proximity analysis of hazard 10 Preservation and Safety of the Transportation Evacuation Routes evacuation access for regional areas (dam failure, System, Partnerships and Collaboration, hazard areas? earthquake, flood, landslide, Binational Collaboration with Baja California liquefaction, tsunami, and wildfire), weighted by population and employment
Healthy Environment & Communities
4 Minimizes Habitat and How will the project minimize Proximity analysis of preserve 15 30 Habitat and Open Space Preservation, Residential Impacts negative habitat and areas, native habitats, and Environmental Stewardship residential impacts?* housing (more than two dwelling units per acre)
5 greenhouse gas and A) What is the reduction in Reduction in CO2 emissions 10 Environmental Stewardship, Energy and
Pollutant Emissions CO2 emissions from Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation implementing the project?*
B) What is the reduction in Reduction in smog forming 5 smog forming pollutants from pollutants implementing the project?*
34 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 29 Table M.9 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Freeway Connector Max Total No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Score Percent Policy Objectives
Vibrant Economy
6 Serves Goods What is the improved average Total travel time savings for 15 35 Mobility Choices, Regional Economic Movement and travel time for freight?* medium and heavy truck Prosperity, Binational Collaboration with Baja Relieves Freight System classes California Bottlenecks/Capacity Constraints
7 Project Cost- What is the cost-effectiveness Enhanced cost-effectiveness 20 Mobility Choices, Regional Economic Effectiveness of the project?* measure incorporates the Prosperity, Binational Collaboration with Baja following components: California, Preservation and Safety of the Transportation System, Environmental - Project cost Stewardship, Energy and Climate Change - Generalized delay costs Mitigation and Adaptation - Fuel costs - greenhouse gas emissions - Smog forming pollutants - Physical activity - Safety
* Provides dual evaluation for both passenger vehicles and trucks.
35 30 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.10 Freeway Connector Project Rankings Regional Intersecting Unconstrained Freeway/ Total Plan TransNet Freeway/ Movement Cost ($2014) Highway Score Project Highway (millions) Rank East to North and South to I-5 I-8 $326 88.4 1 West South to East and West to TransNet I-5 SR 78 $275 50.1 2 South
TransNet SR 94 SR 125 South to East $61 46.4 3
TransNet SR 94 SR 125 West to North $82 34.2 4
West to North and South to TransNet I-5 SR 56 $275 32.7 5 East
I-5 SR 94 North to East $133 27.6 6
I-15 SR 56 North to West $102 19.0 7
South Bay Expressway Connector Projects SB 125 to EB 905 & WB 905 SR 905 SR 125 $20 85 1 to NB 125 SB 125 to WB 905 & EB 905 SR 905 SR 125 $77 39 2 to NB 125
Rail Grade Separation Criteria The evaluation criteria for rail grade separation projects were initially developed by the San Diego Regional Traffic Engineers Council (SANTEC) composed of the local jurisdictions’ traffic engineers. These criteria have been refined over the years when developing RTPs. The criteria approved by the SANDAG Board for San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan includes two new elements: the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from implementing the project and project cost-effectiveness. These elements were added to provide consistency with evaluation criteria for other modes or project types. In addition, the pedestrian benefits criterion was refined for the Regional Plan as pedestrian and bike/disadvantaged communities benefits to be more inclusive of benefits to cyclists and to consider the share of disadvantaged communities (low-income, minorities, and seniors 75+) within a half mile of the project.
Projects were prioritized based on two criteria categories: project-specific criteria and Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) housing production. The project-specific criteria are worth 75 percent, and the RHNA housing production criteria comprises 25 percent of the total project score. The criteria and weightings are shown in Table M.11. The final rankings are included in Table M.12.
36 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 31 Table M.11 Project Evaluation Criteria Rail Grade Separations San Diego Forward: No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Max Total Policy Objectives The Regional Plan Score Percent Goals
Innovative Mobility & 1 Peak-Period Exposure Product of the existing high Calculation based on vehicle 11 34 Mobility Choices Planning Index (PPEI) Factor directional traffic and the total traffic during a selected three- measured blocking delay during hour period, total blocking the same three hours of the day delay during same period, and experiencing the highest mathematical constant for time congestion at the crossing period 2 Peak-Day Total Delay Product of the existing average Calculation based on average 11 Mobility Choices Exposure Index (PDEI) daily traffic (ADT), the total daily traffic, total number of Factor number of trains, and an average trains, train crossing delay train crossing delay time factor factor, and mathematical constant 3 Pedestrian and Bike/ A) Number of pedestrians and Grade separation pedestrian 4 Mobility Choices, Disadvantaged people biking served in top 4 bike crossing counts Complete Communities Benefits hours Communities B) What is the share of Ratio of disadvantaged Mobility Choices, disadvantaged communities communities share of Partnerships and population in the proximity of the population within 1/2 mile of Collaboration project? project compared to disadvantaged communities share of regional population 4 Bus Operations Number of buses served an hour, Number of buses served by the 4 Mobility Choices, Benefits as well as proximity to transit grade separation Complete center Communities 5 Benefit to Emergency Proximity to emergency service Proximity analysis based on 4 Mobility Choices, Services provider and lack of nearby emergency service providers Complete alternative grade-separated and alternative grade Communities crossing separation crossing
37 32 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.11 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Rail Grade Separations (continued) San Diego Forward: No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Max Total Policy Objectives The Regional Plan Score Percent Goals
Healthy Environment 6 Accident History Accident history in the past five Number of qualifying accidents 11 26 Mobility Choices, & Communities years involving vehicles, pedestrians, Preservation and and bikes with trains, not Safety of the including accidents involved in Transportation attempted suicides System
7 Proximity to Noise Proximity to sensitive receptors Proximity analysis based on rail 4 Complete Sensitive Receptors crossing located within 200-500 Communities, feet of sensitive receptors Partnerships and Collaboration
8 greenhouse gas What is the reduction in CO2 Reduction in CO2 emissions 4 Environmental Emissions emissions from implementing the Stewardship, project? Energy and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
9 Serves RCP Smart Is the project located near RCP Population and employment in 7 Complete Growth Areas Smart Growth Areas? all smart growth areas within Communities, 1/4 mile distance of project Regional Economic Prosperity, Habitat and Open Space Preservation
38 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 33 Table M.11 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Rail Grade Separations (continued) San Diego Forward: No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Max Total Policy Objectives The Regional Plan Score Percent Goals
Vibrant Economy 10 Truck Freight Percentage of daily truck traffic Percentage of daily traffic of 3 15 Mobility Choices, Operations Class 4-Class 13 (as defined by Regional Economic FHWA) Prosperity, Binational Collaboration with Baja California 11 Funding Request Percentage of total project costs Percentage of local contribution 4 Partnerships and contributed by the local agency Collaboration including funds already committed from state, federal, or other source 12 Project Cost- What is the cost-effectiveness of Enhanced cost-effectiveness 8 Mobility Choices, Effectiveness the project? measure incorporates the Regional Economic following components: Prosperity, - Number of trains per day Binational - AADT Collaboration with - Gate down time Baja California, - Percent truck traffic Environmental - Safety Stewardship, Energy and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, Preservation and Safety of the Transportation System
39 34 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.11 (continued) Project Evaluation Criteria Rail Grade Separations (continued) San Diego Forward: No. Criteria Description Proposed Calculation Max Total Policy Objectives The Regional Plan Score Percent Goals
Regional Housing 13 Regional Housing RHNA-related criteria as described Based on Board Policy No. 033 25 25 Complete Needs Assessment Needs Assessment in Board Policy No. 033. Eligibility Criteria: RHNA Share Taken; Communities, (RHNA) (RHNA) (per Board for Policy 33 points requires Regional Share of Cumulative Partnerships and Policy No. 033 housing element compliance and Total of Lower-Income Units Collaboration adopted January submittal of Annual Housing Produced; Total Number of 2012) Element Progress Reports to Affordable Housing Units; SANDAG. Percent of Lower Income Households
40 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 35 Table M.12 Rail Grade Separation Project Rankings
Unconstrained Average Trains Total Regional Rail Name City Cost ($2014) Daily Per Score Plan Rank Designation (millions) Traffic Day
Palomar St Chula Vista $41 44,364 206 62.63 1 Light Rail Broadway/ Lemon Grove $82 40,403 144 60.19 2 Light Rail Lemon Grove Ave Ash St San Diego $103 30,575 195 59.81 3 Light Rail
H St Chula Vista $41 41,861 206 59.63 4 Light Rail
Washington St San Diego $41 30,345 195 58.81 5 Light Rail
E St Chula Vista $41 39,783 206 58.63 6 Light Rail
Broadway San Diego $113 27,845 150 55.81 7 Light Rail Light/Heavy Taylor St San Diego $113 42,670 195 55.81 7 Rail Euclid Ave San Diego $41 37,000 144 50.81 9 Light Rail
28th St San Diego $41 33,225 206 49.81 10 Light Rail
32nd St San Diego $41 32,470 206 46.81 11 Light Rail
Civic Center Dr Vista $41 34,916 68 44.44 12 Light Rail Auto Parkway and Escondido $36 27,623 68 42.13 13 Light Rail Mission Ave Sorrento Valley Blvd San Diego $134 37,990 51 40.81 14 Heavy Rail
Allison Ave/University Ave La Mesa $103 24,700 144 40.50 15 Light Rail
North Dr Vista $31 8,793 68 39.94 16 Light Rail
Vista Village Dr/Main St Vista $62 24,927 68 39.44 17 Light Rail
Severin Dr La Mesa $41 8,311 288 37.94 18 Light Rail
El Camino Real Oceanside $41 38,000 68 36.06 19 Light Rail Grand Ave/ Carlsbad $113 21,113 51 35.00 20 Heavy Rail Carlsbad Village Dr Melrose Dr Vista $41 25,921 68 31.94 21 Light Rail
Mar Vista Dr Vista $31 9,665 68 29.94 22 Light Rail
Los Angeles Dr Vista $31 4,291 68 29.94 22 Light Rail
Guajome St Vista $31 4,152 68 26.94 24 Light Rail
Leucadia Blvd Encinitas $93 34,000 51 18.50 25 Heavy Rail
Tamarack Ave Carlsbad $93 10,568 51 18.00 26 Heavy Rail
Cannon Road Carlsbad $93 6,416 51 12.00 27 Heavy Rail
* Downtown heavy rail trench in San Diego (Washington, Laurel, Hawthorn, Ash and Broadway Streets) excluded from rankings due to construction feasibility issues.
41 36 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Regional Arterial System The Regional Arterial System (RAS) constitutes that part of the local street and road network which, in conjunction with the system of highways and transit services, provides for a significant amount of mobility throughout the region. The RAS includes roads eligible for the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RCTIP) included in the TransNet Ordinance and other funding. The RAS was last updated through an extensive process as part of the 2030 RTP. Minor adjustments were requested by some local jurisdictions for the 2050 Regional Plan. A Regional Arterial System has been included as part of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) since 1989 and includes 1,090 miles of roads.
Regional arterials are considered to be longer contiguous routes that provide accessibility between communities within the region and which also may allow subregional trips to avoid freeway travel. Regional Plan RAS modifications and additions to the RAS are shown in bold in Table M.13.
Regional arterial system screening criteria In order to qualify for the updated Regional Arterial System (RAS), arterials must meet at least one of four approved criteria shown below. The first criterion is that the arterial is already included in the existing RAS. Any additions to the network must meet one of the remaining three criteria:
• Provides parallel capacity in high-volume corridors to supplement freeways, state highways, and/or other regional arterials (Corridor)
• Provides capacity and a direct connection between freeways or other regional arterials, ensuring continuity of the freeway, state highways, and arterial network throughout the region without duplicating other regional facilities (Cross-corridor)
• Provides all or part of the route for existing or planned regional and/or corridor transit service that provides headways of 15 minutes or less during the peak-period.
There are certain design characteristics that can help facilitate regional trip movements on the Regional Arterial System. These characteristics can help to facilitate trip movement and include:
• Interconnection and systems management of traffic signals
• Raised or striped medians
• Limitation and separation of left-turn movements
• Limited driveway access and other access controls
• Grade separations at rail crossings
• Shoulders and bikeways to accommodate bike movement
• Pedestrian treatments at intersections
• Priority traffic signal systems for transit service
• Bypass or “queue-jumper” lanes for transit service at critical intersections
• Enhanced transit stops
• Pedestrian facilities designed according to the Regional Pedestrian Design Guidelines
• Modern roundabouts and alternate intersection design where appropriate
• Freeway interchange modifications in accordance with Caltrans standards
42 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 37 A complete listing of the Regional Arterial System is provided in Table M.13 and shown in Figure M.1. All freeway interchanges are considered part of the Regional Arterial System.
Table M.13 Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
1 Cannon Rd Carlsbad Blvd to Buena Vista Dr Carlsbad
2 Carlsbad Blvd Eaton St to La Costa Ave Carlsbad
3 Carlsbad Village Dr Interstate 5 to Coast Blvd/Coast Highway Carlsbad
4 College Blvd City of Oceanside to Palomar Airport Rd Carlsbad
5 El Camino Real (S-11) State Route 78 to Olivenhain Carlsbad
6 Faraday Ave Melrose Dr to College Blvd Carlsbad
7 La Costa Ave Interstate 5 to El Camino Real Carlsbad
8 Melrose Dr City of Vista to Rancho Santa Fe Rd Carlsbad
9 Olivenhain Rd Los Pinos Circle to Rancho Santa Fe Rd Carlsbad
10 Palomar Airport Rd Carlsbad Blvd to Business Park Dr Carlsbad
11 Poinsettia Lane Carlsbad Blvd to Melrose Dr Carlsbad
12 Rancho Santa Fe Rd Melrose Dr to Olivenhain Rd Carlsbad
13 Bay Blvd E St to Stella St Chula Vista
14 Beyer Way Main St to City of San Diego Chula Vista
15 Bonita Rd 1st Ave to Interstate 805 Chula Vista
16 Broadway C St to Main St Chula Vista
17 E St H St to Bonita Rd Chula Vista
18 East H St Hilltop Dr to Mount Miguel Rd Chula Vista
19 H St E St to Hilltop Dr Chula Vista
20 Hunte Parkway Proctor Valley R to Eastlake Parkway Chula Vista
21 J St Marina Parkway to Broadway Chula Vista
22 L St Bay Blvd to Interstate 805 Chula Vista
23 La Media Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd to Main St Chula Vista
24 Main St West City limits to Eastlake Parkway Chula Vista
25 Marina Parkway H St to J St Chula Vista
26 Olympic Parkway Interstate 805 to Hunte Parkway Chula Vista
27 Orange Ave Palomar St to Interstate 805 Chula Vista
28 Otay Lakes Rd Bonita Rd to Wueste Rd Chula Vista
29 Otay Valley Rd) Main St to East of State Route 125 Chula Vista
43 38 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
30 Palomar St Bay Blvd to Orange Ave Chula Vista
31 Paseo Ranchero (Heritage Rd) East H St to City of San Diego Chula Vista
32 Proctor Valley Rd Mt. Miguel Rd to Hunte Parkway Chula Vista
33 Telegraph Canyon Rd Interstate 805 to Otay Lakes Rd Chula Vista
34 Willow St Sweetwater Rd to Bonita Rd Chula Vista
35 State Route 75 City of San Diego to City of Imperial Beach Coronado
36 Via de la Valle Highway 101 to Jimmy Durante Blvd Del Mar
37 2nd St Greenfield Dr to Main St El Cajon
38 Avocado Ave Main St to Chase Ave El Cajon
39 Avocado Blvd Chase Ave to Dewitt Court El Cajon
40 Ballantyne St Broadway to Main St El Cajon
41 Bradley Ave Cuyamaca St to County of San Diego El Cajon
42 Broadway State Route 67 to East Main St El Cajon
43 Chase Ave El Cajon Blvd to Rancho Valle Court El Cajon
44 Cuyamaca St City of Santee to Marshall Ave El Cajon
45 E Main St Broadway to Lavala Lane El Cajon
46 El Cajon Blvd Chase Ave to West Main St El Cajon
47 Fletcher Parkway City of La Mesa to State Route 67 El Cajon
48 Greenfield Dr Ballantyne St to Interstate 8 El Cajon
49 Jamacha Rd Main St to Grove Rd El Cajon
50 Marshall Ave Cuyamaca St to Fletcher Parkway El Cajon
51 Marshall Ave Fletcher Parkway to West Main St El Cajon
52 Marshall Ave West Main St to Washington Ave El Cajon
53 Navajo Rd State Route 125 to Fletcher Parkway El Cajon
54 Washington Ave El Cajon Blvd to Granite Hills Dr El Cajon
55 West Main St Interstate 8 to Marshall Ave El Cajon
56 Coast Highway City of Carlsbad to City of Solana Beach Encinitas
57 El Camino Real Olivenhain to Manchester Ave Encinitas
58 Encinitas Blvd Coast Highway 101 to El Camino Real Encinitas
59 La Costa Ave Coast Highway 101 to Interstate 5 Encinitas
60 Leucadia Blvd Coast Highway 101 to El Camino Real Encinitas
44 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 39 Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
61 Manchester Ave El Camino Real to Interstate 5 Encinitas
62 Olivenhain Rd El Camino Real to Los Pinos Circle Encinitas
63 Barham Dr Los Amigos to Mission Rd Escondido
64 Centre City Parkway Country Club Lane (Interstate 15) to South Escondido Escondido Blvd/South Centre City Parkway (Interstate 15)
65 Citracado Parkway Centre City Parkway to State Route 78 Escondido
66 East Valley Parkway Broadway to Valley Center Grade Rd Escondido
67 East Via Rancho Parkway Broadway to Sunset Dr Escondido
68 El Norte Parkway Nordahl Rd to Washington Ave Escondido
69 El Norte Parkway Woodland Parkway to Rees Rd Escondido
70 Felicita/17th Ave Interstate 15 to State Route 78 Escondido
71 Grand Ave/2nd Ave/Valley Blvd West Valley Parkway to East Valley Parkway Escondido
72 Hale Ave Washington Ave to Interstate 15 Escondido
73 Lincoln/Ash Parkway Broadway to Washington Ave Escondido
74 Mission Ave Andreason Dr to Centre City Parkway Escondido
75 Mission Rd Barham Dr to Andreason Dr Escondido
76 Via Rancho Parkway Del Dios Highway to Sunset Dr Escondido
77 Washington Ave State Route 78 to East Valley Parkway Escondido
78 West Valley Parkway Claudan Rd to Broadway Escondido
79 State Route 75 City of Coronado to City of San Diego Imperial Beach
80 70th St University Ave to Colony Rd La Mesa
81 70th St Saranac St to Interstate 8 La Mesa
82 El Cajon Blvd 73rd St to Interstate 8 La Mesa
83 Fletcher Parkway Interstate 8 to City of El Cajon La Mesa
84 Grossmont Center Dr Interstate 8 to Fletcher Parkway La Mesa
85 Jackson Dr La Mesa Blvd to North City limits La Mesa
86 La Mesa Blvd University Ave to Interstate 8 La Mesa
87 Lake Murray Interstate 8 to Dallas St La Mesa
88 Massachusetts Ave State Route 94 to University Ave La Mesa
89 Spring St Interstate 8 to State Route 125 La Mesa
90 University Ave 69th St to La Mesa Blvd La Mesa
45 40 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
91 Broadway Spring St to Lemon Grove Ave Lemon Grove
92 College Ave Livingston St to Federal Blvd Lemon Grove
93 Federal Blvd College Ave to State Route 94 Lemon Grove
94 Lemon Grove Ave Viewcrest Dr to State Route 94 Lemon Grove
95 Massachusetts Ave Broadway to State Route 94 Lemon Grove
96 Massachusetts Ave Lemon Grove Ave to Broadway Lemon Grove
97 Sweetwater Rd Broadway to Troy St Lemon Grove
98 30th St National City Blvd to 2nd St National City
99 Euclid Ave Cervantes Ave to Sweetwater Rd National City
100 Harbor Dr City of San Diego to Interstate 5 National City
101 National City Blvd Division St to 30th St National City
102 Palm Ave Interstate 805 to 18th St National City
103 Paradise Valley Rd 8th St to Plaza Blvd National City
104 Plaza Blvd National City Blvd to 8th St National City
105 Sweetwater Rd 2nd St to Plaza Bonita Center Way National City
106 Coast Highway Interstate 5 to Eaton St Oceanside
107 College Blvd North River Rd to State Route 78 Oceanside
108 El Camino Real Douglas Dr to State Route 78 Oceanside
109 Melrose Dr State Route 76 to Rancho Santa Fe Rd Oceanside
110 Mission Ave Coast Highway to Frazee Rd Oceanside
111 North River Rd Douglas Dr to State Route 76 Oceanside
112 North Santa Fe Ave State Route 76 to Melrose Dr Oceanside
113 Oceanside Blvd Coast Highway to Melrose Dr Oceanside
114 Rancho del Oro Dr State Route 78 to State Route 76 Oceanside
115 Vandegrift Blvd North River Rd to Camp Pendleton Oceanside
116 West Vista Way Jefferson St to Thunder Dr Oceanside
117 Camino del Norte World Trade Dr to Pomerado Rd Poway
118 Community Rd Twin Peaks Rd to Scripps Poway Parkway Poway
119 Espola Rd Summerfield Lane to Poway Rd Poway
120 Pomerado Rd Stonemill Dr to Gateway Park Rd Poway
121 Poway Rd Springhurst Dr to State Route 67 Poway
46 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 41 Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
122 Scripps Poway Parkway Springbrook Dr to Sycamore Canyon Rd Poway
123 Ted Williams Parkway Pomerado Rd to Twin Peaks Rd Poway
124 Twin Peaks Rd Pomerado Rd to Espola Rd Poway
125 1st Ave Harbor Dr to Interstate 5 San Diego City
126 4th Ave Market St to Washington St San Diego City
127 5th Ave Market St to Washington St San Diego City
128 6th Ave Ash St to State Route 163 San Diego City
129 10th Ave State Route 163 to Imperial Ave San Diego City
130 11th Ave G St to State Route 163 San Diego City
131 32nd St Harbor Dr to Wabash Blvd San Diego City
132 47th St State Route 94 to Interstate 805 San Diego City
133 54th St El Cajon Blvd to Euclid Ave San Diego City
134 70th St Colony Rd to Saranac St San Diego City
135 A St 11th Ave to Kettner Blvd San Diego City
136 Adams Ave Park Blvd to Interstate 15 San Diego City
137 Aero Dr State Route 163 to Interstate 15 San Diego City
138 Airway Rd Caliente Ave to State Route 125 San Diego City
139 Ash St Harbor Dr to 10th Ave San Diego City
140 Auto Circle Camino del Rio North to Camino del Rio South San Diego City
141 Balboa Ave Mission Bay Dr to Interstate 15 San Diego City
142 Barnett Ave Lytton St to Pacific Highway San Diego City
143 Bernardo Center Dr Camino del Norte to Interstate 15 San Diego City
144 Beyer Blvd Main St to East Beyer Blvd San Diego City
145 Beyer Way Main St to Palm Ave San Diego City
146 Britannia Blvd Otay Mesa Rd to Siempre Viva Rd San Diego City
147 Black Mountain Rd Del Mar Heights Rd to Carroll Canyon Rd San Diego City
148 Broadway Harbor Dr to 11th Ave San Diego City
149 Cabrillo Memorial Dr Cochran St to Cabrillo National Monument San Diego City
150 Camino del Norte Camino San Bernardo to World Trade Dr San Diego City
151 Camino del Rio North Mission Center Rd to Mission Gorge Rd San Diego City
152 Camino Ruiz Mira Mesa Blvd to Miramar Rd San Diego City
47 42 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
153 Camino Ruiz State Route 56 to Camino del Norte San Diego City
154 Camino Santa Fe Ave Sorrento Valley Blvd to Miramar Rd San Diego City
155 Canon St Rosecrans St to Catalina Blvd San Diego City
156 Carmel Mountain Rd Camino del Norte to Rancho Peñasquitos Blvd San Diego City
157 Carmel Mountain Rd Sorrento Valley Rd to El Camino Real San Diego City
158 Carmel Valley Rd North Torrey Pines Rd to El Camino Real San Diego City
159 Catalina Blvd Canon St to Cochran St San Diego City
160 Clairemont Dr Clairemont Mesa Blvd to Interstate 5 San Diego City
161 Clairemont Mesa Blvd Interstate 15 to Regents Rd San Diego City
162 College Ave Navajo Rd to Livingston St San Diego City
163 Collwood Blvd Montezuma Rd to El Cajon Blvd San Diego City
164 Convoy St Linda Vista Rd to State Route 52 San Diego City
165 Cesar E. Chavez Parkway Interstate 5 to Harbor Dr San Diego City
166 Dairy Mart Rd State Route 905 to Interstate 5 San Diego City
167 Del Dios Highway Via Rancho Parkway to Claudan Rd San Diego City
168 Del Mar Heights Rd Interstate 5 to Carmel Valley Rd San Diego City
169 El Cajon Blvd Park Blvd to 73rd St San Diego City
170 El Camino Real Via de la Valle to Carmel Mountain Rd San Diego City
171 Euclid Ave 54th St to Cervantes Ave San Diego City
172 F St State Route 94 to 10th Ave San Diego City
173 Fairmount Ave Interstate 8 to State Route 94 San Diego City
174 Friars Rd Sea World Dr to Mission Gorge Rd San Diego City
175 Front St Interstate 5 to Market St San Diego City
176 G St State Route 94 to 10th Ave San Diego City
177 Garnet Ave Balboa Ave to Mission Bay Dr San Diego City
178 Genesee Ave North Torrey Pines Rd to State Route 163 San Diego City
179 Gilman Dr La Jolla Village Dr to Interstate 5 San Diego City
180 Grand Ave Mission Blvd to Mission Bay Dr San Diego City
181 Governor Dr Interstate 805 to Regents Rd San Diego City
182 Grape St North Harbor Dr to Interstate 5 San Diego City
183 Harbor Dr Pacific Highway to City of National City San Diego City
48 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 43 Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
184 Hawthorn St Interstate 5 to North Harbor Dr San Diego City
185 Heritage Rd Otay Mesa Rd to Siempre Viva Rd San Diego City
186 Heritage Rd Otay Valley Rd to City of Chula Vista San Diego City
187 Imperial Ave Park Blvd to Lisbon St San Diego City
188 Ingraham St Sunset Cliffs Blvd to Grand Ave San Diego City
189 Kearny Villa Rd Pomerado Rd to Aero Dr San Diego City
190 Kettner Blvd Interstate 5 to India St San Diego City
191 La Jolla Blvd Pearl St to Turquoise St San Diego City
192 La Jolla Parkway Torrey Pines Rd to Interstate 5 San Diego City
193 La Jolla Shores Dr Torrey Pines Rd to North Torrey Pines Rd San Diego City
194 La Jolla Village Dr North Torrey Pines Rd to Interstate 805 San Diego City
195 La Media Rd Otay Mesa Rd to Siempre Viva Rd San Diego City
196 Lake Murray Blvd Dallas St to Navajo Rd San Diego City
197 Laurel St North Harbor Dr to Interstate 5 San Diego City
198 Lemon Grove Ave Lisbon St to Viewcrest Dr San Diego City
199 Linda Vista Rd Morena Blvd to Convoy St San Diego City
200 Lytton St Rosecrans St to Barnett Ave San Diego City
201 Market St Harbor Dr to Euclid Ave San Diego City
202 Mercy Rd Black Mountain Rd to Interstate 15 San Diego City
203 Mesa College Dr Interstate 805 to Marlesta Dr San Diego City
204 Midway Dr West Point Loma Blvd to Barnett Ave San Diego City
205 Mira Mesa Blvd Interstate 805 to Interstate 15 San Diego City
206 Miramar Rd Interstate 805 to Interstate 15 San Diego City
207 Mission Blvd Loring St to West Mission Bay Dr San Diego City
208 Mission Bay Dr Grand Av to Interstate 5 San Diego City
209 Mission Center Rd Camino del Rio North to Friars Rd San Diego City
210 Mission Gorge Rd Interstate 8 to Highridge Rd San Diego City
211 Montezuma Rd Fairmount Ave to El Cajon Blvd San Diego City
212 Morena Blvd Balboa Ave to Interstate 8 San Diego City
213 Navajo Rd Waring Rd to Fanita Dr San Diego City
214 Nimitz Blvd Interstate 8 to Harbor Dr San Diego City
49 44 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
215 North Harbor Dr Rosecrans St to Grape St San Diego City
216 North Torrey Pines Rd (S-21) Carmel Valley Rd to La Jolla Village Dr San Diego City
217 Ocean View Hills Parkway Interstate 805 to State Route 905 San Diego City
218 Otay Mesa Rd State Route 905 to State Route 125 San Diego City
219 Pacific Highway Sea World Dr to Harbor Dr San Diego City
220 Palm Ave State Route 75 to Interstate 805 San Diego City
221 Paradise Valley Rd Plaza Blvd to Meadowbrook Dr San Diego City
222 Park Blvd Imperial Ave to Adams Ave San Diego City
223 Picador Blvd Palm Ave to Interstate 905 San Diego City
224 Pomerado Rd Interstate 15 (north) to Interstate 15 (south) San Diego City
225 Poway Rd Interstate 15 to Springhurst Dr San Diego City
226 Qualcomm Way Intestate 8 to Friars Rd San Diego City
227 Rancho Bernardo Rd Interstate 15 to Summerfield Lane San Diego City
228 Rancho Carmel Dr Carmel Mountain Rd to Ted Williams Parkway San Diego City
229 Rancho Peñasquitos Blvd State Route 56 to Interstate 15 San Diego City
230 Regents Rd Genesee Ave to Clairemont Mesa Blvd San Diego City
231 Rosecrans St Interstate 8 to Canon St San Diego City
232 Ruffin Rd Kearny Villa Rd to Aero Dr San Diego City
233 Sabre Springs Parkway Ted Williams Parkway to Poway Rd San Diego City
234 San Ysidro Blvd Dairy Mart Rd to East Beyer Blvd San Diego City
235 Scripps Poway Parkway Interstate 15 to Springbrook Dr San Diego City
236 Sea World Dr West Mission Bay Dr to Morena Blvd San Diego City
237 Siempre Viva Rd Heritage Rd to State Route 905 San Diego City
238 Sorrento Valley Blvd Sorrento Valley Rd to Camino Santa Fe Ave San Diego City
239 Sports Arena Blvd Interstate 8 to Rosecrans St San Diego City
240 Sunset Cliffs Blvd Interstate 8 to West Mission Bay Dr San Diego City
241 Ted Williams Parkway Interstate 15 to Pomerado Rd San Diego City
242 Texas St Interstate 8 to University Ave San Diego City
243 Torrey Pines Rd Girard Ave to La Jolla Parkway San Diego City
244 University Ave State Route 163 to City of La Mesa San Diego City
245 Valencia Parkway Market St to Imperial Ave San Diego City
50 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 45 Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
246 Via de la Valle Jimmy Durante Blvd to El Camino Real San Diego City
247 Vista Sorrento Parkway Sorrento Valley Blvd to Carmel Mountain Rd San Diego City
248 Wabash Blvd 32nd St to Interstate 5 San Diego City
249 Washington St Pacific Highway to Park Blvd San Diego City
250 Waring Rd College Ave to Interstate 8 San Diego City
251 West Bernardo Dr Interstate 15 to Bernardo Center Dr San Diego City
252 West Mission Bay Dr Mission Blvd to Sunset Cliffs Blvd San Diego City
253 Woodman St State Route 54 to Imperial Ave San Diego City
254 Alpine Blvd Interstate 8/Dunbar Lane to Interstate 8/Willows Rd San Diego County
255 Avocado Blvd Dewitt Court to State Route 94 San Diego County
256 Bear Valley Parkway City of Escondido (north) to City of Escondido (south) San Diego County
257 Bonita Rd Interstate 805 to San Miguel Rd San Diego County
258 Borrego Springs/Yaqui Pass Rd Palm Canyon Dr (S-22) to State Route 78 San Diego County (S-3)
259 Bradley Ave Wing Ave to Winter Garden Blvd San Diego County
260 Buckman Springs/Sunrise Highway State Route 94 to State Route 79 San Diego County (S-1)
261 Buena Creek Rd South Santa Fe Ave to Twin Oaks Valley Rd San Diego County
262 Camino del Norte Rancho Bernardo Rd to City of San Diego San Diego County
263 Campo Rd Spring St to Sweetwater Springs/State Route 54 San Diego County
264 Citracado Parkway Greenwood Place to Interstate 15 San Diego County
265 Cole Grade Rd State Route 76 to Valley Center Rd San Diego County
266 Deer Springs Rd Twin Oaks Valley Rd to Interstate 15 San Diego County
267 Dehesa Rd Jamacha Rd to Harbison Canyon Rd San Diego County
268 Dehesa Rd* Harbison Canyon Rd to Sycuan Rd San Diego County
269 Del Dios Highway Via Rancho Parkway to Paseo de Delicias San Diego County
270 Dye Rd State Route 67 to San Vicente Rd San Diego County
271 Dye St State Route 67 to Dye Rd San Diego County
272 East Vista Way State Route 76 to City of Vista San Diego County
273 El Norte Parkway Rees Rd to Nordahl Rd San Diego County
274 Euclid Ave City of National City to City of National City San Diego County
275 Gamble Lane Eucalyptus Ave to City of Escondido San Diego County 51 46 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
276 Gopher Canyon Rd East Vista Way to Old Highway 395 San Diego County
277 Jamacha Rd City of El Cajon to State Route 94 San Diego County
278 Jamacha Rd State Route 125 to State Route 94 San Diego County
279 Keyes Rd (Southern Traffic Bypass) San Vicente Rd to State Route 78 (Julian Rd) San Diego County
280 Lake Jennings Park Rd State Route 67 to Interstate 8 San Diego County
281 Lake Wohlford Rd Valley Center Rd (north) to Valley Center Rd (south) San Diego County
282 Las Posas Rd City of San Marcos to Buena Creek Rd San Diego County
283 Lone Star Rd City of San Diego to Loop Rd San Diego County
284 Mapleview St State Route 67 to Lake Jennings Rd San Diego County
285 Mar Vista Drive City of Oceanside to City of Vista San Diego County
286 Melrose Dr City of Oceanside to City of Vista San Diego County
287 Mission Rd (S-13) Interstate 15 to State Route 76 San Diego County
288 Mountain Meadow Rd Interstate 15/Deer Springs Rd to Valley Center Rd San Diego County
289 Montezuma Valley/Palm Canyon State Route 79 to Imperial County Line San Diego County (S-22)
290 Nordahl Rd El Norte to City of San Marcos San Diego County
291 Old Highway 80 Buckman Springs Rd to Interstate 8 (In-ko-pah) San Diego County
292 Old Highway 80 State Route 79 to Sunrise Highway San Diego County
293 Old Highway 395/Champagne/ East Mission Rd to City of Escondido San Diego County North Centre City
294 Otay Lakes Rd Wueste Rd to State Route 94 San Diego County
295 Otay Mesa Rd City of San Diego to Loop Rd San Diego County
296 Paradise Valley Rd City of San Diego to Sweetwater Rd San Diego County
297 Paseo Delicias El Camino del Norte to Via de la Valle San Diego County
298 Rancho Bernardo Rd City of San Diego (west) to City of San Diego (east) San Diego County
299 San Felipe Rd/Overland Route County Route S-22 to Imperial County Line San Diego County (S-2)
300 San Vicente Rd/10th St State Route 67 (Main St) to Wildcat Canyon Rd San Diego County
301 Scripps Poway Parkway Sycamore Canyon Rd to State Route 67 San Diego County
302 Siempre Viva Rd City of San Diego to Loop Rd San Diego County
303 South Santa Fe Ave City of Vista to City of San Marcos San Diego County
304 Sunrise Highway State Route 79 to Interstate 8 San Diego County
52 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 47 Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
305 Sweetwater Rd (Bonita) Willow St to City of National City San Diego County
306 Sweetwater Rd (Spring Valley) Jamacha Blvd to Broadway San Diego County
307 Sweetwater Springs Blvd Jamacha Blvd to State Route 94 San Diego County
308 Valley Center Rd State Route 76 to City of Escondido San Diego County
309 Valley Center New Northern E to Cole Grade Rd to Old Highway 395 San Diego County W Rd
310 Via de la Valle City of San Diego to Paseo Delicias San Diego County
311 Via Rancho Parkway Del Dios Highway to City of Escondido San Diego County
312 Wildcat Canyon Rd* Mapleview St to San Vicente Rd San Diego County
313 Willow Glen Dr Jamacha Rd to Dehesa Rd San Diego County
314 Willows Rd Interstate 8 to Viejas Casino San Diego County
315 Winter Gardens Blvd State Route 67 to 2nd St San Diego County
316 Barham Dr Twin Oaks Valley Rd to Los Amigos San Marcos
317 Borden Rd Las Posas Rd to Woodland Parkway San Marcos
318 Buena Creek Rd Twin Oaks Valley Rd to Sunny Vista Lane San Marcos
319 Discovery St San Marcos Blvd to Twin Oaks Valley Rd San Marcos
320 Las Posas Rd West San Marcos Blvd to North City Limits San Marcos
321 Mission Rd Pacific St to Barham Dr San Marcos
322 San Elijo Rd Twin Oaks Valley Rd to Rancho Santa Fe Rd San Marcos
323 Rancho Santa Fe Rd Mission Rd to Melrose Dr San Marcos
324 San Marcos Blvd Business Park Dr to Mission Rd San Marcos
325 South Santa Fe Ave Smilax Rd to Pacific St San Marcos
326 Twin Oaks Valley Rd Deer Springs Rd to Questhaven Rd San Marcos
327 Woodland Parkway Barham Dr to El Norte Parkway San Marcos
328 Cuyamaca St Mission Gorge Rd to City of El Cajon Santee
329 Magnolia Ave Mast Blvd to Prospect Ave/State Route 67 Santee
330 Mast Blvd State Route 52 to Magnolia Ave Santee
331 Mission Gorge Rd City of San Diego to Magnolia Ave Santee
332 Woodside Ave Magnolia Ave to State Route 67 Santee
333 Coast Highway City of Encinitas to City of Del Mar Solana Beach
334 Lomas Santa Fe Ave Interstate 5 to Coast Highway Solana Beach
53 48 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Table M.13 (continued) Regional Arterials by Jurisdiction
Arterial Limits Jurisdiction
335 Bobier Dr North Melrose Dr to East Vista Way Vista
336 Cannon Rd (Mar Vista Dr) South Melrose Dr to State Route 78 Vista
337 East Vista Way Escondido Ave to County of San Diego Vista
338 Emerald Dr Sunset Dr to State Route 78 Vista
339 Escondido Ave State Route 78 to East Vista Way Vista
340 North Melrose Dr State Route 78 to Bobier Dr Vista
341 North Santa Fe Ave Main St to North Melrose Dr Vista
342 Olive Ave Emerald Dr to Vista Village Dr Vista
343 South Melrose Dr City of Carlsbad to State Route 78 Vista
344 South Santa Fe Ave Main St to County of San Diego Vista
345 Sycamore Ave South Santa Fe Ave to South Melrose Dr Vista
346 Thibodo Rd Mar Vista Dr (Cannon Rd) to Sycamore Ave Vista
347 Vista Village Dr State Route 78 to Escondido Ave Vista
348 West Vista Way Thunder Dr to Vista Village Dr Vista * Included in the Regional Arterial System contingent upon being designated as a four-lane arterial by the County of San Diego.
54 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 49 Map Area San Diego Region Pauma and Yuima Reservation Pala Reservation Camp Pendleton
5 15
Rincon 76 Reservation La Jolla Reservation
76
Oceanside Vista San Pasqual 78 San Reservation Marcos County of San Diego
Santa Ysabel Carlsbad Reservation Escondido
Mesa Grande 78 Reservation
78
Encinitas 67 5 Solana Beach Poway
Del Mar 56 Barona Reservation
15 Capitan Grande Reservation
805 Santee 52 67 52 8 5 San 125 Diego La Sycuan Mesa Reservation El Cajon 163 8
15
Figure M.1 94 Lemon Grove Regional Arterial 125 Jamul Indian Village System 282 October 2015 Coronado 54
Freeways and Highways National City Regional Arterials 125 94
75 805 MILES Chula Vista
KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 UNITED STATES Beach MEXICO 2-D 2 1-D 1
Tijuana, B.C. 2889 55 50 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Federal Guidance The Regional Plan considers projects and strategies that support the eight areas described in 23 U.S. §134(h). Many of these topics have been incorporated into the evaluation criteria as highlighted in the sections below. Additional consideration is included in the performance measures which are discussed in Appendix N.
Economic vitality Each project category includes a project cost-effectiveness criterion. The transit, highway, and connector cost-effectiveness criterion compare the project cost to the monetized benefits/dis-benefits of: fuel costs, greenhouse gas emissions, smog-forming pollutants, physical activity, safety, generalized delay costs (highway and connectors), as well as the value of jobs created by the construction of the project.
Transportation safety The evaluation of transportation safety is included in the Highway Corridor criteria where the percentage of collisions is compared against the statewide average. This approach is consistent with the California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). The value of the reduction or increase in injury and fatal accidents is also included in the cost- effectiveness criterion in the Highway Corridor, Transit Services, Freeway and HOV Connectors criteria, and is also incorporated into the Rail Grade Separations criteria.
Transportation security Transportation security is specifically addressed under the evaluation of proximity analysis of hazard areas (dam failure, earthquake, flood, landslide, liquefaction, tsunami, and wildfire), weighted by population and employment. This criterion is included under both the Highway Corridor and Transit Services project evaluation.
Accessibility and mobility Accessibility and mobility are incorporated into a number of the project evaluation criteria. Accessibility to jobs, school, recreational areas and beach, and Indian reservations is evaluated. Travel time savings is also included in the highway and connector criteria. The active transportation and transit criteria evaluate the system wide increase in the respective active transportation or transit trips resulting from the project.
Environment and quality of life Preservation of the environment is incorporated into a number of criteria including reduction in greenhouse gas and smog forming pollutants, and minimizing habitat and residential impacts. The value of greenhouse gas and smog forming pollutants emissions are also monetized and included in the cost-effectiveness criterion.
The criteria also awards points to projects which serve smart growth areas as identified in the Regional Comprehensive Plan. For the first time, a specific measure for public health was integrated into the evaluation criteria, which measures the increase in time engaged in moderate transportation-related physical activity. Access to jobs and amenities, cleaner air and preserved habitats, travel time savings, and physical activity all help to improve the quality of life in the San Diego region.
Integration and connectivity The project evaluation criteria evaluates enhanced integration of the transportation system for both people and freight. A goods movement criterion quantifies the total travel time savings for medium and heavy trucks for highway and freeway connector projects.
Multimodal integration of the transportation system for people is also evaluated by the project’s provision of access to other transit, highway, rail grade separation, or active transportation projects.
56 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 51 Promote efficient system management The Regional Plan strives to provide an efficient transportation system for the movement of people and goods. Criteria are included which quantify the travel time savings for people and goods and also award points for highway projects which include Managed Lanes, which can be optimally operated to serve transit, carpools, and, when capacity is available, single occupant vehicles (for a fee). The Regional Plan also funds projects and programs including Transportation Systems Management and other strategies to assure efficient management and operation of the transportation system. Additional information and funding levels for these and all transportation projects can be viewed in Chapter 3.
Preserve existing transportation system The Regional Plan funds projects and programs to assure the maintenance and operation of the transportation system. Additional information and funding levels for these and all transportation projects can be viewed in Chapter 3.
57 52 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Endnotes
1 Working with the San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan community-based organization network, “Disadvantaged Communities” are defined as low-income (200 percent of Federal Poverty Rate), minority, seniors (75+), and single-parent households with children under 18 years of age.
58 Appendix M :: Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings 53 AGENDA ITEM NO. 17-10-6 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OCTOBER 20, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED: DISCUSSION/ POSSIBLE ACTION
2018 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM File Number 1500000
Introduction Recommendation
The California Transportation Commission (CTC) The Transportation Committee is asked adopted the 2018 Fund Estimate for the State to discuss the proposed 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) at its Transportation Improvement Program meeting on August 16, 2017. The Fund Estimate is the (STIP) and either direct staff to return for set of revenue assumptions that are used to develop further action, or recommend that the the STIP covering the period FY 2019 to FY 2023. The Board of Directors approve the 2018 Fund Estimate adds about $2.2 billion of new submission of the proposed 2018 STIP capacity statewide over the five-year period and to the California Transportation includes FY 2016 STIP formula shares that were Commission. restored through the passage of Senate Bill 1 (Beall) earlier this year. Compared to the revised 2016 Fund Estimate which resulted in the need to reduce programming statewide, the 2018 STIP reflects a significant increase.
Discussion
The STIP is a five-year statewide program of projects that is updated by the CTC every two years. Funding for the STIP primarily is derived from the State Highway Account (SHA), which includes state and federal funds, with a limited amount of funding available through the Public Transportation Account (PTA), which includes only state funding. STIP funds are divided into two broad programs: the regional component, which comprises 75 percent of the funds; and the interregional component, known as the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP), which includes an interregional rail element and comprises the remaining 25 percent.
Within the regional component, the funds are divided 40 percent to North Counties and 60 percent to South Counties, and then distributed by a county share formula to each of the regions. The county share formula is based on two main factors, population and lane miles of maintained state highway. SANDAG, as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency, is responsible for submitting the programming request for the San Diego County share.
During each new STIP cycle, two new years are added and funding capacity is provided, allowing regions the opportunity to program new projects or to program later phases of work for existing projects already in the development process. In 2016 there were no specific county share targets due to severe fiscal constraint, and some programmed projects were reduced or delayed.
The 2018 STIP Fund Estimate provides a target for the San Diego region of $122.81 million, in addition to the $45.11 million currently programmed to existing projects in the 2016 STIP in FY 2019 through FY 2021. This results in total programming capacity of approximately $167.92 million for the FY 2019 through FY 2023 period. Typically, up to 5 percent of county shares may be used for planning, programming, and monitoring (PPM) efforts.
The 2018 STIP also provides the San Diego region with a programming target of approximately $19.15 million for an Advanced Project Development Element (APDE). The APDE is designed to help agencies complete environmental or design work on new projects to prepare them for future STIP funding or to compete for funds in other programs. Therefore, APDE funding is limited to only environmental and design phases of work and is not eligible for projects proposed for right-of-way or construction funding in the STIP. The APDE target does not count against the current county share target, but would count against future county share targets in subsequent STIP cycles.
Current 2016 STIP
The 2016 STIP, as shown in Table 1 below, programmed approximately $45.11 million from FY 2019 through FY 2021.
Table 1: Current 2016 STIP ($000s)
Project FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
1. I-5 North Coast Corridor $44,000 $44,000 2. Regional Planning, Programming, and $1,105 $1,105 Monitoring (PPM) TOTAL $1,105 $44,000 $45,105
Project Consideration
The proposed 2018 STIP continues to implement SANDAG Board practice (in effect since the 2004 STIP) that prioritizes projects for funding as follows:
1. Focus on projects that are ready to go to construction; 2. Focus on completing projects currently programmed in the STIP; and 3. Focus on TransNet Early Action Program projects.
2 In addition, the STIP Guidelines require that Caltrans and SANDAG meet and confer regarding project funding needs and priorities in development of the proposed STIP. During the consultation over the past couple of months with Caltrans District 11, staff evaluated the portfolio of projects in the TransNet program, Caltrans operational priorities for both the highway and rail programs, and the status of regional bike projects.
Other considerations include the total costs of potential projects and how competitive the projects likely are to be in competing for SB 1 or other funds. In addition, while a variety of project types are eligible for funding through the STIP, proposed projects must meet funding eligibility requirements specific to the STIP’s funding sources - the SHA and PTA. The SHA is a mixture of state and federal funds limited to surface transportation uses defined in the California’s Constitution. The PTA is the traditional fund source for transit, bicycle, and pedestrian projects.
The CTC has advised that PTA capacity statewide will be utilized over the 5-year 2018 STIP period exclusively for the ITIP. Caltrans Division of Rail is proposing to program approximately $30 million in this funding for construction of the San Onofre to Pulgas Phase 2 double-tracking project in the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) rail corridor. This funding would be supplementary to and not count against the San Diego 2018 STIP county share target.
In addition, the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program and Active Transportation Program each received a significant increase in funding under SB 1 to further transit and bicycle/pedestrian improvements. SANDAG traditionally has been successful under these programs and has several projects ready to compete for funds once the various calls for project nominations occur.
Proposed 2018 STIP
As stated previously, the 2018 STIP county share period target for SANDAG is $122.81 million and approximately $45.11 million currently is programmed between FY 2019 and 2021 in the 2016 STIP. This means an estimated $167.92 million is available for programming in the 2018 STIP. In addition, SANDAG’s APDE target is approximately $19.15 million and can be used to begin environmental work on projects with completed project initiation documents or to advance design on projects with environmental clearance. SANDAG has a PPM programming limitation of up to 5 percent of its new county share target between FY 2021 and FY 2023; however, because SANDAG traditionally has programmed less than 5 percent of its target for PPM, funds may be programmed in FY 2020 based on the PPM programming capacity from earlier county share periods.
Table 2 shows the staff recommendation for the 2018 STIP, which includes the full county share target of $167.9 million (including $5.52 million for PPM) and $19.2 million in APDE funding. The total proposed for the 2018 STIP is about $187.1 million.
3 Table 2: Proposed 2018 STIP Programming ($000s)
Project FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Total 1. I-5 North Coast Corridor 2 HOV • Design and Right of Way from Palomar to SR 78 $52,997 109,394 $162,391 • Construction from Birmingham to Palomar
2. Regional Planning, Programming, and 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 1,105 5,525 Monitoring (PPM) Project Target Subtotal $54,102 110,499 1,105 1,105 1,105 $167,916
APDE Projects FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Total 3. I-15/SR 78 HOV Direct Connector $7,000 $7,000 • Environmental 4. I-805/SR 52 Auxiliary Lanes 4,200 4,200 • Design 5. SR 94/SR 125 Connector 7,948 7,948 • Design APDE Subtotal $19,148 $19,148
TOTAL $73,250 $110,499 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $187,064
Summary of Proposed STIP Program
1. I-5 North Coast Corridor (NCC): This project proposes to fund design and right-of-way from Palomar Airport Road to State Route 78 (SR 78) and construction of 2 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes from Birmingham Drive to SR 78. Additional elements of work include soundwalls, bike paths, and required landscape mitigation. This proposal is consistent with action taken by the Board of Directors at its September 22, 2017, meeting, to increase the NCC budget by $384.9 million, with additional funding anticipated to be sought through the 2018 STIP and subsequent SB 1 formula and discretionary programs. Total proposed 2018 STIP funding is about $162.4 million.
2. Regional Planning, Programming, and Monitoring: Regions are eligible to program up to 5 percent for PPM. SANDAG historically has programmed less than the maximum PPM allowed in order to provide more funds to capital projects. Staff proposes to program $1.1 million annually for the FY 2020 to FY 2023 period, continuing the previously approved amount for FY 2019. Activities supported by these funds in the upcoming years include development, completion, and implementation of the Regional Transportation Plan. This amount represents 3.9 percent of county shares, an increase over the 3 percent previously programmed, and below the 5 percent limit. Total proposed 2018 STIP funding is about $5.5 million.
4 3. Advanced Project Development Element – Interstate 15/SR 78 HOV Direct Connector: This TransNet program project proposes to construct HOV connectors and operational improvements on Interstate 15 (I-15) and SR 78 to provide HOV system connectivity and reduce congestion. The project initiation document was completed in March 2015 and staff proposes to utilize the APDE to complete the environmental phase of work. The environmental document would evaluate express lanes on SR 78 from the connector to just west of the Twin Oaks Valley overcrossing, as well as auxiliary lanes, to help relieve congestion at this location and enhance operations of the I-15 managed lanes. The total estimate and proposed 2018 STIP APDE funding for the environmental document is $7 million. The total cost estimate for the project ranges from approximately $238 million to $318 million.
4. Advanced Project Development Element – Interstate 805/State Route 52 Auxiliary Lanes: This operational improvement project encompasses one northbound and one southbound auxiliary lane between Governor Drive and the Interstate 805 (I-805)/ State Route 52 interchange to alleviate peak period delays in this heavily congested corridor. The project was environmentally cleared as part of the TransNet I-805 North project in December 2010 and staff proposes to utilize the APDE to complete the design phase of work. The total cost estimate for the project is approximately $41 million and the estimate and proposed 2018 STIP APDE funding for the design phase is $4.2 million. Looking forward, this project potentially could qualify for State Highway Operation and Protection Program funding for construction.
5. Advanced Project Development Element – State Route 94/State Route 125 Connector: This TransNet program operational improvement project proposes to construct a freeway-to- freeway connector from southbound State Route 125 to eastbound State Route 94. Currently traffic must use local streets to complete this move, causing traffic at local intersections to exceed capacity during peak hours. The project was environmentally cleared in December 2015 and staff proposes to utilize the APDE to complete the design phase of work. The total cost estimate for the project is approximately $104 million and the estimate and proposed 2018 STIP APDE funding for the design phase is approximately $7.9 million.
Social Equity
SANDAG, as a recipient of federal funds, is obligated to assure nondiscrimination in all of its programs and activities; that no programs administered or projects implemented by SANDAG lead to discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, or income status. For the projects identified for STIP funding, including APDE, the environmental phase of work included or will include analyses to ensure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and other relevant state and federal laws. At this point, all but one of the projects proposed for funding have undergone the analysis and it has been determined that none of them will result in disproportionately high and adverse effects to low-income or minority populations. The project that has yet to complete the environmental phase is the I-15/SR 78 HOV Direct Connector project.
Any disproportionately high and adverse effects that may occur as a result of the proposed I-15/SR 78 HOV Direct Connector project on minority and low-income populations would be identified during the environmental phase of that project and addressed.
5 Next Steps
The 2018 STIP proposal would program funds primarily in the first two years of the STIP period. Once all regions have submitted their STIP proposals, the CTC will determine how much, if any, would need to be shifted from the proposed programmed years. The CTC may request that the programming proposal be delayed to better fit the statewide programming capacity. SANDAG staff will work with CTC staff regarding the I-5 NCC in order to maintain the project’s schedule.
The deadline to submit STIP proposals to the CTC is December 15, 2017. CTC staff recommendations will be released in spring 2018 with the STIP scheduled for adoption in March 2018. Substantive changes to the programming recommendation would be brought back to the Transportation Committee and Board for further discussion and approval.
JOSÉ A. NUNCIO TransNet Department Director
Key Staff Contact: Dawn Vettese, (619) 595-5346, [email protected]
6 Proposed Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios Development Process Transportation Committee Item 5 | October 20, 2017
Feedback Received
• Transportation Committee – Requested additional discussion about the network development process – Requested the lists of ranked projects from the 2015 Regional Plan – Provided feedback on the unconstrained transportation maps and provided initial feedback on performance measures • Regional Planning Committee – Supported moving forward with the unconstrained network and 2015 Regional Plan lists of ranked projects – Provided initial feedback on performance measures
2 2019 Regional Plan
Transportation Committee Item 5 | October 20, 2017 1 2019 Regional Plan Development Process
Fall 2017 / Early 2018Spring 2018 Summer 2018 Spring / Fall 2019 Network Development (All Modes)
Define Unconstrained Network Apply Performance Measures Vision, Active Goals, and Transportation Policy and Draft/Final Objectives Roadways Revenue Evaluate Select Preferred 2019 RP/SCS, Constrained Revenue Transportation Air Quality Scenarios Constrained Scenario 2050 Scenarios Conformity, Regional Evaluate and EIR Growth Technologies Forecast Revenue and Cost Projections Draft/Final RHNA
Ongoing Public Involvement
3 2019 Regional Plan
Vision and Goals
4 2019 Regional Plan
Transportation Committee Item 5 | October 20, 2017 2 Scenario Development Based on Revenue Constraints
Network Other factors: #1 Network efficiency Ranked lists of projects by Project Unconstrained Evaluation readiness Network mode (transit, Network criteria highway, etc.) Types of #2 1.‐‐ 2.‐‐ 3.‐‐ funding available Policy considerations Network #3
5 2019 Regional Plan
Network Selection Based on Performance Measures
Network #1
Board selects UnconstrainedNetwork Performance Multimodal preferred revenue Network#2 measures constrained Scenario
Network #3
6 2019 Regional Plan
Transportation Committee Item 5 | October 20, 2017 3 Proposed Network Development Approach
• Start with existing unconstrained transportation network • Start with current lists of ranked projects – Transit rankings, Managed Lane/highway rankings, etc. • Update network performance measures
7 2019 Regional Plan
Network Development Process
• Incorporation of new technologies • TransNet ten‐year review – Look back – Look forward • Updated greenhouse gas reduction targets
8 2019 Regional Plan
Transportation Committee Item 5 | October 20, 2017 4 Next Steps
• Early 2018 – Provide input on revenue forecast options – Provide input on transportation technologies white paper – Provide input on performance measures and revenue constrained transportation scenarios • Summer 2018 – Provide input on the preferred revenue constrained transportation scenario
9 2019 Regional Plan
Recommendation
The Transportation Committee is asked to recommend that the Board of Directors accept the proposed process to develop the Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios for use in the development of 2019 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan, including the existing Unconstrained Transportation Network, project evaluation criteria, and project rankings from the 2015 Regional Plan.
10 2019 Regional Plan
Transportation Committee Item 5 | October 20, 2017 5 SDForward.com
11
Transportation Committee Item 5 | October 20, 2017 6 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
RTIP Quick Guide 2016 “What is the process?” This quick guide provides information on how the public can get involved in the transportation Any projects funded with Local/Private Federal project funding and development process. The focus is on projects that are required to be listed in 17% 29% the Regional Transportation Improvement Program or RTIP, which is compiled and approved for the San Diego region by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). federal, state or TransNet 2016 RTIP by Funding Source HOW DOES A PROJECT GET IN THE RTIP? funds are required to be What is the San Diego Association of Projects in the Regional Plan are included in the RTIP once a commitment is made to fully fund a phase of work. The Governments (SANDAG)? agency responsible for the project contacts SANDAG to programmed in the RTIP program the funds in the RTIP. Agencies that add their SANDAG is a public agency that serves as the forum for projects in the RTIP include SANDAG, the 18 cities, the County regional decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus; The graphic at right illustrates the split of funding for of San Diego, as well as the transit operators, and District 11 TransNet State makes strategic plans; obtains and allocates resources; projects included in the 2016 RTIP. of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 31% 23% plans, engineers, and builds public transportation, operates toll roads and provides information on a broad Local/Transit Projects: Local jurisdictions and transit range of topics pertinent to the region’s quality of life. operators propose projects to their respective council or board for approval of project scope, schedule and cost. SANDAG is governed by a Board of Directors composed RTIP DETAILS RTIP FUNDING Once approved, the project is then submitted to SANDAG of mayors, council members, and county supervisors The RTIP reflects a funding period of five years and Any projects funded with federal, state or TransNet funds for inclusion in the RTIP. from each of the region’s 19 local governments. Policy includes anticipated schedules and costs for funds are required to be programmed in the RTIP. Funding Advisory Committees assist the Board of Directors in committed to projects. Only phases of work (preliminary assumptions are generally based upon: SANDAG/Caltrans Regional Projects: Projects are carrying out the agency’s work program. The Board of engineering, right-of-way, and construction) that are fully developed, evaluated and ranked as part of the SANDAG Directors is assisted by a professional staff of planners, funded can be included in the RTIP. The RTIP is adopted Long Range Transportation Development Plan process. engineers, and research specialists. every two years in order to add new projects, complete The Regional Plan, including its Sustainable Communities projects, and make any changes to scope, cost, or phasing Strategy (SCS), is built on an integrated set of public SANDAG is the federally-designated Metropolitan of projects. This process is referred to as an RTIP Update, policies, strategies, and investments to maintain, manage, Planning Organization (MPO) and state-designated which occurs every even-numbered year. and improve the transportation system so that it meets the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for diverse needs of the San Diego region through 2050. the San Diego region. The RTIP must be revenue constrained over the five year period, meaning that reasonably-expected revenues must RTIP Funding Transportation projects that propose to add more traffic be able to fund the projects listed. RTIP revenues consist capacity must be consistent with air quality conformity generally of taxes, tolls, or fees, and include local, regional, WHAT IS THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION standards in order to be included in the RTIP. Additionally, state, and federal funds. Authorized or appropriated IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OR RTIP? an analysis of multimodal strategies and alternatives for levels of federal and state funding SANDAG, as the MPO and the RTPA, is required by state and corridors is required by all project sponsors when an from current legislation federal laws to develop and adopt a Regional Transportation increase in single occupant vehicle capacity is proposed. Air RTIP CHANGES Improvement Program (RTIP). quality conformity refers to meeting standards in the Clean The RTIP may be amended or changed after it is adopted. Air Act Amendments of 1990 which requires that projects SANDAG generally amends the RTIP on a quarterly basis Reasonable projections of future The RTIP is a multi-year, multi-modal program of major included in the RTIP do not delay attainment of air quality to accommodate changes requested by local jurisdictions, federal and state funding assuming a transportation projects in the San Diego region proposed standards, worsen existing violations, or cause new violations. transit operators or Caltrans. RTIP amendments are posted continuation of current funding levels for development and construction in the near-term. These projects may only be added to the RTIP during the on the SANDAG website for public comment prior to Transportation projects funded with federal, state and biennial update or during an amendment that will include approval and public comment is encouraged. the local half-cent sales tax program (TransNet) must be an analysis of air quality conformity, and project information The most current revenue forecasts included in the RTIP. Locally funded projects of regional must be consistent with the Regional Plan. Reasons for amendments vary. Project costs or schedules for TransNet, the local transportation significance must also be included in the RTIP. may change, there may be a change in anticipated revenues, Projects that do not increase capacity of the surface or project priorities. Amendments may be used to mark sales tax program The RTIP covers five fiscal years and incrementally transportation system and are exempt from inclusion in the projects as complete or delayed when there is no funding implements San Diego Forward; The Regional Plan region’s air quality conformity model may be added to the remaining in the period covered by the RTIP. (Regional Plan), which is the long-range transportation plan RTIP at any time. The planning and for the San Diego region. The Regional Plan was approved by programming documents of the the SANDAG Board of Directors on October 9, 2015. local transportation providers
2016 SAN DIEGO’S REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP) “What is the process?” This quick guide provides information on how the public can get involved in the transportation Any projects funded with Local/Private Federal project funding and development process. The focus is on projects that are required to be listed in 17% 29% the Regional Transportation Improvement Program or RTIP, which is compiled and approved for the San Diego region by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). federal, state or TransNet 2016 RTIP by Funding Source HOW DOES A PROJECT GET IN THE RTIP? funds are required to be What is the San Diego Association of Projects in the Regional Plan are included in the RTIP once a commitment is made to fully fund a phase of work. The Governments (SANDAG)? agency responsible for the project contacts SANDAG to programmed in the RTIP program the funds in the RTIP. Agencies that add their SANDAG is a public agency that serves as the forum for projects in the RTIP include SANDAG, the 18 cities, the County regional decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus; The graphic at right illustrates the split of funding for of San Diego, as well as the transit operators, and District 11 TransNet State makes strategic plans; obtains and allocates resources; projects included in the 2016 RTIP. of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 31% 23% plans, engineers, and builds public transportation, operates toll roads and provides information on a broad Local/Transit Projects: Local jurisdictions and transit range of topics pertinent to the region’s quality of life. operators propose projects to their respective council or board for approval of project scope, schedule and cost. SANDAG is governed by a Board of Directors composed RTIP DETAILS RTIP FUNDING Once approved, the project is then submitted to SANDAG of mayors, council members, and county supervisors The RTIP reflects a funding period of five years and Any projects funded with federal, state or TransNet funds for inclusion in the RTIP. from each of the region’s 19 local governments. Policy includes anticipated schedules and costs for funds are required to be programmed in the RTIP. Funding Advisory Committees assist the Board of Directors in committed to projects. Only phases of work (preliminary assumptions are generally based upon: SANDAG/Caltrans Regional Projects: Projects are carrying out the agency’s work program. The Board of engineering, right-of-way, and construction) that are fully developed, evaluated and ranked as part of the SANDAG Directors is assisted by a professional staff of planners, funded can be included in the RTIP. The RTIP is adopted Long Range Transportation Development Plan process. engineers, and research specialists. every two years in order to add new projects, complete The Regional Plan, including its Sustainable Communities projects, and make any changes to scope, cost, or phasing Strategy (SCS), is built on an integrated set of public SANDAG is the federally-designated Metropolitan of projects. This process is referred to as an RTIP Update, policies, strategies, and investments to maintain, manage, Planning Organization (MPO) and state-designated which occurs every even-numbered year. and improve the transportation system so that it meets the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for diverse needs of the San Diego region through 2050. the San Diego region. The RTIP must be revenue constrained over the five year period, meaning that reasonably-expected revenues must RTIP Funding Transportation projects that propose to add more traffic be able to fund the projects listed. RTIP revenues consist capacity must be consistent with air quality conformity generally of taxes, tolls, or fees, and include local, regional, WHAT IS THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION standards in order to be included in the RTIP. Additionally, state, and federal funds. Authorized or appropriated IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OR RTIP? an analysis of multimodal strategies and alternatives for levels of federal and state funding SANDAG, as the MPO and the RTPA, is required by state and corridors is required by all project sponsors when an from current legislation federal laws to develop and adopt a Regional Transportation increase in single occupant vehicle capacity is proposed. Air RTIP CHANGES Improvement Program (RTIP). quality conformity refers to meeting standards in the Clean The RTIP may be amended or changed after it is adopted. Air Act Amendments of 1990 which requires that projects SANDAG generally amends the RTIP on a quarterly basis Reasonable projections of future The RTIP is a multi-year, multi-modal program of major included in the RTIP do not delay attainment of air quality to accommodate changes requested by local jurisdictions, federal and state funding assuming a transportation projects in the San Diego region proposed standards, worsen existing violations, or cause new violations. transit operators or Caltrans. RTIP amendments are posted continuation of current funding levels for development and construction in the near-term. These projects may only be added to the RTIP during the on the SANDAG website for public comment prior to Transportation projects funded with federal, state and biennial update or during an amendment that will include approval and public comment is encouraged. the local half-cent sales tax program (TransNet) must be an analysis of air quality conformity, and project information The most current revenue forecasts included in the RTIP. Locally funded projects of regional must be consistent with the Regional Plan. Reasons for amendments vary. Project costs or schedules for TransNet, the local transportation significance must also be included in the RTIP. may change, there may be a change in anticipated revenues, Projects that do not increase capacity of the surface or project priorities. Amendments may be used to mark sales tax program The RTIP covers five fiscal years and incrementally transportation system and are exempt from inclusion in the projects as complete or delayed when there is no funding implements San Diego Forward; The Regional Plan region’s air quality conformity model may be added to the remaining in the period covered by the RTIP. (Regional Plan), which is the long-range transportation plan RTIP at any time. The planning and for the San Diego region. The Regional Plan was approved by programming documents of the the SANDAG Board of Directors on October 9, 2015. local transportation providers
2016 SAN DIEGO’S REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP) How we work.
SANDAG LONG TERM RTIP NEW PROJECT REGIONAL PLAN PROGRAMMING IMPLEMENTATION
Project idea is approved by The Regional Plan is developed The Regional Transportation Project owner is able to local authorities such as a city every four years. The Regional Improvement Program (RTIP) request funding and move council, the County Board of Plan, including its Sustainable identifies specific near-term forward with implementation. Supervisors or transit operator. Communities Strategy (SCS), projects over a five-year SANDAG allows amendments All RTIP projects must be is built on an integrated set period to move the region to the RTIP to add or modify publically noticed at this of public policies, strategies, toward its transportation projects once they are level either through a public and investments to maintain, vision. The RTIP includes underway. meeting or public hearing. manage, and improve the all surface transportation transportation system so that projects for federal, state it meets the diverse needs and TransNet funded projects. of the San Diego region Projects are programmed through 2050. once approved by the respective council or board.
HOW CAN THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATE? WHERE CAN THE PUBLIC GET MORE INFORMATION? The Regional Plan includes regionally significant projects Resources: that are ultimately placed in the RTIP. Public involvement The Regional Transportation Improvement Program is a major component in the development of the Regional www.sandag.org/rtip or https://projecttrak.sandag.org/ Plan to deliberate the merits of transportation projects. San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan The Regional Plan is updated every four years, with the http://www.sdforward.com/regionalplan most recent update occurring in October 2015. The next update to the Regional Plan is expected in fall 2019. The SANDAG Public Participation Plan public can get involved early by participating in community www.sandag.org/ppp planning forums or public meetings, providing comments on specific projects, or following the work of local agency Alphabet Soup on Transportation Funding boards or councils. http://www.sandag.org/uploads/publicationid/ publicationid_1236_5646.pdf n Stay informed regarding transportation projects Contacts: planned for your community Project Manager – Michelle Smith [email protected] n Attend public meetings Media Inquiries – Helen Gao n Get involved in community based organizations [email protected]
SANDAG main number – n Follow the work of your city council, the County 619.699.1900 TTY 619.699.1905 Board of Supervisors or local transit operator n Get involved with the San Diego Forward; SANDAG SANDAGregion The Regional Plan process @SANDAG www.sandag.org LO-ÀO-L7 Transportation Committee Meeting
1.0 Roads, Rail, High-Speed Rail, Bridges, Busses, and Bicycle lssues
The Global lnfrastructure Cooperative Conference meet in the week of September 4,2OI7 in a spirit of cooperation and commerce in Seoul, South Korea. Some 8O-agencies from 46-countries came to talk about infrastructure project needs with Korean engineers and contractors. 6-trans-national development groups, including the Asian lnfrastructure lnvestment Bank and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development were also in the group.
Ref: ENR, 9-t8-L7 pp.4
. Article on the L,}7O-ft, Salesforce Tower in San Francisco, showing its foundation and piling system that was designed to protect the surrounding transit centers foundations from interacting, by going down to bed rock.
Ref: ENR, September L8,2017 pp.24-3L
L.L Roads
San Diego will pay 512.5E6 for the death of a family's infant that was killed in an unmarked and obstructed intersection and the driver that did it will pay $S.Sf 0 from the accident at Catalina Boulevard and Canon Street. Many complaints were sent to the city over the issues before the accident.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-1.4-L7 pp. B1 & 812
1.1-.6 Fatalities
Traffic fatalities in the U.S. went up 5.6%To37,46L in 2016-the highest since 2007, says NHTSA. There was an 8.4%oincrease in 20L5 over 20L4. Total vehicle miles traveled-VMT-increased2.2%in 20L6 with fatality rate growth of 2.8% to 1.8-deaths/100E6-VMT.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 1"0-8-L7 pp. A24
1.2 Rail
A trend that seems to describe President Trump's future of Railroad regulations, is likened to following Ayn Rand, an émigré from the Soviet Union following, the Regan Administration, Alan Greenspan, and Rand's book, Atlas Shrugged, published in 1957 advocating less government regulation and more powerful free market ideology.
Ref: Railway Age August 2Ot7 pp. t5
L.2.L lnterstate Freight Systems
President Trump's nominee of Ronald L. Batory for the Federal Railroad Administrator was recommended to the Senate by their Committee on Science and Transportation on August 2,2017.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2017 pp.6
. Groups from Wl, lL, and lN have asked the STB to reject an application from Great Lakes Basin Transportation lnc. to build a new 261,-mi line from Milton, Wl to LaPorte County, lN, bypassing congestion
I in Chicago. The goal is to connect the 6-Class I RRs around Chicago by its founder Frank Patton.2 The project would be privately funded at a cost of 52.8E9.
2Google.com: great lakes basin transportation inc.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2OL7 pp.13
. Crews broke ground on August L6,20L7 on a new empty-container yard at the Port of Houston that is funded with a P3. Terminal Link Texas, is building the 25-acre empty-container yard.
Ref: ENR, 4111.,2OL7 pp. 19
. lntermodal accounts for 40% of UP's traffic with 71E3-containers/wk and BNSF handles 93E3- containers/wk.
Ref: Trains, October 2Ot7 pp.4
. Update on intermodal trains that was started in 1961 and is a successor to the trailer-on-flatcar standard used for 2O-years. They are using 125-ton articulated well cars now, and some track is not up to standards for the increased weight loads.
Ref: Trains, October 2OI7 pp.26-33
1..2.Lt Locomotives
After 106-years of producing locomotives for the world, the final locomotive will roll out of GE's Lawrence, PA plant, east of Erie, PA in 2018. GE opened a new locomotive factory in Fort Worth, TX in 2013. Chinese competition is cutting into GE's global market share. Union workers at the PA plant make S30/hr and non-union workers in Fort Worth are less costly. The plant in PA will continue to build prototypes, propulsion systems, alternators, mining equipment, grid blower motors, controls, remanufacturing, and spare parts for services, some under mining industries equipment.
Ref: Trains, October 2OI7 pp.6
L2.t.2 Positive Train Control-PTC-
The Federal Railroad Administration has authorized lnitiation of Revenue Service Demonstration operations for Positive Train Control on the North County Transit District's Coaster trains, including revenue-passenger-carrying trains, on the San Diego subdivision.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2OI7 pp. t2
L.2.2 Construction Materials
Article on what railroads are doing to prepare for winter conditions between December and March, by BNSF's Ross Lane: on gas-fired hot-air switch heaters, keeping prime-mover coolant heated at 90-120oF, battery wraps to maintain optimum cold cranking amps, Power House-engine pre-heat/idle- reduction systems, and rotary snowplows update, with a new NEXSYS lll-l module snowplow, that can operate at 5-L0-mph, exceeding the old speed of 2-mph pace.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2017 pp.24-28
2 . Article on the FTA-NYCT that will assess the performance of vehicles and tracks on the Flushing Line, for wheel-rail interaction in operating conditions, to improve safety, energy efficiency, asset management, and resiliency.
Ref: Trains, October 2017 pp.38-45
1.2.3 Car Types
The American Railway Car lnstitute says orders for railcars was up in the 2nd-Q-2077: non-tank units-L3,207, covered hoppers-9,233, medium-cube covered hoppers-5,5L5, large-cube and small covered hoppers-84L & 497 respectively, and tank cars-4,458. The industry's backlog is now 66,561- railca rs.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2OI7 pp.6, L6 and 33-35
. RailRunner-U.S.-based intermodalfreight company, launched its first service in Europe on July 3L,2017 with daily trains between Bratislava and Braunschweig. The initial phase will use conventional intermodal cars to carry crane-able trailers, swap bodies, and containers. ln 201-9 RailRunner will introduce its Terminal Anywhere Technology, that enables over-the road trailers to be loaded onto RailRunner bogies that takes only 2-minutes.
The CT DOT awarded a 545E6, S-year contract to TASI/ACI to operate and manage service on the CTrail Hartford Line and will be operational in May 201"8 for service between New Haven, Hartford, and Springfield, with connections to Metro-North, Shoreline East, and Amtrak. There will be 17-roundtrip trains between New Haven and Harford operating each weekday, with L2 continuing to Springfield. There will also be l-3-round trips on weekends between New Haven and Hartford.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2017 pp.8
1.2.3.3 Box Cars
Article on the introduction of Greenbrier's new line of Dura-Max Open Top Hoppers that began production in summer 201-7,
Ref: Railway Age, August 2017 pp. 18
L.2.4 Urban Light Rail Systems
Maryland's Purple Line, light-rail project has begun construction.
Ref: ENR, September 4/tt,2OI7 pp. 14
. A Regional Plan Association, is calling for faster action on several proposals to fix the aging and inadequate transit system between the Northeast Corridor rail line, between NJ and Manhattan that will include a new Hudson River tunnel.
Ref: ENR, September 4/L1,2017 pp. 18
. A special session of the Hawaii legislature, has averted a stoppage for Honolulu's light-rail project, by enacting a 52.4E9 funding that is hoped to complete the 20-mi, 58E6 system that is 6-years behind schedule.
3 Ref: ENR, September t8,2OL7 pp. 18
. Article on passenger train "priority" over their own revenue-producing traffic, on shared track that are making the priority times less, and cutting off some passenger service for longer times making passenger service inefficient and undesirable.
Ref: Trains, October 2OL7 pp.22
l-.2.6 lnternational Freight Systems
Global mining company Rio Tinto, says AutoHaul@-the 5518E6 funded automation of its Western Australia, Pilbara iron ore network, is operational, with 20% of train-miles now operating in autonomous mode, albeit with locomotive engineers, managing safety and reliability systems. The system includes autonomous trucks, drilling, and investments in electronically controlled pneumatic breaking systems. Pilbara iron ore shipments reached 77JE6-Ions in the 2nd-Q-2Ot7 and totalvolumesfor2OlT are forecast to reach 330E6-tons.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2OL7 pp. L4
1-.3 High-Speed Rail-HSR-
1.3.1 High Speed
Article on progress of the 53-year engineering efforts of High-Speed Rail-HSR-systems-Japan started with it first Shinhansen in L964. The world has 200-mph HSR systems operating now. ln 2009 President Obama earmarked 58.089 for economic recovery and demand for HSR exploded with 150- applications for projects, that only started the ball rolling, except for the Chicago-St. Louis higher-speed project.
AllAboard Florida's Brightline is expected in service in2Ot7, with trainsets from Siemens, and Cummins- powered higher speed, Charger diesel-electric locomotives. Charger locomotives capable of 125-mph are being built for HrSR contracts, but the cars are waiting for a fix, involving manufacturing problems. Alstom is building the next generation Northeast Corridor trains called Avelia Liberty, to replace the 20-year-old Acela Express-the closest the U.S. has come to HSR, with a S2.45E9 program. lt will mimic Alstom's TGV, consisting of two compact power cars and 9-passenger cars with 3-car expansion capability.
The Bullet Train is on its first leg in CA. The California High-Speed Rail Authority-CHSRA-qualified 5- groups from Europe and Asia to bid on its "early train operator" tender and the successful bidder will work with CHSRA on design, development, and procurement of high-speed rail service with a franchise agreement. The participating groups are: China HSR ETO Consortium; DB lnternational US with German Rail, Alternate Concepts, and HDR; FS First Rail Group; Renfe and Spanish infrastructure manager Adif; and Stagecoach Group, Britain and U.S. Coach USA Administration. lndirectly connected to the HRS, is the Caltrain Peninsula Corridor Electrification project to electricity the San Francisco-San Jose Corridor, with high-performance Stadler Rail, trainsets for upgraded service for 202L completion. ln Canada, premier Kathleen Wynne says they will move ahead with a high-speed railroad between Toronto and Windsor, with 2-options: with dedicated electric system or a shared track system on
4 dedicated rights-of-way system, with speeds of up to 155-mph, using a benefit cost ratio to determine which is best economically.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2OI7 pp.29-31.
1.3.3 Hyperloop Transport System
Update on the Hyperloop One, that will change its name to Virgin Hyperloop One, with investment from Richard Branson's Virgin Group that could build a system to move passengers or cargo between Los Angeles and Las Vegas in 30-min. lt could be reality in 2-4-years with government approval.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-1-3-17 pp. C1 & C4
1.4 Bridges
l-.4.3 State, County, and City
The NH, DOT began rush inspections of 16-detioring bridges on September 6,2OL7, after a large piece of concrete fell from a Route 102 bridge onto moving traffic on l-93 in Derry, NH.
Ref: ENR, September 18,2Ot7 pp.7
2.0 Port and Military lssues
2.L Ports
2.L.1- Container Ships
Trump has been asked to wave the Jones Act for cargo into Puerto Rico to get supplies and goods to the island faster at a lower cost after the Hurricanes. Trump says there are enough U.S. ships available to do the job.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-28-17 pp.A2
2.1.4 U.S.
The San Diego tourism and business leaders are working aggressively on a renewed effort to finance a convention center expansion with hotel room tax in the June election.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-26-17 pp. C1 & Ca o Fire caused damage to most of the interior of the 1-30-ft Norton Sound, near Seaport Village. The fishing and research ship was not occupied.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-30-17 pp. 81 & 84
. Sea Machines Robotics' is developing methodology to facilitate self-driving boats in Boston Harbor. Other marine projects working on autonomous technology are in Norway, Japan, and Amsterdam.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-1.4-L7 pp.Ca
. Brigantine Restaurant Group's vision for the replacement of Anthony's Fish Grotto, won approval on l-0- LO-17 for a 40-year lease, clearing the way for the start of construction in early 20L8.
5 Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-11--1"7 pp. C1 & C4
. People are leaving boats to the fate of the ocean in the Zuniga Shoal off Coronado.
Ref: The San Diego U-T L0-L2-17 pp. 81 & 83
2.1.5 lnternational
A retired U.S. Army Colonel, faces a federal bribery and money-laundering charge connected to a Sg+¡0 port project in Haiti, by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Ref: ENR, September L8,2OL7 pp.t7
2.L.6 Maintenance Operations
Article on Houston's risks from Hurricanes and other economic destruction natural events from nature.
Ref: Mechanical Engineering, September 2OL7 pp. 36-4L
2.2 Military
The Pentagon is injecting S++Oe0 more into missile defense, to expand its missile interceptors to counter North Korea's goal to be able to hit the U.S. The funding will add to the 58.2E9 already in the m issile project funding.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-5-17 pp.A7
. Miramar Marine Corps Air Station will start building a micro grid funded by S20E6 from Congress, to cut electric costs.
Ref: The San Diego U-f 9-28-17 pp. 8L3
2.2.1Ships and Planes
The Navy launched the USS Rafael Peralta, a destroyer powered by 4-GE 1M2500 marine gas turbines, that operate in temperatures of -40 to 120 oF. The 1M2500 operates a combined gas turbine and gas turbine COGAG configuration. The Navy has taken delivery of over 700 1M2500 engines operat¡ng aboard surface combatants such as frigates and destroyers. The USS Rafael Peralta is the first to be built by General Dynamics/Bath lron Works in ME. Worldwide more than 1,450 GE gas turbines ranges from 6,000 to 70,27S-shaft hours power 4.5 to 52-MW served on 600-naval ships for 100-military ship programs from cruisers to aircraft carriers.
Ref: Mechanical Engineering, October2Ot7 pp. 26
2.2.2 lnter nationa I lssues
Kim Jong-un put his sister, Kim Yo Jong in the powerful political bureau of the Working Party and closer to the center of leadership. She is some 30-yers old and was promoted during a weekend of festivities, celebrating the 72th Anniversary of the founding of the Worker's Party. A top Korean analyst at the ClA, Yong-Suk Lee-deputy Assistant Director of the CIA's Korean Mission Center and professor at Stanford University, said the U.S. Gov. should be ready for another North Korean provocation this week,
6 saying the U.S. should "stand by your phones" it's been 2O-years since Kim Jong ll, Kim Jong-un's father was elected General Secretary of the Workers Party.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-9-17 pp.A3
. Dr. Yong Suk Lee from Stanford University, working for the ClA, says Kim Jong-Un is not crazy, but rational and wants to achieve legitimacy and brooder freedom of action on the Korean Peninsula.
Ref:The Washington Times, October 4,2017 and Google.com:Yong Suk Lee. o North Korean Foreign Minister Yo Yong Ho, suggested Kim Jong Un was considering testing a hydrogen bomb over the Pacific on a Hwasong-1.2 or Hwasong-L4 ICBM and blow it up a few hundred kilometers above the Pacific Ocean, says Yang Uk, a senior researcher at the Korean Defense and Security Forum in Seoul. China detonated a device in L980, says the lnternational Atomic Energy Agency. The U.S. tested a nuclear-tipped ballistic missile with a live warhead fired from a submarine in the Pacific Ocean in 1962. China tested a missile that exploded over its Lop Nur test site in West China in 1966. North Korea tested 6-nuclear devices to date-all underground, says Vipin Narang at MlT.
Ref: Asia Journal, Week of 9-29-IO-5,2OL7 pp.tL
. Ri ll-bae commanding officer of the Red Guards in North Korea say they are waiting for the right time to have a final battle with the U.S., the evil empire, and remove the U.S. from the world.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-25-L7 pp.412
.SOYo of 1-,500-people polled in a survey believeTrump will attack North Korea and45% believe North Korea willattack the U.S.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-28-L7 pp.A3
. Discussions on damages to North Korea from sanctions put on it by the international community, Polandl is the only country in the E.U still hosting North Korean workers, and most are in China or Russia. lGoogle.com: north korea-poland relations
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-30-17 pp. 8
. The U.N. is considering a case of human rights abuses in the Crimea, since reclaiming the territory 3- years ago by Russia.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 9-26-17 pp.A3
. Jon Huntsman is the new U.S. ambassador to Moscow and he was the former UT Gov. and Ambassador to China.
Ref: The San Diego U-T L0-4-17 pp.A3
. GeneralJohn W. Nicholson Jr., U.S. Commander in Afghanistan, vowed "a tidal wave of air power is on the horizon" in the war against the Taliban insurgents to bring an end to them. President Ashraf Ghani watched as a new Black Hawk descended and hovered over the runway of the airport.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-8-L7 pp.A5
7 . Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan, called Monday for an early election in November2017. Tokyo's popular governor Yuriko Koike introduced a new Natural Party on the momentum built over the summer, when the party she founded drubbed Abe's Liberal Democrats in an election in Tokyo.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 9-26-L7 pp.A3
. North Korea's Foreign Minister, Ri Yong Ho threatened to shoot down U.S. warplanes over their air space after President Trump said he would eradicate North Korea. The comments were made at the U.N General Assembly meetings.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-26-L7 pp. A4
. U.S. Secretary of State, Tillerson says the U.S. is talking with North Korea through open channels.
Ref:The San Diego U-T L0-L-17 pp.A4
. President Trump will travel to Asia in November to seek a "Common Front" against North Korea. He will visit S-nations: Japan, South Korea, China, Philippines, and Vietnam.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-30-17 pp. A4
. Some-half of the population of South Sudan were cut off from Red Cross aid workers because the workers were being shot, and some 6.0E6 people are at risk. Since 2013, tens of thousands have been killed and 2.0E6 are fleeing the country.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 9-L4-17 pp.A3
. Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said he signed a deal to purchase Russian surface to air missile systems. The West is trying to keep Turkey out of the Russian sphere of influence.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-13-17 pp. A3
. U.S. and Russian envoys are meeting in Finland this week, in a bid to calm diplomatic tensions at a level, of the Cold War. U.S. State Department's 3'd ranking member Thomas Shannon, will meet with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov that had several other meetings in 2007 to resolve U.S. Russian tensions. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov will meet in New York on the side lines of the U.N. General Assembly.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-10-17 pp. A6
3.0 Water lssues
3.1. Regulation
The Metropolitan Water District-MWD-of Southern California attempted to divert water toward Southern CA cities by buying up and throttling water use on thousands of acres of farmland, says a lawsuit filed last week in Riverside County Superior Court. A lawsuit says they violated a 2OO4 agreement that paid farmers not to grow crops on their land, freeing up water for coastal cities served by MWD.
Ref:The San Diego U-ï 9-27-I7 pp. 82
3.L.L Water Rights
8 The U.S. and Mexico unveiled an agreement on 9-27-L7 to preserve the overtaxed Colorado River, including spending millions on conservation and environmental projects and drawing up plans to deal with any shortages amid drought, and climate change.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-28-17 pp. All
3.2 Rivers and Lakes
The San Diego River saw a huge increase of pollution from human feces in the Winter of 201-6, says regional water quality regulators. The pollution moves down the river to Ocean Beach and Tourmaline Surfing Park in Pacific Beach at the mouth of Tourmaline creek after it rains. The SDRWQCB says human faces has more pathogens in it than from racoons, coyotes, horses, or dogs. Public opinion is that the San Diego County is not holding up it's responsibility for public health issues in San Diego.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-13-17 pp. A1 & A6
3.2.L Dams
lf inspection reports of the failure of CA's Oroville dam are needed, l-00's of U.S. dams, more than SO-years old may have to be reexamined and upgraded. The September 5,2OL7 report pinned much of the blame for the failure on the 1968 dams design and construction.
Ref: ENR, September t8,2Ot7 pp. 14
3.5 Recycled Water
3.5.2 Desalination
Article on producing water from air at a rate of 3-L-fresh water/day from 20% humid air, and L- kg of metal organic framework-MOF-using Sun light and crystals called MOF that absorb water as the air passes through them, and requires the Sun's heat to release the water.
Ref: Mechanical Engineering, September 2OI7 pp. 22-23
3.6 Municipal Water System Contamination
Todd Flood, of Ml's Attorney General's Office, will add charges of involuntary manslaughter against Ml's Chief Medical Executive-Dr. Eden Wells, over Flint's tainted water crisis and Legionnaires disease.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-10-1-7 pp. A2
4.0 Pipelines and Tunnel lssues
4.1- Pipelines
4.1-.1- Water
The MWD voted on LO-L1.-L7 to pay its share of the S16E9 project cost, to build 2-massive tunnels to pipe water from Northern California to Southern California cities. That move guarantees more than a quarter of the needed funding for the project. An agricultural group withdrew its blocking in September 20L7.
Ref:The San Diego U-T L0-L1-17 pp. A2
9 4.L.5 Oil and Gas
4.1.5.1 U.S.
A federaljudge says the Dakota Access Oil Pipeline, can continue operating while a study is completed to assess its environment impact on an American lndian tribe.
Ref:The San Diego U-T L0-12-L7 pp.4LL
4.2 Tunnels
British authorities approved a plan for a contentious and long delayed road tunnel under the site of Stonehenge, that does not impede views of the Sun, during the Winter Solstice.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-L3-L7 pp. A3
5.0 Transportat¡on Environmental lssues
6.0 Transportation Financial lssues
6.4 State, County, and City
The CO, DOT selected Kiewit Meridian Partners, to lead a P3 to design, build, and finance a reconstruction of l-70 through Denver, with the Central 70, a 5L.2E9 project-the largest ever in the state's history.
Ref: ENR, 4/L1.,2017 pp.2I
6.4.2 Gasoline Prices
The average cost of gasoline in CA went up 6Ç/gal in the last week and in San Diego it was up 5C/gal. Hurricane Harvey closed at least LO-refineries in the Gulf, resultingin20% of the U.S. refinery capacity being down. This lead to a t7C/gal increase in national gasoline prices in the last week. Price's in TX were up 21,Ç/gal, and some stations were not able to get supplies.
Ref: The San Diego U-I9-2-17 pp. C1
6.5 Rail, HSR, and Light Rail
Article on House B:ll72L and Senate Bill 5.407 to make the Short Line Rehabilitation Tax Credit (45G) permeant.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2Ot7 pp.44
¡ The September 30, 20L7 deadline for states and Amtrak to spend SL0.0E9 from the 2009's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, on passenger rail projects is close. lt's overall impact and effectiveness was minimal, says Trains.
Ref: Train's, October 2OL7 pp. 48-55 o Questions and answers on funding for railroads from Trump's campaign promises, with U.S. Senator John Thune R-South Dakota said that he expects some funding in 2018 and that the FAST ACT and STB
L0 reauthorization have been passed. He also believes Trump's Sf .Of fZ infrastructure bill with SZOO¡g ¡n government funding over L0-years will be successful with P3s.
Ref: Trains, October 2OL7 pp. L2
7.0 Airport and Global Space lssues
T.l Airports
7.L.5 Safety
Speaking at an industry conference in Washington D.C., Doug Parker, chief executive of American Airlines, said the effects of Hurricane lrma and earlier hurricanes that tore through Houston will be short-lived.
Ref: The San Diego U-ï 9-26-17 pp. C1 & C4
7.L.6 U.S.
Edgemoor lnfrastructure and Real Estate on September 6, won the contract for the single- terminal redevelopment of Kansas City lnternational Airport.
Ref: ENR, September 17 ,20L7 pp. 17 and ENR. SepI AIIL,2017 pp. t8
. The Denvercitycouncilon August L4,2OL7 approved a $f.g¡g contract, with a PPA led bySpain-based Ferrovial, to upgrade the terminal at the Denver lnternational Airport.
Ref: ENR, September4 /L1,, 2OI7 pp. 6
7.2 Global and Space
A Soyuz Space Capsule with 2-Americans aboard docked with the ISS and left from the Russian space- launch facility in Kazakhstan on Tuesday. They docked 5.5-hrs later. lt was Joe Acaba's of NASA 3'd trip, Russian Alexander Misurkin's 2nd, and the l-'t for American Mark Vande Hei. All will stay for 5.5-months and 3-others have been on the station since July 2017.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-13-L7 pp. A3
7.2.2 U.S.
Space X successfully launched a satellite into space, on a previously used rocket-for the 3'd- time. They delivered a satellite for Luxembourg-based SES Satellites. About 9-minutes later the Falcon 9 settled onto the company's barge, in the Atlantic Ocean. The rocket left from Kennedy Space Centers launch Complex 394.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 1-0-12-17 pp.410
7.2.4 Planets
7.2.4.IMars
Article on designing robots to build future living structures on Mars.
Ref: ENR, September 4/IL,2OL7 pp.26-31
LL 8.0 Border and Culture lssues
8.L Border
The San Diego County Board of Supervisors, voted to join the growing legal campaign to force the federal government to do more to stop sewage from spilling over the border from Tijuana, and fouling the South Bay beaches.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 10-11-L7 pp. 81 & 83
8.1".L lmport-Export
A delegation of business leaders and elected officials from San Diego and Baja California went to the nation's capital seeking answers on the future of NAFTA.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 9-28-17 pp. CL & C4
. Chinese SUV maker, Great Wall Motors is proposing to buy Fiat Chryslers, Jeep unit says Chairman Wei Jianjun's future goal plan. Fiat Chrysler's CEO Sergio Marchionne says the company is for sale and cannot compete globally without a partner. Great Wall Motors Ltd. headquartered in Baoding, southwest of Beijing, is growing up next to Shanghai Automotive lndustries.
Geely Holding Group moved into global sales, buying Sweden's Volvo from Ford Motor Company in 2010 forming a third brand Lynk & Co. Geely also bought up 49.9% of Malaysian, Proton, and controlling interest in British, Lotus. ln 2011 state-owned Chinese, Dongfeng Motor Group bought 1.4% of Frances PSA Peugeot Citoen, E.U.'s 2nd -largest automobile manufacturer. Great Wall sold 1.1E6 SUV's in 2016 and now meets U.S. safety standards.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 8-22-17 pp.Ca
. John Murphy, senior official with U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said they will work on solutions to NAFTA's upgrades with Mexico and Canada. The 4th round of talks will be held in Washington D.C. this week.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 1-0-8-L7 pp.A6
. Reading & Northern Railroad-R & N is participating in a major coal-move with Xcoal Energy & Resources that will be exporting 700E3-tons of coal for energy production, to Ukraine by the end of 2017. The coal will replace Russian-origin coal at thermal power plants. Half the tonnage will be anthracite coal from Reading Anthracite Coal. R & N will supply the cars in unit trains of L00-or more cars to Norfolk Southern in Reading, PA for delivery to the CNX Terminal in Baltimore.
Ref: Railway Age, August 2OL7 pp.8
8.1.2 Ports of Entry
Trump issued orders to ban most citizens from 7-countries: lran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, and North Korea to travel in the U.S. Citizens from lraq and Venezuela will also be restricted to certain activities.
Ref:The San Diego U-T9-25-17 pp. A1 & A6
t2 ¡ Gov. Brown signed Senate B¡ll 54 limiting who state and local enforcement agencies can hold, question, and transfer at the request of federal immigration authorities. lt will take effect on January 2OL7 and would target dangerous criminals.
Ref:The San Diego U-T L0-6-17 pp. A1 & A7
. Thousands of Puerto Ricans are cramming onto flights to the mainland U.S. rather than endure for months without power. FL has i".0E6 Puerto Ricans and sees some L00E3-more coming.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-6-17 pp.A2
. Update on border wall prototypes that will start soon.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 9-26-L7 pp. AL & A6
. The slow inspection process to cross the U.S.-Mexican Port of Entry-POE- with trucks carrying cargo that can take up to 6-hr, could be sped up between Tijuana and San Diego. A new program will allow qualifying shippers from maquiladora industry factories to reduce wait times at inspection stat¡ons on the border. lt's a first for the Otay Mesa POE-the 2nd busiest POE on the border.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 1-0-9-1-7 pp. AL & A8
8.2 Culture
North Korea sends 1"0's of thousands of workers overseas, that send SZOO to SSOOf6/yr to North Korea. North Korean nuclearweapons have cost more than S1.0E9.70%of the workers'pay istaken by Kim Jong-un.
Ref: The San Diego U-T 10-5-17 pp.C2 o lnterviews with workers at the factory that produces parts for the Audi SUV in Puebla state, Mexico shows they work for |Z.zS/hr tSLL0/wkl and live in government subsidized 5OO-ft2 apartments. They take home about 550/wk after deductions for mortgages and cafeteria meals.
Ref: The San Diego U-T9-26-17 pp. C2
. Gunman Stephen Paddock, shot or killed 527 and 59-people respectively, from a Los Vegas hotel at the Harvest Festival concert across the street.
Ref:The U-T San Diego 10-3-L7 pp. A1-44 & A6
. Update on immigration priorities of the Trump Administration: funding of the American-Mexican wall; crack down on the influx of Central American, under-aged minors; and curbs on federal grants to sanctuary cities, says Congress. There are 690E3-unauthorized immigrants enrolled in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.
Ref:The San Diego U-T 10-9-17 pp. A1 & A6
John G Wotzka, 720 4th Ave. San Diego, CA 92L01, Ph. 619-446-769},[email protected]
13 *ctobcr 17 r ?Qt? 1,7- l,)-1 f 1"09 : l3 iìCVi)
l{lehel1,c Poa*ela CÀF Erecutlçe Asslstant' Çlerk of th* Boe:d
Hi Håehe}le'
I plan to go befone Sil!ùÐåG ?ransportatlon Camnåttee on Oetober ?00 ?û!7o al 9a"m,¡ reqa::clinq Fry SX"*!.n aqalnst Ïtr9r GRÊS$ åqffi'LlGgÌÐËn nY raptd.l,y dacllnlng health anC ask lf there are any qr.:eçtåans or concep*s, before ?4r CA$g !f{SAßg-
ÞlSIrlI Count rlate *etober ??s 2A.l?^ åfter ¡{y CASB lfA,Lr{GgME}t? I pl*,n'to prneeed.
MT$r .,lttçrre¡, Hichae)- Ri.pley call,e¿l ¡ne leter ln the rlay *nd cffc::erl, me $10CI0"00
rtANÐ A 1rtp CAnп* Th*n a fr¡r,¡ senàences he ra]is*d lt to $ZCOO.0O + å TÀP çrtþtl
T thanked ?rLm for the åns:¡}t and lnf,orrned Ì:1lrl that ïå¡as å far c::y frorn $J0,000'*0t I saido îr-Gaod Byelt" before t,!'rç F*ard once aqaln, this Frida.Y' I look forwaþ,¿ to speaklng thank y*ra for beång there, Ì¡flchelle' Sincere I
$*ncy L" Flalntåff Fro
1[ Rår ilALts
bPÀ& tlut¡AßtA i PE}II
0RoNQU I os
0.t 00s lio¡{gRos . FUItlONÊS. 0€s sol 8 CORAZOH 8RÀ¿O ..,., ..,:, ¡lôeto MASAJFA IUç Pffç vf5 I CuLÂ
AlîoxÍ.5 1, SIEiITATE EN SI¡.¡.A DE MADER.A. 2, CARAAI. NORTE Y RTIAJATE, cot 0t 91,-TlR roYAs,PtÀsltcos, rr¿sft ?. MErArEs, TRÂN5Vt Âs0 lto 4. CRANOE PONEfi 5U ßODII¡O SOERÉ UN IAP€IE, COLON 5. RCSptf;Añ Ê¡lH r ASCEilo[ülE íaÉfq, 6, EXHAT Ê POñ tA SOCA, txlEsl t [0 T.COMENZANDO CON 0fLcA00 PI€ DERECTIO. 8, RUEDÁ Et RODIITO POR 2 MIIs,. cA0tÂA L REPnÊ coN Er Plt tzQUtERÞo. vtJr6A 10, MASSJEA AMrgs p¡¡S lr¡lSr,¡ô nsñ,tpo usANDo ñlj¡lg lAs BoLAs DE tÂDos DÈr RoDllto. _ aÞÍxo¡ce R00t lL cocc I s PilrÉ n,^u'o o, r¡lllló UTTßO Pf,OSfATA
{rtgê¡rùna\ o$llf'¿ , t*"t"to FALOP¡O
¡3 n.yfr m rsajistqi @gmp ii.co m qurRoPoDtsTAl CHtROPoot$T . ESPECIALISTA DE LOS PIES CURANDERA uñAs r¡¡reRRaol : -YoUlúBE: .be/VqUryLnS , -riasajista de 73 años.,, Qutropndim , FgZó¡ dê voz¡ 633-10-s4
4lì ç ?û*sla3. Îçr:rae* Ðeveb¡:*entp ïne* lti? + lTa:tey L, r.l*skadenn #¿l*5 P*eLC.*nt l,YIl ¡ *c¿*b*r !?, ?*ZT
ã:I ¡ Orchesåratcd F'x¡aelr i:::fas?a'ç14¡t
{Gpçàeefeaèðd ûct*ber. 17 n 2*w S:-kån ca¡n* t* $r.f hrlr4e è+ spray fcr ax Rgåeh trnfastetåen* ¡ b*v Far ,i*Ï¡ansat?r 1'fesSey ?erreee Fu3"3-elå:r¿ $up*:wiear" Ç::kin i::f,.:rned:re, çEàu:r" !:one ås nct safe f';r.vou. and Ji";'# kitt¡"åfi"
TÌ:*ref*rç' ä am :-'equestång to be *ov*C into the €r'r¡,*ty aparà:t*xå *.c:r*ss th* hållâ preferably *¡ith a ¡.¡sçrlan flo*r, I ha'¡+ cancÐTr ra.diatå=n ;:*is*nångnry åt? íl-1 ar:d get'bing ".rsrse r¡ith all t'Ì:ås $bo*lÈat $urpressl*ã' $y contracl çr¿rmisêc is€ a {så.FÐ e $.qf?æ .9 FFÄClrFiií, Tilri,lTF.s}B&}ll" Thås hs"c nnt beçn affo:.ded n¡el i:r$Sï.$gì ¡L{Ð 4:nO$tti Ii{,W Tf0}E $}"ã'ãt afta{ 3 çged. Johaneon åv: Ç¿'::"t for @IÐÐR åBffi, F+br'¡a:'y ïQt?, êfter rry l{ea:*ieig there á*r, PIffi. æ3å1,Iå3Ïtrìf. #** ffiA-ffiÆ
I cr¡ntend thåt FAR atOiIA¡¡9çt, ?fI BLrJï,*ã¡fi $Upæmü$0R¡ and" hås lffiB*}fAãf STR- FRE$,$äC$1 has cr*hçstra.tecl,e nher* the ".*hcle llth fl.oo:" ls ånfestert¡ tryirg to ¡'aF¿ç ã@ oÐF{ ån tu'nr EYffFSfIfiIE "&lL of :ny belongångs åp€ *n the patåos î{.v så+thes are the fli FEtrED {P, Þrevent inq rrre frcn eooklnE, shor'".erån9". no p*âee and UT*ASE ffiåI' fi under lE0*å,klgf SII.AFABS$ïÕÌ{" ffigf l{l1rg TIE? }f gå'l'lffll COliñTfFFI¡l¡iAäårc$ ' Thero ås sn .e¡çt:f apartnrent åc¡oss the hail"" I ar* ree¡uest1ng tç be moverl out af lrålr--- dangorous eRvlronnent ancl. v¡*v*d t* a safe åts€âo Thereforeg Ð}eaçe let 'x¡e kncrre A,3AP, :¡hen I *sn exjl*ct ar4y action *n thls v*ry serlo':s issË.er g nq y*Ð.,ÆWétf'F7v-qtgl ÞTancy ï,. :F+05 C*r:.:rà CIertlfåed lïol..åståe' cÏtrp-çpçÐrsf
ÇÇs Wesley Methodlst Chureh $an Ðåeg* $lstr'1et ,4ttorne.yu ELDPR åBGIE ïiouså*g and l,trban e{ev*lopmenÈ $an Ð1eg+ Hcuslr:g Falke*berg & S11l"1a:*o Ine" Praeå*.e::t T]**ald Tru:iç
fct Mt
Ø, þn' tutT q Cr Ai'sr Êçr þ fÌI1 wwE r Ç ¿ ( nÌrw / c4ß rNW W Þ, ì /Yt*tctl l/ utt
t (2 ( e \
d"-/ft-a"u ì
\
( C ¡o -lâ://
atxr c ( ,( It/cn (^ (j-
Taylor 5. rÊBar:maffrt{, aal ?6.?6 Haøa C tenter Ðri"ve #grs ,t t' $ar: Såago, Califo:'xia 9?:"C8 I. !i v FRa llancy å" 0uskaden' L*--F*re9*L+*flgÆæg Iloiis tic ChÍropodisy/eourt Ce:"tåfie¿i. t( jlli.J l{onr*e .årrenuo #4*5 #{ ,q6 l2 San Þiego, Calåfornåa 9213-5 i#* îìrF " &.prå). 4, ?Al7 q Èl;'c ¿gt çIJSKåÐE!$ vs JOn&gSçN f,{{ '+ EiÐgÊ ÅBtlsE Case $ 3? *zAL? -tCI00?1ûB*su*ffi-eîL ngSfRliIt'¡I$G Ç]nÐEE
#1 'rBaunennr, I åM $gf À tt¡æ'3Å lou may eecalln on þ¿rch ?2' ?.*L7, ån ihe $an Ðlago Sup*råor Caurt'n during rly {Restraåning trder Hearingdo ag*ånst FSR .IOHA3'ï$OIü¡ Super'åntendent of IIESIõT TERF,ÂC$ fdiì{¡*CtËT ¡i$U$ïI\fG($UÐ) on þjonroe ¡lçenus, $an Ð1ego, $a*, when ihe Han J.adge Tamål¿ Ipere instructed yoa; ilput a eârÞr& ai her dsor se she ean see wh* is ållega}þ going in and ou¿ af herh<¡næ.""d And, so I ean s€e ìr-l¡û is ¡:utting *trashû at lry dson !å 'I{ES[6Y TgFfiÀCE refuses to i,æYestigata" because¡
ú$EX PEfrgFRT À tSPEttT' COIüÐ0I{ å? Mr ÐOGR* 3*14*i? "T0ïiå?ISON$FUT 3*Z?*t? *$gl FEåVERf JOIIAI$$OÌFI S?00D å CTJCUI'{BE'q. Åf ¡tr Ð0çP! gû1 3-?g*t? 'rsEl[ PgRtæRt ioilÀhE0hrü $TûtÊ ¡t mÊ A? ÞÏr P0tR' *M:rsd Ås ¡rs¿ at:€ a¡rår€, just before Ch¡lstmas 2t16 Ðiane Joh¿nson uas får"ed frcrn idggirEY fERRÀCü, as-the Êesådent lfanager, *Fsr saving rÕoms for friends'.'t l¿st ¡qeek a $an Ðåeg* Coun?,y $ociel Worker ånfo,rmed rnen ?lF"åLligNBErc has indiçidr¡aL taaeras ín 10 ef their otirer ÏíiIÐ buåldingsljlr thåt *¡isr Gillian.*lrìÌ$o
So¡ here l"t 1s e i,¡¡EEKS ÀFTER &ff f Çourt Hoaringt and f am stll-l r+aitång fer I,íÐSIEÏIS fSECURtff & F,EåCtjf . fn the meantime, please email ma(nanc¡.]¿nasajistqå@gnraàI.ecra) the ¡e*ras of all erployees at Hesley ?erraee and the naæìÊs of èhoee llho i¡ave !{ÅS1ER " -'- llET$. Tks"
$eø ¡ra at Trial5 June lju 201? tXrûOP$ i"n Ðept/Sî'fi Ç-2.21CÀSE# 3?^21fi-Q03¿l?-6¿*¿|
Çc¡ PffiSIÐEHT Ð0$ÀI..B TRITMP åÍrn Ben tarsçn, Secretary of IÍOIJSI$G åNÐ üfrtså!;l OEitEiûFÞ@lüT(mm) Ffr. Ðavid Moritoya, Ins¡roetor General - I{lÐ Hr" Ray Bre,wer/Hreo Harråsr L"&. Ëistråct Field $ffi"cers * i{UD pænnie no¡"riå'*-niu{"*.*t, tl - san Biego C*unty *croeld su¡:ervås*r/sn*a*e Chaårpersan Rrgette Gopez - Ðistrict I : se'n Ðiele tity Çounellpereon (201é) ¡lMs¿ Gill-iarn, Onner of HtjÐ li6$LE'y IËRP,åCE, San Ëråegco Cailfornie tgcogletr i$ancy L, tuskaden for Ça1ifo¡nia Conuaission on Judiclal Fe:'for¡llalice Report Ðneloç¡:re
df Ê3i .{1, *- T a:n e ?6 y-cars iÞi'::aì Êcr.n TJ" S" Cç;,,'IGIR¡,, trrlrn i:'. t'he rcåddl-e cf e eov::fisl,l
tB lå?fûCSÐ Ì¿ tha gîeåi state of l¡¡ici:Lg+a" ?cday I eË bei:?g "TSl'';Eii-SCfgl'¡liÐ-US3ll Þ,:,'iafûP#cRå?E ¿"ÞS:RïCå,|.. I just ¡aesised a s*-at!:i*g Letter fron 1fC*EPû&!T,E å.¡gF,iCÅi'i" th=eaieniag ta raåse x'g EîIÐ - SIICTICI{*$ - å¡*r:+ CüST FFL'STÀ* ÊS}ry F.B3iq $=3+,** Ti}
:;l 1 i 15 "':.3ji':$¡.8'9, sçi!"ûü ï1{tffiå'18"
¡íûT.1Ë ï$ ?Êg :,1511$.i { T:: 6 r:snihs tin+ i*¡r SÛPS.F.L elftge*l8$} shot up -uo 1#å/91 J*st iÉ. *Èlicrsg * ,'._ lþ Cor'rpiaå*t :."a s.y'ås 3 Is ts*ïg I.g ¡IEåIgE T.S
Ì.îr få *ûÞice¡Täd Ë This ,sEjli FriF.lRitr/Ti[EF ]fE:,r,il.Ð .åi Furr ",Êc9". " e$J;ã!-ÐËwi¿-* ï c¿nteeieê. ths ,¡CtilFûR*"TE tF,.T:CE'i e¡-,â infcÏir:scì. the:l cT; xt ISfrF ElrliEF,So 3, i{'-{ÊÐ;
ÊdrEB .gi'Ð L Iår¡J"?.$.,*tB3 {lt* ¡,n¡r;rggnç}o gr¿ gcirsE}E ÅT TI& så}€¡ 1:}5 ÐiqÐ89, þg ¡it}:
.FISCR'¡illi{RGìr¡'1 F3f.}Í 8:i"}.io g+ 1å Ä""U" E1.83ï Tg{IÈ-q}ê-T }flR!r.rll.T}"""ot-1 ä'.'u s ånfcrn*Ct
,tç_¿ig¡g gcgj;,3 ?E¡rrî¡.Ë?: : y : $ r¡€
:it r,'g âesi::aåning û=d.e-* I{ae.rìngi¡ ¿r:: iierch î2, ?Ci?, the F-cn. iûCge ia¡lÍia- E* îpa:ra - t¡ii ¡ne, *ã s'.rggest.¡r':u'gei e 6*od aÈtor:i*¡i ancl sue the of Èþe b'¿üdår:gå4 ",t:ï¡e" Eesea:reh i¡i.icatcs thgt f,is" FrisselL¿ Gå11-å*.r{ c¡:nË:i3 ijt!} bu3}-d5.*gsi:r and ¿r*unC
$a.n Ðåeg':, årir-;?n:" eioål. !1 .*C*R3ûF,¡JIIÌ?, f i¡l-d :¡'¡lTij i i å- { I *+- gc sì':cppi::gu after I tai:¿ ?ER J*IT¡.}:S*}ï" F:rii-di.g i{ai nåerraa:* }-a:* ge*, t* î{."ri=Ìl "i.:¡ iülf$ at ip"m" ! ffiÊ S:i1I DããiG P,åiL üF JTiS?IC$, SåFI IrTæ*r CÂ1.ij.r*iì3i3Ê-; tç
ÛSSK*.ÐE:{ .i's JçEåilSOÌf i ? *2 Û3' ?* t *3¿r? 6l,'!:"* st *-cg-e? L
i Þr1
t-''^ ¿ '^i a'J It ncg L" *'¿skad*n ._/ I w 5-a{t3 i"îonru= 4.v=- #.t+û5 S+n }åeg*, **ì-if*rnåa Ê2åi5 . li¿.'r t0o ?ili?