Exiled Reason Affluent Than My Parents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exiled Reason Affluent Than My Parents They were generally those more "with it," more industrious, and above all more Exiled Reason affluent than my parents. Healthy anti- Semites limited themselves to being only as anti-Semitic as was absolutely neces- sary—necessary, that is, if Jews were to Kurt Baier be excluded from certain sectors of public life and the social and business worlds. was raised in Austria in a petit-bour- Healthy anti-Semitism was contrasted to Igeois, conservative, and strict Catholic the "excessive" variety, which carried family. Our small house was furnished opposition to Jews beyond this plainly with inherited Biedermeier furniture, necessary minimum. We were all familiar already grown a bit shabby. The walls with indisputable examples of it. There were hung with a few portraits of ladies was, for instance, the numerus clausus and gentlemen—said to be ancestors—in (quota system), which kept Jews out of Biedermeier clothing, copies of Dutch medicine and law: one would not, after masters, and several framed postcards all, want to have one's wife examined by from Johannes Brahms, in which he a Jew. There were also clear examples of promises to come over to play chamber excessive anti-Semitism, for instance, that music. My stepfather—my real father espoused by Schönerer. And there were died when I was quite young—was very borderline cases, such as Lueger, who musical and was particularly proud of might be classified in either way. I knew these postcards, which had been sent to a how to rate these gentlemen before I knew distant relative. He played the cello and what measures they actually proposed. the flute and sang in a Catholic men's Politically naïve as I was, this healthy choir. Although he was not fond of anti-Semitism appeared to me to be self- evening parties, there was usually cham- evidently sound. Of course, we had ber music on Thursday evenings. Jewish friends, but they were obviously Although less musical, my mother played "lt seems right, then, to consider quite different from the typical Jews about the piano on these occasions, having been those Austrians who fled less whom we read so much in the papers. taught by an aunt who was supposedly the admirable than those who stayed You can, then, picture my emotions last pupil of Liszt. But my mother's great to take part in active resistance. upon discovering, when examining the rel- passion was literature. Her favorite author ... We must take into account that evant documents just before the Anschluss, was Thomas Mann, whose voice often most left involuntarily and under that my real father was, by Nazi definitions, came through clearly in her letters. most inauspicious conditions, that most likely a "full" Jew or, at the very least, I mention all this to give you a picture many later joined in the struggle a "half' Jew. Almost nothing, I believe, can of the cultural interests and general out- against Hitler from abroad, and make the concept of injustice clearer to a look of my family. We were apolitical in that many found, in emigrating, person than involuntary membership in a the sense that we knew little about politics not the new life they dreamed group against which the law and public and wanted to know nothing more. Like about, but ruin." opinion practice strict discrimination. It many people of this kind, we were con- then became clear to me in a flash—as was vinced that our outlook and our political as I had a spiritual home, it was the eigh- not clear to many so-called Aryans at that opinions sprang directly from our good teenth-century Enlightenment, while they time and perhaps remains unclear to them sense, which we regarded as nonpartisan probably would have felt most content in even today—that racial laws such as the and morally superior. As I view it now, my the Biedermeier period. And of course I Nuremberg decrees, and also attitudes such own point of view was largely a reaction had a certain affinity for liberalism—in as healthy anti-Semitism, are unjust. This against that of my parents. I was vaguely any case, for that liberalism that wags insight is particularly hard to convey to oth- liberal, because they were conservative; define as the inability to stand up for one's ers when they hold high hopes of personal cosmopolitan, because they were patriotic own cause in a dispute. gain from the so-called Aryanization of and nationalistic; freethinking, because But something characteristically Aus- Jewish businesses. they were religious; and so forth. Insofar trian was added to this pallid form of In March 1938, in this utterly unsettled Enlightenment liberalism. Certain of my and disturbed state of mind, I awaited the Kurt Baier is Professor of Philosophy at many relatives—regular Sunday visitors inevitable. We all heard on the radio the the University of Pittsburgh and a member who occasionally discussed, besides the farewell address of our unbeloved chan- of the Academy of Humanism. He is former usual family gossip, more important mat- cellor, Dr. Schuschnigg, and listened in president of the American Philosophical ters of some general interest—leaned shock as the Austrian national anthem was Association, Eastern Division. toward so-called healthy anti-Semitism. played for the last time. Soon afterward Summer 1995 27 we saw and heard the thunderous jubila- peddle my hopeless wares. But in June tion with which vast numbers of Austrians 1940, just as this new existence had greeted the arrival of the German troops opened up, I was interned, along with all and the "liberation" of Austria. Anyone other German and Austrian citizens. All who lived through this and witnessed the refugees were included, among them ruthless brutality and unbridled cruelty many who held important positions in the with which the elimination of all political British government, such as the well- opponents and the persecution, abuse, and known author Franz von Borkenau, to humiliation of Jews was carried out, at the mention only one. We were given a choice time of the Anschluss or soon thereafter, between waiting out the war in a concen- must forever harbor doubts about the tration camp on the English Isle of Man or much-sung golden hearts of the Viennese. of emigrating to Canada, where, we And anyone who observed the great and expected, we would find freedom. I, of certainly justified fear felt by many who course, chose Canada. Presumably be- had not been or who, like many of our cause of the chaos resulting from the acquaintances, could not make a cred- evacuation of the British troops after their itable pretense of having been, illegal Adolf Hitler disastrous defeat at Dunkirk, we ended up Nazis, was soon forced to recognize that to report, for fate took me quite unexpect- on a terrible ship for prisoners of war and this understandable fear would move edly to far-flung lands. But I must be brief, refugees, concerning which damning many Austrians to deny their politically for I still owe you an explanation of how I books and television films are still appear- compromised or Jewish friends, who thus arrived at philosophy and how my philo- ing, even after all these years. We soon had little hope of help from the so-called sophical career abroad is connected with learned that this ship, the Dunera, was to other Austria. It thus seemed advisable for the exile of the intelligentsia from Austria. go to Australia, not Canada. But here anyone not prepared to sacrifice his life To avoid misleading you about the life again we had great luck. The Dunera was out of political conviction in a battle of an emigrant, I must emphasize that I pursued by a German submarine and was against this unstoppable avalanche to van- was unusually lucky at critical turning hit by a torpedo which, however, failed to ish as quickly as possible. points. Each new blow that struck me explode. We experienced only a terrifying My worldly wise and affluent uncles and soon proved to be a blessing in disguise. noise, the powerful shock of the impact, aunts did in fact advise me to emigrate In August 1938, after overcoming many and hundreds of shattered plates, which while it was still possible, warning me that difficulties in Vienna, I received permis- were flung off their shelves. the position of Jews and those of mixed race sion to travel to England, where I planned After eight ghastly weeks we finally would probably become worse. They antic- to remain only briefly while awaiting a arrived in Sydney, wretched and starving. ipated the introduction of measures against visa for Brazil, which was, however, Everything we still owned when we "inferior" races, such as those against denied after a few months while I was still embarked had been stolen by the guards. I blacks in South Africa and the United in England. The blow hit me hard, as I had was barefoot, wearing a pair of green States. But the "final solution" was not sus- been quite confident I would eventually pajamas over the only underpants I still pected even by these shrewd realists, go to Brazil, where acquaintances pre- possessed. I owned nothing else. In worldly wise and free of illusion as they pared to help me. In England I could see Sydney we were immediately loaded onto were. In my fear and my revulsion at this no way to make a living. But just a few a long train that took us on an endless brutal regime, I had to concede that they days later I quite unexpectedly received journey through the backwoods of were right.
Recommended publications
  • The Oberlin Colloquium in Philosophy: Program History
    The Oberlin Colloquium in Philosophy: Program History 1960 FIRST COLLOQUIUM Wilfrid Sellars, "On Looking at Something and Seeing it" Ronald Hepburn, "God and Ambiguity" Comments: Dennis O'Brien Kurt Baier, "Itching and Scratching" Comments: David Falk/Bruce Aune Annette Baier, "Motives" Comments: Jerome Schneewind 1961 SECOND COLLOQUIUM W.D. Falk, "Hegel, Hare and the Existential Malady" Richard Cartwright, "Propositions" Comments: Ruth Barcan Marcus D.A.T. Casking, "Avowals" Comments: Martin Lean Zeno Vendler, "Consequences, Effects and Results" Comments: William Dray/Sylvan Bromberger PUBLISHED: Analytical Philosophy, First Series, R.J. Butler (ed.), Oxford, Blackwell's, 1962. 1962 THIRD COLLOQUIUM C.J. Warnock, "Truth" Arthur Prior, "Some Exercises in Epistemic Logic" Newton Garver, "Criteria" Comments: Carl Ginet/Paul Ziff Hector-Neri Castenada, "The Private Language Argument" Comments: Vere Chappell/James Thomson John Searle, "Meaning and Speech Acts" Comments: Paul Benacerraf/Zeno Vendler PUBLISHED: Knowledge and Experience, C.D. Rollins (ed.), University of Pittsburgh Press, 1964. 1963 FOURTH COLLOQUIUM Michael Scriven, "Insanity" Frederick Will, "The Preferability of Probable Beliefs" Norman Malcolm, "Criteria" Comments: Peter Geach/George Pitcher Terrence Penelhum, "Pleasure and Falsity" Comments: William Kennick/Arnold Isenberg 1964 FIFTH COLLOQUIUM Stephen Korner, "Some Remarks on Deductivism" J.J.C. Smart, "Nonsense" Joel Feinberg, "Causing Voluntary Actions" Comments: Keith Donnellan/Keith Lehrer Nicholas Rescher, "Evaluative Metaphysics" Comments: Lewis W. Beck/Thomas E. Patton Herbert Hochberg, "Qualities" Comments: Richard Severens/J.M. Shorter PUBLISHED: Metaphysics and Explanation, W.H. Capitan and D.D. Merrill (eds.), University of Pittsburgh Press, 1966. 1965 SIXTH COLLOQUIUM Patrick Nowell-Smith, "Acts and Locutions" George Nakhnikian, "St. Anselm's Four Ontological Arguments" Hilary Putnam, "Psychological Predicates" Comments: Bruce Aune/U.T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Melbourne Spectrum
    Chapter 7 The Melbourne Spectrum T IS an old saying that philosophy begins with a sense of wonder. That is a source of philosophy, but there is another one, the sense Ithat ‘that’s all bullshit (and I can explain why)’. Different philoso- phers draw on these sources in differing proportions. An uncritical sense of wonder leads one out of philosophy altogether, into the land of the fairies, to start angels from under stones, find morals at every turn and hug the rainforest. A philosopher near the other extreme — or one, like David Stove, actually occupying the extreme — will at least still be doing philosophy, but it will consist entirely of criticism of others. In the Australian intellectual tradition, the wonder/criticism mix varies not only according to individuals but according to cities. At least, it has since 1927, when John Anderson arrived in Australia and Sydney and Melbourne set off on different paths. Various writers, mainly from Melbourne, have discoursed at some length on the con- trasts between the two cities in their styles of thought, and with all due allowance made for the hot air factor, there is undoubtedly some distinct difference to be identified. Where Sydney intellectuals, fol- lowing Anderson, tend to be critical, pessimistic, classical and opposed to ‘meliorist’ schemes to improve society, Melbourne’s unctuous bien pensants are eager to ‘serve society’, meaning, to instruct the great and powerful how they ought to go about achieving Progress and the perfection of mankind.1 Manning Clark — and it is characteristic of 1 J. Docker, Australian Cultural Elites: Intellectual Traditions in Sydney and Melbourne (Sydney, 1974); V.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exclusive Interview with Sir Peter Ustinov
    Is There a Need for An Exclusive FM'M? Interview with Sir Peter Ustinov Are daydreams, by Warren Allen Smith illusions, and religious beliefs an escape from Remembering reality, or bene- ficial tools for World War II dealing with life? Racial Superiority and `Ethnic Cleansing' The Wandering Jew by Martin Gardner Editor: Paul Kurtz SUMMER 1995, VOL. 15, NO. 3 ISSN 0272-0701 r- PreS1.re I Contents C Senior Editors: Vern Bullough, Thomas W. Flynn, Gerald Larue, Gordon Stein 3 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Executive Editor: Timothy J. Madigan Managing Editor: Andrea Szalanski 5 An Exclusive Interview with Contributing Editors: Robert S. Alley, Joe E. Barnhart, David Berman, Peter Ustinov Warren Allen Smith H. James Birx, Jo Ann Boydston, Bonnie Bullough, Paul Edwards, Albert Ellis, Roy P. Fairfield, Charles 8 EDITORIALS W. Faulkner, Antony Flew, Levi Fragell, Adolf Grünbaum, Marvin Kohl, Jean Kotkin, Thelma Agenda for the Humanist Movement in the Twenty-First Century, Paul Lavine, Tibor Machan, Ronald A. Lindsay, Michael Martin, Delos B. McKown, Lee Nisbet, John Novak, Kurtz / True Believers and Utter Madness, James A. Naught I Right to Skipp Porteous, Howard Radest, Robert Rimmer, Die: The Battle Is Joined, Ronald A. Lindsay Michael Rockier, Svetozar Stojanovic, Thomas Szasz, V. M. Tarkunde, Richard Taylor, Rob Tielman 15 Humanist Potpourri Warren Allen Smith Associate Editors: Molleen Matsumura, Lois Porter 19 Editorial Associates: REMEMBERING WORLD WAR II Doris Doyle, Thomas Franczyk, Roger Greeley, 19 Racial Superiority and `Ethnic Cleansing' Revisited Paul Kurtz James Martin-Diaz, Steven L. Mitchell, Warren Allen Smith 20 Why I Am Immune to Mysticism Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Peter Railton Current Title and Office Address
    Curriculum Vitae Peter Railton Current title and office address: Home address: Gregory S. Kavka Distinguished University Professor John Stephenson Perrin Professor Arthur F. Thurnau Professor 1106 Lincoln Avenue Department of Philosophy Ann Arbor, MI 48104 The University of Michigan USA Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1003 +1 734 995 0990 USA +1 734 395 1350 (cell) Tel. +1 734 764 6285 +1 734 763 2122 Fax +1 734 763 8071 [email protected] Education Harvard University, 1968-1971, A.B. in Philosophy (1971) Princeton University, 1974-l978, Ph.D. in Philosophy (1980) Thesis: Explaining Explanation: A Realist Account of Scientific Explanation and Understanding, David Lewis, advisor Academic employment Permanent: The University of Michigan, Assistant Professor (1979-83); Associate Professor (1983-90); Professor (1990- ) Visiting: Princeton University, 1990 The University of California, Berkeley, l984-85 Honors, awards, and special fellowships External Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Member, Elected 2016 Institute of Philosophy Biennial Lectures, NYU, 2016 Center for the Study of Mind in Nature Lecture, University of Oslo, 2015 Dewey Lecture, American Philosophical Association, Central Division, 2015 President, American Philosophical Association, Central Division, 2011-2012 Invited Fellow, National Humanities Center, 2010-2011 American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Member, Elected 2004 Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship, 2001-02 American Council of Learned Societies Fellowship, 2000-01 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship, 1999-2000
    [Show full text]
  • The Order of Public Reason a Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World
    The Order of Public Reason A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World In this innovative and wide-ranging work, Gerald Gaus advances a revised, and more realistic, account of public reason liberalism, showing how, in the midst of fundamental disagreement about val- ues and beliefs, we can achieve a moral and political order that treats all as free and equal moral persons. The first part of the book analyzes social morality as a system of authoritative moral rules. Drawing on an earlier generation of moral philosophers such as Kurt Baier and Peter Strawson as well as current work in the social sciences, Gaus argues that our social morality is an evolved social fact, which is the necessary foundation of a mutually beneficial so- cial order. The second part considers how this system of social moral authority can be justified to all moral persons. Drawing on the tools of game theory, social choice theory, experimental psy- chology, and evolutionary theory, Gaus shows how a free society can secure a moral equilibrium that is endorsed by all, and how a just state respects, and develops, such an equilibrium. Gerald Gaus is the James E. Rogers Professor of Philosophy at the University of Arizona. He was previously professor of philosophy and political economy at Tulane University. He is the author of a number of books, including On Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (2008); Contemporary Theories of Liberalism (2003); and Justificatory Liberalism (1996). His essay “On Justifying the Moral Rights of the Moderns” won the 2009 American Philosophical Association’s Kavka Award.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Ethics
    Chapter 16 Last Rights: Applied Ethics BELIEVE that it is now pretty generally accepted by profes- sional philosophers that ultimate ethical principles must be ‘Iarbitrary’,1 wrote Brian Medlin in 1957. That may have been a slight exaggeration, but the tendency of philosophy in the mid-cen- tury was certainly towards an extreme minimalism in ethics. Mackie, as we saw, agreed with Medlin and denied that there was any such thing as ethics. He argued that moral properties would be ‘queer’ ones, from a scientific point of view. Where is the cruelty of an act, he asks, over and above the pain it causes and the subjective responses in the observers?2 David Armstrong spoke for many philosophers who were not primarily interested in ethics when he claimed that objec- tive value is not the kind of thing that can be causally efficacious — it would be a kind of metaphysical superfluity to the world revealed by science.3 In Melbourne, they did not go quite as far as that. Philosophers there agreed in part, but believed there were ways of refuting selfish- ness without the need to suppose there were any really moral values. There was, they thought, plenty of scope for reason in ethics, and its 1 B. Medlin, ‘Ultimate principles and ethical egoism’, AJP 35 (1957): pp. 111–8, repr. in W.P. Alston & R.B. Brandt, eds, The Problems of Philosophy: Introductory Readings (Boston, 1967), pp. 229–35. 2 J. Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, pp. 38–41; similar in P. Godfrey-Smith, ‘No, Virginia, there is no right or wrong’, Proceedings of the Russellian Society 10 (1985): pp.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016–2018 Institut Wiener Kreis Institute Vienna Circle
    FAKULTÄT FÜR PHILOSOPHIE UND 2016–2018 BILDUNGSWISSENSCHAFT INSTITUT WIENER KREISFakultät für Philosophie und Bildungswissenschaft der Universität Wien INSTITUTE VIENNA CIRCLEFaculty of Philosophy and Education University of Vienna WIENER KREIS GESELLSCHAFT Gegründet als „Institut Wiener Kreis“ Verein zur Förderung wissenschaftlicher Weltauffassung VIENNA CIRCLE SOCIETY Established as “Institute Vienna Circle” Society for the Advancement of the Scientific World Conception 2016–2018 INSTITUT WIENER KREISFakultät für Philosophie und Bildungswissenschaft der Universität Wien INSTITUTE VIENNA CIRCLEFaculty of Philosophy and Education University of Vienna WIENER KREIS GESELLSCHAFT Gegründet als „Institut Wiener Kreis“ Verein zur Förderung wissenschaftlicher Weltauffassung VIENNA CIRCLE SOCIETY Established as “Institute Vienna Circle” Society for the Advancement of the Scientific World Conception GELEITWORT DES DEKANS Das Institut Wiener Kreis ist seit 2011 eine der Gesellschaft Wiener Kreis aktiv sein. Die Subeinheit der Fakultät für Philosophie und Leitung des Instituts wird aber seine bisherige Bildungswissenschaft. Neben den Instituten für Stellvertreterin, Frau Assoz. Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Philosophie und Bildungswissenschaft hat es Dr. Esther Ramharter übernehmen, als stellver- als Subeinheit ein markantes Profil entwickelt: tretender Institutsleiter wird Herr Univ.-Prof. Dr. Die Befassung mit der Philosophie des Wiener Martin Kusch fungieren. Damit eng verbunden ist Kreises und seinen Folgen erfolgt ebenso eine Neupositionierung des Instituts
    [Show full text]
  • Dismissive Replies to “Why Should I Be Moral?” JOHN J
    p. 1 Dismissive Replies to “Why Should I Be Moral?” JOHN J. TILLEY INDIANA UNIVERSITY–PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS (IUPUI) [email protected] Social Theory and Practice 35(3) (2009): 341–368. Please cite the published version. 1. Replies to “Why should I be moral?” are generally of two kinds: those that purport to answer the question and those that dismiss it as spurious. Those of the first kind aim not to discredit the question but to show that everyone, including the why-be-moral skeptic, is required by reason to be moral. Either that or they aim, more modestly, at showing that most people, though perhaps not the skeptic, have good or decisive reasons to live morally. I find these replies unsatisfying when they are modest and unconvincing when they are not;1 so it is with interest that I examine the second, dismissive, kind of reply.2 I start with a dismissive reply, hereafter called DR, that has several adher- ents and often turns up in ethics texts. Roughly, DR asserts that “Why should I be moral?” is ill-conceived—ill-conceived if it solicits moral reasons to be moral, because such reasons are plain to see; ill-conceived if it solicits non- moral reasons to be moral, because no one can reasonably request such reasons. This reply is unsatisfactory; it commits a serious error. The error is worth exposing, for it infects not only DR but much of the literature on the justifica- tion of morals. Also, the steps taken to expose it undermine three other attempts to dismiss “Why should I be moral?” as spurious.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association
    September 2011 Volume 85, Issue 1 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association apa THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION Eastern Division Program University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 www.apaonline.org The American Philosophical Association Eastern Division One Hundred Eighth Annual Meeting Marriott Wardman Park Washington, DC December 27 - 30, 2011 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association (ISSN 0065-972X) is published five times each year and is distributed to members of the APA as a benefit of membership and to libraries, departments, and institutions for $75 per year. It is published by The American Philosophical Association, 31 Amstel Ave., University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Periodicals Postage Paid at Newark, DE and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Proceedings and Addresses, The American Philosophical Association, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Editor: David E. Schrader Phone: (302) 831-1112 Publications Coordinator: Erin Shepherd Fax: (302) 831-8690 Associate Editor: Richard Bett Web: www.apaonline.org Meeting Coordinator: Linda Smallbrook Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, the major publication of The American Philosophical Association, is published five times each academic year in the months of September, November, January, February, and May. Each annual volume contains the programs for the meetings of the three Divisions; the membership list; Presidential Addresses; news of the Association, its Divisions and Committees, and announcements of interest to philosophers. Other items of interest to the community of philosophers may be included by decision of the Editor or the APA Board of Officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    PAUL E. HURLEY PROFESSOR 4/4/20 Sexton Professor of Philosophy 1690 N. Mountain Ave Claremont McKenna College Claremont, CA 91711 850 Columbia Avenue [email protected] Claremont, CA 91711 (909) 607-7140 EDUCATION Ph.D. in Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh 1988 Dissertation: “The Practical Given” (advisor, Kurt Baier; 2nd reader, David Gauthier) M.A. in Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh 1986 B.A. in Philosophy with honors, University of Notre Dame 1982 EMPLOYMENT Sexton Professor of Philosophy, Claremont McKenna College 2007-present Director, CMC Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Program, 2018-present Visiting Research Fellow, Murphy Institute Center for Ethics, Tulane University, 2016-2017 Co-coordinator, CMC Program in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics 2006-16 Fagothey Distinguished Visitor, Santa Clara University Spring 2007 Professor, Pomona College 2002-2006 Associate Professor, Pomona College 1994-2002 Invited Visitor, University of Pittsburgh 1998 Visiting Associate Professor, University of Arizona 1994 Co-director, Pomona College PPE Program 1988-2006 Assistant Professor, Pomona College 1988-1994 AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION AND CONCENTRATION Specialization: Ethics, Metaethics Concentration: Political Philosophy, Business Ethics, Philosophy of Law FELLOWSHIPS AND GRANTS Murphy Institute Visiting Research Fellowship, Tulane University 2016-2017 KLI Course Development Grant 2013 Freshman Humanities Seminar Course Development Grant 2009 Fagothey Distinguished Visitor, Santa Clara University 2007 Summer Research Grants, Claremont McKenna College 2006-08 Wig Course Preparation Grant (with Eleanor Brown) 2000 Templeton Foundation Grant (with Eleanor Brown) 1999-2000 Summer Research Grant, Irvine Foundation 1996 Steele Foundation Sabbatical Subvention Grant 1993 Teaching Fellowship, University of Pittsburgh 1983-87 Mellon Fellowship, Mellon Foundation 1982-83 HONORS AND AWARDS Glenn R.
    [Show full text]