Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga Na Matunda | Quarterly Report #7

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga Na Matunda | Quarterly Report #7 FEED THE FUTURE TANZANIA MBOGA NA MATUNDA Quarterly Report # 7 October 1 - December 31, 2018 Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #7 Fintrac Inc. www.fintrac.com [email protected] US Virgin Islands 3077 Kronprindsens Gade 72 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Tel: (340) 776-7600 Fax: (340) 776-7601 Washington, DC 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel: (202) 462-8475 Fax: (202) 462-8478 Feed the Future Mboga na Matunda (FTFT-MnM) P.O Box 13121, Plot No. 37 Mlandege Street | Mikocheni B Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Cover photo: FTFT-MnM agronomist training farmers and extension agents on maintenance of filters for drip irrigation systems at a farmers field day in Morogoro. All photos by Fintrac Inc. Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Feed the Future Tanzania Horticulture Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #7 CONTENTS ACRONYMS........................................................................................................................ i 1. ACTIVITY OVERVIEW/SUMMARY ........................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Summary of Results for this Quarter ........................................................................... 2 Table 1: Results to Date by Indicator*................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Evaluation/Assessment Status and/or Plans .............................................................. 10 2. ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS ....................................................... 10 2.1 Progress Narrative ....................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Implementation Status and Planned Activities ......................................................... 12 2.2.1 Sub-Purpose 1: Scaling nutrition-sensitive improvements in smallholder productivity ............................ 13 2.2.2 Sub-Purpose 2: Increasing the profitability of horticulture market systems and trade .......................... 19 2.2.3 Sub-Purpose 3: Strengthening the capacity of local systems linked to horticulture ................................ 24 3. INTEGRATION OF CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES .................................................... 32 3.1 Gender & Youth Integration ....................................................................................... 32 3.2 Integration & Collaboration ........................................................................................ 32 3.3 Policy & Industry Analysis ............................................................................................ 33 3.4 Sustainability ................................................................................................................. 35 3.5 Environmental Compliance ......................................................................................... 37 4. MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES ..................................................... 37 5. MONITORING, EVALUATION, & LEARNING ...................................................... 38 6. COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................. 39 7. SPECIAL EVENTS FOR NEXT QUARTER ............................................................. 40 8. ADDRESSING A/COR COMMENTS FROM LAST QUARTERLY REPORT ....... 41 ANNEX I: SMALLHOLDER FARMER RESULTS AT DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGY LEVELS ............................................................................................................................. 42 ANNEX II: MONTHLY UPDATES ............................................................................... 45 ANNEX III: SUCCESS STORIES ................................................................................... 51 ANNEX IV: PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SUMMARY TABLE .............................. 55 Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #7 ACRONYMS ASF Agrónomos Sin Fronteras ATCL Air Tanzania Company Limited CBO Community Based Organization CHV Community Health Volunteers CIRIS Client Impact & Results Information System CoE Center of Excellence COR Contracting Officer’s Representative C&F Credit and Finance DO Development Objective DQA Data Quality Assessment EAS East Africa Seeds ECLOF Ecumenical Church Loan Fund Ltd EMMP Environmental Mitigation & Monitoring Plan ENGINE Enabling Growth through Investment and Enterprise EOI Expression of Interest FI Financial institution FTF Feed the Future FTFT Feed the Future Tanzania FTFT-MnM Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda FY Fiscal Year GAP Good Agricultural Practice GoT Government of Tanzania GMP Good Manufacturing Practices GUC Grants Under Contract ICL Israel Chemicals Limited IP Implementing Partner IR Intermediate Result IRDO Integrated Rural Development Organization JUWASOMWA Jumuiya Ya Wafanyabiashara Soko la Mwanakwerekwe JUWA Jumuiya Ya Wokozi Wa Wakulima LGA Local Government Authority LK Lima Kwanza LOP Life of Project MANRLF Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources, Livestock and Fisheries MDD Minimum Diet Diversity M&E Monitoring & Evaluation MEL Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning MFI Microfinance Institution MSME Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises NEI Natural Extracts Industry Prepared by Fintrac Inc. i Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #7 NGO Nongovernmental organization PERSUAP Pesticide Evaluation Report-Safe Use Action Plan RSTGA Rungwe Small Holder Tea Grower Association SACCOS RZ Rijk Zwaan SACCO Savings and Credit Cooperative SAGCOT Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania SAIEL Sai Energy Limited SATEC Suba Agro Trading and Engineering Company SHF Smallholder Farmers SIDO Small Industry Development Organization SUGECO Sokoine University Graduate Entrepreneurship Cooperative TA Technical Assistance TAHA Tanzania Horticulture Association TAHEA Tanzania Home Economics Association TGT Tanzania Growth Trust TIS TAHA Information System TOSCI Tanzania Official Seed Certification Institute ToT Training of Trainers TPRI Tropical Pesticides Research Institute TRA Tanzania Revenue Authority USAID United States Agency for International Development USG United States Government UWAMWIMA Umoja Wa Wakulima Matunda na Mbogamboga Wilaya ya Magharibi UWZ Umoja Wa Walemavu Zanzibar VBA Village Based Agro-dealer VICOBA Village Community Bank VSO Volunteer Services Overseas WVC The World Vegetable Center ZEEF Zanzibar Economic Empowerment Fund ZOI Zone of Influence ZTBI Zanzibar Technology and Business Incubator Prepared by Fintrac Inc. ii Feed the Future Tanzania Horticulture Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #7 1. ACTIVITY OVERVIEW/SUMMARY Activity Name: Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda Activity Start Date: January 19, 2017 Activity End Date: January 18, 2021 Name of Prime Fintrac Inc. Implementing Partner: Contract Number: AID-621-C-17-00001 The Tanzania Horticultural Association (TAHA) Zanzibar Economic Empowerment Fund (ZEEF) Tanzania Growth Trust (TGT) Israel Chemicals Ltd. (ICL) Balton Tanzania Ltd. Sai Energy Ltd. Natural Extracts Industries Ltd. Syngenta Tanzania Lima Kwanza Ltd. (LK) Regina Seeds Ltd. Rijk Zwaan Name of Subcontractors/ Agronomos Sin Fronteras (ASF) Sub awardees: East Africa Seeds (EAS) Integrated Rural Development Organization (IRDO) Tanzania Home Economics Association (TAHEA) The World Vegetable Center (WVC) Tanzanice Agrofoods Company Suba Agro Trading and Engineering Company (SATEC) Ecumenical Church Loan Fund Ltd. (ECLOF) Iringa Hope Joint Enterprise SACCOS Ltd. (Iringa HOPE) Mafinga SACCOS MUCOBA Bank PLC (MUCOBA) Rungwe Small Holder Tea Growers Association SACCOS (RSTGA) Other Major Counterpart Local governments from Zanzibar and Morogoro, Iringa, Mbeya and Organizations Songwe Regions Morogoro (Morogoro Rural, Kilosa, Mvomero, Morogoro Urban), Iringa (Mufindi, Kilolo, Iringa Urban, Iringa Rural), Songwe (Mbozi, Geographic Coverage Ileje, Momba), and Mbeya (Rungwe, Busokelo, Mbarali, Mbeya Rural, (Districts, Regions and or Mbeya City) Regions (Part of the Southern Agricultural Growth Zanzibar) Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT); and Zanzibar islands of Unguja (Kazkazini A, Kazkazini B, Kati, Kusini, Magharibi, Mjini) and Pemba (Wete, Micheweni, Chakechake, Mkoani). Reporting Period: October 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018 1.1 Executive Summary The Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda Activity (FTFT-MnM) is a four-year initiative (January 2017-January 2021) funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The purpose of FTFT-MnM is to increase the productivity and profitability of horticulture value chains while integrating large numbers of women and youth and improving the nutritional status of Tanzanians. The activity achieves this by: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. 1 Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #7 Scaling nutrition-sensitive improved technologies and practices that lead to increased productivity of women, men, and youth. Scaling market system models that serve as platforms for technology scaling, while enabling women, men, and youth to access resources needed to improve productivity and profitability. Strengthening the overall capacity of the horticulture subsector through investments all along the value chain. The geographic scope of FTFT-MnM encompasses 16 districts in the mainland within the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania
Recommended publications
  • USAID Tanzania Activity Briefer May 2020
    TANZANIA ACTIVITY BRIEFER MAY 2020 For over five decades, the United States has partnered with the people of Tanzania to advance shared development objectives. The goal of USAID assistance is to help the country achieve self- reliance by promoting a healthy, prosperous, democratic, well- governed, and secure Tanzania. Through partnerships and investments that save lives, reduce poverty, and strengthen democratic governance, USAID’s programs advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous Tanzania. In Tanzania, USAID engages in activities across four areas: ● Economic growth, including trade, agriculture, food security, and natural resource management ● Democracy, human rights, and governance ● Education ● Global health LARRIEUX/ USAID ALEX ALEX ECONOMIC GROWTH OVERVIEW: USAID supports Tanzania’s economic development and goal to become a self-reliant, middle- income country by 2025. We partner with the government and people of Tanzania, the private sector, and a range of development stakeholders. Agriculture plays a vital role in Tanzania’s economy, employing 65 percent of the workforce and contributing to nearly 30 percent of the economy. USAID strengthens the agriculture policy environment and works directly with actors along the production process to improve livelihoods and trade. At the same time, we strengthen the ability of rural communities to live healthy, productive lives through activities that improve 1 nutrition and provide access to clean water and better sanitation and hygiene. We also enhance the voices of youth and women in decision making by building leadership skills and access to assets, such as loans and land ownership rights. As Tanzania’s natural resources are the foundation for the country’s development, we work to protect globally important wildlife, remarkable ecosystems, and extraordinary natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • National Investment Profile Water for Agriculture and Energy -Final Draft
    NATIONAL INVESTMENT PROFILE WATER FOR AGRICULTURE AND ENERGY -FINAL DRAFT- TANZANIA National Investment Profile. Water for Agriculture and Energy: Tanzania EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tanzania’s vision for using water resources for agriculture and energy are firmly embedded in both irrigation and hydropower development policies respectively. These issues are both part of the Tanzania poverty eradication agenda in line with the Tanzania Development Vision 2025 and the five year National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty, commonly known as MKUKUTA I (2005-2010) and MKUKUTA II (2010-2015) which is currently underway. The key policies which are followed for agriculture and hydropower are further supported by the Continental movement towards Africa’s Green revolution. Tanzania has signed the Comprehensive Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) compact and has initiated a number of programs and reforms to increase the investment in the agricultural sector. These programs have a strong emphasis on irrigation. Despite a total irrigation development potential in Tanzania of 29.4 million ha, only 450 392 ha have been irrigated thus demonstrating the need to develop the sector. Furthermore, irrigation practices in Tanzania show low water use efficiency, low water productivity and over dependency on surface water as a major source for irrigation development. The increased investment via the CAADP Compact should be able to support the development of the sector. Hydropower in the country contributes almost 50 percent of the energy produced. On a large scale, hydropower is being developed as a combined hydro-thermal system. On a smaller scale, hydropower is used as a source of renewable energy and a way to increase rural electrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Humanitarian Situation Report
    UNICEF Tanzania Situation Report July-August 2018 Tanzania Humanitarian Situation Report ia/2018/NRC ©UNICEF Tanzan ©UNICEF HIGHLIGHTS SITUATION IN NUMBERS • UNICEF supported the vaccination of over 5,500 under-5 refugee 298,201 children (966 Congolese; 4,576 Burundians) against polio and # of refugees and asylum seekers, measles. Burundians and Congolese, in three camps • Between July and August 2018, 7,541 unaccompanied and separated (UNHCR, 31 July 2018) children have received child protection assistance from Plan International and the International Rescue Committee (IRC) through 160,931 (54 per cent) UNICEF support. # of refugee children requiring humanitarian • A high-level visit of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) Assistant High assistance Commissioner for Protection took place in August focusing on voluntary repatriation and maintaining asylum space in Tanzania. 59,604 (20 per cent) # of under 5 children living in the three UNICEF’s Response with Partners refugee camps Burundian Congolese 44,075 Total Refugees Refugees Total target results # of refugees voluntarily returned to Burundi Burundians UNICEF UNICEF Burundians of the 74,561 registered as of 17 August Results Results and 2018 2018 and 2018 to date* to Date Congolese Target Target Congolese WASH: Refugees and host community members 131,250 162,619 54,103 41,204 185,353 203,823 provided with safe water per agreed standards Education: School-aged children including 95,000 59,092* 36,290 52,140 131,290 111,232 adolescents accessing quality education Health: Child under five years vaccinated against 32,000 18,363 3,500 4,300 35,500 22,663 measles and polio Nutrition: Children under 5 years with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) 2,104 1,154 459 259 2,563 1,413 admitted to therapeutic services Nutrition: Children under 5 provided with micronutrient 53,439 41,536 13,959 12,979 67,398 54,515 supplementation Child Protection: 100% of Cumulative results from January to August 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Baseline Study Report Vol. 2 Table of Contents Items Pages 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Study rationale and objective 4 2. Description of the study area 5 2.1. Location of the study areas 5 2.2. Institutional set-up 7 3. Literature review 8 3.1. Paradigm shift 8 4. Discussion of monitoring indicators 11 4.1. Identification 12 4.2. Measurement 13 5. Methodology 13 5.1. Data type and source 14 5.2. Primary data collection 14 5.2.1. Sampling methods 14 5.2.1.1. Data collection instruments 15 5.2.1.2. Key informants 16 5.3. Data analysis 17 5.3.1. Participatory rural appraisal (pra) 17 5.3.2. Structured surveyed 17 5.3.3. GIS data 17 6. Findings 17 6.1. Situation analysis 17 6.2. Level of development of wmas 21 6.3. Social aspects 22 6.3.1. Location and size: 22 6.3.2. Population 25 6.3.3. Natural resources: 30 6.3.4. Taboos and Rituals Related to Natural Resources Conservation 31 6.3.5. Village governments: 34 Wami-Mbiki WMA i Baseline Study Report Vol. 2 6.3.6. Village government office: 36 6.3.7. Existing community based organizations: 38 6.3.8. Knowledge of the wma concept: 40 6.3.9. Wildlife related court cases: 42 6.3.10. Collaboration with other stakeholders: 44 6.3.11. Social services 46 6.3.12. Community solidarity 52 6.4. Economic aspects 54 6.4..1. Economic services 54 6.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • To Sell Or Not to Sell – Maasai Milk Marketing in Ngerengere, Tanzania
    African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Volume 9 Number 2 pages 106-118 To sell or not to sell – Maasai milk marketing in Ngerengere, Tanzania Tim K Loos* University of Hohenheim (490a), Stuttgart, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Manfred Zeller University of Hohenheim (490a), Stuttgart, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract In Maasai culture, responsibilities and labour are divided between the genders. Men are in charge of the herd and thus control the main income source. Women take care of the family and are responsible for milking. Milk sales provide the women’s main income source. In this paper, using olmarei- (= household) and enkaji- (= sub-household) data from the milk catchment area of a collection centre in Ngerengere, Tanzania, we assess the potential impact of milk sales on enkaji income. We estimate the effect by employing propensity score-matching procedures. Our findings suggest that milk sellers earn significantly higher average income per capita than non-sellers. This appears to be especially true for enkajijik selling milk to other buyers rather than to the collection centre. Other buyers reach more remote areas, usually offer higher prices, but only purchase limited amounts of milk. The collection centre, on the other hand, is a guaranteed market with large capacity. Keywords: milk sales; income effect; propensity score matching; Maasai; Tanzania 1. Introduction Livestock are one of the major agricultural sub-sectors in Tanzania. Its contribution to the national gross domestic product is estimated at 4.7%, of which about one third is attributed to the dairy sector (URT 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Analysis for Village Land Use Planning in Tanzania's
    A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project ILRI PROJECT REPORT ISBN: 92-9146-586-0 The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food and nutritional security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for efficient, safe and sustainable use of livestock. Co-hosted by Kenya and Ethiopia, it has regional or country offices and projects in East, South and Southeast Asia as well as Central, East, Southern and West Africa. ilri.org CGIAR is a global agricultural research partnership for a food-secure future. Its research is carried out by 15 research centres in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. cgiar.org A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania i ii A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project Emmanuel Sulle and Wilbard Mkama Editor: Fiona Flintan (International Livestock Research Institute) July 2019 A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania iii ©2019 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Algal Blooms in Aquaculture Systems in Ngerengere Catchment, Morogoro, Tanzania: Stakeholder’S Experiences and Perception
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Harmful Algal Blooms in Aquaculture Systems in Ngerengere Catchment, Morogoro, Tanzania: Stakeholder’s Experiences and Perception Offoro Neema Kimambo 1,2,*, Jabulani Ray Gumbo 3 , Hector Chikoore 4 and Titus Alfred Makudali Msagati 5 1 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, Solomon Mahlangu College of Science & Education, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro 67115, Tanzania 2 Department of Ecology & Resource Management, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa 3 Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa; [email protected] 4 Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North-West University, Vanserdbijlpark 1900, South Africa; [email protected] 5 College of Science, Engineering & Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The aquaculture sector has experienced fast growth as a result of livelihood diversification initiatives among small-scale farmers in Tanzania. Regrettably, the dynamics of harmful algal blooms Citation: Kimambo, O.N.; Gumbo, (HABs) have been overlooked despite the noticeable forcing of climate variability, the interaction J.R.; Chikoore, H.; Msagati, T.A.M. between social-economic activities, and domestic water supply reservoirs. This study aimed at Harmful Algal Blooms in surveying the occurrence, experiences, and perceptions of HABs in aquaculture systems from Aquaculture Systems in Ngerengere stakeholders in the Ngerengere catchment, Morogoro, Tanzania. A cross-sectional survey focus Catchment, Morogoro, Tanzania: group discussion (FDG), key informant interviews, and anecdotal observation were adopted. A Stakeholder’s Experiences and convenient and purposive sample population was drawn from pond owners, registered water users, Perception.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Policy Framework (Rpf) for Proposed 340Km Mbeya –Tunduma–Sumbawanga 400Kv Transmission
    RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK (RPF) FOR PROPOSED 340KM MBEYA –TUNDUMA–SUMBAWANGA 400KV TRANSMISSION Public Disclosure Authorized LINE AND ~4KM TUNDUMA SUBSTATION TO TANZANIA-ZAMBIA BORDER 330KV TRANSMISSION LINE AND ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION AT TUNDUMA AND SUMBAWANGA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME I: MAIN RPF REPORT PROJECT PROPONENT: Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO), Umeme Park, Ubungo Area, P.O. Box 9024, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Tel: +255 22 2451133, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized PREPARED BY: Ms. Elizabeth J. Aisu Individual Consultant, P.O. Box 20177 Kampala-Uganda Tel: +256 772 616 489, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] 14th April, 2018 LIST OF EXPERTS The following experts were involved during preparation of this Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for Mbeya-Tunduma-Sumbawanga 400kV Power TL and ~4km of segment of 330kV TL from Tunduma Substation to TanZam border as part of study team: S/N NAME EXPERTISE 1. Ms. Elizabeth Aisu RAP and RPF specialist –Team Leader 2. Ms. Vaileth Kimaro Sociologist 3. Mr. Fikirini M. Mtandika Environmentalist 4. Mr. Izaria Luvanda Land Surveyor 5. District Valuers, District Land Officers and All District where proposed TL traversed District Community Development Officers i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of experts ............................................................................................................................. i Table of contents .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Business Report 2015
    LEGALLEGAL AND AND HUMAN HUMAN RIGHTS RIGHTS CENTRE CENTRE HUMANHUMAN RIGHTS RIGHTS AND AND BUSINESS BUSINESS REPORT REPORT OF 2015 2015 Taking Stock of Labour Rights, Land Rights, Gender, Taxation, Corporate Accountability,Taking Stock Environmental of Labour Justice Rights, and Performance Land Rights, of Regulatory Gender, Authorities Taxation, Corporate Accountability, Environmental Justice and Performance of Regulatory Authorities LEGAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE HUMAN RIGHTS AND BUSINESS REPORT 2015 PUBLISHER Legal and Human Rights Centre Justice Lugakingira House, Kijitonyama P.O Box 75254, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Tel.: +255222773038/48 Fax: +255222773037 Email: [email protected] Website: www.humanrights.or.tz PARTNERS ISBN:978-9987-740-26-0 © July, 2016 ii ii EDITORIAL BOARD Dr. Helen Kijo-Bisimba, Adv. Imelda Lulu Urrio Adv. Anna Henga Ms. Felista Mauya Mr. Castor Kalemera RESEARCH COORDINATOR Adv. Masud George ASSISTANT RESEARCHERS 29 Assistant Researchers 14 Field Enumerators REPORT WRITER Adv. Clarence Kipobota LAYOUT & DESIGN Mr. Rodrick Maro Important Message of the Year 2015 LHRC endorses the United Nations’ call to all nations (and everyone) to promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, with full and productive employment and decent work for all as it is implied under Goal 8 of the United Nations Strategic Development Goals (SDGs) 2030. iii iii DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed by the sampled respondents in this report do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC). Therefore, no mention of any authority, organization, company or individual shall imply any approval as to official standing of the matters which have implicated them. The illustrations used by inferring some of the respondents are for guiding the said analysis and discussion only, and not constitute the conclusive opinion on part of LHRC.
    [Show full text]
  • Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga Na Matunda
    FEED THE FUTURE TANZANIA MBOGA NA MATUNDA Quarterly Report # 5 April 1 - June 30, 2018 Feed the Future Tanzania Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #5 Fintrac Inc. www.fintrac.com [email protected] US Virgin Islands 3077 Kronprindsens Gade 72 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Tel: (340) 776-7600 Fax: (340) 776-7601 Washington, DC 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel: (202) 462-8475 Fax: (202) 462-8478 Feed the Future Mboga na Matunda (FTFT-MnM) P.O Box 13121, Plot No. 37 Mlandege Street | Mikocheni B Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Cover photo: Members of the Mahoho and Kilimo Kwanza farmer groups in Mbarali, Mbeya showcasing their harvested tomato. All photos by Fintrac Inc. Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Feed the Future Tanzania Horticulture Mboga na Matunda | Quarterly Report #5 CONTENTS ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................ i 1. ACTIVITY OVERVIEW/SUMMARY ........................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Summary of Results for this Quarter ........................................................................... 2 1.3 Evaluation/Assessment Status and/or Plans................................................................. 9 2. ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS ....................................................... 10 2.1 Progress Narrative ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMME Improving Farmers' Access to And
    CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMME Improving farmers’ access to and management of disease resistant cultivars in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania – Phase 2 R 8406 (ZA 0634) FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1 April 2005 – 31 January 2006 Nick G. Lyimo Uyole Agricultural Research Institute Date FTR completed: 24 February 2006 "This publication is an output from a research project funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID.” R8406: Improving farmers’ access to and management of disease resistant maize cultivars in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Crop Protection Programme. Acronyms and Abbreviations ADP Mbozi Agricultural Development Programme Mbozi Trust Fund AMSDP Agricultural Marketing Sector Development Programme ARI Agricultural Research Institute ASDP Agricultural Sector Development Programme ASPS Agricultural Sector Programme Support CPHP Crop Post Harvest Programme CPP Crop Protection Programme CSC Council Standing Committee DADS District Agricultural Development Strategy DAEO District Agricultural Extension Officer DALDO District Agricultural and Livestock Development Officer DC District Commissioner DE District Economist DED District Executive Director DFID Department for International Development DFT District Facilitation Team FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FCM Full Council Meeting FFS Farmer Field School FIPS Farm Inputs Promoters GLS Grey Leaf Spot GTZ German Technical Cooperation HSG Highland Seed Growers IFAD
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Bringing Nutrition to Scale Project in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe
    Evaluation of the Bringing Nutrition to Scale Project in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe Regions (2013–2017) Evaluation Report 23 April 2018 Prepared by Stephen Turner (Team Leader) Bjorn Ljungqvist Joyce Kinabo Jim Grabham Proposal contacts: Evaluation of Bringing Nutrition to Scale in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER The evaluation team are grateful to the nutrition colleagues at the UNICEF Country Office in Dar es Salaam and the Sub-office in Mbeya for all their support in providing information and facilitating meetings throughout this assignment. Quality support for the evaluation has been provided by the QS team assigned to the evaluation: Stephen Anderson (Food Economy Group) and Stephen Lister (Mokoro Ltd). The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The designations employed, maps and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNICEF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. ii Evaluation of Bringing Nutrition to Scale in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe Contents Summary v 1. Introduction __________________________________________________ 1 1.1. Evaluation purpose and scope ___________________________________ 1 1.2. Country context ______________________________________________ 1 1.3. Nutrition in Tanzania and the project area __________________________ 2 2. The BNTS and ASRP projects _____________________________________ 5 2.1. Project description ____________________________________________ 5 2.2. Key stakeholders and linkages ___________________________________ 8 2.3. Summary of reported performance ______________________________ 10 3. Approach and methods _________________________________________ 11 3.1. Evaluation approach __________________________________________ 11 3.2.
    [Show full text]