British Campaigns in the Nearer East, 1914-1918

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British Campaigns in the Nearer East, 1914-1918 tl^ •••(•••••it^p" Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/britishcampaigns02dane • ;.' . / CLIVEDEN LIBRARY Shelf Ct-^^'^IM^ Number -r^ Date taJL^L- ? '\\aldopf ASTOR lancy BRITISH CAMPAIGNS IN THE NEARER EAST WORKS BY EDMUND DANE BRITISH CAMPAIGNS IN THE NEARER EAST. VOL. I. THE DAYS OF ADVER- SITY. BRITISH CAMPAIGNS IN THE NEARER EAST. VOL. IL THE TIDE OF VICTORY. BRITISH CAMPAIGNS IN AFRICA AND THE PACIFIC. 1914-1918. LONDON: RODDER AND STOUOHTON BRITISH CAMPAIGNS IN THE NEARER EAST 4 1 9 — I 9 I 8 1 From the Outbreak of War with Turkey to the Armistice WITH 30 MAPS AND PLANS RY EDMUND DANE Military the Correspondent of "Westminster Gazette''' : Author of ** Hacking Through Belgium,'' ''The Battle of the Rivers," " The Battles in Flanders " &'(. VOL. II THE TIDE OF VICTORY HODDER AND STOUGHTON LONDON NEW YORK TORONTO MCMXIX PREFACE When in recognition of his priceless services in Syria Field Marshal Allenby, early in October 1919, was honoured with the Freedom' of the City of London, his operations were spoken of as a classic example of the military art. The description was just. It is, however, a description applicable with equal justice to the operations of General Maude, and his successor General Marshall, in Mesopotamia, to the operations in the Balkans under the supreme command of General Franchet d'Esperey, and to the strategy and tactics, alike in defence and attack, directed by General Diaz in Italy. In Mesopotamia and in Syria the main burden was borne by British troops ; in the Balkans and in Italy they played a part subordinate indeed, but useful to the Allies and honourable to their o\vn renown in arms. It was fortunate for the Allies opposed to the Pan- Germanic Confederacy that in all these theatres of hostilities they discovered and entrusted their affairs in the field to leaders of genius. The dictum that it is generals who win or lose battles is one the Great War has but served increasingly to confirm. And the reason is not far to seek. The methods of a man of genius are always sane and simple. More surely than men of less calibre he follows the line of least resistance, and, certain in his judgment and clear as to his aims, applies his mind to those details of preparation and adminis- tration which spell endurance, efficiency, and sustained moral. East as well as West the Allies had to deal with a skilful, resourceful, and above all determined foe. viii PREFACE They not only as time went on better appreciated the supreme value of leadership in war, but the necessity, not less indispensable, of complete preparation and sound administration. The lesson of the Days of Adversity was the danger of entrusting rather to mechanism than to mind, and the failure which attends crudity and haste. By 1916, and not a little owing to the serious checks met with in the East, that lesson had been brought home. Then, slowly at first, but steadily, the tide turned. Here the flow of the tide is followed in the succession of events. The first decisive breach in the hostile front occurred in Mesopotamia. It was emphasised by the Turkish-German debacle in Syria. Then in quick succession came the Bulgarian rout in the Balkans and the Austrian overthrow in Italy. The wind-up was Marshall's brilliant victory at Kalaat Shergat. Various personal and other narratives of one or another of these campaigns have appeared, and few are without their interest. The aim in these pages has been to set out faithfully the teachings which the campaigns embody and to elucidate their relationship, and the reader must judge as to how far that aim has been ful- filled. K. D. London, Oct. 1919. ——- CONTENTS CHAPTER I PASF, THE SALONICA AND EGYPTIAN CAMPAIGNS OF 1916 1 Strategical reasons for the Allied occupation of Salonica Belated attempt to aid Serbia—The role of Bulgaria German influences at Athens—Proposed Allied junction with the Serbian army impracticable—Organisation of the Salonica position—Repulse of the Bulgarians—Situation at the beginning of 1916—Surrender of the Struma pass Enforcement of Greek demobilisation—Formation of a Greek Pro\asional Government in Macedonia and the islands—Abdication of Constantino—The Allied autumn offensive of 1916—Capture of Kamakchalan and Monastir —Political and strategical consequences—Xhe Senussi of _Spllum—His hostility—War declared against him—Opera Jtions on the Westein Egyptian frontier—Action at Beit JHLussein—Battle of Gebel Medwa—Defeat of the Senussi's forces at Halazin—British advance upon Solium and jeo.ccupation of that place—The exploit of the Armoured Car Detachment—Close of the Western Egyptian campa|ign —Renewal of enemy attacks in Sinai—The second German- Turkish Expedition—Battle at Mahemdia. CHAPTER II THE RECAPTURE OF KUT AND THE TAKING OF BAGDAD 23 Sir Stanley Maude appointed to the Mesopotamia Command Decides upon an offensive—Reasons for it—The prepara- tions—British Staff and Administrative work—Improve- ment of the River Transport and other Services—Movement of Reinforcements up the Tigris—Enemy's coimter-measures —Strength of the defences rovmd Kut—Maude's strategy British cross the Shatt-el-Hai—Threat to the Turkish right- rear—Bombardment at Sanna-i-yat—Enemy defences east of the Hai captured—Defences astride of the Hai stormed Assault on the Dahri bend defences— British attacks at —— CONTENTS PAC4E Sanna-i-yat—Enemy's dilemma—Capture of the Shumran bend, the key of Kut—Turks evacuate the town—The British pursuit—Destruction of the enemy's river flotilla British advance to Zana—Advance to Ctesiphon—The Diala reached, March 7, 1917—Change in British tactics The defence out-manoeuvred— Bagdad railway terminus occupied—Crossing of the Diala—Turkish retreat—British defensive crippled. entry into Bagdad (March 1 1 )—Turkish CHAPTER III MESOPOTAMIA CAMPAIGN AFTER THE CAPTURE OF BAGDAD 48 Efiects of the Turkish reverses—Arab rising in the Yemen C4eneral Maude's energetic measures—Advance up the Tigris—Cobbe's victory at Mushadiya—Advance along the Diala—Bakuba occupied—Marshall's operations on the Euphrates and capture of Feludja—Action on the Jebel Hamrin ridge—^Turkish reaction—Combined movement against Deltawa—Maude's successful stratagem—Turks defeated—British victory at Istabulat—Capture of Samarra —The health and efficiency of the army—First operations against Ramadie—Why indecisive—Second Expedition Battle of Ramadie—Capture of the Turkish force—Cavalry dash to Mendali—Results of British administration in Mesopotamia—Maude's death at Bagdad. CHAPTER IV THE CAMPAIGN IN SYRIA : JANUARY TO OCTOBER, 1917 68 Offensive in support of Mesopotamia operations—Battle of El Arish—British advance to Rafa—Physical featiures of south- em Syria—Turkish defences in Palestine—Haste of the British preparations—First British attack upon Gaza Reasons for its defeat—Plans of General Allenby—Their daring—Naval co-operation—Three months of preparation —Mastery of the physical difficulties of Sinai—The water problem—Increase of the British Expeditionary Force Enemy's counter-moves. CHAPTER V THE VICTORIES OF BEERSHEBA AND GAZA . 88 General Allenby's turning movement—The counter-projects of von Falkenhayn—British bombardment of Gaza defences —— CONTENTS xi PAOE German Staff outwitted—The Beersheba defences—The British assault—Its complete success—Daring charge of AustraHon Light Horse—Enemy panic and failure to des- troy the wells—Dash of the turning movement—British attack at Gaza—Rapid advance from Beersheba—Opera- tions at Tel Kuweilfe—Breach of the hostile fortified front Advance to Sheria—Enemy evacuation of Gaza—State of tlie town—Skill and boldness of the British movements. CHAPTER VI THE TAKIXG OF JERUSALEM 98 Military aims of the British pursuit—Struggle of the Turks to escape capture—Combat at Wadi Hesi—Gallantry of the Lowland Division—Combats at Hu.j —Notable work of Irish troops—Convergence of the British thrusts—Intrepid charge of Yeomanry—Transport and water difficulties—Attempted enemy reaction—Battle of El Kubab—Capture of Jaffa Movement from the coast upon Jerusalem—Fighting in the passes—A battle in a fog—Seizure of the Nebi Samwal ridge —Rapidity and effect of the British moves—Plan of opera- tions round Jerusalem—Gallantry of the 60th and 74th Divi- sions—Defences west of the city taken—March of the Welsh Division from Hebron—Turkish measures against the Jews—Enemy panic—Last acts of the Turks in Jerusa- lem—Evacuation scenes—The surrender—Mob loots the Turkish barracks—General Allenby's entry—A curious prophecy—Popular rejoicings—Military effects of the fall of Jerusalem. CHAPTER VII THE GERMAN-TURKISH REACTION IN SYRIA . 113 Position in Syria at the end of 1917—German-Turkish measures of separation—General Allenby strikes first—Attack north of Jaffa—German-Turkish counter-move against Jerusalem —The most obstinate battle of the Campaign—Causes of the enemy's failure—British operations east of Jordan—The capture of Jericho—Value of capacity in command—Opera- tions of the Arab forces—The Britisli raid on Ammam Difficulties at the Jordan fords—Battle at Ammam—Non- success of the British project—Advance of the IVth Turkish Army lo the Jordan—New British plans—The checks at Shumet Nimrin and Es Salt—Disintegration of the British Expeditionary Force—Effects of the changes. —— xii CONTENTS CHAPTER VIII PAGE THE TURKISH OVERTHROW 134 Re-or<^anisation of the British forces—Strengths of the com- batants—The Hnes of the new British offensive—Reasons for the scheme—Its boldness—German-Turkish precautions General Allenby's ruses—Opening of the attack on the hos- tile right—Rupture of the enemy's front—The dash north of the Mounted troops—Combat at El Lejjun—Capture of El Fule, and of the enemy headquarters at Nazareth Flight of Liman von Sandars—Occupation of Beisan—^The enemy forces west of Jordan entrapped—Efforts of the Vllth Turkish Army to get out—The British converging pressure—The Turkish debdcle.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix F Ottoman Casualties
    ORDERED TO DIE Recent Titles in Contributions in Military Studies Jerome Bonaparte: The War Years, 1800-1815 Glenn J. Lamar Toward a Revolution in Military Affairs9: Defense and Security at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century Thierry Gongora and Harald von RiekhojJ, editors Rolling the Iron Dice: Historical Analogies and Decisions to Use Military Force in Regional Contingencies Scot Macdonald To Acknowledge a War: The Korean War in American Memory Paid M. Edwards Implosion: Downsizing the U.S. Military, 1987-2015 Bart Brasher From Ice-Breaker to Missile Boat: The Evolution of Israel's Naval Strategy Mo she Tzalel Creating an American Lake: United States Imperialism and Strategic Security in the Pacific Basin, 1945-1947 Hal M. Friedman Native vs. Settler: Ethnic Conflict in Israel/Palestine, Northern Ireland, and South Africa Thomas G. Mitchell Battling for Bombers: The U.S. Air Force Fights for Its Modern Strategic Aircraft Programs Frank P. Donnini The Formative Influences, Theones, and Campaigns of the Archduke Carl of Austria Lee Eystnrlid Great Captains of Antiquity Richard A. Gabriel Doctrine Under Trial: American Artillery Employment in World War I Mark E. Grotelueschen ORDERED TO DIE A History of the Ottoman Army in the First World War Edward J. Erickson Foreword by General Huseyin Kivrikoglu Contributions in Military Studies, Number 201 GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Erickson, Edward J., 1950— Ordered to die : a history of the Ottoman army in the first World War / Edward J. Erickson, foreword by General Htiseyin Kivrikoglu p. cm.—(Contributions in military studies, ISSN 0883-6884 ; no.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forgotten Siege the Kutul Amare Victory and the British Soldiers in Yozgat City
    Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies 2020; 5(3): 46-52 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/tecs doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11 ISSN: 2575-498X (Print); ISSN: 2575-4971 (Online) A Forgotten Siege the Kutul Amare Victory and the British Soldiers in Yozgat City Mehmet Ertug Yavuz The Foreign Languages School, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey Email address: To cite this article: Mehmet Ertug Yavuz. A Forgotten Siege the Kutul Amare Victory and the British Soldiers in Yozgat City. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2020, pp. 46-52. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11 Received : June 28, 2019; Accepted : November 6, 2019; Published : June 20, 2020 Abstract: Kutul Amare was the second greatest victory won by the Turks during the First World War after Çanakkale This article tells you about the war from an objective perspective, how and why the war was finally politically won by the British, who was in charge at the time, how did the war progressed and how certain things changed during the time of this war, the imprisoning of the British soldiers in Yozgat City, This is what exactly makes this war so important and interesting. The (weak/ill-so called by the Europeans at those times) Ottoman forces withdrew and reinforced “Selman-i Pak”, under the command of Colonel 'Bearded Nurettin Bey'. While the reinforcement continued, Mirliva-the Major General- Halil Pasha the Uncle of Enver Pasa, entered the frontline with a corps and changed the course of the battle. General Townshend, with 4500 loss regressed to Kutu'l-Amare.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Ghosts
    Colonial ideas, modern warfare: how British perceptions affected their campaign against the Ottomans, 1914-1916 by Cameron Winter A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Cameron Winter, April, 2017 ABSTRACT COLONIAL IDEAS, MODERN WARFARE: HOW BRITISH PERCEPTIONS AFFECTED THEIR CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE OTTOMANS, 1914-1916 Cameron Winter Advisor: University of Guelph, 2017 Professor R Worringer This thesis is an investigation of British campaign against the Ottoman Sultanate during the first two years of WWI. Despite Britain’s purported superiority in all things military and technological, the Ottomans dealt the British several stinging reverses at the Dardanelles and in Mesopotamia, culminating in the capture of a British division at Kut. It is the argument of this thesis that these failures on the part of the British were the direct result of Britain’s colonialist attitudes towards Muslims, and that a reading of both the secondary literature and available primary materials demonstrates this thoroughly. By examining memoirs, diaries, cabinet documents and minutes of War Council meetings, it becomes clear that Lord Kitchener, Winston Churchill, Austen Chamberlain, and other British leaders suffered from a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of Islam and of the Ottoman Army, and that this misunderstanding underwrote all of their subsequent failures over the 1914-1916 period. iii Table of Contents Introduction: One Debacle
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the MS-236: Bernard Peace WWI Photograph Album
    ________________________________________________________________________ Guide to the MS-236: Bernard Peace WWI Photograph Album Kelly Murphy ‘21, Ester Kenyon Fortenbaugh ’46 Intern February 2019 MS – 236: Bernard Peace WWI Photograph Album 1 box, .175 cubic feet Inclusive Dates: 1917-1919 Processed by: Kelly Murphy, Ester Kenyon Fortenbaugh ’46 Intern (February 2019) Provenance This photo album was purchased from Between the Covers in 2016. Biographical Note Bernard Peace was born in 1884 and lived in Lockwood, a suburb of Huddersfield, England when he enlisted in the British Army. In September 1916, Private Peace completed basic training and was placed in the Duke of Wellington’s West Riding Regiment, which mainly saw action on the Western Front. In February 1917 he was transferred to the Territorial Forces and stationed in Baghdad after its capture in March 1917. Between his arrival and his transfer home in April 1919 he stayed in Baghdad and traveled to other areas of Iraq and India when permitted. After arriving in Great Britain in November, he was transferred to the Class Z Reserve in Huddersfield.1 Although not much is known about the rest of his life, it can be presumed he left the army after the Class Z Reserve was disbanded. Historical Note The Middle Eastern theater of World War I was mainly fought between Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire. Since the Ottoman Empire was considered the weakest of the Central Powers, the British and French believed that they would be the easiest to defeat, and launched a failed naval attack on Gallipoli in 1914. They then decided on a land campaign led by the British and their colonial troops from India.
    [Show full text]
  • Allenby's Military Medicine
    ALLENBY’S MILITARY MEDICINE Life and Death in World War I Palestine eran dolev.indd 1 4/19/2007 10:35:13 eran dolev.indd 2 1/24/2007 12:55:44 ALLENBY’S MILITARY MEDICINE Life and Death in World War I Palestine ERAN DOLEV eran dolev.indd 3 4/19/2007 10:35:37 Published in 2007 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com In the United States of America and Canada distributed by Palgrave Macmillan a division of St. Martin’s Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © 2007 Eran Dolev The right of Eran Dolev to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by the author in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. International Library of Colonial History 6 ISBN: 978 1 84511 290 5 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library A full CIP record is available from the Library of Congress Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: available Printed and bound by Thomson Press India Limited From camera-ready copy edited and supplied by the author Contents Foreword by Major General Louis Lillywhite vii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Prologue 1 Chapter 1: Military Medicine during the Great War 5 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ILL-FATED’ SONS OF THE ‘NATION’: OTTOMAN PRISONERS OF WAR IN RUSSIA AND EGYPT, 1914-1922 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Yucel Yarukdag.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © 2016 by Bonnie Rose Hudson
    Copyright © 2016 by Bonnie Rose Hudson Select graphics used by permission of Teachers Resource Force. All Rights Reserved. This book may not be reproduced or transmitted by any means, including graphic, electronic, or mechanical, without the express written consent of the author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews and those uses expressly described in the following Terms of Use. You are welcome to link back to the author’s website, http://writebonnierose.com, but may not link directly to the PDF file. You may not alter this work, sell or distribute it in any way, host this file on your own website, or upload it to a shared website. Terms of Use: For use by a family, this unit can be printed and copied as many times as needed. Classroom teachers may reproduce one copy for each student in his or her class. Members of co-ops or workshops may reproduce one copy for up to fifteen children. This material cannot be resold or used in any way for commercial purposes. Please contact the publisher with any questions. ©Bonnie Rose Hudson WriteBonnieRose.com 2 World War I Notebooking Unit The World War I Notebooking Unit is a way to help your children explore World War I in a way that is easy to personalize for your family and interests. In the front portion of this unit you will find: How to use this unit List of 168 World War I battles and engagements in no specific order Maps for areas where one or more major engagements occurred Notebooking page templates for your children to use In the second portion of the unit, you will find a list of the battles by year to help you customize the unit to fit your family’s needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman Empire During World War One
    - 257 - Bi-Annual Research Journal “BALOCHISTAN REVIEW” ISSN 1810-2174 Balochistan Study Centre, University of Balochistan, Quetta (Pakistan) VOL. XXXVIII NO. 1, 2018 Ottoman Empire During World War One Abdul Qadir1, Dr. Mirwais Kasi2 Zahir Mengal3 & Ms. Hussan Ara Maggasi4 Abstract The World War One led to fierce battles in the Middle East between the Allied power and the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire was dragged into the war by Young Turks and Germany and the empire was not ready for the war. The Ottoman Empire had been in continuous war before the start of World War I and was exhausted. However, the Ottoman Empire fought on several fronts during the World War One and proved herself at the battles of Gallipoli and Kut Al Amara. The Empire was later defeated by the Allies and lost its Middle Eastern Territories. The article has mainly used secondary sources for the research Keywords: Middle East, Ottomans Empire, Young Turks, World War I, Introduction Most people remember World War I as the “Great War” and the war to end all wars. It was the ‘battle of trenches’ and the ceaseless butchering of men on all sides. The Western front is generally remembered as the vital episode of the war. The Middle Eastern theatre of war was also an important episode of the First World War. World War one resulted in the birth of modern Turkey, Palestinian-Israeli conflict has its roots in World War One, the crisis in Iraq, Syria comes from border drawn in WWI, the issue of Kurdistan comes out of WWI (Adeli).
    [Show full text]
  • The Siege of Kut-Al-Amara: at War in Mesopotamia, 1915-1916'
    H-War Wagner on Gardner, 'The Siege of Kut-al-Amara: At War in Mesopotamia, 1915-1916' Review published on Saturday, January 27, 2018 Nikolas Gardner. The Siege of Kut-al-Amara: At War in Mesopotamia, 1915-1916. Twentieth- Century Battles Series. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014. 224 pp. $28.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-253-01384-2. Reviewed by Steven Wagner (Brunel University London)Published on H-War (January, 2018) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=46592 In his new book, Nikolas Gardner provides a comprehensive analysis of the siege of Kut-al-Amara. The book offers a clear and precise narrative retelling alongside a thorough historiographic review of how this story has been told and retold. At focus is the story of how the military failed and how authors have attempted to reconcile one of British military history’s more humbling moments. The book revolves around two principle research questions, as described in the preface. First, it examines the operational performance of Major General Charles Townshend, commander of the 6th (Poona) Division, and the commanders of the relief force against the Ottomans between September 1915 and April 1916. Second, it assesses the response of Indian personnel to the conditions of the siege, since the original evidence and the historiography have discussed this issue as a cause for defeat. By focusing on the origins of the siege rather than the events that followed, Gardner’s assessment offers a convincing and reasonable perspective on both Townshend’s leadership and the performance of Indian troops during the siege and relief operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam and the Great War in the Middle East, 1914–1918
    Journal of the British Academy, 4, 1–20. DOI 10.5871/jba/004.001 Posted 19 January 2016. © The British Academy 2016 Rival jihads: Islam and the Great War in the Middle East, 1914–1918 Elie Kedourie Memorial Lecture read 8 July 2014 EUGENE ROGAN Abstract: The Ottoman Empire, under pressure from its ally Germany, declared a jihad shortly after entering the First World War. The move was calculated to rouse Muslims in the British, French and Russian empires to rebellion. Dismissed at the time and since as a ‘jihad made in Germany’, the Ottoman attempt to turn the Great War into a holy war failed to provoke mass revolt in any part of the Muslim world. Yet, as German Orientalists predicted, the mere threat of such a rebellion, particularly in British India, was enough to force Britain and its allies to divert scarce manpower and materiel away from the main theatre of operations in the Western Front to the Ottoman front. The deepening of Britain’s engagement in the Middle Eastern theatre of war across the four years of World War I can be attributed in large part to combating the threat of jihad. Keywords: Ottoman Empire, Great War, jihad, WWI, Middle East. The Ottoman entry into the First World War should have provoked little or no concern in European capitals. For decades, the West had dismissed the Ottoman Empire as Europe’s sick man.1 Since the late 1870s, the European powers had carved out whole swathes of Ottoman territory for their empires with impunity. The Russians annexed the Caucasian provinces of Kars, Ardahan and Batum in 1878.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10: Great War and Russian Revolution
    132 Chapter 10: Great War and Russian Revolution World War I Summary World War I (WWI or WW1), also known as the First World War or the Great War, was a global war centred in Europe that began on 28 July 1914 and lasted until 11 November 1918. More than 9 million combatants and 7 million civilians died as a result of the war, a casualty rate exacerbated by the belligerents' technological and industrial sophistication, and tactical stalemate. It was one of the deadliest conflicts in history, paving the way for major political changes, including revolutions in many of the nations involved. The war drew in all the world's economic great powers, assembled in two opposing alliances: the Allies (based on the Triple Entente of the United Kingdom, France and the Russian Empire) and the Central Powers of Germany and Austria-Hungary. Although Italy had also been a member of the Triple Alliance alongside Germany and Austria- Hungary, it did not join the Central Powers, as Austria-Hungary had taken the offensive against the terms of the alliance. These alliances were reorganised and expanded as more nations entered the war: Italy, Japan and the United States joined the Allies, and the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria the Central Powers. More than 70 million military personnel, including 60 million Europeans, were mobilised in one of the largest wars in history. The trigger for war was the 28 June 1914 assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir to the throne of Austria- Hungary, by Yugoslav nationalist Gavrilo Princip in Sarajevo. This set off a diplomatic crisis when Austria-Hungary delivered an ultimatum to the Kingdom of Serbia, and entangled international alliances formed over the previous decades were invoked.
    [Show full text]