Littoral Optech – West Edited by Mårten Granberg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Littoral Optech – West Edited by Mårten Granberg Littoral OpTech – West Edited by Mårten Granberg Reprinted from Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet Issue 1/2015 Pages 92-99 Littoral OpTech – West The international naval workshop Littoral OpTech – West, hosted by The Royal Swe- dish Society of Naval Sciences – Kungl. Örlogsmannasällskapet (KÖMS) – in coope- ration with Saab and the Littoral Operations Center of the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, was held in Stockholm Sweden 23rd to 24th September 2014. 92 Reprinted from Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet Issue 1/2015 Day One the Korea War. Dr. Sepp mentioned The Falklands, the Iran/Iraq war and the ope- Welcome addresses were made by The rational difficulties. In the littoral battle Royal Swedish Navy Chief of Staff scene noncombatants are present. It beco- RADM Jan Thörnqvist, Dr. Kalev I. Sepp, mes confused in cluttered littoral regions. Director of the Littoral Operations Cen- Dr. Sepp addressed the question, ter at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, “What can we learn from Sweden and RADM Thomas Engevall (RSwN) Presi- their extreme littoral?” For Sweden it dent of the Royal Swedish Society of Na- is natural to combine land-, sea- and air val Sciences, and CAPT Clark O. Troyer forces to work integrated in the Littorals. (USN), Commanding Officer of the U.S. Dr. Sepp mentioned Swedish experience Office of Naval Research-Global. in adopting Littoral capabilities from his- The keynote address was presented by torical Soviet threat in the cold war. US the Honorable RADM Jay Cohen (USN, and Sweden has worked together earlier ret.), former Chief of the Office of Naval with the submarine Gotland exercise in Research and Under Secretary of Science 2004 - 2005, then USN bought and im- and Technology at the Department of plemented 16 CB-90:s. Dr. Sepp expres- Homeland Security. RADM Cohen high- sed a wish for more cooperation and that lighted the challenges of operating in the we shall remember what we have learnt global littorals, and in particular the ”ex- and not forget. treme littorals” of the Baltic Sea. RADM Dr. Sepp gave brief information about Cohen made a closing remark that ”The U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, NPS. future are The Littorals, the world has NPS is a very good environment to deve- changed. Blue waters will always be lop littoral concepts. 54 different nationa- important for world trade but green and lities among the students that participate brown water will be more important. The in courses, programs and projects. Many combined length of world Littorals are different projects regarding littoral com- the same as the distance from the Earth bat ship, scenarios etc are studied. NPS to the Moon". has the strength and can turn to the pro- Dr. Kalev I. Sepp, Director of the Lit- blems, Dr. Sepp concluded. toral Operations Center at the U.S. Naval CDR Ingo Eilts, German Navy, NATO Postgraduate School gave a presentation Centre of Excellence for Operations about ”The Littorals – Shifting from Blue in Confined and Shallow Waters, COE to Green”. Dr. Sepp gave a brief histori- CSW, at Kiel, gave a presentation about cal review of the US experience of green how the center is organized and their water operations from the Civil War. partnering countries in NATO. Dr. Sepp also mentioned other examp- Dr. Lee Wilett, Editor HIS Jane´s Navy les of complex green water operations International gave a presentation “Over- from WWI and WWII and the difficul- view of Littoral Operations and Techno- ties during these littoral battles. During logies”. Dr. Wilett gave a summary of the Pacific campaign the US and Allies subjects and littoral trends that IHS and gained knowledge and capability in con- Jane´s have been covering in recent years. ducting amphibious battle. The capabi- The workshop consisted of panel di- lity was important a few years later in scussions, interspersed with informal Reprinted from Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet Issue 1/2015 93 networking, with a number of senior mi- ideas and views how to operate in the lit- litary and civilian subject matter experts torals. Do we have common definitions, from Finland, Germany, India, Norway, how about extreme littorals, what define Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom littorals and challenges of tasks matched and the United States. with decreased budgets. The Panel consisted of RADM Jonas Panel discussions Haggren RSwN, CAPT Magnus Jönsson, Panel One: The Littorals – Why do we RSwN, Commander 3. Naval Warfare care Flottila. CAPT Chris Hodkinson, RN, The panel was moderated by CDR Steve Deputy Asst. Chief af Staff – Land & Lit- Benson (USN, ret.), Saab PM Littoral toral Manoeuvre, CDR Carl-Magnus Wa- Operations Center. He made the opening senius, Chief of Staff, Uusimaa Brigade, remarks: “Very little in the world today Finland. escapes the involvement of the Littorals. RADM Bertil Björkman thanked the The Global Littorals are and have been participants for their presentations and since time in memorial dominant geo- led the panel discussion and took ques- graphic feature in human existence. As tions from the audience. RADM Björk- an increasingly interconnected world be- man made a final remark for panel two: comes increasingly reliant on stable con- “We will manage in the future, we will ditions. In the future we have to prepare have the capacity. We have the ambition well for joint and combined operations in to joint operations and combined exerci- the complex Littorals. On the sea, under ses. In total we have the capacity and we the sea, in the air, on land, in space and will do the job”. in cyber space. This preparation across Panel Three – Underwater Operations allies and partners will serve from pre- in The Littorals sence to deterrence and on through war- time. We have highly qualified experts in The panel was moderated by CAPT Bo this panel”. Rask (RSwN ret.), Secretary Royal Swe- The Panel consisted of CAPT Yueksel dish Society of Naval Sciences. Can, Turkish Navy, NATO, COE-CSW, The Panel consisted of RADM J.J. Kiel., Dr. Eric Berglund, Swedish De- Waickwicz (USN ret.), former CO, Na- fence Research Agency, FOI, Dr. Martin val Mine and ASW Ops, 3d Fleet, CAPT Murphy, Naval analysts & Senior Re- Anders Järn RSwN, FXM, Swedish De- search Fellow, Dalhousie University and fence & Security Export Agency, CAPT CAPT Jeff Kline (USN ret.) U.S. Naval Jens Nykvist, RSwN, Commander 1. Postgraduate School. Submarine Flottila, CDR Jonas Hård af Segerstad, RSwN, Commander 42. Mine Panel Two – Operations in the Litto- Countermeasures Squadron. rals – With Allies and Partners. After opening remarks by the modera- The panel was moderated by RADM tor, RADM J.J. Waickwicz made the first Bertil Björkman (RSwN ret.) and Royal presentation for panel three. Swedish Society of Naval Sciences. He RADM Waickwicz told the back- made the opening remarks: The intention ground from the submarine Gotland that with this panel discussion is to present took part for exercises during two years 94 Reprinted from Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet Issue 1/2015 Panel Two- Operations in the Littorals - With Allies and Partners. in the US. The exercises were vital for jects to train. International exercises are USN to maintain antisubmarine skills good, but always evaluate”. and capability. It is essential to reinvent training and Day two bring it to the forefront in order to main- The keynote address was presented by tain capability and know-how. BGEN Ola Truedsson, Commander, RADM Waickwicz expressed that in Swedish Maritime Component Com- the future there is a need of mutual deve- mand, Swedish Armed Forces, Joint lopment of units and capabilities in order HQ. He explained the Swedish view on to save costs. Units can still be adjusted Littoral environment and Littoral Opera- to the own nations need and with own tions. The terrain in which Swedish Navy software and weapon systems. So ins- conducts its operations is very complex. tead of develop own ships for ten years at The complex multidimensional operation high costs, are there similar ships on the area where the Swedish Navy has to have market today? RADM Waickwicz made control and situational awareness in four a final remark, “Lesson learned, increase dimensions: Air, land, surface and sub- training”. surface. CAPT Bo Rask made final remarks: BGEN Truedsson briefed about the “Identify lessons, then implement them, current situation in The Baltic Sea. He otherwise it is not lessons learned. It is also explained current trends and chal- important to keep on training everything, lenges for the Swedish Navy. National especially daily tasks. A good idea could geographical position and national inte- be to invite the crew to innovative sub- rests will be the foundation. Once again Reprinted from Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet Issue 1/2015 95 the Swedish Navy is back to more tra- The battle of Tsushima straight was typi- ditional naval tasks like protecting ship- cal of being an important battle through ping and show presence in own regional out history similar to decisive ones like waters. Cooperation and interoperability Lepanto, Nile, Trafalgar and Jutland. Sir in order to maintain operational capabi- Julian Corbett specified three compo- lity is a key factor for future success. Sig- nents of the Royal Navy: the battle fleet to ning the Host Nation Support agreement defeat any challenge to command of the with NATO for instance. Cooperation sea; “cruisers” to patrol the sea lanes and for cost sharing regarding capability de- protect British trade; and “the flotilla” velopment is another necessary path for of small combatants capable of fighting Sweden. BGEN Truedsson concluded his inshore, where battleships, with all their brief with explaining the importance with offensive firepower, could not venture be- the Swedish Finnish Naval Task Group, cause torpedo boats, submarines and mi- SFNTG. nes. Early in WWI Makaroff and Corbett CAPT Wayne Hughes (USN, ret.), Pro- was proven right when three UK cruisers fessor and Dean Emeritus at the U.S Na- were sunk near the Netherlands coast by val Postgraduate School, author of Fleet German submarines.
Recommended publications
  • The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Jeremy Stöhs
    Jeremy Stöhs ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Jeremy Stöhs is the Deputy Director of the Austrian Center for Intelligence, Propaganda and Security Studies (ACIPSS) and a Non-Resident Fellow at the Institute for Security Policy, HOW HIGH? Kiel University. His research focuses on U.S. and European defence policy, maritime strategy and security, as well as public THE FUTURE OF security and safety. EUROPEAN NAVAL POWER AND THE HIGH-END CHALLENGE ISBN 978875745035-4 DJØF PUBLISHING IN COOPERATION WITH 9 788757 450354 CENTRE FOR MILITARY STUDIES How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Jeremy Stöhs How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Djøf Publishing In cooperation with Centre for Military Studies 2021 Jeremy Stöhs How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge © 2021 by Djøf Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior written permission of the Publisher. This publication is peer reviewed according to the standards set by the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Cover: Morten Lehmkuhl Print: Ecograf Printed in Denmark 2021 ISBN 978-87-574-5035-4 Djøf Publishing Gothersgade 137 1123 København K Telefon: 39 13 55 00 e-mail: [email protected] www. djoef-forlag.dk Editors’ preface The publications of this series present new research on defence and se- curity policy of relevance to Danish and international decision-makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Computing and Operational Command in the Swedish Armed Forces, 1966–1989 Johan Gribbe
    Controlling the Battlefield: Computing and Operational Command in the Swedish Armed Forces, 1966–1989 Johan Gribbe To cite this version: Johan Gribbe. Controlling the Battlefield: Computing and Operational Command in the Swedish Armed Forces, 1966–1989. 3rd History of Nordic Computing (HiNC), Oct 2010, Stockholm, Sweden. pp.22-27, 10.1007/978-3-642-23315-9_3. hal-01564619 HAL Id: hal-01564619 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01564619 Submitted on 19 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Controlling the Battlefield: Computing and Operational Command in the Swedish Armed Forces, 1966−1989 Johan Gribbe Div. of History of Science and Technology, KTH 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] Abstract. In the late 1960s, the Swedish Defence Staff initiated the development of a computerized command and control system that was later to be known as the LEO-system. From the mid-1970s to 1989, more than two hundred million SEK were spent on the project, which involved private computer consultants and with military staff officers acting as project leaders and customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Procurement in Germany
    Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology ·Procurement · ·Armed Forces Politics June 2016 • www.euro-sd.com • ISSN 1617-7983 ES&D in Germany Procurement Defence SPECIAL International International Security and Defence Journal ISSUE June2016 a 7.90 Content Masthead European Security & Defence Special Issue June 2016 ISSN 1617-7983 · www.euro-sd.com 4 Well equipped Published by The Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Mittler Report Verlag GmbH Information Technology and In-Service Support A company of the Tamm Media Group 6 Directorate P Editor-in-Chief: Dr. Peter Bossdorf (pb) Consultant to the executive level, in charge of overall Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Henning Bartels (hb) Managing Editor (Magazine): Stephen Barnard (sb) project control and strategy, and BAAINBw‘s interface Managing Editor (Newsletter): Dorothee Frank (df) to the outside world Industrial Editors: Jürgen Hensel (jh), Gerhard Heiming (gwh), Dieter Stockfisch (ds) Correspondents: Rolf Hilmes (Army Technology), 10 Combat Directorate (K) Peter Preylowski (Airborne Systems) Regional Correspondents: Tamir Eshel (Israel), Tim 15 Air Directorate (L) Guest (UK), Beka Kiria (Georgia), Shinichi Kiyotani (Japan), Yury Laskin (Russia), J. Bo Leimand (Den- mark), Jay Menon (India), Chet Nagle (USA), Luca 19 Sea Directorate (S) Peruzzi (Italy), David Saw (France) Supported by the editorial team of “Europäische Sicherheit & Technik” 25 Land Support Directorate (U) Publishers: Rainer Metzner, Henning Bartels Layout: 31 Information Technology Directorate (I) davis creativ
    [Show full text]
  • Swedish Generals and Colonels in Gray 1861-1865
    Swedish American Genealogist Volume 21 Number 3 Article 5 9-1-2001 Swedish Generals and Colonels in Gray 1861-1865 Bertil Häggman Lars Gjertveit Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/swensonsag Part of the Genealogy Commons, and the Scandinavian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Häggman, Bertil and Gjertveit, Lars (2001) "Swedish Generals and Colonels in Gray 1861-1865," Swedish American Genealogist: Vol. 21 : No. 3 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/swensonsag/vol21/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Swenson Swedish Immigration Research Center at Augustana Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Swedish American Genealogist by an authorized editor of Augustana Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Swedish Generals and ° Colonels in Gray 1861-1865 '·\ Bertil Haggman* and Lars Gjertveu+ Preface At the outbreak of the American Civil War, the U.S. census of 1860 reported 750 Swedes living in what would be the Confederate States of America. Perhaps not more than fifty joined the Confederate army and navy. The full story of all these Swedes in gray remains to be written. This modest booklet is an attempt to introduce higher officers of Swedish origin who were in the Confederate army. Of the two generals, one (Brigadier General Charles G. Dahlgren)· was commissioned by the Governor of Mississippi; the other (Brigadier General Roger W. Hanson), by a Richmond commission . It is the hope of the authors that this little booklet will encourage further research, both in Scandinavia and the United States, into the military careers of these officers and contribute to the celebration this year [1996] in Sweden and the United States of the start of Swedish mass immigration to America in 1846.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Sheet
    TACTICALL NAVY REFERENCES Internal Communication External Communication TactiCall gives you complete control and fast access to all net- TactiCall is a perfect match for Task- or coalition force operations, works on board your vessel. Be it Functional Nets including teleph- including other military arms. SOF teams, air force, marine detach- ony, public address, entertainment systems and the like or Fighting ments and even civil and NGO agencies can be important players Nets handling alarms, broadcasts and orders, weapon teams or in the operation. More often than not, this setup includes a multi- mission control. tude of different frequency bands, networks and radio equipment. TactiCall will integrate all these into one simple and easy to use TactiCall is highly flexible and scalable, it is platform independent solution that permits everybody to reach each other regardless of and will integrate seamlessly into your combat management sys- equipment and technology used. tem of choice. In other words TactiCall lets you control all internal communication on board your vessel and with features such as TactiCall will allow key features for modern day operations like red/ record and playback helps you log and later analyze your commu- black separation, multi-level security operations, global public ad- nication flows. dress and allowing government or task force commanders to com- municate directly with whoever needs to be addressed in a given situation - facilitating a much smoother and more rapid “Statement of No Objections” chain. Contact Porten
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Policy and the Armed Forces During the Pandemic Herunterladen
    1 2 3 2020, Toms Rostoks and Guna Gavrilko In cooperation with the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung With articles by: Thierry Tardy, Michael Jonsson, Dominic Vogel, Elisabeth Braw, Piotr Szyman- ski, Robin Allers, Paal Sigurd Hilde, Jeppe Trautner, Henri Vanhanen and Kalev Stoicesku Language editing: Uldis Brūns Cover design and layout: Ieva Stūre Printed by Jelgavas tipogrāfija Cover photo: Armīns Janiks All rights reserved © Toms Rostoks and Guna Gavrilko © Authors of the articles © Armīns Janiks © Ieva Stūre © Uldis Brūns ISBN 978-9984-9161-8-7 4 Contents Introduction 7 NATO 34 United Kingdom 49 Denmark 62 Germany 80 Poland 95 Latvia 112 Estonia 130 Finland 144 Sweden 160 Norway 173 5 Toms Rostoks is a senior researcher at the Centre for Security and Strategic Research at the National Defence Academy of Latvia. He is also associate professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Univer- sity of Latvia. 6 Introduction Toms Rostoks Defence spending was already on the increase in most NATO and EU member states by early 2020, when the coronavirus epi- demic arrived. Most European countries imposed harsh physical distancing measures to save lives, and an economic downturn then ensued. As the countries of Europe and North America were cau- tiously trying to open up their economies in May 2020, there were questions about the short-term and long-term impact of the coro- navirus pandemic, the most important being whether the spread of the virus would intensify after the summer. With the number of Covid-19 cases rapidly increasing in September and October and with no vaccine available yet, governments in Europe began to impose stricter regulations to slow the spread of the virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Surfing the Waves: Scottish Admirals in Russia in Their Baltic Context
    Suring the Waves: Scottish Admirals in Russia in their Baltic Context Steve Murdoch It has long been established, and frequently reafirmed, that the origins of the Russian navy and her distinctive Saltire insignia can be traced back to the inal years of General Patrick Gordon in his guise as Rear Admiral of the Russian navy.1 There is no doubt that after Gordon’s participation in Russia’s irst tentative naval manoeuvres off of Archangel in 1694, and the irst real amphibious operation against Azov in 1696 (in which Gordon had reverted to a land role), the Romanov dynasty attracted a notable presence of Scottish naval oficers to their cause.2 This reached something of a crescendo during the reign of Catherine the Great. Indeed, we ind that among the oficer class in the Russian navy during the eighteenth century there were admirals of all classes, as well as ships’ captains, lieutenants and numerous other oficers and men.3 Impressive as the sheer numbers of Scottish admirals in Russian service is, there is seldom an opportunity to see them in the context of wider maritime migration. And this is crucial, for without such an overview, we could ind ourselves constructing one of those uncritical histories which might over-celebrate the importance of these men and the relevance of their migration to Russia. That is not to say that they are not to be celebrated, or indeed that they were not important. It simply reiterates the obvious historical point which requires us to take a step back and view our subject matter in a different way.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship of Shame Gender and Nation in Narratives of the 1981 Soviet Submarine Crisis in Sweden
    Ship of Shame Gender and Nation in Narratives of the 1981 Soviet Submarine Crisis in Sweden ✣ Cecilia Ase˚ On the evening of 27 October 1981, a Soviet submarine, U-137, ran aground and was stranded on a rock in a restricted military area near a naval base in Karlskrona, in the southeastern part of Sweden. The boat was discovered the next morning by a local fisherman, who alerted the authorities. Until 6 November, when the submarine was restored to a Soviet fleet waiting beyond the limits of Sweden’s territorial waters, it remained an object of marked military attention and intense diplomatic negotiations. Media coverage of the incident was extensive and made headline news in Sweden and around the world. From Sweden’s perspective, the submarine was a security threat and a flagrant breach of the country’s territorial sovereignty. After the delayed dis- covery of the boat, the Swedish military acted resolutely. Heavily armed troops filled the islands surrounding the submarine, numerous military vessels took positions nearby, and marine helicopters and air force planes circled the area. However, as the diplomatic negotiations became protracted, the sense of shock and disbelief diminished, and concern over national prestige and reputation became all the more rampant. A sense of danger returned with renewed force on the afternoon of 5 November, when Prime Minister Thorbjorn¨ Falldin¨ announced with restrained emotion at a press conference that the submarine carried nuclear weapons.1 This declaration was sensational news and made the violation of Swedish territory appear all the more serious. In the decade following the U-137 episode, the Swedish military was involved in numerous other submarine searches, evicting what were ostensibly foreign submarines from Swedish waters and dropping sink bombs.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Second International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons International Seapower Symposium Events 9-2016 Twenty-Second International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss Recommended Citation Naval War College, The U.S., "Twenty-Second International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings" (2016). International Seapower Symposium. 7. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss/7 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Seapower Symposium by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REPORT OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS TWENTY-SECOND INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings TWENTY-SECOND INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings 20–23 September 2016 Edited by John B. Hattendorf Ernest J. King Professor Emeritus of Maritime History U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Newport, Rhode Island 2017 Attended by naval and coast guard representatives from 106 nations, the International Seapower Symposium provides live translations of the proceedings for all visitors. Editor’s Note Every attempt has been made by this editor to record a clear and accurate record of the Twenty-Second International Seapower Symposium. Through the use of speak- ing notes, transcripts, seminar notes, and tape recordings of the speakers or, when necessary, simultaneous translations, the opinions and views of the participating maritime leaders are recorded in this printed text.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Rim Economies – a List of Writers
    Baltic Rim Economies – a list of writers The following expert articles have been published in the previous reviews: Review Author(s) Position Title of article 1/2021 Krista Mikkonen Minister of the Environment and Climate State of the Baltic Sea is a Change, priority to the Finnish Ministry of the Environment, government Finland 1/2021 Minna Arve Mayor, Sustainability as the policy City of Turku, framework Finland 1/2021 Brita Bohman Senior Lecturer in Environmental Law, Updating the Baltic Sea Action Department of Law, Stockholm University, Plan Sweden 1/2021 Anna Törnroos Assistant Professor (tenure track), The Decade for oceans and Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo humanity Akademi University, Finland 1/2021 Mati Kahru Ph.D., Researcher, The changing Baltic Sea Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, USA 1/2021 Karoliina A. Koho Dr., Project Officer, Towards a “green” future of the BONUS Secretariat (EEIG), Baltic Sea Helsinki, Finland 1/2021 Maciej Zalewski European Regional Centre For Ecohydrology Green Deal – Ecohydrological PAS, nature-based solutions for UNESCO Chair on Ecohydrology and improvement of Baltic ecological Applied Ecology, status Łódź, Poland 1/2021 Aija Caune Chairperson, Hope, stability and protection Coalition Clean Baltic Mikhail Durkin Executive Secretary, Coalition Clean Baltic Nils Höglund Fisheries Policy Officer, Coalition Clean Baltic 1 1/2021 Hannu Klemola Areal Manager, Vulnerable sea needs voluntary Finnish Association for Nature Conservation work to support common
    [Show full text]
  • Rear Admiral Antonio BASILE Deputy Commander of the Italian Coast Guard CONFITARMA - Confederazione Italiana Degli Armatori - Mr
    Copertina_completa_ Supplemento_Atti RSS.qxp_Layout 1 31/05/20 22:54 Pagina 1 MARINA MILITARE ITALIANA ATTI del XII REGIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Supplemento alla Rivista Marittima Aprile 2020 Venezia 15-18 ottobre 2019 ITALIAN NAVY REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS XII REGIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM - Venice 15-18 october 2019 of the XII REGIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Venice 15-18 october 2019 Supplemento alla Rivista Marittima Aprile 2020 REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS of the XII REGIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Venice 15-18 october 2019 Il Capo di Stato Maggiore della Marina I am writing the foreword of the Proceedings of the 12th Regional Seapower Symposium in a moment when the COVID-19 pandemic is striking indiscriminately peoples across the globe, causing death, suffering and unprecedented recession. Only a few months ago, I had the opportunity and the privilege to meet Chiefs of Navies and representatives of the global maritime system in Venice, discussing with them, in the common interest, the challenges and opportunities of this 21st century, the Blue Century. I believe more than ever that the free, open and constructive debate we had last October represents today not only a concrete analysis of the present time, but also a mutual commitment for future rebirth. Our Navies are indeed expected to play even a more decisive role with a view to the global economic recovery, because everything, I say, everything goes by sea. The pandemic itself, in all its tragic nature, indicates the need to act jointly, under any flag. During these days, I have repeatedly thought over what I said in my closing remarks, “We must face challenges together, because this is our only chance to overcome them.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 John Ericsson and the Transformation of the Swedish Naval
    John Ericsson and the transformation of the Swedish naval doctrine Jan Glete Originally a lecture for "Symposium on John Ericsson and the Revolution in naval warfare 1850-1880, Swedish National Defence College Stockholm, 14 Nov 2003. Re-written as an article, "John Ericsson and the transformation of the Swedish naval doctrine", International Journal of Naval History, 2, no. 3, December 2003 (web-publication) During the nineteenth century the Swedish navy faced both the challenge of a fundamentally new strategic situation and that of the technological revolution in naval warfare. The end result was in fact a rather happy one as new technology offered interesting opportunities for a minor navy, which had to concentrate on defence against seaborne invasion. The transformation process was however long and difficult as the formulation of a new doctrine was hampered both by strong traditions and a profound uncertainty about the potential and direction of technological development.1 This article discusses the role of the Swedish-American inventor and consulting engineer John Ericsson (1803-1889) in the transformation of the strategic and tactical doctrines of the Swedish navy. He was an important person in that process. Ericsson did not offer any lasting solution to the problems that the navy faced but, during a period when Swedish naval policy- makers were at a loss about what to do with the technological revolution, he offered solutions which proved essential as stopgap measures. Furthermore, Ericsson prestige and popularity in Sweden also
    [Show full text]