DOCSLIB.ORG

NAEP 1999 TRENDS in ACADEMIC PROGRESS Three Decades of Student Performance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NAEP 1999 TRENDS in ACADEMIC PROGRESS Three Decades of Student Performance NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS NAEP 1999 TRENDS IN ACADEMIC PROGRESS Three Decades of Student Performance SCIENCE, 1969–1999 READING, 1971–1999 MATHEMATICS, 1973–1999 U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES 2000-469 What is The Nation’s Report Card? THE NATION’S REPORT CARD, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America’s students know and can do in various subject areas. Since 1969, assessments have been conducted periodically in reading, mathematics, science, writing, history, geography, and other fields. By making objective information on student performance available to policymakers at the national, state, and local levels, NAEP is an integral part of our nation’s evaluation of the condition and progress of education. Only information related to academic achievement is collected under this program. NAEP guarantees the privacy of individual students and their families. NAEP is a congressionally mandated project of the National Center for Education Statistics, the U.S. Department of Education. The Commissioner of Education Statistics is responsible, by law, for carrying out the NAEP project through competitive awards to qualified organizations. NAEP reports directly to the Commissioner, who is also responsible for providing continuing reviews, including validation studies and solicitation of public comment, on NAEP’s conduct and usefulness. In 1988, Congress established the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) to formulate policy guidelines for NAEP. The Board is responsible for selecting the subject areas to be assessed from among those included in the National Education Goals; for setting appropriate student performance levels; for developing assessment objectives and test specifications through a national consensus approach; for designing the assessment methodology; for developing guidelines for reporting and disseminating NAEP results; for developing standards and procedures for interstate, regional, and national comparisons; for determining the appropriateness of test items and ensuring they are free from bias; and for taking actions to improve the form and use of the National Assessment. The National Assessment Governing Board Mark D. Musick, Chair Edward H. Haertel Migdania D. Vega President Professor, School of Education Principal Southern Regional Education Board Stanford University Coral Way Elementary Bilingual School Atlanta, Georgia Stanford, California Miami, Florida Michael T. Nettles, Vice Chair Juanita Haugen Deborah Voltz Professor of Education & Public Policy Local School Board President Assistant Professor University of Michigan Pleasanton, California Department of Special Education Ann Arbor, Michigan University of Louisville Honorable Nancy Kopp Louisville, Kentucky Moses Barnes Maryland House of Delegates Principal Bethesda, Maryland Honorable Michael E. Ward Hallandale High School State Superintendent of Public Instruction Fort Lauderdale, Florida Mitsugi Nakashima North Carolina Public Schools President Raleigh, North Carolina Melanie A. Campbell Hawaii State Board of Education Fourth-Grade Teacher Honolulu, Hawaii Marilyn A. Whirry Topeka, Kansas Twelfth-Grade English Teacher Debra Paulson Manhattan Beach, California Honorable Wilmer S. Cody Eighth-Grade Mathematics Teacher Former Commissioner of Education El Paso, Texas Dennie Palmer Wolf State of Kentucky Senior Research Associate Frankfort, Kentucky Honorable Jo Ann Pottorff Harvard Graduate School of Education Kansas House of Representatives Cambridge, Massachusetts Daniel A. Domenech Wichita, Kansas Superintendent of Schools C. Kent McGuire (Ex-Officio) Fairfax County Public Schools Diane Ravitch Assistant Secretary of Education Fairfax, Virginia Senior Research Scholar Office of Educational Research New York University and Improvement Edward Donley New York, New York Former Chairman U.S. Department of Education Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Honorable Roy Romer Washington, DC Allentown, Pennsylvania Former Governor of Colorado Superintendent of Schools Honorable John M. Engler Los Angeles, CA Governor of Michigan Roy Truby Executive Director, NAGB Lansing, Michigan John H. Stevens Washington, DC Thomas H. Fisher Executive Director Director, Student Assessment Services Texas Business and Education Coalition Florida Department of Education Austin, Texas Tallahassee, Florida Adam Urbanski Michael J. Guerra President Executive Director Rochester Teachers Association Secondary Schools Department Rochester, New York National Catholic Education Association Washington, DC NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS NAEP 1999 TRENDS IN ACADEMIC PROGRESS Three Decades of Student Performance Jay R. Campbell Catherine M. Hombo John Mazzeo In collaboration with Steve Isham Jo-lin Liang Norma Norris Inge Novatkoski Tatyana Petrovicheva Spence Swinton Lois Worthington August 2000 U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES 2000–469 U.S. Department of Education Richard W. Riley Secretary Office of Educational Research and Improvement C. Kent McGuire Assistant Secretary National Center for Education Statistics Gary W. Phillips Acting Commissioner Assessment Division Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner August 2000 SUGGESTED CITATION U.S. Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. National Center for Education Statistics. NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance, NCES 2000–469, by J.R. Campbell, C.M. Hombo, and J. Mazzeo. Washington, DC: 2000. FOR MORE INFORMATION Content contact: Patricia Dabbs 202–502–7332 To obtain single copies of this report, while supplies last, or ordering information on other U.S. Department of Education products, call toll free 1–877– 4ED PUBS (877–433–7827), or write: Education Publications Center (ED Pubs) U.S. Department of Education P.O. Box 1398 Jessup, MD 20794–1398 TTY/TDD 1–877–576–7734 FAX 301–470–1244 Online ordering via the Internet: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/edpubs.html Copies also are available in alternate formats upon request. This report also is available on the World Wide Web: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard Due to the confidential nature of NAEP surveys, the photographs throughout this report do not portray actual students who participated in the NAEP long-term trend assessment. The photographs are from Comstock, EyeWire Images, The Stock Market, and PhotoDisc stock libraries. The work upon which this publication is based was performed for the National Center for Education Statistics by Educational Testing Service, Westat, and National Computer Systems. TABLE OF CONTENTSC ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 NAEP’s Long-Term Trend Assessments 3 The Student Sample 3 Analysis of Student Performance 4 This Report 7 CHAPTER 1. NATIONAL TRENDS IN ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT 8 National Trends in Reading, Mathematics, and Science 10 National Trends by Quartiles 16 National Trends in Attainment of Performance Levels 26 Summary 31 CHAPTER 2. TRENDS IN ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AMONG STUDENT SUBGROUPS 31 Trends in Academic Achievement Among Racial/Ethnic Subgroups 38 Trends in Score Differences Between Racial/Ethnic Subgroups 41 Trends in Academic Achievement for Male and Female Students 44 Trends in Score Differences Between Male and Female Students 46 Trends in Academic Achievement by Parents’ Level of Education 52 Trends in Academic Achievement for Public and Nonpublic School Students 56 Summary 61 CHAPTER 3. TRENDS IN STUDENTS’ SCHOOL AND HOME EXPERIENCES 62 Mathematics Course-Taking 65 Science Course-Taking 68 Technology and Scientific Equipment in the Classroom 71 Homework 75 Home Experiences Related to Learning 79 Summary 83 APPENDIX A: OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURES USED IN THE 1999 NAEP TREND ASSESSMENTS 99 APPENDIX B: DATA APPENDIX 137 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS NAEP 1999 TRENDS IN ACADEMIC PROGRESS • TABLE OF CONTENTS iii FIGURES 9 Figure 1.1: Trends in Average Scale Scores for the Nation in Reading, Mathematics, and Science 11 Figure 1.2: Trends in Average Reading Scale Scores by Quartile 13 Figure 1.3: Trends in Average Mathematics Scale Scores by Quartile 15 Figure 1.4: Trends in Average Science Scale Scores by Quartile 21 Figure 1.5: Trends in Percentages of Students At or Above Reading Performance Levels 23 Figure 1.6: Trends in Percentages of Students At or Above Mathematics Performance Levels 25 Figure 1.7: Trends in Percentages of Students At or Above Science Performance Levels 26 Figure 1.8: Summary of Trends in National Average Scores 27 Figure 1.9: Summary of Trends in Average Scores by Quartile 28 Figure 1.10: Summary of Trends in Performance Level Results 33 Figure 2.1: Trends in Average Reading Scale Scores by Race/Ethnicity 35 Figure 2.2: Trends in Average Mathematics Scale Scores by Race/Ethnicity 37 Figure 2.3: Trends in Average Science Scale Scores by Race/Ethnicity 39 Figure 2.4: Trends in Differences Between White and Black Students’ Average Scores Across Years (White Minus Black) 40 Figure 2.5: Trends in Differences Between White and Hispanic Students’ Average Scores Across Years (White Minus Hispanic) 41 Figure 2.6: Trends in Average Reading Scale Scores by Gender 42 Figure 2.7: Trends in Average Mathematics Scale Scores by Gender 43 Figure 2.8: Trends in Average Science Scale Scores by Gender 45 Figure 2.9: Trends in Differences Between Male and Female Students’ Average Scale Scores Across Years (Male Minus Female) 46 Figure 2.10: Trends in Average Reading Scale Scores by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Science Fiction Review 29 Geis 1979-01
    JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1979 NUMBER 29 SCIENCE FICTION REVIEW $1.50 NOISE LEVEL By John Brunner Interviews: JOHN BRUNNER MICHAEL MOORCOCK HANK STINE Orson Scott Card - Charles Platt - Darrell Schweitzer Elton Elliott - Bill Warren SCIENCE FICTION REVIEW Formerly THE ALIEN CRITIC RO. Bex 11408 COVER BY STEPHEN FABIAN January, 1979 — Vol .8, No.l Based on a forthcoming novel, SIVA, Portland, OR WHOLE NUMBER 29 by Leigh Richmond 97211 ALIEN TOUTS......................................3 RICHARD E. GEIS, editor & piblisher SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION INTERVIEW WITH JOHN BRUWER............. 8 PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY CONDUCTED BY IAN COVELL PAGE 63 JAN., MARCH, MAY, JULY, SEPT., NOV. NOISE LEVEL......................................... 15 SINGLE COPY ---- $1.50 A COLUMN BY JOHN BRUNNER REVIEWS-------------------------------------------- INTERVIEW WITH MICHAEL MOORCOCK.. .18 PHOfC: (503) 282-0381 CONDUCTED BY IAN COVELL "seasoning" asimov's (sept-oct)...27 "swanilda 's song" analog (oct)....27 THE REVIEW OF SHORT FICTION........... 27 "LITTLE GOETHE F&SF (NOV)........28 BY ORSON SCOTT CARD MARCHERS OF VALHALLA..............................97 "the wind from a burning WOMAN ...28 SKULL-FACE....................................................97 "hunter's moon" analog (nov).....28 SON OF THE WHITE WOLF........................... 97 OCCASIONALLY TENTIONING "TUNNELS OF THE MINDS GALILEO 10.28 SWORDS OF SHAHRAZAR................................97 SCIENCE FICTION................................ 31 "the incredible living man BY DARRELL SCHWEITZER BLACK CANAAN........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Station” IMAX Film
    “Space Station” IMAX Film Theme: Learning to Work, and Live, in Space The educational value of NASM Theater programming is that the stunning visual images displayed engage the interest and desire to learn in students of all ages. The programs do not substitute for an in-depth learning experience, but they do facilitate learning and provide a framework for additional study elaborations, both as part of the Museum visit and afterward. See the “Alignment with Standards” table for details regarding how “Space Station!” and its associated classroom extensions, meet specific national standards of learning. What you will see in the “Space Station” program: • How astronauts train • What it is like to live and work in Space aboard the International Space Station (ISS) Things to look for when watching “Space Station”: • Notice how quickly astronauts adapt to free fall conditions and life on the ISS • Reasons humans go to the cost, risk, and effort to work in Space • The importance of “the little things” in keeping astronauts productive so far from home Learning Elaboration While Visiting the National Air and Space Museum Perhaps the first stop to expand on your “Space Station” experience should be the Skylab Orbiting Laboratory, entered from the second floor overlooking the Space Race Gallery. Skylab was America’s first space station, launched in 1973 and visited by three different three-man crews. It fell back to Earth in 1979. The Skylab on display was the back-up for the Skylab that was launched; the Skylab program was cancelled before it was
    [Show full text]
  • Skylab: the Human Side of a Scientific Mission
    SKYLAB: THE HUMAN SIDE OF A SCIENTIFIC MISSION Michael P. Johnson, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: J. Todd Moye, Major Professor Alfred F. Hurley, Committee Member Adrian Lewis, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of History Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Johnson, Michael P. Skylab: The Human Side of a Scientific Mission. Master of Arts (History), May 2007, 115pp., 3 tables, references, 104 titles. This work attempts to focus on the human side of Skylab, America’s first space station, from 1973 to 1974. The thesis begins by showing some context for Skylab, especially in light of the Cold War and the “space race” between the United States and the Soviet Union. The development of the station, as well as the astronaut selection process, are traced from the beginnings of NASA. The focus then shifts to changes in NASA from the Apollo missions to Skylab, as well as training, before highlighting the three missions to the station. The work then attempts to show the significance of Skylab by focusing on the myriad of lessons that can be learned from it and applied to future programs. Copyright 2007 by Michael P. Johnson ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not be possible without the help of numerous people. I would like to begin, as always, by thanking my parents. You are a continuous source of help and guidance, and you have never doubted me. Of course I have to thank my brothers and sisters.
    [Show full text]
  • MC 2013 Vita
    MICHAEL COLE (2013) Department of Communication, 0506 University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093 (858) 534-4590 (office) (858) 534-7746 (fax) [email protected] Titles: University Professor of Communication and Psychology, Emeritus Date of birth: April 13, 1938 Place of Birth: Los Angeles, California EDUCATION: School, college, Dates of Location Major subject Degrees or Date university, or attendance or field certificates received hospital (internship, residency, or fellowship) Indiana University 09/59-08/62 Indiana Psychology Ph.D. 08/62 UCLA 09/57-06/59 Los Angeles, CA Psychology B.A. 06/59 UC Berkeley 01/57-06/57 Berkeley, CA Psychology Oberlin College 06/55-01/57 Ohio Psychology Fairfax High School 09/52-06/55 Los Angeles, CA Diploma 06/55 RESEARCH AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1999 University Professor, Departments of Communication, Psychology and the Human Development Program, University of California, San Diego 1995- Director, Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, University of California San Diego. 1990-1991 Fellow, Center for Advanced Study Fellow in the Behavioral Sciences 1986-1987 Guest Scientist, MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London, England 1978-1999 Professor, University of California, San Diego 1978-1989 Director, Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, University of California San Diego. 1978-1981 Coordinator, Communication Program University California, San Diego 1975-1978 The Rockefeller University Professor 1969-1975 The Rockefeller University Associate Professor 1966-1969 University of California
    [Show full text]
  • NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance
    .DOCUMENT RESUME ED 441 875 TM 031 935 AUTHOR Campbell, Jay R.; Hombo, Catherine M.; Mazzeo, John TITLE NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance. INSTITUTION National Center for Education Statistics (ED), Washington, DC REPORT NO NCES-2000-469 ISBN ISBN-0-16-050558-5 PUB DATE 2000-08-00 NOTE 180p.; "In collaboration with Steve Isham, Jo-Lin Liang, Norma Norris, Inge Novatkoski, Tatyana Petrovicheva, Spence Swinton, and Lois Worthington." AVAILABLE FROM ED Pubs, P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Tel: 877-433-7827 (Toll Free). U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328. PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Educational Trends; Elementary Secondary Education; *Mathematics Achievement; Mathematics Tests; *National Competency Tests; *Reading Achievement; Reading Tests; *Science Achievement; Science Tests; Trend Analysis IDENTIFIERS *National Assessment of Educational Progress. ABSTRACT The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has served as the only ongoing monitor of student achievement in the United States across time. This report summarizes major findings from 10 administrations of the long-term reading assessment since 1971, 9 administrations of the long-term trend mathematics assessment since 1973, and 10 administrations of the long-term trend science assessment since 1969 and 1970. Generally, the trends in mathematics and science are characterized by declines in the 1970s followed by increases during the 1980s and early 1990s and mostly stable performance since then. Some gains are evidenced in reading, but they are modest. Overall improvement across the assessment years is most evidenced in mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Leo ESAKI Citation
    DOCTOR OF SCIENCE honoris causa Professor Leo ESAKI Citation Great breakthroughs in science come from then was Professor Leroy CHANG,now University dedicated and creative individuals who challenge the Professor Emeritus of HKUST. This work triggered a unknown, and make the impossible possible. To honor wide spectrum of experimental and theoretical Professor Leo ESAKIfor outstanding achievements in investigations, resulting in not only the observation of physics covering more than half a century, is to a number of intriguing phenomena, but also acknowledge a man for whom creative work is essential the emergence of a new class of transport and to life itself. optoelectronic devices. Professor Esaki was born in Osaka in 1925, and It was while he was at IBM that Professor Esaki was received his Bachelor’s degree and PhD from the awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973, in University of Tokyo, both in science. He began his career recognition of his breakthrough discovery of tunneling with a large company, spending nine years there, but in semiconductors, a quantum-mechanical effect in left to join a small, unknown organization that would which an electron passes through a potential barrier, later become a household name as the Sony even though classical theory predicted that it could not. Corporation. While acknowledging the risk of such a What he achieved was, by his own high standards,“a career move, he found the ambitious company far more simple and inexpensive experiment, but important. It interesting and challenging than a stable environment. was probably the least expensive Nobel Prize-winning experiment ever conducted.” Success at Sony culminated in his discovery of the first quantum electronic device, and it carries his name: Professor Esaki’s dedication to science is matched the Esaki Tunnel Diode.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development
    The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development <UN> Elisabeth Mann Borgese, 1918–2002 First Lady of the Oceans remembering Elisabeth Mann Borgese Committed as she was to all the right things, she gave dazzling speeches with a brilliant turn of a phrase, but I remember her best standing on her head and smiling upside down. It was the oceans she loved, those salty seas where life began and over time emerged onto land. She believed a new set of laws would do as life had done: emerge from the seas onto land. She gave her own life to this grand possibility. She lived at the water’s edge and took her dogs for long walks on the sandy shores. In her quiet moments she taught her dogs, proper English setters, to play piano, to type and even to write Columbian school poetry. I learned from her the art of vision, of looking into the depths and finding a future worth fighting for. She was only fifty when I saw her standing on her head, well past youth and on her way to venerability. She grew older with grace, never slowing her tempo or showing the accumulating years. They called her the queen of the seas, the first lady of the oceans. It was the mountains that took her away, the snow covered mountains. david krieger, February 2011 <UN> The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development Essays in Honor of Elisabeth Mann Borgese (1918–2002) Edited by the International Ocean Institute - Canada Dirk Werle – Paul R. Boudreau – Mary R.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Wennberg Has Battled Uncertainty in Medicine—And Foes of His Findings— for 35 Years
    Jack Wennberg has battled uncertainty in medicine—and foes of his findings— for 35 years. His weapons have been intellectual bravery and a dogged sense of doing the right thing. Now hailed nationwide for his iconoclastic ideas, he has just stepped down from leading the troops he assembled at Dartmouth. By Maggie Mahar or half a century,” Dr. John Wennberg declared in a 1977 issue of Pediatrics, “the tonsil has been the target of a large-scale, un- ‘Fcontrolled surgical experiment—tonsillectomy.” Jack Wenn- berg had just taken the pin out of a grenade—and he knew it. With the phrase “uncontrolled surgical experiment,” he acknowledged what few doctors at that time would admit: they operated on people with- out knowing, with certainty, whether the procedure would do the pa- tients any good. And in this case the patients were children. During the 1930s and 1940s, half of the nation’s children had their tonsils removed, but “since World War II,” Wennberg reported in that article, “opinion has swung away from mass use” (emphasis added). By 1973, he added, only 25% of the nation’s children were undergoing the procedure. (Nevertheless, though its popularity had ebbed, ton- sillectomy remained the second most common procedure in the Unit- ed States, after circumcision.) The word “opinion” in that passage is jarring. What could Wenn- Recently named the most influential health- berg mean? After all, by 1977 medicine was firmly established as a sci- ence. Wasn’t it? Surely doctors would not subject millions of children policy researcher of the past 25 years, Jack to a painful and potentially risky operation unless they had solid evi- Wennberg took a lot of barbs early on for his dence that the surgery was truly needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Process of Technological Innovation Matthew Mckinlay
    Combination and context: Exploring the process of technological innovation Matthew McKinlay Entrepreneurship Commercialisation and Innovation Centre of the University of Adelaide Submitted: 21st September 2017 Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 17 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 17 1.1 Practical problem focus ...................................................................................... 18 1.2 Theoretical focus ................................................................................................ 21 1.3 The research questions ...................................................................................... 24 1.4 Scope of the research ......................................................................................... 24 1.4.1 Research design ..................................................................................... 25 1.5 Methodology ....................................................................................................... 26 1.6 Research outcomes ............................................................................................ 30 1.7 Summary of contributions ................................................................................... 34 1.8 Thesis overview .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4 to Skylab's Life Science Experiments
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 181 001 SP 015 415 AUTHOR . 'Van 'Huss, Wayne D.: Heusner, Williaa W. TITLE. Space Fli.ght Research Relevant to Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, With Particular Reference.. to Skylab's Life Science Experiments. INSTITUTION American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, -j Recreation' and DanceJAAHPERD)-.: National Aeronautics ....2! j, and Space Aclpinistrat ion.. Wash;pcitu4 D.C..,- _,,,,,A4...., , , , PUB DATE ' Jun 79 . ' 1 NOTE, 5y. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing . Office, Washington,'D.C. 20402 (St-cick-No. , 033-000-00778-7, $2.501 , A, 1 . EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus hostage. PC Not Available fromAgES. DESCRIPTORS Aerospace technolo y: Heart Rate; *Human Body; Human Posture:. Mtscula Strength: Physical ActivItyleyel; *Physical Envir tment: *Physical Fitness; *Scientific . Research:. *S..pace Sciences . IDEUTIFIERS Astronauts: *Skylab: *Space Biology: . Weightlessness ' ABSTRACT &An ovefview of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAST) studies dealing with the effect of extended space flight on the human.body is presented. The results of' ex,periments'investigatipg"Weight loss, pgsture change, sleep habits, limb size, and motor skins are oome of the topics discdssed. Bibliographies, source lists, charts, and tables are given to supplement the text.A glcssary'of terms is included. (LH) A Il , iv" 4 I. 7,4 e . , 0 , , . , . ./, ********A*************************'****************,*****************,***, * - Reproductions supplied by 7DRS are the best411pt.can'ibe made * r'" * * . , from the'original'document. **************,14***************************************************,***. , 4. 'I - . , vr..iestomm* Space ROM Rearch Relevant to Hegel Physical Educati 4 and Recreation 4A+1Aretvivp., PWith Particular Refer to Skylab's Life Scien,,, Experiments DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, 445 jEDUCATION a WELPARE ITIATIONAL INSTITUTE OF Wayne D.
    [Show full text]
  • Jsc-Skylab-News-Briefings.Pdf (111.3Kb)
    NEWS BRIEFINGS AND RELATED PUBLICATIONS Rev Date: Boxes 875-881 SKYLAB SERIES NEWS BRIEFINGS AND RELATED PUBLICATIONS Included in this subseries are five boxes of news briefings by the Skylab News Center (JSC) during Skylab Missions 2, 3 and 4. The briefings date from 6/11/73 to 2/8/74; each briefing begins with a heading indicating the subject discussed, the date, place, and location, and the names of the participants and their job titles within NASA. A transcription of the briefing itself follows this information. The briefings are filed in chronological order. The last two boxes of this subseries consist of several NASA publications, all dealing with some aspect of the Skylab Program, and released to provide the press or the general public with technical information on the program. They include extensive descriptions of Skylab operations and are often heavily illustrated. One of the publications, the seven-volume "Skylab Experiments" series, was specifically designed to be used by teachers in the classroom. The publications are filed in chronological order. Inventory SubHeading: Box Number: 875 Skylab Briefing February 3, 1971 Press Conferences Jan - Oct 1972 News Briefings May 11 - 26, 1973 "What's Skylab All About?" A Special Broadcast for Young People May 12, 1973 (Preliminary Draft) SubHeading: Box Number: 876 News Briefings June-Aug 1973 SubHeading: Box Number: 877 News Briefings Aug 16 - Nov 15, 1973 SubHeading: Box Number: 878 News Briefings Nov 16 - Dec 19, 1973 SubHeading: Box Number: 879 News Briefings Dec 20, 73 - Feb 8,
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the United States Space Program the 1973 Harvey Cushing
    The future of the United States space program The 1973 Harvey Cushing oration WERNHER YON BRAUN, PH.D. Vice President, Engineering and Development, Fairchild Industries, Germantown, Maryland The distinguished author delivered his address without a prepared text. He has, at our invitation, recreated this review o[ certain highlights in his experience with the Apollo program, plus a glimpse into the future of space exploration. He emphasizes medical uses of the Skylab space station, a continuous survey o/ earth resources /rom satellites, and the establishment of direct broadcast television satellites as an aid to education in developing countries. --The Editor 'ASA has often been asked what the on a cruise through the Greek Islands. real reason was for the amazing During this cruise we also visited the famous N string of successes with our Apollo site of the Delphi Oracle to which since flights to the moon. I think the only honest antiquity generals and statesmen would answer I can give is that we tried to never make their pilgrimage to find out what the overlook anything. Let me give you an future held in store for them. The beautiful illustration of what I mean by that. park of Delphi is also the home of a famous A few weeks before the launch of Apollo Apollo temple. When we left the park, a 11 which carried Neil Armstrong's team to Greek newspaperman who must have been the lunar surface, I found myself in a trailing us buttonholed me and asked: "Dr. position comparable to that of a ship von Braun, what in the world are you doing captain whose boat is in drydock.
    [Show full text]