DOCSLIB.ORG

Kwethluk Subsistence Salmon Harvest Levels During 1986

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kwethluk Subsistence Salmon Harvest Levels During 1986 KWETHLU& SUBSISTENCE: CONTEMPORARY LAND USE PAlTERNS, WILD RESOURCE HARVEST AND USE, AND THE SUBSISTENCE ECONOMY OF A LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA COMMUNITY Michael W. Coffimg Technical Paper No. 157 Alaska Department of Fiih and Game Division of Subsistence Juneau, Alaska December 1991 7his research was partially supported by ANZLCA Federal Aid fin& administered through the. U.S. Fish and wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, SG-l-4 and SG-l-5 EEO STATEMENT l7ze Alaska Department of Fish and Game operates all of its public programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, age, sex, or handicap. Because the depatiment receives federal funding any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against should w&e to: O.E.O. U. S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 ABSTRACT Kwethluk is a community located near the Kuskokwim River in western Alaska, 20 river miles upstream from Bethel. In 1986, the community contained 540 residents, primarily Yup’ik Eskimo, living in 112 households. This study was conducted to examine subsistence wildlife harvest and use, including areas used when hunting, trapping, and gathering, seasonality of harvest, methods and means of harvest, processing and preservation methods, distribution, and harvest levels. Data on demographics, employment, and income were also collected. During the study period (1986-87), employment in the community was highly dependent on state and federal funding. Seventy-seven percent of the available jobs’were government funded. Twenty-five percent of the households were not involved in wage employment. The majority of households that were involved in wage employment derived income from a single job. Fifty percent of the wage-earning jobs lasted for nine months or less and 44 percent of the jobs were part time. Average household income earned from wage employment was only $9,747. Wage employment income accounted for 45 percent of the total community income. The median household income during 1986 was relatively low at $16,624. Fii-two percent of the households earned income from commercial salmon fishing in the Kuskokwim Area commercial fishery. Average household income earned from commercial salmon fishing was $6,814. Overall commercial fishing contributed 16 percent of the community income. During 1986 there were 68 “limited entry” commercial salmon fishing permits in the community. Kwethluk residents were not involved in other commercial fisheries. Kwethluk’s life and economy relied heavily on the traditional harvest and use of wild resources. All households participated in harvesting wildlife for subsistence use. Household harvests of wildlife averaged 3,860 pounds edible weight. The per capita harvest was 800 pounds edible weight, among the highest of communities in Alaska. Household harvests ranged from 19 to 23,758 pounds edible weight. Seventy percent of the households were involved in harvesting or processing salmon for subsistence use in 52 subsistence salmon production units. Salmon production units were composed of extended families in multiple households. During 1986 there were 52 salmon fishing camps being used for processing and preserving salmon for subsistence use. Some salmon f&ring camps had been used for more than 50 years by their current owners. Several salmon fshing camps had been relocated due to erosion along the Kuskokwim River or Kuskokuak Slough. Salmon comprised 53 percent of the total community harvest of wildlife. Salmon harvests during 1986 totaled 229,063 pounds edible weight. Harvests of salmon for subsistence use averaged 884 pounds of chinook, 591 pounds of chum, 349 pounds sockeye, and 203 pounds of coho salmon per household. Harvests levels during 1986 were about average. Freshwater Fib contributed 32 percent of the total pounds edible weight of wildlife harvested. Northern pike, whitefish, and burbot were the primary freshwater fish harvested. Moose accounted for 90 percent of the big game harvested and brown bear constituted the next highest quantity of big game harvested. During certain years, caribou was an important subsistence resource. Extended family members in multiple households often comprised hunting, fishing, and gathering groups. Sharing of wildlife harvested for subsistence with households in the community and with households in other communities was common. Kwethluk used a substantial area for obtaining wild foods, including inland mountains, rivers, and coastal marine waters. Areas used for hunting, fishing, and gathering extend from Kuskokwim Bay to McGrath, and from Baird Inlet to the Nushagak River. Contemporary patterns of land use were closely linked to historical use patterns and traditional use areas. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT LIST OF FIGURES .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ................ ix LIST OF TABLES .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .................. xi . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY.. ................................................................ METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... General Design .................................................................................................................. Sample Design ................................................................................................................... Salmon Harvest and Use S.urvey ...................................................................... Non-Salmon Fisheries and Wildlife Resources Harvest and Use Survey ....................................................................................7 Land Use Mapping .............................................................................................8 Data Analysis .....................................................................................................................13 Limitations ..........................................................................................................................13 RATIONALE AND LITERATURE REVIEW .........................................................................14 CHAPTER 2. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA .......................................................................17 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING.. ..........................................................................................................17 CLIMATE .........................................................................................” .............................................. 18 FLORA AND FAUNA ...................................................................................................................21 REGIONAL SETTING ..................................................................................................................23 CHAPTER 3. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................27 SEASONAL ROUND OF SUBSISTENCE ACTIVITIES: 1900 TO 1930s........................... 30 SETTLEMENT OF KWETHLUK ...............................................................................................33 -CHAPTER 4. CONTEMPORARY COMMUNITY PROFILE.. ......................................................37 COMMUNITY SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS .................................................37 Public and Private Sectors................................................................................................ 37 Housing ...............................................................................................................................38 Transportation ...................................................................................................................39 Population Characteristics ................................................................................................39 Job Opportunities and Wage Employment.. ................................................................;. 42 Commercial Fishing Income ............................................................................................47 Other Income Sources...................................................................................................... 54 Cost of Living.. ...................................................................................................................56 CHAPTER 5. CONTEMPORARY RESOURCE USE ......................................................................61 SEASONAL ROUND OF SUBSISTENCE ACTIVITIES.. .....................................................61 HOUSEHOLD PARTICIPATION IN RESOURCE HARVEST ACTIVITIES.. ............... 69 RESOURCE USE AREAS.. ..........................................................................................................69 HARVEST QUANTITIES.. ...........................................................................................................77 RESOURCE SHARING ................................................................................................................82 V CHAPTER 6. FISH AND WILDLIFE HARVEST AND USE PA’ITERNS .................................. 87 SALMON FISHING ........................................................................................................................88 Subsistence Salmon Fishing Regulations .......................................................................89
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kisaralik River
    KISARALIK RIVER A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER ANALYSIS by the · . neritage Conservation & Recreation Service October 1979 Anchor an '. - .. ·.. :~ .• . ~~ ., ·. ARLIS .· .· Alaska Resources Uotary & Information Services AlM INTRODUCTION At the request of the Bureau of Land Management, the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service made an independent study of the resources of the Kisaralik River area to determine the river's suitability for designation as a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System. In the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (PL. 90-542) Congress stated: "It is hereby declareq to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which with their immediate envi:r:onments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations." Ibis study was made in compliance with ~he Act. An interagency field inspection was conducted of the Kisaralik River in July 1978. Participating in the inspection were: Bureau of Land Management U.s. Fish & Wildlife Service State of AI;aska, Division Heritage Conseravtion & of Parks Recreation Service The following analysis is largel~ based on information obtained during the interagency field inspection; the Kisaralik River Report of August 7-14, 1976, by BLM staff (unpublished); the BOR aerial reconaissance in 1977; and library materials. THE RIVER AND ITS SETTING ~eral Setting The 3,000-4,000 foot high Kuskokwim Mountains run from near the central Yukon River in a southwest direction to the Bering Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe: How to Break the Vicious Circle?
    Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe: How to Break the Vicious Circle? edited by Steffen Abele and Klaus Frohberg Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe: How to Break the Vicious Circle? Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe Edited by Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe IAMO Volume 22 Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe: How to Break the Vicious Circle? Edited by Steffen Abele and Klaus Frohberg IAMO 2003 Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists the publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the internet at: http://dnb.ddb.de. © 2003 Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Mittel- und Osteuropa (IAMO) Theodor-Lieser-Straße 2 062120 Halle (Saale) Tel. 49 (345) 2928-0 Fax 49 (345) 2928-199 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.iamo.de ISSN 1436-221X ISBN 3-9809270-2-4 INTRODUCTION STEFFEN ABELE, KLAUS FROHBERG Subsistence agriculture is probably the least understood and the most neglected type of agriculture. In a globalised, market-driven world, it remains at the same time a myth and a marginal phenomenon. Empirically, subsistence agriculture for a long time seemed to be restricted to developing countries, with only a few cases reported in Western Europe (CAILLAVET and NICHELE 1999; THIEDE 1994). Governmental support offered to subsistence agriculture was mainly done through agricultural development policies, the main objective being to have subsistence farmers participate in markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Range
    Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon River Nulato Hills Lime Hills Alaska Range Yukon River Lowlands Seward Peninsula Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Ray Mountains Ahklu
    New Allakaket !! er !! iv !! H R k a e Alatna o z e l t r l a y g C k I o y n C e H r r e g k n e r Allakaket e k t Cre r e v r e Asiksa e i u e e C H K R k r P k a a a s C h h R n n s u i K v Kotzebue Sound Lowlands z i k e u k o r P e h r r t r k i r k k Selawik National u e k e i e e R ek u v u e H k il r i re Cr l C i C a u G v n u C n k R t i o s e la n k h a e ha r i k h r t il i i C e S g t C in u nu C Wildlife Refuge e h w H a r K r k S a e e l reek k e e o C e e ltlinkh h k Ta k r e S g r k W e k u e C h e e v o i n e r r e l e e e r C S R m l e k v o i C Deering k k r e L C e d x ! c u C r R r ! i o e C o D a r m Kada e k f R e ina C l f s re K Kobuk Ridges and Valleys e e K ek k i t o l p k s l o k S g e a lat p c ta ht a e n o i C u D k t k E r oha Creek na a r Al C C Cre a r e C e k C k e r r k k t e r e e ek e e l ek e o e i e r r v r k v C k k i C W ugh P ry i e R ar all g Slo C te e e le ic Lon s R r R k y i C C r k e C re M v e k e k r k k e a k e Map Area Extenitr B e e e r u r r D C K a i r B C h l e C o l v u k k c o y k i o H r m k g e A n e e a c e a u g H r R tla o e e e n C i o r k l n r a k a u R C n m e re n e a o k e y C o C c w b k o e r i a t a n C r k i r u a P e s I k Ca v o a H K M n h C C k e N d n i r oo e l Bb uckland C k u n ek it r l a e uk a re l o C h k ! C r e y C C e ! e L C ek a ree e r z na o E C u k e o r it a re h k C e z ol N s C y k N n s y e h K e i n e p e r n e ig k t i e y lo n k h s C G i ree e H ra o d M C k e o r l p K t d e n N O um e h k k o e z k J e ee k a ee e r Cr n K C B r e
    [Show full text]
  • A General Equilibrium Model for Analyzing African Rural Subsistence Economies and an African Green Revolution
    AFRICA GROWTH INITIATIVE WORKING PAPER 12 | JUNE 2013 A GenerAl equilibrium model for AnAlyzinG AfricAn rurAl subsistence economies And An AfricAn Green revolution John W. McArthur and Jeffrey D. Sachs John W. McArthur is a senior fellow with the U.N. Foundation and the Fung Global Institute, and a nonresident senior fellow in Global Economy and Development at the Brookings Institution. Jeffrey D. Sachs is director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. Abstract: How can foreign aid support economic growth in Africa? This paper presents a geographically indexed general equilibrium model that enables green revolution—focused macroeconomic analysis in low-income African settings. The model is flexible to parameterization and highlights the role of farmers’ constraints to self-financing of inputs alongside minimum subsistence consumption requirements. It includes particular attention to the challenge of soil productivity and to the effects of official development assistance (ODA) for agricultural inputs and road building. Uganda is used as an illustrative case. The economy’s labor force is predominantly still located in rural areas and remains overwhelmingly focused on staple food production. Under plausible economy-wide parameters, a foreign- financed green revolution package shows a clear anti-Dutch disease result, in which the temporary boost in tar- geted ODA yields permanent productivity and welfare effects at relatively low cost. Acknowledgements: The corresponding author is John W. McArthur who can be reached at [email protected]. The authors thank Christopher Adam, Mwangi Kimenyi, Oliver Morrissey, John Page, Francis Teal, participants in the Brookings Africa Growth Initiative seminar, and participants in the Oxford Centre for the Study of African Economies annual conference for helpful comments and discussions during various stages of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour”* (1954)
    W.A.Lewis on Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor 1 Space for Notes W.A. Lewis, ↓ “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour”* (1954) 1. This essay is written in the classical tradition, making the classical assumption, and asking the classical question. The classics, from Smith to Marx, all assumed, or argued, that an unlimited supply of labour was available at subsistence wages. They then enquired how production grows through time. They found the answer in capital accumulation, which they explained in terms of their analysis of the distribution of income. Classical systems stems thus determined simultaneously income distribution and income growth, with the relative prices of commodities as a minor bye-product. Interest in prices and in income distribution survived into the neo-classical era, but labour ceased to be unlimited in supply, and the formal model of economic analysis was no longer expected to explain the expansion of the system through time. These changes of assumption and of interest served well enough in the European parts of the world, where labour was indeed limited in supply, and where for the next half century it looked as if economic expansion could indeed be assumed to be automatic. On the other hand over the greater part of Asia labour is unlimited in supply, and economic expansion certainly cannot be taken for granted. Asia’s problems, however, attracted very few economists during the neo-classical era (even the Asian economists themselves absorbed the assumptions and preoccupations of European economics) and hardly any progress has been made for nearly a century with the kind of economics which would throw light upon the problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subsistence to Commercial Transition in Agricultural Development
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1969 The ubs sistence to commercial transition in agricultural development Elisha Walter Coward Jr. Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Coward, Elisha Walter Jr., "The ubsis stence to commercial transition in agricultural development" (1969). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 3566. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/3566 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-20,632 COWARD, Jr., Elisha Walter, 1937- THE SUBSISTENCE TO COMMERCIAL TRANSITION IN AGRICULTURAL DEVELOP­ MENT. Iowa State University, Ph.D., 1969 Sociology, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE SUBSISTENCE TO COMMERCIAL TRANSITION # A i m /\ ; rMr»#rri/> # M r*\ui\iwwi wi>r\b. L/w w lu j.w i I'tw i by Elisha Walter Coward, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Sociology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Work Signature
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence in Samoa: Influences of the Capitalist Global Economy on Conceptions of Wealth and Well-Being
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2019 Subsistence in Samoa: influences of the capitalist global economy on conceptions of wealth and well-being Tess Hosman SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Growth and Development Commons, Pacific Islands Languages and Societies Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Regional Sociology Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Hosman, Tess, "Subsistence in Samoa: influences of the capitalist global economy on conceptions of wealth and well-being" (2019). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 3045. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/3045 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Subsistence in Samoa: influences of the capitalist global economy on conceptions of wealth and well-being Tess Hosman Advisor Mika Maiava Dr. Fetaomi Tapu-Qiliho S.I.T. Samoa, Spring 2019 Hosman 1 Abstract This paper studies Samoa’s position in the global economy as an informal agricultural economy. A country’s access to the global economy reflects a level of socio-economic development and political power. It is also reflective of the country’s history of globalization. This research uses an analysis of past and current forms of colonization that continue to influence cultural and ideological practices, specifically practices regarding food.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrocarbon Potential of the Lower Kuskokwim River Area, Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Southwest Alaska
    August 14,1995 Price: $3.40 Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys PUBLIC-DATA FILE 95-28 HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA, YUKON-KUSKOKWIM DELTA, SOUTHWEST ALASKA by C.G. Mull, T.K. Bundtzen, and R.R. Reifenstuhl August 1995 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR TECHNICAL CONTENT (EXCEPT AS NOTED IN TEXT) OR FOR CONFORMITY TO THE EDITORIAL STANDARDS OF DGGS. Released by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENTOF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Fairbanks. Alaska 99709-3645 HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA, YUKON-KUSKOKWIM DELTA, SOUTHWEST ALASKA TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION REGIONAL GEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK Regional structure of the lower Kuskokwim River area SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY Napatuk Creek #I well Lithology Petrology Paleontology Thermal maturity Discussion of thermal maturity Drill stem tests Hydrocarbon source rock potential of Napatuk Creek well Discussion GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Reflection seismic surveys Gravity surveys Airborne magnetic surveys 1994 airborne magnetic survey HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OP THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA Reservoir rocks Hydrocarbon source rock potential SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES CITED APPENDIX #1 Petrographic analysis of 19 thinsections LIST OF FIGURES Pig. 1 Index map to the lower Kuskokwim River area showing area of 1994 airborne magnetic survey Fig. 2 Generalized geologic map of the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta area, modified from map by Kirschner, 1988. A-A'---line of cross section Pig. 3 Generalized cross section of Kuskokwim delta area, modified from section by C.M. Molenaar, Shell Oil Company, 1962. Fig. 4 Induction electrical log and gamma ray log of interbedded Cretaceous sandstones and shales at 7,000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Bering Sea – Western Interior Alaska Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
    Bibliography: Bering Sea – Western Interior In support of: Bering Sea – Western Interior Alaska Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Principal Investigator: Juli Braund-Allen Prepared by: Dan Fleming Alaska Resources Library and Information Services 3211 Providence Drive Library, Suite 111 Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Anchorage Field Office 4700 BLM Road Anchorage, AK 99507 September 1, 2008 Bibliography: Bering Sea – Western Interior In Author Format In Support of: Bering Sea – Western Interior Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by: Alaska Resources Library and Information Services September 1, 2008 A.W. Murfitt Company, and Bethel (Alaska). 1984. Summary report : Bethel Drainage management plan, Bethel, Alaska, Project No 84-060.02. Anchorage, Alaska: The Company. A.W. Murfitt Company, Bethel (Alaska), Delta Surveying, and Hydrocon Inc. 1984. Final report : Bethel drainage management plan, Bethel, Alaska, Project No. 83-060.01, Bethel drainage management plan. Anchorage, Alaska: The Company. Aamodt, Paul L., Sue Israel Jacobsen, and Dwight E. Hill. 1979. Uranium hydrogeochemical and stream sediment reconnaissance of the McGrath and Talkeetna NTMS quadrangles, Alaska, including concentrations of forty-three additional elements, GJBX 123(79). Los Alamos, N.M.: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California. Abromaitis, Grace Elizabeth. 2000. A retrospective assessment of primary productivity on the Bering and Chukchi Sea shelves using stable isotope ratios in seabirds. Thesis (M.S.), University of Alaska Fairbanks. Ackerman, Robert E. 1979. Southwestern Alaska Archeological survey 1978 : Akhlun - Eek Mountains region. Pullman, Wash.: Arctic Research Section, Laboratory of Anthropology, Washington State University. ———. 1980. Southwestern Alaska archeological survey, Kagati Lake, Kisarilik-Kwethluk Rivers : a final research report to the National Geographic Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Publication No. BOF 2018-06
    Special Publication No. BOF 2018-06 Overview of the Development and Implementation of the Kuskokwim River Household Subsistence King Salmon Permit System, 2018 by David M. Runfola Christopher R. McDevitt and Caroline L. Brown December 2018 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in Division of Subsistence reports. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figures or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative Code AAC all standard mathematical signs, deciliter dL all commonly-accepted symbols and abbreviations gram g abbreviations e.g., alternate hypothesis HA hectare ha Mr., Mrs., base of natural logarithm e kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilometer km all commonly-accepted coefficient of variation CV liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) meter m R.N., etc. confidence interval CI milliliter mL at @ correlation coefficient (multiple) R millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient (simple) r east E covariance cov Weights and measures (English) north N degree (angular ) ° cubic feet per second ft3/s south S degrees of freedom df foot ft west W expected value E gallon gal copyright greater than > inch in corporate suffixes: greater than or equal to ≥ mile mi Company Co. harvest per unit effort HPUE nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon River Lowlands – Kuskokwim Mountains – Lime Hills Rapid Ecoregional Assessment Technical Supplement
    Yukon River Lowlands – Kuskokwim Mountains – Lime Hills Rapid Ecoregional Assessment Technical Supplement Technical supplement to the final report prepared for: Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of the Interior July 2014 It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Prepared for: National Operations Center Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of the Interior Building 50, Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 To find this report online and to access the data portal go to: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/more/Landscape_Approach/reas.html Alaska Natural Heritage Program University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A St. Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage 4500 Diplomacy Drive, 5th Floor Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Scenarios Network for Alaska Planning University of Alaska Fairbanks 3352 College Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 YUKON RIVER LOWLANDS – KUSKOKWIM MOUNTAINS – LIME HILLS RAPID ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT Suggested Citations: Individual Chapters Chapter Author(s). 2014. Chapter Title. In: Trammell, E. J., M.L. McTeague, and M.L. Carlson (eds.), Yukon River Lowlands – Kuskokwim Mountains – Lime Hills Rapid Ecoregional Assessment Technical Supplement. Prepared for the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado. Collective Document Trammell, E. J., M.L. McTeague, K.W. Boggs, M.L. Carlson, N. Fresco, T. Gotthardt, L. Kenney, and D. Vadapalli. 2014. Yukon River Lowlands – Kuskokwim Mountains – Lime Hills Rapid Ecoregional Assessment Technical Supplement. Prepared for the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado.
    [Show full text]