DOCSLIB.ORG

Flooding Positive/Neutral Positive/Neutral Neutral Yes Yes 15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flooding Positive/Neutral Positive/Neutral Neutral Yes Yes 15 Project Delivery Table: Summarised conclusions of the appraisal and assessment Appraisal and assessment conclusions Objective Within Beyond Urban Rural Outside the Borough the plan the plan period? period? 1. To ensure that the opportunity is provided for decent Strongly positive Neutral Neutral Yes Yes homes to be provided for all the community 2. To improve human health and wellbeing Positive/Strongly Positive Positive/Neutral Yes Yes positive 3. To reduce the gap between the most disadvantaged Positive/Strongly Positive/Neutral Positive/Neutral Yes Yes communities and the rest and to increase prosperity positive 4. To raise education levels and develop opportunities for Positive Positive Unknown Yes Yes everyone to find the skills needed to find, remain, and progress at work 5. To promote social inclusion and cohesion including Strongly positive Positive/Strongly Positive/Neutral Yes Yes creating a safe and secure environment positive 6. To encourage development and participation in Positive/Strongly Positive Neutral Yes Yes culture, sport, and the arts and enjoyment of the positive countryside 7. To sustain and improve vibrant rural communities Neutral Positive/Neutral Positive/Neutral Yes Yes 8. To maximise the use of previously developed land for Positive/Strongly Negative/Neutral Neutral Yes Yes development and to use land efficiently Positive 9. To improve the quality of land and reduce Strongly positive/ Negative/Neutral Neutral Yes Yes contamination Neutral 10. To improve the overall air quality of the Borough Negative Negative Negative Yes Yes 11. To improve water quality Positive Neutral Neutral Yes Yes 12. Will it maintain hydrology / coastal processes? Positive/Neutral Neutral Neutral Yes Yes 13. Will it reduce or minimise greenhouse gas emissions? Positive/Negative Negative Negative Yes Yes 14. To effectively manage the risk of flooding Positive/Neutral Positive/Neutral Neutral Yes Yes 15. To conserve and enhance biodiversity Positive/Negative Positive/Negative Neutral Yes Yes 16. To promote the use of sustainable forms of transport Positive/Negative Positive/Negative Negative/Neutral Yes Yes and reduce travel by car / lorry, where options are available 17. To protect, enhance, and make accessible the historic Positive/Strongly Positive/Strongly Neutral Yes Yes environment and assets, including landscapes (the positive positive quality and character), townscapes and settlement settings 18. To maintain and enhance geological and Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral geomorphological sites 19. To ensure the sustainable use and management of Positive/Strongly Neutral Positive/Neutral Yes Yes natural resources positive 20. To reduce generation and disposal of waste, and Positive Neutral Positive/Neutral Yes Yes achieve sustainable management of waste 21. To enhance quality of, and access to, employment Positive/Strongly Positive/Strongly Positive/Neutral Yes Yes opportunities for everyone positive positive 22. To increase the economic performance of the Strongly positive Positive Positive Yes Yes Borough 23. To encourage investment in local services and facilities Positive Positive Positive/Neutral Yes Yes 24. To encourage sustainable design and practice Strongly positive Strongly positive Neutral Yes Yes 5 Context Flooding More than 50% of the Isle of Sheppey lies below high tide level and depends on substantial sea defences to manage flood risk. A sea defence strategy, developed for the Environment Agency in 1998, recommended measures to improve the defences. A scheme to protect the towns of Sheerness, Queenborough and Rushenden from tidal inundation from the north was implemented in 2001 (the Isle of Sheppey Northern Defences Project). In 2002, the Isle of Sheppey Western Defences Project was initially progressed, however, the project was put on hold in that year and restarted in May 2005. Early potential options for works to the western sea defences (illustrated to right) were developed and comprise: Option 1: Do nothing; Option 2: Maintain existing defences; Option 3: Improve defences along existing line to Kingsferry Bridge; Option 4: Improve defences along existing line to Kingsferry Bridge plus con- struct additional defence south of the trunk road (A249) and railway line; Option 5: Improve defences along existing line to Rushenden and construct new counterwalls inland. Maintain existing defences from Rush- enden to Kingsferry Bridge; and Option 6: As per option 5 except for ‘do nothing’ to existing defences from Rushenden to Kingsferry Bridge. A review of key environmental issues and opportunities associated with the options was undertaken together with a Condition Survey of the island’s existing Western and Southern sea defences and a 2D hydrodynamic modelling study to assess the extent of the flood risk under a range of scenarios. Condition Survey The Condition survey found the Western Defences to be generally of a good standard, but with some localised areas requiring repair. Their Standard of Protection is in excess of that recommended for urban areas (greater than a 1 in 200 likelihood in any year). This differs from the findings of the 1998 strategy, which stated that a lower Standard of Protection exists (1 in 20 likelihood in any year). The variation of the flood risk is primarily due to revised Still Water Level (SWL) data now available using latest research in this field. The revised data show levels that are lower than the levels used in the 1998 strategy for the same return period event (300mm lower for a 1 in 20 year event and 600mm lower for a 1 in 200 year event). Flood defences opposite the Caradon Queenborough Creek entrance Map of Options 4 & 5 site Flooding Flood Risk Modelling Study Queenborough Despite the generally good condition of the Western Defences on the Isle of Sheppey, failure of the island’s Southern defences could cause flooding to the urban areas of Sheerness, Queenborough and Rushenden. Therefore a detailed 2D hydrodynamic modelling assessment was undertaken. The revised Standard of Protection for the worst section of the southern defences is estimated to be 1 in 15 likelihood in any year. The modelling has demonstrated that floodwater from a 1 in 20 and a 1 in 50 year event causing a breach of the southern defences may reach the new A249 road, but would not overtop it. Flood water from a 1 in 100 year to 1 in 200 year event could overtop the A249, but this would not lead to flooding of residential property. The railway line, Sewage Treatment Works and south- eastern part of the industrial estate may still be at risk of flooding, but water would not penetrate as far as Rushenden and Queenborough. The figure to right illustrates this. Conclusions and Way Forward The flood risk to Sheerness, Rushenden and Queenborough is now considered significantly reduced compared with the information presented in the 1998 strategy. There is therefore no requirement in the near future for a major capital works scheme to the Western defences, although maintenance issues remain and will be addressed (Option 2 above). Whilst maintenance issues on the southern defences will be addressed, their long term future is being considered as part of a strategic approach to management in the whole Medway Estuary and Swale. An 1 in 200 Year Flood Extent & Depths estuary Shoreline Management Plan has recently commenced, which will set a high level policy framework for the area. This will lead to more Medway Estuary and Swale Shoreline detailed consideration of the implementation of Management Plan the policies via strategies and capital schemes where appropriate. In May 2007 a consultation draft of the Medway Estuary and Swale Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) was published. This document sets out a large scale assessment of the risks associated with coastal evolution and presents a policy framework to address these in a sustainable manner for the next 100 years. Within the context of this study SMP Policy Unit E 29 covers the area Rushenden to Sheerness. Here it is stated that the long term aim is to “Hold the Line: i.e. to maintain the existing defence line and protect the urban developments. It is acknowledged that habitats will be ‘squeezed’ in latter years however it is Queenborough all tide landing and flood anticipated that this will be balanced by habitat Queenborough Creek entrance flood defences growth in other parts of the estuary defences Context Planning Policy Context Strategic Planning Policy – The Kent and Medway Structure Plan The town of Queenborough and Rushenden has been identified as an area in need of positive Policy NK3 of the Kent and Medway Structure The Draft First Review of the Swale Borough action to achieve economic regeneration for Plan (2006) identifies Queenborough and Local Plan (2005), as Modified, in particular: many years. As indicated previously, the area Rushenden as a strategic development area • Policies AAP6, MU6, and MU7, in respect has suffered in the past from a relatively isolated with the objective of supporting economic of the regeneration of the Queenborough location and poor economic performance regeneration and diversification. It identifies the and Rushenden areas, in the context of a resulting from the decline of local industry. In area for mixed-use development for housing, Masterplan framework, which should include planning policy terms, the town also lies within employment and community facilities in a developer contributions strategy. the Thames Gateway growth area. conjunction with environmental improvements and transport measures, including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Item C1 SW/09/894 – Installation of a Small Scale Biomass Power Plant
    SECTION C MINERALS AND WASTE DISPOSAL Background Documents - the deposited documents, views and representations received as referred to in the reports and included in the development proposals dossier for each case and also as might be additionally indicated. Item C1 SW/09/894 – Installation of a small scale biomass power plant within an existing and extended building for the generation of renewable energy from low grade waste wood at Ridham Dock Road, Iwade, Sittingbourne, Kent A report by Head of Planning Applications Group to Planning Applications Committee on 11 May 2010. SW/09/894 – Installation of a small scale biomass power plant within an existing and extended building for the generation of renewable energy from low grade waste wood at Ridham Dock Road, Iwade, Sittingbourne, Kent ME9 8SR (MR. 921 674) Recommendation: Permission BE GRANTED subject to conditions. Local Member: Mr A Willicombe Classification: Unrestricted Background 1. Planning permission was granted in 2006, for a material recovery facility (MRF), in-vessel composting facility and the continuation of secondary aggregate recycling operations at the Countrystyle Recycling site, Ridham Dock, under planning consent reference SW/05/1392. Under its current consent the site is permitted to handle some 31,000 tonnes of compostable waste and 35,000 tonnes per year of recyclable waste through the MRF. Whilst the permission also allows for the continuation of 10,000 tonnes per annum of secondary aggregate recycling, this activity appears to have all but ceased and replaced with shredding of low grade wood waste. Site Description and Proposal 2. The site itself lies some 2km north of Kemsley, 2.1 km to the east of Iwade and 1.2km to the east of the A249.
    [Show full text]
  • HICL Infrastructure PLC Annual Report 2020 Delivering Real Value
    HICL Infrastructure PLC Annual Report 2020 Delivering Real Value. Bangor and Nendrum Schools, UK Contents 2020 Highlights 2 Overview 01 1.1 Chairman’s Statement 6 Strategic Report 02 2.1 The Infrastructure Market 12 2.2 Investment Proposition 17 2.3 HICL’s Business Model & Strategy 18 2.4 Key Performance & Quality Indicators 20 2.5 Investment Manager’s Report 22 Strategic Report: Performance & Risk 03 3.1 Operating Review 30 3.2 Sustainability Report 34 3.3 Financial Review 50 3.4 Valuation of the Portfolio 55 3.5 The Investment Portfolio 68 3.6 Portfolio Analysis 70 3.7 Risk & Risk Management 72 3.8 Viability Statement 84 3.9 Risk Committee Report 85 3.10 Strategic Report Disclosures 89 Directors’ Report 04 4.1 Board and Governance 94 4.2 Board of Directors 96 4.3 The Investment Manager 98 4.4 Corporate Governance Statement 99 4.5 Audit Committee Report 113 4.6 Directors’ Remuneration Report 118 4.7 Report of the Directors 122 4.8 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 126 Financial Statements 05 5.1 Independent Auditor’s Report 130 5.2 Financial Statements 136 5.3 Notes to the Financial Statements 140 Glossary 180 Directors & Advisers 182 Front cover image: Salford Hospital, UK HICL Infrastructure Company Limited (or “HICL Guernsey”) announced on 21 November 2018 that, following consultation with investors, the Board was of the view that it would be in the best interests of shareholders as a whole to move the domicile of the investment business from Guernsey to the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Swale’S Coast
    The Kent Coast Coastal Access Report This document is part of a larger document produced by Kent Area of the Ramblers’ Association and should not be read or interpreted except as part of that larger document. In particular every part of the document should be read in conjunction with the notes in the Introduction. In no circumstances may any part of this document be downloaded or distributed without all the other parts. Swale’s Coast 4.4 Swale’s Coast 4.4.1 Description 4.4.1.1 Sw ale’s coast starts at TQ828671 at Otterham Quay. It extends for 115 km to TR056650 on Graveney Marshes to the w est of The Sportsman pub. It takes in the Isle of Sheppey w hich is connected to the mainland by tw o bridges at Sw ale. It is the longest coastline in Kent. 4.4.1.2 Approximately 55 km is on PRoWs, 27 km is de facto access (though some is difficult walking) and 33 km is inaccessible to w alkers. The majority of the 27 km of inaccessible coast does not appear to be excepted land. From the Coastal Access aspect it is the most complicated coastline in Kent. Part of the mainland route is along the Saxon Shore Way. 4.4.1.3 The view to seaw ard at the start is over the Medw ay estuary. There are extensive saltings and several uninhabited islands. The route then follows the River Sw ale to Sheppey and back to the Medw ay Estuary. The north and east coasts of Sheppey look out to the Thames Estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Sheppey Road Crossing: Come Ashore on the Mainland Side and Leysdown Walk Craft Sideways Under the Harty Ferry Road Sheppey Crossing Inner Span of Bridge
    Garrison Point INFO KEY The point at which the Swale, the Medway and Thames Club phone 01795 663052 Hazard Estuary tides meet giving rise IOS Round the Island Race to a tidal back eddy. The Cheyney Rock The course is a clockwise circumnavigation of the island, High water 14.35 BST @ 5.87m Recovery point cardinal buoy marks a disused IOS Sailing Club race• • • outfall & posts (keep outside). 'L' shaped area of sand stones starting and finishing at IOS Sailing Club. Low water 08.28 BST @ 0.85m Please note: the Club cannot be held and rocks that dries several responsible for recovering boats retiring at feet high at low water. these points. Any boat that does retire must Start times & class flags phone the clubhouse on 01795 663052. West Cant 10.30 Monohulls PY1120 and over / Sailboards Grain Hard Event car parking Isle of Outfall Start line 11.00 Monohulls PY1031 to 1119 inc. Tripod Post Grain Mid Cant 11.30 Monohulls PY1030 & under Spectator point 12.00 Multihulls Port of Mean low water Finish line Sheerness Minster boom Starboard nav. buoy Marine Parade A wartime submarine trap Greyed area = mean low water Catamaran YC consisting of a line of Spile CYC Compound submerged barges and Port navigation buoy Sheerness wooden posts. Cardinal mark North Kent QB Dolphins Advised route by road to South Kent Marks of old pier remain River Medway at Queenborough. the sailing club on race day The Broadway Minster Queenborough Spit Bosun’s Store A small chandlery B2008 A250 Shallow water S1 B2007 Barton Hill Dr Large sand bank from S2 Leysdown to Shellness - risk of grounding.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling High Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund Full
    Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 October 2018 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION About the Road Safety Foundation The Road Safety Foundation is a UK charity advocating road casualty reduction through simultaneous action on all three components of the safe road system: roads, vehicles and behaviour. The charity has enabled work across each of these components and has published several reports which have provided the basis of new legislation, government policy or practice. For the last decade, the charity has focused on developing the Safe Systems approach, and in particular leading the establishment of the European Road Assessment Programme (EuroRAP) in the UK and, through EuroRAP, the global UK-based charity International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP). Since the inception of EuroRAP in 1999, the Foundation has been the UK member responsible for managing the programme in the UK (and, more recently, Ireland), ensuring that these countries provide a global model of what can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Isle of Sheppey Brochure.Pdf
    Sheerness Dockyard Sheerness Elmley Bird Reserve Bird Elmley i Towns & Villages of Sheppey of Villages & Towns Your Guide to the to Guide Your www.rspb.org.uk/reserves call 01795 665969/01634 222480 or log on to the website: the to on log or 222480 665969/01634 01795 call members. Parking and toilets are available. For more information more For available. are toilets and Parking members. RSPB members are free but there is a small charge for non for charge small a is there but free are members RSPB distance from the bus and train stations train and bus the from distance worth a visit. a worth paddling pool are situated by the beach and within easy walking easy within and beach the by situated are pool paddling birds of prey and aquatic plants, plus much more and certainly and more much plus plants, aquatic and prey of birds companies. The leisure centre and swimming pool, sand pit and pit sand pool, swimming and centre leisure The companies. inhabited by many breeding wetland birds, marsh frogs, insects, frogs, marsh birds, wetland breeding many by inhabited The High Street has may local shops as well as several national several as well as shops local may has Street High The Marshes! The RSPB Reserve has windswept salt marshes that are that marshes salt windswept has Reserve RSPB The Marshes! wilderness left in the south east, come and have a look at Elmley at look a have and come east, south the in left wilderness blow to the town. the to blow Harvest and Flower festival.
    [Show full text]
  • A26 Cycle Route Business Case
    Transport Business Case Report A26 Cycle Route, Tunbridge Wells CO04300618/002 Revision 02 July 2017 Document Control Sheet Project Name: A26 Cycle Route, Tunbridge Wells Project Number: CO04300618 Report Title: Transport Business Case Report Report Number: 002 Issue Prepared Reviewed Approved Status/Amendment 00 (Draft for Name: Various County & Name: Comment) Paul Beecham Borough Council Jeff Webb officers Signature: Signature: Date: 14/06/2017 Date: 19/06/2017 01 (Issue for Gate 1 Name: Various County & Name: submission to SELEP) Paul Beecham Borough Council Jeff Webb officers Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: 22/06/2017 Date: Date: 22/06/2017 02 (Issue for Gate 2 Name: Various County & Name: submission to SELEP) Paul Beecham Borough Council Steve Whittaker officers Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: 22/07/2017 Date: 24/07/17 Date: 25/07/17 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: Project Name A26 Cycle Route, Tunbridge Wells Document Title Transport Business Case Report Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 4 1.1 SELEP Schemes – Business Case Preparation ....................................................... 4 1.2 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................. 4 1.3 Specific Scheme ................................................................................................ 4 2 Scheme Summary .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elmley Church and It's History
    ELMLEY CHURCH AND IT'S HISTORY By Derek Faulkner The small Elmley church had stood on Elmley since c.1247, when it was confirmed and dedicated to St. James. Later, in the reign of Henry 6th, it was in the hands of the Crown but in 1449 he granted the patronage and advowson of it to All Souls College, Oxford, and they continued as it's patrons until it's eventual demise in the 1950's. From then on there was a yearly pension of 40 shillings, payable from the church to the Abbot of St. Mary Graces near the Tower (of London?). In 1640 the rectory was valued in the King's books at £70 and by 1788 still only £80. In 1816, after more than 200 years of dilapidation, it was fitted up again for Divine Service by a Dr. Percy, which seems quite surprising given that the scattered population of Elmley by 1831 was still only 29 people. However, from 1697 it had still continued to have a continuous line of Rectors, appointed to it, almost always the vicar from nearby Iwade church, who would have the responsibility for services at both churches. Among a long list of Rectors names, the stand out one for me was one Savage Tyndall, rector from 1746-1751 - what a splendid name for a vicar! However from 1850 as a brick-making factory and it's subsequent workers' cottages began to take shape alongside Elmley hill, the need for what the church could offer intensified. But before that could happen the church was in need of repairs, substantially so.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Committee, 04/03/2021
    Public Document Pack AGENDA PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING Date: Thursday, 4 March 2021 Time: 7.00 pm Venue: Virtual Meeting Via Skype* Membership: Councillors Cameron Beart, Monique Bonney, Roger Clark, Simon Clark, Richard Darby, Mike Dendor, Tim Gibson (Chairman), James Hall, James Hunt, Carole Jackson, Elliott Jayes (Vice-Chairman), Peter Marchington, Ben J Martin, David Simmons, Paul Stephen, Tim Valentine and Tony Winckless. Quorum = 6 RECORDING NOTICE Please note: this meeting may be recorded and the recording may be published on the Council’s website. At the start of the meeting the Chairman will confirm if all or part of the meeting is being audio recorded. The whole of the meeting will be recorded, except where there are confidential or exempt items. You should be aware that the Council is a Data Controller under the Data Protection Act. Data collected during this recording will be retained in accordance with the Council’s data retention policy. Therefore by attending the meeting and speaking at Committee you are consenting to being recorded and to the possible use of those sound records for training purposes. If you have any queries regarding this please contact Democratic Services. Pages Information for the Public *Members of the press and public can listen to this meeting live. Details of how to join the meeting will be added to the website after 4pm on Wednesday 3 March 2021. Privacy Statement Swale Borough Council (SBC) is committed to protecting the privacy and security of your personal information. As data controller we ensure that processing is carried out in accordance with the Data Protection Act 2018 and the General Data Protection Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Wealth Machine ESSU Research Report No 6
    European Services Strategy Unit Research Report No. 6 PPP Wealth Machine __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ UK and Global trends in trading project ownership Dexter Whitfield Financialisation of public infrastructure Market values imposed on public assets Growth of offshore infrastructure funds Secondary market trading UK and Global PPP equity databases PPP Wealth Machine: UK and Global trends in trading project ownership European Services Strategy Unit PPP Equity Database The database can be accessed and downloaded at http://www.european-services-strategy.org.uk/ppp-database/ppp-equity-database/ December 2012 Amended January 2014: Table 4: Annual rate and value of UK PPP equity transactions (1998-2012) Many thanks to Stewart Smyth, Lecturer, Queens University Management Schools, Belfast for advice and comments on the draft and to Jo Chadwick for design of the ESSU database. Dexter Whitfield, Director Adjunct Associate Professor, Australian Workplace Innovation and Social Research Centre, University of Adelaide Mobile +44 (0)777 6370884 Tel. +353 (0)66 7130225 Email: [email protected] Web: www.european-services-strategy.org.uk The European Services Strategy Unit is committed to social justice, through
    [Show full text]
  • Sheppey Outdoors Country Break
    Outdoors An Outdoors Break in... The Swale The Isle of Sheppey Kent’s Treasure Island This Country Break explores the Isle of Sheppey, one of England’s few true islands, sited at the mouths of the Thames and the Medway and cut off from the rest of Kent by the tidal channel and estuary known as the Swale. At just 36 square miles the island packs a lot in, from the miles of beaches (perfect for lazing on or getting wet from), its acres of low-lying marshes making it one of the best places in UK to see birds of prey, to its renowned fossil beds which provide regular prehistoric finds. Scratch a little beneath the surface and you’ll also discover more history and heritage per square mile than just about anywhere else in the country. Uncover the strong maritime tradition, stand on the same soil as Saxon Queens, Dutch Invaders and famous writers, and for the piece-de-résistance visit the site of the birthplace of UK aviation. So forget what you think you know about Sheppey and come and take a fresh look, you’re sure to find something surprising! Find out more at www.visitsheppey.com 1 The Great Outdoors... Contains Ordnance Survey Data © Crown Copyright and Database Right 2011 With its big skies, rolling landscape and miles of beaches and marsh, Sheppey is a great choice for getting out and about in the great outdoors, and there are no shortage of ways to do so... fortunately we’ve done the hard work, so here are the very best! These are just a few ideas so feel free to mix it up or swap them Getting There around, combine with any events that are on in the area (remember to check local websites and magazines) and in short The Isle of Sheppey is easily make it an experience of your own.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Sheppey Overview of Natural England’S Statutory Reports to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
    ww.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Isle of Sheppey Overview of Natural England’s statutory reports to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 1 England Coast Path | Isle of Sheppey | Overview Map A: Key Map – Isle of Sheppey 2 England Coast Path | Isle of Sheppey | Overview Report number and title IOS 1: Kingsferry Bridge to Alsager Avenue, Rushenden (Maps IOS 1a to IOS 1b) IOS 2: Alsager Avenue, Rushenden to Oak Lane, Minster (Maps IOS 2a to IOS 2f) IOS 3: Oak Lane, Minster to Hen’s Brook, Eastchurch Gap (Maps IOS 3a to IOS 3b) IOS 4: Hen’s Brook, Eastchurch Gap to Palm Trees Holiday Park (Map IOS 4a) IOS 5: Palm Trees Holiday Park to Warden Road, Warden Point (Map IOS 5a) IOS 6: Warden Road, Warden Point to Isle of Harty (east) (Maps IOS 6a to IOS 6g) IOS 7: Isle of Harty (east) to Mocketts, Isle of Harty (west) (Maps IOS 7a to IOS 7b) IOS 8: Mocketts, Isle of Harty (west) to Windmill Creek (Maps IOS 8a to IOS 8c) IOS 9: Windmill Creek to Ferry Road (Maps IOS 9a to IOS 9f) IOS 10: Ferry Road to Swale Station via Kingsferry Bridge (Map IOS 10a) Using the Key Map Map A (opposite) shows the whole of the Isle of Sheppey stretch divided into shorter numbered lengths of coast. Each number on Map A corresponds to the report which relates to that length of coast. To find our proposals for a particular place, find the place on Map A and note the number of the report which includes it.
    [Show full text]