Vashon Island Passenger-Only Ferry Study: Technology Demonstration Phase and Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vashon Island Passenger-Only Ferry Study: Technology Demonstration Phase and Final Report Vashon Island Passenger-Only Ferry Study: Technology Demonstration Phase and Final Report APRIL 2015 FTA Report No. 0089 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Greg Lerner, King County Department of Transportation, Marine Division Carla Leigh Sawyer, Progressions WITH SUPPORT FROM Mike Anderson, KPFF COVER PHOTO King County staff. All report photos courtesy of King County unless otherwise noted. DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Vashon Island Passenger-Only Ferry Study: Technology Demonstration Phase and Final Report APRIL 2015 FTA Report No. 0089 PREPARED BY Greg Lerner, King County Department of Transportation, Marine Division Carla Leigh Sawyer, Progressions WITH SUPPORT FROM Mike Anderson, KPFF SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE http://www.fta.dot.gov/research FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i MetricMetric Conversion Conversion Table Table Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or "t") (or "metric ton") TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) 5 (F-32)/9 oF Fahrenheit Celsius oC or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION iv FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruc- tions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED April 2015 2009 - 2014 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Vashon Island Passenger-Only Ferry Study: Technology Demonstration Phase WA-26-7008 and Final Report 6. AUTHOR(S) Greg Lerner, King County Dept. of Transportation, Marine Division Carla Leigh Sawyer, Progressions 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESSE(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER King County Dept. of Transportation, Marine Division 201 South Jackson Street FTA Report No. 0089 Seattle WA 98104 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT U.S. Department of Transportation NUMBER Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation FTA Report No. 0089 East Building 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES [http://www.fta.dot.gov/research] 12A. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12B. DISTRIBUTION CODE Available from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA 22161. Phone 703.605.6000, Fax 703.605.6900, email [[email protected]] TRI 13. ABSTRACT This report summarizes work performed in earlier phases of this project to prepare for implementation of a County-operated passenger- only ferry service and documents the demonstration of three technology-based passenger ferry traveler information initiatives. The first two phases produced a policy study for County-operated passenger ferry service and a business and implementation plan for introduction of the service. The final phase evaluated opportunities for introducing technology to improve ferry traveler information, selected the most promising and feasible three technology options, and demonstrated and evaluated the three technology initiatives. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Passenger ferry traveler information technology, variable message sign, VMS 251 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 6 Section 1: Introduction, Background, and Objectives 17 Section 2: Technology Demonstration Phase Approach 26 Section 3: Technology Demonstration Phase: Design and Implementation 36 Section 4: Technology Demonstration Evaluation and Lessons Learned 46 Section 5: Conclusions 48 Glossary Appendix A: King County Waterborne Transit Policy Study Appendix B: King County Business Plan for the Vashon Island Passenger-Only Ferry Appendix C: King County Passenger-Only Ferry Project Briefing Paper Appendix D: Transportation Survey: Vashon Water Taxi Riders Appendix E: Technology Options Scoring Matrix Appendix F: Demonstration Project Definition and Phased Implementation Plan Appendix G: Water Taxi Website Improvement Rider Survey Appendix H: Water Taxi Website User Testing Questions Appendix I: Water Taxi Website User Testing Observations Appendix J: King County Water Taxi Post-Implementation Website Survey Appendix K: Vashon Island Technology Demonstration Evaluation Protocol FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION vi LIST OF FIGURES 2 Figure ES-1: Pier 50 Variable Message Sign 3 Figure ES-2: Enhanced KCMD Water Taxi home page 4 Figure ES-3: King County WaterTaxiWatch page 6 Figure 1-1: City of Seattle on the Seattle waterfront, circa 1890 6 Figure 1-2: Seattle waterfront 1907 7 Figure 1-3: Boeing jetfoil in Elliott Bay, Puget Sound 8 Figure 1-4: WSF’s first passenger-only ferry, MV Tyee 8 Figure 1-5: WSF’s MV Skagit 9 Figure 1-6: WSF’s MV Chinook 11 Figure 1-7: Vashon Island to Downtown Seattle route 11 Figure 1-8: West Seattle to Downtown Seattle route 13 Figure 1-9: Pier 50 Downtown Seattle 14 Figure 1-10: Vashon Island Terminal 14 Figure 1-11: Seacrest Park dock in West Seattle 15 Figure 1-12: On-dock automated TVM 15 Figure 1-13: Portable fare transaction processing device for ORCA cards 27 Figure 3-1: VMS mounting location 27 Figure 3-2: Water Taxi Pier 50 dock site map with sign location 28 Figure 3-3: VMS screens 29 Figure 3-4: VMS installation timeline 29 Figure 3-5: Initial VMS location 29 Figure 3-6: VMS interim location 30 Figure 3-7: Existing KCMD Water Taxi home page 31 Figure 3-8: Enhanced KCMD Water Taxi homepage 31 Figure 3-9: Enhanced KCMD website drop-down schedule display 32 Figure 3-10: Enhanced KCMD website drop-down fare display 33 Figure 3-11: WSF VesselWatch page 35 Figure 3-12: King County WaterTaxiWatch page 42 Figure 4-1: Ease of finding information on website 42 Figure 4-2: Amount of information on website 43 Figure 4-3: Website appearance 43 Figure 4-4: Amount of time spent on website 45 Figure 4-5: Water Taxi ridership, June 2010–May 2014 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION vii LIST OF TABLES 12 Table 1-1: Vashon Island and West Seattle Winter Daily Schedules 13 Table 1-2: West Seattle Extended Service Summer Schedule 25 Table 2-1: Technology Options Evaluation Results 41 Table 4-1: Page Views Before and After Implementation of Enhanced Website 41 Table 4-2: Average Time on Page (secs) FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the King County Department of Transportation for their support of this project. Former and current King County Marine Division directors Scott Davis and Paul Brodeur provided leadership and support to the project. The authors would also like to thank Washington State Ferries for its participation in the vessel location project. The project benefitted from the support and guidance of FTA, particularly Charlene Wilder for her involvement throughout the many phases of the project. The feedback and suggestions offered by ferry riders throughout the project was invaluable. We thank them. ABSTRACT This report summarizes work performed in earlier phases of this project to prepare for implementation of a County-operated passenger-only ferry service and documents the demonstration of three technology-based passenger ferry traveler information initiatives. The first two phases produced a policy study for County-operated passenger ferry service and a business and implementation plan for introduction of the service. The final phase evaluated opportunities for introducing technology to improve ferry traveler information, selected the most promising and feasible three technology options, and demonstrated and evaluated the three technology initiatives. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ix EXECUTIVE Washington State Ferries introduced modern-day passenger-only ferry service SUMMARY on Puget Sound in 1989. As revenue to support the Washington State Ferries diminished, the State decided to dedicate its revenue to auto ferry service, relinquishing
Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Final Report on Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Dhaka, Bangladesh Prepared By: NOOR-E-ALAM Superintending Engineer Roads and Highways Department Dhaka, Bangladesh October 2018 Sustainable Urban Transportation Index (SUTI) for Dhaka, Bangladesh Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Study area .................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Objectives of the study ................................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER 2: CURRENT STATE OF URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS ............................ 4 2.1 Major transport network and systems ......................................................................... 4 2.2 Key connection points of DMA .................................................................................. 5 2.3 Existing transport situation of Dhaka city ................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Major transport modes of Dhaka city .................................................................. 7 2.3.2 Modal share in Dhaka city ................................................................................... 8 2.3.3 Environmental perspective ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Port of San Francisco Water Taxi Feasibility Study
    PortPort ofof SanSan FranciscoFrancisco WaterWater TaxiTaxi FeasibilityFeasibility StudyStudy Presentation to San Francisco Port Commission Water Taxi December 8, 2009 Veronica Sanchez Consulting Walther Engineering Services ScopeScope ofof StudyStudy ¾ IsIs therethere ridershipridership demanddemand forfor waterwater taxitaxi service?service? ¾ WhatWhat cancan wewe learnlearn fromfrom otherother otherother citycity’’ss waterwater taxitaxi systems?systems? ¾ WhatWhat areare capitalcapital andand operatingoperating requirementsrequirements forfor PSFPSF toto startstart thisthis service?service? Port of San Francisco Water Taxi Feasibility Study Veronica Sanchez Consulting September 2009 Walther Engineering Services IsIs therethere RidershipRidership Demand?Demand? ¾ #1 Market Niche: F-Line Diversions ¾ F-Line has overcapacity problems. Wait times are longer than travel time at peak. • Conservative Assumption: 522-576 daily riders • Aggressive assumption 1306-1440 daily riders Compare: Harbor Bay: 620 daily riders. Port of San Francisco Water Taxi Feasibility Study Veronica Sanchez Consulting September 2009 Walther Engineering Services IsIs therethere RidershipRidership Demand?Demand? ¾ #2 Market Niche: Repeat visitors (17.5%) may be looking for a different shoreline experience ¾ #3 Visitor Attractions & Destinations z Example: Exploratorium Opening in 2014. z Special events Port of San Francisco Water Taxi Feasibility Study Veronica Sanchez Consulting September 2009 Walther Engineering Services IsIs therethere RidershipRidership Demand?Demand?
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Cards Contents
    Smart cards Contents 1 Smart card 1 1.1 History ................................................ 1 1.1.1 Invention ........................................... 1 1.1.2 Carte Bleue .......................................... 2 1.1.3 EMV ............................................. 2 1.1.4 Development of contactless systems ............................. 2 1.2 Design ................................................ 2 1.2.1 Contact smart cards ..................................... 3 1.2.2 Contactless smart cards .................................... 3 1.2.3 Hybrids ............................................ 4 1.3 Applications .............................................. 4 1.3.1 Financial ........................................... 4 1.3.2 SIM .............................................. 4 1.3.3 Identification ......................................... 4 1.3.4 Public transit ......................................... 5 1.3.5 Computer security ...................................... 6 1.3.6 Schools ............................................ 6 1.3.7 Healthcare .......................................... 6 1.3.8 Other uses .......................................... 6 1.3.9 Multiple-use systems ..................................... 6 1.4 Security ................................................ 6 1.5 Benefits ................................................ 6 1.6 Problems ............................................... 7 1.7 See also ................................................ 7 1.8 Further reading ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ovidem Videlig Nitibus Dolupta Il Illacid Ut As Magniti Bus Daerspe Helping
    NorthNorth American American Helping people, places EditionEdition IssueIssue 18 19 and economies thrive FebruaryFebruary 2018 2019 The Review Spotlight Infrastructure Movement Matters Integrated The future of transit Exciting new series modeling and infrastructure of inspirational policy implications investment in events The ReviewCanada The Review Spotlight Market Technology Ovidem videlig Pudignis quodit, Accabor sequiam, Understanding the corporpore eaquodi tem cum landis dite Transit Ecosystem: nitibus dolupta il dolupid molorpos consequiatem ut vel Where to Innovate maximus ciatures eum et ventia dolut illacid ut as magniti enihilicimin es porrum esed est, The Reviewseque diam, quiatus bus daerspe The Review steergroup.com Movement Matters A BURST OF FRESH THINKING To attend any of our Movement Matters events register at: steergroup.com/events 2 Movement Matters is a series of inspirational thought leadership events exploring new ideas about people, places and economies. Drawing on experience from leaders around the globe, these sessions provide a burst of fresh thinking and a great opportunity for industry networking. Read more about our international program of events in the U.S., Canada and U.K. BEYOND ALTERNATIVE CHANGING TRANSPORT DELIVERY TRAVEL MOBILITY MODELS BEHAVIOR Toronto, Canada New York, U.S. Los Angeles, U.S. Spring 2019 Spring 2019 Summer 2019 With soaring housing prices and a rise Industry experts will discuss alternative In Los Angeles, where funding is being in urban population, how can city and models for financing and delivering poured into transportation infrastructure, regional leaders plan for a livable, infrastructure projects. The panel is the moto ‘build it and they will come’ equitable and mobile future? Transport will consider private sector delivery, enough? Opportunities to take advantage investment can act as a catalyst to public involvement, and public-private of best practices such as personalized economic development and the creation partnerships (P3s).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Transit Strategic Plan June 22, 2015
    i Baltimore Water Transit Strategic Plan June 22, 2015 Acknowledgments This report is prepared for the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) with assistance from Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP and funded through a grant provide by the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board, the Maryland Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation. City of Baltimore Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Mayor William M. Johnson, Director of Transportation Lindsay Wines, Deputy Director, Administration Veronica P. McBeth, Transit Bureau Chief Valorie LaCour, RLA, LEED AP, Division Chief, Transportation Planning Project Team BCDOT Linda Taylor-Newton, City Planner II Ciara M. Willis, Transit Services Administrator Frances Knauff - Dockmaster Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP Thomas J. Hannan, PE, Senior Vice President James M. Ritchey, Vice President Patrick R. Christian, Transit Technical Specialist Andrea Trabelsi, AICP, Transportation Planner Wendy Haubert, Geographic Information System Specialist Abbi Hoff, Graphics Artist Special thanks to eleven business and community leaders who participated in a Water Transit Workshop on February 24, 2015 including representatives from Greater Baltimore Committee, Waterfront Partnership, Under Armour, Legg Mason, Workshop Development, Watermark Cruises, Baltimore Development Corporation, Locust Point Civic Association, Baltimore Zipcar, and Cruise Maryland. Harbor Care, LLC the operator of the Water Taxi and Harbor Connector cooperated fully over the course of the study providing
    [Show full text]
  • Ferry & Water Taxi Handout 1
    Port of San Francisco To Vallejo FERRY SYSTEM Since 1875 ferries have been a primary means of transportation in the San Francisco Bay Area. The historic Ferry Building at the foot of Market Street, was established as the main terminus for people Ferry Service Routes boarding and disembarking ferries to various locations in the Bay and Delta areas. Today, it continues to serve San Francisco’s financial, commercial, and tourism centers, providing transportation to over Larkspur Port of San Francisco 16,000 passengers daily. Ferry terminals at China Basin and Pier 41 primarily serve visitor attractions Landing June 13, 2016 at AT&T Ballpark and Fisherman’s Wharf with access to the lightrail system along The Embarcadero. Ferry Services & Routes San Francisco Bay Ferry Blue & Gold Fleet Golden Gate Ferry Tiburon www.sanfranciscobayferry.com www.blueandgoldfleet.com www.goldengateferry.org San Francisco Sausalito Bay Alameda Main St. AT&T Park Pier 41 Sausalito San Francisco Sausalito Ferry Building Ferry Building Larkspur Pier 41 Sausalito Pier 41 South Pier 41 Jack London Square, San Francisco Tiburon Ferry Building Oakland AT&T Park Alameda San Francisco Tiburon Downtown Terminal Oakland Ferry Building Pier 41 Vallejo Ferry Building Harbor Bay Ferry Building Alameda AT&T Park Oakland AT&T Park Terminals Ferry Building Pier 41 South San Francisco Downtown Ferry Terminal and Golden Gate Ferry Terminal Downtown Terminal San Francisco Harbor Bay Ferry Building Alameda are located behind the Ferry Oakland San Francisco Vallejo Building at the
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Harbor Connector Ferry
    Inner Harbor Connector Ferry Business Plan for New Water Transportation Service 1 2 Inner Harbor Connector Contents The Inner Harbor Connector 3 Overview 4 Why Ferries 5 Ferries Today 7 Existing Conditions 7 Best Practices 10 Comprehensive Study Process 13 Collecting Ideas 13 Forecasting Ridership 14 Narrowing the Dock List 15 Selecting Routes 16 Dock Locations and Conditions 19 Long Wharf North and Central (Downtown/North End) 21 Lewis Mall (East Boston) 23 Navy Yard Pier 4 (Charlestown) 25 Fan Pier (Seaport) 27 Dock Improvement Recommendations 31 Long Wharf North and Central (Downtown/North End) 33 Lewis Mall (East Boston) 34 Navy Yard Pier 4 (Charlestown) 35 Fan Pier (Seaport) 36 Route Configuration and Schedule 39 Vessel Recommendations 41 Vessel Design and Power 41 Cost Estimates 42 Zero Emissions Alternative 43 Ridership and Fares 45 Multi-modal Sensitivity 47 Finances 51 Overview 51 Pro Forma 52 Assumptions 53 Funding Opportunities 55 Emissions Impact 59 Implementation 63 Appendix 65 1 Proposed route of the Inner Harbor Connector ferry 2 Inner Harbor Connector The Inner Harbor Connector Authority (MBTA) ferry service between Charlestown and Long Wharf, it should be noted that the plans do not specify There is an opportunity to expand the existing or require that the new service be operated by a state entity. ferry service between Charlestown and downtown Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Boston to also serve East Boston and the South and the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) were Boston Seaport and connect multiple vibrant both among the funders of this study and hope to work in neighborhoods around Boston Harbor.
    [Show full text]
  • P I K E P L a C E M a R K
    PDA Council Meeting Agenda Date: Thursday, September 27th, 2018 Time: 4:00 p.m. – 6:00p.m. Location: The Classroom Committee Members: Rico Quirindongo (Chair), Betty Halfon (Vice-Chair), Matt Hanna, David Ghoddousi, Patrice Barrentine, Ray Ishii, Colleen Bowman, Paul Neal, Devin McComb, Mark Brady, Ali Mowry, and Jim Savitt 4:00pm I. Administrative: Chair A. Approval of Agenda B. Approval of the PDA Council Meeting Minutes for August 30th, 2018 4:05pm II. Public Comment Including the Market Community 4:15pm III. Programs and Information Items A. Council Chair Report Chair B. Director Report Mary Bacarella C. Committee Chair Reports D. Other Reports 4:40pm IV. Key Issues Presentation and Discussion Items A. Market Commons First Year Report Christine Craig & Lisa Stirgus B. MarketFront/PC-1 North Development Close-Out Agreement Gerry Johnson and Matt Briefing Hanna C. PDA Council Retreat Agenda Discussion Ted Sive 5:40pm V. Action Items A. Consent Agenda Chair i. Proposed Resolution 18-40: Authorization for Contract Authority – Replacement of Current PPMPDA IT Server Room AC System ii. Proposed Resolution 18-41: Authorization for Contract Authority – Expansion of Current PPMPDA Security Camera System iii. Proposed Resolution 18-42: Authorization for Contract Authority – Replace Roofing System on the Livingston Building iv. Proposed Resolution 18-43: Authorization for Contract Authority – Repair Gutter System on the South Entrance Pergola v. Proposed Resolution 18-44: Lease Proposals September 2018 B. New Business i. Proposed Resolution 18-45: Authorization for the Renewal of Mary Bacarella the Hildt-Licata Agreement ii. Proposed Resolution 18-46: Redeeming of Pike Place Market Sabina Proto Series B Bond 5:50pm VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan
    KING COUNTY FERRY DISTRICT 2014 STRATEGIC PLAN 2014 – 2018 Prepared by: ECONorthwest )'3231-'7*-2%2')40%22-2+ In association with: TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction Strategic Planning Process Situation Assessment Service and Ridership Financial Situation Summary Assessment Strategic Plan Vision Goals Strategies Road Map Forward Optimize Service Determine Level of Service Determine Appropriate Levy Rate Monitor Performance KING COUNTY FERRY DISTRICT: 2014 – 2018 STRATEGIC PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This strategic plan is intended as a guide for the King County Council and Ferry District Board of Directors, their staff, and the King County Marine Division for delivering water taxi service over the next three to five years. The development of this strategic plan involved input and coordination of the Executive Committee of the Ferry District Board of Directors and their staff, as well as staff and representatives from the King County Marine Division, King County Council Central Staff, King County Department of Transportation, and the King County Executive Office. The process also engaged a stakeholder advisory group representing an array of interests convened to review the plan’s development and provide Image courtesy of the the West Seattle Herald input in a series of three meetings. STRATEGIC PLAN The planning process and advisory group The plan expresses the vision and goals for Goals identified a number of strengths, weaknesses, water taxi service in King County for the next opportunities, and challenges for water taxi ▪ Goal 1. Provide Reliable and Safe Service three to five years. The strategies are the service in King County.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Di‘Erent Route Through Downtown Buses Continuing INTERBAY Swedish S
    N 152 St to Shoreline CC Snohomish County– to Aurora toAuroraVill toMtlk to Richmond NE 150 St toWoodinvilleviaBothell 373 5 SHORELINE 355 Village Beach Downtown Seattle toNSt Terr to Shoreline CC toUWBothell 308 512 402 405 410 412 347 348 77 330 309 toHorizonView 312 413 415 416 417 421 NE 145 St 373 308 NE 145 St ­toKenmoreP&R N 145 St 304 316 Transit in Seattle 422 425 435 510 511 65 308 toUWBothell 513 Roosevelt Wy N Frequencies shown are for daytime period. See Service Guide N 143 St 28 Snohomish County– 346 512 301 303 73 522 for a complete summary of frequencies and days of operation. 5 64 University District 5 E 304 308 For service between 1:30–4:30 am see Night Owl map. 512 810 821 855 860 E N 871 880 y 3 Av NW 3 Av Jackson Park CEDAR W Frequent Service N 135 St Golf Course OLYMPIC y Linden Av N Linden Av PARK t Bitter i Every 15 minutes or better, until 7 pm, Monday to Friday. C HILLS weekdays Lake e 372 Most lines oer frequent service later into the night and on NW 132 St Ingraham k a Ashworth Av N Av Ashworth N Meridian Av NE 1 Av NE 15 Av NE 30 Av L weekends. Service is less frequent during other times. (express) 373 77 N 130 St Roosevelt Wy NE 372 weekends 28 345 41 Link Light Rail rapid transit North- every 10 minutes BITTER LAKE acres 8 Av NW 8 Av Park 5 NW 125 St N 125 St Haller NE 125 St E RapidRide limited stop bus for a faster ride 345 Lake NE 125 St every 10–12 minutes 346 PINEHURST 8 Frequent Bus every 10–12 minutes BROADVIEW 99 347 348 continues as LAKE CITY 75 Frequent Bus every 15 minutes 41 345 NE 120 St Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • Water Taxi Faqs
    King County Marine Division Water Taxi Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the King County Water Taxi? The King County Water Taxi is a passenger-only ferry service moving commuters, recreational riders and tourists between downtown Seattle and West Seattle, along with providing commute service from downtown Seattle to Vashon Island. Water Taxi service is a fast transit alternative operated by the King County Marine Division (Marine Division) as part of the King County Department of Transportation. The Marine Division is responsible for operations, moorage and vessel maintenance. 2. Where do King County Water Taxis operate? Water Taxis currently serve routes from downtown Seattle’s Pier 50 to the Vashon Island Ferry Terminal and West Seattle’s Seacrest dock. Recently, the King County Council requested a study be conducted to research and propose additional ferry routes. As a result of this study, three potential new routes may be considered by the Council this year. 3. How often do King County Water Taxis operate? The Vashon Island route operates six (6) roundtrips Monday through Friday during peak commute hours. Each one-way trip is approximately 22 minutes long. From November through March, the West Seattle route operates 13 roundtrips Monday through Friday during peak commute hours. From April through October, there are between 12 and 23 roundtrips offered daily during peak commute hours, mid-days, evenings and weekends. Each one-way trip takes approximately 10 to 15 minutes. 4. How many passengers ride King County Water Taxis? Ridership continues to grow annually, with more than 3.1 million passengers served since the start of King County service in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Admiral Junction, Alki, Seacrest Park
    ORCA Card Metro Customer Services Metro Transit and nine other Puget Sound At Metro’s Customer Services office you can buy transportation providers (Community Transit, ORCA cards, bus passes, senior permits and taxi Everett Transit, Kitsap Transit, Pierce Transit, scrip, get information about bus service, register for Sound Transit, Seattle Streetcar, King County disability permits and retrieve items turned into 775 Water Taxi, the Seattle Center Monorail and Lost & Found. Customer Service hours may change Washington State Ferries) use a common fare- in response to public health guidance. Admiral Junction, payment system called ORCA (One Regional Card for All). The ORCA card works as cash or a pass, King Street Center Lost & Found Alki, and it automatically tracks the value of your fares 201 S Jackson St Monday–Friday and transfers, letting you move easily between the Monday–Friday 8:30 a.m.–1 p.m. Seacrest Park participating transportation systems. 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m. 2 p.m.–4:30 p.m. Get your ORCA card online at www.orcacard.com, Seattle metro calling area .................. 206-553-3000 by phone at 1-888-988-6722 (ORCA) or WA Relay: Toll Free ........................................ 1-800-542-7876 711 (1-888-889-6368), at ticket vending machines Hearing impaired ............................ WA Relay: 711 in Sounder and Link rail stations, or at one of the Carpool/Vanpool ................................ 206-625-4500 transit agency customer service offices. The ORCA Hearing Impaired ........ WA Relay: 1-800-833-6388 website also provides information on how to use September 19, 2020 thru March 19, 2021 the card, as well as locations at which they can be Community Transit.........................
    [Show full text]