DOCSLIB.ORG

East Community Assembly Area Areas and Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East Community Assembly Area Areas and Sites Transformation and Sustainability SHEFFIELD LOCAL PLAN (formerly Sheffield Development Framework) CITY POLICIES AND SITES DOCUMENT EAST COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY AREA AREAS AND SITES BACKGROUND REPORT Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street SHEFFIELD S1 2SH June 2013 CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. Introduction 1 Part 1: Lower Don Valley Core Strategy Sub area Covers: Darnall Ward (excluding Handsworth) 2. Lower Don Valley Policy Areas 19 3. Lower Don Valley Allocated Sites 83 Part 2: South East Urban Core Strategy Sub area Covers: Manor Castle Ward, Arbourthorne Ward, Richmond Ward, and part of Darnall Ward (at Handsworth). A small part lies within the South East Community Assembly Area report ) 4. South East Urban Policy Areas 173 5. South East Urban Area Allocated Sites 227 1 INTRODUCTION The Context 1.1 This report provides evidence to support the published policies for the City Policies and Sites document of the Sheffield Local Plan. 1.2 The Sheffield Local Plan is the new name, as used by the Government, for what was known as the Sheffield Development Framework. It is Sheffield’s statutory development plan, which the local planning authority is required by law to produce. 1.3 The Local Plan includes the Core Strategy, which has already been adopted, having been subject to formal public examination. It sets out the vision and objectives for the Local Plan and establishes its broad spatial strategy. 1.4 The City Policies and Sites document now supplements this, containing: - Criteria-based policies to inform development management and design guidance - Policy on land uses appropriate to a range of area types across the city - Allocations of particular sites for specific uses 1.5 The document was originally proposed to be two, City Policies and City Sites. Both of these have already been subject to two stages of consultation: - Emerging Options - Preferred Options 1.6 The Emerging Options comprised the broad choices, which were drawn up to enable the Council to consider and consult on all the possibilities early in the process of drawing up the document1. Having consulted on these options the Council decided which to take forward as Preferred Options. 1.7 The Preferred Options were published and consulted on as the ones that the Council was minded to take forward to submission2. However, the choice of option and the way it was expressed remained subject to public comment. The Preferred Options document outlined how the Council had arrived at them and the justification for choosing them. It also indicated which Emerging Options had been rejected and why. 1 Emerging Options for City Policies, Sheffield City Council (February 2006) and Emerging Options for City Sites, Sheffield City Council (February 2006) – see Sheffield City Council - Emerging Options 2006 2 Preferred Options for City Policies, Sheffield City Council (April 2007) and Preferred Options for City Sites, Sheffield City Council (April 2007) – see Sheffield City Council - Preferred Options 2007 - 1 - 1.8 Work following the Preferred Options was delayed whilst priority was given to the public examination of the Core Strategy. In the subsequent version, the Consultation Draft3, the policy areas and allocations were updated to reflect changing circumstances. A further consultation was carried out on additional sites for allocation. 1.9 The present version of the City Policies and Sites document has been published as the Council’s final version, including additional allocations. This is for final representations by stakeholders and other members of the public, followed by submission to the Government and public examination. A schedule of changes may be produced following representations and a final chapter will be added to each Background Report to explain why the changes have been proposed. 1.10 The Background Reports set out the Council’s evidence for considering that the policies are sound. That is the issue on which representations are invited, in line with national policy. The policy document itself has space only to summarise the reasons for the chosen policies and allocations. So, the more detailed evidence and analysis is found in the Background Reports. 1.11 The Background Reports are not actually part of the Sheffield Local Plan but contribute to the statutory process of preparing it. So they are not published as the subject for representations though comments on the soundness of the area designations and site allocations may well take up evidence or conclusions set out in the Reports. 1.12 This Report supports the published policy areas and site allocations for the East Community Assembly Area. Different Core Strategy Areas are dealt with in distinct parts of the report, reflecting the underlying common factors for each component of the spatial strategy. 1.13 For each subarea, there are chapters on: • Strategic Context • Policy Areas • Allocated Sites 1.14 Each section within these chapters deals with principal themes from the soundness criteria: • Consistency with national and other strategic policy • Justification • Effectiveness • Conclusions – drawing together the strands under the four criteria for soundness set out in the National Planning Policy Framework. 3 City Policies and Sites: Consultation Draft (May 2010) – see Sheffield City Council - City Policies and Sites - 2 - 1.15 There are many references in the report to policy areas. These are explained in Part 2 of the City Policies and Sites document (chapter 11), which includes policy H1. More detailed justification on the policy area types and their menus of land uses is contained in the relevant Policy Background Reports as follows. This applies across all areas of the city and is not repeated in each area report. Policy Area Policy Background Report Business Areas Economy and City Region Business and Industrial Areas Economy and City Region Industrial Areas Economy and City Region General Employment Areas Economy and City Region Meadowhall Shopping Centre Economy and City Region University and College Areas Economy and City Region Housing Areas Neighbourhoods Central Housing Areas Neighbourhoods Flexible Use Areas Neighbourhoods District Centres Neighbourhoods Neighbourhood Centres Neighbourhoods Open Space Areas Opportunities and Well-being Waste Management Areas Global Environment and Natural Resources Countryside Areas: Green Belt Character and Heritage The Area 1.16 The East Area is split geographically into two main parts, and the structure of this report reflects this split. - 3 - 1.17 The northern part is identified in the Core Strategy as the Lower Don Valley4. This is dealt with in Part 1. The Core Strategy identifies the Lower Don Valley as a strategic location for economic activity, acting as a focus for employment, leisure, recreation and sporting activities, and these will be the main users of land. These land uses benefit the whole city, but to support the Local Plan objective of economic transformation in this area, investment in transport will be very important. It will be a challenge to ensure that the Lower Don Valley is well connected by all modes of transport to different parts of the city and city region to enable people and goods to move about, whilst meeting objectives for reducing impacts on the environment. 1.18 The southern part of the East Area forms part of the area identified in the Core Strategy as the South East Urban Area. This is dealt with in Part 2. The area consists primarily of several distinct residential areas where housing is the main use of land. It includes some priority areas where land has been released for new housing to encourage the revival of the housing market. The emphasis in this area will be on supporting successful neighbourhoods, encouraging new housing and a range of other uses to make these areas more sustainable places in which to live. 1.19 There is a very small part of the East Community Assembly Area, (south of Linley Lane and Normanton Spring Road) that falls within the Mosborough/Woodhouse Core Strategy Area and this is covered by the South East Area Background Report. Also a small industrial area at Olive Grove Road that falls within the Sheaf Valley and Neighbouring Areas Core Strategy Area and this will be covered by the South Area Background Report. 1.20 The Core Strategy spatial vision describes the outcome for the Lower Don Valley as follows: ‘The Lower and Upper Don Valleys will complement the City Centre, as primary locations for employment supported by a mix of related uses and providing for developments not appropriate in the City Centre’5. 1.21 The policy area designations and allocation of sites in the Lower Don Valley follow on directly from the area policies in the Core Strategy. The areas have different characters and roles within the various parts of the valley and are described as sub areas below. The Core Strategy policies have been developed to meet the needs of each particular area of the Lower Don in the context of the citywide spatial vision. The policy area designation and sites allocation proposed within each sub-area are intended to help deliver the related Core Strategy policy. 1.22 The policy area designations and allocation of sites in the South East Urban Area reflect the extensive priority areas for the release of new housing land, and an 4 Core Strategy Figure 5.1, page 30 5 Core Strategy, paragraph 4.2 - 4 - emphasis on area regeneration. This aims to encourage the revival of the housing market in parts of Sheffield where markets have been poor or non- existent, and the improvement of neighbourhoods to create successful attractive places to live. This is set out in the Core Strategy as the spatial vision for the South East Urban Area6 . SUB AREAS Lower Don Valley 1.23 In the Lower Don Valley five sub areas are identified. The areas are Meadowhall (CS77), Tinsley Park (CS88), Attercliffe/Newhall, Parkway/Kettlebridge (both CS99), and Attercliffe/Darnall (CS21, CS28, and CS3510).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leisure and Library Trusts
    Leisure and library trusts ~ Researched and written by UNIloN_ Centre for Public Services Local Government Summary of key issues 2 Contents Glossary of terms 4 Introduction 5 Part 1: The trust model 7 Legal and organisational options Representation on the board Ownership of leisure facilities Provision of support services Council controls Community and social welfare objectives Part 2: Reasons for promoting leisure and library trusts 11 Leisure services trusts Library trusts Inclusion of other services The leisure trust experience Use of consultants Part 3: Reasons why councils rejected trusts 20 Reasons for rejecting leisure trusts Reasons for rejecting library trusts Part 4: Employment impact 24 Staff TUPE transfers Impact of transfer on jobs, terms and conditions Staff will have limited protection from TUPE Responsibility for employment policies Impact on trade union organisation Part 5: Guidelines for branches 27 Lessons learnt from campaigns Deciding strategies and tactics Trade union demands Wider issues Appendices Appendix 1: Financial assessment 30 Source of savings Doubts over continuation of savings Additional costs Economies of scale Income generation Access to capital Trusts and the Private Finance Initiative Appendix 2: Accountability and management issues 36 Corporate issues Accountability and loss of control Implementing corporate policies Possible loss of support services Economic viability as independent organisation •Evaluation process Achieving service improvements User and community involvement Best Value will apply to trusts Alternative organisational models The advantages of in-house services References 41 • Summary of key issues • An increasing number of local authorities are discussing transfer of leisure services to trusts. Twenty-one authorities have already established leisure trusts and a further 20 are either in the process of setting up trusts or are currently considering proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield City Council Place
    SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL PLACE REPORT TO CITY CENTRE SOUTH AND EAST PLANNING DATE 03/05/2011 AND HIGHWAYS COMMITTEE REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM SUBJECT APPLICATIONS UNDER VARIOUS ACTS/REGULATIONS SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS SEE RECOMMENDATIONS HEREIN THE BACKGROUND PAPERS ARE IN THE FILES IN RESPECT OF THE PLANNING APPLICATIONS NUMBERED. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS N/A PARAGRAPHS CLEARED BY BACKGROUND PAPERS CONTACT POINT FOR Chris Heeley TEL 0114 2736329 ACCESS Lucy Bond NO: 0114 2734556 AREA(S) AFFECTED CATEGORY OF REPORT OPEN 2 Application No. Location Page No. 11/00821/FUL 271 Chesterfield Road Sheffield 6 S8 0RT 11/00812/CHU Players Sports Bar 125 West Street 12 City Centre Sheffield S1 4ER 11/00696/RG3 Land At South Side Of Road Between Train Tracks And River Rother 26 Station Road Halfway Sheffield 11/00596/FUL Curtilage Of 36 High Street Beighton 36 Sheffield S20 1EA 11/00588/CHU 26 - 30 Division Street Sheffield 47 S1 4GF 11/00557/FUL Wellington House 39 Wellington Street 57 Sheffield S1 4HF 11/00503/FUL 7 Rockingham Street Sheffield 73 S1 4EA 11/00427/FUL 30 Bellhouse Road Sheffield 87 S5 6HL 3 11/00394/FUL Plot V Europa View 95 Sheffield Business Park Phase I Sheffield 11/00389/FUL Prego Unit 7 103 The Plaza 8 Fitzwilliam Street Sheffield S1 4JB 11/00246/REM Land Between Lock Lane And 303 Sheffield Road 114 Tinsley Sheffield S9 2FY 11/00223/FUL Kelham Island Museum To Brooklyn Works Green Lane 124 Sheffield S3 8RY 10/04045/FUL Site Of 159 To 165 West Street 138 City Centre Sheffield S1 4EW 10/03699/RG3 Land Off Meadowhall
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Neighbourhoods Scrutiny and Policy
    SUCCESSFUL NEIGHBOURHOODS 9th July 2009 SCRUTINY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Closed Circuit Television 1. Introduction 1.1 This report presents to the Successful Neighbourhoods Scrutiny and Development Board with information to support discussions on: • The degree to which CCTV is situated on public and private land • The legal powers available to use CCTV in different scenario’s • The way in which the South Yorkshire Police and the City Council supervise CCTV’s use • The degree to which such systems have proved to be useful in deterring and detecting crime and anti-social behaviour • Ethics and civil liberty issues which restrain the use of CCTV on public and private land 1.2 This information is provided in respect of the City Council’s CCTV monitoring station only. 2. Background 2.1 The City Councils CCTV monitoring station receives images from 136 cameras situated around Sheffield City Centre and a number of inner City locations. The equipment is linked by fibre optic network and images are shared with the SWISS (Sheffield Wide Imaging Switching System) partners. Partners include South Yorkshire Police, Meadowhall, Supertram and Urban Traffic Control. The station also monitors a range of audio feeds including Pubwatch, CCRAC (City Centre Retailers against Crime) and Airwaves (Police Communications System). 2.2 The Monitoring Station also monitors Bus Lane traffic in the Wicker and Hillsborough areas and provides images recording contraventions to Urban Traffic Control. 3. The degree to which CCTV is situated on public and private land 3.1 Attached at Appendix A is list of camera’s and their locations within the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield City Council
    FORM 2 SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Cabinet Report Report of: The Chief Executive and Executive Director, Resources ________________________________________________________________ Report to: Cabinet ________________________________________________________________ Date: 17 February 2016 ________________________________________________________________ Subject: Revenue Budget for 2016/17 ________________________________________________________________ Author of Report: Eugene Walker, Acting Executive Director of Resources ________________________________________________________________ Key Decision: YES ________________________________________________________________ Reason Key Decision: Expenditure/savings over £500,000 Affects 2 or more wards ________________________________________________________________ Summary: The City Council on 4 March 2016 meets to consider the Revenue Budget for 2016/17 and to determine the Council Tax for that year The report provides information to enable the Council to set a budget and determine the Council Tax. The proposals set out in this report provide for a balanced budget to be recommended to Council. ________________________________________________________________ Reasons for Recommendations: Please see above Form 2 – Executive Report Page 105 January 2014 _____________________________________________________________ Recommendations: The report contains recommendations to Council on 4 March 2016 _____________________________________________________________ Background Papers: Category of Report: OPEN If CLOSED
    [Show full text]
  • SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Cabinet Report 8
    SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Cabinet Report 8 Report of: Simon Green Executive Director Place ______________________________________________________________ Date: 23 March 2011 ______________________________________________________________ Subject: Attercliffe Action Plan ______________________________________________________________ Author of Report: John Bownes ______________________________________________________________ Summary: Attercliffe lies at the heart of the Lower Don Valley and is a mixture of local shopping centre, manufacturing and a growing residential population. It performs an important function locally and sub regionally but is generally under performing. The Attercliffe Action Plan outlines a series of interventions which together will ensure the area thrives and prospers and fulfils its full potential to the benefit of local people, local firms and visitors to the centre and leisure facilities nearby. This report summarises the proposals in the draft Action Plan, how it will be delivered and the implications that will arise. ______________________________________________________________ Reasons for Recommendations: The recommendation will enable officers to pursue the delivery of projects and proposals contained in the draft Attercliffe Action Plan and for Members to monitor and review the plan at regular intervals Recommendations: It is recommended that Cabinet: a) endorses the objectives, strategy, projects and other interventions contained within the action plan to secure a vital and sustainable future for Attercliffe;
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SHEFFIELD CITY TRUST Management Report Relating To
    SHEFFIELD CITY TRUST Management Report relating to, and deemed to be part of, the annual financial report of Sheffield City Trust (the “charity”) for the year ended 31 March 2017 REPORT The trustees, who act as directors for the purpose of company law, present their management report for the period ended 31 March 2017. Purpose of the charity The objects of the charity are as detailed in the charity’s governing document, its Memorandum of Association. 1 An object of the charity is to promote the benefit of the inhabitants of South Yorkshire and surrounding counties by the provision of facilities for recreation and leisure time occupation in the interest of social welfare. The charity has continued in its policies of providing recreational and other leisure facilities of a high standard and as economically as possible. The charity seeks to encourage high levels of use by the community with policies that encourage wide public access. There has been no material change in these policies over the relevant period. 2 A further object of the charity is to promote and preserve good physical and mental health. The objective is pursued by encouraging high levels of use of recreational and leisure facilities by the community. In addition, the charity has a policy of carrying out ad hoc initiatives and giving financial support to appropriate projects which has been continued during the period. 3 Further objects of the charity include the encouragement of the arts and the acquisition, preservation, restoration and maintenance of buildings of historic
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Waterside Court, Bold Street Sheffield S9 2LR
    3 Waterside Court, Bold Street Sheffield S9 2LR 8,290 Sq Ft (4,150 Sq Ft Vacant) High quality, modern office space Excellent transport links and amenities Part vacant, part income producing close by Ideal for an owner occupier FOR SALE PART LET MODERN OFFICE INVESTMENT St James House, Vicar Lane, Sheffield, S1 2EX LOCATION The property is located on the west side of Bold Street, The ground floor is let therefore the property would be accessed off Hawke Street and Attercliffe Common, in the ideally suited to an owner occupier who would look to heart of the Lower Don Valley area of Sheffield. occupy the first floor and benefit from the income on the ground floor. There is easy access to the M1 Motorway, approximately one mile to the north east, and Sheffield City Centre PRICE approximately one and a half miles to the south west. On Application. Public transport links are excellent with both the Arena and ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE (EPC) Valley Centertainment Tram Stops being located The property has an EPC rating 'C'. Certificate available on approximately 400 metres away as well as there being request. access to numerous bus routes. RATING Amenities for staff are very good with a number of leisure Both floors are rated as 'Offices and Premises' with a 2017 services close by, most notably Valley Centertainment. Rateable Value of £36,500. Meadowhall Shopping Centre and Train Station are also easily accessible. ACCOMMODATION AND TENANCY DESCRIPTION Ground Floor 4,140 Sq Ft The available space comprises of 4,150 sq ft of space on First Floor 4,150 Sq Ft the first floor of a two storey, modern, pavilion style office.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study : Tinsley Viaduct Scope of Work
    CASE STUDY : TINSLEY VIADUCT PROJECT INTRODUCTION Tinsley viaduct is a two-tier steel box girder viaduct which opened in 1968 as a key structure on the M1 motorway near Sheffield in Yorkshire. The M1 is one of the UK’s main motorway arteries and a key economic link between the north and south of England. The upper deck of the viaduct serves the M1 and the lower deck serves the A631 which is part of the strategic road network around Sheffield. The maintenance of Tinsley Viaduct is the responsibility of Highways England and sits in Area 12 where A- one+, a joint venture between Costain, Colas and Jacobs, has the maintenance framework contract. A key project within the maintenance programme in 2019 was the repair and resurfacing of both lanes of the A631. As one of the UK’s leading road infrastructure repair specialists, Metrail Construction Ltd was selected by A-one+ to carry out the bridge deck waterproofing and associated concrete repairs on the south bound carriageway. SCOPE OF WORK The contract awarded to Metrail covered the following scope of work on a total of 18,000sq m of deck and 1850sq m of walkway: • Remove existing waterproofing • Remove existing walkway surfacing • Scrape the main deck to remove any remaining surfacing and waterproofing • Identify and carry out concrete repairs prior to waterproofing • Apply waterproofing, including bond coat, with a proprietary waterproofing system • Apply combined waterproofing/high friction surfacing on the walkway. HEAD OFFICE : UNIT 13 STATION ROAD INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, HAILSHAM, EAST SUSSEX, BN27 2EY T: 01825 761360 REGIONAL OFFICE : BIG PICTURE HOUSE, PONTEFRACT ROAD, SNAITH, DN14 0DE T: 01405 808230 1 SCOTLAND OFFICE : MAXIM BUSINESS PARK, MAXIM 1 - 1ST FLOOR, 2 PARKLANDS WAY, MOTHERWELL, ML1 4WR T: 01417 397510 CASE STUDY : TINSLEY VIADUCT PROGRAMME The works required a traffic management scheme to be put in place to enable two-way traffic on the north bound carriageway which then allowed a full closure of the south bound carriageway.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham Sheffield
    S T E A D L To Penistone AN S NE H E LA E L E F I RR F 67 N Rainborough Park N O A A C F T E L R To Barnsley and I H 61 E N G W A L A E W D Doncaster A L W N ELL E I HILL ROAD T E L S D A T E E M R N W A R Y E O 67 O G O 1 L E O A R A L D M B N U E A D N E E R O E O Y N TH L I A A C N E A Tankersley N L L W T G N A P E O F A L L A A LA E N LA AL 6 T R N H C 16 FI S 6 E R N K Swinton W KL D 1 E BER A E T King’s Wood O M O 3 D O C O A 5 A H I S 67 OA A W R Ath-Upon-Dearne Y R T T W N R S E E E RR E W M Golf Course T LANE A CA 61 D A 6 A O CR L R R B E O E D O S A N A A S A O M L B R D AN E E L GREA Tankersley Park A CH AN AN A V R B ES L S E E D D TER L LDS N S R L E R R A R Y I E R L Golf Course O N O IE O 6 F O E W O O E 61 T A A F A L A A N K R D H E S E N L G P A R HA U L L E WT F AN B HOR O I E O E Y N S Y O E A L L H A L D E D VE 6 S N H 1 I L B O H H A UE W 6 S A BR O T O E H Finkle Street OK R L C EE F T O LA AN H N F E E L I E A L E A L N H I L D E O F Westwood Y THE River Don D K A E U A6 D H B 16 X ROA ILL AR S Y MANCHES Country Park ARLE RO E TE H W MO R O L WO R A N R E RT RT R H LA N E O CO Swinton Common N W A 1 N Junction 35a D E R D R O E M O A L DR AD O 6 L N A CL AN IV A A IN AYFIELD E OOBE E A A L L H R D A D S 67 NE LANE VI L E S CT L V D T O I H A L R R A E H YW E E I O N R E Kilnhurst A W O LI B I T D L E G G LANE A H O R D F R N O 6 R A O E N I O 2 Y Harley A 9 O Hood Hill ROAD K N E D D H W O R RTH Stocksbridge L C A O O TW R N A Plantation L WE R B O N H E U Y Wentworth A H L D H L C E L W A R E G O R L N E N A
    [Show full text]
  • Green Routes - November 2015 Finkle Street Old Denaby Bromley Hoober Bank
    Langsett Reservoir Newhill Bow Broom Hingcliff Hill Pilley Green Tankersley Elsecar Roman Terrace Upper Midhope Upper Tankersley SWINTON Underbank Reservoir Midhopestones Green Moor Wortley Lea Brook Swinton Bridge Midhope Reservoir Hunshelf Bank Smithy Moor Green Routes - November 2015 Finkle Street Old Denaby Bromley Hoober Bank Gosling Spring Street Horner House Low Harley Barrow Midhope Moors Piccadilly Barnside Moor Wood Willows Howbrook Harley Knoll Top Cortworth Fenny Common Ings Stocksbridge Hoober Kilnhurst Thorncliffe Park Sugden Clough Spink Hall Wood Royd Wentworth Warren Hood Hill High Green Bracken Moor Howbrook Reservoir Potter Hill East Whitwell Carr Head Whitwell Moor Hollin Busk Sandhill Royd Hooton Roberts Nether Haugh ¯ River Don Calf Carr Allman Well Hill Lane End Bolsterstone Ryecroft Charltonbrook Hesley Wood Dog Kennel Pond Bitholmes Wood B Ewden Village Morley Pond Burncross CHAPELTOWN White Carr la Broomhead Reservoir More Hall Reservoir U c Thorpe Hesley Wharncliffe Chase k p Thrybergh Wigtwizzle b Scholes p Thorpe Common Greasbrough Oaken Clough Wood Seats u e Wingfield Smithy Wood r Brighthorlmlee Wharncliffe Side n Greno Wood Whitley Keppel's Column Parkgate Aldwarke Grenoside V D Redmires Wood a Kimberworth Park Smallfield l o The Wheel l Dropping Well Northfield Dalton Foldrings e n Ecclesfield y Grange Lane Dalton Parva Oughtibridge St Ann's Eastwood Ockley Bottom Oughtibridg e Kimberworth Onesacr e Thorn Hill East Dene Agden Dalton Magna Coldwell Masbrough V Bradgate East Herringthorpe Nether Hey Shiregreen
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted March 2009
    6088 Core Strategy Cover:A4 Cover & Back Spread 6/3/09 16:04 Page 1 Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted March 2009 Sheffield Core Strategy Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted by the City Council on 4th March 2009 Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Sheffield City Council Sheffield Core Strategy Core Strategy Availability of this document This document is available on the Council’s website at www.sheffield.gov.uk/sdf If you would like a copy of this document in large print, audio format ,Braille, on computer disk, or in a language other than English,please contact us for this to be arranged: l telephone (0114) 205 3075, or l e-mail [email protected], or l write to: SDF Team Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Sheffield Core Strategy INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 Introduction to the Core Strategy 1 What is the Sheffield Development Framework about? 1 What is the Core Strategy? 1 PART 1: CONTEXT, VISION, OBJECTIVES AND SPATIAL STRATEGY Chapter 2 Context and Challenges 5 Sheffield: the story so far 5 Challenges for the Future 6 Other Strategies 9 Chapter 3 Vision and Objectives 13 The Spatial Vision 13 SDF Objectives 14 Chapter 4 Spatial Strategy 23 Introduction 23 Spatial Strategy 23 Overall Settlement Pattern 24 The City Centre 24 The Lower and Upper Don Valley 25 Other Employment Areas in the Main Urban Area 26 Housing Areas 26 Outer Areas 27 Green Corridors and Countryside 27 Transport Routes 28 PART
    [Show full text]
  • South Yorkshire
    INDUSTRIAL HISTORY of SOUTH RKSHI E Association for Industrial Archaeology CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 STEEL 26 10 TEXTILE 2 FARMING, FOOD AND The cementation process 26 Wool 53 DRINK, WOODLANDS Crucible steel 27 Cotton 54 Land drainage 4 Wire 29 Linen weaving 54 Farm Engine houses 4 The 19thC steel revolution 31 Artificial fibres 55 Corn milling 5 Alloy steels 32 Clothing 55 Water Corn Mills 5 Forging and rolling 33 11 OTHER MANUFACTUR- Windmills 6 Magnets 34 ING INDUSTRIES Steam corn mills 6 Don Valley & Sheffield maps 35 Chemicals 56 Other foods 6 South Yorkshire map 36-7 Upholstery 57 Maltings 7 7 ENGINEERING AND Tanning 57 Breweries 7 VEHICLES 38 Paper 57 Snuff 8 Engineering 38 Printing 58 Woodlands and timber 8 Ships and boats 40 12 GAS, ELECTRICITY, 3 COAL 9 Railway vehicles 40 SEWERAGE Coal settlements 14 Road vehicles 41 Gas 59 4 OTHER MINERALS AND 8 CUTLERY AND Electricity 59 MINERAL PRODUCTS 15 SILVERWARE 42 Water 60 Lime 15 Cutlery 42 Sewerage 61 Ruddle 16 Hand forges 42 13 TRANSPORT Bricks 16 Water power 43 Roads 62 Fireclay 16 Workshops 44 Canals 64 Pottery 17 Silverware 45 Tramroads 65 Glass 17 Other products 48 Railways 66 5 IRON 19 Handles and scales 48 Town Trams 68 Iron mining 19 9 EDGE TOOLS Other road transport 68 Foundries 22 Agricultural tools 49 14 MUSEUMS 69 Wrought iron and water power 23 Other Edge Tools and Files 50 Index 70 Further reading 71 USING THIS BOOK South Yorkshire has a long history of industry including water power, iron, steel, engineering, coal, textiles, and glass.
    [Show full text]