DOCSLIB.ORG

Molecular Mechanisms Controlling the Tissue-Specific Activity of the Nutritionally Regulated Promoter I of the Acetyl-Coa Carboxylase-Encoding Gene in Cattle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Molecular Mechanisms Controlling the Tissue-Specific Activity of the Nutritionally Regulated Promoter I of the Acetyl-Coa Carboxylase-Encoding Gene in Cattle Molecular mechanisms controlling the tissue-specific activity of the nutritionally regulated promoter I of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase-encoding gene in cattle Inaugural dissertation for the academic degree Doctor rerum naturalium of Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät Universität Rostock By Xuanming Shi (M. Sc.), born on 17-09-1975, in Anhui, China From Forschungsinstitut für die Biologie landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere in Dummerstorf Rostock (2009) urn:nbn:de:gbv:28-diss2009-0184-9 Dean: Prof. Dr. Hendrik Schubert 1. Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Hans-Martin Seyfert Molecular Biology Research Unit, Research Institute for the Biology of Farm Animals; Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2; D-18196 Dummerstorf; Germany. 2. Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Martin Hagemann Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Life Sciences, University of Rostock; Albert-Einstein-Strasse 3, 18051 Rostock, Germany; 3. Reviewer: PD. Dr. Monika Schweigel Research Institute for the Biology of Farm Animals (FBN), Department of Nutritional Physiology “Oskar Kellner,” Wilhelm-Stahl-Alee 2, D-18196 Dummerstorf, Germany. Date of defense: 19-Oct-2009 Dedicated to my family Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Fat metabolism and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) ............................................................... 1 1.1.1 Fat deposition and mobilization ....................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Biosynthesis of fatty acids and ACC................................................................................ 1 1.1.3 Roles of ACC in fatty acid synthesis and oxidation......................................................... 2 1.1.4 Functional domains of the ACC- ................................................................................... 3 1.2 Regulation of ACC-............................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Long-term regulation........................................................................................................ 4 1.2.1.1 Multi-promoters regulate ACC- transcription initiation......................................... 5 1.2.1.2 Pre-mRNA splicing................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1.3 Stability of mRNA.................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Short-term regulation ....................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2.1 Allosteric regulation ................................................................................................. 8 1.2.2.2 Reversible phosphorylation ...................................................................................... 9 1.3 PI is regulated by a bipartite repressor................................................................................... 10 1.4 Transcription factors relevant to regulating ACC- PI activity ..............................................11 1.4.1 Roles of CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein (C/EBP) ....................................................11 1.4.2 Roles of Nuclear Factor-Y (NF-Y)................................................................................. 14 1.5 Goals of this study ................................................................................................................. 14 2 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 Materials ................................................................................................................................ 17 2.1.1 Bacterial strains .............................................................................................................. 17 2.1.2 Reagents and antibodies ................................................................................................. 17 2.1.3 Plasmid vectors............................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Preparation of DNA ............................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Mini-preparation of plasmid DNA ................................................................................. 19 2.2.2 Midi-preparation of plasmid DNA ................................................................................. 20 2.2.3 Preparation of genomic DNA......................................................................................... 21 2.2.4 Preparation of BAC DNA .............................................................................................. 21 2.3 Preparation of RNA ............................................................................................................... 22 2.3.1 Preparation of RNA from cells and tissues..................................................................... 22 2.3.2 Electrophoresis of RNA through agarose gels containing formaldehyde....................... 23 2.4 Cloning of DNA..................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.1 Digestion by restriction enzyme..................................................................................... 23 2.4.2 Detection of DNA in Agarose Gels ................................................................................ 24 2.4.3 Purification of DNA fragment from gel ......................................................................... 24 2.4.4 Blunting with Klenow enzyme....................................................................................... 24 2.4.5 Ligation .......................................................................................................................... 25 2.4.6 Transformation of DNA into E. coli............................................................................... 25 2.4.7 Screening of the recombinant clones.............................................................................. 26 2.5 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) ........................................................................................ 27 2.5.1 Primer design.................................................................................................................. 28 2.5.2 Standard PCR ................................................................................................................. 28 2.5.3 High-fidelity PCR........................................................................................................... 28 2.5.4 GC-rich PCR .................................................................................................................. 29 I Table of contents 2.5.5 Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) ............................................................................ 29 2.5.6 Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) .................................................................. 30 2.5.7 Genomic Walking........................................................................................................... 31 2.5.8 PCR- mediated site-directed mutagenesis...................................................................... 32 2.5.9 Quantitative Real-Time PCR.......................................................................................... 33 2.6 Cell culture and transfection .................................................................................................. 34 2.6.1 Cell line .......................................................................................................................... 34 2.6.2 Transient transfection ..................................................................................................... 34 2.6.3 Luciferase activity assays............................................................................................... 35 2.7 Preparation and purification of antigen and antibodies.......................................................... 35 2.7.1 Protein expression and preparation (for inclusion bodies) ............................................. 35 2.7.2 Affinity purification via Ni-NTA sepharose................................................................... 36 2.7.3 Measurement of protein concentration........................................................................... 37 2.7.4 SDS-PAGE electrophoresis............................................................................................ 37 2.7.5 Antigen preparation........................................................................................................ 37 2.7.6 Immunization ................................................................................................................. 38 2.7.7 Antibody purification ..................................................................................................... 39 2.8 Immunological methods......................................................................................................... 40 2.8.1 Western blot....................................................................................................................40 2.8.2 Protein-protein interaction by immunoprecipitation ...................................................... 41 2.8.3 Indirect sandwich ELISA for bovine ACC- ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case Report Clinical Report of a 17Q12 Microdeletion with Additionally Unreported Clinical Features
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Genetics Volume 2014, Article ID 264947, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/264947 Case Report Clinical Report of a 17q12 Microdeletion with Additionally Unreported Clinical Features Jennifer L. Roberts,1 Stephanie K. Gandomi,2 Melissa Parra,2 Ira Lu,2 Chia-Ling Gau,2 Majed Dasouki,1,3 and Merlin G. Butler1 1 The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA 2 Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA 3 King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia Correspondence should be addressed to Stephanie K. Gandomi; [email protected] Received 18 March 2014; Revised 13 May 2014; Accepted 14 May 2014; Published 2 June 2014 Academic Editor: Philip D. Cotter Copyright © 2014 Jennifer L. Roberts et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copy number variations involving the 17q12 region have been associated with developmental and speech delay, autism, aggression, self-injury, biting and hitting, oppositional defiance, inappropriate language, and auditory hallucinations. We present a tall- appearing 17-year-old boy with marfanoid habitus, hypermobile joints, mild scoliosis, pectus deformity, widely spaced nipples, pes cavus, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and psychiatric manifestations including physical and verbal aggression, obsessive-compulsive behaviors, and oppositional defiance. An echocardiogram showed borderline increased aortic root size. An abdominal ultrasound revealed a small pancreas, mild splenomegaly with a 1.3 cm accessory splenule, and normal kidneys and liver.
    [Show full text]
  • Both Sense and Antisense Strands of the LTR of the Schistosoma Mansoni Pao-Like Retrotransposon Sinbad Drive Luciferase Expression
    Mol Genet Genomics DOI 10.1007/s00438-006-0181-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Both sense and antisense strands of the LTR of the Schistosoma mansoni Pao-like retrotransposon Sinbad drive luciferase expression Claudia S. Copeland · Victoria H. Mann · Paul J. Brindley Received: 20 August 2006 / Accepted: 4 October 2006 © Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotranspo- activity in HeLa cells. The ability of the Sinbad LTR to sons, mobile genetic elements comprising substantial transcribe in both its forward and inverted orientation proportions of many eukaryotic genomes, are so represents one of few documented examples of bidirec- named for the presence of LTRs, direct repeats about tional promotor function. 250–600 bp in length Xanking the open reading frames that encode the retrotransposon enzymes and struc- Keywords Schistosome · Boudicca · Promotor · tural proteins. LTRs include promotor functions as Promoter · Bidirectional · Inverse well as other roles in retrotransposition. LTR retro- transposons, including the Gypsy-like Boudicca and the Pao/BEL-like Sinbad elements, comprise a sub- Introduction stantial proportion of the genome of the human blood Xuke, Schistosoma mansoni. In order to deduce the Eukaryotic genomes generally contain substantial capability of speciWc copies of Boudicca and Sinbad amounts of repetitive sequences, many of which repre- LTRs to function as promotors, these LTRs were sent mobile genetic elements (e.g., Lander et al. 2001; investigated analytically and experimentally. Sequence Holt et al. 2002). These mobile elements have played analysis revealed the presence of TATA boxes, canoni- fundamental roles in host genome evolution (Charles- cal polyadenylation signals, and direct inverted repeats worth et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Selection Algorithms in Generalized Linear Models
    VARIABLE SELECTION ALGORITHMS IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS Juan Carlos Laria de la Cruz A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Mathematical Engineering) Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Advisors Rosa E. Lillo M. Carmen Aguilera-Morillo Tutor Rosa E. Lillo June, 2020 Variable selection algorithms in generalized linear models A DISSERTATION June, 2020 By Juan Carlos Laria de la Cruz Published by: UC3M, Department of Statistics, Av. Universidad 30, 28912 Leganés, Madrid Spain www.uc3m.es This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – Non Derivatives A mi madre Acknowledgements None of this work would have been possible without the continuous support, expert advice, motivation, constant dedication, and commit- ment of my thesis advisors and friends, Professors Rosa Lillo and Car- men Aguilera. I am deeply grateful to them. I would also like to thank my coauthors, and coworkers at the Depart- ment of Statistics. Many people have given me relevant suggestions and insights at different points during these years. Me being here has required so much patience and sacrifice by those involved in my education, that this work is theirs too. Not only my grandmother and my parents but also my school and university teach- ers authored this thesis. Special thanks to my family and my friends, who were always there for me, unconditionally, when I needed them. Contents published and presented The materials from the following sources are included in the thesis. Their inclusion is not indicated by typographical means or references, since they are fully embedded in each chapter indicated below.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Analysis of Rice Bidirectional Promoters
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2012 Functional analysis of rice bidirectional promoters Surendar R. Dhadi Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Biology Commons Copyright 2012 Surendar R. Dhadi Recommended Citation Dhadi, Surendar R., "Functional analysis of rice bidirectional promoters", Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2012. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/191 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Biology Commons FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RICE BIDIRECTIONAL PROMOTERS By Surendar R Dhadi A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Biological Sciences) MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2012 Copyright © Surendar R Dhadi 2012 This dissertation, “Functional Analysis of Rice Bidirectional Promoters”, is hereby approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. Department of Biological Sciences Signatures: Dissertation Advisor ________________________________________ Ramakrishna Wusirika Department Chair ________________________________________ K. Michael Gibson Date ________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Tissue Transcriptomic Study Reveals the Main Role of Liver in the Chicken Adaptive Response to a Switch in Dietary Energy
    Desert et al. BMC Genomics (2018) 19:187 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4520-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Multi-tissue transcriptomic study reveals the main role of liver in the chicken adaptive response to a switch in dietary energy source through the transcriptional regulation of lipogenesis C. Desert1*†, E. Baéza2†, M. Aite1, M. Boutin1, A. Le Cam3, J. Montfort3, M. Houee-Bigot4, Y. Blum1,5, P. F. Roux1,6, C. Hennequet-Antier2, C. Berri2, S. Metayer-Coustard2, A. Collin2, S. Allais1, E. Le Bihan2, D. Causeur4, F. Gondret1, M. J. Duclos2 and S. Lagarrigue1* Abstract Background: Because the cost of cereals is unstable and represents a large part of production charges for meat- type chicken, there is an urge to formulate alternative diets from more cost-effective feedstuff. We have recently shown that meat-type chicken source is prone to adapt to dietary starch substitution with fat and fiber. The aim of this study was to better understand the molecular mechanisms of this adaptation to changes in dietary energy sources through the fine characterization of transcriptomic changes occurring in three major metabolic tissues – liver, adipose tissue and muscle – as well as in circulating blood cells. Results: We revealed the fine-tuned regulation of many hepatic genes encoding key enzymes driving glycogenesis and de novo fatty acid synthesis pathways and of some genes participating in oxidation. Among the genes expressed upon consumption of a high-fat, high-fiber diet, we highlighted CPT1A, which encodes a key enzyme in the regulation of fatty acid oxidation. Conversely, the repression of lipogenic genes by the high-fat diet was clearly associated with the down- regulation of SREBF1 transcripts but was not associated with the transcript regulation of MLXIPL and NR1H3, which are both transcription factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Novel Chromosomal Rearrangements in Acute
    Leukemia (1999) 13, 1534–1538 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0887-6924/99 $15.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/leu Identification of novel chromosomal rearrangements in acute myelogenous leukemia involving loci on chromosome 2p23, 15q22 and 17q21 A Melnick1, S Fruchtman1, A Zelent2, M Liu3, Q Huang3, B Boczkowska1, MJ Calasanz4, A Fernandez4, JD Licht5 and V Najfeld1 1Division of Hematology, Tumor Cytogenetics Laboratory, and 5Derald H Ruttenberg Cancer Center, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 2Institute of Cancer Research London, UK; 4University of Navarra and Hospital San Milagros, Spain; and 3Shanghai Institute of Hematology, China Chromosomal translocations are frequently linked to multiple Case reports hematological malignancies. The study of the resulting abnor- mal gene products has led to fundamental advances in the understanding of cancer biology. This is the first report of Patient 1 t(2;15)(p23;q22) and t(2;17)(p23;q21) translocations in human malignancy. Patient 1, a 73-year-old male, was diagnosed with A previously healthy 73-year-old male, presented in June myeloblastic (FAB M1 sub-type) AML. Cytogenetic analysis showed a 47,XY,t(2;15)(p23;q22),+13 karyotype. Fluorescent in 1996 with acute myeloblastic leukemia (FAB M1 sub-type). situ hybridization (FISH) showed that the PML gene was trans- The patient was treated with standard induction chemo- ferred intact to the short arm of chromosome 2 while the ALK therapy consisting of cytosine arabinoside and idarubicin and gene on chromosome 2p23 was passively transferred to the achieved complete remission. He subsequently underwent long arm of chromosome 15.
    [Show full text]
  • View, USA) with the Gene Specific Primers GSPH2 for HAND2 and GSPD1 for DEIN
    BMC Molecular Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Co-regulated expression of HAND2 and DEIN by a bidirectional promoter with asymmetrical activity in neuroblastoma Harald Voth1,2, André Oberthuer1, Thorsten Simon1, Yvonne Kahlert1, Frank Berthold1 and Matthias Fischer*1 Address: 1Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology and Center of Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University Children's Hospital, Cologne, Germany and 2Department of Dermatology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany Email: Harald Voth - [email protected]; André Oberthuer - [email protected]; Thorsten Simon - [email protected]; Yvonne Kahlert - [email protected]; Frank Berthold - [email protected]; Matthias Fischer* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 6 April 2009 Received: 12 November 2008 Accepted: 6 April 2009 BMC Molecular Biology 2009, 10:28 doi:10.1186/1471-2199-10-28 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2199/10/28 © 2009 Voth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: HAND2, a key regulator for the development of the sympathetic nervous system, is located on chromosome 4q33 in a head-to-head orientation with DEIN, a recently identified novel gene with stage specific expression in primary neuroblastoma (NB). Both genes are expressed in primary NB as well as most NB cell lines and are separated by a genomic sequence of 228 bp.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Are the Most Frequent Cause of Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young Type 5
    Original Article Large Genomic Rearrangements in the Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-1␤ (TCF2) Gene Are the Most Frequent Cause of Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young Type 5 Christine Bellanne´-Chantelot,1 Se´verine Clauin,1 Dominique Chauveau,2 Philippe Collin,3 Miche`le Daumont,4 Claire Douillard,5 Danie`le Dubois-Laforgue,6 Laurent Dusselier,7 Jean-Franc¸ois Gautier,8 Michel Jadoul,9 Marie Laloi-Michelin,10 Laetitia Jacquesson,11 Etienne Larger,12 Jacques Louis,7 Marc Nicolino,13 Jean-Franc¸ois Subra,14 Jean-Marie Wilhem,15 Jacques Young,16 Gilberto Velho,17 and Jose´ Timsit6 Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) 5 is caused than previously reported, with one-third of the cases re- by mutations in the TCF2 gene encoding the transcription sulting from large deletions of TCF2. Because QMPSF is factor hepatocyte nuclear factor-1␤. However, in 60% of more rapid and cost effective than sequencing, we propose the patients with a phenotype suggesting MODY5, no point that patients whose phenotype is consistent with MODY5 mutation is detected in TCF2. We have hypothesized that should be screened first with the QMPSF assay. In addition, large genomic rearrangements of TCF2 that are missed by other MODY genes should be screened for large genomic conventional screening methods may account for this ob- rearrangements. Diabetes 54:3126–3132, 2005 servation. In 40 unrelated patients presenting with MODY5 phenotype, TCF2 was screened for mutations by sequenc- ing. Patients without mutations were then screened for aturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is TCF2 rearrangements by the quantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments (QMPSF).
    [Show full text]
  • Distinct Transcriptomes Define Rostral and Caudal 5Ht Neurons
    DISTINCT TRANSCRIPTOMES DEFINE ROSTRAL AND CAUDAL 5HT NEURONS by CHRISTI JANE WYLIE Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Evan S. Deneris Department of Neurosciences CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2010 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of ______________________________________________________ candidate for the ________________________________degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ........................................................................ v ABSTRACT ..........................................................................................................vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 I. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5HT) ....................................................... 1 A. Discovery..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbit Anti-TADA3L/FITC Conjugated Antibody-SL12893R-FITC
    SunLong Biotech Co.,LTD Tel: 0086-571- 56623320 Fax:0086-571- 56623318 E-mail:[email protected] www.sunlongbiotech.com Rabbit Anti-TADA3L/FITC Conjugated antibody SL12893R-FITC Product Name: Anti-TADA3L/FITC Chinese Name: FITC标记的TADA3L蛋白抗体 ADA3; ADA3 homolog; ADA3-like protein; FLJ20221; FLJ21329; hADA3; Alias: Transcriptional adaptor 3 (NGG1 homolog yeast) like; Transcriptional adaptor 3 like. Organism Species: Rabbit Clonality: Polyclonal React Species: Human,Mouse,Rat,Dog,Pig,Cow,Horse,Rabbit,Sheep, ICC=1:50-200IF=1:50-200 Applications: not yet tested in other applications. optimal dilutions/concentrations should be determined by the end user. Molecular weight: 49kDa Form: Lyophilized or Liquid Concentration: 2mg/1ml immunogen: KLH conjugated synthetic peptide derived from human TADA3L Lsotype: IgG Purification: affinity purified by Protein A Storage Buffer: 0.01M TBS(pH7.4) with 1% BSA, 0.03% Proclin300 and 50% Glycerol. Storewww.sunlongbiotech.com at -20 °C for one year. Avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles. The lyophilized antibody is stable at room temperature for at least one month and for greater than a year Storage: when kept at -20°C. When reconstituted in sterile pH 7.4 0.01M PBS or diluent of antibody the antibody is stable for at least two weeks at 2-4 °C. background: DNA-binding transcriptional activator proteins increase the rate of transcription by interacting with the transcriptional machinery bound to the basal promoter in conjunction with adaptor proteins, possibly by acetylation and destabilization of Product Detail: nucleosomes. The protein encoded by this gene is a transcriptional activator adaptor and a component of the histone acetyl transferase (HAT) coactivator complex which plays a crucial role in chromatin modulation and cell cycle progression.
    [Show full text]
  • Strain Differences in Stress Responsivity Are Associated with Divergent Amygdala Gene Expression and Glutamate-Mediated Neuron
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science Animal Science Department 2010 Strain Differences in Stress Responsivity Are Associated with Divergent Amygdala Gene Expression and Glutamate-Mediated Neuronal Excitability Khyobeni Mozhui University of Tennessee Health Science Center Rose-Marie Karlsson National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health Thomas L. Kash Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Jessica Ihne National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health Maxine Norcross National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/animalscifacpub Part of the Genetics and Genomics Commons, and the Meat Science Commons Mozhui, Khyobeni; Karlsson, Rose-Marie; Kash, Thomas L.; Ihne, Jessica; Norcross, Maxine; Patel, Sachin; Farrell, Mollee R.; Hill, Elizabeth E.; Graybeal, Carolyn; Martin, Kathryn P.; Camp, Marguerite; Fitzgerald, Paul J.; Ciobanu, Daniel C.; Sprengel, Rolf; Mishina, Masayoshi; Wellman, Cara L.; Winder, Danny G.; WIlliams, Robert W.; and Holmes, Andrew, "Strain Differences in Stress Responsivity Are Associated with Divergent Amygdala Gene Expression and Glutamate-Mediated Neuronal Excitability" (2010). Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science. 899. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/animalscifacpub/899 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal Science Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Khyobeni Mozhui, Rose-Marie Karlsson, Thomas L. Kash, Jessica Ihne, Maxine Norcross, Sachin Patel, Mollee R.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0134629 A1 Link Et Al
    US 2006O134629A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0134629 A1 Link et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 22, 2006 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR Related U.S. Application Data ELUCDATING PROTEN EXPRESSION PROFILES IN CELLS (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 09/811,842, filed on Mar. 19, 2001, now Pat. No. 6,897,020. (76) Inventors: Charles J. Link, West Des Moines, IA (US); Tatiana Seregina, West Des (60) Provisional application No. 60/190,678, filed on Mar. Moines, IA (US); Nicholas N. 20, 2000. Provisional application No. 60/458,152, Vahanian, Ankeny, IA (US); James N. filed on Mar. 27, 2003. Higginbotham, Nashville, TN (US); William Jay Ramsey, Ankeny, IA Publication Classification (US); Bradley J. Powers, Ames, IA (US); Sachet A. Shukla, Ames, IA (51) Int. C. (US); Won Bin Young, Des Moines, IA CI2O I/68 (2006.01) (US); Teresa Dicolandrea, Ames, IA G0IN 33/567 (2006.01) (US); Mario R. Mautino, Ankeny, IA GOIN 33/53 (2006.01) (US) (52) U.S. Cl. .................................................. 435/6; 435/7.2 Correspondence Address: ABSTRACT HOWREY LLP (57) CFO IP DOCKETING DEPARTMENT 2941 FAIRVIEW PARK DR, SUITE 200 The present invention relates generally to methods and compositions for the identification of differential protein FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042-2924 (US) expression patterns and concomitantly the active genetic (21) Appl. No.: 10/660,893 regions that are directly or indirectly involved in different tissue types, disease states, or other cellular differences (22) Filed: Sep. 12, 2003 desirable for diagnosis or for targets for drug therapy.
    [Show full text]