Complete Baronetage of 1720," to Which [Erroneous] Statement Brydges Adds
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
cs CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 1924 092 524 374 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/cletails/cu31924092524374 : Complete JSaronetage. EDITED BY Gr. Xtl. C O- 1^ <»- lA Vi «_ VOLUME I. 1611—1625. EXETER WILLIAM POLLAKD & Co. Ltd., 39 & 40, NORTH STREET. 1900. Vo v2) / .|vt POirARD I S COMPANY^ CONTENTS. FACES. Preface ... ... ... v-xii List of Printed Baronetages, previous to 1900 xiii-xv Abbreviations used in this work ... xvi Account of the grantees and succeeding HOLDERS of THE BARONETCIES OF ENGLAND, CREATED (1611-25) BY JaMES I ... 1-222 Account of the grantees and succeeding holders of the baronetcies of ireland, created (1619-25) by James I ... 223-259 Corrigenda et Addenda ... ... 261-262 Alphabetical Index, shewing the surname and description of each grantee, as above (1611-25), and the surname of each of his successors (being Commoners) in the dignity ... ... 263-271 Prospectus of the work ... ... 272 PREFACE. This work is intended to set forth the entire Baronetage, giving a short account of all holders of the dignity, as also of their wives, with (as far as can be ascertained) the name and description of the parents of both parties. It is arranged on the same principle as The Complete Peerage (eight vols., 8vo., 1884-98), by the same Editor, save that the more convenient form of an alphabetical arrangement has, in this case, had to be abandoned for a chronological one; the former being practically impossible in treating of a dignity in which every holder may (and very many actually do) bear a different name from the grantee. (*) Baronetcies, will, accordingly, be here treated of according to the date of their creation; thus, the reign of James I will be first dealt with and will comprise the Unglish Baronetcies (1611-1625) and the Irish Baronetcies (1619-1625) conferred by that King ; then will follow the reign of Charles I, which will comprise the Unglish, Irish and Scotch (or Nova Scotia) Baronetcies (these last having been first instituted in this reign in 1625) conferred (1625-1649) by that King. See fuller prospectus on p. 272. The date of creation is put within square brackets after each Baronet, inasmuch as the territorial description of a grantee (a description which, in many caseSjC") does not exist) is not, by (*) Besides the cases (more numerous than would be imagined) where the heir, by royal licence, or otherwise, has changed his name, there are many Baronetcies granted with special remainder to famiUes of a different name to cr. that of the grantee, e.g., Foots, 1660, with rem. to Onslow ; Bowtek, cr. cr. 1678 with rem. to Gorinq ; Babkow, 1784, with rem. to Cbawlet- Boevey, etc. of Francis Cottington, cr. (*>) Thus for instance, the description a Bart, by is simply "Secretary to Charles, Prince of I James I, 15 Feb. 1622/3, Wales"; that of Thomas Aylesbury, cr. a Bart, by Charles I, 29 April 1627, is ''one of the Masters of Requests," while, later on, in 1746, William Gooch was cr. a Bart, as "Lieut. Governor of Virginia''; in 1755, Horatio Mann as "Envoy at VI PREFACE. where the grant of a Baronetcy, made hereditary. In a few cases same two Baronetcies of the same name have been created in the date, year, the numerals "1" and "2" are added after such thus, in the case of the two Baronetcies of Molyneux, "[1611(1)]" that year, signifies that it was the first of that name created in- and "[1611(2)] t^at it was the second so created. " The letters " [S.] " and " [I.] put before the date of creation, denote severally that the Baronetcy is one of "Scotland" (or Nova Scotia) or of Ireland. The letters " [E.] " for England, the Court of Florence"; in 1764, George Brydges Rodney as " Vice Admiral"; in 1765, Charles Knowles as "Admiral of the Blue"; in 1766, John Moore as " Admiral of the Red." Thus in a single year, 1813, we have the Baronetcies of Sheaffe, " Major General "; of Duckworth, " Admiral of the Blue "; of Cakes, "Lieut. General"; of Rowley, " Capt, R.N."; of Broke, " Capt. R.N."; and of Hewett, " General in the Army." In the next year, 1814, we have the Baronetcies of Beresford, "Capt. R.N."; of Grey, "Capt. R.N."; of Wylie, "Physician to the Emperor of Russia"; of Blackwood, "Rear Admiral"; of CoUier, "Capt. R.N."; of Hoste, "Capt. R.N." In the next year, 1815, we have those of " " " Hamilton, Lieut. Gen." ; of Campbell, Lieut. Gen." ; of McMahon, Master " of the Rolls in Ireland " ; of Campbell, Lieut. Colonel." In the next year, 1816, those of Ochterlony "Major General"; of Brownrigg, "Lieut. General"; of Ogle, "Admiral of the Red"; of Floyd, "General in the Army," and of Elphinstone, "Lieut. Colonel." In 1660, the territorial description "of London" was given to Gould, Adams, Allen, Humble, Robinson, Brown, Backhouse, " Cutler, Foote, and Gardiner, grantees of Baronetcies ; in like manner, that of Westminster," in 1662, to Long; in 1698, to Germaine; in 1723, to Frederick; etc. In many cases (probably most) the estate by which the grantee is described, has been alienated by one of his successors in the dignity, as, for instance (to go no further than the first Baronetcy), was that " of Redgrave, co. Suffolk," about 1690, by Sir Robert Bacon, the 5th Baronet [1611]. In that family the following curious incident occurred as to the territorial designation " of Gillingham, co. Norfolk," being that of Nicholas Bacon, the grautee of a Baronetcy in 1662. That Baronetcy became extinct in 1685, when the estate of Gilling- ham devolved on the last holder's cousin. Sir Henry Bacon, 3d Bart. [1627], whose ancestor had been cr. u, Bart, in 1627, as "of Mildenhall, co. Suffolk." The estate of Mildenhall, however, had been alienated before 1685, at which date the holder of the Baronetcy of Bacon, which, in 1627, was " of Milden- hall " became (by possession of the estate) " of Gillingham,," though the Baronetcy of Bacon, which, in 1662, was " of GilUngham," was extinct. In 1765, the Baronetcy of Bacon, which, in 1611, was "of Redgrave" (an estate, which had long since been aUenated) devolved on the 8th Baronet of the creation of 1627, and the two Baronetcies (1611 and 1627) became united and continue to be so held by his posterity. PREFACE. Vll " [G.B.] " for Great Britain, and " [U.K.] " for the United Kingdom, are sometimes used (when required for the sake of clearness), but must be understood when absent. The index at the end of each volume will shew the surname of every holder (being a Commoner) of any Baronetcy created during the period treated of therein, while a general index at the end of the work (the incorporation of all these several indexes) will shew the same during the entire period. As to the term " Baronet," it is here used in the same sense as it was by Thomas Fuller in his Worthies, who (under Sir John Darell, Bart., of Berkshire) writes, "We meddle not with ancient Babonets, finding that word promiscuously blended with Banneeets (Sir Ralph Fane in a patent(») passed unto him [by Edward VI in 1550] is expressly termed a Baronet) but insist on their new erection in [1611] the ninth of Eling James. "('') Baronetcies of England were instituted (as above stated) by James I, on 22 May 1611, who also, on 30 Sep. 1619, instituted Baronetcies of Ireland, while Baronetcies of Scotland, or of Nova Scotia, were instituted by Charles I on 26 May 1625. The creation of the last two classes ceased respectively at the date of the Union with Scotland, 1 May 1707, and with Ireland, 1 Jan. 1801. After the first date. Baronetcies of Great Britain took the place of English and Scotch Baronetcies till the last date, since which, all creations are styled Baronetcies of the United Kingdom. Much interesting and original information respecting " the institution and early history of the dignity of Baronet " is given in The Herald amd Genealogist (vol. iii, pp. 193-212, 341-352, 449-458) in an article, so headed, contributed by its learned and (°) In the Oenealogical Magazine (vol. iii, p. 55) this grant (Pat. Roll, 4 Ed. VI) " of the order, state, rank, honour and dignity of a. Baronet," is set out in full. C") Besides Sir Halph Fane, or Vane, above mentioned, whose dignity seems to have been but personal, William de la Pole and his heirs had (according to Sir Robert Cotton, the Antiquary) letters patent of 13 Ed. Ill [1339], conferring on them the dignity of a Baronet in return for a sum of money; a precedent more in accordance with the Baronetcies conferred by James I. " By the statutes of Richard II, every Archbishop, Bishop, Abbot, Prior, Duke, Earl, Baron, Baronet and Knight of the Shire, was commanded to appear in Parliament, according to ancient usage, and in an attaint, under Henry VI, one of the jury challenged himself because his ancestors had been Baronets and Seigneurs des Parlesments." [Debrett's Baronetage, etc., p. zxxiii, edit. 1900]. Viii PREFACE. stated accomplished editor, John Gough Nichols. In this it is himself, his heirs and (p. 346) that though James I engaged "for of successors," that the number of Baronets in the Kingdom England should never exceed 200, and that, though he eventually created 204 (or 205, if Vavasour, a creation of 22 June 1631, with the precedency of 29 June 1611, be reckoned) yet "he did not depart from his bargain, inasmuch as five vacancies had arisen, not by extinction, but by promotion to the peerage, mz.