DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision of the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests Land Management Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision of the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests Land Management Plans Revision of the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests Land Management Plans Draft Biological Evaluation for Sensitive Wildlife, Fish and Invertebrate Species Prepared by: Patricia A. Krueger Regional Threatened and Endangered Species Coordinator for: the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests May 25, 2016 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Draft Biological Evaluation, Wildlife and Fish Forest Plan Revision Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra National Forests Contents Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Current management direction ........................................................................................................ 2 Description of Proposed Action ...................................................................................................... 2 Species of Conservation Concern ............................................................................................... 4 Willow Flycatcher (All Three National Forests) ..................................................................... 5 Great Gray Owl (Sequoia and Sierra National Forests) .......................................................... 5 Sierra Marten (All Three National Forests) ............................................................................. 5 Bats (All Three National Forests) ............................................................................................ 6 Invasive Species .......................................................................................................................... 6 Climate Change ........................................................................................................................... 6 Assumptions ................................................................................................................................ 6 Existing Environment ...................................................................................................................... 6 Sensitive Species that are also Species of Conservation Concern .............................................. 7 Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) .................................................................................. 8 Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) ........................................................................... 14 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) ................................................................................. 21 California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) ...................................................... 27 Great Gray Owl (Strix nebulosa) ........................................................................................... 40 Sierra Marten (Martes caurina) ............................................................................................. 45 Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes necator) ................................................................... 54 Townsend’s Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii) ...................................... 61 Pacific Fringed-tailed Myotis (Myotis thysanodes) ............................................................... 74 Pacific Fisher (Martes pennanti) ........................................................................................... 86 Inyo Mountains Slender Salamander (Batrachoseps campi)............................................... 131 Relictual Slender Salamander (Batrachoseps relictus) ....................................................... 137 Kern Canyon Slender Salamander (Batrachoseps simatus) ................................................ 142 Fairview Slender Salamander (Batrachoseps bramei) ........................................................ 146 Kings River Slender Salamander (Batrachoseps regius) .................................................... 150 Black Toad (Anaxyrus exsul) ............................................................................................... 154 Limestone Salamander (Hydromantes brunus) ................................................................... 160 Foothill Yellow-legged Frog (Rana boylii) ......................................................................... 164 California Golden Trout (Oncoryhnchus mykiss aguabonita)............................................. 172 Hardhead Minnow (Mylopharodon conocephalus) ............................................................. 176 Kern brook lamprey (Lampetra hubbsi) .............................................................................. 178 Kern River Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gilberti) ............................................... 186 Tehachapi fritillary butterfly (Speyeria egleis tehachapina) ............................................... 192 Apache Silverspot Butterfly (Speyeria nokomis apacheana) .............................................. 195 Western Pearlshell (Margaritifera falcata) ......................................................................... 198 Owens Valley Springsnail (Pyrgulopsis owensensis) ......................................................... 207 Wong’s Springsnail (Pyrgulopsis wongi) ............................................................................ 210 Sensitive Species not selected as Species of Conservation Concern ...................................... 214 Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis)................................................................................ 214 Pallid Bat (Antrozous pallidus) ........................................................................................... 222 Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) ............................................................................ 234 Wolverine (Gulo gulo) ........................................................................................................ 242 Western Pond Turtle (Actinemys marmorata) ..................................................................... 255 Panamint Alligator Lizard (Elgaria panamintina) .............................................................. 262 California Legless Lizard (Anniella pulchra) ...................................................................... 267 i Draft Biological Evaluation, Wildlife and Fish Forest Plan Revision Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra National Forests Contributers: ................................................................................................................................ 272 Tables Table 1. List of wildlife, fish and invertebrate species considered and forests with status for evaluation by national forest ................................................................................................... 1 Table 2. Acres of both sage-grouse priority habitat and population management unit (PMU) on the Inyo National Forest ........................................................................................................ 16 Table 3. Active livestock grazing allotments within sage-grouse priority habitat on the Inyo NF 18 Table 4. Sierra Nevada red fox habitat (CWHR) associations in the winter ................................. 57 Table 5. Sierra Nevada red fox habitat (CWHR) associations in the summer .............................. 57 Table 6. Proportion of sites occupied in the Sequoia and Sierra National Forests ........................ 88 Table 7. CWHR 2.1 high and moderate capability habitat for fisher (CWHR 2008 as modified by Davis et al. 2007 [CWHR2] and applied to southern Sierra Nevada forest types [CWHR2.1]) ............................................................................................................................................... 91 Table 8. Estimates of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Native Trout Waters of California Details Six of the State’S Most Scenic, Diverse, and Significant Native Trout Fisheries
    NATIVE TROUT WATERS OF CALIFORNIA Michael Carl The Ecological Angler www.ecoangler.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUTION – THE ORIGINAL SIX 4 ABOUT THE BOOK 4 CLAVEY RIVER 5 BACKGROUND 6 TROUT POPULATION DATA 6 STREAM POPULATIONS, REGULATIONS, AND ACCESS 7 DIRECTIONS TO REACH SEGMENT 3 AND 4 (E.G., BRIDGE CROSSING CLAVEY RIVER): 7 AREA MAP 8 CLAVEY RIVER FLOW STATISTICS 9 FISHING TECHNIQUES 9 EAGLE LAKE 10 BACKGROUND 11 BIG TROUT FOOD – TUI CHUBS 11 REGULATIONS AND ACCESS 11 DIRECTIONS TO EAGLE LAKE FROM RED BLUFF, CALIFORNIA: 11 AREA MAP 12 PRODUCTIVE TIMES AND ZONES TO FISH 13 FISHING TECHNIQUES 13 SPALDING TRACT – TOPO MAP 14 PIKES POINT – TOPO MAP 15 GOLDEN TROUT CREEK 16 OVERVIEW OF THE WATERSHED 17 ABUNDANCE OF CALIFORNIA GOLDEN TROUT 17 CALIFORNIA GOLDEN TROUT GENETIC DATA 17 STREAM POPULATIONS, REGULATIONS, AND ACCESS 18 DIRECTIONS TO COTTONWOOD PASS TRAILHEAD 18 AREA MAP 19 PHOTO JOURNAL – COTTONWOOD PASS TO TUNNEL MEADOW 20 FISHING TECHNIQUES 23 HEENAN LAKE 24 BACKGROUND 25 FLY ANGLER STATISTICS – 2007 SEASON (8/3/07 TO 10/28/07) 26 REGULATIONS AND ACCESS 27 AREA MAP 27 DIRECTIONS 27 PRODUCTIVE ZONES TO FISH 28 FISHING TECHNIQUES 28 UPPER KERN RIVER 29 BACKGROUND 30 KERN RIVER RAINBOWS 30 DISTRIBUTION OF KERN RIVER RAINBOWS 30 STREAM POPULATIONS, REGULATIONS AND ACCESS 31 MAP – LLOYD MEADOW ROAD TO FORKS OF THE KERN 32 SPOTLIGHT – FORKS OF THE KERN 33 DIRECTIONS AND TRAIL DESCRIPTION 33 RECOMMENDED FISHING GEAR 33 UPPER TRUCKEE RIVER 35 OVERVIEW OF THE WATERSHED 36 ABUNDANCE AND SIZE OF LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT 37 STREAM POPULATIONS, REGULATIONS, ACCESS & DISTANCE 37 DIRECTIONS TO REACH TRAILHEAD: 38 AREA MAP 39 TRAIL DESCRIPTION 40 FISHING TECHNIQUES 40 Introduction – The Original Six The Native Trout Waters of California details six of the state’s most scenic, diverse, and significant native trout fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • International Geology Review Unroofing History of Alabama And
    This article was downloaded by: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] On: 2 March 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 918588849] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK International Geology Review Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t902953900 Unroofing history of Alabama and Poverty Hills basement blocks, Owens Valley, California, from apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronology Guleed A. H. Ali a; Peter W. Reiners a; Mihai N. Ducea a a Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA To cite this Article Ali, Guleed A. H., Reiners, Peter W. and Ducea, Mihai N.(2009) 'Unroofing history of Alabama and Poverty Hills basement blocks, Owens Valley, California, from apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronology', International Geology Review, 51: 9, 1034 — 1050 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/00206810902965270 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00206810902965270 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Oaks (Quercus Spp.): a Brief History
    Publication WSFNR-20-25A April 2020 Oaks (Quercus spp.): A Brief History Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care / University Hill Fellow University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources Quercus (oak) is the largest tree genus in temperate and sub-tropical areas of the Northern Hemisphere with an extensive distribution. (Denk et.al. 2010) Oaks are the most dominant trees of North America both in species number and biomass. (Hipp et.al. 2018) The three North America oak groups (white, red / black, and golden-cup) represent roughly 60% (~255) of the ~435 species within the Quercus genus worldwide. (Hipp et.al. 2018; McVay et.al. 2017a) Oak group development over time helped determine current species, and can suggest relationships which foster hybridization. The red / black and white oaks developed during a warm phase in global climate at high latitudes in what today is the boreal forest zone. From this northern location, both oak groups spread together southward across the continent splitting into a large eastern United States pathway, and much smaller western and far western paths. Both species groups spread into the eastern United States, then southward, and continued into Mexico and Central America as far as Columbia. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Today, Mexico is considered the world center of oak diversity. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Figure 1 shows genus, sub-genus and sections of Quercus (oak). History of Oak Species Groups Oaks developed under much different climates and environments than today. By examining how oaks developed and diversified into small, closely related groups, the native set of Georgia oak species can be better appreciated and understood in how they are related, share gene sets, or hybridize.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids
    4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Qiao Wang Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 133 4.2 Phenology of Adults ..................................................................................................................... 134 4.3 Diet of Adults ............................................................................................................................... 138 4.4 Location of Host Plants and Mates .............................................................................................. 138 4.5 Recognition of Mates ................................................................................................................... 140 4.6 Copulation .................................................................................................................................... 141 4.7 Larval Host Plants, Oviposition Behavior, and Larval Development .......................................... 142 4.8 Mating Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 144 4.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 148 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings, 23Rd U.S. Department of Agriculture Interagency Research
    United States Department of Proceedings Agriculture 23rd U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Interagency Research Forum on Research Station Invasive Species 2012 General Technical Report NRS-P-114 The findings and conclusions of each article in this publication are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service. All articles were received in digital format and were edited for uniform type and style. Each author is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her paper. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal, agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fi sh or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. Cover graphic by Vincent D’Amico, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station. Manuscript received for publication August 2012 Published by: For additional copies: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamprey, Hagfish
    Agnatha - Lamprey, Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Super Class: Agnatha Hagfish Agnatha are jawless fish. Lampreys and hagfish are in this class. Members of the agnatha class are probably the earliest vertebrates. Scientists have found fossils of agnathan species from the late Cambrian Period that occurred 500 million years ago. Members of this class of fish don't have paired fins or a stomach. Adults and larvae have a notochord. A notochord is a flexible rod-like cord of cells that provides the main support for the body of an organism during its embryonic stage. A notochord is found in all chordates. Most agnathans have a skeleton made of cartilage and seven or more paired gill pockets. They have a light sensitive pineal eye. A pineal eye is a third eye in front of the pineal gland. Fertilization of eggs takes place outside the body. The lamprey looks like an eel, but it has a jawless sucking mouth that it attaches to a fish. It is a parasite and sucks tissue and fluids out of the fish it is attached to. The lamprey's mouth has a ring of cartilage that supports it and rows of horny teeth that it uses to latch on to a fish. Lampreys are found in temperate rivers and coastal seas and can range in size from 5 to 40 inches. Lampreys begin their lives as freshwater larvae. In the larval stage, lamprey usually are found on muddy river and lake bottoms where they filter feed on microorganisms. The larval stage can last as long as seven years! At the end of the larval state, the lamprey changes into an eel- like creature that swims and usually attaches itself to a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Musteloidea (Carnivora, Mammalia)
    e390-11 Montoya.qxd 1/2/12 09:36 Página 193 Estudios Geológicos, 67(2) julio-diciembre 2011, 193-206 ISSN: 0367-0449 doi:10.3989/egeol.40576.183 Musteloidea (Carnivora, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Venta del Moro (Valencia, Spain) Musteloidea (Carnivora, Mammalia) del Mioceno Superior de Venta del Moro (Valencia, España) P.Montoya1, J. Morales2, J. Abella2 ABSTRACT The purpose of the present work is to describe the Musteloidea from the Late Miocene locality of Venta del Moro (Valencia, Spain). We have identified the following species: Martes ginsburgi nov. sp., Lutra affinis Gervais, 1859, Plesiogulo monspessulanus Viret, 1939 and Promephitis alexejewi Schloss- er, 1924. Besides Plesiogulo monspessulanus which was already described in this locality and in Las Casiones (MN 13, Teruel Basin), we are approaching an unedited Musteloidea assemblage from the Miocene of the Iberian Peninsula. The m1 of Martes ginsburgi nov. sp. is similar in size and morphology to the Asian species of the genus, M. anderssoni and M. zdanskyi, but it differs in having a very wide M1 with a developed lingual platform. The presence of Lutra affinis is the third register of this species in the fossil record, since it was only previously known from the Pliocene of Montpellier (France) and the termi- nal Miocene of Maramena (Greece). Promephitis alexejewi is the first appearance of this species in Europe, which has been only registered until now in several localities of Mongolia and China. It differs from the rest of Promephitis species in the possession of a narrower m1, with a very sectorial trigonid. Keywords: Mammalia, Carnivora, Musteloidea, Martes, Lutra, Plesiogulo, Promephitis, Venta del Moro, Spain, Upper Miocene RESUMEN Se describen los Musteloidea procedentes del Mioceno terminal (MN13) de Venta del Moro (Valencia, España).
    [Show full text]
  • XIV. Appendices
    Appendix 1, Page 1 XIV. Appendices Appendix 1. Vertebrate Species of Alaska1 * Threatened/Endangered Fishes Scientific Name Common Name Eptatretus deani black hagfish Lampetra tridentata Pacific lamprey Lampetra camtschatica Arctic lamprey Lampetra alaskense Alaskan brook lamprey Lampetra ayresii river lamprey Lampetra richardsoni western brook lamprey Hydrolagus colliei spotted ratfish Prionace glauca blue shark Apristurus brunneus brown cat shark Lamna ditropis salmon shark Carcharodon carcharias white shark Cetorhinus maximus basking shark Hexanchus griseus bluntnose sixgill shark Somniosus pacificus Pacific sleeper shark Squalus acanthias spiny dogfish Raja binoculata big skate Raja rhina longnose skate Bathyraja parmifera Alaska skate Bathyraja aleutica Aleutian skate Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Bathyraja lindbergi Commander skate Bathyraja abyssicola deepsea skate Bathyraja maculata whiteblotched skate Bathyraja minispinosa whitebrow skate Bathyraja trachura roughtail skate Bathyraja taranetzi mud skate Bathyraja violacea Okhotsk skate Acipenser medirostris green sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus white sturgeon Polyacanthonotus challengeri longnose tapirfish Synaphobranchus affinis slope cutthroat eel Histiobranchus bathybius deepwater cutthroat eel Avocettina infans blackline snipe eel Nemichthys scolopaceus slender snipe eel Alosa sapidissima American shad Clupea pallasii Pacific herring 1 This appendix lists the vertebrate species of Alaska, but it does not include subspecies, even though some of those are featured in the CWCS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Trip to Study Oaks and Conifers in a Californian Landscape with the International Oak Society
    A Trip to Study Oaks and Conifers in a Californian Landscape with the International Oak Society Harry Baldwin and Thomas Fry - 2018 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Aims and Objectives: .................................................................................................................................................. 4 How to achieve set objectives: ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Sharing knowledge of experience gained: ....................................................................................................................... 4 Map of Places Visited: ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Itinerary .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Background to Oaks .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Cosumnes River Preserve ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brain-Size Evolution and Sociality in Carnivora
    Brain-size evolution and sociality in Carnivora John A. Finarellia,b,1 and John J. Flynnc aDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, 2534 C.C. Little Building, 1100 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; bMuseum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 1529 Ruthven Museum, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and cDivision of Paleontology and Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024 Edited by Alan Walker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, and approved April 22, 2009 (received for review February 16, 2009) Increased encephalization, or larger brain volume relative to body develop a comprehensive view of the evolutionary history of mass, is a repeated theme in vertebrate evolution. Here we present encephalization across 289 terrestrial species (including 125 an extensive sampling of relative brain sizes in fossil and extant extinct species) of Carnivora, providing an extensive sampling of taxa in the mammalian order Carnivora (cats, dogs, bears, weasels, fossil and living taxa for both major subclades: Caniformia and and their relatives). By using Akaike Information Criterion model Feliformia. selection and endocranial volume and body mass data for 289 species (including 125 fossil taxa), we document clade-specific Results evolutionary transformations in encephalization allometries. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) model selection recovered These evolutionary transformations include multiple independent 4 optimal models (OM) within 2 log-likelihood units of the encephalization increases and decreases in addition to a remark- highest score (Table 1). There is broad agreement among the ably static basal Carnivora allometry that characterizes much of the OM with differences primarily in estimates of allometric slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • References: Future Works
    Phylogenomics and Evolution of the Ursidae Family Department of Biology Ammary Jackson, Keanu Spencer, & Alissya Theis Fig 8. Red Panda Fig. 6. American Black Bear (Ailurus fulgens) (Ursus americanus) Introduction: Ursidae is a family of generally omnivorous mammals colloquially Objectives: Results: referred to as bears. The family consists of five genera: Ailuropoda ● To determine the relatedness among the 30 individual bear taxa. Red Panda (giant panda), Helarctos (sun bear), Melursus (sloth bear), Tremarctos Spectacled Bear ● To determine if Ailurus fulgens obtained its common Spectacled Bear (spectacled bear), and Ursus (black, brown, and polar bears) all of Polar Bear name (Red Panda) from similarities to the genes Polar Bear which are found in North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa Polar Bear belonging to the Ursidae family or if it’s simply based on Polar Bear (Kumar et al. 2017.) The phylogenetic relationship between Ursidae Polar Bear phenotypic attributes. Polar Bear bears and the red panda (Ailurus fulgens) has been somewhat Brown Bear inconsistent and controversial. Previous phylogenetic analyses have Brown Bear Brown Bear placed the red panda within the families Ursidae (bears), Procyonidae Polar Bear Brown Bear (raccoons), Pinnepedia (seals), and Musteloidea (raccoons and weasels, Brown Bear Brown Bear skunks, and badgers) (Flynn et al. 2000.) Determining monophyly Methods: Cave Bear Cave Bear would elucidate the evolutionary relationship between Ursidae bears Sloth Bear ● Mitochondrial gene sequences of the ATP6 and ND1 genes Sloth Bear and the Red Panda. This analysis (i) tested the monophyly of the family Sun Bear were taken from a sample of 31 species (30 Ursidae family Sun Bear Ursidae; and (ii) determined how the Red Panda fits within the Black Bear and 1 Ailuridae family).
    [Show full text]