The Chemistry and Biology of Discodermolide
HO
O O OH O O
OH NH2 OH
Yueheng Jiang November 20, 2003
-1- HO Outline O O OH O O OH NH2 OH
¾ Discovery and Biological Activity
¾ Total Syntheses
¾ Structure-Activity Relationships (SAR)
-2- Discovery Isolated by Gunasekera and co-workers in 1990 from the Caribbean deep-sea sponge (Discodermia dissoluta). 0.002% w/w isolation yield (7 mg/434 g of sponge). Found initially to have immunosuppressive and antifungal activities. Further revealed to be a potent microtubule stabilizer.
Gunasekera, S. P.; Gunasekera, M.; Longley, R. E.; Schulte, G. K. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 1346. Longley, R. E.; Caddigan, D.; Harmody, D.; Gunasekera, M.; Gunasekera, S. P.; Transplantation 1991, 52, 650. ter Haar, E.; Kowalski, R. J.; Hamel, E.; Lin, C. M.; Longley, R. E.; Gunasekera, S. P.; Rosenkranz, H. S.; Day, B. W. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 243. -3- Microtubule-stabilizing agents
AcO O O OH
R NH O O O OH OH Ph O H O NH2 OH HO AcO BzO HO R = Ph Taxol (BMS) HO R = OtBu Taxotere (Aventis) discodermolide O
O O
O O R NMe O H N S O NMe O H N OH HO N O O H O O OMe O H OH OO O OH O OAc OH CO2Me O O R = H epothilone A OH eleutherobin sarcodictyin A laulimalide R = Me epothilone B OH
-4- Cytotoxicity
Cytotoxic over a variety of cell lines (IC50 3-80 nM) More potent than Taxol Competitively inhibits the binding of Taxol to tubulin Active against multi-drug resistant (MDR) and Taxol- resistant (Pgp mediated MDR) cell lines
ter Haar, E.; Kowalski, R. J.; Hamel, E.; Lin, C. M.; Longley, R. E.; Gunasekera, S. P.; Rosenkranz, H. S.; Day, B. W. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 243. Kowalski, R. J.; Giannakakou, P.; Gunasekera, S. P.; Longley, R. E.; Day, B. W.; Hamel, E.; Mol. Pharmacol. 1997, 52, 613. -5- Mechanism of action
Promote tubulin polymerization in vitro Stabilize microtubules against depolymerization Interfere with Taxol-binding to microtubules Induce microtubule bundles in cells Consequences: Interfere with proper formation of mitotic spindle
Cause arrest of cell cycle
Cell death by apoptosis
-6- Dynamic Equilibria of Tubulin-Microtubules
Heterodimer Formation Initiation Polymerzation/Elongation
(+) End (more grown)
Nucleation center
's P p T 5 nm a G Microtubule M + ; 2 g M o C (-) End (less grown) ; 0 α-tubulin 2+ ~50 kD Ca
D is Ta c o x -5 de ol KD = 10 r o m r (α.β) ol id e Taxol or Discodermolide β-tubulin ~50 kD Stabilized Nucleation centers Stabilized microtubules Taxol or Discodermolide
Nicolaou, K. C.; Roshangar, F.; Vourlounis, D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2014. -7- Microtubule Bundling
Influence of discodermolide on a transformed mouse fibroblast. Discodermolide induces microtubule bundling (tubulin appears green), which is clearly seen in the pseudopodia and near the nucleus (appears blue). As a result of this microtubule bundling, the cell is undergoing apoptosis and fragmentation of the nucleus can be seen.
Sasse, F. Current Biology, 2000, 10, R469.
-8- Unique Activities
Discodermolide could not substitute for Taxol in a Taxol-resistant cell line (A549-T12) that requires low concentrations of Taxol for normal growth.
Exhibits synergistic effects with Taxol in several cultured cell lines (not observed with Taxol/epothilones or Taxol/eleutherobin).
Martello, L. A.; McDaid, H. M.; Regl, D. L.; Yang, C. H.; Ment, D. T.; Pettus, R. R.; Kaufman, M. D.; Arimoto, H.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Smith, A. B. III; Horwitz, S. B. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 1978. Giannakakou, P.; Fojo, T. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 1613. -9- Potential Candidate for Cancer Chemotherapy
Novel structure Greater or comparable efficacy to Taxol Poor substrate for P-glycoprotein (Pgp). Synergistic effect in combination with Taxol Greater water solubility (100-fold > Taxol)
Entered Phase I clinical trials in 2002 as a chemotherapeutic agent for use against solid tumors.
Myles, D. C. Annual Reports in Med. Chem., 2002, 37, 125.
-10- Taxol (semi-synthesis) Epothilone (fermentation) Discodermolide ( ???)
Total Synthesis of Discodermolide ! (-)-Discodermolide (+)-Discodermolide
S. L. Schreiber (1993) S. L. Schreiber (1996) A. B. Smith (1995) J. A. Marshall (1998) D. C. Myles (1997) A. B. Smith (1999, 2003) I. Paterson (2000, 2002) Novartis (2003) D. C. Myles (2003)
-11- Selected Total Synthesis of (+)-Discodermolide
Schreiber 1st total synthesis of (+/-)-discodermolide established absolute configuration
Smith Delivered ~1 g of (+)-discodermolide (2nd generation)
Paterson Novel approaches
Novartis Meet supply needs for clinical studies by total synthesis
-12- Structure and conformation of (+) discodermolide
24 HO 17 19 7 21 O O 5 OH O O 1 13 OH NH2
OH
X-ray structure of discodermolide; hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity
Paterson, I.; Florence, G. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2003, 2193.
-13- General Features
24 HO 7 17 * * * O O OH O O * * * 1 13 * * * OH NH2 OH
* * * OH repeating anti, syn-stereotriad divided into three fragments Introduction of two Z-alkenes of roughly equal complexity and terminal Z-diene
HO CO2Me Roche ester Fragment Coupling
-14- Strategy by Scheiber
Nozaki-Kishi coupling enolate alkylation 24 8 HO 15 O O OH O O (+)-discodermolide 1 1 5 13 OH NH2
OH I 8 24 PhS O 7 H 15 OPiv 1 16 O + +
OTBS OTBS Negishi coupling A O OPMB B Still-Gennari C HWE olefination
Roush crotylation Roush crotylation
TBSO OH TBSO OH 2 TBSO OH 3 2
Roche ester CO2Me OH -15- Strategy by Smith 2nd Generation Wittig olefination Negishi coupling 24 HO 15 19 9 Yamamoto O O OH O O olefination 1 13 OH NH2
OH (+)-discodermolide 1
O Evans aldol O O I 8 H 1 PMBO 14 I 15 19 + OTBS + 9 OTBS TBSO O O OTBS A B Zhao-Wittig C PMP olefination
PMBO N CO2Me O Common Precursor 2 OH OH O Roche ester Evans aldol reaction -16- Strategy by Paterson 1st generation lithium aldol
boron aldol 24 16 HO 7 9
O O OH O O (+)-discodermolide 1 1 13 OH NH2
OH Nozaki-Hiyama/ boron aldol boron aldol ArO O Peterson elimination
24 6 PMBO 9 16 ++H 17 MeO2C TBSO O C A B O O TBSO PMB boron aldol Claisen [3,3]
BnO PMBO OBz O O 2 3 O 4 HO CO2Me EtO2C OH Roche ester ethyl-(S)-lactate
-17- Synthesis of Stereotriad by Schreiber
CO2iPr CO2iPr Roche-ester O O CO2iPr CO2iPr B O B O H (R,R)-(E)-crotylboronate (S,S)-(Z)-crotylboronate TBSO OH TBSO O TBSO OH 2 Roush crotylation 3
Subunit A & C Subunit B
Hung, D. T.; Nerenberg, J. B.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11054. Roush, W. R.; Palkowitz, A. D.; Ando, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6348.
-18- Synthesis of stereotriad by Smith
Ph
NH N O
1 PMBO CCl , PPTS O O HO 3 PMBO H n-Bu2BOTf, Et3N CO2Me 2 LAH 3 Swern Oxidation O 52-55%, 4 steps 3
Ph
O MeNH(OMe).HCl PMBO N PMBO N O
OH O O AlMe3, THF, 98% OH O
4 Common Precursor 2
Smith, A. B. III; Beauchamp, T. J.; LaMarche, M. J.; Kaufman, M. D.; Qiu, Y.; Arimoto, H.; Jones, D. R.; Kobayashi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8654. Smith, A. B. III; Kaufman, M. D.; Beauchamp, T. J.; LaMarche, M. J.; Arimoto, H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1823. Iversen, T.; Bundle, D. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981, 1240. -19- Synthesis of stereotriad by Paterson
cHex2BCl Et3N, Et2O BnO LiBH BnO 4 BnO 6 steps Subunit A O + O - O 86% O B > 30:1 dr OH OH 2 H 5 L L 6
cHex2BCl, Et3N methacrolein Me4NBH(OAc)3 6 steps PMBO Subunit B 94%, > 30:1 dr 95%, >30:1 dr PMBO OH OH 3 O PMBO O OH 7 8
TBSO CHO TBSO 6 steps OBz OBz Subunit C O cHex2BCl, Me2NEt PMBO O 4 > 97% ds 10
Paterson, I.; Florence, G. J.; Gerlach, K.; Scott, J. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 377. Paterson, I.; Arnott, E. A. Tetrohedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7185. Paterson, I.; Wallace, D. J.; Cowden, C. J. Synthesis 1998, 639.
-20- Synthesis of trisubstituted (Z)-alkene Schreiber
KHMDS, CO2Me O (CF3CH2O)2POCHMeCO2Me 14 TBSO OTBS 93%, Z:E >20:1 TBSO OTBS
Sch-5 (Still-Gennari HWE olefination) Sch-8
Smith
o 1 Ph3PEtI, n-BuLi, 0 C o 2 0.1 M I2 in THF, -78 C I 3 NaHMDS, -23oC PMBO 13 H PMBO 9 14 4 Add 6, -33oC TBSO TBSO O 46%, 3 steps, Z:E = 8-17:1 Sm-5 (Zhao-Wittig olefination) Subunit B
Still, W. C.; Gennari, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4405. Chen, J.; Wang, T.; Zhao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2827. -21- Synthesis of trisubstituted (Z)-alkene Paterson
+
9 1 NaIO4, NaHCO3 Me MeOH, H2O, rt O [3, 3] PMBO O O O 2 DBU, xylene, reflux Me 82% PMBO PhSe 9 14 AcO O PMBO 11 13 PMBO 9 16 Me O 3 steps, 81% O O
Me 15 PMBO O OTBS Subunit B
Burton, J. W.; Clark, J. S.; Derrer, S.; Stork, T. C.; Bendall, J. G.; Holmes, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7483.
-22- Synthesis of terminal (Z)-diene Schreiber
NaHMDS I + - Pd(PPh3)4 Ph3P CH2I I O H2CCHZnBr 75% TBSO OPMB TBSO OH 80% TBSO OPMB (Stork-Zhao Sch-4 Wittig olefination) Sch-6 Sch-7
Smith
i 24 21 O Ph2P Ti(O Pr)4Li then MeI TrO O OPMB TrO O OPMB TBS 76%, 2 steps Z:E = 12:1 OTBS 9 TBS OTBS Sm-7 Yamamoto Olefination Sm-8
1. Stock, G.; Zhao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2173. Ikeda, Y.; Ukai, J.; Ikeda, N.; Yamamoto, H. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 723.
-23- Synthesis of terminal (Z)-diene
Paterson
SiMe3
TBSO H LnCr SiMe3 TBSO
PMBO OH PMBO O Nozaki-Hiyama 11 allylation 12
KH, 98% 24 Z:E = > 20:1 TBSO
Peterson OPMB elimination 13
Takai, K.; Kuroda, T.; Nakatsukasa, S.; Oshima, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5585. Aicher, T. D.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3463. Ager, D. Org. React., 1990, 38, 1.
-24- Fragment coupling Schreiber I 8 PhS O 7 H HO OPiv 15 OPiv 1 15 O 7 A PhS O OTBS 1 5 steps OTBS OTBS 0.011% NiCl2/CrCl2, 65% Subunit B 2:1 dr at C7 OTBS 9 (Nozaki-Kishi coupling) 24 16 TBSO Br TBSO 15 15 16 24 PhS O O OPMB PhS O C 1 O OPMB OTBS OTBS 11 LDA (1.1 eq), THF, 0oC OTBS 10 65% OTBS 24 TBSO 19 16
LiN(SiMe2Ph)2 (5 eq) PhS O O MeI, 47% OTBS 3:1 dr at C16 12 OTBS
Takai, K.; Kuroda, T.; Nakatsukasa, S.; Oshima, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5585. Aicher, T. D.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3463.
-25- Fragment coupling Smith
1 ZnCl2 (1.15 eq.) I 15 2 t-BuLi (3.45 eq.), -78oC to rt 19 8 steps TBSO OO 3 Pd(PPh3)4 (0.05 eq.), 66% O OO I 14 TBS PMP PMBO 14 PMBO OTBS PMP subunit C 6 TBSO subunit B
NaHMDS (0.95 eq.), THF, -20oC
O - + IPh3 P O OPMB O O 8 H 9 TBS 69% OTBS OTBS Z:E = 24:1 10 OTBS A (1.05 eq.) 8 24 TBSO 9
O O OOPMB TBS OTBS 11 OTBS
-26- Fragment coupling Paterson
1 LiTMP, LiBr HO O O 2 LiAlH4, 62% > 30:1 dr PMBO 17 PMBO 9 steps 16 16 24 OH OPMB H 17 OTBS OTBS O OPMB 16 Subunit B Subunit C
24 HO (+)-Ipc2BCl O 7 7 87%, 5:1 at C7 O O O O MeO2C H O O O TBS 6 OTBS NH2 TBS 1 2 OTBS NH MeO C 2 2 OTBS 17 TBSO O 18 Subunit A
Paterson, I.; Goodman, J. M.; Lister, M. A.; Schumann, R. C.; McClure, C. K.; Norcross, R. D. Tetrahedron, 1990, 46, 4663. Mulzer, J.; Berger, M. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8393. -27- Improvement
2nd Generation: ultrahigh pressure Smith Undesired intramolecular cyclization 1 PPh3, I2 2 PPh3, i-Pr2NEt 12.8 kbar, 6d 82%, 2 steps -IPh +P 11 O OPMB 9 11 O OPMB 12.8 kbar = 3 TBS 12600 atm = 186,000 psi !! 9 TBS OH OTBS OTBS
H R R I H H H H OTBS OTBS + Me R Me Me - + I Me TBSO TBSO R H H
3rd Generation: improvement Reduction of the steric bulk at C11
1 PPh3, I2 o 2 PPh3, i-Pr2NEt, 100 C 70%, 2 steps - + 9 11 O OPMB IPh3 P 11 O OPMB TBS ambient pressure 9 TBS OH OMOM OMOM
Smith, A.B. III; Kaufman, M. D.; Beauchamp, T. J.; LaMarche, M. J.; Arimoto, H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4405. -28- Paterson 1st generation Problem
24 (+)-Ipc BCl R2 2 1 O 7 R 7 87%, 5:1 at C7 O 10 O O O H O O O MeO2C TBS 1 6 TBS OTBS NH2 OTBS NH2 MeO2C 2 17 TBSO O OTBS 18
18a: R1 = OH, R2 = H Nu 1 2 reagent 18a : 18b yield 18b: R = H, R = OH (desired) + H + H Me c-Hex2BCl 7 : 1 67% O 10 (+)-Ipc2BCl 1 : 5 87% 7 H H RL
-29- Paterson 2nd Generation boron aldol 24 HO 100% substrate control O O 6 OH O O 1 5 OH 1 NH2 lithium aldol OH 24 O 16
5 H + 11 OH O O MeO2C 6 TBSO O A OH NH2 alkylation ArO O 24 PMBO H 15 9 16 + 14 O OPMB
TBSO C Still-Gennari B HWE olefination
boron aldol reduced overall steps PMBO PMBO OH from 42 to 35 O OH common precursor 19 -30- Paterson 2nd Generation Improvement
O cHex2BCl, Et3N 16 6 O O O 10 1 5 H TBS MeO2C OTBS NH2 TBSO O 19 Subunit A R L + 10 24 8 L O H 64%, 20:1 dr at C5 H - HO OOO B MeO2C O L 5 TBS OTBS NH2 O R + OH 20
Paterson, I.; Delgado, O.; Florence, G. J.; Lyothier, I.; Scott, J. P.; Sereinig, N. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 35.
-31- Strategy by Novartis
boron aldol (Paterson) 24 18 HO 9
O O 6 OH O O 1 14 2+ OH NH2 Mg -chelated aldol (novel)
OH
18 6 9 N MeO2C O + OH O O O O O 14 TBS OH NH2
Zhao-Wittig Olefination (Smith) Roush Crotylation (Schreiber) MeO C 9 18 2 + H 19 Nozaki-Hiyama/ PMBO O Peterson elimination 13 O (Paterson) OH OH Negishi coupling (Smith)
PMBO H PMBO H HO HO CO Me O CO2Me 2 O commercially available
Francavilla, C.; Chen, W.; Kinder, F. R. Jr. Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 1233. -32- Next Generation ???
Longest Linear Sequences Steps Yield Schreiber 24 4.3% Smith 24 6% Myles 25 1.4% Marshall 29 2.2% Paterson 23 10.3% Novartis 21 N.A.
Despite considerable synthetic efforts, there continues to be a pressing demand for a more practical and scaleable total synthesis …
-33- SAR Summary
Antiproliferative Potencies (IC50, nM) Against A549 or MG63 Cells of Discodermolide (1), and Analogues 2-3e.
A549 MG63 Discodermolide 1 3.6 6 R (R = Me) HO 17 7 16 2 (R = H; 16-demethyl) n.d. 10 O O 11 OH O O
3 OH NH2 Acetylated analogues: OH 3a (3-OAc) 3.8 3b (7-OAc) 0.8 3c (3,7-OAc) 0.8 3d (3,11-OAc) 164 3e (3,17-OAc) 524
N. Choy, Y. Shin, P. Q. Nguyen, D. P. Curran, R. Balanchandran, C. Madiraju, B. W. Day, J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46, 2846-2864. Nerenberg, J. B.; Hung, D. T.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11054. Gunasekera, S. P.; Longley, R. E.; Isbrucker, R. A. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 171. -34- SAR Summary
Antiproliferative Potencies (IC50, nM) Against A549 Cells of Discodermolide (1), and Analogues 4a-4d.
HO R 7 O O 14 OH O O O O OH O O
OH NH2 OH NH2 OH 3
A549 A549 4a (14-cis, demethyl) 7.8 4c (3-dehydro, R = OH) 1.8 4b (14-trans, demethyl) 485 4d (3-dehydro, R = H) 11.4
Martello, L. A.; LaMarche, M. J.; He, L.; Beauchamp, T. J.; Smith, A. B. III; Horwitz, S. B. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 843. -35- Summary
Discodermolide, a marine natural product, shares the same microtubule-stabilizing mechanism as Taxol and has a promising anticancer profile.
However, the supply problem is still hampering further biological and SAR studies. To date, total synthesis is the only economical means of providing useful quantities of Discodermolide. Despite considerable synthetic efforts, there continues to be a demand for a more practical and scaleable total synthesis.
-36- Acknowledgements
Prof. Stephen F. Nelsen, Prof. Steven D. Burke
Brian Lucas, Andy Hawk
Dr. Jian Hong, Dr. Lei Jiang
Dr. Stuart Rosenblum, Dr. Michael Wong, Dr. Ron Kuang Lei Chen, Dr. Gopinadhan Anilkumar
-37-