DOCSLIB.ORG

Truths Ancient and Modern1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Truths Ancient and Modern1 CDD: 501 TRUTHS ANCIENT AND MODERN1 DAVID MILLER Department of Philosophy University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL UK [email protected] Abstract: The paper presents a comparison of the theories of truth, and the sol- utions of the liar paradox, proposed by Thomas Bradwardine (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), and Alfred Tarski (1901–1983). Keywords: Self-reference. Bradwardine. Buridan. Tarski. Liar paradox. Method of diagonalization. Theory of signification. Theories of truth. 1. INTRODUCTION The subject of this paper is truth, and its opposite, falsity, es- pecially when they live together. That is to say, I wish to turn my attention once again to the ancient paradox of the liar, one of the most venerable problems of logic. My pretext for returning to a subject so familiar and so deeply explored by others is the recent revival by my 1This is an augmented and corrected version of an invited lecture given at the meeting Science, Truth and Consistency, held at the State Uni- versity of Campinas (UNICAMP) from 25–28 August 2009 in celebration of the 80th birthday of Newton da Costa. Versions of the lecture have been giv- en also at Kyoto University in July 2009, at the XVII Foro Nacional de Filosofía de Colombia, held at the University of Caldas (sede Palogrande) from 15–18 September 2009, at the University of Valparaíso in October 2009, and at the University of Edinburgh in March 2010. I am indebted to Stephen Read for several valuable comments and corrections. The Spanish version of the lecture is expected to appear in due course in the journal Discusiones Filosóficas (Manizales), together with a brief response from Read. Manuscrito — Rev. Int. Fil., Campinas, v. 34, n. 1, p. 267-292, jan.-jun. 2011. 268 DAVID MILLER compatriot, the philosopher Stephen Read, of a resolution of this para- dox, and others, that was proposed in the 14th century by Thomas Bradwardine, a little known Englishman today, but a man of much intellectual distinction. Read (2008a, 2008b, 2010) not only presents Bradwardine’s theory of truth sympathetically in modern dress. He is also an enthusiastic proponent of it, maintaining that it is in various respects superior to the predominant theory today; that is, the theory due to Alfred Tarski. I am by no means in agreement with this judge- ment. I think, nevertheless, that Bradwardine’s contribution deserves our attention, and that we can learn much from an investigation, even a brief one, into this new-old solution. 2. THE LIAR PARADOX In speaking of the liar paradox, I may take for granted the general idea, that is, of a sentence, to all appearances well constructed and in- telligible, that is true if & only if it is false (or not true). The paradox has assumed many different forms in the course of its history, from the most everyday to the most mathematical. There are simple statements such as ‘I am lying’, in which there is an implicit reference to the time at which the statement is made. There are additionally the sentences ‘This sentence states something false’ and ‘This is a false sentence’, which use demonstrative adjectives or pronouns to indicate what they are talking about. I shall follow here the common custom of calling such sentences self-referential, by which I mean that it is the gramma- tical subject of the sentence, though not the sentence itself, that refers to the whole sentence. An important version of the liar paradox uses only indirect self- reference, and shows that direct self-reference does not constitute the heart of the problem. If, for example, Daphnis says that Chloe is speaking falsely, and Chloe says that Daphnis is speaking truly, then Manuscrito — Rev. Int. Fil., Campinas, v. 34, n. 1, p. 267-292, jan.-jun. 2011. TRUTHS ANCIENT AND MODERN 269 there is no consistent attribution of truth values to these utterances. If Daphnis’ utterance is true, then Chloe’s is false, in which case Daph- nis’ utterance is also false; and hence Chloe’s utterance is true, and so Daphnis’ utterance is true after all. We have travelled in a complete circle without any stable attribution of truth or falsity to either of the two utterances. There are versions of the paradox that depend for their effectiveness on an empirical premise that does not appear explicitly. For example, there is the paradox of Epimenides the Cretan, who said that all Cre- tans are liars; that is, that all Cretans persistently and unfailingly utter falsehoods. This utterance of Epimenides cannot be true, which implies that not all Cretans unfailingly utter falsehoods. That is to say, there is some Cretan, Epimenides or someone else, who on one occasion at least utters something true. It is astonishing that Epimenides’ mere utterance of what he uttered can have such an outcome. The inverse of this paradox is Curry’s paradox (Goldstein (1986)), a sentence such as ‘If this sentence is true then God exists’. If this condi- tional sentence is false, its antecedent is true, and hence the conditional is not false but true, and, what is more, has a true antecedent. Using the rule of modus ponens (or the truth table for the conditional) we may conclude that the consequent is true also; that is, that God exists. In such a way we may demonstrate ab initio any sentence that we wish to demonstrate. I should mention also the so-called paradox of the truth-teller, a sen- tence that attributes truth, and nothing more, to itself. The problem here is that there seems to be no consideration whatever that could help us to assign a truth value to this sentence. In this paper, in order to avoid problems associated with the use of demonstrative pronouns and adjectives, indexical expressions, and other idiomatic locutions that introduce into the discussion elements that are far from formal and at times undeniably empirical, I shall Manuscrito — Rev. Int. Fil., Campinas, v. 34, n. 1, p. 267-292, jan.-jun. 2011. 270 DAVID MILLER mean by the liar paradox some version generated by the method of diagonalization invented by Gödel in 1931. What follows is an adaptation of a construction by Tarski that is hidden in note 11 of his popular article (1944), and rarely mentioned. If y is a sentence of the form ‘b has B’, let the transform y? of y be the sentence ‘ “b has B” has B’. For example, y may be the true sentence ‘The first sentence of the first published English translation of Witt- genstein’s Tractatus has exactly eight words’, in which case y? is the false sentence ‘ “The first sentence of the first published English trans- lation of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus has exactly eight words” has exactly eight words’. Let z be the sentence ‘b has a false transform’. Then z?, the transform of z, is ‘ “b has a false transform” has a false transform’. It is intuitively evident that z? is true if & only if the transform of z is false, that is, if & only if z? is false. We may construct likewise an example of the truth-teller paradox. Let x be the sentence ‘b has a true transform’. Its transform x?, that is, ‘ “b has a true transform” has a true transform’ is equivalent to the sentence ‘x? is true’. Henceforth z? (or any other similar sentences constructed by the method of diagonalization) will be given the name U, and called a liar. A sentence like x? will be called a truth teller. Note, however, that the grammatical subject of the sentence U, that is, the clausal name ‘“b has a false transform” ’ does not refer to U (but to z). U is not a self-referential sentence in the usual sense, though it says something about itself. We must note also a point of great importance: that if we assume the classical truth table for the operation of negation, that is, that a sentence y is true if & only if its negation ¬ y is false, then the nega- tion ¬ U of U is equally a liar, since ¬ U is true if & only if U is false, that is, if & only if U is true, that is, if & only if ¬ U is false. This sentence ¬ U, that is, ‘ “b has a false transform” has a true transform’, may seem to be even less self-referential than is U, since we cannot Manuscrito — Rev. Int. Fil., Campinas, v. 34, n. 1, p. 267-292, jan.-jun. 2011. TRUTHS ANCIENT AND MODERN 271 identify ¬ U with any expression mentioned in ¬ U. Each of Uand ¬ U says something about U, but only one of them actually is U. But this asymmetry is an illusion. To see this, let the countertransform y† of a sentence y of the form ‘b has B’ be the sentence ‘the sentence ‘ “b has B” does not have B’. Let z be the sentence ‘b has a false transform’, as before, and let z†, the countertransform of z, be called W . Then W is interdeducible with ¬ U, and ¬ W is interdeducible with U. Each of W and ¬ W says something about W , but only one of them actually is W . In short, ¬ U, which is equivalent to W , is just as self-referential as U is. We shall sometimes say that U, and other liars such as ¬ U, W , and ¬ W exhibit the phenomenon of reflexivity. An old solution to the liar paradox, formulated a century before Bradwardine, is that of cassationism (Goldstein (2008)), which judges that reflexive locutions are often, or always, senseless, saying nothing, and should be excluded from language.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Three Schools of Paraconsistency K T∗ P D,M U [email protected]
    Three Schools of Paraconsistency K T∗ P D,M U [email protected] Received by Greg Restall Published July 1, 2003 http://www.philosophy.unimelb.edu.au/ajl/2003 c 2003 Koji Tanaka Abstract: A logic is said to be paraconsistent if it does not allow everything to follow from contradictory premises. There are several approaches to paraconsistency. This paper is concerned with several philosophical posi- tions on paraconsistency. In particular, it concerns three ‘schools’ of para- consistency: Australian, Belgian and Brazilian. The Belgian and Brazilian schools have raised some objections to the dialetheism of the Australian school. I argue that the Australian school of paraconsistency need not be closed down on the basis of the Belgian and Brazilian schools’ objections. In the appendix of the paper, I also argue that the Brazilian school’s view of logic is not coherent. But though logic has come a long way very recently, it has a longer way to go, both in whom it involves and what it investigates. There are, for in- stance, virtually no black researchers, and exceedingly few women are en- gaged; and for all the proclaimed rationality of modern humans and their institutions, logic touches comparatively little human practice. Differ- ently, there remain many notions of considerable logical import, some of historical significance, of which we lack decent accounts or, sometimes, a clear appreciation. To the satisfactory elucidation of these, sociative logics can make essential contributions. Sylvan (1989) p. 133. 1 I A logic is said to be paraconsistent if it does not allow everything to fol- low from contradictory premises: it is not the case that for any α and β, ∗I would like to thank Graham Priest for making some of the ideas contained in the paper clear and for his comments on drafts of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton Da Costa on Non-Reflexive Logics and Identity
    Becker Arenhart, Jonas Rafael Newton da Costa on non-reflexive logics and identity Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Argentina. Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Documento descargado de RIDAA-UNQ Repositorio Institucional Digital de Acceso Abierto de la Universidad Nacional de Quilmes de la Universidad Nacional de Quilmes Cita recomendada: Becker Arenhart, J. R. (2019). Newton da Costa on non-reflexive logics and identity. Metatheoria, 9(2), 19-31. Disponible en RIDAA-UNQ Repositorio Institucional Digital de Acceso Abierto de la Universidad Nacional de Quilmes http://ridaa.unq.edu.ar/handle/20.500.11807/2536 Puede encontrar éste y otros documentos en: https://ridaa.unq.edu.ar Newton da Costa on Non-Reflexive Logics and Identity Newton da Costa sobre la lógica no-reflexiva y la identidad Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart† Abstract Newton da Costa pioneered first-order systems of so-called non-reflexive logics (NRL). According to those systems of logic, the reflexive law of identity is restricted; it does not apply to every kind of object the system deals with. NRL were later developed into higher-order systems and quasi-set theory by Décio Krause. The main motivation to develop such systems came from non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Intuitively, it is argued that quantum entities somehow “lost their identities”, they are non-individuals. Non-reflexive logics are the systems employed to formally underpin such a metaphysical interpretation of the theory. In this paper we re-access da Costa’s contributions in the light of recent developments on both the metaphysics of quantum mechanics and on the latest developments of the formalism.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 QUESTIONS ABOUT UNIVERSAL LOGIC 13 Questions to Jean-Yves B´Eziau, by Linda Eastwood
    Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 35:2/3 (2006), pp. 133–150 Jean-Yves B´eziau 13 QUESTIONS ABOUT UNIVERSAL LOGIC 13 questions to Jean-Yves B´eziau, by Linda Eastwood The expression “universal logic” prompts a number of misunderstandings pressing up against to the confusion prevailing nowadays around the very notion of logic. In order to clear up such equivocations, I prepared a series of questions to Jean-Yves B´eziau,who has been working for many years on his project of universal logic, recently in the University of Neuchˆatel, Switzerland. 1. Although your proposal to develop a universal logic is very appealing, isn’t it a utopian one? Isn’t it an absurd, or even dangerous thing to believe that it would be possible to develop a unique logic accounting for everything? Let us immediately reject some misunderstanding; universal logic, as I understand it, is not one universal logic. In fact, from the viewpoint of universal logic the existence of one universal logic is not even possible, and this is a result that can easily be shown. One might thus say somehow ironically the following: according to universal logic there is no universal logic. Some people in some countries have always tried to elaborate a uni- versal system that would account for any sort of reasoning, or reasoning as a whole. Aristotelian logic was depicted itself as a universal one. More recently, first-order classical logic appeared to some as a universal system accounting for mathematical reasoning as well as current one, that is, the one used to buy your bread at the bakery.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentence, Proposition, Judgment, Statement, and Fact: Speaking About the Written English Used in Logic John Corcoran
    Sentence, Proposition, Judgment, Statement, and Fact: Speaking about the Written English Used in Logic John Corcoran Dedication: for Professor Newton da Costa, friend, collaborator, co-discoverer of the Truth-set Principle, and co-creator of the Classical Logic of Variable-binding Term Operators-on his eightieth birthday. abstract. The five ambiguous words|sentence, proposition, judg- ment, statement, and fact|each have meanings that are vague in the sense of admitting borderline cases. This paper discusses sev- eral senses of these and related words used in logic. It focuses on a constellation of recommended primary senses. A judgment is a pri- vate epistemic act that results in a new belief; a statement is a public pragmatic event involving an utterance. Each is executed by a unique person at a unique time and place. Propositions and sentences are timeless and placeless abstractions. A proposition is an intensional entity; it is a meaning composed of concepts. A sentence is a linguistic entity. A written sentence is a string of characters. A sentence can be used by a person to express meanings, but no sentence is intrinsically meaningful. Only propositions are properly said to be true or to be false|in virtue of facts, which are subsystems of the universe. The fact that two is even is timeless; the fact that Socrates was murdered is semi-eternal; the most general facts of physics|in virtue of which propositions of physics are true or false|are eternal. As suggested by the title, this paper is meant to be read aloud. 1 Introduction The words|sentence, proposition, judgment, statement, and fact|are am- biguous in that logicians use each of them with multiple normal meanings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lvov-Warsaw School : a True Mythology
    The Lvov-Warsaw School : a True Mythology Jean-Yves Beziau Abstract. I discuss various aspects of the Lvov-Warsaw School: its past, present and future; its location, evolution, thematics; the variety of its members. I de- velop this analysis on the basis of my 25-year experience with Poland. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). Primary 01A72; Secondary 0303, 03A05, 03B22, 03B45; 03B50; 03B53; 03C95. Keywords. Lvov-Warsaw School, Twardowski, Les´niewski,Lukasiewi cz, Tarski, Polish Logic, Metalogic, Methodology of Deductive Sciences, Consequence, Universal Logic. Dedicated to Jan Zygmunt my host during my first stay in Poland, Wroc law, 1992-93 Contents 1. From Bah´ıa Blanca to Wroc law 2 1.1. Meeting with Stan Surma at the end of the world 2 1.2. The Polish Brazilian connection 3 1.3. Polish surroundings 5 2. The Atopicity of the Lvov-Warsaw School 9 2.1. A school without a location 9 2.2. A school without a topic 14 2.3. A school which is not a school 19 3. The Future of the Lvov-Warsaw school 21 3.1. No Future 21 3.2. Logic in Poland 1992-2017 24 3.3. The Universal Logic Project 31 Acknowledgments 34 References 34 2 Jean-Yves Beziau This paper is an introductory chapter of a book about a very famous school of logic. I did not “order” this book but I am very glad to have received this proposal and the book to be published in a book series I have created inspired by this school. The present paper is a mix between personal recollections and logico-philosophical reflections on this glorious school of logic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum and the Classical Domains As Provisional Parallel Coexistents
    The quantum and the classical domains as provisional parallel coexistents . Michel Paty To cite this version: Michel Paty. The quantum and the classical domains as provisional parallel coexistents .. Synthese, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2000, 1-2, p. 179-200. halshs-00185365 HAL Id: halshs-00185365 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00185365 Submitted on 12 Nov 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Synthese (Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston), 125, n°1-2, oct.-nov. 2000, 179-200 (French, Steven ; Krause, Décio ; Doria, Francisco (eds.), In honour of Newton da Costa, on the occasion of his seventieth birthday). The quantum and the classical domains as provisional parallel coexistents Michel PATY An essay in honour of Newton da Costa with admiration, friendship and saudades ABSTRACT. We consider the problem of the relationship between the quantum and the classical domains from the point of view that it is possible to speak of a direct physical description of quantum systems having physical properties. We put emphasis, in evidencing it, on the specific quantum concept of indistiguishability of identical in a conceptual way (and not in a logical way in the vein of «da Costa's school»).
    [Show full text]
  • A Single Proof of Classical Behaviour in Da Costa's Cn Systems
    A single proof of classical behaviour in da Costa’s Cn systems Mauricio Osorio, José Abel Castellanos Universidad de las Américas, Sta. Catarina Martir, Cholula, Puebla, 72820 México {osoriomauri,jose.castellanosjo}@gmail.com Abstract. A strong negation in da Costa’s Cn systems can be naturally ∗ extended from the strong negation (¬ ) of C1. In [1] Newton da Costa ∗ proved the conectives {→, ∧, ∨, ¬ } in C1 satisfy all schemas and infer- ence rules of classical logic. In the following paper we present a proof that all logics in the Cn herarchy also behave classically as C1. This result tell us the existance of a common property among the paraconsistent family of logics created by da Costa. Keywords: Paraconsistent logic, Cn systems, Strong negation 1 Introduction According to the authors in [1] a paraconsistent logic is the underlying logic for inconsistent but non-trivial theories. In fact, many authors [2, 3] have pointed out paraconsistency is mainly due to the construction of a negation operator which satisfies some properties about classical logic, but at the same time do not hold the so called law of explosion α, ¬α ` β for arbitrary formulas α, β, as well as others [1]. A common misconception related to paraconsistent logics is the confusion between triviality and contradiction. A theory T is trivial when any of the sentences in the language of T can be proven. We say that a theory T is con- tradictory if exists a sentence α in the language of T such that T proves α and ¬α. Finally, a theory T is explosive if and only if T is trivial in the presence of a contradiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface of an Anthology of Universal Logic from Paul Hertz to Dov Gabbay1
    Preface of an Anthology of Universal Logic From Paul Hertz to Dov Gabbay1 This book is a retrospective on universal logic in the 20th century. It gathers papers and book extracts in the spirit of universal logic from 1922 to 1996. Each of the 15 items is presented by a specialist explaining its origin, import and impact, supported by a bibliog- raphy of correlated works. Some of the pieces presented here, such as “Remarques sur les notions fondamentales de la méthodologie des mathématiques” by Alfred Tarski, are for the first time translated into English. Universal logic is a general study of logical structures. The idea is to go beyond par- ticular logical systems to clarify fundamental concepts of logic and to construct general proofs. This methodology is useful to understand the power and limit of a particular given system. Lindström’s theorem is typically a result in this direction: it provides a character- ization of first-order logic. Roughly speaking, Lindström’s theorem states that first-order logic is the strongest logic having both the compactness property and the Löwenheim– Skolem property (see details in Part 10). Such a theorem is concerned not only with first- order logic but with other nearby possible logics. One has to understand what these other possible logics are and be able to compare them with first-order logic. In short: one has to consider a class of logics and relations between them. Lindström’s theorem is a result in favor of first-order logic, but to claim the superiority of this logic one must have the general perspective of an eagle’s eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton Da Costa E a Filosofia Da Quase-Verdade 107 E Eticos, (Ii) Aspectos Epistemol6gicos, 16Gicos E Metodol6gicos, E (Iii) Aspectos Me­ Tafisicos
    NEWTON DA COSTA EA FILOSOFIA DA QUASE-VERDADE DEClO KRAUSE Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Abstract. This paper intends to introduce the three issues of Principia which will appear in a sequel honoring Newton da Costa's 80th birthday. Instead of presenting the papers one by one, as it is common in presentations such as this one, we have left the papers speak by themselves, and instead we have preferred to present to the Brazilian readers, specialty to our students, some aspects of Newton da Costa's conception ofscience and of the scientific activity, grounded on the concept of quasi-truth, which he contributed to develop in a rigorous way. Da Costa is known as one of the founding fathers of paraconsistent logic, but his contributions go also to the foundations of physics, theoretical computation, model theory, algebraic logic, lattice theory, applications of non-classical logics to law and technology, etc. But perhaps his main contribution was to provide a basis for the birth of a school of logic in our country (Brazil), serving as teacher and inspiring new researchers for generations. It is a pleasure to have had so enthusiastic acceptation from the editors of Principia to organize these volumes. I would like to thank the contributors and the editors of Principia, specially Prof. Cezar Mortari for his help in organizing the issue. Keywords: Newton da Costa, quasi-truth, scientific activity, science. Dedicado ao professor Newton da Costa, pelo exemplo. A atividade cientifica euma atividade conceitual na qual busca-se a quase-verdade de uma maneira racional. N. C.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] 052815 JUNE 2015 a BIBLIOGRAPHY
    [email protected] 052815 JUNE 2015 A BIBLIOGRAPHY: JOHN CORCORAN’S PUBLICATIONS ON ARISTOTLE 1972–2015 By John Corcoran Indeed, one of the great strides forward in the modern study of Aristotle’s syllogistic was the realization that it is a system of natural deduction. —Kevin Flannery, SJ [2001, 219]. Corcoran […] has convincingly shown that the best formalization of Aristotle’s reductio ad impossibile is by means of a natural deduction system. —Mario Mignucci [1991, 12]. The most radical opponent of Lukasiewicz is J. Corcoran. —Tadeusz Kwiatkowski [1980, 188]. Contents Abstract I. Articles II. Abstracts III. Books IV. Reviews V. Discussions VI. Alternatives VII. Acknowledgements Abstract This presentation includes a complete bibliography of John Corcoran’s publications relevant to his research on Aristotle’s logic. Sections I, II, III, and IV list 21 articles, 44 abstracts, 3 books, and 11 reviews. It starts with two watershed articles published in 1972: the Philosophy & Phenomenological Research article from Corcoran’s Philadelphia period that antedates his Aristotle studies and the Journal of Symbolic Logic article from his Buffalo period first reporting his original results; it ends with works published in 2015. A few of the items are annotated as listed or with endnotes connecting them with other work and pointing out passages that in- retrospect are seen to be misleading and in a few places erroneous. In addition, Section V, “Discussions”, is a nearly complete secondary bibliography of works describing, interpreting, extending, improving, supporting, and criticizing Corcoran’s work: 8 items published in the 1970s, 23 in the 1980s, 42 in the 1990s, 56 in the 2000s, and 69 in the current decade.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREWORD This Issue of Principia Is the Third Volume of the Proceedings
    doi: 10.5007/1808-1711.2011v15n1p1 FOREWORD This issue of Principia is the third volume of the proceedings of the CLE/AIPS Event — Science, Truth and Consistency, held at the University of Campinas (Unicamp), in Campinas, State of São Paulo, Brazil, during August 23-28, 2009, under the joint sponsorship of the Centre for Logic, Epistemology and the History of Science (CLE) of Unicamp and of the International Academy of Philosophy of Science (AIPS), based in Brussels. The meeting was meant as a tribute to the eightieth birthday of Prof. Dr. Newton Carneiro Affonso da Costa, the pioneer Brazilian researcher in the areas of logic and philosophy of science. The International Academy of Philosophy of Science (AIPS) was officially founded on January 22, 1949 in Brussels, with the aim of promoting the intellectual co- operation of scientists and philosophers of different backgrounds, concerned with the synthesis of science, philosophy and theology, especially at a time when a de- mand for specialization was pressing universities worldwide. Among its founder members were not only scientists concerned with such synthesis, such as Bernays, Beth, Born, Bridge, Carnap, Church, Curry, Destouches, Frank, Gonseth, Heisenberg, Kleene, Kotarbinski, Pauli, Piaget, Poly, Popper, Sierpinski, Schrödinger, Whittaker, Wiener, Yukawa, but scientists creators of innovative new theories such as Einstein (relativity), Bohr (quantum mechanics), de Broglie (wave mechanics), Brower (in- tuitionism) and Fréchet (abstract sets and symmetric spaces). Since its creation, the Academy organized 50 regular meetings in various European countries, in the United States, Mexico and Peru. The Centre for Logic, Epistemology and the History of Science (CLE) at Unicamp, officially established on April 7, 1977, aims at bringing together scientists from the various branches of scientific and philosophical knowledge, having more than a hun- dred members and having promoted more than a hundred medium and large size events.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Logic at the University of Buffalo's Department of Philosophy
    Aristotle’s Logic at the University of Buffalo’s Department of Philosophy La lógica de Aristóteles en el Departamento de Filosofía de la Universidad de Búfalo John Corcoran* University of Buffalo - EE. UU. Abstract We begin with an introductory overview of contributions made by more than twenty scholars associated with the Philosophy Department at the University of Buffalo during the last half-century to our understanding and evaluation of Aristotle’s logic. More well-known developments are merely mentioned in order to make room to focus on issues at the center of attention from the beginning: existential import and, more generally, the analysis of categorical propositions. I include a list of the UB scholars, a list of collaborators and supporters from fellow institutions, a bibliography of relevant publications by UB scholars, and a bibliog- raphy of important related works. Keywords: underlying logic, many-sorted logic, range indicator, sortal variable, quantifier-noun-variable, Buffalo-Cambridge interpretation. Resumen Este artículo inicia con una visión introductoria de las contribuciones realizadas durante la segunda mitad del siglo pasado a nuestra comprensión y evaluación de la lógica de Aristóteles por más de veinte académicos asociados al Departamento de Filosofía de la Universidad de Búfalo. Los desarrollos más conocidos se men- cionan con el objetivo de abrir espacio a temas que desde el principio llamaron nuestra atención: el importe existencial y, de modo más general, el análisis de las proposiciones categóricas. Incluyo una lista de los profesores de la UB, una lis- ta de colaboradores y apoyos de instituciones hermanas, una bibliografía de las publicaciones relevantes de los profesores de la UB, y una bibliografía de trabajos relacionados importantes.
    [Show full text]