DOCSLIB.ORG

Deconstruction a Reader

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deconstruction a Reader DECONSTRUCTION A READER Editor Martin McQuillan ROUTLEDGE NEW YORK CONTENTS Acknowledgements ix A map of this book xii Introduction: Five strategies for deconstruction Martin McQuillan 1 Part 1: Avant la lettre 1.1 Karl Marx: from Capital 47 1.2 Sigmund Freud: 'A note upon the "Mystic Writing Pad"' 51 1.3 Georges Bataille: 'The meaning of general economy' 56 1.4 Walter Benjamin: 'Critique of violence' 62 1.5 Martin Heidegger: 'The task of destroying the history of ontology' 71 1.6 Edmond Jabes: 'The moment after' 80 1.7 PaulValery: 'In praise of water' 88 1.8 Maurice Blanchot: 'Friendship' 91 Part 2: Opening Remarks 2.1 Jacques Derrida: 'A number of yes (Nombre de oui)' 97 Part 3: Philosophy 3.1 Christopher Norris: 'Deconstruction, post-modernism and the visual arts' 109 3.2 Richard Rorty: 'Philosophy as a kind of writing' 121 DECONSTRUCTION: A READER 3.3 Rodolphe Gasche: 'Deconstruction as criticism' 126 3.4 Geoffrey Bennington: 'Genuine Gasche (perhaps)' 134 3.5 Simon Critchley: 'Black Socrates? Questioning the philosophical tradition' 143 3.6 Jean-Francois Lyotard: 'Discussions, or phrasing "After Auschwitz"' 154 Part 4: Literature 4.1 J. Hillis Miller: 'Derrida's topographies' 161 4.2 Paul de Man: 'Autobiography as de-facement' 171 4.3 Derek Attridge: 'Ghostwriting' 175 4.4 Nicholas Royle: 'The phantom review' 178 4.5 Catherine Belsey: 'Hamlet's dilemma' 190 4.6 Peggy Kamuf: 'The ghosts of critique and deconstruction' 198 Part 5: Culture 5.1 Geoffrey Bennington: 'Deconstruction is not what you think' 217 5.2 Andrew Benjamin: 'Derrida, architecture and philosophy' 220 5.3 Bernard Tschumi: 'Violence of architecture' 229 5.4 Richard Beardsworth: 'Thinking technicity' 235 5.5 Avital Ronell: 'Toward a narcoanalysis' 244 5.6 Judith Butler: 'Speech acts politically' 254 5.7 Fred Botting and Scott Wilson: 'Homoeconopoesis 1' 263 CONTENTS Part 6: Sexual difference 6.1 Diane Elam: 'Unnecessary introductions' 275 6.2 Robert Young: 'The same difference' 283 6.3 Barbara Johnson: 'Gender theory and the Yale School' 292 6.4 Rachel Bowlby: 'Domestication' 304 6.5 Alexander Duttmann: 'Recognising the virus' 311 6.6 Helene Cixous: 'What is it o'clock? or The door (we never enter)' 321 Part 7: Psychoanalysis 7.1 Geoffrey Hartman: 'Psychoanalysis: The French connection' 331 7.2 Nicholas Abrahams and Maria Torok: from The Wolf Man's Magic Word 340 7.3 Samuel Weber: 'The sideshow, or: Remarks on a canny moment' 351 7.4 Nicholas Royle: 'The remains of psychoanalysis (i): Telepathy' 361 7.5 David Wills: from Prosthesis 370 Part 8: Politics 8.1 Michael Ryan: 'Marx and Derrida" 379 8.2 Willy Maley: 'Spectres of Engels' 383 8.3 Bill Readings: 'The deconstruction of politics' 388 8.4 Gayatri Spivak: 'Practical politics of the open end' 397 8.5 Ernesto Laclau: 'Why do empty signifiers matter in politics?" 405 8.6 Homi K. Bhabha: 'Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse' 414 VII DECONSTRUCTION: A READER Part 9: Ethics 9.1 Emmanuel Levinas: 'Jacques Derrida: Wholly otherwise' 425 9.2 Robert Bernasconi: 'The trace of Levinas in Derrida' 431 9.3 Drucilla Cornell: 'Post-structuralism, the ethical relation and the law' 443 9.4 Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe: 'In the name of ...' 450 9.5 Jean-Luc Nancy: 'What is to be done?' 456 9.6 John D. Caputo: 'God is not differance' 458 Part 10: The work of mourning 10.1 Jacques Derrida: '(In memorium) Paul de Man' 467 10.2 Jacques Derrida: 'Text read at Louis Althusser's funeral' 471 10.3 Jacques Derrida: 'Adieu: Emmanuel Levinas' 476 10.4 Jacques Derrida: 'I'm going to have to wander all alone: Gilles Deleuze' 485 10.5 Jacques Derrida: 'Friendship-above-all [Amitie-a-tout-romple]: Jean-Francois Lyotard' 489 Part 11: Closing statements 11.1 Jacques Derrida and Pierre Mendes Frances: 'Open letter to Bill Clinton' 493 11.2 Jacques Derrida: 'Telepathy' 496 11.3 Jacques Derrida: 'The deconstruction of actuality: An interview with Jacques Derrida' 527 Bibliography 1: Jacques Derrida 555 Bibliography 2: Key publications of contributing authors 562 Index 574 VIII.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yale University B0082
    U.S. Department of Education Washington, D.C. 20202-5335 APPLICATION FOR GRANTS UNDER THE National Resource Centers and Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellowships CFDA # 84.015A PR/Award # P015A180082 Gramts.gov Tracking#: GRANT12659441 OMB No. , Expiration Date: Closing Date: Jun 25, 2018 PR/Award # P015A180082 **Table of Contents** Form Page 1. Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 e3 2. Standard Budget Sheet (ED 524) e6 3. Assurances Non-Construction Programs (SF 424B) e8 4. Disclosure Of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) e10 5. ED GEPA427 Form e11 Attachment - 1 (1244-GEPA Statement2018) e12 6. Grants.gov Lobbying Form e13 7. Dept of Education Supplemental Information for SF-424 e14 8. ED Abstract Narrative Form e15 Attachment - 1 (1246-CES FLAS Abstract) e16 9. Project Narrative Form e18 Attachment - 1 (1245-CES FLAS Budget Narrative) e19 10. Other Narrative Form e67 Attachment - 1 (1234-InformationToMeetStatutoryRequirements (9)) e68 Attachment - 2 (1235-FLAS Applicant Profile) e71 Attachment - 3 (1236-Acronyms ESC) e72 Attachment - 4 (1237-Bojanowska CV 2018) e74 Attachment - 5 (1238-BIOS ForAPPwithTOC_YaleESC) e85 Attachment - 6 (1239-LetterOfReferenceMinjinHashbat) e244 Attachment - 7 (1240-LetterOfReferenceNellekeVanDeusen-Scholl) e246 Attachment - 8 (1241-LetterOfReferenceConstantineMuravnik) e248 Attachment - 9 (1242-CouncilMemberList) e250 Attachment - 10 (1243-CourseListForAPP_ALLYaleESC) e253 11. Budget Narrative Form e317 Attachment - 1 (1247-Section C Budget Narrative) e318 This application was generated using the PDF functionality. The PDF functionality automatically numbers the pages in this application. Some pages/sections of this application may contain 2 sets of page numbers, one set created by the applicant and the other set created by e-Application's PDF functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Literature Across Continents
    THINKING LIT ER A TURE ACROSS CONTINENTS This page intentionally left blank ranjan ghosh • j. hillis miller THINKING LIT ER A TURE ACROSS CONTINENTS Duke University Press • Durham and London • ​ 2016 © 2016 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of Amer i ca on acid- free paper ∞ Typeset in Chaparral Pro by Westchester Publishing Services Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Ghosh, Ranjan, author. | Miller, J. Hillis (Joseph Hillis), [date] author. Title: Thinking lit er a ture across continents / Ranjan Ghosh, J. Hillis Miller. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2016024761 (print) | lccn 2016025625 (ebook) isbn 9780822361541 (hardcover : alk. paper) isbn 9780822362449 (pbk. : alk. paper) isbn 9780822373698 (e- book) Subjects: lcsh: Liter a ture— Cross- cultural studies. | Liter a ture— Study and teaching—Cross- cultural studies. | Culture in liter a ture. | Liter a ture and transnationalism. | Liter a ture— Philosophy. Classification: lcc pn61 .g46 2016 (print) | lcc pn61 (ebook) | ddc 809— dc23 lc record available at https:// lccn . loc. gov / 2016024761 Cover art: Kate Castelli, The Known Universe (detail), 2013. Woodblock on nineteenth-century book cover. Courtesy of the artist. CONTENTS vii Preface j. hillis miller ix Acknowl edgments ranjan ghosh xi Acknowl edgments j. hillis miller 1 Introduction: Thinking across Continents ranjan ghosh 9 Introduction Continued: The Idiosyncrasy of the Literary Text j. hillis miller PART I: The Matter and Mattering of Lit er a ture 27 Chapter 1. Making Sahitya Matter ranjan ghosh 45 Chapter 2. Lit er a ture Matters Today j. hillis miller PART II: Poem and Poetry 71 Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Architecture 2016–2017 School of Architecture School Of
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut School of Architecture 2016–2017 School of Architecture 2016 –2017 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 112 Number 4 June 30, 2016 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 112 Number 4 June 30, 2016 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 status as a protected veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Kimberly M. Go≠-Crews University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valarie Stanley, Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 3rd Floor, 203.432.0849.
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate School of Arts and Sciences 2001–2002
    Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Programs and Policies 2001–2002 bulletin of yale university Series 97 Number 10 August 20, 2001 Bulletin of Yale University Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, PO Box 208227, New Haven ct 06520-8227 PO Box 208230, New Haven ct 06520-8230 Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut Issued sixteen times a year: one time a year in May, October, and November; two times a year in June and September; three times a year in July; six times a year in August Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer Editor: David J. Baker Editorial and Publishing Office: 175 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut Publication number (usps 078-500) Printed in Canada The closing date for material in this bulletin was June 10, 2001. The University reserves the right to withdraw or modify the courses of instruction or to change the instructors at any time. ©2001 by Yale University. All rights reserved. The material in this bulletin may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form, whether in print or electronic media, without written permission from Yale University. Graduate School Offices Admissions 432.2773; graduate.admissions@yale.edu Alumni Relations 432.1942; julia.downs@yale.edu Dean 432.2733; susan.hockfield@yale.edu Finance and Administration 432.2739; alice.oliver@yale.edu Financial Aid 432.2739; jennifer.brinley@yale.edu General Information Office 432.2770; wanda.velez@yale.edu Graduate Career Services 432.2583; graduate.career.services@yale.edu McDougal Graduate Student Center 432.2583; mcdougal.center@yale.edu Registrar of Arts and Sciences 432.2330 Teaching Fellow Preparation and Development 432.2583; william.rando@yale.edu Teaching Fellow Program 432.2757; judith.hackman@yale.edu Working at Teaching Program 432.1198; watteach@pantheon.yale.edu Internet: www.yale.edu/gradschool Copies of this publication may be obtained from Graduate School Student Services and Reception Office, Yale University, PO Box 208236, New Haven ct 06520-8236.
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereignty and the Event in John D
    Sovereignty and The Event in John D. Caputo’s Radical Theology Calvin Dieter Ullrich Dissertation presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Theology at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof Robert Vosloo April 2019 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third-party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Calvin Dieter Ullrich April 2019 Copyright © 2019 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements To my supervisor, Prof Robert Vosloo, thank you for journeying with me for a second time. Your unwavering support and generous feedback have improved this thesis beyond any effort of my own. I am proud to be among those who can call themselves Voslonians! To my family, thank you for making the many kilometers that separate four continents feel like nothing more than a short walk into the next room. Your precious phone calls are the lifeblood of this thesis. To all the friends who have endured the travails and kept me from falling into the abyss, I am in your debt. To those involved in making my time at the University of Tübingen possible (including the Evangelisches Stift), my sincerest thanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Lost in the Post: (Post-)Structuralism Between France and the United States
    (Post-)structuralism between France and the United States 6 Lost in the post: (Post-)structuralism between France and the United States Edward Baring Introduction Today, the term ‘post-structuralism’ designates a stage in the intellectual history of modern France. According to a familiar narrative, post-war French thought is divided up into a number of moments that can conveni- ently structure an American college course. The great success of existen- tialist ideas in the 1940s, propounded by figures like Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, who emphasized the free and acting subject, was followed by a ‘structuralist’ reaction, when Claude Lévi-Strauss and Roland Barthes foregrounded anonymous structures that transcended and determined the self. Moving on at pace, so the narrative goes, these ideas were challenged by a range of post-structuralists, most prominently Jacques Derrida but also Gilles Deleuze, Luce Irigaray and Julia Kristeva. The ‘post-structuralists’ added a dash of Nietzsche to the staid structuralist mix, which tended to dissolve certainties and unsettle the structures that earlier scholars had described. Despite the attractive simplicity of this narrative, it quickly runs into difficulties. Several figures are hard to place. Are Jacques Lacan and Louis Althusser structuralists or post-structuralists? It is generally assumed that we can distinguish between an early and late Michel Foucault. But in a 1983 interview that is well beyond his putative break with structuralism, Foucault rejected ‘post-structuralist’ as a description of his work.1 Even the archetypal post-structuralist, Jacques Derrida, refused the label.2 To a certain extent, such refusals should be understood as a salutary sus- picion of -isms.
    [Show full text]
  • J. Hillis Miller
    The FirstThe Sail The film-bookThe First Sail: J. Hillis Miller is based on the doc- umentary film by the same name made in 2010. Together with the film transcript and an interview conducted by Taryn Devereux, the essays in this volume have been gathered from several internation- al events devoted to Miller’s works. With contibutions by Henry Suss- man, Sarah Dillon, Charlie Gere, Nicholas Royle, Éamonn Dunne and Michael O’Rourke, Dragan Kujundžić, Julian Wolfreys and J. Hillis Miller. “Very few American literary scholars of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries have displayed the depth and breadth of critical and theoretical expertise and engagement that J. Hillis Miller has shown. His work bridges generations and does so in ways that reflect the key debates and transitions we have witnessed and we participate in. This book, derived from a fine film by Dragan Kujundžić of the same name, gives us a unique and invaluable glimpse into the life of J. Hillis Miller—our understanding of the man’s work acquires a new depth, immediacy, and intimacy.” – David Palumbo-Liu, Stanford University Dragan Kujundžić is a Professor of Jewish, Germanic and Slavic Studies, and Film and Media Studies at the University of Florida. He is the author of numerous articles in critical theory, decon- struction and literary criticism. Film freely available at: https://archive.org/details/TheFirstSail Kujundžić Cover Image: ‘Buddies,’ J. Hillis Miller and The First Sail: J. Hillis Miller J. Hillis Miller Jr. taken at Keuka Lake, NY. a film book OPEN HUMANITIES PRESS Edited by Dragan Kujundžić The First Sail: J.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement, 8 Oct
    SCE REPORTS Richard A. Barney University of Virginia A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF DECONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM What Ihab Hassan has said of criticism in gen- eral seems also true of deconstruction: there are "paracritics, metacritics, cryptocritics, hypocrit- ics, uncanny critics," and countless others who have contributed to the corpus of this new criti- cism (SCER 6, p. 74). Since 1967, when Jacques Derrida first published De la gramatologie, the number of scholars using "deconstruc tive" warrants , with their own variations, has grown at a phenom- enal rate. With this state of affairs in mind, I have chosen to focus this bibliography on eight literary critics who have made important contribu- tions to an American "version" of deconstruction: Roland Barthes, Paul de Man, Jacques Derrida, Eugenio Dona to, Barbara Johnson, J. Hillis Miller, Joseph N. Riddel, and William V. Spanos. Their work is also particularly relevant to the 1980 MLA session of the Society for Critical Exchange. In addition, I have included a limited selection of reviews, articles, and books by scholars who have commented on, critiqued, or challenged their work. Copyright @ 1980 Each of these critics, except perhaps Jacques by Derrida and Barbara Johnson, has shifted from ad- The Society for Critical Exchange, Inc. vocating the tradition of "presence" to endorse and Richard A. Barney. that of "difference" sometime in mid-career . All rights reserved. Therefore I have listed only their work after such The Society for a transition. In France, literary critics began Critical Exchange is a not-for-profit to turn to the deconstructive mode in the mid- corporation for the advancement of co- 1960s, most notably in the collective effort operative research in criticism and The'orie d'ensemble, which appeared in 1968 with articles by Barthes, Derrida, and other important theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Break of Paul De Man
    JARKKO TOIKKANEN The Break of Paul de Man ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Tampere, for public discussion in the Auditorium Pinni B 1096, Kanslerinrinne 1, Tampere, on September 20th, 2008, at 12 o’clock. UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE JARKKO TOIKKANEN The Break of Paul de Man Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1337 Tampere University Press Tampere 2008 ACADEMIC DISSERTATION University of Tampere School of Modern Languages and Translation Studies Finland Distribution Bookshop TAJU Tel. +358 3 3551 6055 P.O. Box 617 Fax +358 3 3551 7685 33014 University of Tampere taju@uta.fi Finland www.uta.fi/taju http://granum.uta.fi Cover design by Juha Siro Layout Sirpa Randell Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1337 Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 752 ISBN 978-951-44-7415-6 (nid.) ISBN 978-951-44-7416-3 (pdf) ISSN 1455-1616 ISSN 1456-954X http://acta.uta.fi Tampereen Yliopistopaino Oy – Juvenes Print Tampere 2008 For a while there is a slight pang. Then it turns away and I go on walking, untroubled in my dreams now. – P. N. Kouta 1997, 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In the four and a half years it has taken me to complete this project, I have enjoyed many privileges, some of which I want to acknowledge here. As nothing is conceived in a void – not even the break of Paul de Man – it is of utmost importance to try to recognise the factors that influence one’s decisions and the elements that endow their making. For without them, either in the academia or elsewhere, even the most valiant attempt to get one’s thoughts out into the open will fail.
    [Show full text]
  • Ve Got a Long Answer’
    ‘You see you ask an innocent question and you’ve got a long answer’ An Interview with J. Hillis Miller Introduction HILLIS MILLER ’S PROFESSIONAL CAREER AS A TEACHER AND SCHOLAR OF LITERATURE, J. philosophy and critical theory has spanned well over fifty years now. He is, according to Edinburgh University Press, ‘the single most significant North American literary critic of the twentieth century’. He has published twenty-seven books and countless articles, edited collections and book chapters. Hillis holds honorary degrees as Doctor of Letters from the University of Florida, Doctor of Humane Letters at Bucknell University, and Doctor Honoris Cause at the University of Zaragoza. He is also Honorary Professor of Peking University and past president of the Modern Language Association. He has taught at The Johns Hopkins University, Yale University and University of California, Irvine. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a member of the American Philosophical Society and currently Distinguished Research Professor of English and Comparative Literature at the University of California, Irvine. On 2 June 2012, Éamonn Dunne and Michael O’Rourke organized a day-long event at the Humanities Institute, University College Dublin, entitled ‘Signing, Sealing, Sailing: The Life and Work of J. Hillis Miller’. 1 The day began with a 1 Michael O’Rourke’s introduction on the day, ‘The Sea Legs of J. Hillis Miller’, can be accessed at: <https://www.academia.edu/1630551/The_Sea_Legs_of_J._Hillis_Miller>. The authors are very grateful for the assistance of John Schad and Arthur Bradley from the University of Lancaster and for the generous and enthusiastic support of Gerardine Miller, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology As Improvisation: Using the Musical Metaphor of Attunement to Think Theologically
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2011 Theology as Improvisation: Using the Musical Metaphor of Attunement to Think Theologically Nathan Crawford Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Crawford, Nathan, "Theology as Improvisation: Using the Musical Metaphor of Attunement to Think Theologically" (2011). Dissertations. 280. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/280 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact ecommons@luc.edu. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2011 Nathan Crawford LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO THEOLOGY AS IMPROVISATION: USING THE MUSICAL METAPHOR OF ATTUNEMENT TO THINK THEOLOGICALLY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN THEOLOGY BY NATHAN CRAWFORD CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 2011 Copyright by Nathan Crawford, 2011 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the large debt that I owe to many who helped make this dissertation possible. To give credit to everyone would be impossible, but let me try to give credit where it is due. First, I would like to thank the Department of Theology at Loyola University of Chicago. The time spent in the department, whether in class, conversation, or over coffee, gave me the resources to be able to complete this project.
    [Show full text]
  • De Man, That Dangerous Supplement
    De Man, That Dangerous Supplement Ziatan Filipovic A dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY English and Comparative Literature Goldsmiths, University of London London,2009 Copyright © Zlatan Filipovic, 2009. 3 Abstract To ask whether Paul de Man still matters is perhaps to have already answered the question. De Man's work, as 1. Hillis Miller writes in a telling irony, "is a violent allergen that provokes fits of coughing, sneezing, and burning eyes, perhaps even worse symptoms, unless it can be neutralized or expelled." There is something inherently resistant in de Man then that goes beyond his wartime journalism. Dust having settled, one must have good reasons today to whip it up and risk another reactive fit. Yet it is precisely this resistance in de Man that will pivot the movement ofthis thesis, as it sneezes and coughs along the way. Relayed through the allergen of terms like deconstruction, unreadability, rhetoric, it will come to remark a trace of something inappropriable, inhuman in texts, which persistently stalks our attempts to be rid of it. It articulates a crisis in the empire of cognition and a disruption of epistemo-aesthetic ideologies that inform our thinking of the political. The thesis plots a narrative that interrogates the relation between the rhetorical, the inhuman and the political, which in de Man comes to activate a new exigency of reading, constantly overtasking received epistemic regimes that integrate dissention to open a passage for the new ones to emerge. What is consistently traced is the measured emptying out of ontology and psychologism from language and its opening to unmasterable linguistic agencies.
    [Show full text]