University of Cincinnati

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Cincinnati UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI DATE: May 8, 2003 I, Stephanie R. Fuentes , hereby submit this as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in: Geology It is entitled: Faunal Distribution across the Ordovician-Silurian boundary in Ohio and Ontario Approved by: Carlton E. Brett Arnold I. Miller Thomas Algeo Steven M. Holland FAUNAL DISTRIBUTION ACROSS THE ORDOVICIAN-SILURIAN BOUNDARY IN OHIO AND ONTARIO A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of Geology of the College of Arts and Sciences 2003 by Stephanie R. Fuentes B.A., SUNY Geneseo, 2001 Committee Chairs: Dr. Carlton E. Brett, Dr. Arnold I. Miller ABSTRACT The Late Ordovician mass extinction is one of the most extensive faunal events in earth history. However, there have been few local analyses on the faunal turnover at this boundary. In addition, it has been suggested that this boundary does not exhibit marked ecologic change. The purpose of this study is to compare faunal distribution from the Upper Ordovician to the Lower Silurian in terms of faunal turnover, ecologic structure, and genus richness. Samples were collected from strata that represent comparable depositional environments, including the Drakes and Brassfield Formations of Ohio, and the Georgian Bay and Cabot Head Formations of Ontario. Multivariate techniques suggest a change in the composition and abundance ratios of taxa across the boundary in the study region. There is no evidence of significant ecologic restructuring across the Ordovician-Silurian boundary and the distribution of some rarefied samples suggests slightly elevated richness in the Silurian. ii iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisors, Carl Brett and Arnie Miller, for their continued encouragement, guidance, and support throughout this project. Their assistance in the field and the lab, as well as their review of this manuscript, provided me with motivation, insight, and ability, without which this research could not have been completed. I would also like to thank committee members Tom Algeo and Steve Holland for their significant contributions to this project. I am very grateful to those who assisted me in the field, including Susie Taha-McLaughlin, Eric Wysong, Alex Bartholomew, Pat McLaughlin, and Mike DeSantis. I am especially grateful to Brian Nicklen for his hard labor, support, and good company in Ontario. I would also like to thank James Bonelli for his continued assistance with statistical analysis. Thanks to my fellow grad students for their encouragement and friendship throughout this program, and also to the department as a whole for providing an intellectually stimulating, cordial working environment. Thanks to my family for their love and guidance throughout my education, particularly during the past two years of my Master’s. This research was funded by the University of Cincinnati Geology Department and the American Museum of Natural History Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………...iv LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………...2 LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………….5 LIST OF APPENDICES………………………………………………………………...6 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………..7 GLOBAL LATE ORDOVICIAN MASS EXTINCTION………………………………12 STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK…………………………………………………...17 METHODS……………………………………………………………………………...38 Date collection………………………………………………………………….38 Date analysis…………………………………………………………………...40 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION……………………………………………………….45 Variations in faunal composition through space and time…………………45 Variations in abundance ratios of key taxa through space and time……..54 Variations in ecologic structure through space and time………………….78 Variations in genus richness through time………………………………….83 CONCLUSIONS……………………………………………………………………….86 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………88 APPENDIX I……………………………………………………………………………93 APPENDIX II………………………………………………………………………….122 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Diagrammatic chart of the four sampled formations……………………….18 2. Map of the study area…………………………………………………………22 3. Stratigraphic column and outcrop photographs of the Drakes Formation, West Union, Ohio…...……………………………………………24 4. Stratigraphic column and photographs of the TST of the Drakes Formation, West Union, Ohio………………………………………………...25 5. Stratigraphic column and outcrop photographs of the Brassfield Formation, West Union, Ohio………………………………………………...27 6. Stratigraphic column and outcrop photographs of the Georgian Bay Formation, Oakville, Ontario………………………………………………….30 7. Photographs of EHST samples from the Georgian Bay Formation, Oakville, Ontario……………...………………………………………………..31 8. Photographs of sedimentary structures in the Cabot Head Formation, Hamilton, Ontario………………………………………………………………33 9. Stratigraphic column and outcrop photographs of the Cabot Head Formation at Chedoke Creek, Hamilton, Ontario…………………………..34 10. Stratigraphic column and outcrop photographs of the Cabot Head Formation at Mountain Brow Drive, Hamilton, Ontario…………………….35 11. Stratigraphic column and outcrop photographs of the Cabot Head Formation at Jolly Cut, Hamilton, Ontario…………………………………..36 12. Cluster analysis dendrogram of presence/absence data per locality……49 2 LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Figure Page 13. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of presence/absence data per locality…………………………………………………………………………..50 14. Cluster analysis dendrogram of presence/absence data per sample…...52 15. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of presence/absence data per sample………………………………………………………………………….53 16. Cluster analysis dendrogram of abundance data per sample with slab-counted data scaled to point count coverage…………………………56 17. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of abundance data per sample with slab-counted data scaled to point count coverage……………………57 18. Cluster analysis dendrogram of abundance data per sample based on equal weight between point and slab counts……………………………59 19. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of abundance data per sample based on equal weight between point and slab counts……………………60 20. Histograms showing average percent abundance of key families per cluster…………………………………………………………………………...64 21. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of abundance data from samples of the Drakes Formation, West Union, Ohio………………………………..66 22. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of abundance data from samples of the Georgian Bay Formation, Oakville, Ontario…………………………69 23. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of abundance data from samples of the Brassfield Formation, West Union, Ohio…………………………….70 3 LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Figure Page 24. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of abundance data from samples of the Cabot Head Formation, Hamilton, Ontario………………………….72 25. Two-dimensional MDS ordination from Ordovician samples……………75 26. Two-dimensional MDS ordination from Silurian samples…………………………………………………………………………77 27. Two-dimensional MDS ordination of samples represented by trophic group…………………………………………………………………...79 28. Histograms showing average percent abundance of key trophic groups per formation…………………………………………………………..82 29. Graphs showings number of genera versus number of specimens for rarefied data……………………………………………………………………84 4 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Common genera categorized by trophic group membership……………..42 2. Number and percent of shared genera between each formation………...46 3. ANOSIM results showing relationships between formations in terms of faunal composition per sample……………………………………………55 4. ANOSIM results showing relationships between formations based on abundance data with equal weight between point and slab counts…..61 5. ANOSIM results showing relationships of formations divided into systems tracts comparing regions within each period……………………..67 6. ANOSIM results showing relationships of formations based on trophic structure………………………………………………………………..80 7. Comparison of the number of genera versus the number of specimens for Ordovician samples, Silurian samples, and each sampled formation………………………………………………………………………..84 5 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Page I. Raw abundance data……………………………………………………...93 II. Locality register…………………………………………………………..122 6 INTRODUCTION As one of the “Big Five” Phanerozoic mass extinctions (Sepkoski, 1995), the global nature of the Late Ordovician event has been studied extensively (e.g. Sheehan, 2001; Sheehan and Coorough, 1990; Sheehan, 1988; Berry, et al., 1995;Tuckey and Anstey, 1992; Berry and Boucot, 1973; Rong and Harper, 1988; Cocks, 1988; Brenchley, 1988; among others). However, in comparison with other mass extinction boundaries, there is a relative lack of research documenting local faunal transitions across the Ordovician-Silurian boundary. Based on qualitative assessment, it has been argued that the Late Ordovician extinction did not result in significant ecologic restructuring on a global scale (Droser et al., 1995, 1997, 2000). However, this concept is difficult to test on a local level, because of the lack of environmentally comparable sections across the boundary. In this context, the purpose of this study is to compare community-level faunal patterns among comparable environments in the pre- extinction versus post-extinction strata across the Ordovician-Silurian boundary. Various studies (e.g. Jablonski, 1998) have shown that local faunal patterns do not necessarily correspond to global trends, and, therefore, alpha- level studies may be of great importance
Recommended publications
  • 3D Ichnofabrics in Shale Gas Reservoirs
    3D ICHNOFABRICS IN SHALE GAS RESERVOIRS By @ Małgorzata Bednarz A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth Sciences Memorial University of Newfoundland October 2014 St. John’s Newfoundland Abstract This PhD research project uses three-dimensional ichnology to address issues of shale- hydrocarbon reservoir quality and provides new tools for ichnofabric analysis and ichnotaxonomic considerations. The study presents deterministic (devoid of conceptual simplifications and interpretations) visualizations of the true spatial geometry of the aff. Chondrites, aff. Phycosiphon and Nereites trace fossils and models the three-dimensional arrangements of the burrow components. The volumetric reconstructions of the real geometry of the trace fossils allowed for their comparison with the previously established visualizations and for reconsideration of pre-existing palaeobiological models. To date three-dimensional understanding of the majority of trace fossils is presented as conceptual drawings available only on two-dimensional media. Such reconstructions are extrapolated mainly from observations of cross sections of burrows from core and outcrop and do not allow for realistic volumetric quantification and full elucidation of complex trace fossil geometries in the context of the host-sediment. The new methodology based on precise serial grinding and volume-visualization presented herein addresses this gap in ichnological knowledge, and is especially useful for examination of the ichnofabric contained in mudstones and muddy siltstones where the application or non-destructive methods of 3D reconstructions as CT scanning or MRI is impossible owing to the rock petrological characteristics (e.g., low burrow-matrix density difference).
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Bioturbation and Trace Fossils in Deep Sea Sediments of the Walvis Ridge, Southeastern Atlantic, Leg 741
    12. BIOTURBATION AND TRACE FOSSILS IN DEEP SEA SEDIMENTS OF THE WALVIS RIDGE, SOUTHEASTERN ATLANTIC, LEG 741 Dieter K. Fütterer, Geologisch-Palàontologisches Institut der Universitàt Kiel, D-2300 Kiel, Federal Republic of Germany ABSTRACT Trace fossil distribution present in pelagic carbonates cored on the Walvis Ridge during Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 74 are described. A characteristic deep-sea trace fossil assemblage comprising the cosmopolitan ichnogenera Planolites, Chondrites, Zoophycos, and Teichichnus was found at paleo-water-depths ranging from a few hundred to about 4500 m. Paleodepth distribution indicates that Zoophycos has changed its environmental preference from relatively shallow water in the Cretaceous into deeper water in the late Paleocene. Thus Zoophycos can be used as a paleodepth indicator in the bathyal environment if its stratigraphic age is known. INTRODUCTION Cretaceous age. Normal subsidence of the Walvis Ridge produced paleodepth core profiles passing from rela- Bioturbation is the churning, stirring, and reworking tively shallow initial paleo-water-depths continuously to of a sediment by bottom-dwelling benthic organisms. In their present-day positions, which are in some cases most cases it obliterates primary sedimentary structures 2000 m deeper. and thus any information on the environmental con- Continuous coring by the hydraulic piston corer ditions during sedimentation. Increasing bioturbation (HPC) produced very good recovery and only minor eventually results in a nearly complete homogenization drilling disturbance in the unconsolidated sediments. of the sediment. These prerequisites offered an ideal opportunity to col- However, distinctly shaped sedimentary features pro- lect continuous data on the distribution of trace fossils duced by the activity of bottom-dwelling organisms through time and to relate those data to systematic (known as trace fossils, ichnofossils, or lebensspuren) changes in water depths in the open ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch
    International Geoscience Programme Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett – Kyle R. Hartshorn – Allison L. Young – Cameron E. Schwalbach – Alycia L. Stigall International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - 2018 - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Kyle R. Hartshorn Dry Dredgers, 6473 Jayfield Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, USA ([email protected]) Allison L. Young Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Cameron E. Schwalbach 1099 Clough Pike, Batavia, OH 45103, USA ([email protected]) Alycia L. Stigall Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Lab, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our thanks to the many colleagues and students who have aided us in our field work, discussions, and publications, including Chris Aucoin, Ben Dattilo, Brad Deline, Rebecca Freeman, Steve Holland, T.J. Malgieri, Pat McLaughlin, Charles Mitchell, Tim Paton, Alex Ries, Tom Schramm, and James Thomka. No less gratitude goes to the many local collectors, amateurs in name only: Jack Kallmeyer, Tom Bantel, Don Bissett, Dan Cooper, Stephen Felton, Ron Fine, Rich Fuchs, Bill Heimbrock, Jerry Rush, and dozens of other Dry Dredgers. We are also grateful to David Meyer and Arnie Miller for insightful discussions of the Cincinnatian, and to Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Publications and Presentations 2010-11
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS JULY 1, 2010 – JUNE 30, 2011 Table of Contents Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences………………………………….. Page 3 School of Architecture…………………………………... Page 125 Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences…………………. Page 133 Walton College of Business……………………………... Page 253 College of Education and Health Professions…………… Page 270 College of Engineering…………………………………... Page 301 School of Law……………………………………………. Page 365 University Libraries……………………………………… Page 375 BUMPERS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND LIFE SCIENCES Agricultural Economic and Agribusiness Alviola IV, P. A., and O. Capps, Jr. 2010 “Household Demand Analysis of Organic and Conventional Fluid Milk in the United States Based on the 2004 Nielsen Homescan Panel.” Agribusiness: an International Journal 26(3):369-388. Chang, Hung-Hao and Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr. 2010. “Childhood Obesity and Unhappiness: The Influence of Soft Drinks and Fast Food Consumption.” J Happiness Stud 11:261–275. DOI 10.1007/s10902-009-9139-4 Das, Biswa R., and Daniel V. Rainey. 2010. "Agritourism in the Arkansas Delta Byways: Assessing the Economic Impacts." International Journal of Tourism Research 12(3): 265-280. Dixon, Bruce L., Bruce L. Ahrendsen, Aiko O. Landerito, Sandra J. Hamm, and Diana M. Danforth. 2010. “Determinants of FSA Direct Loan Borrowers’ Financial Improvement and Loan Servicing Actions.” Journal of Agribusiness 28,2 (Fall):131-149. Drichoutis, Andreas C., Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., Panagiotis Lazaridis. 2010. “Do Reference Values Matter? Some Notes and Extensions on ‘‘Income and Happiness Across Europe.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31:479–486. Flanders, Archie and Eric J. Wailes. 2010. “ECONOMICS AND MARKETING: Comparison of ACRE and DCP Programs with Simulation Analysis of Arkansas Delta Cotton and Rotation Crops.” The Journal of Cotton Science 14:26–33.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey
    Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, By GEORGE V. COHEE, ROBERT G. BATES, and WILNA B. WRIGHT CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1294-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 35 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Listing of nomenclatural changes- --- ----- - - ---- -- -- -- ------ --- Ortega Quartzite and the Big Rock and Jawbone Conglomerate Members of the Kiawa Mountain Formation, Tusas Mountains, New Mexico, by Fred Barker---------------------------------------------------- Reasons for abandonment of the Portage Group, by Wallace de Witt, Jr-- Tlevak Basalt, west coast of Prince of Wales Island, southeastern Alaska, by G. Donald Eberlein and Michael Churkin, Jr Formations of the Bisbee Group, Empire Mountains quadrangle, Pima County, Arizona, by Tommy L. Finnell---------------------------- Glance Conglomerate- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Willow Canyon Formation ....................................... Apache Canyon Formation-- ................................... Shellenberger Canyon Formation- - --__----- ---- -- -- -- ----------- Turney Ranch Formation---- ------- ------ -- -- -- ---- ------ ----- Age--_------------------------------------------------------- Pantano Formation, by Tommy L. Finnell----------_-----------------
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorite Flux to Earth in the Early Cretaceous As Reconstructed from Sediment-Dispersed Extraterrestrial Spinels
    Meteorite flux to Earth in the Early Cretaceous as reconstructed from sediment-dispersed extraterrestrial spinels Birger Schmitz1,2*, Philipp R. Heck2, Walter Alvarez3,4, Noriko T. Kita5, Surya S. Rout2, Anders Cronholm1, Céline Defouilloy5, Ellinor Martin1, Jan Smit4,6, and Fredrik Terfelt1 1Astrogeobiology Laboratory, Department of Physics, Lund University, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden 2Robert A. Pritzker Center for Meteoritics and Polar Studies, The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA 3Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 4Osservatorio Geologico di Coldigioco, Contrada Coldigioco 4, 62021 Apiro, Italy 5WiscSIMS, Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA 6Department of Sedimentary Geology, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands ABSTRACT to 470 ± 6 Ma (Korochantseva et al., 2007), but the most precise relative We show that Earth’s sedimentary strata can provide a record of date is given by an abrupt two-orders-of magnitude increase worldwide the collisional evolution of the asteroid belt. From 1652 kg of pelagic in sand-sized L-chondritic chromite grains in mid-Ordovician sediments Maiolica limestone of Berriasian–Hauterivian age from Italy, we (Schmitz et al., 2003; Heck et al., 2016). recovered 108 extraterrestrial spinel grains (32–250 μm) represent- By dissolving 100-kg-sized samples of condensed sediments from ing relict minerals from coarse micrometeorites. Elemental and three different time periods in various acids, the highly refractory extraterres- oxygen isotope analyses were used to characterize the grains, provid- trial spinel minerals can be concentrated. The recovered grains typically ing a first-order estimate of the major types of asteroids delivering contain high concentrations of solar-wind noble gases, indicating that material at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip Guide to the Upper Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation and Cenozoic Rocks of Southern Oregon and Northern California Field
    Field Trip Guide to the Upper Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation and Cenozoic Rocks of southern Oregon and northern California Students in SOU’s field geology course examining sandstones of the Rocky Gulch Member of the Hornbrook Formation near Hilt, California. Field Trip Leader: Bill Elliott Department of Geology, Southern Oregon University Saturday, September 8, 2007 Introduction The Klamath Mountains are an elongated north-trending geological province that occupies approximately 19,000 km2 in southwestern Oregon and northern California. The Klamath Mountains are made-up of numerous terranes that accreted during the Antler (Devonian), Sonoman (Permian to Late Triassic), and Nevadan (Jurassic to Early Cretaceous) orogenies (Mortimer, 1984). These terranes have been grouped into four metamorphic belts, from oldest (east) to youngest (west): Eastern Klamath Belt; Central Metamorphic; Western Paleozoic and Triassic; and Western Jurassic (Irwin, 1966; Irwin, 1994). In the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, numerous magma bodies intruded the Klamath Mountains, including the Jurassic Mt. Ashland pluton and Early Cretaceous Grants Pass pluton (Hotz 1971; Gribble et al., 1990). During the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, a subduction zone complex and forearc basin developed along the western margin of North America while folding and thrusting of Paleozoic and lower Mesozoic rocks associated with the Sevier orogeny triggered the formation of the Cordilleran foreland basin in the interior of North America (Figs. 1 and 2). The Hornbrook Formation (Upper Cretaceous) consists of a sequence of dominantly marine clastic sedimentary rocks about 1,200 meters thick exposed along the northeastern margin of the Klamath Mountains in southwestern Oregon to northern California (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichnological Analysis of the Bidart and Sopelana Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/Pg) Boundary Sections (Basque Basin, W Pyrenees): Refining Eco-Sedimentary Environment
    Sedimentary Geology 234 (2011) 42–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Sedimentary Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sedgeo Ichnological analysis of the Bidart and Sopelana Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/Pg) boundary sections (Basque Basin, W Pyrenees): Refining eco-sedimentary environment F.J. Rodríguez-Tovar a,⁎, A. Uchman b, X. Orue-Etxebarria c, E. Apellaniz c, Juan I. Baceta c a Departamento de Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, 18002 Granada, Spain b Jagiellonian University, Institute of Geological Sciences, Oleandry Str. 2a, PL-30-063 Kraków, Poland c Departamento de Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad del País Vasco, E-48080 Bilbao, Spain article info abstract Article history: Ichnological analysis of two Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary sections at Bidart (SE France) and Sopelana (N Received 12 August 2010 Spain) has been conducted in order to refining eco-sedimentary environment, and to a make comparison with Received in revised form 23 October 2010 previous interpretations based on microfossils. In both sections, trace fossil assemblage is low diverse, Accepted 22 November 2010 consisting of Chondrites, Planolites, Thalassinoides, Trichichnus, Zoophycos, and ?Phycosiphon, ascribed to the Available online 1 December 2010 Zoophycos ichnofacies, however, with distinct differences. In the Bidart section, early Danian dark-filled trace Editor: M.R. Bennett fossil assemblage is more abundant in large Thalassinoides, Zoophycos and larger Chondrites, and less abundant in Trichichnus and small Chondrites in comparison to the Sopelana section. Sopelana is thus interpreted as a Keywords: more offshore, deeper section than Bidart although both were located in the upper bathyal zone of the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Ohio—The Ordovician
    A Quarterly Publication of the Division of Geological Survey Fall 1997 THE GEOLOGY OF OHIO—THE ORDOVICIAN by Michael C. Hansen o geologists, the Ordovician System of Ohio bulge), accompanying development of a foreland is probably the most famous of the state’s basin to the east at the edge of the orogenic belt. As Paleozoic rock systems. The alternating shales the Taconic Orogeny reached its zenith in the Late Tand limestones of the upper part of this system crop Ordovician, sediments eroded from the rising out in southwestern Ohio in the Cincinnati region mountains were carried westward, forming a com- and yield an incredible abundance and diversity of plex delta system that discharged mud into the well-preserved fossils. Representatives of this fauna shallow seas that covered Ohio and adjacent areas. reside in museums and private collections through- The development of this delta, the Queenston Delta, out the world. Indeed, fossils from Ohio’s Ordovi- is recorded by the many beds of shale in Upper cian rocks define life of this geologic period, and the Ordovician rocks exposed in southwestern Ohio. rocks of this region, the Cincinnatian Series, serve The island arcs associated with continental as the North American Upper Ordovician Standard. collision were the sites of active volcanoes, as docu- Furthermore, in the late 1800’s, Ordovician rocks in mented by the widespread beds of volcanic ash the subsurface in northwestern Ohio were the source preserved in Ohio’s Ordovician rocks (see Ohio of the first giant oil and gas field in the country. Geology, Summer/Fall 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • A Delayed Response of the Trace Fossil Community at the Cretaceous
    Geobios 48 (2015) 137–145 Available online at ScienceDirect www.sciencedirect.com Original article A delayed response of the trace fossil community at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in the Bottaccione section, § Gubbio, Central Italy a, b c Paolo Monaco *, Francisco J. Rodrı´guez-Tovar , Alfred Uchman a Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, Universita` degli Studi di Perugia, via G. Pascoli snc, 06123 Perugia, Italy b Departamento de Estratigrafı´a y Paleontologı´a, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, 18002 Granada, Spain c Jagiellonian University, Institute of Geological Sciences, Oleandry Street 2a, 30-063 Krako´w, Poland A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: A bed-by-bed ichnological analysis at the classic Bottaccione section (Gubbio area, Italy), reveals an Received 11 June 2014 unusual response of ichnofauna to the environmental changes associated with the Cretaceous-Paleogene Accepted 3 February 2015 (K-Pg) boundary event. The trace fossil assemblage, consisting of Chondrites isp., Planolites isp., Available online 23 February 2015 Thalassinoides isp., Trichichnus isp., and Zoophycos isp., is similar to that registered during Cenomanian and Turonian times, showing persistence of the same community for a long time interval in deep-sea Keywords: carbonate deposits. Absence of significant changes through the K-Pg boundary confirms that the Ichnology extinction did not touch the ichnofauna. The decline of trace fossils occurs at 6 cm above the K-Pg Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary boundary, with the total absence of biogenic structures in a 3 cm-thick layer showing parallel Bottaccione Apennines laminations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stratigraphy and Depositional Setting of the Spencer
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Linda J. Baker for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on March 3, 1988. Title: The Stratigraphy and Depositional Setting of the Spencer Formation, West-central Willamette Valley, Oregon; a Surface-subsurface Analysis Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Dr. Kieth F. Oles The late Eocene Spencer Formation crops out in the low hills on the western edge of the central Willamette Valley, Oregon.Surface exposures in eastern Benton and southeastern Polk Counties and oil/gas well records and cuttings in Polk, Marion and Linn Counties were studied to determine Spencer stratigraphy, regional lithologic variations, and depositional environment. Methods used include: study of outcrops, petrography, texture, and well cuttings, as well as the correlation of well logs and microfossil data of McKeel (1984, 1985). The distribution of the underlying early-late Eocene Yamhill Formation is also briefly considered. The Yamhill Formation consists of the Miller sandstone member enclosed between mudstones. The lower and middle Yamhill record shoaling from bathyal to marginal marine depths, and they are overlain by bathyal upper Yamhill mudstones. The Miller sandstone is lens-shaped, trends parallel to the Corvallis fault, and reaches a maximum thickness of approximately 2,000 feet on the east side of the fault. The Miller sandstone grades westward into bathyal mudstones, and eastward into volcanic tuffs and flows. Thinning of the Miller sandstone and upper Yamhill mudstone along the Corvallis fault suggests movement during early late Eocene. The absence of Yamhill strata along the outcrop belt to the southwest may be related to this tectonic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Compile-1.FH9
    Adapted from published geologic quadrangle maps ROCK UNITS TIME UNITS GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE Gravel Geologic Time Scale adapted from American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Stratigraphic Correlation Charts for Northern Appalachian and FORMATION, Crossbedded Midwestern Basin and Arches MEMBER, or BED sandstone Regions. PERIOD 3 million years Sandstone or sand Sandstone and shale Alluvium interbedded Interbedded shale and sandstone QUATERNARY Glacial deposits Shale and minor sandstone 3 million years Drift The following geologic units are absent because of either nondepos- tion or erosion: Tertiary, Cretaceous, Jurassic, Triassic, Permian, and part Silty shale of the Pennsylvanian. 320 million years Flint clay Carbonaceous shale Formations Lee and Breaathitt Clay shale PENNSYLVANIAN Olive Hill Clay Bed 330 million years Dolomitic shale Newman Limestone Interbedded shale and Nada Member limestone; shale dominant Interbedded limestone Cowbell Member and shale Interbedded limestone Nancy Member and shale; limestone dominant Borden Formation Farmers Member Nodular-bedded MISSISSIPPIAN limestone, minor shale Henley Shale Bed Cherty limestone Sunbury Shale Dolomitic limestone ? Berea Sandstone Silty to sandy dolomite Bedford Shale Soft-sediment deformation 365 million years DEVONIAN Unconformity Ohio Shale 415 million years Bisher Dolomite 420 million years Crab Orchard Formation SILURIAN Brassfield Formation 425 million years Drakes Formation Bull Fork Formation Grant Lake Limestone Fairview Formation ORDOVICIAN Upper Part of Ordovician Kope Formation Point Pleasant Tongue of Clays Ferry Formation Figure 3. Stratigraphy of rock units along the AA Highway and U.S. 23. 9.
    [Show full text]