DOCSLIB.ORG

Carry out Mensuration and Calculations WEEK 5-8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carry out Mensuration and Calculations WEEK 5-8 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education PUBLIC TECHNICAL-VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOLS PUBLIC TECHNICAL-VOCATIONAL Learning Outcome 2: Carry out Mensuration and Calculations WEEK 5-8 8 Unit of Competency: Perform Mensuration and Calculation Module No.: 1 Module Title: Performing Mensuration and Calculation 0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Program/Course: FURNITURE MAKING NC II Unit of Competency: PERFORM MENSURATION AND CALCULATIONS Module Title: Performing Mensuration and Calculations Learning Outcome 2: Carry out Mensuration and Calculations ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1. Calculations needed to complete work task are performed using the form basic process of addition ( + ), subtraction ( - ), multiplication (x), and division (÷) including, but not limited to: trigonometric, functional, algebraic computations. 2. Calculations involving fraction percentages and mixed numbers are used to complete work/task. 3. Numerical computations are self -checked and corrected for accuracy. 4. Accurate measurements are obtained. 5. System of measurement is identified and converted according to job requirements. 6. Work pieces are measured according to job requirements. References: 1. Cabinet Making and Millwork, Second Edition, John L. Feirer 2. Exploring Woodworking, Fundamentals of Technology, B. Fred W. Zimmerman and Larry J. Mc Ward 3. Handicrafts Handbook, 1975, Tomas M. Quilang 4. Reader’s Digest Book of Skills and Tools 5. Working with Wood, 1982, Gilbert Hutching, Eugene Martin and Mario Coleman 6. Wood Technology and Processes, John L. Feirer 7. Fundamental Woodworking, 1976, Gregorio T. Amano 1 LEARNING EXPERIENCES/ACTIVITIES Learning Outcome 2: Carry-out Mensuration and Calculation Learning Activities Special Instructions 1. Read the attached information sheet No. 2.1 on System of measurements 2. Answer Self Check No. 2.1 3. Read Information Sheet No. 2.2 Refer the illustration given to an on reading of measurements. actual measuring tool. 4. Answer Self-Check No.2.2 5. Read Operation Sheet No. 2.1 on converting fraction to decimal. 6. Answer Self-Check No. 2.3 on Refer your answer in every self- Let your teacher check your check to respective answer keys answer sheet. 7. Read Information Sheet No. 2.3 on Conversion of linear measurements. 8. Answer Self-Check No. 2.4 9. Read information sheet 2.4 on taking dimensions 10. Answer Self-Check 2.5 11. Read information sheet no.2.5 on calculating board foot of lumber 12. Solve for self-check 2.6 Let your teacher check your computation 2 INFORMATION SHEET 2.1 SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENTS The 2 systems of measurements are: the English and the Metric Systems. The English system originated in England and also known as the U.S. customary system of measurement while the Metric System was developed in France and also known as the S. I. (International Standard). ( UNIT OF MEASURES ) LINEAR MEASUREMENT ENGLISH METRIC Yard ( yd ) Meter Foot ( ft ) / („ ) decimeter 1/10 meter Inch (in. ) / (“ ) centimeter 1/ 100 meter Millimeter 1 / 1000 meter SELF-CHECK 2.1 Directions: Enumerate the ff. 1-2 – 2 systems of measurements 3-5 - Give at least 3 units of linear measurements in the English system 6-9 – Give at least 3 units of linear measurements in the Metric System 3 INFORMATION SHEET 2.2 READING OF MEASUREMENTS A. Reading the inch: The inch is divided into segments called graduations. Each graduation represents a measurement in form of a proper fraction. The inch can be divided into 16, 8,4 and 2, equal parts. 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 1 1 1 1 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1 3 5 7 1 1 1 3 8 8 1 8 8 1 4 4 8 1 0 2 1 4 Note : The illustration is not the actual length of an inch. B. Reading the centimeter and centimeter mm mm mm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 20 30 0 1 2 3 cm cm cm 4 SELF-CHECK 2.2 Direction: Read the following measurements. 1 – 5. 2 5 1 3 4 0 1 2 6 – 10 7 6 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 6. cm 7. mm 8. mm 9. mm 10. cm 5 6 OPERATION SHEET 2.1 CONVERTING FRACTION TO DECIMALS In converting fractions to decimals, divide the numerator by its denominator whether it is proper, improper or mixed fraction. Sample Solutions 1. Proper Fraction 2/5 = 0.4 0.4 5 2.0 0 20 20 0 2. Improper Fraction 11/3 = 3.66 3.66 3 11.00 9 20 18 20 18 2 3. Mixed Fraction 2 1 = 2.5 2 0.5 2 2 1.0 1.0 0 7 SELF-CHECK 2.3 Directions: Convert the following fractions into decimals. 1. 1/4 2. 3/4 3. 5/8 4. 7/8 5. 9/16 6. 11/5 7. 13/4 8. 9/5 9. 6 3/5 10. 3 2/3 INFORMATION SHEET 2.3 CONVERTING UNITS OF MEASURE GUIDE TABLE IN UNIT CONVERSION English to English Metric to Metric 1foot = 12 inches 1 meter = 10 decimeter 1 dm = 10 centimeter 1 cm = 10 millimeter English to Metric Metric to English 1 inch = 2.54 cm 1 meter = 3.28 feet 1 inch = 25.4 mm 1 meter = 39.37 inches 1 foot = 30.48 cm Sample Solutions in Conversion A. Foot to inches 3 ft = inches Solution : Multiply 3ft by 12 inches / ft = 36 inches B. Inch to feet 48 inches = Feet 8 Solution: Divide 48 inches by 12 inches / feet = 4feet C. Centimeter to millimeter 22 cm = millimeters Solution: Multiply 22 cm by 10 mm / cm = 220mm D. Inch to centimeter 6 inches = centimeter Solution : Multiply 6 inches by 2.54 cm / inch = 15.24 cm SELF-CHECK 2.4 Directions: Convert the following measurement into their unit equivalents . 1. 4 meter = cm. 2. 4 meter = ft. 3. 8 feet = inches 4. 20 inches = cm 5. 236.22 inches = meters INFORMATION SHEET 2.4 TAKING DIMENSIONS Ways of taking dimension 1. Measure end to end of stock. 9 2. Measure edge to edge 3. Measure outside diameter of a cylindrical object. 4. Measure inside diameter 5. Lay-out width. 10 SELF-CHECK 2.5 Directions: Identify the different ways of taking dimensions. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 11 INFORMATION SHEET 2.5 CALCULATING BOARDFOOT OF LUMBER Although the International System (SI) or Metric System already had and superseded the English System of measure, the board foot as a unit of measure for determining the volume of lumber is still being used by the furniture & cabinet making and construction industry. This is because lumbers are sold in terms of board foot. A board foot is actually one square foot of lumber of one inch thick 1 foot 1 foot or 12” 1 inch A board Foot The formula used in computing board foot is: Board foot (Bd.Ft.) = T x W x L 12 Where: T = Thickness in inches W= Width in inches L = Length in feet Note: This formula is being used for saved wood of commercial dimension. Example: Compute the board foot of lumber whose dimension is 2” x 4 “ x 12” Steps 1. Identify the given data Given. T = 2” W = 4” L = 12‟ 12 Step 2 : Determine what is being asked Find the Bd. Ft. = ? Step 3 State the formula Formula: Bd.Ft. = T x W x L 12 Step 4. Substitute the given data in the formula, then solve. Solution: Bd.Ft. = T x W x L 12 = 2” x 4” x 12 “ 12 = 96 12 = 8 Bd.Ft. SELF-CHECK 2.6 Directions: Compute the number of board feet of the following dimensions. 1. 2” x 6” x 12‟ 2. 3” x 4” x 10‟ 3. 2” x 2” x 16‟ 13 ANSWER KEY 2.1 1. English System 2. Metric System 3. Inch 4. Foot 5. Yard 6. millimeter 7. centimeter 8. decimeter 9. meter ANSWER KEY 2.2 1. 3/8” 2. 13/16” 3. 1 ¼ 4. 1 ½ 5. 1 11/16 6. 2 cm 7. 15 mm 8. 28 mm 9. 36 mm 10. 4 cm ANSWER KEY 2.3 1. .25 2. .75 3. .625 4. .875 5. .563 6. 2.2 7. 3.25 8. 1.8 9. 6.6 10.3.67 14 ANSWER KEY 2.4 1. 400cm 2. 13.12 ft. 3. 96 inches 4. 50.8 6. 6 meters ANSWER KEY 2.5 1. Measure end to end of stock. 2. Measure edge to edge. 3. Measure outside diameter of a cylindrical object 4. Measure inside diameter of a circular object. 5. layout- out width ANSWER KEY 2.6 1. 12 Bd.Ft. 2. 10 Bd.Ft. 3. 5.33 Bd. Ft. i 15 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calculating Board Feet Board Feet Linear Feet Z "Board Feet" Is a Measurement of Lumber Square Feet Volume
    Calculating Board Feet board Feet linear feet z "Board Feet" is a measurement of lumber square feet volume. z A board foot is equal to 144 cubic inches of wood. TED 126 Spring 2007 z Actually it's easy to calculate using the following formula: Bd. Ft. = T (inches) x W (inches) x L (feet) / 12 2 Board Feet Board Feet z When you are figuring up board feet, keep in mind a waste factor. Bd. Ft. = T (inches) x W (inches) x L (feet) / 12 z If you purchase good clear material add about 15% for waste, Bd. Ft. = T (inches) x W (inches) x L (inches) / 144 z if you elect to use lower grade material you will have to allow for defects and more wasted material ---add about 30%. 3 4 Board Feet and Linear feet Board Feet and Linear feet z A linear foot is a measure of length 12 inches z To convert linear feet to board feet: long and a Thickness” x Width” x Length’ ÷ 12 z board foot is a number calculated by determining the volume of a board that is 12 z To convert board feet to linear feet: inches wide and 1 inch thick. • In other words, a 1" x 6" board that measures 24" 12 ÷ Thickness” x Width” x Board Foot long is exactly one board foot. (width" x thickness" x length' / 12) 5 6 1 Linear feet and Square Feet The math…. z It is not possible to convert linear footage into z A Linear Feet is just a measurement of square footage because a linear foot is only one length and does not take into account its dimension and a square foot is two dimensions, width or thickness.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis of a Small Log Sawmill in Southeast Alaska
    1 Feasibility analysis of a small log sawmill in Southeast Alaska Executive Summary Unlike most Southern Yellow Pine sawmills, a small log mill in Southeast Alaska that manufactured lumber from 60-year old trees, would not be profitable. There are many additional operating costs in the remote forests of Southeast Alaska that the Southern Yellow Pine sawmills do not incur. The two most costly disadvantages are; 1. An additional $SO per thousand board feet of lumber that is required to transport lumber from Southeast Alaska to the Pacific Northwest and, 2. The lack ofany reasonable economy of scale. The small timber sale volume projected to be available to the manufacturing industry in Southeast Alaska is inadequate to support more than a single mid-size sawmill. Consequently the regions sawmills will not produce any income from the residual products - chips, sawdust and bark. The chips are currently barged to pulp mills in the Pacific Northwest and Canada, while the Yellow Pine sawmills can deliver chips to nearby pulp mills at a much lower cost than the Alaska sawmills. Similarly, there are no fiberboard plants to utilize the sawdust from Southeast Alaska sawmills and there is no market for the bark in Southeast Alaska. Instead, most ofthe sawdust and bark must be disposed of in landfills. Introduction The purpose of this analysis is to compare several financial estimates of the feasibility of manufacturing lumber from immature young growth timber in Southeast Alaska. Four sawmill proformas are 1 examined : 1. A summary of five actual Southern Yellow Pine sawmills. This proforma was used because much of the rhetoric surrounding the Secretary of Agriculture unilateral decision to transition to 60+ year old Alaska young growth was based on assertions that Yellow Pine sawmills harvest their 2 timber before age 60 • Other than the obvious difference in tree species, the yellow pine region has much different logistic issues than Southeast Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Forestry Measurements Acre: a Unit of Area Equaling 43,560
    Useful Forestry Measurements Acre: A unit of area equaling 43,560 square feet or 10 square chains. Basal Area: The area, usually in square feet, of the cross-section of a tree stem near its base, generally at breast height and inclusive of bark. The basal area per acre measurement gives you some idea of crowding of trees in a stand. Board Foot: A unit of area for measuring lumber equaling 12 inches by 12 inches by 1 inch. Chain: A unit of length. A surveyor’s chain equals 66 feet or 1/80-mile. Cord: A pile of stacked wood measuring 4 feet by 4 feet by 8 feet when originally conceived. Cubic Foot: A unit of volume measure, wood equivalent to a solid cube that measures 12 inches by 12 inches by 12 inches or 1,728 cubic inches. Cunit: A volume of wood measuring 3 feet and 1-1/2 inches by 4 feet by 8 feet and containing 100 solid cubic feet of wood. D.B.H. (diameter breast height): The measurement of a tree’s diameter at 4-1/2 feet above the ground line. M.B.F. (thousand board feet): A unit of measure containing 1,000 board feet. Section: A unit of area containing 640 acres or one square mile. Square Foot: A unit of area equaling 144 square inches. Township: A unit of land area covering 23,040 acres or 36 sections. Equations Cords per acre (based on 10 Basal Area Factor (BAF) angle gauge) (# of 8 ft sticks + # of trees)/(2 x # plots) Based on 10 Basal Area Factor Angle Gauge Example: (217+30)/(2 x 5) = 24.7 cords/acre BF per acre ((# of 8 ft logs + # of trees)/(2 x # plots)) x 500 Bd ft Example: (((150x2)+30)/(2x5))x500 = 9000 BF/acre or
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Board Foot to Cubic Foot Ratio
    United States Department of Agriculture Estimating the Forest Service Forest Board Foot to Products Laboratory Cubic Foot Ratio Research Paper FPL-RP-616 Steve Verrill Victoria L. Herian Henry Spelter Abstract Contents Certain issues in recent softwood lumber trade negotiations Page have centered on the method for converting estimates of 1 Introduction .................................................................... 1 timber volumes reported in cubic meters to board feet. Such conversions depend on many factors; three of the most im- 2 The F3 × F2 × F1 Model.................................................. 2 portant of these are log length, diameter, and taper. Average log diameters vary by region and have declined in the west- 3 The F1 Factor.................................................................. 2 ern United States due to the growing scarcity of large diame- ter, old-growth trees. Such a systematic reduction in size in 4 F3 × F2............................................................................. 3 the log population affects volume conversions from cubic units to board feet, which makes traditional rule of thumb 5 Applying the F3 × F2 × F1 Model to a Population conversion factors antiquated. In this paper we present an of West Coast Logs ........................................................ 3 improved empirical method for performing cubic volume to board foot conversions. 6 Smoothing the F3 × F2 Surface....................................... 4 Keywords: Scribner scaling, diameter, length, taper, 7 Optimal Smoothing
    [Show full text]
  • California Assessment of Wood Business Innovation Opportunities and Markets (CAWBIOM)
    California Assessment of Wood Business Innovation Opportunities and Markets (CAWBIOM) Phase I Report: Initial Screening of Potential Business Opportunities Completed for: The National Forest Foundation June 2015 CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT OF WOOD BUSINESS INNOVATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MARKETS (CAWBIOM) PHASE 1 REPORT: INITIAL SCREENING OF POTENTIAL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES PHASE 1 REPORT JUNE 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Interim Report – brief Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 California’s Forest Products Industry ............................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Top Technologies .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Next Steps ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Interim Report – Expanded Summary .............................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 California Forest Industry Infrastructure .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Determining Lumber Recovery in Sawmilling
    United States Department of Agriculture Factors Determining Forest Service Forest Products Lumber Recovery in Laboratory General Technical SawmiI ling Report FPL-39 Philip H. Steele Abstract Lumber volume recovery in sawmilling is determined by a confusing interaction of several factors. The more one knows about each individual factor, the more one can understand how the factors interact. The author identifies and discusses in detail seven factors influencing lumber recovery. Past and current research is cited, and examples are given to illustrate the points made. Keywords: Lumber recovery, sawmills, sawmilling. April 1984 Steele, Philip H. Factors determining lumber recovery in sawmilling. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-39. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Servrice, Forest Products Laboratory, 1984. 8 p. A limited number of free copies of this publication are available to the public from the Forest Products Laboratory, P.O. Box 5130, Madison, WI 63706. Laboratory publications are sent to over 1,000 libraries in the United States and elsewhere. The Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. Factors Determining Lumber Recovery in Sawmilling Philip H. Steele, Forest Products Technologist Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wis. Introduction The Factors Identified Lumber recovery in sawmilling is determined by a The following factors influence lumber recovery during the confusing interaction of several variables. Since no two sawmilling process and are examined in detail in this sawmills are alike, the variables that influence lumber report: recovery are seldom the same from one sawmill to (1) Log diameter, length, taper, and quality. another. This complexity confuses even those with a wide (2) Kerf width.
    [Show full text]
  • Old School Water and Wastewater Operator Training
    Inte rnational Correspondence Schools Scranton, Pa. Weights and Measures PREPARED ESPECIALLY FOR HOME ST UDY By I.C.S. STAFF 53766 1978 EDITION 1 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Serial 1978 Edition I DENOMINATE NUlUBERS REVIEW NOTICE This t~xt includes tables a~d ezplanations of the various English ENGLISH MEASURES a.nd metnc ~easures. T~e subJects of reduction descending and reduc­ bon ascending are ezpla1ned and also the conversion from one system to anoth.er. There; a.re ~U ezplanations of the rules for the addition, su~trachon, multipl!cahon and . div~aion of compound numbers, and DEFJXITJOXS dnll problems shoWlng the apphcahon of these processes in practical problems. 1. Varieties of Measures.-A :m.easure is a standard From time t~ time s.light changes have been made in the text since it unit, established by law or custom, by means of which a quan­ was first pubhshed, 1~ order to ~i mplify those passages that were tity of any kind may be measured. For example, the inch and found to cause some d1~culty. Th1s text was reviewed in 1941 by J. W. Law.rence, A. M., Duector of the School of Mathematics of the the mile are measures of leugth; the pint and the gallon are Internabonal Correspondence Schools and found to be fundamentall aouna. ' Y measures of capacil)•, as used for liquids; the ounce and the ton are measnres of weight; the second and the month are measures Copyright, 1921, by I NTERNATIONAL T EXTBOOK COKPASY. Copyright in Great of time, and so on. Britain. All rights resen-ed 1978 Printed in U.
    [Show full text]
  • The International System of Units (SI) - Conversion Factors For
    NIST Special Publication 1038 The International System of Units (SI) – Conversion Factors for General Use Kenneth Butcher Linda Crown Elizabeth J. Gentry Weights and Measures Division Technology Services NIST Special Publication 1038 The International System of Units (SI) - Conversion Factors for General Use Editors: Kenneth S. Butcher Linda D. Crown Elizabeth J. Gentry Weights and Measures Division Carol Hockert, Chief Weights and Measures Division Technology Services National Institute of Standards and Technology May 2006 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlo M. Gutierrez, Secretary Technology Administration Robert Cresanti, Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology William Jeffrey, Director Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publications 1038 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Pub. 1038, 24 pages (May 2006) Available through NIST Weights and Measures Division STOP 2600 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2600 Phone: (301) 975-4004 — Fax: (301) 926-0647 Internet: www.nist.gov/owm or www.nist.gov/metric TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Grade a Guide to Appearance Grading UK Grown Hardwood Timber
    Making the Grade A guide to appearance grading UK grown hardwood timber Contents Authors Ivor Davies 1 and Guy Watt 2 Introduction 3 Photography Unless otherwise stated, all photographs are by G R Brearley, Forest Research The appearance grading system used in this guide 5 Acknowledgements This guide has been commissioned by the Forestry Commission, the Welsh Development Detailed grading criteria Agency, the Northern Ireland Forest Service, 8 Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish Forestry Trust. Ash The authors gratefully acknowledge the 10 support of the project steering group and a large number of busy people throughout the hardwood supply-chain. Most of the Beech 12 timber samples were generously supplied by Woodschool Ltd, English Woodlands Timber Ltd and Scottish Wood Ltd. Oak 14 Disclaimer Appearance grading can only be a first approximation and it is always up to the customer to ensure that the characteristics of Sycamore 18 the timber selected will suit their envisaged use. In case of dispute, reference should be made to the relevant standards listed in the bibliography. While every effort has been made Sweet chestnut 20 to ensure the accuracy of this publication, the authors, sponsors, and publishers cannot accept liability for any loss or damage arising Cherry from the information supplied. 22 Publication details This publication should be cited as: Lime Davies I. and Watt G., 2005, 23 Making the Grade – A guide to appearance grading UK grown hardwood timber. Published by Elm 24 arcamedia 8 Campbell’s Close, Edinburgh EH8 8JJ Appendix 1 Telephone: 0131 556 7963 A comparison between this system and Email: [email protected] 26 the European and British standards Printed by Keyline ISBN 1-904320-03-1 Appendix 2 Text © Crown Copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Timber Products Harvested from Your Woodland Paul Oester and Steve Bowers
    Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/ec1127 FOREST MEASUREMENT EC 1127 • Revised December 2009 Measuring Timber Products Harvested from Your Woodland Paul Oester and Steve Bowers Contents Fundamentals of measurement ..............1 anaging woodland property offers you the opportunity Measurement units ...............................2 Board foot ............................................. 2 to harvest a variety of products, depending on timber Cubic foot .............................................. 2 quality and quantity, harvest economics, and market Cord ..................................................... 2 M availability. Among these products are saw logs (for lumber Linear measurements .............................. 2 or plywood), peeler logs (for plywood), pulpwood, fuelwood, Weight .................................................. 3 poles, piling, and posts. Measuring logs ....................................3 Board-foot log rules ................................ 3 Knowledge of measurements used in the wood products Log scaling ............................................ 4 industry can help you make management and marketing deci- Board-foot volume .................................. 4 sions that ultimately will increase financial returns from your Selling logs by weight ............................. 4 woodlot. Cubic-foot volume ................................... 5 Defects .................................................. 7 This publication describes measurements used to buy and
    [Show full text]
  • Date Thesis Is Presented Analysis Has Further Usefulness in Projecting The
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Douglas Sterling Smith for the Master of Science in Forest Management. Date thesis is presented November ZZ, 1966 Title A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF LOG VOLUME CONCEPTS AND PRODUCT DERIVATIVES Abstract approved Signature redacted for privacy. One of the most important challenges facing foresters is the development of a raw material measurement system designed to give a complete inventory of log volume and to assist in planning the com- plete management of log production.This paper introduces a concept of production analysis in terms of solid fiber content.The basis for the development of this concept is the measurement of logs and log production in terms of cubic feet.Total raw material accountability is maintained throughout the manufacturing process. A mill study was undertaken to compare the results of this type of analysis with results obtained by traditional analytical methods. It was found that raw material management by this analysis can be useful in measuring the effectiveness of a production design.This analysis has further usefulness in projecting the results of proposed changes in production design.The mill study was undertaken with 2 the log input, primary lumber products, and sawmill residuals measured in terms of cubic feet of wood fiber.This study is referred to as treatment A in this paper.The mill study data were used to project two changes in sawing practices, treatments B and C, and the expected results are presented.The 471 logs in the study had a volume of 172, 850 board feet gross, and 143, 490 board feet net, Scribner scale.The logs had a volume of 24, 574 cubic feet on the basis of Smalian? s cubic foot rule.The volumes in the study were assigned dollar values on the basis of grade and projected on the basis of an annual cut of 30 million board feet, assuming the same variables encountered in the test material.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of Log Rules U.S.D.A
    A COLLECTION OF LOG RULES U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT FPL U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY MADISON, WIS. CONTENTS Introduction 1 Symbology 3 A graphic comparison of log rules 4 Section I. Log Rules of United States and 9 Canada Section II. Some Volume Formulae, Lumber 41 Measures, and Foreign Log Rules Tables showing the board foot volume of 16- 50 foot logs according to various log rules Bibliography 56 A COLLECTION OF LOG RULES By FRANK FREESE, Statistician Forest Products Laboratory Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture INTRODUCTION A log rule may be defined as a table or formula names. In addition, there are numerous local showing the estimated net yield for logs of a given variations in the application of any given rule. diameter and length. Ordinarily the yield is ex- Basically, there are three methods of develop- pressed in terms of board feet of finished lumber, ing a new log rule. The most obvious is to record though a few rules give the cubic volume of the the volume of lumber produced from straight, log or some fraction of it. Built into each log rule defect-free logs of given diameters and lengths are allowances for losses due to such things as and accumulate such data until all sizes of logs slabs, saw kerf, edgings, and shrinkage. have been covered. These “mill scale” or “mill At first glance, it would seem to be a relative- tally” rules have the virtue of requiring no as- ly simple matter to devise such a rule and having sumptions and of being perfectly adapted to all the done so that should be the end of the problem.
    [Show full text]