Foreign Animal Diseases

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foreign Animal Diseases FOREIGN ANIMAL DISEASES REVISED 2008 SEVENTH EDITION Committee on Foreign and Emerging Diseases of the United States Animal Health Association USAHA PO Box 8805 St. Joseph, MO 64508 Phone: 816-671-1144 Fax: 816-671-1201 email: [email protected] Internet site: www.usaha.org Copyright © 2008 by United States Animal Health Association ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Library of Congress Catalogue Number 2008900990 ISBN 978-0-9659583-4-9 Boca Publications Group, Inc. 2650 N. Military Trail, 240-SZG Boca Raton, FL 33431 [email protected] Printed in Canada 3 PREFACE Educating the veterinary profession about Foreign Animal Diseases has been a long tradition of the U. S. Animal Health Association. The first “Gray Book” edition was published more than half a century ago in 1953, with subsequent editions in 1964, 1975, 1984, 1992 and in 1998. Traditionally, the task of the reviewing and updating this book, still familiarly known as the “Gray Book” (despite the white cover of recent editions) falls to the Chair and Co-Chair of the USAHA’s Foreign and Emerging Disease Committee. We are thus indebted to the U.S. Animal Health Association for the opportunity to assemble this, the 7 th edition of Foreign Animal Diseases . There have been vast changes in the world since the last edition was published in 1998. At that time, the World Trade Organization was just three years old and only beginning the tremendous facilitation of international trade that we see today. The last edition was published before Nipah virus in Malaysia, before the massive foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in the United Kingdom, before the advent of the term “agroterror”, before SARS had infected any humans, and prior to the possibility of highly pathogenic avian influenza as a human pandemic. Indeed, with so many new pathogens as well as old pathogens surfacing in new and unexpected places, the term “foreign animal disease” is becoming less relevant, even as the threat of foreign animal disease incursions becomes more relevant. We have utmost respect for and gratitude to the authors of the chapters. Their contributions were timely, articulate, and accurate. This book is rightfully theirs and we are merely organizers and purveyors of their information. We owe special thanks to Visual Information Services at the Plum Island Animal Disease Center, whose staff supplied most of the new photographs in Part IV. In addition, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Professional Development Staff (PDS), was very generous in allowing us to borrow Dr. Jason Baldwin, who served as an infallible and incredibly diligent copy and content editor. PDS also supplied the funding for the final formatting of the book, including the new cover design. We also acknowledge our host institutions, the Colleges of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Georgia and Cornell University, for allowing us the time to devote to the editing and assembling of this book. We were each generously 4 given the opportunities to apply our efforts, without any expectations of compensation. Fortunately, the leaders of our respective institutions understand the importance and impact that this volume has on preparing our animal health professionals. Lastly, we wish to recognize the long-term efforts of Dr. Charles Mebus, in research, diagnosis, and dissemination of information regarding foreign animal diseases. Chuck Mebus has been a mentor to the two of us at various stages in our careers and has always served as a stellar role model, good friend, and a visionary regarding the larger picture of animal health. As it was done for the 6 th edition, we re-dedicate this, the 7 th edition of Foreign Animal Disease, to him. Corrie Brown, DVM, PhD, DACVP Chair, Foreign Animal and Emerging Diseases Committee Josiah Meigs Distinguished Teaching Professor College of Veterinary Medicine University of Georgia Athens, GA, 30602 Alfonso Torres, DVM, MS, PhD Co-Chair, Foreign Animal and Emerging Diseases Committee Professor & Associate Dean for Public Policy College of Veterinary Medicine Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14850 5 FOREWORD For more than a half century the “Gray Book” has been the key resource for veterinarians, from private practitioners to federal, state and corporate practices and students regarding foreign animal diseases. The preparation of this book is a tangible example of the remarkable cooperation between all the sectors of the U.S. Animal Health Association. Professionals from academia, U.S. federal and state agencies, and a number of foreign countries have shared their expertise and their time to create this seventh edition. The Chair and Co-Chair of the USAHA Committee on Foreign and Emerging Diseases, Corrie Brown, DVM, PhD, and Alfonso Torres, DVM, PhD, respectively, have coordinated the compilation of this edition, with USAHA acting as the publishing agency. On behalf of the USDA, I want to express my appreciation to the leadership of USAHA, Drs. Brown and Torres, and all the authors, reviewers and editors for their selfless contributions. There are no monetary remunerations or royalties for writing this book: its creation grew from the collective understanding of the importance of sustaining a successful history of safeguarding all animal health industries from animal diseases. Dr. John R. Clifford Deputy Administrator for Veterinary Services, and U.S. Chief Veterinary Officer Animal Plant & Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington DC 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE – THE EDITORS………………………..…………. 3 FORWARD – USDA…………………………….……..………… 5 PART I – CONTRIBUTORS…………………….……………… 8 PART II – GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS……….………….. 15 1. Protecting the U.S. from Foreign Animal Diseases ……………. 17 2. Diagnostic Laboratory Procedures and Interpretation …………. 31 3. Sample Collection: Species-specific list of tissues ……………. 45 4. Shipping Diagnostic Specimens …………….….….….……….. 49 5. Animal Pathogen Disinfectants ………………………………… 61 6. Mass Culling …………………………………………………… 85 7. Carcass Management ………………………………………….. 93 PART III – DISEASES 1. African horse sickness …………………………………….…. 103 2. African swine fever …………………………………………… 111 3. Akabane disease ……………………………………………… 117 4. Arthropod livestock pests and disease vectors. ………………. 125 5. Avian influenza …………………………………………….…. 137 6. Babesiosis …………………………………………….………. 147 7. Bluetongue ……………………………………………………. 159 8. Borna disease …………………………………………………. 167 9. Bovine ephemeral fever ………………………………………. 175 10. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy …………………………. 185 11. Capripoxvirus ………………………………………………… 189 12. Classical swine fever ………………………………………….. 197 13. Contagious agalactia of sheep and goats ……………………… 207 14. Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia …………………………. 213 15. Contagious caprine pleuropneumonia ……………………..….. 219 16. Contagious equine metritis ……………………………………. 225 17. Dourine …………………………………………………….….. 231 18. Duck virus hepatitis ……………………………………….….. 237 7 19. East Coast fever …………………………………………….… 243 20. Epizootic lymphangitis ……………………………………….. 251 21. Equine encephalosis ……………….…………………………. 257 22. Foot-and-mouth disease ………………………………………. 261 23. Getah ………………………………………………………….. 277 24. Glanders ………………………………………………………. 281 25. Heartwater …………………………………………………….. 287 26. Hemorrhagic septicemia ……………………………….……… 297 27. Hendra ………………………………………………………… 301 28. Infectious salmon anemia ……………………………………... 305 29. Japanese encephalitis …………………………………………. 311 30. Jembrana ………………………………………………..…….. 317 31. Louping-ill …………………………………………………….. 321 32. Malignant catarrhal fever ……………………………………... 325 33. Nairobi sheep disease …………………………………………. 335 34. Newcastle disease …………………………………………….. 343 35. Nipah …………………………………………………………. 351 36. Peste des petits ruminants …………………………………….. 357 37. Rabbit hemorrhagic disease …………………………………... 365 38. Rift Valley fever ……………………………………………… 369 39. Rinderpest …………………………………………………….. 377 40. Screwworm …………………………………………………… 383 41. Spring viremia of carp ………………………………………… 391 42. Swine vesicular disease ……………………………………….. 397 43. Tropical theileriosis ……………………………………..……. 401 44. Trypanosomiasis ……………………………………………… 405 45. Venezuelan equine encephalitis ………………………………. 411 46. Vesicular exanthema of swine ………………………………… 419 47. Vesicular stomatitis …………………………………………… 423 48 Wesselsbron …………………………………………………… 431 PART IV – PHOTOGRAPHS ……………………………………... 435 8 FOREIGN ANIMAL DISEASES I CONTRIBUTORS Corrie Brown College of Veterinary Medicine University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602-7388 [email protected] Claudio S.L. Barros Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Santa Maria, Brazil [email protected] Rafael Fighera Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Santa Maria, Brazil [email protected] R.O. Gilbert College of Veterinary Medicine Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853-6401 [email protected] Alan J. Guthrie Equine Research Centre Faculty of Veterinary Science University of Pretoria Onderstepoort, 0110, Republic of South Africa [email protected] Christopher Hamblin 94 South Lane, Ash, Near Aldershot Hampshire, GU12 6NJ, England [email protected] 9 Christiane Herden Institut fur Pathologie Tierarztliche Hochschule Hannover Hannover, Germany [email protected] Sharon K. Hietala University of California-Davis Davis, CA 95617 [email protected] Daniel J. King Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory USDA-ARS Athens, GA 30605 [email protected] Peter Kirkland Head, Virology Laboratory Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute Menangle, NSW, Australia [email protected] Paul Kitching National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Recommended publications
  • LES PESTIVIRUS À L'interface FAUNE SAUVAGE/FAUNE DOMESTIQUE : Pathogénie Chez L'isard Gestant Et Épidémiologie Dans La
    THESE Présentée devant L’UNIVERSITE DE NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS EN COTUTELLE AVEC L’UNIVERSITE DE LIEGE pour l’obtention du DIPLOME DE DOCTORAT (arrêté du 25 avril 2002) Spécialité INTERACTIONS MOLECULAIRES Et du DIPLOME EN SCIENCES VETERINAIRES présentée et soutenue publiquement le 20 décembre 2011 par Mlle Claire MARTIN LES PESTIVIRUS À L’INTERFACE FAUNE SAUVAGE/FAUNE DOMESTIQUE : Pathogénie chez l’isard gestant et épidémiologie dans la région Provence-Alpes-Côte D’azur JURY : M. Richard THIERY, co-directeur de thèse M. Claude SAEGERMAN, co-directeur de thèse Mme Anny CUPO, co-directeur de thèse Mme Sophie ROSSI, Examinateur M. François MOUTOU, Examinateur M. Benoît DURAND, Rapporteur Mme Marie-Pierre RYSER-GEGIORGIS, Rapporteur M. Pascal HENDRIKS, Président de jury 1 2 RESUME Dans les Alpes du Sud de la France, des diminutions de populations de chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) ont été rapportées. Or, depuis une dizaine d’année, des pestivirus ont causé de fortes mortalités dans des populations d’isards des Pyrénées (Rupicapra pyrenaica). Bien que les signes cliniques associés à cette infection aient été caractérisés chez cette espèce, la pathogénie chez les animaux gestants est peu étudiée. De plus, des transmissions inter-espèces ont régulièrement été incriminées dans l’épidémiologie des pestiviroses ; ceci particulièrement au niveau des alpages où des contacts fréquents sont décrits entre ruminants sauvages et domestiques. Les objectifs de ce travail de thèse ont donc été, dans un premier temps, d’étudier la pathogénie de l’infection à pestivirus chez des isards et plus particulièrement ses effets sur la gestation. Dans un second temps, nous avons étudié l’épidémiologie de l’infection dans différentes zones de la région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur (PACA), tout d’abord chez des ruminants sauvages, puis à l’interface entre les ruminants sauvages et domestiques partageant les mêmes alpages.
    [Show full text]
  • Bovine Ephemeral Fever in Asia: Recent Status and Research Gaps
    viruses Review Bovine Ephemeral Fever in Asia: Recent Status and Research Gaps Fan Lee Epidemiology Division, Animal Health Research Institute; New Taipei City 25158, Taiwan, China; [email protected]; Tel.: +886-2-26212111 Received: 26 March 2019; Accepted: 2 May 2019; Published: 3 May 2019 Abstract: Bovine ephemeral fever is an arthropod-borne viral disease affecting mainly domestic cattle and water buffalo. The etiological agent of this disease is bovine ephemeral fever virus, a member of the genus Ephemerovirus within the family Rhabdoviridae. Bovine ephemeral fever causes economic losses by a sudden drop in milk production in dairy cattle and loss of condition in beef cattle. Although mortality resulting from this disease is usually lower than 1%, it can reach 20% or even higher. Bovine ephemeral fever is distributed across many countries in Asia, Australia, the Middle East, and Africa. Prevention and control of the disease mainly relies on regular vaccination. The impact of bovine ephemeral fever on the cattle industry may be underestimated, and the introduction of bovine ephemeral fever into European countries is possible, similar to the spread of bluetongue virus and Schmallenberg virus. Research on bovine ephemeral fever remains limited and priority of investigation should be given to defining the biological vectors of this disease and identifying virulence determinants. Keywords: Bovine ephemeral fever; Culicoides biting midge; mosquito 1. Introduction Bovine ephemeral fever (BEF), also known as three-day sickness or three-day fever [1], is an arthropod-borne viral disease that mainly strikes cattle and water buffalo. This disease was first recorded in the late 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Camelpox Virus Genesig Standard
    Primerdesign TM Ltd Camelpox virus A-type inclusion protein fragment (ATI) gene genesig® Standard Kit 150 tests For general laboratory and research use only Quantification of Camelpox virus genomes. 1 genesig Standard kit handbook HB10.04.10 Published Date: 09/11/2018 Introduction to Camelpox virus Camelpox is a disease of camels caused by a virus of the family Poxviridae. The virus is closely related to the Vaccinia virus that causes Smallpox and is part of the Orthopoxvirus genus. It causes skin lesions and a generalized infection. Approximately 25% of young camels that become infected will die from the disease, while infection in older camels is generally milder. The infection may also spread to the hands of those that work closely with camels in rare cases. It is a brick-shaped, enveloped virus that ranges in size from 265-295 nm. The double-stranded, linear DNA genome consists of approximately 202,000 tightly packed base pairs encased in a viral core with the replication enzymes believed to be held in lateral bodies outside the core. The virus can be transmitted via direct contact where a camel becomes infected via contact with an infected camel. This is transmission method is also suspected of being the transmission route to humans as most of the human cases presented symptoms on their hands and fingers. The virus can also be transmitted via indirect contact where a camel may become infected after coming into contact with milk, saliva, ocular and nasal secretions from infected camels. The virus has the ability to remain virulent for up to 4 months without a host.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Guilan Province and Their Medical and Veterinary Importance
    cjhr.gums.ac.ir Caspian J Health Res. 2018;3(3):91-96 doi: 10.29252/cjhr.3.3.91 Caspian Journal of Health Research A Checklist of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Guilan Province and their Medical and Veterinary Importance Shahyad Azari-Hamidian1,2*, Behzad Norouzi1 A B S T R A C T A R T I C L E I N F O Background: Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are the most important arthropods in medicine and health because of the burden of diseases which they transmit such as malaria, encephalitis, filariasis. In 2011, the last checklist of mosquitoes of Guilan Province included 30 species representing 7 genera. Methods: Using the main data bases such as Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Scientific Information Database (SID), IranMedex and Magiran which were searched up to August 2018 and reviewing the literature, the available data about the mosquito-borne diseases of Iran and Guilan Province were extracted and analyzed. Also the checklist of mosquitoes of Guilan Province was updated. Results: One protozoal disease (human malaria), two arboviral diseases (West Nile fever, bovine ephemeral fever), two helminthic diseases (dirofilariasis, setariasis) and one bacterial disease (anthrax) have been found in Guilan Province which biologically or mechanically are assumed to transmit by mosquitoes. The updated checklist of mosquitoes of Guilan Province is presented containing 33 species representing 7 or 9 genera according different classifications of the tribe Aedini. Conclusion: There is no information about the role of mosquitoes in the transmission of bovine ephemeral fever and anthrax in Iran and Guilan Province. Also the vectors of dirofilariasis and setariasis are not known in Guilan Province and available data belong to other provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for Common Viral Diseases of Animals in Louisiana
    Sampling and Testing Guide for Common Viral Diseases of Animals in Louisiana Please click on the species of interest: Cattle Deer and Small Ruminants The Louisiana Animal Swine Disease Diagnostic Horses Laboratory Dogs A service unit of the LSU School of Veterinary Medicine Adapted from Murphy, F.A., et al, Veterinary Virology, 3rd ed. Cats Academic Press, 1999. Compiled by Rob Poston Multi-species: Rabiesvirus DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 1 Cattle Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 2 Deer and Small Ruminants Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral disease Respiratory viral disease Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 3 Swine Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 4 Horses Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Neurological viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Abortifacient/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 5 Dogs Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v.
    [Show full text]
  • Carabid Beetles Collected from Vegetable Ecosystem
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(6): 1581-1590 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 JPP 2018; 7(6): 1581-1590 Carabid beetles collected from vegetable Received: 16-09-2018 Accepted: 18-10-2018 ecosystem Phunu Mili Department of Entomology, Phunu Mili, Anjumoni Devee and Dilip Kumar Saikia Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India Abstract The work on 'Carabid complex of horticultural orchards' was conducted in the Experimental Farm, Anjumoni Devee Department of Horticulture, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat-13, during the year 2014-2015 and Department of Entomology, Assam Agricultural University, 2015-16 to give a comprehensive information of carabids found in horticultural crops. Carabids were Jorhat, Assam, India collected by pitfall trap, light trap, sweep net and hand picking from okra, brinjal, cabbage, cucumber and bean. Total 12 species of carabids belonging to 7 genera viz., Clivina, Scarites, Harpalus, Pherosophus, Dilip Kumar Saikia Pterostichus, Chlaenius, and Sparostes under 6 tribes- Clivinini, Scaritini, Harpalini, Brachinini, Department of Entomology, Pterostichini and Chlaeniini and 5 subfamily (Scaritinae, Harpalinae, Brachininae, Pterostichinae and Assam Agricultural University, Licininae) were identified by following published Keys and literature and described on the basis of Jorhat, Assam, India observed morphological characters. Among these species, 3 under Clivina viz., C. assamensis, C. memnonia, C. lobata and 2 under Scarites, Harpalus and Pherosophus each viz., S. indus, S. inconspicuous, H. rufipes, H. calceatus, P. occipitalis and Pherosophus sp. From Pterostichus, Chlaenius and Sparostes, there was one species of each genus viz., Pterostichus madidus, C. bimaculatus and Sparostes striatulus. Highest collection of carabids were obtained from pitfall trap (46%) followed by light trap (42%).
    [Show full text]
  • Recombinant and Chimeric Viruses
    Recombinant and chimeric viruses: Evaluation of risks associated with changes in tropism Ben P.H. Peeters Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Division of Infectious Diseases, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands. May 2005 This report represents the personal opinion of the author. The interpretation of the data presented in this report is the sole responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the opinion of COGEM or the Animal Sciences Group. Dit rapport is op persoonlijke titel door de auteur samengesteld. De interpretatie van de gepresenteerde gegevens komt geheel voor rekening van de auteur en representeert niet de mening van de COGEM, noch die van de Animal Sciences Group. Advisory Committee Prof. dr. R.C. Hoeben (Chairman) Leiden University Medical Centre Dr. D. van Zaane Wageningen University and Research Centre Dr. C. van Maanen Animal Health Service Drs. D. Louz Bureau Genetically Modified Organisms Ing. A.M.P van Beurden Commission on Genetic Modification Recombinant and chimeric viruses 2 INHOUDSOPGAVE RECOMBINANT AND CHIMERIC VIRUSES: EVALUATION OF RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGES IN TROPISM Executive summary............................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Genetic modification of viruses .................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • HEADLINE NEWS • 6/23/09 • PAGE 2 of 8
    EADLINE H Battle for Ky NEWS Slots For information about TDN, See page 2 call 732-747-8060. www.thoroughbreddailynews.com TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 2009 RACHEL WORKS HALF FOR MOTHER GOOSE GOLDEN IN THE DAPHNIS Stonestreet Stables and Harold McCormick=s Rachel Golden Century (El Prado {Ire}) made the most of soft Alexandra (Medaglia d=Oro) worked a half in :49 4/5 at early fractions and proved best late to hold off Allybar Churchill Downs yesterday in advance of Saturday=s GI (Ire) (King=s Best) by a length in yesterday=s G3 Prix Mother Goose Daphnis at Longchamp. AHe is a nice horse and won S. at Belmont well,@ said winning jockey Maxime Guyon. AI don=t Park. The filly know what [trainer, Andre] Mr. Fabre is going to do ships to New with him, but he won=t stay much further than that.@ York this Golden Century followed a debut win over this trip at morning. Un- Fontainebleau Apr. 10 with a third when upped to a der exercise mile and a half in a conditions event at Saint-Cloud rider Dominic May 1. Back to a mile at this track last time May 30, Terry, Rachel the homebred returned to winning ways and extended was caught his sequence under an enterprising ride. Allowed to through frac- saunter along behind reluctant rivals shortly after the tions of :13, start, the bay ran freely until settled into his soft lead, :25 and and after kicking at the top of the stretch, was mainly hand ridden to comfortably beat the Wertheimer=s Reed Palmer photo :37.40; she galloped out homebred Allybar.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Sheet #1
    Pathogens 1. Acinetobacter a. A. calcoaceticus i. Animals, Man – Opportunistic Infections 2. Actinobacillus a. A. actinomycetemocomitans i. Animals – Opportunistic Infection ii. Man – Opportunistic Infection b. A. equuli i. Equine – Actinobacillosis c. A. lignieresii i. Bovine – Actinobacillosis d. A. pleuropneumoniae i. Porcine – Pleuropneumonia 3. Aeromonas a. A. hydrophilia i. Animals, Man – Opportunistic Infection 4. Alcaligenes a. Alcaligenes species i. Animals, Man – Opportunistic Infection 5. Bacillus a. B. anthracis i. Animals, Man – Anthrax b. B. cereus i. Man – Food Poisoning 6. Bordetella a. B. bronchiseptica i. Canine – Tracheobronchitis (Kennel Cough) ii. Porcine – Atrophic Rhinitis b. B. pertussis i. Man – Pertussis (Whooping Cough) 7. Brucella a. B. abortus i. Bovine –Abortion, Orchitis b. B. canis i. Canine - Abortion, Orchitis c. B. melitensis i. Ovine - Abortion, Orchitis d. B. ovis i. Ovine - Abortion, Orchitis e. B. suis i. Porcine - Abortion, Orchitis 8. Burkholderia a. B. mallei i. Equine – Glanders b. B. pseudomallei 9. Campylobacter a. C. fetus fetus i. Ovine – Epizootic abortion b. C. fetus veneralis i. Bovine – Campylobacteriosis c. C. jejuni i. Man – Enteritis d. i. Animal, Man – Melioidosis 10. Clostridium a. C. botulimum i. Animals, Man – Botulism b. C. chauvoei i. Bovine – Blackleg c. C. perfringens i. Ovine – Enterotoxemia ii. Man – Gas Gangrene d. C. tetani i. Animals, Man – Tetanus 11. Corynebacterium a. C. diphtheriae i. Man – Diphtheria b. C. psuedotuberculosis i. Ovine – Caseous lymphadenitis c. C. renale i. Bovine – Contagious pyelonephritis 12. Dermatophilus a. D. congolensis i. Animals, Man – Dermatophilosis 13. Erysipelothrix a. E. rhusiopathiae i. Porcine – Erysipelas ii. Man – Erysipeloid 14. Enterococcus species a. Opportunistic pathogens of humans and domestic animals b.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Skin Infections
    BACTERIAL SKIN INFECTIONS SPEAKER: DR LUIZ ALBERTO BOMJARDIM PÔRTO DERMATOLOGIST BRAZIL MRSA INFECTIONS • Concept: Methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus • Epidemiology: Gradual increase of resistance. • Nosocomial MRSA risk factors: Hospitalization, ICU, invasive procedures, previous antibiotic therapy, health professionals, diabetes mellitus, EV drugs, immunosuppression and chronic diseases. MRSA INFECTIONS • Community MARSA risk factors: Children, EV drugs, indigenous, homosexual men, military, prisoners and athletes. • Microorganisms more virulent by genetic characteristics. MRSA INFECTIONS • Clinic caracteristics: -Abscess, cellulitis, folliculitis, impetigo, infected wounds, external otitis, paronychia and colonization of the skin in cases of atopic dermatitis. - Increased morbidity. • Propedeutics: Culture blood, tissue or secretion. MRSA INFECTIONS • Treatment: - Pathology-specific treatment. - Prefer non-beta-lactam antibiotics, such as: clindamycin, sulfamethoxazole- trimethoprim and tetracyclines. - On suspicion of MARSA infection, start empirical antibiotics and stagger specific antibiotics by culture with antibiograma. MRSA INFECTIONS • Treatment: - Decolonization: systemic antibiotic therapy, topical 2% mupirocin, personal hygiene with antiseptic or antimicrobial solutions (iodine-povidine, chlorhexidine or triclosan). MRSA INFECTIONS • Prevention: - Avoid skin-to-skin contact and share personal belongings / clothing. - Hand washing. - Use of alcohol gels. - Cover wounds. - Isolation contact of MARSA carriers. - Early
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Camel Pox: an Economically Overwhelming Disease of Pastorals
    Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. (2018). 5(9): 65-73 International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN: 2348-8069 www.ijarbs.com DOI: 10.22192/ijarbs Coden: IJARQG(USA) Volume 5, Issue 9 - 2018 Review Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2018.05.09.006 Review on Camel Pox: An Economically Overwhelming Disease of pastorals Tekalign Tadesse*, Endalu Mulatu and Amanuel Bekuma College of Agriculture and Forestry, Mettu University, P.O. Box 318, Bedele, Ethiopia *Corresponding Author: Tekalign Tadesse. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Camelpox is an economically important, notifiable skin disease of camelids and could be used as a potential bio-warfare agent. The disease is caused by the camel pox virus, which belongs to the Orthopoxvirus genus of the Poxviridae family. Young calves and pregnant females are more susceptible. Tentative diagnosis of camel pox can be made based on clinical signs and pox lesion, but it may confuse with other viral diseases like contagious etyma and papillomatosis. Hence, specific, sensitive, rapid and cost- effective diagnostic techniques would be useful in identification, thereby early implementations of therapeutic and preventives measures to curb these diseases prevalence. Treatment is often directed to minimizing secondary infections by topical application or parenteral administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics and vitamins. The zoonotic importance of the disease should be further studied as humans today are highly susceptible to smallpox a very related and devastating virus eradicated from the globe. This review address an overview on the epidemiology, Zoonotic impacts, diagnostic approaches and the preventive measures on camel pox.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 May 7, 2014
    Joint Pathology Center Veterinary Pathology Services Wednesday Slide Conference 2013-2014 Conference 25 May 7, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ CASE I: 3121206023 (JPC 4035610). Signalment: 5-week-old mixed breed piglet, (Sus domesticus). History: Two piglets from the faculty farm were found dead, and another piglet was weak and ataxic and, therefore, euthanized. Gross Pathology: The submitted piglet was in good body condition. It was icteric and had a diffusely pale liver. Additionally, petechial hemorrhages were found on the kidneys, and some fibrin was present covering the abdominal organs. Laboratory Results: The intestine was PCR positive for porcine circovirus (>9170000). Histopathologic Description: Mesenteric lymph node: Diffusely, there is severe lymphoid depletion with scattered karyorrhectic debris (necrosis). Also scattered throughout the section are large numbers of macrophages and eosinophils. The macrophages often contain botryoid basophilic glassy intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies. In fewer macrophages, intranuclear basophilic inclusions can be found. Liver: There is massive loss of hepatocytes, leaving disrupted liver lobules and dilated sinusoids engorged with erythrocytes. The remaining hepatocytes show severe swelling, with micro- and macrovesiculation of the cytoplasm and karyomegaly. Some swollen hepatocytes have basophilic intranuclear, irregular inclusions (degeneration). Throughout all parts of the liver there are scattered moderate to large numbers of macrophages (without inclusions). Within portal areas there is multifocally mild to moderate fibrosis and bile duct hyperplasia. Some bile duct epithelial cells show degeneration and necrosis, and there is infiltration of neutrophils within the lumen. The limiting plate is often obscured mainly by infiltrating macrophages and eosinophils, and fewer neutrophils, extending into the adjacent parenchyma. Scattered are small areas with extra medullary hematopoiesis.
    [Show full text]