Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.), Vol. 96, No. I, January 1987, pp. 71-76. © Printed in India.

Development and survival of sepsret« (Wlk.) on some host plants during winter at Hisar

RAM SINGH and J P CHAUDHARY Department of Entomology, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India MS received 18 January 1986; revised 25 October 1986 Abstract. Survival and post embryonic development of the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Wlk.) was studied on 5 host plants, viz sorghum, , sugarcane, Johnson grass and napier grass during winter months (15 November to 7 March) under laboratory condi­ tions. Variations in different parameters like larval survival (10'3-60'3%), size of larvae (7'33-29-67 mm), larval weight (25'5-493'1 mg for 26 days old larva), size of pupa (15'0-16·49 rnrn), pupal weight (184'9-249'5 mg for 2-4 days old pupa), pupation (3-3-38-9%), developmental period (74,8-109'8 days) and emergence (3·4-50'0%) were significant on different foods. Low temperature and humidity conditions during experimen­ tal period' resulted in complete mortality of female pupae reared on napier grass, Johnson grass and maize whereas in case of males 60-100% were crippled winged. However, adults emerged on sorghum and sugarcane f.oods were normal except 28'7% males in sorghum were crippled. Total growth index was also higher on sugarcane (0'45) and sorghum (0'24) indicating their suitability in carrying over of winter pest population. Keywords. Armyworm; Mythimna separata; host plant; growth index.

1. Introduction

The oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Wlk.) (: ) is a ubiquitous pest of cereal crops and grasses in Asia and . About 16 serious outbreaks of the pest have been recorded in India from 1924-1981 (Sharma and Davies 1983). In northern part of the country it has been reported to cause consi­ derable damage intermittently to many graminaceous crops (Chaudhary and Ramzan 1967; Sarup et al 1969; Verma and Khurana 1971; Bindra and Singh 1973; Butter et al 1979; Chaudhary and Singh 1980; Singh and Manchanda 1981). This armyworm in recent years has started assuming serious proportions quite frequently and little information is available on the extent of survival of winter generation of this pest on various host plants. Keeping this in view, the present investigations were carried out.

2. Material and methods

Studies were carried out on 5 host plants, viz Sorghum ( (L.) Moench), maize (Zea mays L.), sugarcane (Saccharum oj)icinarum L.), Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers) and napier grass iPennisetum purpureum Schumach) from 15 November 1984 to first week of March 1985 under fluctuating laboratory conditions at the University. Freshly hatched larvae of armyworm were fed on fresh young leaves of these grasses. First instar larvae were taken from the mass culture maintained in laboratory on leaves of pearl millet and maize. Small pieces of fresh leaves of each grass were put in glass jars (20 x 15 ern). In each jar, 100 freshly 71 72 Ram Singh and J P Chaudhary hatched larvae for each test plant in 3 replications were released. These jars were covered with muslin cloth and placed under laboratory conditions. Temperature and humidity prevailing in the laboratory were recorded daily with the help of maximum-minimum, dry and wet bulb thermometers, respectively. The fresh food was provided daily. Various developmental parameters, viz larval survival, dura­ tions, size and weight; pupation, pupal weight, size and durations; pre-pupal duration, moth emergence, adult longevity etc were recorded for each food separa­ tely. Sexing was done in pupal stage as suggested by Avasthy and Chaudhary (1964). The growth indices on different foods were calculated by the following formulae (Sharma et al 1982).

Pupation (%) Larval growth index Mean larval period (days) Moth emergence (%) Total growth index Mean total developmental period (days)

3. Results and discussion

From the data summarised in table 1, larval survival when recorded after 5 days of release, ranged from 74·7-97·0% on different foods without any significant difference among them. Thereafter, it decreased gradually except in case of sugarcane where only 10'3% survival was observed on 22nd day of feeding. Sugarcane though a potential host plant of armyworm (Butani 1955; Chaudhary and Ramzan 1967), appeared to be less acceptable by first instar larvae probably due to hard leaf tissues. Kalode et al (1971) also reported 100% mortality of young larvae of Cirphis compta Moore on sugarcane leaves. Maximum (60,3%) larvae survived on napier followed by Johnson grass (54'3%) and sorghum (48'7%) without any significant difference among them. On maize leaves, only 36'7% larvae could survive. Under varying conditions of temperature and humidity larval survival of this pest on maize had been reported to vary from 12·0-60·0% (Bindra and Singh 1973; Dhaliwal and Bains 1978; Alam and Khatri 1980).

Table I. Effect of feeding on different host plants on the larval survival, size and weight of M. separata under laboratory conditions.

Larval survival (~~) (days) Size of larva Larval weight (mg) (days) (mm) (20 days Test plant 5 10 15 22 old) 14 23 26

Napier grass 97-0 77-7 71·3 60·3 2967 56·3 358·5 493·1 Sorghum 74·7 56·0 49·7 48·7 25·49 54·0 339'5 482·5 Johnson grass 76·3 66·0 59·7 54·3 25-00 59·3 284·0 306-6 Maize 94·0 61·7 47·7 36-7 2233 36·9 254-0 344-2 Sugarcane 90·7 27·7 17·3 10·3 733 5·5 25·4 25·5 Average 86·5 57·8 49·1 42·0 21-96 42·4 252·3 330·4 SEM± 9·8 4·8 5·5 5·9 0-80 4·6 19·4 62·9 CD_ at 5~~ NS 11·1 12-7 13·7 1-86 10·6 44·8 128·1 Mean temperature = 18-6± 3·2e e. Mean relative humidity = 55 ± 5~~. *Based on 300 larvae. Development and survival ofarmyworm in winter 73

Size of the larvae compared after 20 days of release ranged from 7·33 (sugarcane) to 29·67 mm (napier) indicating the slow growth of larvae on sugarcane. Larval weights after 14 days of feeding showed considerable differences on different foods. It ranged from 5·5 mg on sugarcane to 56·3 mg on napier grass. After 26 days of feeding, the range (25-5-493-1 mg) was still wider. Larvae fed on napier gained maximum weight (493'1 mg) followed by sorghum (482-5 mg) without any significant difference between them. On maize and Johnson grass, larva weighed 344-2 and 306-6 mg, respectively and were also significantly heavier than sugarcane (25-5 mg), Pupal size on different foods ranged from 15-0-16-91 mm (table 2)_ Avasthy and Chaudhary (1965) and Alam and Khatri (1980) also reported similar pupal sizes on sorghum, maize and sugarcane. Pupal weight of 2-4 days old pupa varied between 184-9 mg (sugarcane) and 249-5 mg (sorghum) at 18-2± 3-9°C and 63 ± 4-0% relative humidity, However, Tripathi et al (1982) recorded a higher range (319-5-340'7 mg) of pupal weight at 27°C and 85% relative humidity. A considerable decrease in pupal weight was recorded after 20-22 days of pupal formation on different foods. On all foods, male pupa (111·9-153-6 mg) was heavier than female pupa (98-5-127-5 mg). Inspite of highest larval weights on napier grass, pupae of both sexes were lighter in weight in comparison to that of others, However, maximum pupation (38-9%) was recorded on napier followed by sorghum (30-3%), Johnson grass (25-0%) and maize (19-7%)- On sugarcane only 3'3% larvae pupated_ Under favourable conditions more than 80% pupation was recorded on maize and sorghum (Dhaliwal and Bains 1978; Alam and Khatri 1980)_ Ratios of males and females at pupal stage were almost equal on different foods. As is evident from table 3, shortest larval period (28·2 days) was recorded on napier grass followed by sorghum (28·3 days) and Johnson grass (29-3 days) without any significant difference among them whereas, it was longest (49-8 days) on sugarcane at prevailing temperature (18-6± 3-2°q and relative humidity (54 ± 5%)_ During colder months (October hatching) larval stage had been observed to go upto 100 days on maize (Bindra and Singh 1973), but under favourable conditions it was 15'11-15-18 days on Johnson grass and maize (Kushwaha and Bhardwaj 1977), 19'3-20-75 days on sorghum and maize (Alam and Khatri 1980) and 14-22 days on

Table 2. Effect of feeding on some grasses on pupal parameters of M. separata under laboratory conditions.

Pupal weight (mg)

Size of pupa 20-22 days old Sex ratio Larval (mm) (2-4 days 2-4 days Pupation growth Test plant old) old Female Male ("'~) Male: Female index

Napier grass 16-49 236·2 98·5 111-9 38·9 1:0·82 1·38 Sorghum 15-66 249·5 1275 153-6 30·3 I: 1·\0 1·07 Johnson grass 15·24 193·7 112·4 127-1 25·0 I: 1·10 0·85 Maize 16·91 229-4 111·3 157·0 19·7 1:0·85 0·61 Sugarcane 15·00 184·9 101·2 131-1 3·3 I: 1-00 0·06 Average 16·07 218·7 110·2 136·1 23·5 1:0·97 SEM± 0·28 13·7 12·1 13-8 3·7 CD. at 5~" 0·68 31·5 NS 31·8 8·4 Mean temperalUre= 18·2± 3·9C Mean relative humidity =63 ±4~/o· ...... ~

~ l:l 3 ~ 5- ;:r l:l ;:s ~ <, Table 3. Effect of feeding on some grasses on post embryonic development of armyworm M_ separata under laboratory "'tJ conditions (15th November 1984to 7th March 1985)_ (j ;:r Developmental durations (days)" Adult Moth Crippled moths (%) Total l:l s::~ longevity emergence growth ;:s- Test plant Larval Pre-pupal Pupal Total (days) (%) Male Female index l:l ~ Napier grass 28'2 H 43'8 74-8 J2 H 100·0 - 0-04 Sorghum 28-3 J5 39-3 71·2 3·3 16·9 28·7 0-0 0-24 Johnson grass 29·3 4-7 35-8 69-8 H 4-4 100·0 - 0·06 Maize 32-2 4·7 38·9 75·8 J5 16-6 600 - 0·22 Sugarcane 49·8 10-3 49·7 109-8 JO 50-0 0-0 0-0 0-45 Average 33'6 5·2 41-5 80·3 3'2 14-5 57·7 0·0 SEM± 1'1 0-4 2-1 H 0:4 9-5 CD. at 5% 2'6 0·8 4-9 6'1 NS 21'8 Mean temperature 18'6±3-2 16·5±2·7 18-2±H 18·2± J2 16·2±2·0 16·2±2·0 16·0± 1'8 16± 1'8 ("C) Mean relative humidity (%) 55± 5 52±4 63±4 58±5 60±4 60±4 66± 3 66± 3 • Based on 300 larvae. Development and survival ofarmyworm in winter 75 sugarcane (Avasthy and Chaudhary 1965).The larval durations in the present studies were 10---12 days longer than that reported by various workers. This may be because of low temperature and humidity. Pre-pupal period ranged from 2,8-JO' 3 days. Bindra and Singh (1973) also reported prolonged pre-pupal period of J I days in January on maize due to low temperature. Pupal period (35'8 days) was shortest on Johnson grass and longest (49'7 days) on sugarcane. Due to low temperature condi­ tions pupal stage of 36-48 days was also reported by Bindra and Singh (1973) and Dhaliwal and Bains (1978). However, under favourable temperature conditions, it ranged from 8-J3 days only on different crops (Avasthy and Chaudhary 1965; Bindra and Singh J973; Kushwaha and Bhardwaj 1977; Singh and Rai 1977; Alam and Khatri 1980). Contrary to larval survival, moth emergence was maximum (50'0%) on sugarcane and minimum (3'4~~) on napier grass. Higher pupal mortality on napier grass was probably because of higher rate of lossof weight in pupa at 18·2±3·9°C and 63±4% relative humidity in comparison to sugarcane and sorghum. In addition to poor moth emergence, male adults showed crippling of wings in napier and Johnson grasses. However, in sugarcane not a single crippled moth was recorded. It was probably due to prolonged larval and pupal durations which resulted in moth emergence in the end of February when the laboratory temperature became more suitable for moth emergence. On the other hand due to short larval period on some grasses, the pupae were exposed to low temperature for a longer .tirne, which was unfavourable for the emergence of moths. Female pupae were observed to be affected more adversely by low temperature (16'0 ± 1·8°q and relative humidity (66,0 ± 3%) as not even a single female emerged on napier, Johnson grass and maize. As a result total growth index was poor on these foods. Crippled moths were found to be short lived without participating in reproductive process. Females emerged on sugarcane and sorghum laid 400---900 eggs when provided with 10~/~ sugar solution. Hence sugarcane and sorghum were found better food plants of this pest for survival during winter.

Acknowledgement

Authors are grateful to Dr NP Chopra for providing necessary facilities.

References

Alam M A and Khatri A K 1980. Effect of different host plantson the growth,developmentand survival of Mvthimna separata Walk. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae);JNKV Res. J. 14 1-6 Avasthy P N and Chaudhary J P 1964 Morphology of pupa of the green borer of sugarcane, Ruphimetopus ablutellus Zell: Indian J. Suqarcane 8 271-273 Avasthy P N and Chaudhary J P 1965 Biology and control of armyworm. Pseudaletia unipuncta Haw; Indian J. Suqurcane 9249-251 Bindra 0 S and Singh J 1973 Bionomics of the armyworm, ,I;lythimna separata (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidue) at Ludhiana, Punjab: lndian J. Auric. Sci. 48 249-303 Butani D K 1955 Control of an outbreak of the armyworm (Cirphis unipuncia Haw.) on sugarcane at Pusa. Bihar: indian J. Entomol. 17 133-136 Buller N S. Gill K S. Nanda G Sand Mahal G S 1979 Field screening of wheat gerrnplasrn against armyworm. Myrhimllll sepurata (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae); Sci. Cull. 45 77-79 Chaudhary J P and Ramzan M 1967 Armyworm: a menace to sugarcane; Proq. Farm. 47-8 76 Ram Singh and J P Chaudhary

Chaudhary J P and Singh Z 1980 Outbreak of armyworm, Mythimna separata (Walker) on paddy crop in Haryana; Haryana Aqric. Univ. J. Res. 10 248-249 Dhaliwal Z S and Bains S S 1978 Effect of temperature on the development, survival and the rate of increase of armyworm, Mythimna separata (Walker) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera); Indian J. Eco/. 5 240­ 249 Kalode M B, Varma A, Yadav C P and Israel P 1971 Feeding reaction of armyworm (Cirphis compta Moore) larvae fed on some cultivated and wild plants; Indian J. Aqric. Sci. 41 568-572 Kushwaha K S and Bhardwaj S C 1977 Forage and pasture pests of Rajasthan (New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research Publication) pp 186 Sarup P, Peshwani K M, Singh D S, Srivastava V Sand Lal R 1969 An unusual qutbreak of armyworm, Pseudaletia separata (Walker) at Delhi in 1968 and evaluation of pesticides against the larvae infesting wheat; Indian J. Entomo/. 31 265-272 Sharma H C, Agarwal R A and Singh M 1982 Effect of some antibiotic compounds in cotton on post embryonic development of spotted bollworm (Earias oittella F.) and mechanism of resistance in Gossypium arboreum; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 91 67-77 Sharma H C and Davies J C 1983 The oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Wlk.) distribution, biology and control, A literature review. Miscellaneous report no. 59 (London: Centre for Overseas Pest Research) p 24 Singh D and Manchanda SK 1981 Severe incidence of armyworm on rye in Kashmir valley; Sci. Cult. 47 97-98 Singh D and Rai L 1977 Bionomics of rice cutworm, Mythimna separata (Walker); Entomon 2 141-144 Tripathi A K, Bhattacharya A K and Verma S K 1982 Developmental behaviour of Mythimna separata (Walker) on some monocotyledonous plants; Indian J. Entomol. 44 355-367 Verma A N and Khurana AD 1971 Incidence of armyworm Pseudaletia separata Walker in different dwarf wheat varieties; Haryana Aqric. Univ. J. Res: 1 20-23