DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of the Interior Vol. 78 Thursday, No. 80 April 25, 2013 Part V Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign Species; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:12 Apr 24, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\25APP5.SGM 25APP5 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS5 24604 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR the Lists of Endangered and Threatened whose listings are warranted but Wildlife and Plants under the precluded by higher priority proposals Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Act of 1973, as to determine whether any species is an amended. When, in response to a endangered or threatened species. We 50 CFR Part 17 petition, we find that listing a species is will consider this information in [Docket No. FWS–R9–ES–2012–0044; 450 warranted but precluded by higher preparing listing documents and future 003 0115] priority proposals to determine whether resubmitted petition findings for these any species is an endangered species or 20 taxa. This information will also help Endangered and Threatened Wildlife a threatened species, we must review us to monitor the status of the taxa and and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings the status of the species each year until conserve them. We request the on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign we publish a proposed rule or make a submission of any further information Species; Annual Description of determination that listing is not on the species in this notice as soon as Progress on Listing Actions warranted. These subsequent status possible, or whenever it becomes reviews and the accompanying 12- available. We especially seek AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, month findings are referred to as information: Interior. ‘‘resubmitted’’ petition findings. (1) Indicating that we should remove ACTION: Notice of review. Since publication of the previous a taxon from consideration for listing; ANOR on May 3, 2011 (76 FR 25150), (2) Documenting threats to any of the SUMMARY: In this Annual Notice of we reviewed the available information included taxa; Review (ANOR) of foreign species, we on candidate species to ensure that (3) Describing the immediacy or present an updated list of plant and listing is warranted for each species and magnitude of threats facing these taxa; animal species foreign to the United reevaluated the relative listing priority (4) Identifying taxonomic or States that we regard as candidates for number (LPN) assigned to each species. nomenclatural changes for any of the addition to the Lists of Endangered and We also evaluated the need to taxa; or Threatened Wildlife and Plants under emergency list any of these species, (5) Noting any mistakes, such as the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as particularly species with high listing errors in the indicated historic ranges. amended. This review ensures that we priority numbers (i.e., species with You may submit your information focus conservation efforts on those LPNs of 1, 2, or 3). This review ensures concerning this notice in general or for species at greatest risk first. Overall, this that we focus conservation efforts on any of the species included in this ANOR recognizes one new candidate those species at greatest risk first. In notice by one of the methods listed in and removes one species from candidate addition to reviewing foreign candidate the ADDRESSES section. status. The current number of foreign species since publication of the last Background species that are candidates for listing is ANOR, we have worked on numerous 20. Based on our current review, we findings in response to petitions to list The Endangered Species Act of 1973, find that 20 species continue to warrant species and on proposed and final as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et listing, but their listing remains determinations for rules to list, delist, or seq.), provides two mechanisms for precluded by higher priority proposals downlist species under the Act. Some of considering species for listing. First, we, to determine whether any species is an these findings and determinations have upon our own initiative, can identify endangered species or a threatened been completed and published in the and propose for listing those species species. Federal Register, while work on others that are endangered or threatened based on the factors contained in section DATES: We will accept information on is still under way (see Preclusion and 4(a)(1) of the Act. We implement this these resubmitted petition findings at Expeditious Progress section, below, for mechanism through the candidate any time. details). Overall, this ANOR recognizes one program. Candidate taxa are those taxa ADDRESSES: This notice is available on new candidate and removes one species for which we have sufficient the Internet at http:// from candidate status. The current information on file relating to biological www.regulations.gov. Please submit any number of foreign species that are vulnerability and threats to support a new information, materials, comments, candidates for listing is 20. Based on our proposal to list the taxa as endangered or questions of a general nature on this current review, we find that 20 species or threatened, but for which preparation notice to the Arlington, VA, address continue to warrant listing, but their and publication of a proposed rule is listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION listing remains precluded by higher precluded by higher priority proposals CONTACT section below. priority proposals to determine whether to determine whether any species is an FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: any species is an endangered species or endangered species or a threatened Chief, Branch of Foreign Species, a threatened species. species. The second mechanism for Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish considering species for listing is when and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Request for Information the public petitions us to add species to Drive, Room 420, Arlington, VA 22203; This ANOR summarizes the status the Lists of Endangered and Threatened telephone 703–358–2171. If you use a and threats that we evaluated in order Wildlife and Plants (Lists). Nineteen of telecommunications device for the deaf to determine that species qualify as these species covered by this notice (TDD), call the Federal Information candidates and to assign an LPN to each were assessed through the petition Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. species or to determine that species process. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: should be removed from candidate Under section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, status. This document also describes our when we receive a listing petition we Executive Summary progress in revising the Lists of must determine within 90 days, to the In this Annual Notice of Review Endangered and Threatened Wildlife maximum extent practicable, whether (ANOR) of foreign species, we present and Plants (Lists) during the period May the petition presents substantial an updated list of plant and animal 3, 2011, through September 30, 2012. scientific or commercial information species foreign to the United States that With this ANOR, we request indicating that the petitioned action we regard as candidates for addition to additional information for the 20 taxa may be warranted (90-day finding). If VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:12 Apr 24, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25APP5.SGM 25APP5 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS5 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2013 / Proposed Rules 24605 we make a positive 90-day finding, we species, and offer technical and distinct population segments of are required to promptly commence a financial assistance to facilitate such vertebrate species (DPS). In summary, review of the status of the species. Using efforts. For additional information the LPN ranking system provides a basis the information from the status review, regarding such assistance, see FOR for making decisions about the relative in accordance with section 4(b)(3)(B) of FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. priority for preparing a proposed rule to the Act, we must make one of three On September 21, 1983, we published list a given species. Each species findings within 12 months of the receipt guidance for assigning a listing priority included in this notice is one for which of the petition (12-month finding). The number (LPN) for each candidate we have sufficient information to first possible 12-month finding is that species (48 FR 43098). Using this prepare a proposed rule to list, because listing is not warranted, in which case guidance, we assign each candidate an it is in danger of extinction or likely to we need not take any further action on LPN of 1 to 12, depending on the become endangered within the the petition. The second possibility is magnitude of threats, immediacy of foreseeable future throughout all or a that we may find that listing is threats, and taxonomic status; the lower significant portion of its range. warranted, in which case we must the LPN, the higher the listing priority For more information on the process promptly publish a proposed rule to list (that is, a species with an LPN of 1 and standards used in assigning LPNs, the species. Once we publish a would have the highest listing priority). a copy of the guidance is available on proposed rule for a species, sections Guidelines for such a priority-ranking our Web site at: http://www.fws.gov/ 4(b)(5) and 4(b)(6) of the Act govern guidance system are required under endangered/esa-library/pdf/48fr43098– further procedures, regardless of section 4(h)(3) of the Act (15 U.S.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-21478, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Domestic and Foreign Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of review. SUMMARY: In this candidate notice of review (CNOR), we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), present an updated list of plant and animal species that we regard as candidates for or have proposed for addition to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Identification of candidate species can assist environmental planning efforts by providing advance notice of potential listings, and by allowing landowners and resource managers to alleviate threats and thereby possibly remove the need to list species as endangered or threatened. Even if we subsequently list a candidate species, the early notice provided here could result in more options for species management and recovery by prompting earlier candidate conservation measures to alleviate threats to the species. This document also includes our findings on resubmitted petitions and describes our 1 progress in revising the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists) during the period October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PCN Magnolia Multisite
    Institution name plant NAMES for inventory::print name Accession # Provenanc Quantity Plant source The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College 2005-355UN*A G 1 Unknown The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College 2001-188UN*A U 1 Unknown The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College 96-129*A G 1 Princeton Nurseries The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College var. subcordata 99-203*B G 1 Longwood Gardens The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College var. subcordata 93-206*A G 1 Woodlanders Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore acuminata College var. subcordata 'Brenda'2004-239*A G 1 Pat McCracken The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Anilou' College 2008-202*A G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Anilou' College 2008-202*B G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Ann' College 68-165*A G 1 U. S. National Arboretum, Washington, DC The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Banana College Split' 2004-237*A G 1 Pat McCracken The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Betty' College 68-166*A G 1 U. S. National Arboretum, Washington, DC The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore 'Big Dude' College 2008-203*A G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore ×brooklynensis College 'Black Beauty' 2008-204*A G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore ×soulangeana College 'Jurmag1' 2010-069*A G 1 Pleasant Run Nursery The Scott Arboretum atMagnolia Swarthmore
    [Show full text]
  • Agro-Ecological Zones of Bhutan Zones (AEZ) Based Mainly on Altitude As Shown in Table 2.1 and Map 5
    Part Two OVERVIEW OF BHUTAN Country-wide Characteristics Physical features Bhutan is a mountainous and landlocked Himalayan country situated between latitude 26°40’ and 28°15’N and longitude 88°45’ and 92°10’E. It borders the Tibet Autonomous Region of China to the north and the Indian states of Assam, West Bengal, Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim to the south (Map 1). The country spans about 300 km from east to west and 170 km from north to south with a total land area of 40,973 sq.km* (Source: RNR Census 2000). The terrain is highly rugged and steep with very little flat area for productive agricultural farming. Elevation throughout the country ranges from less than 100 masl (in the south) to above 7000 masl in the north (Map 2). The country can be divided into three distinct physiographic regions on the basis of altitude and corresponding rainfall and temperature. The southern foothills range in altitude from less than 100m to about 2000 masl and comprise the Siwalik Hills together with a narrow band of flat plains along the Indian border. The inner Himalayas make up the main river valleys and steep hills and rise in elevation from about 2000 to 4000m. The great Himalayas to the north along the Tibetan border consist of snow capped peaks and alpine rangelands above around 4000m (Map 3). For administrative purposes, Bhutan is divided into twenty districts called dzongkhags, which are further subdivided into 202 sub-districts or blocks called geogs. The district and block boundaries are shown in Map 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Dugong Debacle: Lessons in the Extraterritorial Application of Section 402 of the National Historic Preservation Act As Illustrated in Dugong V
    DUGONG DEBACLE: LESSONS IN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF SECTION 402 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT AS ILLUSTRATED IN DUGONG V. GATES A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Nicole Elizabeth Moore August 2009 © 2009 Nicole Elizabeth Moore ABSTRACT In September of 2003, a multi-national group comprised of Okinawan residents, international environmental groups, and Japanese environmental lawyers sued the U.S. Department of Defense declaring that it had violated Section 402 of the National Historic Preservation Act as it failed to take into account the potential adverse effects a new military base would have on the Okinawa dugong. This work simultaneously explores the legal proceedings and argumentation presented in lawsuit, Dugong v. Gates, and highlights the impacts of the long-time social and political relationship between Okinawans, the Government of Japan and the United States military as they relate to this unprecedented case. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Nicole Moore was born and raised in Englewood, Colorado and a graduate of Englewood High School, 1999. She continued her studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder graduating in three years with a B.A. in History in 2002. Nicole worked in operations and marketing for several years before moving to Ithaca, New York to pursue a graduate degree in Historic Preservation Planning from Cornell University’s City and Regional Planning Department. Nicole currently lives in Los Angeles, California. iii This work is dedicated to Keith, Joyce, Audrey, Lydia and Sundi. Without your loving support, my path would not have led so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance and the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Vietnam by Alfred John
    Governance and the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Vietnam by Alfred John Montoya A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Aihwa Ong, Chair Professor Paul Rabinow Professor Peter Zinoman Spring 2010 Governance and the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Vietnam © 2010 By Alfred John Montoya For Michael A. Montoya, Elizabeth Alonzo, and Mary Theresa Alonzo. i Acknowledgements First, I‘d like to express my endless gratitude to my family, always with me, in far-flung places. To them I owe more than I can say. This work would not have been possible without the warm mentorship and strong support of my excellent advisors, Aihwa Ong, Paul Rabinow and Peter Zinoman. Their guidance and encouragement made all the difference. I would also like to acknowledge the intellectual and personal generosity of David Spener, Alan Pred, and Nancy Scheper-Hughes who contributed so much to my training and growth. Additionally, this work and I benefitted greatly from the myriad commentators and co-laborers from seminars, conference panels and writing groups. I would specifically like to extend my gratitude to those from the Fall 2004 graduate student cohort in the Department of Anthropology at UC Berkeley, particularly Amelia Moore and Shana Harris, whose friendship and company made graduate school and graduate student life a pleasure. Also, my heartfelt thanks to Emily Carpenter, my friend, through the triumphs and travails of these six years and this project that consumed them. Many thanks to the participants in the Anthropology of the Contemporary Research Collaboratory, at UC Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Nansei Islands Biological Diversity Evaluation Project Report 1 Chapter 1
    Introduction WWF Japan’s involvement with the Nansei Islands can be traced back to a request in 1982 by Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh. The “World Conservation Strategy”, which was drafted at the time through a collaborative effort by the WWF’s network, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), posed the notion that the problems affecting environments were problems that had global implications. Furthermore, the findings presented offered information on precious environments extant throughout the globe and where they were distributed, thereby providing an impetus for people to think about issues relevant to humankind’s harmonious existence with the rest of nature. One of the precious natural environments for Japan given in the “World Conservation Strategy” was the Nansei Islands. The Duke of Edinburgh, who was the President of the WWF at the time (now President Emeritus), naturally sought to promote acts of conservation by those who could see them through most effectively, i.e. pertinent conservation parties in the area, a mandate which naturally fell on the shoulders of WWF Japan with regard to nature conservation activities concerning the Nansei Islands. This marked the beginning of the Nansei Islands initiative of WWF Japan, and ever since, WWF Japan has not only consistently performed globally-relevant environmental studies of particular areas within the Nansei Islands during the 1980’s and 1990’s, but has put pressure on the national and local governments to use the findings of those studies in public policy. Unfortunately, like many other places throughout the world, the deterioration of the natural environments in the Nansei Islands has yet to stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanya Sanerib (DC Bar No
    Case 4:21-cv-00251-RCC Document 1 Filed 06/23/21 Page 1 of 20 1 Sarah Uhlemann (DC Bar No. 501328)* Tanya Sanerib (DC Bar No. 473506)* 2 Center for Biological Diversity 3 2400 NW 80th Street, #146 Seattle, WA 98117 4 Phone: (206) 327-2344 5 (206) 379-7363 Email: [email protected] 6 [email protected] *Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 11 TUCSON DIVISION 12 13 Center for Biological Diversity, 14 Plaintiff, Case No. 15 v. 16 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 17 Debra Haaland, in her official capacity 18 as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, 19 Defendants. 20 21 INTRODUCTION 22 1. Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity challenges the failure of the U.S. 23 Fish and Wildlife Service and the Secretary of the Interior Debra Haaland (collectively 24 “the Service” or “Defendants”) to make required, 12-month findings as to whether seven 25 foreign wildlife species “warrant” listing under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). 26 These species have been on the Service’s “candidate” list awaiting ESA protections for 27 28 1 Case 4:21-cv-00251-RCC Document 1 Filed 06/23/21 Page 2 of 20 1 decades, even though the Service has acknowledged that each qualifies for full ESA 2 listing. 3 2. The Okinawa woodpecker, Kaiser-i-hind swallowtail, Jamaican kite 4 swallowtail, black-backed tanager, Harris’ mimic swallowtail, fluminense swallowtail, 5 and the southern helmeted curassow are each in danger of or threatened with extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Urged to Protect 19 Foreign Species
    Via electronic and certified mail February 3, 2021 Scott de la Vega Director Acting Secretary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Don Morgan Chief, Branch of Delisting and Foreign Martha Williams Species, Ecological Services Principal Deputy Director 5275 Leesburg Pike U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Falls Church, VA 22041-3808 1849 C Street, NW [email protected] Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Re: Sixty-Day Notice of Intent to Sue for Failing to Make Timely 12-Month Findings on Foreign Candidate Species in Violation of the Endangered Species Act Dear Acting Secretary de la Vega, Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Principal Deputy Director Williams, and Chief Morgan, On behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity (Center), we write to notify you that the U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (together, the Service) are currently in violation of Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for failing to make required 12-month findings on 19 foreign candidate species (Table 1). Section 4(b)(3) of the ESA requires the Service to determine if ESA protections are warranted for a species within 12 months of previously finding that listing was precluded by other pending proposals.1 Here, the Service found listing of 19 foreign species was warranted but precluded on October 10, 2019, and thus new listing determinations were due by October 10, 2020—nearly four months ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Guia Para Observação Das Aves Do Parque Nacional De Brasília
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234145690 Guia para observação das aves do Parque Nacional de Brasília Book · January 2011 CITATIONS READS 0 629 4 authors, including: Mieko Kanegae Fernando Lima Favaro Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Bi… 7 PUBLICATIONS 74 CITATIONS 17 PUBLICATIONS 69 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Fernando Lima Favaro on 28 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Brasília - 2011 GUIA PARA OBSERVAÇÃO DAS AVES DO PARQUE NACIONAL DE BRASÍLIA Aílton C. de Oliveira Mieko Ferreira Kanegae Marina Faria do Amaral Fernando de Lima Favaro Fotografia de Aves Marcelo Pontes Monteiro Nélio dos Santos Paulo André Lima Borges Brasília, 2011 GUIA PARA OBSERVAÇÃO DAS AVES DO APRESENTAÇÃO PARQUE NACIONAL DE BRASÍLIA É com grande satisfação que apresento o Guia para Observação REPÚblica FEDERATiva DO BRASIL das Aves do Parque Nacional de Brasília, o qual representa um importante instrumento auxiliar para os observadores de aves que frequentam ou que Presidente frequentarão o Parque, para fins de lazer (birdwatching), pesquisas científicas, Dilma Roussef treinamentos ou em atividades de educação ambiental. Este é mais um resultado do trabalho do Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Vice-Presidente Conservação de Aves Silvestres - CEMAVE, unidade descentralizada do Instituto Michel Temer Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) e vinculada à Diretoria de Conservação da Biodiversidade. O Centro tem como missão Ministério do Meio Ambiente - MMA subsidiar a conservação das aves brasileiras e dos ambientes dos quais elas Izabella Mônica Vieira Teixeira dependem.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 154/Wednesday, August 12, 2009
    40540 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 12, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR questions concerning this notice to the precluded finding on a petition to list above address. means that listing is warranted, but that Fish and Wildlife Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the immediate proposal and timely Chief, Branch of Listing, Endangered promulgation of a final regulation is 50 CFR Part 17 Species Program, (see ADDRESSES); by precluded by higher priority listing [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0057] telephone at 703-358-2171; or by actions. In making a warranted-but [90100 16641FLA-B6] facsimile at 703-358-1735). Persons who precluded finding under the Act, the use a telecommunications device for the Service must demonstrate that Endangered and Threatened Wildlife deaf (TDD) may call the Federal expeditious progress is being made to and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800- add and remove species from the lists of on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign 877-8339. endangered and threatened wildlife and Species; Annual Description of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: plants. Progress on Listing Actions Pursuant to section 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Background Act, when, in response to a petition, we AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, The Endangered Species Act of 1973, find that listing a species is warranted Interior. but precluded, we must make a new 12– ACTION: Notice of review. as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), provides two mechanisms for month finding annually until we SUMMARY: In this notice of review, we considering species for listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 200/Monday, October 17, 2016
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 71457 for the relevant maintenance period in attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS Technology Transfer and Advancement with mobile source emissions at the through 2030. Finally, EPA finds Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because levels of the MVEBs. adequate and is proposing to approve application of those requirements would the newly-established 2020 and 2030 be inconsistent with the CAA; and C. What is a safety margin? MVEBs for the Cleveland area. • Does not provide EPA with the A ‘‘safety margin’’ is the difference discretionary authority to address, as VII. Statutory and Executive Order between the attainment level of appropriate, disproportionate human Reviews emissions (from all sources) and the health or environmental effects, using projected level of emissions (from all Under the CAA, redesignation of an practicable and legally permissible sources) in the maintenance plan. As area to attainment and the methods, under Executive Order 12898 noted in Table 11, the emissions in the accompanying approval of a (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Cleveland area are projected to have maintenance plan under section In addition, the SIP is not approved safety margins of 117.22 TPSD for NOX 107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the to apply on any Indian reservation land and 28.48 TPSD for VOC in 2030 (the status of a geographical area and do not or in any other area where EPA or an total net change between the attainment impose any additional regulatory Indian tribe has demonstrated that a year, 2014, emissions and the projected requirements on sources beyond those tribe has jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decision-Making Framework to Select a Public-Private Partnership Scheme for Infrastructure Development in Vietnam
    A DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO SELECT A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP SCHEME FOR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Minh Hang VU BConstEc, University of Transport and Communications, Vietnam MBA, La Trobe University, Australia School of Engineering College of Science, Engineering and Health RMIT University October 2019 DECLARATION I certify that, except where due acknowledgment has been made; the work is that of the author alone. The work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award. The content of the thesis is the result of work, which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program. Any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Date: 17/10/2019 Name: Minh Hang Vu ABSTRACT Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is recognised as a procurement strategy for governments to mobilise capital, skills and expertise of the private sector to deliver key infrastructures. A growing number of PPP schemes, as of a contract arrangement between public and private sectors such as Build- Operate-Transfer (BOT) and Design-Build-Operate-Maintain (DBOM), have been formed and used worldwide to deliver public services. Within the broad spectrum of PPP arrangements, several variations of PPP schemes have been developed and are on the increase. Every PPP scheme has its own pros and cons and application, however understanding of different PPP schemes varies.
    [Show full text]