DOCSLIB.ORG

Progress Toward Ignition and Burn Propagation in Inertial Confinement Fusion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progress Toward Ignition and Burn Propagation in Inertial Confinement Fusion PROGRESS TOWARD IGNITION AND BURN PROPAGATION IN INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION To achieve efficient inertial confinement fusion one must produce a small hot spot within the imploding target from which thermonuclear burn can ignite. John D. Lindl, Robert L McCrory and E. Michael Campbell For the past four decades, scientists throughout the world to be excessive and recommended that DOE review them have pursued the dream of controlled thermonuclear and schedule further declassification of target physics. fusion. The attraction of this goal is the enormous energy DOE is continuing to review its classification policy. that is potentially available in fusion fuels and the view of For D-T fuel, both the magnetic and inertial ap- fusion as a safe, clean energy source. The fusion reaction proaches require a fuel temperature in excess of 100 with the highest cross section uses the deuterium and million K and a fuel particle density n and confinement tritium isotopes of hydrogen, and D-T would be the fuel of time r such that TIT = 1014-1015 sec/cm3. Magnetic con- choice for the first generation of fusion reactors. (See the finement fusion operates in a regime with r ~ l sec and article by J. Geoffrey Cordey, Robert J. Goldston and n=:1014 cm"3. For magnetic confinement fusion, the Ronald R. Parker, January, page 22.) density is limited by the maximum magnetic field that can Development of an economically viable fusion reactor be generated, which is determined by the strength of the would literally give us the energy equivalent of oceans of material of the confinement vessels. Inertial confinement oil. Because seawater contains about 40 g of deuterium fusion relies on the inertia of an imploding target to and 0.1 g of lithium per tonne, every barrel of seawater provide confinement.1 Confinement times are less than contains the energy equivalent of almost 30 barrels of oil 10 10 sec, and particle densities in the fuel are typically in deuterium fuel and about one-fifth of a barrel of oil in greater than 1025 cm 3. D-T fuel (where tritium is obtained from neutron reac- tions on lithium). A volume of seawater equal to the top Implosion ond burn of ICF forgets meter of the Earth's oceans would yield enough fuel to High-gain ICF targets have features similar to those supply D-T fusion reactors for thousands of years of shown in figure 1. These capsules consist of a spherical electricity production at today's rate of usage. shell filled with low-density (S1.0 mg/cm3) equimolar The two primary approaches to developing fusion are deuterium-tritium gas. The shell is composed of an magnetic confinement fusion, reviewed in the January ablator and an inner region of D-T, which forms the main 1 issue of PHYSICS TODAY, and inertial confinement fusion, fuel. Energy from a driver is rapidly delivered to the reviewed in this article and the article by William J. ablator, which heats up and expands. As the ablator Hogan, Roger Bangerter and Gerald L. Kulcinski on page expands outward, the rest of the shell is forced inward to 42. Significant elements of the work presented here were conserve momentum. The capsule behaves as a spherical, carried out under classified Department of Energy pro- ablation-driven rocket. grams and have been only recently declassified. In its 2 The fusion fuel is imploded with a typical efficiency of review of ICF carried out in 1990, the National Academy 5-15%. That is, 5-15% of the total absorbed energy goes of Sciences found the DOE classification guidelines for ICF into the fuel. In its final configuration, the fuel is nearly isobaric at pressures up to about 200 gigabars but consists of two effectively distinct regions: a central hot spot, John Lindl is the ICF target physics program leader at containing about 2-5% of the fuel, and a dense main fuel Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in Livermore, region (the "cold fuel pusher"). Fusion begins in the California. Robert McCrory is director of the Laboratory for central hot spot, and a thermonuclear burn front propa- Laser Energetics at the University of Rochester, in Rochester, gates rapidly outward into the main fuel, producing high New York. Michael Campbell is deputy associate director gain. and ICF program leader at Lawrence Livermore. The efficient arrangement of the fuel in this configu- 3 2 PHYSICS TODAY SEPTEMBER 1992 © 1992 Americon Insrirure of Physics t i l l 1 1 1 1 1 Hot spot Main fuel Temperature\ 1 \ Density 1 1 1 1 /''//I \ \\Y-\ Proposed ICF capsules are imploded by ablation of an outer shell. Ignition occurs in a central hot spot, and fusion burn propagates out through the main mass of D-T fuel. Figure 1 ration places stringent requirements on the details of the Ignition occurs when the energy deposited by products driver coupling, including the time history of the irra- of the thermonuclear burn during one confinement time diance and the hydrodynamics of the implosion.3 Several equals the energy required to heat the plasma to features of the implosion process are important. One is thermonuclear burn temperatures. The specific energy the in-flight aspect ratio RlLR, where R is the shell radius (in J/g) required to heat a D-T plasma with equal electron and Aif its thickness, both taken during the implosion. and ion temperatures T (in keV) is The shell thickness Ai? is less than the initial thickness be- 9 9 cause the shell is compressed as it implodes. Hydrody- Eheat = 0.1152 xlO T= 2.3 xlO J/g at 20 keV (2) namic instabilities4 similar to the classical Rayleigh- In general only the charged-particle reaction products Taylor fluid instability impose limits on R/hR, which are available to heat the fuel because most of the neutrons result in a minimum required pressure or absorbed driver escape the plasma. For D-T fusion irradiance. For in-flight aspect ratios of 25-35, the peak values of pressure and irradiance during a pulse must D + T - n(14.06 MeV) + a(3.52 MeV) (3) 15 2 reach about 100 megabars and 10 W/cm , respectively. and er = 3.54x10" J/g. If we assume that all of the The required pressure depends on the required implosion alphas are deposited, then the energy per gram deposited velocity, which is determined by the capsule size. Mini- in the fuel is mum velocities are in the range of 3-4 x 107 cm/sec. Another important parameter is the convergence 6.68x10" (4) ratio, denned as the initial outer radius of the ablator RA pr + 6 g/cm divided by the final compressed radius of the hot spot rHS. Equating £heat and Eu from equations 2 and 4 shows Typical values are 30-40. To maintain a near-spherical that at 20 keV, ignition occurs for pr>0.21 g/cm2 implosion, implosion velocities must be uniform to about (nr > 1.7 X1014 sec/cm3), corresponding to a burn efficiency 1%. Control of the implosion symmetry and minimization of about 3.4%. Ignition is an adequate achievement for a of mixing of the fuel by Rayleigh-Taylor-induced instabili- magnetic fusion plasma if the energy required to maintain ties are crucial to the successful formation of the central confinement is much less than the energy needed to heat hot spot. Mixing and departures from spherical symmetry the plasma. However, ignition alone is insufficient for ICF can prevent the conditions required for ignition during the power production, which must overcome a factor of 10-20 final stages of the capsule implosion. due to implosion efficiency and a factor of 3-20 due to The fusion yield EF from an ICF capsule is given by driver efficiency. EF = ef<f>M, where ef is the specific energy of fusion One of these factors of 10 can be recovered by (energy per unit mass), <f> is the burn efficiency, and M is increasing the burn efficiency. Compression of the D-T the imploded fuel mass. For D-T fusion at a burn fuel mass makes it feasible, in the laboratory, to achieve temperature between 20 and 40 keV, the burn efficiency is the pr = 3 g/cm2 necessary for (/>=%. For a sphere, approximately M = (4Tr/3){prf/p2. Hence the mass (and driver energy at fixed coupling efficiency) required for a given pr scales as 2 ;! 2 (1) 1/p . For example, at a density of 400 g/cm (plasma pr + 6 g/cm density of 102fi cm"3), a spherical shell with a thickness of where p and r are the compressed fuel density and radius, r/2 and radius r would have pr = 3 g/cm2 with a mass of 5 respectively. Because the inertial confinement time is mg. This mass would be imploded in about 10 nsec, would proportional to r, the fuel areal density pr is equivalent to burn in about 10"'" sec and would have a yield of about the density-confinement time product nr that is used to 6 X 10* J. This yield is readily contained, and at 5-6 pulses describe progress in magnetic confinement fusion. We can per second such targets could drive a 1-gigawatt electric use the burn efficiency given by equation 1 to compare the reactor for power production. requirements of magnetic confinement fusion with those The fuel compression is energetically efficient if the of ICF. D-T remains nearly Fermi degenerate.' Only 6.5 X104 J is PHYSICS TODAY SEPTEMBER, 1992 33 required to compress 5 mg of fuel to 400 g/cm3 in this case, and indirect drive.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laboratory Astrophysics with Lasers Chantal Stehlé
    Laboratory Astrophysics with lasers Chantal Stehlé LERMA (Laboratoire d’Etudes de la Ma4ère et du Rayonnement en Astrophysique et Atmosphères) This work is partly supported by French state funds managed by the ANR within the InvesBssements d'Avenir programme under reference ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02. Plasma astrophysics see for instance Savin et al. « Lab astro white paper », 2010 Perimeter Methods • Microscopic physical • Experiments processes (opacity, EOS) • Theory, databases • • MulBscale, mulphysics Numerical simulaons • Links to observaons processes (e.g. magne4c reconnecon, shock waves, instabili4es …) Tools • Study of large scale scaled • Medium size lab. processes, (e.g. stellar jets) experiments • Large scale faciliBes (lasers and pinches ) • Super-compung ressources OUTLINE • IntroducBon • Stellar Opacity • EOS for gazeous planets • Scaling • Accreon & Ejecon processes in Young Stars • Conclusion Opacity for stellar interiors From Turck Chièze et al. ApSS 2010 4 Opacity An example of opacity : For a optically thick medium, Hydrogen( Stehlé et al 1993) • LTE is ~ valid -> near blackbody radiaon κν/ρ • The monochromac radiave flux Fν ! is proporBonal to the gradient of rad. Energy and to 1/κν (The radia4on tends to escape from regions where κν is low, ie between lines) hν • The frequency averaged flux <F> is linked to the Rosseland opacity κR. 1 3 dν dB (T) / dT 16 σ T dT 1 ∫ κ ν < F > = and = ν d dB (T) / dT 3 κ R dz κ R ∫ ν ν 5 CEPHEIDS: the enigma Strong periodic (P~ 1 – 50 days) Rela4on P-L : variaons of luminosity L, Teff, and distance calibrator radius. Enveloppe 2 The pulsaon (κ mechanism) log(κR in g/cm ) 2 • in the external part of the stellar envelope 1.5 • linked to an increase of the opacity 1 4 6 -7 -2 3 0.5 10 < T < 10 K (10 < ρ < 10 g/cm ) 0 Hence radiaon is blocked in the internal layers, -> heang -> expansion and beang Core 34 32 30 28 log(External Mass in g ) 2 In the 90’, no code was able Temperature in K, κ in cm /g for M* = 5 M8, Y=0.25, Z=0.08, to reproduce the pulsa6on.
    [Show full text]
  • Inertial Fusion Power Development:Path for Global Warming Suppression
    Inertial Fusion Power Development:Path for Global Warming Suppression EU:France, UK,etc. US: LLNL, SNL, U. Rochester East Asia: Japan, China,etc. Kunioki Mima Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University IAEA- FC 2008, 50 years’ Ann. of Fusion Res. , Oct.15, 2008, Geneva, SW Outline • Brief introduction and history of IFE research • Frontier of IFE researches Indirect driven ignition by NIF/LMJ Ignition equivalent experiments for fast ignition • IF reactor concept and road map toward power plant IFE concepts Several concepts have been explored in IFE. Driver Irradiation Ignition Laser Direct Central hot spark Ignition HIB Indirect Fast ignition Impact ignition Pulse power Shock ignition The key issue of IFE is implosion physics which has progressed for more than 30 years Producing 1000times solid density and 108 degree temperature plasmas Plasma instabilities R Irradiation non-uniformities Thermal transport and ablation surface of fuel pellet ΔR R-M Instability ΔR0 R-T instability R0 R Feed through R-M and R-T Instabilities in deceleration phase Turbulent Mixing Canter of fuel pellet t Major Laser Fusion Facilities in the World NIF, LLNL, US. LMJ, CESTA, Bordeaux, France SG-III, Menyang,CAEP, China GXII-FIREX, ILE, Osaka, Japan OMEGA-EP, LLE, Rochester, US HiPER, RAL, UK Heavy Ion Beam Fusion: The advanced T-lean fusion fuel reactor Test Stand at LBNL NDCX-I US HIF Science Virtual National Lab.(LBNL, LLNL,PPPL) has been established in 1990. (Directed by G Logan) • Implosion physics by HIB • HIB accelerator technology for 1kA, 1GeV, 1mm2 beam: Beam brightness, Neutralization, NDCX II Collective effects of high current beam, Stripping.(R.Davidson etal) • Reactor concept with Flibe liquid jet wall (R.Moir: HYLIF for HIF Reactor) History of IFE Research 1960: Laser innovation (Maiman) 1972: Implosion concept (J.
    [Show full text]
  • 1958 Geneva Conference on the Discontinuation of Nuclear Weapons
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Presidential Decisions on Stockpile Stewardship Test-Based Stewardship and the Cold War Transitioning to Stockpile Stewardship Science: Research, Development, and Technology Deterrence and the Life Extension Program Global Nuclear Security Timeline of U.S. Stockpile Stewardship Innovation The Path Forward Today, I am announcing my “decision to negotiate a true zero-yield comprehensive test ban.” U.S. President Bill Clinton, August 11, 1995 The National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 1994 (P.L. 103-160) estab- lished the Stockpile Stewardship Program (SSP) to sustain the nuclear deterrent in the absence of nuclear explosive testing. The SSP supports U.S. national security missions through leading-edge scientific, engineering, and technical tools and expertise – a U.S. response to the end of the Cold War and the need to remake the global nuclear landscape. One year later, on August 11, 1995, Presi- dent Bill Clinton announced that the United States would support a “zero yield” Compre- hensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT): “I am assured by the Secretary of Energy and the Directors of our nu- clear weapons labs that we can meet the challenge of maintaining our nuclear deterrent under a Compre- hensive Test-Ban Treaty through a Science-Based Stockpile Stewardship program without nuclear testing.” This year, the Nation and the Department of Energy (DOE) celebrate the 20th anniver- sary of that announcement and the scientific and technical capabilities that have devel- oped to support this policy direction. The national investment in stockpile stewardship has enabled resolution of many stockpile issues and provided more detailed knowledge than what could have been attained through nuclear explosive testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Laser Technology
    Nova Laser Technology In building the Nova laser, we have significantly advanced many technologies, including the generation and propagation of laser beams. We have also developed innovations in the fields of alignment, diagnostics, computer control, and image processIng.• For further information contact Nova is the world's most powerful at least 10 to 30 times more energetic John F. Holzrichter (415) 423-7454. laser system. It is designed to heat and than Shiva would be needed to compress small targets, typically 0.1 cm investigate ignition conditions and in size, to conditions otherwise produced possibly to reach gains near unity. only in nuclear weapons or in the Because of the importance of such a interior of stars. Its beams can facility to the progress of inertial fusion concentrate 80 to 120 kJ of energy (in research and because of the construction 3 ns) or 80 to 120 TW of power (in time entailed (at least five to seven 100 ps) on such targets. To couple energy years), the Nova project was proposed to more favorably with the target, Nova's the Energy Research and Development laser light will be harmonically converted Administration and to Congress. It was with greater than 50% efficiency from its decided to base this system on the near-infrared fundamental wavelength proven master-oscillator, linear-amplifier­ (1.05-,um wavelength) to green (0.525- chain laser system used on the Argus ,um) or blue (0.35-,um) wavelengths. The and Shiva systems. We had great goals of our experiments with Nova are confidence in extending this to make accurate measurements of high­ neodymium-glass laser technology to the temperature and high-pressure states of 200- to 300-kJ level.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGINEERING DESIGN of the NOVA LASER FACILITY for By
    ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE NOVA LASER FACILITY FOR INERTIAL-CONFINEMENT FUSION* by W. W. Simmons, R. 0. Godwin, C. A. Hurley, E. P. Wallerstein, K. Whitham, J. E. Murray, E. S. Bliss, R. G. Ozarski. M. A. Summers, F. Rienecker, D. G. Gritton, F. W. Holloway, G. J. Suski, J. R. Severyn, and the Nova Engineering Team. Abstract The design of the Nova Laser Facility for inertia! confinement fusion experiments at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is presented from an engineering perspective. Emphasis is placed upon design-to- performance requirements as they impact the various subsystems that comprise this complex experimental facility. - DISCLAIMER - CO;.T-CI104n--17D DEf;2 013.375 *Research performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract number W-7405-ENG-48. Foreword The Nova Laser System for Inertial Confinement Fusion studies at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories represents a sophisticated engineering challenge to the national scientific and industrial community, embodying many disciplines - optical, mechanical, power and controls engineering for examples - employing state-of-the-art components and techniques. The papers collected here form a systematic, comprehensive presentation of the system engineering involved in the design, construction and operation of the Nova Facility, presently under construction at LLNL and scheduled for first operations in 1985. The 1st and 2nd Chapters present laser design and performance, as well as an introductory overview of the entire system; Chapters 3, 4 and 5 describe the major engineering subsystems; Chapters 6, 7, 8 and 9 document laser and target systems technology, including optical harmonic frequency conversion, its ramifications, and its impact upon other subsystems; and Chapters 10, 11, and 12 present an extensive discussion of our integrated approach to command, control and communications for the entire system.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum to Participants JASON 1994 Summer Study
    Hydronnclear Testing and the Comprehensive Test Ban: Memorandum to Participants JASON 1994 Summer Study Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 1350 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel (main): (202) 783-7800 Cochran (direct dial): (202) 624-9329 Paine (direct dial): (202) 624-9350 Fax: (202) 783-5917 INTERNET: [email protected] Although no commonly accepted defInition exists, a "hydronuclear test" may be generally described as a nuclear weapons test, or high-explosive driven criticality experiment, characterized by a nuclear energy release that is insuffIcient to heat the core material to the plasma temperatures that would cause it to explode "like a bomb." In such a test, the TNT equivalent energy release from fission would therefore not exceed the amount released by the chemical high explosive used to compress the fIssile material, and could be considerably ,less. Nuclear-weapon states, and possibly other states, also perform high-explosive driven implosion experiments using fusjon material, although" these' are not nonnally characterized as "hydronuclear tests". Hydronuclear tests can serve a useful role in the development of the full spectrum of unboosted fIssion weapons, including'first generation nuclear weapons of the implosion type with yields in the 5 to 30 kiloton range, more sophisticated designs with yields up to about a megaton, and advanced micro-nuclear weapons with yields of 5 to 500 tons. For pure fIssion weapons hydronuclear tests can be used to:' * optimize the timing of initiation of the
    [Show full text]
  • James Clerk Maxwell Prize for Plasma Physics Salt
    Salt Lake City, Utah A Division of The American Physical Society November 14-18, 2011 James Clerk Maxwell Prize He is the recipient of a number of stationed at CERN full-time since 2001. Fajans has been a Miller Fellow at for Plasma Physics important prizes and awards including He is a founding member of the ATHENA Berkeley, a National Science Foundation the Patten Prize, Bavarian Innovation antihydrogen collaboration and was the Presidential Young Investigator, and "For Pioneering, and seminal contributions Prize, Wissenschaftpreis of the German Physics Coordinator of the experiment that an Office of Naval Research Young to, the field of dusty plasmas, including “Stifterverband”, ERC research grant, produced the first cold antihydrogen atoms Investigator. He is a fellow of the work leading to the discovery of Gagarin Medal, Ziolkowski Medal, NASA at the CERN Antiproton Decelerator in American Physical Society, and served on plasma crystals, to an explanation for achievement awards, URGO Foundation 2002. He is the founder and Spokesperson the Executive Committee of the Division of the complicated structure of Saturn's for Advances in Dermatology Award of the ALPHA collaboration, which Plasma Physics. rings, and to microgravity dusty plasma (plasma treatment of chronic wounds). demonstrated trapping of antihydrogen experiments conducted first on parabolic- atoms in 2010 (the work which is being trajectory flights and then on the honored here). Hangst was elected to Mike Charlton International Space Station." Salt Lake Fun Facts: fellowship of the APS, Division of Plasma Swansea University, United Kingdom Gregor Morfill The people of Salt Lake City consume Physics, in 2005. Max-Planck Institute für more Jell-O per capita than any other city Mike Charlton Extraterrestrische Physik in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Plasma Physics Research: a Fifty-Year Perspective from 1958 to 2008-Ronald C
    • At the Forefront of Plasma Physics Publishing for 50 Years - with the launch of Physics of Fluids in 1958, AlP has been publishing ar In« the finest research in plasma physics. By the early 1980s it had St t 5 become apparent that with the total number of plasma physics­ related articles published in the journal- afigure then approaching 5,000 - asecond editor would be needed to oversee contributions in this field. And indeed in 1982 Fred L. Ribe and Andreas Acrivos were tapped to replace the retiring Fran~ois Frenkiel, Physics of Fluids' founding editor. Dr. Ribe assumed the role of editor for the plasma physics component of the journal and Dr. Acrivos took on the fluid Editor Ronald C. Davidson dynamics papers. This was the beginning of an evolution that would see Physics of Fluids Resident Associate Editor split into Physics of Fluids A and B in 1989, and culminate in the launch of Physics of Stewart J. Zweben Plasmas in 1994. Assistant Editor Sandra L. Schmidt Today, Physics of Plasmas continues to deliver forefront research of the very Assistant to the Editor highest quality, with a breadth of coverage no other international journal can match. Pick Laura F. Wright up any issue and you'll discover authoritative coverage in areas including solar flares, thin Board of Associate Editors, 2008 film growth, magnetically and inertially confined plasmas, and so many more. Roderick W. Boswell, Australian National University Now, to commemorate the publication of some of the most authoritative and Jack W. Connor, Culham Laboratory Michael P. Desjarlais, Sandia National groundbreaking papers in plasma physics over the past 50 years, AlP has put together Laboratory this booklet listing many of these noteworthy articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Safety Plan
    RADIATION SAFETY PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOVA SOUTHEASTERN HEALTH AND SAFETY UNIVERSITY POLICY/PROCEDURE POLICY/PROCEDURE TITLE: Radiation Safety Plan NUMBER: 9 DOCUMENT HISTORY OWNER: Facilities Management/AHIS Date: 1 Sept 2011 APPROVED: NSU Radiation Safety Committee Date: 1 Sept 2011 IMPLEMENTED: Date: 1 Oct 2010 RETIRED: Date: Date: Revision No. Review / Changes Reviewer 1/2017 1 Remove Gamma Irradiator reference RSO-5 form RSC 1/2017 2 Change EHS Committee to Radiation Safety RSC Committee (RSC) 1/2017 3 Change references from EHS to RSO RSC 4/2019 4 Edit section 5.4 to remove shipping building RSO RADIATION SAFETY PLAN RADIATION SAFETY PLAN Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................ 4 Section 2: Biological Effects and Exposure Protection ......................................................... 9 Section 3: Responsibilities ................................................................................................. 12 Section 4: License Requirements ....................................................................................... 15 Section 5: Authorization and Procurement of Radioactive Materials ................................ 16 Section 6: Training ............................................................................................................. 19 Section 7: Personnel Monitoring and Occupational Dose Limits ....................................... 22 Section 8: Signs and Labels ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dangerous Thermonuclear Quest: the Potential of Explosive Fusion Research for the Development of Pure Fusion Weapons
    Dangerous Thermonuclear Quest: The Potential of Explosive Fusion Research for the Development of Pure Fusion Weapons Arjun Makhijani, Ph.D. Hisham Zerriffi July 1998 Minor editing revisions made in 2003. Table of Contents Preface i Summary and Recommendations v Summary of Findings vi Recommendations vii Chapter 1: Varieties of Nuclear Weapons 1 A. Historical Background 1 B. Converting Matter into Energy 4 C. Fission energy 5 D. Fusion energy 8 E. Fission-fusion weapons 16 Chapter 2: Inertial Confinement Fusion Basics 19 A. Deposition of driver energy 24 B. Driver requirements 25 C. Fuel pellet compression 27 D. Thermonuclear ignition 29 Chapter 3: Various ECF Schemes 31 A. Laser Drivers 32 B. Ion Beam Drivers 34 1. Heavy Ion Beams 35 a. Induction Accelerators 36 b. Radio-Frequency Accelerators 36 2. Light Ion Beams 37 C. Z-pinch 39 D. Chemical Explosives 40 E. Advanced materials manufacturing 42 1. Nanotechnology 42 2. Metallic Hydrogen 45 Chapter 4: The Prospects for Pure Fusion Weapons 47 A. Requirements for pure fusion weapons 47 B. Overall assessment of non-fission-triggered nuclear weapons 48 1. Ignition 48 2. Drivers 53 C. Overall technical prognosis for non-fission triggered nuclear weapons 54 D. Fusion power and fusion weapons - comparative requirements 56 Chapter 5: Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues Related to Explosive Confinement Fusion 59 A. The Science Based Stockpile Stewardship Program 62 1. Reliability 62 a. Reliability definition 63 b. Future reliability problems 64 c. Relevance of NIF to reliability of the current stockpile 65 2. The US laser fusion program as a weapons development program 65 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Three-Axis Cylindrical Hohlraum Designed
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A novel three-axis cylindrical hohlraum designed for inertial confinement fusion ignition Received: 19 May 2016 Longyu Kuang1,2,3, Hang Li1,2,3, Longfei Jing1, Zhiwei Lin1, Lu Zhang1, Liling Li1, Accepted: 12 September 2016 Yongkun Ding1,2,3,4, Shaoen Jiang1,2,3,4, Jie Liu3,4,5 & Jian Zheng2,4 Published: 05 October 2016 A novel ignition hohlraum for indirect-drive inertial confinement fusion is proposed, which is named three-axis cylindrical hohlraum (TACH). TACH is a kind of 6 laser entrance holes (LEHs) hohlraum, which is orthogonally jointed of three cylindrical hohlraums. Laser beams are injected through every entrance hole with the same incident angle of 55°. A view-factor simulation result shows that the time-varying drive asymmetry of TACH is less than 1.0% in the whole drive pulse period without any supplementary technology. Coupling efficiency of TACH is close to that of 6 LEHs spherical hohlraum with corresponding size. Its plasma-filling time is close to that of typical cylindrical ignition hohlraum. Its laser plasma interaction has as low backscattering as the outer cone of the cylindrical ignition hohlraum. Therefore, TACH combines most advantages of various hohlraums and has little predictable risk, providing an important competitive candidate for ignition hohlraum. In indirect-drive Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF), laser beams are injected into a high-Z hohlraum through laser entrance holes (LEHs) and are converted into X-ray radiation, then the radiation irradiates a low-Z capsule in the center of the hohlraum to bring the central fuel in the capsule to ignition conditions1–6.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the National Research Council Study an Assessment Of
    National Research Council Assessment --ProspectsProspects for Inertial Fusion Energy Status of the Study “An Assessment of the Prospects for Inertial Fusion Energy” Ronald C. Davidson and Gerald L. Kulcinski, Co-Chairs Prepared for the 2012 International Symposium on Heavy Ion Fusion August 13, 2012 A Broad Study – Concepts and Technical Challenges for Inertial Fusion Energy ` Driver ` Chamber ` Lasers, heavy ions, pulsed ` Tritium handling. power, other approaches, --- . ` Capsule injection and ` Requires high repetition rates manufacturing. and heat handling capabilities. ` Significant neutron ` Ignition bombardment. ` Hot spot versus fast ignition. ` WllWall ma teri ilals an ddd des ign. ` Indirect versus direct drive. ` Implementation ` Understand underlying high ` Environment and safety. energy density (HED) physical ` Cost competitiveness. processes. ` Public acceptance. 2 Statement of Task (for the Committee) ` The Committee will prepare a Report that: ` Assesses the prospects for generating power using Inertial Confinement Fusion; ` Identifies the scientific and engineering challenges, cost targets, and R&D objectives associated with developing an Inertial Fusion Energy demonstration plant; and ` Advises the U.S. Department of Energy on the preparation of an R&D roadmap aimed at developing the conceptual design of an Inertial Fusion Energy (IFE) demonstration plant. ` The Committee will also prepare an interim report to inform future year planning by the federal government. 3 Statement of Task (for the Target Panel) ` Target Physics Panel ` Requires access to classified target physics information. ` Will inform the Main Committee on the relevant target physics issues. ` The major task activity for the Target Physics Panel is to: Assess the current performance of various fusion target technologies. Describe the R&D challenges to providing suitable targets on the basis of parameters estblihdtablished and provid iddbthCed by the Committ ee.
    [Show full text]