DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring 2006 Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spring 2006 Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter 'ltbe <!&xforb Newsletter A Publication of the Shakespeare Oxford Society "Dedicated to Researching and Honoring the True Bard" Vol. 4 2: No. 2 "I am not what I am. " Othello Ii S ring 2006 Did Shakespeare OXFORD AND THE Read From FIRST BLACKFRIARS t he 17th Earl of Part Two of Dr. Davis's previous article: "William O:xford's Personal Shakspere, Oxford, Elizabethan Actors, and Playhouses" Library? As near as can be determined conclu- open it up to the public who would pay to sively, Oxford was involved directly in only see these "practice" plays. He obtained W. Ron Hess, one Elizabethan playhouse, and that was his lease from Sir William More who had assisted by Alan Tarica the "first" Blackfriars, the third dedicated acquired the property from Lord Cobham theater established in Elizabethan times. The who in turn had procured it from Sir Henry A real-life, reading, writing, history of this playhouse is most interesting Neville. It is interesting that Neville ap- book-owning Bard: and certainly relevant to our discussion, parently helped (through his connections) clearly introducing Oxford into the theater Fan'ant with the acquisition. Orle of our greatest Oxfordian advantages world. Farrant consummated the lease from is that::: the 17th Earl of Ox ford demonstrably To begin, we need to recall that Black- More on December 20, 1576, and pro- read a.nd wrote, whereas the family of Mr. friars was a monastery for the Dominican ceeded to renovate the property, causing Shaks pere of Stratford were afflicted with (or "Black") friars until Henry VIII broke him to become seriously indebted. (In a "cong enital illiteracy" (quoth Irv Matus in a with the Catholic Church (or vice versa), and subsequent law suit, More complained that 1994 d ebate), and there is little to contradict Henry either destroyed or confiscated the the renovations had put the property into a the ia:ference that Mr. Shakspere was illiter- monasteries ofEngland as he did with Black- state of "great ruin.") For the "training" of ate to<). As to "Shakespeare," the author of friars in 1538. He presented (by "letting") boy actors, Farrant sought to combine the the w o rks we cherish, there's little doubt that Blackfriars to his supportive aristocrats so Children of Windsor with the Children of he rea d and wrote "in over-plus," not just in that during Elizabeth's reign the properties the Royal Chapel for whom William Hunnis English but also in Latin, French, Italian, were held privately. Blackfriars was in an was master. In 1580, Moore was planning and p ossibly Spanish. Moreover, whole upscale area of west London (at the time) action against Farrant for utilizing the prop- (cont'donp.13) (Adams 91-110), and though it was within erty continually as a playhouse, not just for the city wall, it was under the jurisdiction rehearsal. Unfortunately, this was the year of the crown as opposed to the Council of Farrant died. Anne Farrant, his widow, was • INSIDE· London. It consisted of a number of build- now saddled with the debt problem without Pres i dent's LetterlEditorial Greeting 2 ings and numerous gardens. In and around the ability to run the theater. She wrote a SOS & SF Joint Conference 3 the property lived important gentry such as letter to More asking permission to sublet Pers onal Adventures with the Lord Cobham and the French ambassador. the premise, which she did, although later Autborship Question 4 Numerous court activities had occurred More denied giving such permission. The Re i ew of the Annual Meeting there during Henry VIII's reign including widow made a formal lease (sublet) in De- of th e De Vere Society 7 the hearing of the case against Catherine cember, 1580 to William Hunnis and John Letters to the Editor 9 of Aragon and later the Parliament hearing Newman for £20 l3s 4d per annum. This The "Prince Tudor" Hypothesis 10 charges against Cardinal Wolsey. was a little over £6 that she had to pay More A S 1.Iarp B lade, a Tall Man Following the success of James Bur- for her lease. In 1583, Hunnis and Newman and a Good Whore? 19 bage's Theater and Curtain in 1576-7, a transferred their lease to a Welshman, Henry Anto ny and Cleopatra: Richard Farrant sought to convert one of Evans. This was done without More's con- the Voices 22 the buildings to an enclosed playhouse. His sent and constituted a definite breach of the Review: "Searching for Shakespeare" ostensible plan was to use the playhouse original lease agreement. More declared the Exh.ibition 26 for practicing of the Children of the Royal original lease invalid, but Evans, who was Oxt<:>rdian Archives 28 Chapel, but to no one's surprise, he would (cont'd on p. 5) page 2 Spring 2006 Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter Shakespeare Oxford President's Page Newsletter Published quarterly by the Dear Fellow Shakespeare Lovers: cal schools and community groups; Shakespeare Oxford Society Sponsor a series oflectures or confer- P.O. Box 1854 Countdown to the ences on the authorship question; Seek funding fi'om individuals, and Silver Spring, MD 20902 Ann Arbor Conference foundations to support our ongoing Tel: (301) 946-8333 educational and outreach programs. Fax: (301)946-1313 (November 9-12, 2006) Please share any ideas you have about how Email: [email protected] It's hard to believe our conference in Ann best to mark our Golden Anniversary. ISSN 1525-6863 Arbor is only three months away! www.shakespeare-oxford.com This will be our second joint confer- New Yahoo! Email ence with the Shakespeare Fellowship. Editors: We're hoping for a great turnout from both Discussion Group Lew Tate organizations, as well as from as many non- The Board of Directors recently voted to Editorial Board: members as we can attract. A big draw for create a new Shakespeare Oxford Society Dr. Frank Davis this conference - in fact one of the main discussion group on Yahoo! The group has Susan Sybersma reasons we opted for this venue during these now been created and all SOS members Ramon Jimenez dates - is the presence at the University of are invited to participate. Simply visit Brian Bechtold Michigan of famed Shakespearean actor ShakespeareOxfordSociety-su bscri be@ ya- Dr. James Brooks Patrick Stewart and the Royal Shakespeare hoogroups.com to subscribe to the group. Joe Peel Company the same week of our conference. Let me be clear: This new Yahoo! group is James Sherwood We're exploring the technological feasibility exclusively for members of the Shakespeare Dr. Richard Smiley of "beaming up" Patrick Stewart and others Oxford Society, about the Shakespeare Layout and Printing from the RSC into our conference. More Oxford Society. There are other groups out St. Martin de Porres Lay Dominicans on that later! there for broader discussions regarding the New Hope, Kentucky We have secured tickets for conference All contents copyright © 2006 participants (maximum of three tickets per (collt'd all p. 25) Shakespeare Oxford Society registrant) for Julius Caesar (Thursday The Newsletter welcomes research articles, book evening), The Tempest (Friday evening), reviews, letters and news items. Contributions and Antony alld Cleopatra (Saturday eve- GREETINGS should be reasonably concise and, when appro- ning). Please see the Registration insert or priate, validated by peer review. Assignment of Whereas we have many words to fit in the SOS website for more details. These copyright is required for publication. The views the newsletter, and whereas brevity is the tickets are in great demand, so I encourage of contributors do not necessarily reflect those of soul of wit, ... the Shakespeare Oxford Society as a literary and you to register and order your tickets as I wish to thank the scholars/writers for educational organization. soon as possible. the tremendous content of this issue. Also, Another Countdown - Our several of them deserve thanks for adjust- ing to a hurry-up deadline enabling us to 50th Anniversary in 2007 Board of Trustees inch closer to a reasonable schedule. If you Shakespeare Oxford Society Over the next several months, your Board are working on a project for the 'summer" Lifetime HOllorary Trustees of Directors and hopefully all members newsletter, try for a mid September sub- Dr. Gordon Cyr and Charles Boyle of the Society will be exploring ideas for mission. While on submissions: a) if at all 2006 celebrating our 50th anniversary next year. possible, please submit digitally; b) please President: Matthew Cossolotto I hope we will all take this opportunity to use MLA, particularly in documentation; First Vice President: Dr. C. Wayne Shore "Think Big" so we make the most of the c) if not MLA, please indicate the format Second Vice President: John Hamill "golden" PR and marketing opportunities you are using and stick with that format; offered by our Golden Anniversary in 2007. d) please remember that you can report on Treasurer: Virginia Hyde Among other things, we should consider: DeVerestudies activities, educational strate- James Sherwood Setting an ambitious goal forexpand- gies, personal experiences; e) keep digging. Dr. Frank Davis ing our membership; Michael Pisapia You may be the one to find the document, Marking the anniversary year with Randall Sherman authenticated by your good work, that says, Dr. Richard Smiley a series of special authorship and "I am damn tired of writing the name of that Oxford-related "Hot Topics" publica- Elliot Stone rube from Podunk, Warwickshire." tions; Susan Sybersma Signed, Edward Oxen ford Dr. Richard Joyrich Establishing an active Speakers Bu- reau ofmembers willing to speak to 10- Lew Tate, ed. tate321I @bellsouth.net Shalce speare Oxford Newsletter Spring 2006 page 3 SOS and SF Joint Conference November 9-12, 2006 in Ann Arbor, Michigan T h e Ann Arbor Authorship Conference,jointly sponsored by the the hotels directly and mention either the SOS or the Shakespeare Shake speare Oxford Society and the Shakespeare Fellowship, will Fellowship.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • It Would, to Put It Mildly, Be Nice to Know More About the Backstage Oper- Ations of a Playing Company Like the Chamberlain’S Men Or the Admiral’S in the Later 1590S
    Early Theatre 10.1 (2007) ANDREW GURR The Work of Elizabethan Plotters, and 2 The Seven Deadly Sins It would, to put it mildly, be nice to know more about the backstage oper- ations of a playing company like the Chamberlain’s Men or the Admiral’s in the later 1590s. About the company that Shakespeare joined in 1594 we are unlikely ever to know much more than the few hard facts now current can tell us. But given Henslowe’s Diary with its intricate records of the day-by- day operations of Edward Alleyn and his company, there is better reason to hope for some clarification of the extraordinary processes that helped fifteen or more players to put six different plays on stage every week and to run a repertory consisting of more than thirty plays each year. Regrettably little about that uniquely high-speed process has come out so far, and this study of the backstage book-keeper and stage management will not take it very much further. But, as the chronic optimists say, every little helps. The Admiral’s company must have had several helpers for the staging of their plays besides the costumiers, to whom the Henslowe papers note pay- ments, and the property men. The difficulties of reading the Diary start there. Were the backstage workers employed by Henslowe himself as owner of the playhouse the company rented, or were they members of the company, hired and paid by the sharers? None of the stage hands is named in the accounts, though there are some bonds signed by hired men who were players.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full-Text
    William S h ak e s p e ar e : an overview of his life, times, and work an NAC English Theatre company educational publication THE NATIONAL ARTS CENTRE ENGLISH THEATRE PROGRAMMES FOR STUDENT AUDIENCES Peter Hinton Artistic Director, English Theatre This backgrounder was written and researched by Jane Moore for the National Arts Centre, English Theatre. Copyright Jane Moore, 2008. It may be used solely for educational purposes. The National Arts Centre English Theatre values the feedback of teachers on the content and format of its educational materials. We would appreciate your comments or suggestions on ways to improve future materials. Comments may be directed to Martina Kuska, either by email at [email protected] or fax at (613) 943 1401. Made possible in part by the NAC Foundation Donors’ Circle Table of Contents page(s) Section I: Introduction to Shakespeare............................................................................................1 - 3 William Shakespeare: Who was he, and why do we study him? .................................................1 Shakespeare‘s biography................................................................................................... 1 œ 2 Shakespeare‘s plays .......................................................................................................... 2 œ 3 Section II: Shakespeare and the Sanders Portrait............................................................................ 4 œ 5 What did Shakespeare look like? ..............................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Back to the Future: a Review of Comparative Studies in Shakespeare and the Commedia Dell'arte
    Issues in Review 227 Back to the Future: A Review of Comparative Studies in Shakespeare and the Commedia dell'Arte A wide-ranging, if admittedly not exhaustive, interpretive survey of compara- tive studies of Shakespeare and the commedia dell'arte, which this essay aims to provide, must include several important studies from the early twentieth century because their archival and bibliographic rigour makes them still use- ful points of departure for serious comparative study. Whereas the linear posi- tivistic source study (eg, ‘x influenced y’) that flourished in this early phase of comparative literature no longer compels us living in the age of inter- textuality, a transnational approach to Renaissance theatre should welcome archivally-documented accounts of actors crossing boundaries: the material encounters of international exchange. New work on the Shakespeare-arte question can weave together the archival and the intertextual, which has been richly redefined in recent years for the field of Renaissance drama by Louise George Clubb and other scholars.1 In giving some prolonged attention to early-twentieth-century scholars in the first half of this essay, I will pause over some of the foundational documents published in their studies as interpretive cruxes still meriting discussion. In my discussion of late-twentieth-century scholarship, I will acknowledge ties to the earlier work. Drawing from several late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century archival studies, such as Albert Feuillerat’s 1908 printed edition of documents from the
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 As You Like It
    AS YOU LIKE IT Study Guide - 2011 Season Production E DIRECT AT SPEAK MACBETH THAISAGROW PROSPERO TOUCHSTONE JULIET CRE VIEW TEACH SEE CREATE HAMLET DISCUSS CLEOPATRA SEE LISTEN LAUGHROSALIND PLAY DIRECT SHYLOCKCRE LEARN CAESAR A AT ACT TEACH E OTHELLO OPHELI A Message from the Director are transformed by encountering what is “down the rabbit hole.” stark contrast to Hamlet, As IN You Like It is a play about The forest in Shakespeare’s plays is the metamorphosis of the self. always a place of transformation, a A young woman, Rosalind, is able freeing of the self from rigid societal to discover what love truly is by and parental bonds in order to pretending to be someone else, the find an authentic self. With that boy Ganymede. Through playing in mind, we have made our forest she becomes more and more into a whimsical playground where expansive, bolder and more fully objects, clothes, sound, light and herself. color are literally transformed from what they are in the court. Through Inspiration for the physical imaginative play, the characters production of As You Like It came transform themselves. from stories like The Chronicles of Narnia, Through the Looking Glass, Thank you for celebrating the and Coraline. A door is opened into human spirit with us! another world and the characters 2 Contents Shakespeare’s Life and Times ..................................................4 What Did Shakespeare Look Like? ...........................................4 Shakespeare Portrait Gallery ....................................................5 The
    [Show full text]
  • Coppelia Kahn's Address in Washington, D.C., 2009
    Coppélia Kahn Address in Washington, D.C., 10 April 2009 At last this moment has arrived. Like all the former SAA presidents I know, I’ve been agonizing over it for two years, ever since you were so generous as to elect me vice-president. In states of low, medium and high anxiety I’ve mulled it over on two continents, waking and sleeping; during department meetings, on the exercise bicycle, in the shower and in the supermarket . I’ve juggled various topics in the air: “the battle with the Centaurs,” “the riot of the tipsy Bacchanals, / Tearing the Thracian singer in their rage,” and especially in this bleak economic season, “The thrice three Muses mourning for the death / Of Learning, late deceased in beggary” (Midsummer Night’s Dream 5.1.44-53). I think I remember my immediate predecessor, Peter Holland, whom I have never known to be at a loss for words, describing himself as lying despondent on the living room couch, like the speaker in Sidney’s sonnet, “biting [his] truant pen” and “beating [him]self for spite” as he searched for a topic for his luncheon speech. I’ve been there, too. On March 10, 2009, I was released from this state of desperation by a fast-breaking news story girdling the globe: “Is this a Shakespeare which I see before me?” read the headline on my New York Times, one of many in which reporters would show off their knowledge of Shakespeare by deliberate (or unwitting) misquotation of his words. [On screen: Cobbe portrait] There on the front page was a color photograph of a painting that Stanley Wells, chairman of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, had presented to the world the day before as “almost certainly the only authentic image of Shakespeare made from life” (SBT press release, 3/9/09).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 268–350, 2020 0892-3310/20 RESEARCH ARTICLE Behind The Mask: An Analysis of the Dedication of Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Its Implications for the Shakespeare Authorship Question Peter A. Sturrock Applied Physics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA [email protected] Kathleen E. Erickson School of Information, San José State University, San José, CA [email protected] Submitted September 18, 2019; Accepted January 20, 2020; Published June 15, 2020 https://doi.org/10.31275/2020/1672 Creative Commons License CC-BY-NC A shorter version of this paper was given by Peter Sturrock as the Founder’s Lecture on June 7, 2019, at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Society for Scientific Exploration in Broomfield, Colorado. Abstract—There is at present no consensus concerning the true authorship of the monumental literature that we ascribe to “Shakespeare.” Orthodox scholarship attributes this corpus to a man who was born and who died in Stratford-upon-Avon, who spelled his name William Shakspere (or variants thereof, almost all with a short “a”), who could not write his own name consistently, and who may have been illiterate—as were his parents and as were, essentially, his children. For these and other reasons, many alternative candidates have been proposed. At this date, the leading candidate is Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. We approach the Authorship Issue from a scientific perspective. We frame the key question as that of Secrecy or No Secrecy. According to orthodox scholarship, the Authorship Issue does not involve considerations of secrecy.
    [Show full text]
  • In Love with Shakespeare: Metatextual Potential of John Madden's Fictional
    Volume 10 - Issue 42 / June 2021 103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.42.06.10 How to Cite: Marinesko, V., Lazarenko, D., Torkut, N., & Gutaruk, N. (2021). “Shakespeare in love” / In love with Shakespeare: metatextual potential of John Madden’s fictional biopic. Amazonia Investiga, 10(42), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.42.06.10 “Shakespeare in love” / In love with Shakespeare: metatextual potential of John Madden’s fictional biopic «Закоханий Шекспір» / Закохані в Шекспіра: метатекстуальний потенціал фікційного байопіка Джона Меддена Received: May 2, 2021 Accepted: June 12, 2021 Written by: Viktoriia Marinesko43 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6747-8664 Darya Lazarenko44 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3253-4678 Nataliya Torkut45 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8905-6769 Nataliia Gutaruk46 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7373-5460 Abstract Анотація The paper focuses on the specificity of metatextual Метою статті є дослідження особливостей potential of John Madden’s fictional biopic метатекстуального потенціалу фікційного “Shakespeare in Love” (1998), viewed as a байопіку Джона Меддена “Закоханий Шекспір» complex metatextualintermedial construct. The (1998). Метатекстуальні ресурси фільму metatextual resources of the film are being analysed реалізовані у 3 ключових площинах: on three key levels: intratextual (metatextual інтратекстуальній (метатекстуальні фрагменти), fragments), intertextual (allusions to the other інтертекстуальній (звернення до інших творів works of the canon) and extratextual (text as an канону) та позатекстуальній (в якій текст є intersemiotic metatext). On the intratextual level інтерсеміотичним метатекстом). На four main forms of metatextual commentary are інтратекстуальному рівні виділяються чотири singled out: a) the paratextual commentary; b) the основні форми мета текстуальних коментарів: leitmotif; c) the self-referential fragments; d) the а)пара текстуальний коментар; б) лейтмотив; в) allusions to the present-day realia.
    [Show full text]
  • London Theaters in the 16Th Century
    London Theaters in the 16th Century Commercial Theaters Before the building of theaters specifically designed for theatrical performances, professional acting companies performed in inn yards or other suitable buildings. The Famous Victories of Henry the Fifth, for instance, was performed by the Queen's Men at the Bull Inn (on/before 1588). The first theater erected specifically for the purpose of performing plays was The Theatre, built by James Burbage in 1576 (see below). Blackfriars Theater: Part of a medieval monastery, Blackfriars Priory. Unlike other theaters, Blackfriars Theater had a roof. Its admission fees were high, and audiences wealthier, more socially prominent and better educated than the average playgoer. Smaller than other theaters, with a candle-lit stage, Blackfriars was considered a "private" theater. Affiliations: Combined Children of the Chapel/Paul's Children (early 1580's-1584), led by Henry Evans (assisted by Edward De Vere, Earl of Oxford) with plays by the gifted John Lyly performed at Blackfriars and at Court; James Burbage and his sons held the lease from 1584; Children of the Chapel (1600-09); King's Men (1609-) Curtain Theater (1577): Second London playhouse, probably built by Henry Laneman. Round or multi-sided three-story building, located in Shoreditch near The Theatre near the neighborhood of Curtain Close. Last mentioned in 1627. Affiliations: Strange's Men (1590-92); Lord Chamberlain's Men (1597-98). Queen's Men (1603-1609). Fortune Theatre (1600): Built in a northern London suburb by Philip Henslowe and William Alleyn. Built to rival the Globe and in the same general manner. A status of the Goddess of Fortune presided over the entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Travels and Texts of the Shakespearean Company
    AN EXAMINATION OF THE TRAVELS AND TEXTS OF THE SHAKESPEAREAN COMPANY i A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AND THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE KANSAS STATE TEACHERS COLLEGE OF EMPORIA IN PARTIAL FULFILlMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY DARYL E. TROYER July, 1965 Approved for the Major Department .~.~ Approved' for the Graduate Counoil ...­ ~;~~:~.J'} i·~/.~ S PREFACE Throughout the centuries since Shakespeare lived, soholars have delved into almost every conceivable aspect of his life and work, and the age which produced them. But, in spite of the vast amount of research that has been done, many important areas remain underdeveloped or subject to further investigation. One such field is the provincial travels of the company of actors with which Shakespeare was associated and the problems that these tours involved. Several works, including J. T. Murray's English Dramatic Companies, Sir E. K. Chambers's The Elizabethan Stage, A. Thaler's series of artioles on travelling players, and Glynne Wickham's Early English Stages, oontain valuable examinations of aspeots of provinoial dramatic activity and are basic to any examination of this SUbject. The need that exists is to collect the various view­ points on the travels and texts of the Shakespearean oompany. To achieve the goal of a oomprehensive look at the many con­ siderations of the travelling company is the aim of this study. For aid in making this project a reality, this writer wishes to express particular gratitude to two individuals: Dr. Charles E. Walton, through whose inspiration and advice the study took shape; and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • And Theatrical Apprenticeship
    Early Theatre 14.1 (2011) David Kathman The Seven Deadly Sins and Theatrical Apprenticeship In his 2007 article ‘The Work of Elizabethan Plotters, and 2 The Seven Deadly Sins’, Andrew Gurr surveyed the evidence concerning the handful of surviving manuscript ‘plots’ from the Elizabethan theatre, adding some judicious speculation about the ‘plotters’ who drew up these documents.1 Such plots are key pieces of evidence for the casting practices of Elizabethan playing companies, since they include the names of specific players alongside the roles they played. Because very little concrete evidence exists about these plots or their plotters, as Gurr rightly notes, any effort to bring together the meagre known facts into a coherent narrative is most welcome. Aside from the room for disagreement with some elements of Gurr’s narrative, as is almost inevitable in speculative cases such as this one, the framework Gurr has constructed is a helpful supplement to the pioneering work of W.W. Greg nearly eighty years ago.2 The second half of Gurr’s article argues a more specific proposition: that the manuscript plot of The Second Part of the Seven Deadly Sins, now Dulwich College MS XIX, was written for a production by Strange’s Men around 1591. This assumption was something close to a consensus view until recently, but in a 2004 article, henceforth Kathman (2004), I argued at length that this dating is mistaken, and that the plot actually originated with the Lord Chamberlain’s Men around 1597–8.3 In order to defend the earlier date, Gurr necessarily challenges some of the arguments presented in that article, the tacit hypothesis being that if those arguments are invalid, then the trad- itional date is correct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seven Deadly Sins</Em>
    Early Theatre 7.1 (2004) David Kathman Reconsidering The Seven Deadly Sins Among the Henslowe-Alleyn papers at Dulwich College is a document long prized by theatre historians: the handwritten ‘plot’ of a play called The Second Part of the Seven Deadly Sins (Dulwich College MS XIX), apparently designed to be hung on a peg backstage at a playhouse. The text of this play does not survive, but it is usually thought to be identical with Richard Tarlton’s ‘famous play of the seauen Deadly sinnes’, referred to in 1592 by Gabriel Harvey and Thomas Nashe.1 The plot is extremely valuable for its scene-by-scene descrip- tion of the play’s action, which lists the characters and (most of) the players who played those characters in each scene. There are twenty players’ names in all: Mr. Brian, Mr. Phillipps, Mr. Pope, R. Burbadg, W. Sly, R. Cowly, John Duke, Ro. Pallant, John Sincler, Tho. Goodale, John Holland, T. Belt, Ro. Go., Harry, Kit, Vincent, Saunder, Nick, Ned, and Will. In addition, two major roles (King Henry VI and Lydgate) and several minor ones are not accompanied by any player’s name. Since this is the most complete cast list we have for any performance of a pre-restoration play, it has often been used as evidence in reconstructing the history of Elizabethan playing companies, as well as the careers of the individual players named therein.2 One problem is that the company which performed this play is nowhere named in the plot. For more than a century, most theatre historians have assumed that the company in question was some version of Lord Strange’s Men performing in the early 1590s.
    [Show full text]
  • “Here Lay My Hope”: Attribution, Collaboration
    “HERE LAY MY HOPE”: ATTRIBUTION, COLLABORATION, AND THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE THIRD ADDITION TO THE SPANISH TRAGEDY Keegan Cooper Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of English, Indiana University October 2016 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee ______________________________________ Dr. Terri Bourus, Chair ______________________________________ Dr. Jonathan Eller ______________________________________ Dr. April Witt ii Dedication For Mom, who first introduced me to Shakespeare and inspired me to imagine and create. For Char, Beeg, and Pops. Without your company and counsel, this thesis might not have been completed. iii Acknowledgements A huge thank you to my thesis committee: Dr. Jonathan Eller and Dr. April Witt. Your feedback in and out of class has been vital these past few years. And I cannot thank my mentors enough: my thesis chair, Dr. Terri Bourus, and Dr. Gary Taylor. Without your support and guidance over the past three years, I would not have been able to finish my educational career as successfully as I have. (And thanks for employing me too!) iv Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part 1: Backstory 3 Part 2: Control Tests 19 First Segment 25 Second Segment 42 Part 3: Conclusion 50 Bibliography 52 Curriculum Vitae v Introduction The authorship of the five additions to Thomas Kyd’s The Spanish Tragedy remains a conundrum. Ben Jonson was first thought responsible, but a majority of scholars argue against his involvement.
    [Show full text]