DOCSLIB.ORG

Thursday, October 2, 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thursday, October 2, 1997 CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 009 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, October 2, 1997 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the followingaddress: http://www.parl.gc.ca 367 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, October 2, 1997 The House met at 10 a.m. Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, thank you for the opportunity to _______________ provide additional information for your consideration of the question of privilege raised by the member for Wild Rose. Prayers The member for Wild Rose alleges that an official of the _______________ Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development deliber- ately misled him and subsequently denied him information to D (1000) which he was entitled as a member of Parliament, thus constituting a contempt of Parliament. This is not the case. I wish to put before [English] the House an outline of my understanding of what occurred that day and the rationale for the official’s actions. POINTS OF ORDER On August 29, 1997 my staff offered to have senior departmental COMMENTS DURING QUESTION PERIOD officials from the Alberta region provide the member for Wild The Speaker: Colleagues, before we begin with orders of the Rose with a briefing on the initiatives being undertaken by the day, I have received notification from the hon. member for department in the Stony community. While I cannot speak to the Burnaby—Douglas. Yesterday we had an incident in the House specifics of the hon. member’s expectations, there was no promise where the word treasonous was used by a member putting a at that time to release confidential financial information of the question to a minister. At that time I asked the hon. member for band to him. The meeting was subsequently arranged for Septem- Burnaby—Douglas to withdraw his comments. At that time his ber 16, 1997. answer was no. A few days prior to the meeting Indian affairs officials learned I see that the hon. member for Burnaby—Douglas is in the that members of the Stony band would be attending with the hon. House this morning. Rather than have any kind of a long statement member. On the day of the meeting the departmental regional or explanation, as far as the House is concerned I have a question to office became aware that members of other bands in Alberta were put to the hon. member and it will be quite direct. also accompanying the member to the meeting. Does the hon. member wish to withdraw the word treasonous On September 16 the hon. member for Wild Rose arrived by bus which he refused to withdraw yesterday? for the meeting accompanied by two assistants and approximately 20 members from three different Alberta bands. The member Mr. Svend J. Robinson (Burnaby—Douglas, NDP): Mr. conducted at least one interview via telephone with the media Speaker, yes. Out of respect for the traditions of the House I do while on route to the meeting. withdraw the word treasonous. D (1005) The Speaker: I consider this matter closed. Representatives of the media also arrived at the building that * * * afternoon, apparently at the invitation of the hon. member. Despite this development the participants at the meeting were advised that PRIVILEGE they could be present for the general briefing but that DIAND officials were not at liberty to reveal to non-band members STONY RESERVE financial information confidential to the Stony band. The Speaker: The hon. member for Wild Rose raised a question The position taken by DIAND officials was guided by restric- of privilege on September 30. At that time I heard argument not tions of the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. only from the member but from other members in the House. This morning the hon. minister of Indian affairs will be making a It is acknowledged that the information sought was not requested statement, giving us further information on this question of privi- under the Access to Information Act. However, given the govern- lege. ment’s potential liability over inappropriate disclosure of confi- 368 COMMONS DEBATES October 2, 1997 Privilege dential information to third parties, the Access to Information Act entitled to the information he had sought as a representative of the is used for guidance on the informal release of information. individual band members present. The member’s assistant was advised by DIAND to submit a formal access to information request. This would allow the member to specifically state what Confidential financial information relative to the band is manda- information he required and it would enable the department to torily protected by the Access to Information Act. As such, it can obtain legal advice on a specific request for information. only be released to third parties after a consultation process. Consultations are with the chief and council or duly authorized officials of the band. Some of the information can be provided, These events appear to have led to the hon. member’s question of however, to individual members of the band, as they are entitled. privilege. I wish to submit the following points for consideration. At that point the largest contingent at the meeting, primarily First, the member for Wild Rose alleges that officials deliberate- members of the Samson band, agreed to leave the briefing and ly misled him and withheld information. The fact is there was no requested a separate meeting with DIAND officials immediately intention to deliberately mislead or withhold information. It was following the meeting with Stony band members. That request was my staff that offered the briefing and regional officials provided the granted. briefing as promised. The regional official involved did not provide information which he felt was confidential and protected under acts The hon. member for Wild Rose and one other member of of Parliament. another First Nation protested the position being taken by DIAND officials. An assistant to the hon. member then drafted a handwrit- Second, I do not believe that the official’s actions indicate a ten note at the meeting which he had signed by members of the contempt of this Parliament. The fact that he said he would not accompanying group. This note appointed the member as their release the requested information under unusual circumstances financial advisor. without first obtaining legal advice was, I believe, the prudent course of action and demonstrated no contempt for Parliament or The hon. member for Wild Rose claimed that as their financial the member’s rights as a parliamentarian. His emphasis on pru- advisor he was entitled to the same information as the band dence with respect to confidential information demonstrates his members themselves. DIAND officials were unsure of the legal respect for Parliament and the laws that it develops. implications of releasing the information under these circum- stances or the rights of a financial advisor to receive such informa- tion. As such, he advised those present that if they pursued the D (1010 ) matter legal advice would have to be sought before the meeting could continue. Third, in this question of privilege the hon. member refers to regulations governing disclosure of information. While it is not The hon. member agreed to leave the meeting to allow a clear to which regulations he is referring I wish to make the discussion of financial issues with the members of the Stony tribe. following points. The member for Wild Rose claims that the released confidential financial information is permitted if written The member for Wild Rose was not present during the discussion consent is received. The member argues that he had such consent. of financial issues which was provided to individual members of the Stony band, but he was present during the briefing by DIAND While it appears that he had the consent of a few band members, staff of the initiatives being taken to address the situation at Stony. the information being sought related to the entire band and was not These initiatives include the appointment of a third party manager specific to those members. He did not have the consent of the band. to manage the day to day operations of the Stony First Nation, the He also claims that as a member of Parliament he is entitled to initiation of a forensic audit of the band operations and the confidential information. If he is referring to the Privacy Act, establishment of a joint task force to examine the conditions on section 8.1(g) does allow that personal information can be released reserve and develop proposals to address them. to a member of Parliament ‘‘for the purpose of assisting the individual to whom the information relates in resolving a prob- After the meeting the hon. member asked if the department lem’’. Again, in this case the information requested was not could contribute to the cost of the bus which was used to bring the specific to the individuals but related to the entire band. group to the briefing. The member was advised at that point that this was not possible. My department arranged a briefing in good faith, provided the briefing and attempted to accommodate the request for information Sometime after the meeting the hon. member’s assistant con- within the law. The official involved acted prudently by not tacted the DIAND regional office. He stated that he had a conversa- revealing confidential information without seeking legal advice. I tion with an official in the office of the access to information am sure the hon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wednesday, March 23, 1994
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 043 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, March 23, 1994 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, March 23, 1994 The House met at 2 p.m. anglophone and francophone families in Quebec has narrowed from 8.2 per cent to 1.9 per cent. _______________ The income gap can be closed, Mr. Speaker, but one has to Prayers conclude that federal policies are not a contributing factor. _______________ * * * [English] STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS CREDIT RATING [English] Mr. Jim Gouk (Kootenay West—Revelstoke): Mr. Speaker, BIODIVERSITY yesterday after the announcement of the downgrading of Cana- da’s rating for foreign currency debt, the Minister of Finance Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport): Mr. Speaker, biodivers- stated it only affected a small portion of our total debt so it was ity means a richness of life as it surrounds us in nature. We must no big deal. preserve biodiversity because it is nature’s protection against catastrophes. The loss of biodiversity has serious implications Now the Bank of Canada has increased its key lending rate for life on earth. which undoubtedly will result in increased borrowing costs for Canadian consumers and businesses. It is also having an impact We have been told that since the beginning of the century 75 on the cost of government borrowing. per cent of crop diversity has been lost. This leaves us vulner- able. For example uniformity in corn crops could have resulted The budget did not address the deficit or debt. Now all in disaster when a severe blight threatened corn crops in the Canadians are starting to pay for this short–sightedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Brochure #Sendaiamericas #Resilienceforall #Beadrrchangeagent Table of Contents
    Fifth Regional Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas March 7 - 9, 2017 | Montreal, Canada | #SendaiAmericas Virtual Brochure #SendaiAmericas #ResilienceForAll #BeaDRRChangeAgent Table of Contents Welcome Messages by Dignitaries 2 Minister Ralph Goodale, Public Safety Canada 3 Mr. Robert Glasser, Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) for Disaster Risk Reduction 4 Minister Martin Coiteux, Public Safety Quebec and Responsible for Montreal Area 5 Mayor Denis Coderre, City of Montreal 6 Regional Platform Concept Note 9 Agenda/Program Sessions Concept Notes 13 Plenary 1 – Understanding the Risks in the Americas 15 Parallel 1 – Implementation and Measurement of the Sendai Framework and Linkage to Sustainable Development Goals 18 Parallel 2 – Innovations in Financial Resilience and Risk Financing 22 Parallel 3 – Building Resiliency: Indigenous Peoples and Disaster Risk Reduction 25 Plenary 2 – Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change and Sustainable Development 28 Parallel 4 – Empowerment of Women and Girls and Gender Equality in Disaster Risk Reduction 31 Parallel 5 – Intersections of Health Security and Disaster Risk Reduction 34 Parallel 6 – Sendai Framework Inclusion of Volunteers in Social Mobilization for Disaster Risk Reduction 37 Parallel 7 – Building Resilience in Cities 40 Parallel 8 – Engaging with the Private Sector to Understand and Reduce Risks 46 Parallel 9 – High Risk Populations as Agents of Change for Disaster Risk Reduction 48 Plenary 3 – Innovation for Disaster Risk Reduction Workshop – Sciences
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..170 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 137 Ï NUMBER 182 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 3, 2002 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 11161 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 3, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. We must, however, take care not to go to the opposite extreme and enact legislation with potential negative impact on the rights and freedoms of those we wish to protect, under the guise of fighting Prayers terrorism. We do not have to go far back in time to recall the late unlamented Bill C-42, so criticized for its negative effects on Ï (1010) fundamental rights and freedoms. [English] At the time, the government was busy boasting right and left of BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE what an ardent promoter of public security it was, rejecting the criticisms that were being made from this side of the House. Now The Deputy Speaker: It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order here we are again, starting off a new debate on a similar bill, 81 to inform the House that the motion to be considered Monday although a few changes have been made. during consideration of the business of supply is as follows: That, in the opinion of this House, the government should cease and desist its Why are we having this new debate? Simply because the public, sustained legislative and political attacks on the lives and livelihoods of rural Canadians and the communities where they live.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Imperialism and Exclusion in Canadian Parliamentary Talk About International Students Dale M
    Document generated on 09/30/2021 3:06 a.m. Canadian Journal of Higher Education Revue canadienne d'enseignement supérieur Border Imperialism and Exclusion in Canadian Parliamentary Talk about International Students Dale M. McCartney Special Issue: Emerging Issues in the Internationalization of Cdn. Article abstract Higher Ed. Although there is a rich critical literature examining international student Volume 50, Number 4, 2020 policy in Canada, very little of it considers the views of Members of Parliament. MPs have limited direct influence over international student policy, but their URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1075830ar policy talk about international students defines the context within which such DOI: https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v50i4.188831 policy is developed. For that reason Parliamentary debate deserves study. This paper examines MPs’ discussion of international students between 1984 and 2019, tracing themes in MP policy talk over the globalization era. It finds that See table of contents MPs evince remarkably consistent attitudes towards international students. Throughout the period MP policy talk shows that Parliamentarians saw international students as outsiders who were only ofvalue to the extent that Publisher(s) they could be made to serve Canada’s economic or political agenda. The uniformity of this attitude and the lack of dissenting voices suggest that MPs’ Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education views may be a significant barrier to reforming international student policy in Canada. ISSN 2293-6602 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article McCartney, D. (2020). Border Imperialism and Exclusion in Canadian Parliamentary Talk about International Students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education / Revue canadienne d'enseignement supérieur, 50(4), 37–51.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM::Advent3b2 8.25
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 39th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 39e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 1 No 1 Monday, April 3, 2006 Le lundi 3 avril 2006 11:00 a.m. 11 heures Today being the first day of the meeting of the First Session of Le Parlement se réunit aujourd'hui pour la première fois de la the 39th Parliament for the dispatch of business, Ms. Audrey première session de la 39e législature, pour l'expédition des O'Brien, Clerk of the House of Commons, Mr. Marc Bosc, Deputy affaires. Mme Audrey O'Brien, greffière de la Chambre des Clerk of the House of Commons, Mr. R. R. Walsh, Law Clerk and communes, M. Marc Bosc, sous-greffier de la Chambre des Parliamentary Counsel of the House of Commons, and Ms. Marie- communes, M. R. R. Walsh, légiste et conseiller parlementaire de Andrée Lajoie, Clerk Assistant of the House of Commons, la Chambre des communes, et Mme Marie-Andrée Lajoie, greffier Commissioners appointed per dedimus potestatem for the adjoint de la Chambre des communes, commissaires nommés en purpose of administering the oath to Members of the House of vertu d'une ordonnance, dedimus potestatem, pour faire prêter Commons, attending according to their duty, Ms. Audrey O'Brien serment aux députés de la Chambre des communes, sont présents laid upon the Table a list of the Members returned to serve in this dans l'exercice de leurs fonctions. Mme Audrey O'Brien dépose sur Parliament received by her as Clerk of the House of Commons le Bureau la liste des députés qui ont été proclamés élus au from and certified under the hand of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Economic Relationship Between
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA CROSSING THE ATLANTIC: EXPANDING THE ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CANADA AND EUROPE Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade Report of the Sub-Committee on International Trade, Trade Disputes and Investment Bill Graham, M.P. Chair Mac Harb, M.P. Chair of the Sub-Committee June 2001 The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part, for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Public Works and Government Services Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 CROSSING THE ATLANTIC: EXPANDING THE ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CANADA AND EUROPE Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade Report of the Sub-Committee on International Trade, Trade Disputes and Investment Bill Graham, M.P. Chair Mac Harb, M.P. Chair of the Sub-Committee June 2001 STANDING COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE CHAIR Bill Graham VICE-CHAIRS Colleen Beaumier Monte Solberg MEMBERS Jean Augustine Keith Martin Hon. George Baker Deepak Obhrai Bill Casey Pat O’Brien Rick Casson Pierre Paquette John Harvard Denis Paradis Stan Keyes Bernard Patry Francine Lalonde Svend Robinson Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Canadian Model of Proportional Representation by Robert S. Ring A
    Proportional-first-past-the-post: A Canadian model of Proportional Representation by Robert S. Ring A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Memorial University St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador May 2014 ii Abstract For more than a decade a majority of Canadians have consistently supported the idea of proportional representation when asked, yet all attempts at electoral reform thus far have failed. Even though a majority of Canadians support proportional representation, a majority also report they are satisfied with the current electoral system (even indicating support for both in the same survey). The author seeks to reconcile these potentially conflicting desires by designing a uniquely Canadian electoral system that keeps the positive and familiar features of first-past-the- post while creating a proportional election result. The author touches on the theory of representative democracy and its relationship with proportional representation before delving into the mechanics of electoral systems. He surveys some of the major electoral system proposals and options for Canada before finally presenting his made-in-Canada solution that he believes stands a better chance at gaining approval from Canadians than past proposals. iii Acknowledgements First of foremost, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to my brilliant supervisor, Dr. Amanda Bittner, whose continuous guidance, support, and advice over the past few years has been invaluable. I am especially grateful to you for encouraging me to pursue my Master’s and write about my electoral system idea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cord Weekly (November 7, 1991)
    AWILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY STUDENT PUBLICATION VOLUME XXXII, ISSUE 12 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1991 " P""ll-. IE--3I I~ Performer Stevie Starr showed off his regurgitating skill in Wilf's last Saturday. A very hardy crowd watched in awe as the hairy-chested man swallowed things -­ billiard balls, light bulbs, coins, butane, and as pictured here, live fish -­ and · then brought them up again. There's no story about this inside, what more is there to sayt We thought it might be nice .. to put it on the cover, though. Picture: Chris Skalkos. >1{-' •. ---.._.. ~~ --, .,:: -:p ., ~---- --=---=--~ ~-=- ---~.::--:--=--=--- - TJ>IUR.SD.A."Y". N<>"VE~ER.. 7. 1991 N 884-1360 STUDENTS' UNION Researcher Position 7 Opening Applications in STATION Students' Union Offices NOV. 12 IN THE UIDEO GAME I 0 AM- 8PM CX)\(XJJ{£ GIUEAWAY MAKE SIUDEl'IT ISSUES Deadline: ELECTION ISSU Tomorrow at 4:30p.m. November 17th . staying greot· .. It's not ettSY ils of styrofoam. ld from the ev ave the wor Help WLV _s & LVG 'a MVG, pus MESS KIT l.Jse your cAM rn ern be r to and re * RECYCLE *REUSE REDUCE GERRY WATSON "Ouw£!tt's PrcJIIier Billiard Entertainer" CANADIAN PRO (llt\MPION 8 ::, 9 IJt\LL A M , A 0 ' G K NOWS YOUR CHANCEl comln~ soon to the l.ill1f1E~@ I]f\[g -THE CONCOURSE @JR[ NOVEMBER 11th Keep your TICKETS GO ON SALE lfill©IfYJJ eyea peal NOV. 14 $7 IN ADVANCE 12:00 TO 2:00 PM $9 AT THE DOOR J'YL,&lYJEill CClliJ&IL.llJEJRI@IE for more MFfU:~li\lCVi TimiTCCIKS: ~lfliCWH'fS info I ir~ C[J 1))liv'JJ!E]])'Lf THUR.SDA."Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary | 2 Key Conclusions
    Overview Report Executive IN THE GTA Summary July 2017 Background The Black Experience Project began with a central question “What does it mean to be Black in the GTA?” From there, the study embarked on a journey of answering this question in an authentic and respectful way. Launched in 2010, the Black Experience Project (BEP) is a research study that examines the lived experiences of individuals who self-identify as Black and/or of African heritage living in the Greater Toronto Area, or GTA (the City of Toronto, and the Regions of York, Durham, Peel and Halton). This study was led by the Environics Institute for Survey Research, in partnership with the United Way of Toronto and York Region, the YMCA of the Greater Toronto Area, Ryerson’s Diversity Institute, and the Jean Augustine Chair in Education, Community and Diaspora at York University. This research aims to provide a better understanding of the lives of Black individuals within the GTA, including the factors leading to their successes and challenges. The results are intended to provide valuable insight and direction in identifying policies and other initiatives that will contribute to the health and vibrancy of the Black community, and by doing so, the health and vibrancy of the entire GTA and beyond. Project results are expected to provide a focal point for the Black community to better harness its assets and expand its successes throughout the entire community. These results will also help the broader community (e.g., community leaders, decision- makers, policy makers, general public) understand and appreciate the diversity and vibrancy of the Black community within their vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • BAD MEDICINE: Trade Treaties, Privatization and Health Care Reform in Canada 3 Contents
    TradeTrade treaties,treaties, privatization privatization andand healthhealth carecare reformreform inin CanadaCanada Jim Grieshaber-Otto and Scott Sinclair Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Trade treaties, privatization and health care reform in Canada Jim Grieshaber-Otto and Scott Sinclair 2004 2 CANADIAN CENTRE FOR POLICY ALTERNATIVES Copyright © 2004 Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and the authors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or the author. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Grieshaber-Otto, Jim Bad medicine : trade treaties, privatization and health care reform in Canada / Jim Grieshaber-Otto and Scott Sinclair. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-88627-402-8 1. Health care reform—Canada. 2. Canada—Commercial treaties— Social aspects. 3. Medical policy—Canada. 4. Privatization—Canada. 5. Health planning—Canada. I. Sinclair, Scott II. Title. RA412.5.C3G75 2004 362.1’0971 C2004-903350-6 cover design by Studio 2 ([email protected]) text layout & design by Dirk Van Stralen Printed and bound in Canada Published by Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Suite 410, 75 Albert Street Ottawa, ON K1P 5E7 Tel 613-563-1341 Fax 613-233-1458 http://www.policyalternatives.ca [email protected] CAW 567 OTTAWA BAD MEDICINE: Trade treaties, privatization and health care reform
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..186 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 060 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 18, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 3683 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 18, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. (a) the motion shall again be considered on a day designated by the Government after consultation with the House Leaders of the other parties, but in any case not later than the tenth sitting day after the interruption; Prayers (b) debate on the motion shall be resumed at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment on the day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section and shall not be further interrupted or adjourned; and (c) when no Member rises to speak or after three hours of debate, whichever is GOVERNMENT ORDERS earlier, the Speaker shall put all questions necessary to dispose of the motion, provided that, if a recorded division is requested on the motion considered on a (1000) Ï day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this Standing Order, it shall stand [English] deferred to an appointed time on the next Wednesday, no later than the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on that day. STANDING ORDERS (3) Not more than one motion for the concurrence in a report from a standing or Hon. Anne McLellan (for the Leader of the Government in the special committee may be moved on any sitting day.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Canada Consider Proportional Representation?" March 15, 2002
    Fourth Annual Mel Smith Lecture Trinity Western University "Should Canada Consider Proportional Representation?" March 15, 2002 Nick Loenen Contents Lack of an Alternative Government 6 Objections Considered 11 Excessive Concentration of Political Power 17 Political Disengagement 21 Mel Smith’s Contribution 26 End Notes 31 1 The invitation to give the fourth annual Mel Smith Lecture is a singular honour of which I am deeply appreciative. Mel Smith was imaginative and gifted. When Mel Smith spoke he spoke with authority, because he was an authority. He was devoted to a strong West within a strong Canada. To him, it is fair regional representation at the centre that makes Canada strong, it is also what he considered to be most lacking. He promoted reform through constitutional means. I seek reform through parliamentary and particularly electoral means. Our journeys are complimentary, two means to the same end, our paths crossed, and I gained a colleague and friend. His friendship enriched my life to this day. Mel Smith, as befits his legal profession, was careful to stipulate the purpose of this annual lecture. It is to focus, in his words, “on a national issue from a decidedly Western perspective.” This then is my assignment. I have selected three current, national trends that bode ill for our body politic if left unattended. This paper suggests that a switch to proportional representation can reverse those trends. The trends are: y Lack of an alternative government. y Excessive concentration of power in the PMO. y Growing political disengagement. In closing, the paper suggests that proportional representation might also attain some of the goals Mel Smith advanced throughout his professional life; in particular it shows how changing our voting system relates to Mel's many proposals to effect a more meaningful role for the West within confederation.
    [Show full text]