DOCSLIB.ORG

Post Wildfire Indigenous Heritage Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Post Wildfire Indigenous Heritage Survey Perspectives Heritage Solutions Pty Ltd Joanna Freslov, Phillip Hughes, Russell Mullett December 2004 AAV Project No. 2833 Post Wildfire Indigenous Heritage Survey Volume 1: Background, Survey, Results and Recommended Management Options A Report to Parks Victoria, the Department of Sustainability and Environment, and Aboriginal Affairs Victoria POST WILDFIRE INDIGENOUS SURVEY Perspectives Heritage Solutions Pty Ltd PO Box 713 • Hurstbridge VIC 3099 Phone (03) 9718 1554 • Fax (03) 9718 1829 Cover plate: View from Mount Sarah Track (view northeast) ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary During 2003 a large bushfire burnt over 1.2 million hectares of private and public land in the high country of northeast Victoria and Gippsland. The fire and suppression activities affected a range of values in the highlands including Aboriginal heritage values. The Public Land Ecological and Cultural Bushfire Recovery Program determined that the best way to address and enhance effective cultural heritage management was an increased understanding of the nature and extent of the impact of bushfires on Indigenous heritage values. The Public Land Ecological and Cultural Bushfire Recovery Program aimed to collect this information through a project which would investigate and assess the impact of the bushfire and fire suppression activities on Indigenous cultural heritage values on public land. This project would also include an assessment of the impact of the bushfire on non-material heritage values including spiritual places and historic attachments. The project would be managed jointly by Parks Victoria (PV) and the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE). Parks Victoria and the Department of Sustainability and Environment therefore commissioned Perspectives Heritage Solutions Pty Ltd to conduct an archaeological survey for Aboriginal cultural heritage values within 12 study areas (later expanded to 14 areas) in the highlands and alpine regions of northeast Victoria and Gippsland (see Figure 1). The project required close consultation with, and participation of local Indigenous communities and traditional owners. The assessment has therefore comprised a background study of known archaeological values, modelling to produce a set of sensitivity zoning statements about site patterning in the selected study areas, interviews with traditional owners, a review of archival documentary archival sources to produce an ethnohistory, an archaeological survey for cultural sites, an assessment of the impact of the fires and fire suppression activities on Aboriginal cultural values in the study areas, training and mentoring of Aboriginal field teams and a report detailing the results of the study and survey, the risks posed to the Aboriginal heritage values and management issues and recommended management options for the future protection of Aboriginal heritage values in the project area. The report has been divided into four volumes: Volume 1—a study presenting a review of the known archaeology of the project area, sensitivity zoning statements, results of the survey and specific management recommendations for cultural heritage sites; Volume 2—a review of the impact of the fire and fire suppression activities on Aboriginal cultural heritage values and general principles for addressing the impact issues; Volume 3—an account of the consultation process, the ethnohistory, oral history, interviews with traditional owners, a plain language summary of the results of the survey and training; and Volume 4—all survey data, specific site location information and maps showing site locations and archaeologically sensitive areas. This volume, Volume 1, presents the background review and results of the survey. The study area consisted of 14 study units of varying size ranging between 70 km2 (Mount Mittamatite) to 3160 km2 (the expanded Dargo area) within a complex range of alpine/sub-alpine and footslope environments. A survey for Aboriginal archaeological values was conducted in the study areas between late January and April 2004 with several survey teams made up of two archaeologists, and up to six Indigenous staff. The survey targeted areas of interest within the fire affected areas and a total of 434 hectares was surveyed representing about 0.1% of the project area. The survey teams recorded 325 Aboriginal and non- Aboriginal archaeological sites. All sites were fully recorded and placed on the Aboriginal Affairs Victoria Site Register and the Heritage Victoria Inventory. An analysis of the site location, density and contents iii POST WILDFIRE INDIGENOUS SURVEY suggest that the region was heavily exploited and this is consistent with oral sources suggesting that the area was a rich resource zone. An assessment of the impact of the fires and fire suppression activities was carried out during the survey. The sensitivity zoning statements were also tested and refined during the survey and, based on the background research and the results of the fieldwork, the assessment of impacts to cultural heritage values and the sensitivity zoning statements, the study has identified areas of sensitivity for potential Aboriginal archaeological remains and has made a series of recommended management options to mitigate impact on the known sites and any potential but as yet unknown sites. These are summarised in the table below. A series of principles for the management of impact to heritage values during wildfire preparedness, suppression and recovery are presented in Volume 2. Consultation was undertaken with all the relevant Aboriginal representatives and representative groups by the project managers and in the field by the archaeologist. Consultation was conducted with the Gippsland Regional Cultural Heritage Program, the North East regional Cultural Heritage Program, the Gippsland East Gippsland Aboriginal Cooperative, Bangerang Cultural Centre, Mungabareena Aboriginal Corporation, Moogji Aboriginal Council, the Gunai Kurnai, Yeerung Kurnai, Monaro People, the Bidawal People, the Dhuduroa People, Waveroo People, and the Taunaurong Clans. Their views, where appropriate, are incorporated in the recommended management options (see Volume 3).1 1 Archaeological reports may be independently reviewed by Aboriginal Affairs Victoria, and the relevant Aboriginal community. Although the findings of a consultant’s report will be taken into consideration, recommendations in relation to managing heritage places should not be taken to imply automatic approval of those actions by Aboriginal Affairs Victoria, or the Aboriginal community. iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MANAGEMENT IMPACT SENSITIVITY PREDICTED REC. RECOMMENDATION/MANAGEMENT OPTION ZONE SITES NO. All areas All surface Various Artefact R. 1 General recommendation for all ground disturbing works across all land management tenures works in the scatters, Aboriginal Sites management isolated Follow PV and DSE cultural heritage guidelines during planning for ground disturbing works (Cultural areas artefacts, Heritage Planning Phase). scarred trees, The management recommendations in this report should be consulted during this planning phase to assist this quarries, process. hearths, grind Where works are likely to impact upon cultural heritage values, consultation with both traditional owners and stones, the relevant Aboriginal community will be required and a Consent to Disturb permit sought from the relevant grinding Aboriginal community under the terms of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island Heritage Protection Act grooves, stone 1984 before any works can proceed (see Appendix 3). arrangements, Follow PV and DSE cultural heritage guidelines during the works (Project Implementation and Delivery). rock shelters Some larger and more important sites may require individual heritage management plans (see below). See Volume All areas and areas of potential archaeological deposits (PADs) 4, sensitive Where works are carried out in areas where there are no known sites or in areas of potential archaeological archaeological deposits (PADs), PV and DSE heritage guidelines should be followed. The following should be noted: zones Consult with the relevant Aboriginal representatives and the agency Indigenous coordinator prior to conducting works in these areas. An archaeological survey or sub-surface testing may be required in PADS prior to works commencing. Monitoring of works by relevant Aboriginal representatives may be required of PADs during works. In all areas, including PADs, works staff should be alert and observe for Aboriginal materials during all ground disturbing activities. If located, stop all works in the vicinity immediately that it is safe to do so. Note the location of any finds. Report any finds or disturbance to the Works Supervisor who should then inform the appropriate people, including the relevant Indigenous agency representative, relevant Aboriginal representative and AAV. Works in this location cannot proceed without a Consent to Disturb permit. A qualified archaeologist and the relevant Aboriginal representatives should then attend the site promptly to fully record the site, place the site on the AAV Sites Register and determine appropriate management through consultation. The archaeologist can assist the agency to obtain a ‘Consent to Disturb’ permit following the above procedures. Human remains If human remains are located follow the procedure outlined in Appendix 5. It is important that this protocol be adhered to completely. v POST WILDFIRE INDIGENOUS SURVEY MANAGEMENT IMPACT SENSITIVITY PREDICTED REC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Galaxias Sp. 6), Affected by the White Timber Spur Fire, Upper Dargo River System
    Assessment of the post-fire status and distribution of the Dargo Galaxias (Galaxias sp. 6), affected by the White Timber Spur fire, upper Dargo River system Black Saturday Victoria 2009 – Natural values fire recovery program Tarmo Raadik and Michael Nicol Assessment of the post-fire status and distribution of the Dargo Galaxias (Galaxias sp. 6), affected by the White Timber Spur fire, upper Dargo River system. Tarmo Raadik and Michael Nicol Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability and Environment 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 This project is No. 15 of the program ‘Rebuilding Together’ funded by the Victorian and Commonwealth governments’ Statewide Bushfire Recovery Plan, launched October 2009. Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, February 2012 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2012 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any person except in accordance with the provision of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson St, East Melbourne. Print managed by Finsbury Green Printed on recycled paper ISBN 978-1-74287-442-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-74287-443-2 (online) For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186. Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauging Station Index
    Site Details Flow/Volume Height/Elevation NSW River Basins: Gauging Station Details Other No. of Area Data Data Site ID Sitename Cat Commence Ceased Status Owner Lat Long Datum Start Date End Date Start Date End Date Data Gaugings (km2) (Years) (Years) 1102001 Homestead Creek at Fowlers Gap C 7/08/1972 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 19.9 -31.0848 141.6974 GDA94 07/08/1972 16/12/1995 23.4 01/01/1972 01/01/1996 24 Rn 1102002 Frieslich Creek at Frieslich Dam C 21/10/1976 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 8 -31.0660 141.6690 GDA94 19/03/1977 31/05/2003 26.2 01/01/1977 01/01/2004 27 Rn 1102003 Fowlers Creek at Fowlers Gap C 13/05/1980 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 384 -31.0856 141.7131 GDA94 28/02/1992 07/12/1992 0.8 01/05/1980 01/01/1993 12.7 Basin 201: Tweed River Basin 201001 Oxley River at Eungella A 21/05/1947 Open DWR 213 -28.3537 153.2931 GDA94 03/03/1957 08/11/2010 53.7 30/12/1899 08/11/2010 110.9 Rn 388 201002 Rous River at Boat Harbour No.1 C 27/05/1947 31/07/1957 Closed DWR 124 -28.3151 153.3511 GDA94 01/05/1947 01/04/1957 9.9 48 201003 Tweed River at Braeside C 20/08/1951 31/12/1968 Closed DWR 298 -28.3960 153.3369 GDA94 01/08/1951 01/01/1969 17.4 126 201004 Tweed River at Kunghur C 14/05/1954 2/06/1982 Closed DWR 49 -28.4702 153.2547 GDA94 01/08/1954 01/07/1982 27.9 196 201005 Rous River at Boat Harbour No.3 A 3/04/1957 Open DWR 111 -28.3096 153.3360 GDA94 03/04/1957 08/11/2010 53.6 01/01/1957 01/01/2010 53 261 201006 Oxley River at Tyalgum C 5/05/1969 12/08/1982 Closed DWR 153 -28.3526 153.2245 GDA94 01/06/1969 01/09/1982 13.3 108 201007 Hopping Dick Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Goulburn River Catchment Local Management Rules
    UPPER GOULBURN RIVER CATCHMENT LOCAL MANAGEMENT RULES 1. Catchment Information 3. Compliance Point The Goulburn River flows into Lake Eildon near the There is a surface water monitoring station located township of Jamieson and encompasses an area of upstream of Jamieson on the Mansfield-Woods Point approximately 750 km2. The mean annual flow at the Road. The site is called the Goulburn River @ Dohertys. bottom of the Upper Goulburn River catchment is approximately 357,000 ML/yr, which flows into the 4. Licences headwaters of Eildon. The Goulburn Broken Regional Licence Allocation in the Upper Goulburn River and River Health Strategy lists the Goulburn River above Tributaries Eildon as a high value asset as it is classed as an Licence Type Number of Volume (ML) ecologically healthy river containing Macquarie Perch, Licences Barred Galaxias, and the Spotted Tree Frog. Irrigation 59 130 Total 59 130 The catchment is bound to the west by the Big River catchment, the east by the Macalister River and the 5. Additional Information north by the Jamieson River catchment. Significant Stream codes and sustainable diversion limit zones are tributaries of the upper Goulburn include the Snake, provided within this document for identification Webber, Gaffneys, Moonlight, Edwards and Pheasant purposes when discussing the catchment diversion Creeks and the Black River. The main townships in the management with Goulburn-Murray Water Officers. catchment include Kevington, Knockwood, and Woods Point. The catchment is predominantly a forested Stream Codes catchment with small pockets of cleared land around Stream codes used in the management of the Upper the townships within the valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowy River Basin January 2014
    Snowy River Basin January 2014 Introduction Southern Rural Water is the water corporation responsible for administering and enforcing the Snowy River Basin Local Management Plan. The purpose of the Snowy River Basin Local Management Plan is to: • document the management objectives for the system • explain to licence holders (and the broader community) the specific management objectives and arrangements for their water resource and the rules that apply to them as users of that resource; • clarify water sharing arrangements for all users and the environment, including environmental flow requirements • document any limits, including water use caps, permissible consumptive volumes or extraction limits that apply to the system. Management objectives The objective of the Local Management Plan is to ensure the equitable sharing of water between users and the environment and the long-term sustainability of the resource. Water system covered The Local Management Plan covers all the rivers and creeks located within the Snowy River Basin, which includes: • Snowy River • Major Creek • Brodribb River • Buchan River • Deddick River • Cabbage Tree Creek • Hospital Creek The Snowy River Basin is shown in the map below. Catchment information The Snowy River flows across the NSW border to the coast at Marlo. Significant tributaries of the Snowy River include Buchan, Murrindal, Suggan Buggan, Deddick and Brodribb Rivers. The Snowy floodplain contains a complex system of drains and levee banks to support agricultural production. Heritage River status applies to the entire Victorian length of the Snowy River. The Snowy has many significant attributes including canoeing and rafting opportunities, scenic landscapes, cultural Indigenous heritage sites and native fish and fauna habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria
    Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria R.C. DeRose, I.P.Prosser, L.J. Wilkinson, A.O. Hughes and W.J. Young CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra Technical Report 11/03, March 2003 CSIRO LAND and WATER Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria R.C. DeRose, I.P. Prosser, L.J. Wilkinson, A.O. Hughes and W.J. Young CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra Technical Report 11/03, March 2003 Copyright ©2003 CSIRO Land and Water To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO Land and Water. Important Disclaimer To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO Land and Water (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. ISSN 1446-6163 Table of Contents Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Candidates Metropolitan
    YOUR CANDIDATES METROPOLITAN First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria Election 2019 “TREATY TO ME IS A RECOGNITION THAT WE ARE THE FIRST INHABITANTS OF THIS COUNTRY AND THAT OUR VOICE BE HEARD AND RESPECTED” Uncle Archie Roach VOTING IS OPEN FROM 16 SEPTEMBER – 20 OCTOBER 2019 Treaties are our self-determining right. They can give us justice for the past and hope for the future. The First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria will be our voice as we work towards Treaties. The First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria will be set up this year, with its first meeting set to be held in December. The Assembly will be a powerful, independent and culturally strong organisation made up of 32 Victorian Traditional Owners. If you’re a Victorian Traditional Owner or an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander person living in Victoria, you’re eligible to vote for your Assembly representatives through a historic election process. Your voice matters, your vote is crucial. HAVE YOU ENROLLED TO VOTE? To be able to vote, you’ll need to make sure you’re enrolled. This will only take you a few minutes. You can do this at the same time as voting, or before you vote. The Assembly election is completely Aboriginal owned and independent from any Government election (this includes the Victorian Electoral Commission and the Australian Electoral Commission). This means, even if you vote every year in other elections, you’ll still need to sign up to vote for your Assembly representatives. Don’t worry, your details will never be shared with Government, or any electoral commissions and you won’t get fined if you decide not to vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Tatz MIC Castan Essay Dec 2011
    Indigenous Human Rights and History: occasional papers Series Editors: Lynette Russell, Melissa Castan The editors welcome written submissions writing on issues of Indigenous human rights and history. Please send enquiries including an abstract to arts- [email protected]. ISBN 978-0-9872391-0-5 Genocide in Australia: By Accident or Design? Colin Tatz © Indigenous Human Rights and History Vol 1(1). The essays in this series are fully refereed. Editorial committee: John Bradley, Melissa Castan, Stephen Gray, Zane Ma Rhea and Lynette Russell. Genocide in Australia: By Accident or Design? Colin Tatz © Colin Tatz 1 CONTENTS Editor’s Acknowledgements …… 3 Editor’s introduction …… 4 The Context …… 11 Australia and the Genocide Convention …… 12 Perceptions of the Victims …… 18 Killing Members of the Group …… 22 Protection by Segregation …… 29 Forcible Child Removals — the Stolen Generations …… 36 The Politics of Amnesia — Denialism …… 44 The Politics of Apology — Admissions, Regrets and Law Suits …… 53 Eyewitness Accounts — the Killings …… 58 Eyewitness Accounts — the Child Removals …… 68 Moving On, Moving From …… 76 References …… 84 Appendix — Some Known Massacre Sites and Dates …… 100 2 Acknowledgements The Editors would like to thank Dr Stephen Gray, Associate Professor John Bradley and Dr Zane Ma Rhea for their feedback on earlier versions of this essay. Myles Russell-Cook created the design layout and desk-top publishing. Financial assistance was generously provided by the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law and the School of Journalism, Australian and Indigenous Studies. 3 Editor’s introduction This essay is the first in a new series of scholarly discussion papers published jointly by the Monash Indigenous Centre and the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Supply Area–Extractive Industry Interest Areas Review
    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review Geological Survey of Victoria Technical Record 2003/2 A. Olshina & P. Burn Bibliographic reference: Olshina, A. & Burn, P., 2003. Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review. Geological Survey of Victoria. Technical Record 2003/2. Geological Survey of Victoria. Ó Crown (State of Victoria) Copyright 2003 Geological Survey of Victoria ISSN 1324 0307 ISBN 1 74106 838 X Keywords: extractive industry, quarry, planning, Melbourne, Victoria, stone resources, sand resources This report may be purchased from: The authors would like to thank Gayle Ellis for Business Centre, proofreading and typesetting this report. Department of Primary Industries Eighth Floor, 240 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, 3002 Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the Or accessed at: State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/ that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and For further technical information contact: therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or Manager, other consequences which may arise from you relying Geological Survey of Victoria, on any information in this publication. P O Box 500 East Melbourne 3002. Acknowledgments: Many of the original concepts and planning policies used in this report were developed by Barbara Guerin and the Environment and Natural Resources Committee (ENRC) and by Frank Jiricek, formerly of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment. The following MPD staff contributed to this document: Ben White provided significant assistance to the consultation process for this report. Roger Buckley and Linda Bibby provided valuable input to the contents of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Traditional Owner Groups For
    A Guide to Traditional Owner Groups Th is m ap w as e nd orse d by th e Murray Low e r Darling Rive rs Ind ige nous Nations (MLDRIN) for Water Resource Plan Areas - re pre se ntative organisation on 20 August 2018 Groundwater and th e North e rn Basin Aboriginal Nations (NBAN) re pre se ntative organisation on 23 Octobe r 2018 Bidjara Barunggam Gunggari/Kungarri Budjiti Bidjara Guwamu (Kooma) Guwamu (Kooma) Bigambul Jarowair Gunggari/Kungarri Euahlayi Kambuwal Kunja Gomeroi/Kamilaroi Mandandanji Mandandanji Murrawarri Giabel Bigambul Mardigan Githabul Wakka Wakka Murrawarri Githabul Guwamu (Kooma) M Gomeroi/Kamilaroi a r a Kambuwal !(Charleville n o Ro!(ma Mandandanji a GW21 R i «¬ v Barkandji Mutthi Mutthi GW22 e ne R r i i «¬ am ver Barapa Barapa Nari Nari d on Bigambul Ngarabal C BRISBANE Budjiti Ngemba k r e Toowoomba )" e !( Euahlayi Ngiyampaa e v r er i ie Riv C oon Githabul Nyeri Nyeri R M e o r Gomeroi/Kamilaroi Tati Tati n o e i St George r !( v b GW19 i Guwamu (Kooma) Wadi Wadi a e P R «¬ Kambuwal Wailwan N o Wemba Wemba g Kunja e r r e !( Kwiambul Weki Weki r iv Goondiwindi a R Barkandji Kunja e GW18 Maljangapa Wiradjuri W n r on ¬ Bigambul e « Kwiambul l Maraura Yita Yita v a r i B ve Budjiti Maljangapa R i Murrawarri Yorta Yorta a R Euahlayi o n M Murrawarri g a a l rr GW15 c Bigambul Gomeroi/Kamilaroi Ngarabal u a int C N «¬!( yre Githabul R Guwamu (Kooma) Ngemba iv er Kambuwal Kambuwal Wailwan N MoreeG am w Gomeroi/Kamilaroi Wiradjuri o yd Barwon River i R ir R Kwiambul !(Bourke iv iv Barkandji e er GW13 C r GW14 Budjiti
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitation Guidelines for the Resort Areas of Kosciuszko National Park
    Rehabilitation Guidelines for the Resort Areas of Kosciuszko National Park August 2007 Rehabilitation Guidelines for the Resort Areas of Kosciuszko National Park Prepared for: Parks and Wildlife Division Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW PO Box 2228 Jindabyne NSW 2627 Australia By: nghenvironmental PO Box 4770 Bega NSW 2550 Australia Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59-61 Goulburn St PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Australia Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTy: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] DECC 2007/596 ISBN 978 1 74232 037 3 First Edition published August 2007 Front cover photographs courtesy of Kosciuszko Thredbo Pty Ltd, Perisher Blue Pty Ltd and Mount Selwyn Snowfields Pty Ltd. Acknowledgements This document has been created in collaboration with Marnie Stewart DEC, Liz MacPhee DEC and a steering committee representing the NSW alpine resorts including Kosciuszko Thredbo, Perisher Blue, Charlotte Pass and Mount Selwyn. It was prepared by nghenvironmental. Liz MacPhee (NPWS Rehabilitation Officer, Former Snowy Sites Scheme) provided significant information in regard to the planning of rehabilitation and relevant rehabilitation techniques that have been researched and applied in Victorian alpine resorts. This information in this document is the intellectual property of the Department of Environment and Conservation and is protected under copyright laws. Amendments and Additions The only controlled copy of the Rehabilitation Guidelines will be the version available at www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au Amendments are to be recorded in the table below.
    [Show full text]
  • Sendle Zones
    Suburb Suburb Postcode State Zone Cowan 2081 NSW Cowan 2081 NSW Remote Berowra Creek 2082 NSW Berowra Creek 2082 NSW Remote Bar Point 2083 NSW Bar Point 2083 NSW Remote Cheero Point 2083 NSW Cheero Point 2083 NSW Remote Cogra Bay 2083 NSW Cogra Bay 2083 NSW Remote Milsons Passage 2083 NSW Milsons Passage 2083 NSW Remote Cottage Point 2084 NSW Cottage Point 2084 NSW Remote Mccarrs Creek 2105 NSW Mccarrs Creek 2105 NSW Remote Elvina Bay 2105 NSW Elvina Bay 2105 NSW Remote Lovett Bay 2105 NSW Lovett Bay 2105 NSW Remote Morning Bay 2105 NSW Morning Bay 2105 NSW Remote Scotland Island 2105 NSW Scotland Island 2105 NSW Remote Coasters Retreat 2108 NSW Coasters Retreat 2108 NSW Remote Currawong Beach 2108 NSW Currawong Beach 2108 NSW Remote Canoelands 2157 NSW Canoelands 2157 NSW Remote Forest Glen 2157 NSW Forest Glen 2157 NSW Remote Fiddletown 2159 NSW Fiddletown 2159 NSW Remote Bundeena 2230 NSW Bundeena 2230 NSW Remote Maianbar 2230 NSW Maianbar 2230 NSW Remote Audley 2232 NSW Audley 2232 NSW Remote Greengrove 2250 NSW Greengrove 2250 NSW Remote Mooney Mooney Creek 2250 NSWMooney Mooney Creek 2250 NSW Remote Ten Mile Hollow 2250 NSW Ten Mile Hollow 2250 NSW Remote Frazer Park 2259 NSW Frazer Park 2259 NSW Remote Martinsville 2265 NSW Martinsville 2265 NSW Remote Dangar 2309 NSW Dangar 2309 NSW Remote Allynbrook 2311 NSW Allynbrook 2311 NSW Remote Bingleburra 2311 NSW Bingleburra 2311 NSW Remote Carrabolla 2311 NSW Carrabolla 2311 NSW Remote East Gresford 2311 NSW East Gresford 2311 NSW Remote Eccleston 2311 NSW Eccleston 2311 NSW Remote
    [Show full text]