First Record of the Sequestrate Fungus <I>Neosecotium Macrosporum</I> (<I>Agaricales</I>, <I>Lepio
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MYCOTAXON Volume 96, Pp
MYCOTAXON Volume 96, pp. 181–191 April–June 2006 The genus Chlorophyllum (Basidiomycetes) in China Z. W. GE1, 2 & Zhu L. YANG1, * [email protected] [email protected] 1 Laboratory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Kunming Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences, Heilongtan, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, P. R. China 2 Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100039, P. R. China Abstract—Species of the genus Chlorophyllum (Agaricaceae) in China are described and illustrated with line drawings. Among them, C. sphaerosporum is new to science, and C. hortense is new to China. A key to the Chlorophyllum species in China is also provided. Key words—Agaricales, new taxon, new record, taxonomy, distribution Introduction The genus Chlorophyllum Massee (Agaricaceae, Agaricales, Basidiomycetes) in its amended sense is characterized by a hymenidermal pileus covering, a smooth stipe, and basidiospores without a germ pore or with a germ pore but just caused by a depression in the episporium. A hyaline covering on the germ pore is absent. The basidiospores may be white, green, brownish or brown in deposit, and the habit varies from agaricoid to secotioid (Vellinga 2001, 2002, 2003a, b; Vellinga & de Kok 2002; Vellinga et al. 2003). During our survey of the lepiotoid fungi in China, several species were identified, and one new species of the genus was encountered and thus described below. Differences between similar species are provided and discussed. Material and methods All material examined collected in China, and deposited in three Herbaria. Herbarium codes used follow Holmgren et al. (1990) with one exception: HKAS = Herbarium of Cryptogams, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, which is not listed in the index or relevant publications. -
A Preliminary Checklist of Arizona Macrofungi
A PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF ARIZONA MACROFUNGI Scott T. Bates School of Life Sciences Arizona State University PO Box 874601 Tempe, AZ 85287-4601 ABSTRACT A checklist of 1290 species of nonlichenized ascomycetaceous, basidiomycetaceous, and zygomycetaceous macrofungi is presented for the state of Arizona. The checklist was compiled from records of Arizona fungi in scientific publications or herbarium databases. Additional records were obtained from a physical search of herbarium specimens in the University of Arizona’s Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium and of the author’s personal herbarium. This publication represents the first comprehensive checklist of macrofungi for Arizona. In all probability, the checklist is far from complete as new species await discovery and some of the species listed are in need of taxonomic revision. The data presented here serve as a baseline for future studies related to fungal biodiversity in Arizona and can contribute to state or national inventories of biota. INTRODUCTION Arizona is a state noted for the diversity of its biotic communities (Brown 1994). Boreal forests found at high altitudes, the ‘Sky Islands’ prevalent in the southern parts of the state, and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa P.& C. Lawson) forests that are widespread in Arizona, all provide rich habitats that sustain numerous species of macrofungi. Even xeric biomes, such as desertscrub and semidesert- grasslands, support a unique mycota, which include rare species such as Itajahya galericulata A. Møller (Long & Stouffer 1943b, Fig. 2c). Although checklists for some groups of fungi present in the state have been published previously (e.g., Gilbertson & Budington 1970, Gilbertson et al. 1974, Gilbertson & Bigelow 1998, Fogel & States 2002), this checklist represents the first comprehensive listing of all macrofungi in the kingdom Eumycota (Fungi) that are known from Arizona. -
2 the Numbers Behind Mushroom Biodiversity
15 2 The Numbers Behind Mushroom Biodiversity Anabela Martins Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, School of Agriculture (IPB-ESA), Portugal 2.1 Origin and Diversity of Fungi Fungi are difficult to preserve and fossilize and due to the poor preservation of most fungal structures, it has been difficult to interpret the fossil record of fungi. Hyphae, the vegetative bodies of fungi, bear few distinctive morphological characteristicss, and organisms as diverse as cyanobacteria, eukaryotic algal groups, and oomycetes can easily be mistaken for them (Taylor & Taylor 1993). Fossils provide minimum ages for divergences and genetic lineages can be much older than even the oldest fossil representative found. According to Berbee and Taylor (2010), molecular clocks (conversion of molecular changes into geological time) calibrated by fossils are the only available tools to estimate timing of evolutionary events in fossil‐poor groups, such as fungi. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiotic fungi from the division Glomeromycota, gen- erally accepted as the phylogenetic sister clade to the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, have left the most ancient fossils in the Rhynie Chert of Aberdeenshire in the north of Scotland (400 million years old). The Glomeromycota and several other fungi have been found associated with the preserved tissues of early vascular plants (Taylor et al. 2004a). Fossil spores from these shallow marine sediments from the Ordovician that closely resemble Glomeromycota spores and finely branched hyphae arbuscules within plant cells were clearly preserved in cells of stems of a 400 Ma primitive land plant, Aglaophyton, from Rhynie chert 455–460 Ma in age (Redecker et al. 2000; Remy et al. 1994) and from roots from the Triassic (250–199 Ma) (Berbee & Taylor 2010; Stubblefield et al. -
Arizona Gasteroid Fungi I: Lycoperdaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota)
Fungal Diversity Arizona gasteroid fungi I: Lycoperdaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) Bates, S.T.1*, Roberson, R.W.1 and Desjardin, D.E.2 1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA 2Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco, California 94132, USA Bates, S.T., Roberson, R.W. and Desjardin, D.E. (2009). Arizona gasteroid fungi I: Lycoperdaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota). Fungal Diversity 37: 153-207. Twenty-eight species in the family Lycoperdaceae, commonly called ‘puffballs’, are reported from Arizona, USA. In addition to widely distributed species, understudied species (e.g., Calvatia cf. leiospora and Holocotylon brandegeeanum) are treated. Taxonomic descriptions and illustrations, which include microscopic characters, are given for each species, and a dichotomous key is presented to facilitate identification. Basidiospore morphology was also examined ultrastructurally using scanning electron microscopy, and phylogenetic analyses were carried out on nrRNA gene sequences (ITS1, ITS2, and 5.8S) from 42 species within (or closely allied to) the Lycoperdaceae. Key words: Agaricales, euagarics, fungal taxonomy, gasteroid fungi, gasteromycete, Lycoperdaceae, puffballs. Article Information Received 22 August 2008 Accepted 25 November 2008 Published online 1 August 2009 *Corresponding author: Scott T. Bates; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction Agaricales, Boletales, and Russulales. Accordingly, a vigorous debate concerning the Lycoperdaceae Chevall. -
Fungi from the Owyhee Region
FUNGI FROM THE OWYHEE REGION OF SOUTHERN IDAHO AND EASTERN OREGON bY Marcia C. Wicklow-Howard and Julie Kaltenecker Boise State University Boise, Idaho Prepared for: Eastside Ecosystem Management Project October 1994 THE OWYHEE REGION The Owyhee Region is south of the Snake River and covers Owyhee County, Idaho, Malheur County, Oregon, and a part of northern Nevada. It extends approximately from 115” to 118” West longitude and is bounded by parallels 41” to 44”. Owyhee County includes 7,662 square miles, Malheur County has 9,861 square miles, and the part of northern Nevada which is in the Owyhee River watershed is about 2,900 square miles. The elevations in the region range from about 660 m in the Snake River Plains and adjoining Owyhee Uplands to 2522 m at Hayden Peak in the Owyhee Mountains. Where the Snake River Plain area is mostly sediment-covered basalt, the area south of the Snake River known as the Owyhee Uplands, includes rolling hills, sharply dissected by basaltic plateaus. The Owyhee Mountains have a complex geology, with steep slopes of both basalt and granite. In the northern areas of the Owyhee Mountains, the steep hills, mountains, and escarpments consist of basalt. In other areas of the mountains the steep slopes are of granitic or rhyolitic origin. The mountains are surrounded by broad expanses of sagebrush covered plateaus. The soils of the Snake River Plains are generally non-calcareous and alkaline. Most are well-drained, with common soil textures of silt loam, loam and fine sand loam. In the Uplands and Mountains, the soils are often coarse textured on the surface, while the subsoils are loamy and non-calcareous. -
Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G. -
Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota): New Species
A peer-reviewed open-access journal MycoKeysA 32: multi-gene 65–90 (2018) phylogeny of Chlorophyllum (Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota): new species... 65 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.32.23831 RESEARCH ARTICLE MycoKeys http://mycokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A multi-gene phylogeny of Chlorophyllum (Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota): new species, new combination and infrageneric classification Zai-Wei Ge1, Adriaana Jacobs2, Else C. Vellinga3, Phongeun Sysouphanthong4, Retha van der Walt2, Carmine Lavorato5, Yi-Feng An1, Zhu L. Yang1 1 Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China 2 National Collection of Fungi, Biosystematics Division, ARC, Plant Health and Protection, Queenswood 9012, Pretoria, South Africa 3 111 Koshland Hall 3102, Univer- sity of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3102, USA 4 Ecology Division, Biotechnology and Ecology Institute, Ministry of Science and Technology, P.O.Box: 2279, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR 5 C/da Calamia 10 – I-87069 San Demetrio Corone (CS), Italy Corresponding author: Zai-Wei Ge ([email protected]) Academic editor: S. Redhead | Received 23 January 2018 | Accepted 5 March 2018 | Published 20 March 2018 Citation: Ge Z-W, Jacobs A, Vellinga EC, Sysouphanthong P, van der Walt R, Lavorato C, An Y-F, Yang ZL (2018) A multi-gene phylogeny of Chlorophyllum (Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota): new species, new combination and infrageneric classification. MycoKeys 32: 65–90. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.32.23831 Abstract Taxonomic and phylogenetic studies of Chlorophyllum were carried out on the basis of morphological differences and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Based on the phylogeny inferred from the internal tran- scribed spacer (ITS), the partial large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrLSU), the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (rpb2) and translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1) sequences, six well-supported clades and 17 phylogenetic species are recognised. -
Complete References List
Aanen, D. K. & T. W. Kuyper (1999). Intercompatibility tests in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex in northwestern Europe. Mycologia 91: 783-795. Aanen, D. K., T. W. Kuyper, T. Boekhout & R. F. Hoekstra (2000). Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Hebeloma based on ITS1 and 2 sequences, with special emphasis on the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex. Mycologia 92: 269-281. Aanen, D. K. & T. W. Kuyper (2004). A comparison of the application of a biological and phenetic species concept in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex within a phylogenetic framework. Persoonia 18: 285-316. Abbott, S. O. & Currah, R. S. (1997). The Helvellaceae: Systematic revision and occurrence in northern and northwestern North America. Mycotaxon 62: 1-125. Abesha, E., G. Caetano-Anollés & K. Høiland (2003). Population genetics and spatial structure of the fairy ring fungus Marasmius oreades in a Norwegian sand dune ecosystem. Mycologia 95: 1021-1031. Abraham, S. P. & A. R. Loeblich III (1995). Gymnopilus palmicola a lignicolous Basidiomycete, growing on the adventitious roots of the palm sabal palmetto in Texas. Principes 39: 84-88. Abrar, S., S. Swapna & M. Krishnappa (2012). Development and morphology of Lysurus cruciatus--an addition to the Indian mycobiota. Mycotaxon 122: 217-282. Accioly, T., R. H. S. F. Cruz, N. M. Assis, N. K. Ishikawa, K. Hosaka, M. P. Martín & I. G. Baseia (2018). Amazonian bird's nest fungi (Basidiomycota): Current knowledge and novelties on Cyathus species. Mycoscience 59: 331-342. Acharya, K., P. Pradhan, N. Chakraborty, A. K. Dutta, S. Saha, S. Sarkar & S. Giri (2010). Two species of Lysurus Fr.: addition to the macrofungi of West Bengal. -
Lost Fungi Help Us Find Our Uncommon Victorian Fungi
Barry Lingham, CC-BY-SA Bruce Fuhrer © Lost fungi Help us find our uncommon Victorian fungi SJM McMullan-Fisher CC-BY-SA This project was funded with the support of the Victorian Government and assisted by Fungimap volunteers. Contents Fungi are important 2 Putting Victoria’s fungal biodiversity on the map 3 Lost fungi 4 Help us record our Lost fungi 7 Rich Survey Data Helps Conservation 8 Agarics Corals Amanita austroviridis group 9 Phaeoclavulina abietina 31 Arrhenia aff. chlorocyanea 11 Pins Asterophora mirabilis 13 Chlorovibrissea bicolor 33 Cortinarius metallicus 15 Crusts Cortinarius canarius 17 Hypocreopsis amplectens 35 Hygrocybe sp. ‘Warrandyte JCR2’ 19 Morels Mycena roseoflava 21 Morchella esculenta 37 Truffle-like Fungi Lichens Agaricus melanosporus 23 Lost Lichens 29 Toothed fungi Beenakia dacostae 25 Auriscalpium sp. ‘Blackwood’ 27 Polypores Laccocephalum hartmannii 29 Please Take Care 41 Acknowledgements 42 McMullan-Fisher SJM 2019 Version 4 Lost fungi. Fungimap CC-BY. Fungi are important Fungi are a megadiverse kingdom of the natural world, playing vital ecosystem roles as interconnected, symbiotic partners of plants, as food for animals and as nutrient recyclers. However: • distribution data for Australian fungi is patchy • just half of ~3000 of the known Victorian macrofungi species are formally described and only 3 are currently protected • data collection events such as ‘bioblitzes’ rarely record fungi • volunteer groups often lack the knowledge and tools to identify and report fungal observations Photographers taking pictures of the rare Stemless Earpick (above, SJM McMullan- Fisher CC-BY-SA) 2 Putting Victoria’s fungal biodiversity on the map This project has several parts, including information about recognizable fungi. -
José E. Sánchez, Gerardo Mata and Daniel J. Royse Editors
Updates on Tropical Mushrooms. Basic and Applied Research José E. Sánchez, Gerardo Mata and Daniel J. Royse Editors EE 635.8 U6 Updates on Tropical Mushrooms. Basic and applied research / José E. Sánchez, Gerardo Mata and Daniel J. Royse, editors.- San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, México: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, 2018. 227 p. : photographs, illustrations, maps, portraits; 22.7X17 cm. ISBN: 978-607-8429-60-8 It includes bibliography 1. Tropical mushrooms, 2. Agaricus, 3. Edible mushrooms, 4. Medicinal mushrooms, 5. Mushroom cultivation, 6. Biotechnology, 7 Mexico, 8. China, 9. Guatemala, 10 Cuba, I. Sánchez, José E. (editor), II. Mata Gerardo (editor). III. Royse, Daniel J. (editor). 1st. Edition, 2018 The content of this book was subjected to a process of blind peer reviewing according to rules established by the Editorial Committee of El Colegio de la Frontera Sur. DR © El Colegio de la Frontera Sur www.ecosur.mx El Colegio de la Frontera Sur Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur s/n Barrio de María Auxiliadora CP 29290 San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, México Photographies of the front page: clockwise, Agaricus subrufescens (D.C. Zied), Agaricus martinicensis (C. Angelini),. Lentinula boryana (G. Mata), Lepista nuda (M.C. Bran), Agaricus trisulphuratus (P. Callac), Sparassis latifolia (Lu Ma), L. boryana (G. Mata), S. latifolia (Lu Ma). At the center, A. subrufescens (G. Mata) No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without written permission from the editors. Printed and made in Mexico Acknowledgments Printing of this book was supported financially by Fondos Mixtos Conacyt through the Project FOMIX-13149 “Design, construction, equipment and startup of a state center for innovation and technology transfer for the development of coffee growing in Chiapas, Mexico” and through the Project MT-11063 of Ecosur “Social and environmental innovation in coffee growing areas for reducing vulnerability”. -
Contribution to the Study of Gasteroid and Secotioid Fungi of Chihuahua, Mexico
MYCOTAXON Volume 112, pp. 291–315 April–June 2010 Contribution to the study of gasteroid and secotioid fungi of Chihuahua, Mexico Gabriel Moreno1*, Marcos Lizárraga2, Martín Esqueda3 & Martha L. Coronado4 *[email protected] 1Dpto. de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Alcalá Alcalá de Henares, Madrid 28871, Spain 2Dpto. de Ciencias Básicas, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez Anillo Envolvente Pronaf y Estocolmo s/n, Cd. Juárez, Chihuahua 32300, México 3Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C. Apartado Postal 1735, Hermosillo, Sonora 83000, México 4Centro de Estudios Superiores del Estado de Sonora Apartado postal 11, Admón. 11, Hermosillo, Sonora 83000, México Abstract — Including the twenty-seven new records reported herein, fifty-seven taxa of gasteroid fungi are now known from Chihuahua. Geastrum schmidelii var. parvisporum represents a new record for the Mexican mycobiota. A nom. nov. is proposed for Agaricus texensis, which is an illegitimate later homonym. The species presented are annotated with observations on macro- and microscopic characters, and SEM photomicrographs illustrating spore and capillitial characters are included for selected taxa. Key words — Agaricomycetes, Gasteromycetes sensu lato, chorology, taxonomy Introduction Chihuahua, the largest state in Mexico, is located in the north and bordered by the Mexican states of Sonora to the west, Durango to the south, and Coahuila to the east and by the U.S. states of Texas and New Mexico to the north. The predominant vegetation types found in the state are coniferous forest, oak forest, grassland, xerophytic scrub, and tropical deciduous forest (Rzedowsky 1978). Prior to this study, thirty-one gasteroid taxa had previously been reported from Chihuahua. -
MYCOLEGIUM: Making Sense New Mushroom Genera: of a Ll T He Ne W Horn of Plenty Or Deluge? Mushroom Names Else C
Courtesy M. G. Wood. MYCOLEGIUM: Making Sense New mushroom genera: of a ll t he Ne w horn of plenty or deluge? Mushroom Names Else C. Vellinga and Thomas W. Kuyper [email protected] n 2014 and the first Text box #1 – Some definitions six months of 2015 clade – a monophyletic group consisting of a common ancestor and all its descendants. alone, more than 20 genus (plural: genera) – a monophyletic group of species that have (preferably) new bolete genera were morphological characters in common. I monophyletic – a genus is called monophyletic when all its members share a proposed. Contrary to what most recent common ancestor that is not shared by species outside that many people would expect, these genera genus (the red and blue blocks in Fig. 1 represent monophyletic groups). are not restricted to some faraway exotic A single species is monophyletic by definition. locale where the boletes have novel paraphyletic – a genus is called paraphyletic, when only by including members character combinations, no, these new of another genus or other genera, all its members share a common ancestor genus names are for familiar species that (the green block in Fig. 1 represents a paraphyletic genus). occur in North America and Europe and polyphyletic – a genus is called polyphyletic as a more advanced case of that we have been calling by the name paraphyly and the members of the genus are scattered over widely different “Boletus” for a long time. clades (example: Marasmius with M. androsaceus falling inside Gymnopus, This creation of new genera is not and M. minutus outside the family Marasmiaceae).