DOCSLIB.ORG

Hortus Botanicus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hortus Botanicus HORTUS BOTANICUS Международный электронный журнал ботанических садов 15 / 2020 Информационно-аналитический центр Совета ботанических садов России при Ботаническом саде Петрозаводского государственного университета HORTUS BOTANICUS Международный электронный журнал ботанических садов 15 / 2020 ISSN 1994-3849 Эл № ФС 77-33059 от 11.09.2008 Главный редактор А. А. Прохоров Редакционный совет Редакционная коллегия Редакция П. Вайс Джексон Г. С. Антипина Е. А. Платонова Лей Ши Е. М. Арнаутова С. М. Кузьменкова Йонг-Шик Ким А. В. Бобров К. О. Романова Т. С. Мамедов Ю. К. Виноградова А. Г. Марахтанов В. Н. Решетников Е. В. Голосова Е. Ф. Марковская Ю. В. Наумцев Е. В. Спиридович К. Г. Ткаченко А. И. Шмаков Адрес редакции 185910, Республика Карелия, г. Петрозаводск, ул. Красноармейская, 31, каб. 12. Е-mail:[email protected] http://hb.karelia.ru © 2001 - 2020 А. А. Прохоров На обложке: Партер в Центральном ботаническом саду НАН Беларуси. Фото Станислава Бакея. Разработка и техническая поддержка Отдел объединенной редакции научных журналов ПетрГУ, РЦ НИТ ПетрГУ, Ботанический сад ПетрГУ Петрозаводск 2020 HORTUS BOTANICUS, 2020, T. 15, Url: http://hb.karelia.ru/ ISSN 1994-3849 Эл № ФС 77-33059 Каталог гербария сосудистых растений Центрального ботанического сада НАН Беларуси (MSKH). Anthophyta: Dicotyledones Центральный ботанический сад НАН Беларуси, КУЗЬМЕНКОВА ул. Сурганова, 2в, Минск, 22012, Беларусь Светлана Михайловна [email protected] Объединенный институт проблем информатики НАН Беларуси, НОСИЛОВСКИЙ ул. Сурганова, д. 6, Минск, 220012, Беларусь Олег Александрович [email protected] Ключевые слова: Аннотация: Гербарий Центрального ботанического каталог, ботанические сада НАН Беларуси (MSKH) создается для изучения и коллекции, гербарий, документирования состава культурной флоры Центральный ботанический Беларуси, в том числе растений из коллекций сад, ЦБС, Национальная Центрального ботанического сада НАН Беларуси, для академия наук Беларуси, сохранения образцов растений, собранных на других MSKH, сосудистые растения, территориях. В каталоге представлены названия не Anthophyta, Dicotyledones менее 5 тысяч видов и внутривидовых таксонов из 1049 родов 165 семейств сосудистых растений (Anthophyta: Dicotyledones). Получена: 05 декабря 2019 года Подписана к печати: 13 февраля 2020 года Введение Гербарий Центрального ботанического сада Национальной академии наук Беларуси основан в 1932 году. Современная история начинается с 1953, так как во время Великой Отечественной войны коллекции были утрачены. Регистрация в Index Herbariorum выполнена в 2003 году, получен индекс MSKH (Additions to Index Herbariorum, 2003). В этой коллекции представлены сборы сосудистых растений, выращиваемых в Беларуси, из природы (Беларусь, Россия, Украина, Таджикистан, Киргизия и другие территории). Наибольшую ценность, по-видимому, представляют образцы растений из коллекций ЦБС и сборы, выполненные в садах, парках, на коллекциях других ботанических учреждений Беларуси. На ноябрь 2019 года коллекции включают не менее 34 тысяч гербарных образцов, в фонде для открытого пользования 26,5 тысяч; в том числе Anthophyta: Dicotyledones – 23,9 тысяч листов (90,2 %). Каталогизация сборов – один из этапов изучения коллекций, в том числе гербарных. В Республике Беларусь наиболее значимым ботаническим коллекциям присвоен статус национального достояния, поэтому издание каталогов этих коллекций в последние 42 HORTUS BOTANICUS, 2020, T. 15, Url: http://hb.karelia.ru/ ISSN 1994-3849 Эл № ФС 77-33059 десятилетия проводится регулярно (Каталог травянистых …, 1999; Каталог тропических …, 1999, 2008; Каталог географических сборов …. 1999; Каталог сосудистых …, 2010; Каталог белорусской коллекции непатогенных микроорганизмов, 2006-2017 и др.). Каталог гербария MSKH в таком объеме публикуется впервые, в него вошли названия не менее 5 тысячи видов и внутривидовых таксонов из 1049 родов 165 семейств двудольных растений. Список таксонов стало возможным собрать благодаря использованию информационных технологий, в том числе баз данных, при инвентаризации MSKH и при текущем этикетаже листов (Кузьменкова и др., 2017). Правильность написания таксонов проверена по информационным ресурсам (Tropicos, 2018; The International Plant Names Index, 2018; Provisional Global Plant Checklist, 2018), книге С. К. Черепанова "Сосудистые растения России и сопредельных государств" (СПб., 1995). Роды отнесены к семействам, перечисленным James L. Reveal (2006) в цифровой версии Concordance of Angiosperm Family Names: для решения утилитарной задачи раскладки гербарных листов по шкафам (родов в семейства внутри секторов) выбираются семейства наименьшего объема. Условные обозначения: ▲ – собрано на коллекциях Центрального ботанического сада НАН Беларуси; ● – собрано на коллекциях ЦБС, других ботанических учреждений, в садах, цветниках и парках Беларуси и в природе (первичный и/или вторичный ареалы). Основная часть Anthophyta: Dicotyledones Семейство Acanthaceae Acanthus mollis L. ▲ Barleria micans Nees ▲ Barleria repens Nees ‘Orange Bugle’ ▲ Eranthemum tricolor W. Bull ▲ Eremomastax polysperma (Benth.) Dandy ▲ Fittonia verschaffeltii (Lem.) Van Houtte ‘Bianco Verde’ ▲ Hypoestes sanguinolente . ▲ Justicia brandegeeana Wassh. et L. B. Sm. ▲ Justicia brandegeeana Wassh. et L. B. Sm. ‘Yellow Queen’ ▲ Pseuderanthemum seticalyx Stapf ▲ Ruellia caroliniensis (J. F. Gmel.) Steud. ▲ 43 HORTUS BOTANICUS, 2020, T. 15, Url: http://hb.karelia.ru/ ISSN 1994-3849 Эл № ФС 77-33059 Ruellia graecizans Backer ▲ Ruellia mahouana hort. ▲ Ruellia portellae Hook. fil. ▲ Sanchezia nobilis Hook. fil. ▲ Strobilanthes dyerianus Mast. ▲ Thunbergia affinis S. Moore ▲ Thunbergia coccinea Wall. ▲ Whitfieldia elongata Hook. ▲ Семейство Aceraceae Acer aidzuense (Franch.) Nakai ● Acer barbinerve Maxim. ● Acer buergerianum Miq. Acer californicum (Torr. et A. Gray) D. Dietr. ● Acer campestre L. ● Acer campestre L. f. suberosa ● Acer campestre L. var. austriaca Acer cappadocicum Gled. ● Acer carpinifolium Siebold et Zucc. Acer caudatum Wall. ▲ Acer cinerascens Boiss. ▲ Acer circinatum Pursh ● Acer cissifolium (Siebold et Zucc.) C. Koch Acer davidii Franch. Acer divergens C. Koch ex Pax Acer ginnala Maxim. ● Acer glabrum Torr. ● Acer griseum (Franch.) Pax Acer grosseri Pax 44 HORTUS BOTANICUS, 2020, T. 15, Url: http://hb.karelia.ru/ ISSN 1994-3849 Эл № ФС 77-33059 Acer heldreichii Orph. ex Boiss. ● Acer heldreichii Orph. ex Boiss. f. purpuratum ▲ Acer henryi Pax ▲ Acer hersii Rehder Acer hyrcanum Fisch. et C. A. Mey. ● Acer ibericum Bieb. Acer insigne Boiss. et Buhse Acer insigne Boiss. et Buhse var. velutinum Acer japonicum Thunb. ● Acer komarovii Pojark. Acer laevigatum Wall. Acer leucoderme Small ▲ Acer lobelii Ten. ● Acer mandshuricum Maxim. ● Acer mayrii Schwer. ● Acer miyabei Maxim. ● Acer mono Maxim. ● Acer monspessulanum L. ● Acer negundo L. ● Acer negundo L. f. auratum ● Acer negundo L. ssp. californicum ▲ Acer negundo L. var. aureo-variegatum ● Acer nikoense Maxim. ● Acer obtusatum Waldst. et Kit. ex Willd. Acer oliverianum Pax Acer palmatum Thunb. Acer pensylvanicum L. ● Acer platanoides L. ● 45 HORTUS BOTANICUS, 2020, T. 15, Url: http://hb.karelia.ru/ ISSN 1994-3849 Эл № ФС 77-33059 Acer platanoides L. ‘Crimson King’ ● Acer platanoides L. f. argenteo-marginatum Acer platanoides L. f. drummondii ● Acer platanoides L. f. globosum Acer platanoides L. f. palmatifidum ● Acer platanoides L. f. schwedleri ▲ Acer pseudoplatanus L. ● Acer pseudoplatanus L. f. leopoldii ● Acer pseudoplatanus L. f. purpurascens Acer pseudoplatanus L. f. purpureum Acer pseudosieboldianum (Pax) Kom. ● Acer pubescens Franch. ● Acer rubrum L. ● Acer rufinerve Siebold et Zucc. ● Acer saccharinum L. ● Acer saccharinum L. f. wieri Acer saccharinum L. var. subtrilobatum Acer saccharum Marshall ▲ Acer semenovii Regel et Herder ● Acer serratum Pax Acer sp. Acer spicatum Lam. ▲ Acer stevenii Pojark. Acer tataricum L. ● Acer tataricum L. × A. ginnala Maxim. ▲ Acer tegmentosum Maxim. ● Acer tetramerum Pax ▲ Acer trautvetteri Medw. 46 HORTUS BOTANICUS, 2020, T. 15, Url: http://hb.karelia.ru/ ISSN 1994-3849 Эл № ФС 77-33059 Acer truncatum Bunge Acer tschonoskii Maxim. Acer turcomanicum Pojark. Acer turkestanicum Pax ● Acer ukurunduense Trautv. et C. A. Mey. ● Acer velutinum Boiss. ● Семейство Actinidiaceae Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. ● Actinidia chinensis Planch. ▲ Actinidia kolomikta (Maxim.) Maxim. ● Actinidia polygama (Siebold et Zucc.) Miq. ● Семейство Adoxaceae Adoxa moschatellina L. Семейство Aizoaceae Dorotheanthus bellidiformis N. E. Br. ▲ Dorotheanthus gramineus Schwantes ▲ Семейство Amaranthaceae Amaranthus albus L. Amaranthus blitum L. Amaranthus cruentus L. ▲ Amaranthus paniculatus L. ‘Pygmy Torch’ ▲ Amaranthus retroflexus L. ● Celosia huttonii Mast. ‘Pink Flamingo’ ▲ Gomphrena globosa L. f. rosea ▲ Gomphrena globosa L. f. viola ▲ 47 HORTUS BOTANICUS, 2020, T. 15, Url: http://hb.karelia.ru/ ISSN 1994-3849 Эл № ФС 77-33059 Семейство Anacardiaceae Cotinus coggygria Scop. ● Harpephyllum caffrum Bernh. ex Krauss ▲ Rhus aromatica Aiton ▲ Rhus coriaria L. Rhus typhina L. ● Schinus molle L. ▲ Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi ▲ Toxicodendron orientale Greene Toxicodendron trichocarpum (Miq.) Kuntze Семейство Annonaceae Annona cherimola Mill. ▲ Annona hybrida hort. ▲ Artabotrys hexapetalus (L. fil.) Bhandari ▲ Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook. fil. et Thomson ▲ Polyalthia suberosa (Roxb.) Thwaites ▲ Семейство Apiaceae Aegopodium alpestre Ledeb. Aegopodium podagraria L. Aegopodium podagraria L. f. variegata Aethusa cynapium L. ▲ Anethum graveolens L. ● Angelica archangelica
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (1999) Plant Systematics
    CHAPTER8 Phylogenetic Relationships of Angiosperms he angiosperms (or flowering plants) are the dominant group of land Tplants. The monophyly of this group is strongly supported, as dis- cussed in the previous chapter, and these plants are possibly sister (among extant seed plants) to the gnetopsids (Chase et al. 1993; Crane 1985; Donoghue and Doyle 1989; Doyle 1996; Doyle et al. 1994). The angio- sperms have a long fossil record, going back to the upper Jurassic and increasing in abundance as one moves through the Cretaceous (Beck 1973; Sun et al. 1998). The group probably originated during the Jurassic, more than 140 million years ago. Cladistic analyses based on morphology, rRNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences do not support the traditional division of angiosperms into monocots (plants with a single cotyledon, radicle aborting early in growth with the root system adventitious, stems with scattered vascular bundles and usually lacking secondary growth, leaves with parallel venation, flow- ers 3-merous, and pollen grains usually monosulcate) and dicots (plants with two cotyledons, radicle not aborting and giving rise to mature root system, stems with vascular bundles in a ring and often showing sec- ondary growth, leaves with a network of veins forming a pinnate to palmate pattern, flowers 4- or 5-merous, and pollen grains predominantly tricolpate or modifications thereof) (Chase et al. 1993; Doyle 1996; Doyle et al. 1994; Donoghue and Doyle 1989). In all published cladistic analyses the “dicots” form a paraphyletic complex, and features such as two cotyle- dons, a persistent radicle, stems with vascular bundles in a ring, secondary growth, and leaves with net venation are plesiomorphic within angio- sperms; that is, these features evolved earlier in the phylogenetic history of tracheophytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lilioceris Egena Air Potato Biocontrol Environmental Assessment
    United States Department of Field Release of the Beetle Agriculture Lilioceris egena (Coleoptera: Marketing and Regulatory Chrysomelidae) for Classical Programs Biological Control of Air Potato, Dioscorea bulbifera (Dioscoreaceae), in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, February 2021 Field Release of the Beetle Lilioceris egena (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) for Classical Biological Control of Air Potato, Dioscorea bulbifera (Dioscoreaceae), in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, February 2021 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Condition Assessment Horseshoe Bend National Military Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Horseshoe Bend National Military Park Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2015/981 ON THE COVER Photo of the Tallapoosa River, viewed from Horseshoe Bend National Military Park Photo Courtesy of Elle Allen Natural Resource Condition Assessment Horseshoe Bend National Military Park Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2015/981 JoAnn M. Burkholder, Elle H. Allen, Stacie Flood, and Carol A. Kinder Center for Applied Aquatic Ecology North Carolina State University 620 Hutton Street, Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27606 June 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Australia's Grazing Industries by Garden
    final report Project Code: NBP.357 Prepared by: Jenny Barker, Rod Randall,Tony Grice Co-operative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management Date published: May 2006 ISBN: 1 74036 781 2 PUBLISHED BY Meat and Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Abstract This report identifies 281 introduced garden plants and 800 lower priority species that present a significant risk to Australia’s grazing industries should they naturalise. Of the 281 species: • Nearly all have been recorded overseas as agricultural or environmental weeds (or both); • More than one tenth (11%) have been recorded as noxious weeds overseas; • At least one third (33%) are toxic and may harm or even kill livestock; • Almost all have been commercially available in Australia in the last 20 years; • Over two thirds (70%) were still available from Australian nurseries in 2004; • Over two thirds (72%) are not currently recognised as weeds under either State or Commonwealth legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Antivenin Plants Used for Treatment of Snakebites in Uganda
    Omara et al. Tropical Medicine and Health (2020) 48:6 Tropical Medicine https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0187-0 and Health REVIEW Open Access Antivenin plants used for treatment of snakebites in Uganda: ethnobotanical reports and pharmacological evidences Timothy Omara1,2* , Sarah Kagoya3,4, Abraham Openy5, Tom Omute6, Stephen Ssebulime7, Kibet Mohamed Kiplagat8 and Ocident Bongomin9 Abstract Snakebite envenomation is a serious public health concern in rural areas of Uganda. Snakebites are poorly documented in Uganda because most occur in rural settings where traditional therapists end up being the first-line defense for treatment. Ethnobotanical surveys in Uganda have reported that some plants are used to antagonize the activity of various snake venoms. This review was sought to identify antivenin plants in Uganda and some pharmacological evidence supporting their use. A literature survey done in multidisciplinary databases revealed that 77 plant species belonging to 65 genera and 42 families are used for the treatment of snakebites in Uganda. The majority of these species belong to family Fabaceae (31%), Euphorbiaceae (14%), Asteraceae (12%), Amaryllidaceae (10%) and Solanaceae (10%). The main growth habit of the species is shrubs (41%), trees (33%) and herbs (18%). Antivenin extracts are usually prepared from roots (54%) and leaves (23%) through decoctions, infusions, powders, and juices, and are administered orally (67%) or applied topically (17%). The most frequently encountered species were Allium cepa, Carica papaya, Securidaca longipedunculata, Harrisonia abyssinica, and Nicotiana tabacum. Species with global reports of tested antivenom activity included Allium cepa, Allium sativum, Basella alba, Capparis tomentosa, Carica papaya, Cassia occidentalis, Jatropa carcus, Vernonia cinereal, Bidens pilosa, Hoslundia opposita, Maytensus senegalensis, Securinega virosa, and Solanum incanum.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliaria Petiolata
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 7-2015 Alliaria petiolata (M.Bieb.) Cavara & Grande [Brassicaceae], an Invasive Herb in the Southern Ozark Plateaus: A Comparison of Species Composition and Richness, Soil Properties, and Earthworm Composition and Biomass in Invaded Versus Non-Invaded Sites Jennifer D. Ogle University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Botany Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Ogle, Jennifer D., "Alliaria petiolata (M.Bieb.) Cavara & Grande [Brassicaceae], an Invasive Herb in the Southern Ozark Plateaus: A Comparison of Species Composition and Richness, Soil Properties, and Earthworm Composition and Biomass in Invaded Versus Non-Invaded Sites" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 1185. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1185 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Alliaria petiolata (M.Bieb.) Cavara & Grande [Brassicaceae], an Invasive Herb in the Southern Ozark Plateaus: A Comparison of Species Composition and Richness, Soil Properties, and Earthworm Composition and Biomass in Invaded Versus Non-Invaded Sites Alliaria petiolata (M.Bieb.) Cavara & Grande [Brassicaceae], an Invasive Herb in the Southern Ozark Plateaus: A Comparison of Species Composition and Richness, Soil Properties, and Earthworm Composition and Biomass in Invaded Versus Non-Invaded Sites A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology by Jennifer D.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Caterpillar House!
    Welcome to the Caterpillar House! Job Description Short Script F.A.Q. Glossary Caterpillar Instars Caterpillar Species Profiles Buckeye Cecropia Moth Eastern Black Swallowtail Julia Longwing Monarch Pipevine Swallowtail Saddleback Caterpillar/Slug Moth Spicebush Swallowtail Zebra Longwing Job Description Thank you for volunteering in the Caterpillar House! Your goal is to engage visitors with the other important and interesting stages in a butterfly’s life and prepare visitors to enter the Flight House. Here are the key aspects of managing the Caterpillar House: One door at a time. Only one set of doors should be open at a time to minimize the possibility of butterflies escaping. The screen doors should always be locked from the outside. Open the screen door for visitors. Once the group has entered, pull the screen door closed until it clicks. After interpreting the display and preparing visitors to enter, open the doors to the Flight House. Manage the size of the groups. We recommend taking between 10-15 people at one time. People should not reach over the purple fence. Pointing at and/or touching stresses the caterpillars and causes them to stop eating. This stress can lead to health problems down the line. Tell guests to look for caterpillars next to the red ribbons. Focus on the WOW! The best way to engage visitors is to focus on what makes these animals unique and interesting. In the Short Script we’ve highlighted the main information we’d like you to share with visitors. For more interesting background information, check out the Caterpillar Species Profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Polydamas Swallowtail, Gold Rim, Tailless Swallowtail, Battus Polydamas Lucayus (Rothschild & Jordan) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionidae: Troidini)1 Donald W
    EENY-062 Polydamas Swallowtail, Gold Rim, Tailless Swallowtail, Battus polydamas lucayus (Rothschild & Jordan) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionidae: Troidini)1 Donald W. Hall2 Introduction The name Battus is from Battus I, founder of the ancient Greek colony Cyrenaica and its capital, Cyrene, in Africa. The Polydamas swallowtail is one of only two US swal- The specific epithet polydamas is from Polydamas, a charac- lowtails of the genus Battus. It is our only US swallowtail ter from Greek mythology (Opler and Krizek 1984). without tails (Figure 1). Larvae of the Polydamas swallowtail and those of the other swallowtails belonging to the tribe Troidini feed exclusively on plants in the genus Aristolochia and are commonly referred to as the Aristolochia swallowtails. Distribution In the United States, Battus polydamas lucayus occurs as a regular resident in peninsular Florida and the Florida Keys, and occasional strays wander to other Gulf states and as far north as Missouri and Kentucky (Scott 1986). Subspe- cies polydamas occurs in southern Texas (Figure 2) (dos Figure 1. Polydamas swallowtail (Battus polydamas lucayus [Rothschild Passos 1940). & Jordan]). Credits: Donald W. Hall, UF/IFAS Nomenclature The Polydamas swallowtail was originally described and named Papilio polydamas by Linnaeus but was later transferred to the genus Battus (Scopoli 1777) and selected as type species of the genus by Lindsey (1925). 1. This document is EENY-062, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date November 1998. Revised July 2010, August 2011, October 2015, August 2016, March 2017 and March 2020. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of the Natchez Trace Parkway
    THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (Franklin, Tennessee to Natchez, Mississippi) Results of a Floristic Inventory August 2004 - August 2006 © Dale A. Kruse, 2007 © Dale A. Kruse 2007 DATE SUBMITTED 28 February 2008 PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATORS Stephan L. Hatch Dale A. Kruse S. M. Tracy Herbarium (TAES), Texas A & M University 2138 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2138 SUBMITTED TO Gulf Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Lafayette, Louisiana CONTRACT NUMBER J2115040013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The “Natchez Trace” has played an important role in transportation, trade, and communication in the region since pre-historic times. As the development and use of steamboats along the Mississippi River increased, travel on the Trace diminished and the route began to be reclaimed by nature. A renewed interest in the Trace began during, and following, the Great Depression. In the early 1930’s, then Mississippi congressman T. J. Busby promoted interest in the Trace from a historical perspective and also as an opportunity for employment in the area. Legislation was introduced by Busby to conduct a survey of the Trace and in 1936 actual construction of the modern roadway began. Development of the present Natchez Trace Parkway (NATR) which follows portions of the original route has continued since that time. The last segment of the NATR was completed in 2005. The federal lands that comprise the modern route total about 52,000 acres in 25 counties through the states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. The route, about 445 miles long, is a manicured parkway with numerous associated rest stops, parks, and monuments. Current land use along the NATR includes upland forest, mesic prairie, wetland prairie, forested wetlands, interspersed with numerous small agricultural croplands.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Crabbea Harv. (Acanthaceae) in Southern Africa
    Systematics of Crabbea Harv. (Acanthaceae) in southern Africa By Nelson Alexander Mendes de Gouveia Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE In the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Department of Plant Sciences (Botany) University of the Free State January 2017 Supervisor: Dr. L. Joubert Co-supervisor: Dr. M. Jackson LIST OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments viii List of Abbreviations x List of Figures xv List of Tables xix Summary xxii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Diversity and distribution 1 1.2 Economic and cultural significance 2 1.3 Previous taxonomic treatments of Crabbea 3 1.4 Motivation and aim 5 Chapter 2: Literature Review 7 2.1 Taxonomy and historical review 7 2.2 Phylogenetic study of Acanthaceae and Crabbea 21 i 2.2.1 Gene regions used in Acanthaceae phylogenetic studies 23 2.2.1.1 ITS 23 2.2.1.2 trnL-trnF 26 2.2.1.3 rps16 intron 28 Chapter 3: Leaf Micromorphology 30 3.1 Introduction 30 3.2 Materials and Methods 32 3.3 Results 36 3.3.1 Genus description of leaf micromorphology of southern African Crabbea species 36 3.3.2 Leaf micromorphology measurements of the southern African Crabbea species 37 3.3.3 Description of leaf micromorphology among southern species of African Crabbea 39 3.3.3.1 Crabbea acaulis 39 3.3.3.2 Crabbea angustifolia 42 3.3.3.3 Crabbea cirsioides 45 3.3.3.4 Crabbea galpinii 48 3.3.3.5 Crabbea nana 51 3.3.3.6 Crabbea ovalifolia 54 3.3.3.7 Crabbea pedunculata 57 ii 3.3.3.8 Crabbea velutina 60 3.4 Discussion and Conclusion 63 3.5 Leaf micromorphology identification
    [Show full text]