The Report Can Be Downloaded Here

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Report Can Be Downloaded Here Innocent Mistakes A Controversial Film Finds Journalism Caught Between Image and Reality INNOCENT MISTAKES About the authors: Danica Ilic is web editor for Media Diversity Institute and a freelance journalist with the BBC World Service Anser Hassan is an American journalist currently completing a masters degree at the London School of Economics Kamal Siddiqi is Editor of the Pakistan English daily newspaper Express-Tribune Beatrice White is a journalist and desk editor with Hürriyet Daily News in Istanbul Editor: Aidan White Design: Milos Petrov Published by EJN, May 14th 2013. CONTENTS SUMMARY BACKGROUND UNITED STATES: FOCUS ON THE FOREIGN ANGLE Anser Hassan UNITED STATES: MEDIA BIAS AND THE ANTI-ISLAM MESSAGE Danica Ilic UNITED KINGDOM: MEDIA CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE Danica Ilic PAKISTAN: POLITICAL INTERFERENCE AND TWO FACES OF MEDIA Kamal Siddiqi TURKEY: LIMITED PROTEST AND RAGING DEBATE Beatrice White CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INNOCENT MISTAKES Summary This report reviews media coverage of the Innocence of Muslims, a short film trailer produced by a religious activist and distributed over the Internet, which became the spark for protest and violence across the globe and leading to at least 75 deaths. film Innocence of Muslims Still photo from the Still photo from 4 SUMMARY The film was, by all accounts, a low- for instance, some politicians openly Many responsible budget and amateurish production encouraged violence and endorsed media sought yet it was given enormous publicity the provocative hate speech found in balance in their and was used to reinforce deep some sections of media. reporting and tried divisions between western and to correct their Muslim religious cultures. This report, based upon extensive errors, but many interviews with journalists, academics more did not. Coverage of the film has raised and media leaders, is narrowly focused concerns about the influence of and looks at coverage of the film deeply-embedded stereotypes in in a number of sample countries - media reporting. In this case editorial the United States, United Kingdom, failings, albeit inadvertently, may Pakistan and Turkey - all of them have reinforced prejudice and places where terrorism and religious misunderstanding. extremism has left its mark. The report highlights major editorial The report concludes that: mistakes including failure to establish the truth about the film’s origins; the • Online media and social networks uncorrected circulation of false infor- reinforced the impact of media mation about the film; a lamentable mistakes and played a significant role lack of reporting of voices calling for in circulating false information in the peaceful and non-violent protest; first days of the crisis. Although there and a general failure to provide were many instances of restraint context which explained the reasons and caution, both online and offline, for violence and who was behind it. there was a general failure to correct these damaging initial impressions; Many responsible media sought balance in their reporting and tried • Additionally, in the United States to correct their errors, but many more and the United Kingdom, media did not. In some countries, Pakistan may have exaggerated the strength 5 INNOCENT MISTAKES of feeling in response to the film in • Create a global databank of the Muslim community. Media in media best practices to help both countries struggled to provide journalists avoid hate speech and to balance in their coverage and failed strengthen levels of professionalism; to provide adequate context to explain the origins of violence; • Establish a specific reporting process that will monitor media in • In Pakistan religious parties and key countries and report annually on extremists dominated the news coverage of incidents of hate speech agenda of mass circulation, local- or acts of false, provocative or uneth- language media while moderate ical journalism particularly in the field Muslim voices in the mainstream of reporting religious affairs or relations were largely marginalized. between different communities; At the same time, senior political • Promote more debate within figures supported actions designed journalism and the wider community to encourage protest and to incite on the need to raise awareness on violence. the dangers of hate speech arising from use of online communications • In Turkey media were largely and social networks; uncritical as government leaders sought to use the controversy to • Encourage more research into build a platform for launching an aspects of media performance that international campaign to strengthen have raised concern in this case laws of blasphemy. including verification of potentially inflammatory information prior to The report also highlights research publication; publication of corrections that shows how minority religious and clarifications of false information; or activist groups from the fringes use of extremist and minority voices; of politics receive disproportionate and the need for media to use more attention in American media. representative and relevant sources to achieve context, balance and It concludes with some recommen- impartiality. dations for raising awareness within media on the dangers of hate speech including proposals to: 6 SUMMARY Finally, although this report is not Above all, it illustrates how journalism exhaustive it highlights failings in must be alert to the dangers of hate media coverage of this controversial speech and the casual manipulation film that should be troubling for of media by unscrupulous political journalists everywhere. It points to groups. the need for accuracy and context in the reporting and analysis of events when they have an impact on the Aidan White fragile relations between different Director cultures and communities. Ethical Journalism Network A p r o t e s t a g a i n s t I n n o c e n c e M u s l i m , i n f r o n t o f t h e U S A e m b a s s y o n S e p t e m b e r 2 2 , 2 0 1 2 . K u a l a L u m p u r ( A m i r R i d h w a n / S h u t t e r s t o c k . c o m ) INNOCENT MISTAKES Background The film Innocence of Muslims came to prominence in July 2012 when it was uploaded to YouTube, the video file-sharing website. Arabic language versions, this time with anti-Islamic content, were added in the first days of September 2012, with post-production dubbing which changed the original dialogue without the actors’ knowledge.1 film Innocence of Muslims Still photo from the Still photo from BACKGROUND The video focused on the persecution blasphemy and became the subject of the Christian Copt community of incendiary comment. It led to in Egypt, with claims of a rise in the issuing of Fatwas - Islamic legal growing religious intolerance and rulings, often misinterpreted as death sectarian violence from the Muslim sentences - against the video’s majority against the Christian group participants and, famously, to one which makes up 10% of the Egyptian government minister in Pakistan population. offering a bounty for the death of the producer. The film was perceived as denigrating Islam and the prophet Mohammed The film was particularly controversial and its Arabic version led to wide- because it was linked with claims spread protests around September 11 reported by leading media such as - the 11th anniversary of the terrorist the Associated Press that it had been attacks on Washington and New financed by 100 Jewish investors. This York - particularly in Egypt, but also report first appeared on September in many other Muslim nations and in 12th 2012. An extensive correction some western countries. was issued two days later. One of those protests, in Benghazi, While the film was eventually revealed was used as a cover by armed terror- to be the work of a Coptic Christian ists for an attack on the American of Egyptian origins, the myth that mission in Libya and the killing of Jews produced and financed the film United States Ambassador J. Chris- in an effort to insult the Prophet topher Stevens and three of his staff. Mohammed and Islam had gone viral. In all, the protests led to hundreds of It provided a spark that militants and injuries and more than 75 deaths. extremist groups used to give fresh momentum to anti-western sentiment The film sparked new debates about across much of the Middle East and free speech, internet censorship and the Islamic world. 1 See http://www.youtube.com/verify_controversy?next_url=/watch%3Fv%3DUDd6bine9io The film is 13 minutes long and a trailer for a longer film that has never been completed or shown. 9 INNOCENT MISTAKES a A g n a i I n n s d t i t a h n e p a r n o t t i e - I s s t l e a m r k i f c l k m s , a The man responsible was Mark American. He later admitted the film i t The Film’s aim was n a C n h Basseley Youssef, alias Nakoula cost between $50,000 and $60,000 i to insult, provoke e m n a n g Basseley Nakoula, and also known and was shot in a little over 12 days. a confrontation and e i , o I n f d reinforce divisions. as Sam Bacile, the name he used in The money, he said, came from his t i h a e , his discussions with the Associated wife’s family in Egypt. o A In this sense it was of n m S e e r Press. p i use only to a small, c t a e n m f Although media coverage gave narrow community b a e g r 1 o of political activists Two months after the film controversy the impression that this was a major 4 n , a 2 0 w broke Youssef was sent to prison by production, it was nothing of the sort.
Recommended publications
  • East-West Center Association Chapters
    04/11/18 EAST-WEST CENTER ASSOCIATION CHAPTERS There are nearly 50 East-West Center Association chapters who are active throughout the Asia Pacific region and the United States. The goal of each chapter is to support the Center by broadening its outreach throughout the region. Chapters facilitate professional networking through a variety of activities, including informal get-togethers, seminars, lectures, and work- shops. Chapters also support the East-West Center by helping recruit qualified participants for its programs, increasing awareness of the Center, raising funds, and carrying out community service projects. Constituent chapters have recently been formed to bring together alumni with special interests. Please contact these chapter leaders or liaisons for information about how you can participate in their local activities: EAST ASIA Seoul Bangkok Prof. Won Nyon Kim Dr. Naris Chaiyasoot Beijing (POP 81-84) (PI 78-83, 85) Dr. Hao Ping Professor Chairman (ASDP 93-96) Korea University Banpu Power Public Company Limited Vice Minister of Education Seoul, Korea Bangkok, Thailand People’s Republic of China Phone: 82-10-9237-7011 Cell: +66-0-818372777 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +66-0-28836778 Communication Liaison: Shanghai E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Hongxia Zhang TBA (RSCH 2009) Dili Program Operations Director, Save the Children China Taipei Mr. Carlos Peloi dos Reis Program Mr. Frank Hung (USET 02-05) Beijing, China (ISI 1965-67) Monitoring and Evaluation Analyst Cell: 86-13621250424 CEO United Nations Development Programme [UNDP], E-mail: [email protected] HPO, Inc. Timor-Leste Taipei, Taiwan Obrigadu Barack, Caicoli Hong Kong Cell: 886-932-150-220 Dili Chapter Leader Liaison: E-mail: [email protected] Timor-Leste Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Peaceful Coexistence of India and Pakistan Suminu Ahmed Consultant, the Asia Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
    - - m @ 0 a0 0 e 0 a 0 e 8 0 0 0 e0 e 0 0 Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy 0 by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United 0 either the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of any -of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any e0 implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or 0 represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific 0 commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the e United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. 0 The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United e States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. e Printed in the United States of America. This report has been reproduced directly from the best a available copy. ae Available to DOE and DOE contractors from 0 Office of Scientific and Technical Information e e e 0 Prices available from (615) 576-8401, FTS 626-8401 e Available to the public from 0 National Technical Information Service a US Department of Commerce e 5285 Port Royal Rd. Springfjeld, VA 221 61 e NTlS price codes e Printed
    [Show full text]
  • Blasphemy, Charlie Hebdo, and the Freedom of Belief and Expression
    Blasphemy, Charlie Hebdo, and the Freedom of Belief and Expression The Paris attacks and the reactions rashad ali The horrific events in Paris, with the killing of a group of Other reactions highlight and emphasise the fact journalists, a Police officer, and members of the Jewish that Muslims are also victims of terrorism – often the community in France have shocked and horrified most main victims – a point which Charlie Hebdo made in commentators. These atrocities, which the Yemen branch an editorial of the first issue of the magazine published of the global terrorist group al-Qaeda have claimed the following the attack on its staff. Still others highlight responsibility for,1 have led to condemnations from that Jews were targeted merely because they were Jews.2 across the political spectrum and across religious divides. This was even more relevant given how a BBC journalist Some ubiquitous slogans that have arisen, whether appeared to suggest that there was a connection between Je suis Charlie, Ahmed, or Juif, have been used to show how “Jews” treated Palestinians in Israel and the killing of empathy with various victims of these horrid events. Jews in France in a kosher shop.3 These different responses illustrate some of the divides in The most notorious response arguably has not come public reaction, with solidarity shown to various camps. from Islamist circles but from the French neo-fascist For example, some have wished to show support and comedian Dieudonne for stating on his Facebook solidarity with the victims but have not wished to imply account “je me sens Charlie Coulibaly” (“I feel like Charlie or show support to Charlie Hebdo as a publication, Coulibaly”).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter I Introduction
    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION This first chapter outlines the main background and problem identification as the introductory gate of the research in order to have a better a comprehension toward the research topic. I.1. Background In mass communication, the written culture has progressively been overshadowed by an audiovisual culture. Parsa (2004) explains that in the present day, what was previously pages worth of documentation could easily be told in a 2-hour movie or a 60-minute documentary. An emphasis on visual messages does not necessarily mean that words are less important. The most powerful and meaningful messages are combined with words and pictures. Considering the rapid developments in technology, we are gradually moving toward a visually mediated society. The world has been caught up in an ever-flowing process, which can only be explained through the unique rules of an ‘audio-visual language’ with the invention of photographs, cinemas and televisions, which are used to record both still and moving images, although the ‘written language’ is still remains fundamental to the construction of meaning and the meaning itself. To facilitate a better understanding toward the written narratives, supporting images can be found in cinemas, newspapers, magazines, books, posters, computer screens, television screens, clothes and even restaurant menus. (Parsa 2002, 844). Image has in fact a dual nature, being both concrete and capable of expressing larger meanings symbolically and metaphorically as it speaks within an experiential, assosiationistic, and holistic logic (Barry 1997, 122). Parsa (2004) tries to break down the strength of visual image that differs from written text, as quoted from Schneider & Raue: 1 Visual image is neither good nor bad information compared to texts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign for Justice: Press Freedom in South Asia 2013-14
    THE CAMPAIGN FOR JUSTICE: PRESS FREEDOM IN SOUTH ASIA 2013-14 The Campaign for Justice PRESS FREEDOM IN SOUTH ASIA 2013-14 1 TWELFTH ANNUAL IFJ PRESS FREEDOM REPORT FOR SOUTH ASIA 2013-14 THE CAMPAIGN FOR JUSTICE: PRESS FREEDOM IN SOUTH ASIA 2013-14 CONTENTS THE CAMPAIGN FOR JUSTICE: PRESS FREEDOM IN SOUTH ASIA 2013-14 1. Foreword 3 Editor : Laxmi Murthy Special thanks to: 2. Overview 5 Adeel Raza Adnan Rehmat 3. South Asia’s Reign of Impunity 10 Angus Macdonald Bhupen Singh Geeta Seshu 4. Women in Journalism: Rights and Wrongs 14 Geetartha Pathak Jane Worthington 5. Afghanistan: Surviving the Killing Fields 20 Jennifer O’Brien Khairuzzaman Kamal Khpolwak Sapai 6. Bangladesh: Pressing for Accountability 24 Kinley Tshering Parul Sharma 7. Bhutan: Media at the Crossroads 30 Pradip Phanjoubam S.K. Pande Sabina Inderjit 8. India: Wage Board Victory amid Rising Insecurity 34 Saleem Samad Shiva Gaunle 9. The Maldives: The Downward Slide 45 Sujata Madhok Sukumar Muralidharan Sunanda Deshapriya 10. Nepal: Calm after the Storm 49 Sunil Jeyasekara Suvojit Bagchi 11. Pakistan: A Rollercoaster Year 55 Ujjwal Acharya Designed by: Impulsive Creations 12. Sri Lanka: Breakdown of Accountability 66 Images: Photographs are contributed by IFJ Affiliates. Special thanks to AP, AFP, Getty Images 13. Annexure: List of Media Rights Violations, May 2013 to April 2014 76 and The Hindu for their support in contributing images. Images are also accessed under a CreativeCommons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence. Cover Photo: Past students of the Sri Lanka College of Journalism hold a candlelight vigil at Victoria Park, Colombo, on the International Day May 2014 to End Impunity on November 23, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aftermath of Charlie Hebdo
    THE READER A publication of the McCandlish Phillips Journalism Institute The Aftermath of Paul Marshall Charlie Hebdo: Blasphemy, Free Speech and Freedom of Religion A talk by Paul Marshall at The King’s College in 2015 My thanks to The King’s College for having But one of the first points I want to make is me here and to the audience for coming to these particular instances are markedly atypical this presentation. The massacre of cartoonists of accusations of blasphemy or insulting Islam at Charlie Hebdo was exactly four weeks ago worldwide. In a book which Professor Glader Paul Marshall is the Wilson Distinguished today. We may add to that that last Saturday mentioned, Silenced, we surveyed accusations Professor of Religious Freedom and research in Denmark there was the attempted murder — sometimes by the government but more Professor in Political Science at Baylor of Lars Vilks, a Swedish cartoonist who did often by private parties — of insulting Islam University, Senior Fellow at the Hudson the famous Mohammad as a roundabout dog or blasphemy in some 26 Muslim majority Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, cartoon in 2008. These things are happening countries and in about 14 western countries. Senior Fellow at the Leimena Institute, more and more. We cover thousands of cases involving millions Jakarta, and Visiting Professor at the What I want to do is put these things in a of people. This is a worldwide phenomena. The Christian University of Indonesia. He is the author and editor of more than 20 books on larger context, a global context.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Better Mousetrap
    ISN_FINAL (DO NOT DELETE) 10/24/2013 6:04 PM SUPER-INTERMEDIARIES, CODE, HUMAN RIGHTS IRA STEVEN NATHENSON* Abstract We live in an age of intermediated network communications. Although the internet includes many intermediaries, some stand heads and shoulders above the rest. This article examines some of the responsibilities of “Super-Intermediaries” such as YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, intermediaries that have tremendous power over their users’ human rights. After considering the controversy arising from the incendiary YouTube video Innocence of Muslims, the article suggests that Super-Intermediaries face a difficult and likely impossible mission of fully servicing the broad tapestry of human rights contained in the International Bill of Human Rights. The article further considers how intermediary content-control pro- cedures focus too heavily on intellectual property, and are poorly suited to balancing the broader and often-conflicting set of values embodied in human rights law. Finally, the article examines a num- ber of steps that Super-Intermediaries might take to resolve difficult content problems and ultimately suggests that intermediaries sub- scribe to a set of process-based guiding principles—a form of Digital Due Process—so that intermediaries can better foster human dignity. * Associate Professor of Law, St. Thomas University School of Law, inathen- [email protected]. I would like to thank the editors of the Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, particularly Amber Bounelis and Tina Marie Trunzo Lute, as well as symposium editor Lauren Smith. Additional thanks are due to Daniel Joyce and Molly Land for their comments at the symposium. This article also benefitted greatly from suggestions made by the participants of the 2013 Third Annual Internet Works-in-Progress conference, including Derek Bambauer, Marc Blitz, Anupam Chander, Chloe Georas, Andrew Gilden, Eric Goldman, Dan Hunter, Fred von Lohmann, Mark Lemley, Rebecca Tushnet, and Peter Yu.
    [Show full text]
  • Flynn V. Nakoula, Docket No
    OfflWtf 1 M. Cris Armenta (SBN 177403) THE ARMENTA LAW FIRM APC 2 11900 W. Olympic Boulevard, Suite 730 Los Angeles, CA 90064 3 Tel: (310) 826-2826x108 Facsimile: (310) 826-5456 4 Email: [email protected] 5 Credence E. Sol (SBN 219784) C/O THE ARMENTA LAW FIRM APC 6 11900 W. Olympic Boulevard, Suite 730 r Los Angeles, CA 90064 n 7 Tel: (310) 826-2826x108 Facsimile: (310) 826-5456 8 [email protected] CO o 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gaylord Flynn 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 GAYLORD FLYNN, an individual, V14-01901Mmm( &) 13 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR: 14 vs. 1. Direct Infringement of 15 Copyright NAKOULA BASSELEY NAKOULA, Secondary Infringement of 16 an individual also known as SAM Copyright BACILE, MARK BASSELEY 3. Fraud 17 YOUSSEF, ABANOB BASSELEY 4. Unfair Business Practices NAKOULA, MATTHEW NEKOLA, 5. Libel 18 AHMED HAMDY, AMAL NADA, 6. Intentional Infliction of DANIEL K. CARESMAN, KRITBAG Emotional Distress 19 DIFRAT, SOBHI BUSHRA, ROBERT BACILY, NICOLA BACILY, THOMAS [Demand For Jury Trial] 20 J. TANAS, ERWIN SALAMEH, YOUSSEFF M. BASSELEY, and/or 21 MALID AHLAWI; GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 22 through 10, inclusive. 23 Defendants. 24 25 > o 0 CT> m o- I27 -a (-"•• 28 JUn A=r COMPLAIN! ^o ro c Mo o o ja». c 3. M»4 1 Plaintiff Gaylord Flynn ("Flynn"), by and through his counsel, on personal knowledge as 2 to his own actions and information and belief as to the actions, capabilities and motivation of 3 others, hereby alleges as follows: 4 NATURE OF CASE 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Innocence of Muslims
    Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization (JITC) Volume 10, Issue 1, Spring 2020 pISSN: 2075-0943, eISSN: 2520-0313 Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc Issue DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.101 Homepage: https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/JITC Journal QR Code: The “Innocence of Muslims” in the US Media: An Indexing Partners Article: Analysis of the Media Discourses on Islam and Muslims Zafar Iqbal Author(s): Fazal Rahim Khan Haseeb ur Rehman Published: Spring 2020 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.101.06 QR Code: Iqbal, Zafar, Fazal Rahim Khan, and Haseeb ur Rehman. “The “Innocence of Muslims” in the US media: An To cite this analysis of the media discourses on Islam and article: Muslims.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 10, no. 1 (2020): 107–135. Crossref This article is open access and is distributed under the Copyright terms of Creative Commons Attribution – Share Alike Information: For more 4.0 International License please click Department of Islamic Thought and Civilization, School Publisher of Social Science and Humanities, University of here Information: Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan. The “Innocence of Muslims” in the US Media: An Analysis of the Media Discourses on Islam and Muslims Dr. Zafar Iqbal Media Studies, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan Dr. Fazal Rahim Khan Social Sciences Foundation University Rawalpindi Campus, Rawalpindi, Pakistan Dr. Haseeb ur Rehman* Arts and Media, Foundation University Rawalpindi Campus, Rawalpindi, Pakistan Abstract The release of trailer of ‘Innocence of Muslims’ generated a huge debate on free speech, hate speech and the representation of the Muslims and Islam in the Western media.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Case: 12-57302, 05/18/2015, ID: 9540269, DktEntry: 196, Page 1 of 12 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CINDY LEE GARCIA, No. 12-57302 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cv-08315-MWF- VBK GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees, AMENDED ORDER and NAKOULA BASSELEY NAKOULA, an individual, AKA Sam Bacile; et al., Defendants. Filed May 18, 2015 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge Order by Chief Judge Thomas; Dissent by Judge Reinhardt Case: 12-57302, 05/18/2015, ID: 9540269, DktEntry: 196, Page 2 of 12 2 GARCIA V. GOOGLE SUMMARY* Copyright / Preliminary Injunction Chief Judge Thomas issued an amended order denying rehearing en banc of the three-judge panel’s order directing Google and YouTube to remove immediately all or part of the film Innocence of Muslims from their platforms and to prevent further uploads. Dissenting from the initial denial of emergency rehearing en banc of the three-judge panel’s order, Judge Reinhardt wrote that this was a case in which the court not only tolerated the infringement of fundamental First Amendment rights but also was the architect of that infringement. He wrote that although he agreed with the en banc court’s majority opinion, immediate en banc consideration would have been the only way of preventing the irreparable damage to free speech rights caused by the three-judge panel’s order in the period before the case could be taken en banc under the court’s regular procedure. ORDER As noted in the order filed March 14, 2014, a judge of this Court made a sua sponte request for a vote on whether to rehear en banc the panel’s order of February 28, 2014 denying an emergency stay of the panel’s prior orders, as amended, directing Google and YouTube to remove * This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Farrukh Iqbal's
    June - September 2017 Issue 23 BUILDING BRIDGES STRENGTHENING ALLIANCES June - September 2017 Dean's Message 3 BBSYDP Certificate Distribution Ceremony 16 Message from Huma Baqai 4 IRC Updates 17 IBA signs MOU with Shanghai University 5 Cover Story: Feature on Mian Abdullah Library 18 Alumni Reunion at Aiwan-e-Sadr Islamabad 6 CED News 21 Dr. Farrukh’s Remarks at the Launch of CEIF News Annual Status of Education Report 7 23 Orientation Sessions Fall 2017 8 IBA CEE signs an MOU with SRB 26 Welcome to IBA 9 Students Achievements & Social Work 27 Session on Law & Order by DG Rangers 9 CEJ News 28 Alumni Reunion at Pearl Continental Lahore 10 CDC News 30 Laptop Distribution Ceremony at the 3rd IBA Staff Cricket Tournament 31 Governor House 11 FYP Exhibition 2017 32 Jang Forum: US Arab Summit 12 Another IBA Alumnus Takes Over Microsoft Independence Day 13 33 QEC, IBA Hosts QAA, HEC 14 Safe Charity Awareness Campaign 33 Study Tour to Europe 14 Sports Activities for THP Students 34 Orientation IBA Talent Hunt Programs 2017 15 Inauguration of Reel Artwork by Tabinda Chinoy 35 Contents Dean & Director Dr. Farrukh Iqbal’s Dear Readers, The Institute has links with many educational organizations, both foreign and domestic. This should not be surprising. After all, we were founded sixty-two years ago in an act of what one might call foreign academic investment, when first the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and then the University of Southern California contributed faculty members to set up and run the Institute. Since then we have maintained an attitude of openness towards learning from other institutions in our lines of business.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 1 Winter 2016 The eT rrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner Recommended Citation Daniel Ortner, The Terrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y. 1 (2016). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol12/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2016 by Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Vol. 12, Issue 1 (2016) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy The Terrorist’s Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner1 I. INTRODUCTION On Wednesday, January 7, 2015, armed gunmen entered the offices of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and killed employees and editors of the magazine in probable retaliation for the publication of satirical cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad.2 The attack on Charlie Hebdo has contributed to the debate over whether publication of speech that is likely to provoke violent reactions from religious extremists should be permissible.3 Some have argued that such speech should be prohibited in order to prevent responsive violence and terrorism.4 Recently, a school of journalism dean argued in USA Today that the publication of cartoons that insult the Prophet Muhammad 1 Daniel Ortner, J.D.
    [Show full text]