Diptera: Tachinidae: Exoristinae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Two tribes hidden in one genus: the case of Agaedioxenis Villeneuve (Diptera: Tachinidae: Exoristinae) Pierfilippo Cerretti, James E. O’Hara, Isaac S. Winkler, Giuseppe Lo Giudice & John O. Stireman Organisms Diversity & Evolution ISSN 1439-6092 Org Divers Evol DOI 10.1007/s13127-015-0211-0 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Org Divers Evol DOI 10.1007/s13127-015-0211-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Two tribes hidden in one genus: the case of Agaedioxenis Villeneuve (Diptera: Tachinidae: Exoristinae) Pierfilippo Cerretti1,2 & James E. O’Hara3 & Isaac S. Winkler4 & Giuseppe Lo Giudice2 & John O. Stireman III4 Received: 18 December 2014 /Accepted: 9 March 2015 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2015 Abstract The Afrotropical tachinid “genus” Agaedioxenis two names. Eugaedioxenis gen. nov. is recognized based on Villeneuve is taken here as an example of the challenges faced two species, Eugaedioxenis haematodes (Villeneuve), type by dipterists in classifying one of the most diverse and species species and comb. nov., and Eugaedioxenis horridus sp. rich families of organisms on Earth. Our study has revealed nov. All new species of both genera are described from South “two tribes hidden in one genus”, with one lineage Africa. We further discuss how genetics, morphology, and representing a genus belonging to the tribe Goniini natural history have contributed to revise the generic circum- (Agaedioxenis) and the other representing a genus belonging scription of Agaedioxenis, bringing about both the description to Eryciini (Eugaedioxenis gen. nov.). The two genera have of Eugaedioxenis and the revision of the suprageneric classi- been revised through an integrative approach of morphology fication for these two taxa. and genetics (COI barcode sequences). The genus name Agaedioxenis replaces that of Gaedioxenis Townsend as a Keywords Diversity . DNA barcode . Genetic distance . New valid genus name. Agaedioxenis is recognized from five spe- genus . New species . Parasitoids . Systematics . Taxonomic cies consisting of two previously described species revision . Afrotropical Region (Agaedioxenis setifrons (Villeneuve) and Agaedioxenis brevicornis (Villeneuve) both comb. nov.) and three new spe- cies (Agaedioxenis kirkspriggsi sp. nov., Agaedioxenis Introduction succulentus sp. nov., and Agaedioxenis timidus sp. nov.). Agaedioxenis propinqua (Villeneuve) is recognized as a sub- An international effort is currently underway to prepare and jective synonym of A. brevicornis (Villeneuve), syn. nov., and publish the first Manual of Afrotropical Diptera (Kirk-Spriggs by First Reviser action, the latter is chosen as the senior of the et al., http://afrotropicalmanual.org/index.html). A chapter will be devoted to each of the 108 families of flies known This work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/ from the region, and an illustrated key to the genera of each urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0C53D317-5C05-45D7-A9E4- ’ FB6E6D6F28DE family will be an intregral part of each family schapter.For parasitic flies of the family Tachinidae, there are several * Pierfilippo Cerretti challenges associated with preparing a key to genera. First, [email protected] there are significantly more genera of Tachinidae in the region than there are genera of any other family of Diptera 1 (229 at last count, O’Hara 2014). Second, the classification of DAFNAE-Entomology, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy Afrotropical Tachinidae has received little attention since the catalogue and keys of Crosskey (1980, 1984). Third, even the 2 Department of Biology and Biotechnology ‘Charles Darwin’, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, Piazzale A. Moro 5, classification of 30 years ago was, for practical reasons, 00185 Rome, Italy seriously flawed phylogenetically for certain tribes of the 3 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Agriculture and Agri-Food Exoristinae (then known as the Goniinae). Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada Crosskey (1984: 202) was aware that the “externally visi- 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, ble adult morphology in Tachinidae frequently does not cor- Dayton, OH 45435, USA relate very precisely with phyletic grouping”.Thiswas Author's personal copy P. Cerretti et al. particularly evident in the so-called Goniini-Carceliini- (Eugaedioxenis gen. nov.). The two genera are revised below, Sturmiini-Eryciini complex that Crosskey first discussed in including the description of three new species of his Australian conspectus (Crosskey 1973). Crosskey was fa- Agaedioxenis, the reassignment of Gaedioxenis haematodes miliar with the studies of the female reproductive system by Villeneuve to Eugaedioxenis (comb. nov.), and the description Herting (1957, 1960) that revealed a lineage within this com- of one new species of the latter genus. plex characterized by the production of a derived type of egg (termed “microtype”). He understood that a phylogenetic clas- sification should take this into account, but noted that “it is Materials and methods impossible to adopt such a system as yet for the Australian fauna, in which the reproductive habit of most of the genera Specimens remains unstudied” (Crosskey 1973: 77). Crosskey (1973) thus followed a more traditional classificatory scheme that Male terminalia were dissected and prepared for examination emphasized adult morphology and recognized four tribes in following the methods described by O’Hara (2002). After the complex: Carceliini, Eryciini, Goniini, and Sturmiini. examination, the terminalia were rehydrated and preserved Shortly thereafter, Mesnil (1975) formalized the results of in glycerol in a plastic microvial pinned below the specimen. Herting’s discoveries of the female reproductive system into Composite focus-stacking images were produced from multi- a two-tribe system—the Goniini with microtype eggs and the ple images captured using a Nikon DS-L1 digital camera Eryciini with macrotype eggs—but Crosskey (1976) main- (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on a Leica MZ12.5 (Leica, tained his four tribes for his Oriental conspectus and later for Wetzlar, Germany) stereomicroscope (habitus, head, wing, his Afrotropical catalogue and keys (Crosskey 1980, 1984). abdomen) or on a Leica DMLS (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) An international team was formed in 2012 to investigate compound microscope, and processed with CombineZM 1.0 the phylogeny of the Tachinidae using morphological and (http://combinezm.software.informer.com/). Environmental molecular data (Stireman et al. 2013). It is anticipated that this scanning electron microscope (ESEM) digital images were study will result in a well-supported phylogeny that will aid in taken with a Hitachi TM1000 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). the development of a world classification of the family to Label data of primary types are given verbatim using the replace the current regional classifications. This study, coin- following symbols: ciding as it does with the Manual of Afrotropical Diptera project, has brought the Afrotropical Tachinidae under special / End of a line and beginning of the next scrutiny. We are endeavoring to modernize the supra-specific // End of a label and beginning of the next (from top to classification for the 1000-odd species, including reassigning bottom on the same pin) thegeneraofCrosskey’s “Goniini-Carceliini-Sturmiini- Eryciini complex” along phylogenetic lines. Repositories of specimens are given in square brackets The “genus” Agaedioxenis Villeneuve is a prime example using the following acronyms: of the challenges faced by tachinidologists in classifying tach- BMNH Natural History Museum [formerly British inids in general and resolving the Goniini-Carceliini- Museum (Natural History)], London, UK Sturmiini-Eryciini complex in particular. Villeneuve (1937) CNC Canadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, erected the genus, under the name Gaedioxenis,fortwonew Canada species and later (Villeneuve 1939) added two more new JOSC J.O. Stireman collection at Wright State University, species and placed one of them in a new subgenus, Dayton, Ohio, USA Agaedioxenis. Crosskey (1980) followed this classification MZUR Zoological Museum, ‘Sapienza’ University of and assigned the genus to the Eryciini. Crosskey (1984)keyed Rome, Rome, Italy out the species of Gaedioxenis in two places in his key to NMDA Department of Arthropoda, Natal Museum, Afrotropical eryciines, retaining the four species in one genus Pietermaritzburg, South Africa but noting that a revision was needed. Our study of NMB National Museum, Bloemfontein, South Africa Gaedioxenis sensu Villeneuve and Crosskey has revealed two problems, one nomenclatural and the other phylogenetic. We review the nomenclatural history of the genus name and Terminology