DOCSLIB.ORG

Stasi Brainwashing in the GDR 1957 - 1990

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stasi Brainwashing in the GDR 1957 - 1990 University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Fall 12-20-2017 Stasi Brainwashing in the GDR 1957 - 1990 Jacob H. Solbrig Jacob H. Solbrig, [email protected] Jacob Hagen Solbrig Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td University of New Orleans, New Orleans, [email protected] Part of the Applied Ethics Commons, Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Continental Philosophy Commons, Cultural History Commons, Eastern European Studies Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, European History Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Modern Literature Commons, Multicultural Psychology Commons, Oral History Commons, Other German Language and Literature Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Political History Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Psychiatry Commons, Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy Commons, Psychological Phenomena and Processes Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Social History Commons, Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons, Theory and Criticism Commons, and the Theory and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Solbrig, Jacob H. and Solbrig, Jacob Hagen, "Stasi Brainwashing in the GDR 1957 - 1990" (2017). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 2431. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2431 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stasi Brainwashing in the GDR 1957 - 1990 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History by Jacob H. Solbrig B.A. Louisiana State University, 2007 December 2017 Acknowledgements The author acknowledges the contributions of former East Germans and their valuable experiences without which this research could not have been possible. He thanks Dr. Siegmar Faust and Dr.Frank Eigenfeld for their vital contributions to the work. He is grateful to the graduate committee: Dr. Gunter Bischof, Dr. Robert Dupont, and Dr. Marc Landry for their advice and mentorship. He wishes to acknowledge also the editing aid of his mother, Dr. Wendy J. Hajjar, and partner in life Rachel Calix RN. ii Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Stasi Brainwashing in the GDR 1957 - 1990 ...................................................................................5 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................................37 Appendix I .....................................................................................................................................40 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................41 Vita .................................................................................................................................................45 iii Abstract This thesis examines the methods used by the Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), more commonly known as the Stasi, or East German secret police, for extraction of information from citizens of the German Democratic Republic for the purpose of espionage and covert operations inside East Germany, as it pertains to the deliberate brainwashing of East German citizens. As one of the most efficient intelligence agencies to ever exist, the Stasi’s main purpose was to monitor the population, gather intelligence, and collect or turn informants. The scope and breadth of the techniques and data compiled for use by the Stasi were exhaustive, and the repercussions of their use are still being felt and discovered twenty-five years after the fall of the Berlin Wall. This study aims to show the lasting effects brainwashing had on former informants and the Stasi’s victims. Keywords: cold war, European history iv Introduction The Staatssicherheit, or Stasi, were the state security police force for East Germany. Described as the most effective and oppressive intelligence agency that has ever existed, its motto was “the Shield and Sword of the Party” referring to the communist Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands, (SED). It lasted from February, 1950 to January, 1990 and employed over 274,000 people, lasting for 40 years. The Stasi brainwashed citizens of the German Democratic Republic to collect incriminating information and to act as spies for the SED. Ultimately the Stasi packaged these deeds to the public as a patriotic duty for the greater good—but it was anything but patriotic. In many cases the relationships between Stasi agents and their informers blurred the line, with agents posing as friends and colleagues and even lovers.1 The Stasi carried out Government Sanctioned observation on the people of the GDR for over 30 years with the intention of discouraging dissent amongst the population, manipulating, and ultimately controlling the minds of its citizens. In an elaborate scheme of information collection and archiving, Stasi officials fed fragments of data back to the State Security Ministry. Using the most contemporary evidence available in English, the data reported here points to the fact that brainwashing had lasting effects still felt by Germans today. Tensions ran high between the East and the West early in the 20th century, dating back to the period after World War I when major world powers began to redraw sovereign borders. The Berlin Wall became the Cold War line dividing Germany physically and ideologically, and spies increasingly played an important role for the East German government. Stasi members were instructed to use coercion methods learned from their Russian counterparts; since the 1950s they 1 Barbra Miller, Narratives of Guilt and Compliance in Unified Germany: Stasi Informers and their Impact on Society (New York: Routledge, 2002), 60-62. 1 had been adapting many of their strategies.2 Fearing the outbreak of another war, hard liners pushed to keep operations in East Germany as covert as possible, retreating into a Cold War stance favored by the Kremlin, which had long sanctioned covert operations when dealing with the West.3 During the Korean War (1950-1953) American soldiers were captured by the Chinese and subjected to various methods of coercive indoctrination which helped to explain why they defected from the United States. After being interviewed upon their return to the United States, it was discovered that they had been victims of experimental psychological techniques. They had been brainwashed. John Frankenheimer’s (1962) film The Manchurian Candidate, and Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon (1940), depict such brainwashing techniques.4 The portrayal of Rubashov’s recollections during Stalin’s purges indicates the extent to which he was steeped in Communist indoctrination. This illustrates that the Soviets were experimenting with such techniques before World War II to try to control the words and ideas of their captives as well. This is the first time that the expression used to describe the concept of thought reform we have come to know as “brainwashing” in the West.5 The term brainwashing has many permutations. Among them are “coercive indoctrination,” “thought reform,” “menticide,” “psychological warfare,” or “brain warfare,” and “programming,” to name just a few. Scholars use them interchangeably to describe the same phenomena of techniques developed to control a victim’s actions or reactions.6 For the purposes 2 Oleg Kalugin, Spymaster: My 32 Years in Intelligence and Espionage Against the West (New York: St. Martin Press, 1994), 10. 3 Ibid. 4 The Manchurian Candidate, Directed by: John Frankenheimer. New York: MGM, 1962, VOD. 5 Susan Carruthers, Cold War Captives: Imprisonment, Escape, and Brainwashing (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009), 174-175. 6 Robert Lifton, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of 'Brainwashing' in China (Chapel Hill: UNC Press Books, 1989), 4-6. 2 of this paper the author uses the term Brainwashing to describe all tactics used by the Stasi for mass manipulation. By controlling the information they were given, East German people were subject to the will of their Stasi oppressors. Consequently, life in East Germany became like living in an elaborate correctional facility. It was no secret that the Kremlin wanted to remake East Germany as the model of a socialist utopia. When
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Brezhnev Era (1964–1982)
    Name _______________________________________________ Date _____________ The Brezhnev Era (1964–1982) Next to Stalin, Leonid Brezhnev ruled the Soviet Union longer than any other leader. Brezhnev and his supporters stressed the ties with the Stalinist era by focusing on his good points and ignoring his crimes. 1. What is the KGB? Brezhnev strengthened the Soviet bureaucracy as well What was its as the KGB (Committee of State Security)—formed in purpose? (list 2) 1954; its mission was to defend the Soviet government from its enemies at home and abroad. The KGB suppressed dissidents who spoke out against the government at home and in the satellite countries. The Soviets also invested in a large military buildup and were determined to never again suffer a humiliating defeat, as happened in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Yet Brezhnev proceeded cautiously in the mid-1960s and sought to avoid confrontation with the West. He was determined, however, to protect Soviet interests. Brezhnev Doctrine (1968) 2. What was the Prague In 1968, Alexander Dubček (1921–1992) became head of the Czechoslovakia Spring? Communist Party and began a series of reforms known as the Prague Spring reforms, which sought to make communism more humanistic. He lifted censorship, permitted non-communists to form political groups, and wanted to trade with the West, but still remain true to communist ideals. Brezhnev viewed these reforms as a capitalistic threat to the socialist ideologies of communism and, in August of 1968, sent over 500,000 Soviet and Eastern European troops 3. How did Brezhnev to occupy Czechoslovakia. In the Brezhnev Doctrine, he defended the Soviet react to the Prague military invasion of Czechoslovakia, saying in effect, that antisocialist elements Spring? in a single socialist country can compromise the entire socialist system, and thus other socialist countries have the right to intervene militarily if they see the need to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents of Contemporary Art: TIME Edited by Amelia Groom, the Introduction Gives an Overview of Selected Writings Addressing Time in Relation to Art
    “It is important to realize that the appointment that is in question in contemporariness does not simply take place in chronological time; it is something that, working within chronological time, urges, presses and transforms it. And this urgency is the untimeliness, the anachronism that permits us to grasp our time in the form of a ‘too soon’ that is also a ‘too late’; of an ‘already’ that is also a ‘not yet.’ Moreover, it allows us to recognize in the obscurity of the present the light that, without ever being able to reach us, is perpetually voyaging towards us.” - Giorgio Agamben 2009 What is the Contemporary? FORWARD ELAINE THAP Time is of the essence. Actions speak louder than words. The throughline of the following artists is that they all have an immediacy and desire to express and challenge the flaws of the Present. In 2008, all over the world were uprisings that questions government and Capitalist infrastructure. Milan Kohout attempted to sell nooses for homeowners and buyers in front of the Bank of America headquarters in Boston. Ernesto Pujol collaborated and socially choreographed artists in Tel Aviv protesting the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. Indonesian artist, Arahmaiani toured the world to share “HIS Story,” performances creating problematic imagery ending to ultimately writing on her body to shine a spotlight on the effects of patriarchy and the submission of women. All of these artists confront terrorism from all parts of the world and choose live action to reproduce memory and healing. Social responsibility is to understand an action, account for the reaction, and to place oneself in the bigger picture.
    [Show full text]
  • New Books | January–June 2014 Highlights
    ONEWORLD NEW BOOKS | JANUARY–jUNE 2014 HIGHLIGHTS FICTION | 8 FICTION | 11 FICTION | 18 HISTORY | 28 POLITICS | 32 SCIENCE | 40 PSYCHOLOGY | 46 LITERATURE | 54 GIFT | 56 CONTENTS CONTENTS FICTION New 2 New in Paperback 18 NON-FICTION History 22 Philosophy 31 Politics & Current Affairs 32 Business 38 Science 40 Psychology 46 Literature 54 Gift 56 Religion 58 BEGINNER’S GUIDES New 59 Complete List 62 DISTRIBUTORS & REPRESENTATIVES 64 Beads of water sparkled on their brown backs. Even from behind her sunglasses, Janet’s eyes winced at the brightness of their silvery-brown skin. Then her eyes were drawn to the wobbling water that lassoed the sun into strange rings and coils. And there, beneath it all, was the crack. For a moment, she thought that there was no crack. Surely if there were a crack, the water level would have dipped. Surely, she would have noticed if the water level had dipped. Or Solomon would have said something about the water level dropping. Nothing had been said or noticed. Until now. She stood there. Her three little silver darlings shivered in the heat and murmured to one side. She slid her sunglasses onto the top of her head. She stood over the pool, leaning out as far as she dared. Still the water looped and coiled the glinting light. It would take time for the waves to settle. But she had time. Of that commodity she had an abundance. Always that sense of time on her hands. As though time were some sticky substance that clung to her fingers and had to be carefully scoured off.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years After the Iron Curtain: the Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010
    Twenty Years after the Iron Curtain: The Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010 Assistant Professor at Masaryk University in the Czech Republic n November of last year, the Czech Republic commemorated the fall of the communist regime in I Czechoslovakia, which occurred twenty years prior.1 The twentieth anniversary invites thoughts, many times troubling, on how far the Czechs have advanced on their path from a totalitarian regime to a pluralistic democracy. This lecture summarizes and evaluates the process of democratization of the Czech Republic’s political institutions, its transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market economy, and the transformation of its civil society. Although the political and economic transitions have been largely accomplished, democratization of Czech civil society is a road yet to be successfully traveled. This lecture primarily focuses on why this transformation from a closed to a truly open and autonomous civil society unburdened with the communist past has failed, been incomplete, or faced numerous roadblocks. HISTORY The Czech Republic was formerly the Czechoslovak Republic. It was established in 1918 thanks to U.S. President Woodrow Wilson and his strong advocacy for the self-determination of new nations coming out of the Austro-Hungarian Empire after the World War I. Although Czechoslovakia was based on the concept of Czech nationhood, the new nation-state of fifteen-million people was actually multi- ethnic, consisting of people from the Czech lands (Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia), Slovakia, Subcarpathian Ruthenia (today’s Ukraine), and approximately three million ethnic Germans. Since especially the Sudeten Germans did not join Czechoslovakia by means of self-determination, the nation- state endorsed the policy of cultural pluralism, granting recognition to the various ethnicities present on its soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Differently Drawn Boundaries of the Permissible in German And
    67 Differently Drawn Boundaries of the Permissible in German and Australian Literary Journalism by Beate Josephi, Edith Cowan University, Australia Christine Müller, University of Applied Science, Germany Australian author Anna Funder’s Stasiland serves as a useful study for exploring the differences between German and Australian notions of literary journalism when it comes to claims of verifiability and authenticity. ustralian author Anna Funder’s book Stasiland, which deals with life in Athe former East Germany, is based on a series of interviews. It has been described as “a fresh and highly original close-up of what happens to people in the corrosive atmosphere of a totalitarian state.”1 Stasiland, which came out in 2002, tells the story of ordinary citizens who got caught up in the web of East Germany’s state security [Staatssicherheit or “Stasi”]. Yet, it is more than a history about the Stasi. It is a personal exploration of the reality of psychological terror that, as far as Anna Funder was concerned, had not yet been sufficiently told.2 Stasiland was shortlisted for numerous prizes in Australia and also “received rave notices”3 in Britain, where it won the BBC Four Samuel Johnson Prize in 2004, a substantial award which carries a prize money of £30,000. The prize is an award for nonfiction only, and Stasiland was commended for stretching the boundaries of nonfiction writing.4 The Sunday Times, to quote from the book’s back cover, called it “a masterpiece of investigative analysis, written almost like a novel, with a perfect mix of compassion and distance.”5 It was, then, book-length journalism with a literary ambition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of the Berlin Wall Erin Honseler, Halie Mitchell, Max Schuetze, Callie Wheeler March 10, 2009
    Group 8 Final Project 1 The Beginning of the Berlin Wall Erin Honseler, Halie Mitchell, Max Schuetze, Callie Wheeler March 10, 2009 For twenty-eight years an “iron curtain” divided East and West Berlin in the heart of Germany. Many events prior to the actual construction of the Wall caused East Germany’s leader Erich Honecker to demand the Wall be built. Once the Wall was built the cultural gap between East Germany and West Germany broadened. During the time the Wall stood many people attempted to cross the border illegally without much success. This caused a very unstable relationship between the government of the West (Federal Republic of Germany) and the government of the East (German Democratic Republic). In this paper we will discuss events leading up to the construction of the Berlin Wall, the government that was responsible for the construction of the Wall, how it divided Germany, and how some people tried to escape from the East to the West. Why the Berlin Wall Was Built In order to understand why the Berlin Wall was built, we must first look at the events leading up to the actual construction of the Wall in 1961. In the Aftermath of World War II Germany was split up into four different zones; each zone was controlled by a different country. The western half was split into three different sectors: the British sector, the American sector and the French sector. The Eastern half was controlled by the Soviet Union. Eventually, the three western occupiers unified their three zones and became what is known as the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG).
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989
    FORUM The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989 ✣ Commentaries by Michael Kraus, Anna M. Cienciala, Margaret K. Gnoinska, Douglas Selvage, Molly Pucci, Erik Kulavig, Constantine Pleshakov, and A. Ross Johnson Reply by Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana, eds. Imposing, Maintaining, and Tearing Open the Iron Curtain: The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014. 563 pp. $133.00 hardcover, $54.99 softcover, $54.99 e-book. EDITOR’S NOTE: In late 2013 the publisher Lexington Books, a division of Rowman & Littlefield, put out the book Imposing, Maintaining, and Tearing Open the Iron Curtain: The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989, edited by Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana. The book consists of twenty-four essays by leading scholars who survey the Cold War in East-Central Europe from beginning to end. East-Central Europe was where the Cold War began in the mid-1940s, and it was also where the Cold War ended in 1989–1990. Hence, even though research on the Cold War and its effects in other parts of the world—East Asia, South Asia, Latin America, Africa—has been extremely interesting and valuable, a better understanding of events in Europe is essential to understand why the Cold War began, why it lasted so long, and how it came to an end. A good deal of high-quality scholarship on the Cold War in East-Central Europe has existed for many years, and the literature on this topic has bur- geoned in the post-Cold War period.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is an Electronic Reprint of the Original Article. This Reprint May Differ from the Original in Pagination and Typographic Detail
    This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. 'Boycott the Nazi Flag' Weiss, Holger Published in: Anti-fascism in the Nordic Countries DOI: 10.4324/9781315171210 Published: 30/01/2019 Document Version (Peer reviewed version when applicable) Document License Publisher rights policy Link to publication Please cite the original version: Weiss, H. (2019). 'Boycott the Nazi Flag': The anti-fascism of the International of Seamen and Harbour Workers. In K. Braskén, N. Copsey, & J. A. Lundin (Eds.), Anti-fascism in the Nordic Countries: New Perspectives, Comparisons and Transnational Connections (pp. 124–142). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315171210 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This document is downloaded from the Research Information Portal of ÅAU: 29. Sep. 2021 “Boycott the Nazi Flag”: the antifascism of the International of Seamen and Harbour Workers This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge/CRC Press in Anti-Fascism in the Nordic Countries: New Perspectives, Comparisons and Transnational Connections [2019], available online: http://www.routledge.com/[https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315171210] Holger Weiss, Åbo Akademi University Introduction This chapter discusses the antifascist campaigns orchestrated by the International of Seamen and Harbour Workers (ISH) in Northern Europe during the first half of the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainwashing As a Strategy for Building Uniformity Reflected in Lois Lowry’S the Giver Novel (1993) Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
    BRAINWASHING AS A STRATEGY FOR BUILDING UNIFORMITY REFLECTED IN LOIS LOWRY’S THE GIVER NOVEL (1993) MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA PUBLICATION ARTICLE Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education in English Department By: NUR HANDINI YUSNA LAILY A320120130 ENGLISH DEPARTMENT SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA 2016 0 BRAINWASHING AS A SRATEGY FOR BUILDING UNIFORMITY REFLECTED IN LOIS LOWRY’S NOVEL THE GIVER (1993) MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Nur Handini Yusna Laily . A320120130 ABSTRAK BRAINWASHING AS A SRATEGY FOR BUILDING UNIFORMITY REFLECTED IN LOIS LOWRY’S NOVEL THE GIVER (1993) MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Nur Handini Yusna Laily . A320120130 ABSTRAK Penelitian ini menganalisis tentang The Influence of Brainwashing as a Strategy for Building Uniformity The Giver (1993) yang dianalisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiologi. Objektif dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui karakteristik dari brainwashing, untuk mendeskripsikan proses brainwashing dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana Louis Lowry menerapkan brainwashing berdasarkan pendekatan sosiologi. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Data pada primer penelitian ini adalah The Giver by Lois Lowry’s (1993), dan data sekundernya adalah sumber lain yang berhubungan dengan penelitian yang diambil dari buku sastra, kritik sastra, jurnal, dan beberapa artikel yang berhubungan dengan novel. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pertama, terdapat karakterisitik brainwashing dalam novel The Giver yaitu metode reward dan punishment, obat-obatan dan senyawa lainnnya, pendekatan dalam pidato atau presentasi dan pendekatan secara audio (vocal) dan visual. Dalam pemberian reward dan punishment seperti pemberian pekerjaan pada masing-masing anggota dan juga pemberian aturan dalam komunitas. Sedangkan obat-obatan diberikan kepada komunitas setiap hari.
    [Show full text]
  • Honecker's Policy Toward the Federal Republic and West Berlin
    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Helms School of Government Spring 1976 Contrast and Continuity: Honecker’s Policy toward the Federal Republic and West Berlin Stephen R. Bowers Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Bowers, Stephen R., "Contrast and Continuity: Honecker’s Policy toward the Federal Republic and West Berlin" (1976). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 86. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/86 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Helms School of Government at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 308 STEPHEN R. BOWERS 36. Mamatey, pp. 280-286. 37. Ibid., pp. 342-343. CONTRAST AND CONTINUITY: 38. The Letters of Theodore Roosevelt, Volume VIII (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954), p. 1364. 39. Robert Ferrell, 'The United States and East Central Europe Before 1941," in Kertesz, op. cit., p. 22. HONECKER'S POLICY 40. Ibid., p. 24. 41. William R. Caspary, 'The 'Mood Theory': A Study of Public Opinion and Foreign Policy," American Political Science Review LXIV (June, 1970). 42. For discussion on this point see George Kennan, American Diplomacy (New York: Mentor Books, 1951); Walter Lippmann, The Public Philosophy (New York: Mentor Books, TOWARD THE FEDERAL 1955). 43. Gaddis, p. 179. 44. Martin Wei!, "Can the Blacks Do for Africa what the Jews Did for Israel?" Foreign Policy 15 (Summer, 1974), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Gala Dinner Celebrating the 21St Anniversary of the U.S.-China Policy Foundation
    2016 Gala Dinner Celebrating the 21st Anniversary of the U.S.-China Policy Foundation Thursday, November 17, 2016 The Mayflower Hotel Washington, D.C. China in Washington Celebrating the 21st anniversary of the U.S.-China Policy Foundation and recognizing honorees for excellence in public service and U.S.-China relations THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2016 This evening has been made possible by the generous support of our sponsors LEAD SPONSORS Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office The Starr Foundation SPONSORS Micron J.R. Simplot Air China SUPPORTERS Wanxiang America China Daily UPS FedEx China Telecom Alaska Airlines RECEPTION Chinese Room, 6:30 - 7:00 PM DINNER & PROGRAM Grand Ballroom, 7:00 - 9:30 PM THE MAYFLOWER HOTEL 1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Program WELCOME REMARKS The Honorable James Sasser U.S. Ambassador to China (1996-1999) U.S. Senator from Tennessee (1977-1995) DINNER SERVICE AWARDS PRESENTATION LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS Dr. David M. Lampton Professor and Director of China Studies, Johns Hopkins SAIS The Honorable Barbara Hackman Franklin President and CEO, Barbara Franklin Enterprises 29th Secretary of Commerce GLOBAL PEACEMAKER AWARD His Excellency Ban Ki-moon 8th Secretary-General of the United Nations DINNER SPEAKER His Excellency Cui Tiankai Chinese Ambassador to the United States (2013-present) CLOSING REMARKS The Honorable J. Stapleton Roy U.S. Ambassador to China (1991-1995) 2016 Gala Honoree LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT IN U.S.-CHINA EDUCATION Dr. David M. Lampton Professor and Director of China Studies, Johns Hopkins SAIS David M. Lampton is Hyman Professor and Director of China Studies at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, where he also heads SAIS China, the school’s overall presence in greater China.
    [Show full text]