DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Stakeholder Perceptions of Feral Camels: Aboriginal Community Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Key Stakeholder Perceptions of Feral Camels: Aboriginal Community Survey 54 Key stakeholder perceptions P Vaarzon-Morel Report of feral camels: 49 Aboriginal community survey 2008 Key stakeholder perceptions of feral camels: Aboriginal community survey P Vaarzon-Morel 2008 Contributing author information Enquiries should be addressed to: Petronella Vaarzon-Morel: Consulting anthropologist, PO Box 3561, Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia. Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 49 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source. ISBN: 1 74158 096 X (Online copy) ISSN: 1832 6684 Citation Vaarzon-Morel P. 2008. Key stakeholder perceptions of feral camels: Aboriginal community survey. DKCRC Report 49. Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre, Alice Springs. Available at http://www.desertknowledgecrc.com. au/publications/contractresearch.html The Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre is an unincorporated joint venture with 28 partners whose mission is to develop and disseminate an understanding of sustainable living in remote desert environments, deliver enduring regional economies and livelihoods based on Desert Knowledge, and create the networks to market this knowledge in other desert lands. For additional information please contact Desert Knowledge CRC Publications Officer PO Box 3971 Alice Springs NT 0871 Australia Telephone +61 8 8959 6000 Fax +61 8 8959 6048 www.desertknowledgecrc.com.au © Desert Knowledge CRC 2008 The project was funded by Australian Government. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of Desert Knowledge CRC or its participants. II Desert Knowledge CRC Key stakeholder perceptions of feral camels: Aboriginal community survey Contents Tables IV Figures and graphs .......................................................................................................................................................IV List of shortened forms ................................................................................................................................................. V Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................................VI 1. Summary .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 The structure of the report ................................................................................................................................. 7 3. Method ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Selection of survey areas .................................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Characteristics of the survey population ......................................................................................................... 10 3.3 The survey questions ....................................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Survey delivery and sharing of information .................................................................................................... 12 3.5 Selection of interviewees ................................................................................................................................ 12 3.6 Data collection and analysis ............................................................................................................................ 13 3.7 Survey coverage ............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.8 Challenges and limitations ............................................................................................................................. 15 4. Findings ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 The case studies ............................................................................................................................................... 17 5. Discussion of differences in perspectives among and within Aboriginal communities .......................................... 31 5.1 Observations on camel presence ..................................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Perspectives on camel impacts ........................................................................................................................ 33 5.3 Perspectives on camel management ................................................................................................................ 44 5.4 Implications .................................................................................................................................................... 58 6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................... 65 7. Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................... 67 8. References ............................................................................................................................................................... 69 Appendix 1: Wide range survey information ............................................................................................................... 73 1.1 The Western Australian communities .............................................................................................................. 73 1.2 The South Australian communities ................................................................................................................. 85 1.3 The Northern Territory communities............................................................................................................... 96 Appendix 2: Focus questions for survey with local Aboriginal communities............................................................131 Key stakeholder perceptions of feral camels: Aboriginal community survey Desert Knowledge CRC III Tables Table 1: Community survey coverage ......................................................................................................................23 Table 2: Observations of camel presence and perceived population trends by community .....................................39 Table 3: Summary of observations on camel presence and perceived population trends in surveyed communities ................................................................................................................................40 Table 4: Negative impacts on broader landscape values mentioned by people in survey communities ................................................................................................................................................41 Table 5: Number of communities by state/territory where interviewees mentioned negative impacts on broader landscape values ..........................................................................................................42 Table 6: Positive impacts of feral camels mentioned by some interviewees in survey communities ......................48 Table 7: Positive impacts of camels: type of positive impact by number of settlements in each state/territory .......................................................................................................................................51 Table 8: Attitudes to feral camel management in the survey communities ..............................................................57 Table 9: Attitudes to feral camel management by number of communities in each state/territory ..........................58 Table 10: Main sources of information on feral camels and their management by number of communities in each state/territory .............................................................................................................58 Table 11: Perceived need for assistance and support to manage feral camels, noting types of activities suggested .................................................................................................................................65 Figures and graphs Figure 1: Map of Aboriginal communities surveyed ..................................................................................................21 Figure 2: Aboriginal communities’
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Corroboree Moderne
    Corrected draft May 2004 CORROBOREE MODERNE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dressed in a brown wool bodystocking specially made by Jantzen and brown face paint, an American dancer, Beth Dean played the young boy initiate in the ballet CORROBOREE at a Gala performance before Queen Elizabeth 11 and Prince Phillip on Feb 4 1954 . “On stage she seems to exude some of the primitive passion of the savage whose rites she presents” (1a) “If appropriations do have a general character, it is surely that of unstable duality. In some proportion, they always combine taking and acknowledgment, appropriation and homage, a critique of colonial exclusions, and collusion in imbalanced exchange. What the problem demands is therefore not an endorsement or rejection of primitivism in principle, but an exploration of how particular works were motivated and assessed.” (1) CORROBOREE "announced its modernity as loudly as its Australian origins…all around the world" (2) 1: (BE ABORIGINAL !) (3) - DANCE A CORROBOREE! The 1950s in the Northern Territory represents simultaneously the high point of corroboree and its vanishing point. At the very moment one of the most significant cultural exchanges of the decade was registered in Australian Society at large, the term corroboree became increasingly so associated with kitsch and the inauthentic it was erased as a useful descriptor, only to be reclaimed almost fifty years later. Corroboree became the bastard notion par excellence imbued with “in- authenticity.” It was such a popularly known term, that it stood as a generic brand for anything dinky-di Australian. (4) Corroboree came to be read as code for tourist trash culture corrupted by white man influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeoworks Technical Papers 9
    Palaeoworks Technical Papers 9 Geochemistry and identification of Australian red ochre deposits Mike Smith & Barry Fankhauser National Museum of Australia, Canberra, ACT 2601 and Centre for Archaeological Research, Australian National University, ACT 0200, Australia. Email: [email protected] September 2009 Note This information has been prepared for students and researchers interested in identifying ochre in archaeological contexts. It is open to use by everyone with the proviso that its use is cited in any publications, using the URL as the place of publication. Any comments regarding the information found here should be directed to the authors at the above address. © Mike Smith & Barry Fankhauser 2009 Preface Between 1994 and 1998 the authors undertook a project to look at the feasibility of using geochemical signatures to identify the sources of ochres recovered in archaeological excavations. This research was supported by AIATSIS research grants G94/4879, G96/5222 and G98/6143.The two substantive reports on this research (listed below) have remained unpublished until now and are brought together in this Palaeoworks Technical Paper to make them more generally accessible to students and other researchers. Smith, M. A. and B. Fankhauser (1996) An archaeological perspective on the geochemistry of Australian red ochre deposits: Prospects for fingerprinting major sources. A report to the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra. Smith, M. A. and B. Fankhauser (2003) G96/5222 - Further characterisation and sourcing of archaeological ochres. A report to the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra. The original reports are reproduced substantially as written, with the exception that the tables listing samples from ochre quarries (1996: Tables II/ 1-11) have been revised to include additional samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Kimberley Land Council Submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission Inquiry Into the Native Title Act: Issues Paper 45 General Comment
    Kimberley Land Council Submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission Inquiry into the Native Title Act: Issues Paper 45 General comment The Kimberley Land Council (KLC) is the native title representative body for the Kimberley region of Western Australia. The KLC is also a grass roots community organisation which has represented the interests of Kimberley Traditional Owners in their struggle for recognition of ownership of country since 1978. The KLC is cognisant of the limitations of the Native Title Act (NTA) in addressing the wrongs of the past and providing a clear pathway to economic, social and cultural independence for Aboriginal people in the future. The KLC strongly supports the review of the NTA by the Australian Law Reform Commission (Review) in the hope that it might provide an increased capacity for the NTA to address both past wrongs and the future needs and aspirations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The dispossession of country which occurred as a result of colonisation has had a profound and long lasting impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Country (land and sea) is centrally important to the cultural, social and familial lives of Aboriginal people, and its dispossession has had profound and continuing intergenerational effects. However, interests in land (and waters) is also a primary economic asset and its dispossession from Traditional Owners has prevented them from enjoying the benefits of its utilisation for economic purposes, and bestowed those benefits on others (in particular, in the Kimberley, pastoral, mining and tourism interests). The role of the NTA is to provide one mechanism for the original dispossession of country to be addressed, albeit imperfectly and subject to competing interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Than One Way to Catch a Frog: a Study of Children's
    More than one way to catch a frog: A study of children’s discourse in an Australian contact language Samantha Disbray Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics University of Melbourne December, 2008 Declaration This is to certify that: a. this thesis comprises only my original work towards the PhD b. due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all material used c. the text is less than 100,000 words, exclusive of tables, figures, maps, examples, appendices and bibliography ____________________________ Samantha Disbray Abstract Children everywhere learn to tell stories. One important aspect of story telling is the way characters are introduced and then moved through the story. Telling a story to a naïve listener places varied demands on a speaker. As the story plot develops, the speaker must set and re-set these parameters for referring to characters, as well as the temporal and spatial parameters of the story. To these cognitive and linguistic tasks is the added social and pragmatic task of monitoring the knowledge and attention states of their listener. The speaker must ensure that the listener can identify the characters, and so must anticipate their listener’s knowledge and on-going mental image of the story. How speakers do this depends on cultural conventions and on the resources of the language(s) they speak. For the child speaker the development narrative competence involves an integration, on-line, of a number of skills, some of which are not fully established until the later childhood years.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Land Council and Northern Land Council
    CENTRAL LAND COUNCIL and NORTHERN LAND COUNCIL Submission to the Productivity Commission Draft Report into Resources Sector Regulation 21 August 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. KEY TERMS ____________________________________________________________ 4 2. INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________ 5 PART 1 – DETAILED RESPONSE AND COMMENTARY_________________________ 5 3. LEGAL CONTEXT _______________________________________________________ 5 3.1. ALRA NT ______________________________________________________________ 5 3.2. Native Title Act _________________________________________________________ 6 3.3. The ALRA NT is not alternate to the Native Title Act. __________________________ 6 4. POLICY CONTEXT ______________________________________________________ 6 4.1. Land Council Policy Context ______________________________________________ 6 4.2. Productivity Commission consultation context ________________________________ 8 5. RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS __________________________________ 9 5.1. The EPBC Act, and Northern Territory Environmental Law has recently been subject to specialised review _________________________________________________________ 9 5.2. Pt IV of the ALRA NT has recently been subject to specialised review _____________ 9 5.3. Traditional owners are discrete from the Aboriginal Community and have special rights ____________________________________________________________________ 10 5.4. Free Prior Informed Consent _____________________________________________ 11 5.5. Inaccuracies in the draft Report
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Agency, Institutionalisation and Survival
    2q' t '9à ABORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND PEGGY BROCK B. A. (Hons) Universit¡r of Adelaide Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History/Geography, University of Adelaide March f99f ll TAT}LE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF TAE}LES AND MAPS iii SUMMARY iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . vii ABBREVIATIONS ix C}IAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION I CFIAPTER TWO. TI{E HISTORICAL CONTEXT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA 32 CHAPTER THREE. POONINDIE: HOME AWAY FROM COUNTRY 46 POONINDIE: AN trSTä,TILISHED COMMUNITY AND ITS DESTRUCTION 83 KOONIBBA: REFUGE FOR TI{E PEOPLE OF THE VI/EST COAST r22 CFIAPTER SIX. KOONIBBA: INSTITUTIONAL UPHtrAVAL AND ADJUSTMENT t70 C}IAPTER SEVEN. DISPERSAL OF KOONIBBA PEOPLE AND THE END OF TI{E MISSION ERA T98 CTIAPTER EIGHT. SURVTVAL WITHOUT INSTITUTIONALISATION236 C}IAPTER NINtr. NEPABUNNA: THtr MISSION FACTOR 268 CFIAPTER TEN. AE}ORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND SURVTVAL 299 BIBLIOGRAPI{Y 320 ltt TABLES AND MAPS Table I L7 Table 2 128 Poonindie location map opposite 54 Poonindie land tenure map f 876 opposite 114 Poonindie land tenure map f 896 opposite r14 Koonibba location map opposite L27 Location of Adnyamathanha campsites in relation to pastoral station homesteads opposite 252 Map of North Flinders Ranges I93O opposite 269 lv SUMMARY The institutionalisation of Aborigines on missions and government stations has dominated Aboriginal-non-Aboriginal relations. Institutionalisation of Aborigines, under the guise of assimilation and protection policies, was only abandoned in.the lg7Os. It is therefore important to understand the implications of these policies for Aborigines and Australian society in general. I investigate the affect of institutionalisation on Aborigines, questioning the assumption tl.at they were passive victims forced onto missions and government stations and kept there as virtual prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Fifth Report of the Central Board for the Protection of The
    1889. VICTORIA. TWENTY-FIFTH REPORT OF THE BOARD TOR THE PROTECTION OF THE ABORIGINES IN THE COLONY OF VICTORIA. PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT BY HIS EXCELLENCY'S COMMAND By Authority: ROBT. S. BRAIN, GOVERNMENT PRINTER, MELBOURNE. No. 129.—[!•.]—17377. Digitised by AIATSIS Library, SF 25.3/1 - www.aiatsis.gov.au APPROXIMATE COST OF REPORT. Preparation— Not given, £ s. d. Printing (760 copies) ., .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 0 0 Digitised by AIATSIS Library, SF 25.3/1 - www.aiatsis.gov.au REPORT. 4th November, 1889. SIR, The Board for the Protection of the Aborigines have the honour to submit for Your Excellency's consideration their Twenty-fifth Report on the condition of the Aborigines of this colony, together with the reports from the managers of the stations, and other papers. 1. The Board have held two special and eight ordinary meetings during the past year. 2. The average numbers of Aborigines and half-castes who have resided on the various stations during the year are as follow:— Coranderrk, under the management of Mr. Shaw 78 Framlingham, „ „ Mr. Goodall 90 Lake Condah, „ „ Revd. J. H. Stable 84 Lake Wellington, „ „ Revd. F. A. Hagenauer 61 Lake Tyers, „ „ Revd. John Bulmer 60 Lake Hindmarsh, „ „ Revd. P. Bogisch 48 421 Others visit the stations and reside there during short periods of the year. 3. The number of half-castes, who, under the operation of the new Act for the merging of half-castes among the general population of the colony, are earning their living with some assistance from the Board is 113. 4. Rations and clothing are still supplied to those of the half-castes who, according to the " Amended Act," satisfy the Board of their necessitous circum­ stances.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Requirements to Develop Agricultural Industry in Central Australia
    Submission Number: 213 Attachment C INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS TO DEVELOP AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY IN CENTRAL AUSTRALIA 132°0'0"E 133°0'0"E 134°0'0"E 135°0'0"E 136°0'0"E 137°0'0"E Aboriginal Potential Potential Approximate Bore Field & Water Control Land Trust Water jobs when direct Infrastructure District (ALT) / Allocation fully economic Requirements Area (ML) developed value ($m) ($m) Karlantijpa 1000 20 Tennant ALT Creek + Warumungu $12m $3.94m Frewena ALT 2000 40 (Frewena) 19°0'0"S Frewena 19°0'0"S LIKKAPARTA Tennant Creek Karlantijpa ALT Potential Potential Approximate Bore Field & Water Aboriginal Control Land Trust Water jobs when direct Infrastructure District (ALT) / Area Allocation fully economic Requirements 20°0'0"S (ML) developed value ($m) ($m) 20°0'0"S Illyarne ALT 1500 30 Warrabri ALT 4000 100 $2.9m Western MUNGKARTA Murray $26m (Already Davenport Downs & invested via 1000 ABA $3.5m) Singleton WUTUNUGURRA Station CANTEEN CREEK Illyarne ALT Murray Downs and Singleton Stations ALI CURUNG 21°0'0"S 21°0'0"S WILLOWRA TARA Warrabri ALT AMPILATWATJA WILORA Ahakeye ALT (Community farm) ARAWERR IRRULTJA 22°0'0"S NTURIYA 22°0'0"S PMARA JUTUNTA YUENDUMU YUELAMU Ahakeye ALT (Adelaide Bore) A Potential Potential Approximate Bore Field & B Water LARAMBA Control Aboriginal Land Water jobs when direct Infrastructure C District Trust (ALT) / Area Allocation fully economic Requirements Ahakeye ALT (6 Mile farm) (ML) developed value ($m) ($m) Ahakeye ALT Pine Hill Block B ENGAWALA community farm 30 5 ORRTIPA-THURRA Adelaide bore 1000 20 Ti-Tree $14.4m $3.82m Ahakeye ALT (Bush foods precinct) Pine Hill ‘B’ 1800 20 BushfoodsATITJERE precinct 70 5 6 mile farm 400 10 23°0'0"S 23°0'0"S PAPUNYA Potentia Potential Approximate Bore Field & HAASTS BLUFF Water Aboriginal Control Land Trust l Water jobs when direct Infrastructure District (ALT) / Area Allocati fully economic Requirements on (ML) developed value ($m) ($m) A.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Archives
    INDIGENOUS ARCHIVES 3108 Indigenous Archives.indd 1 14/10/2016 3:37 PM 15 ANACHRONIC ARCHIVE: TURNING THE TIME OF THE IMAGE IN THE ABORIGINAL AVANT-GARDE Khadija von Zinnenburg Carroll Figure 15.1: Daniel Boyd, Untitled TI3, 2015, 56th International Art Exhibition – la Biennale di Venezia, All the World’s Futures. Photo by Andrea Avezzù. Courtesy: la Biennale di Venezia. Daniel Boyd’s Untitled T13 (2015) is not an Aboriginal acrylic dot painting but dots of archival glue placed to match the pixel-like 3108 Indigenous Archives.indd 342 14/10/2016 3:38 PM Anachronic Archive form of a reproduction from a colonial photographic archive. Archival glue is a hard, wax-like material that forms into lumps – the artist compares them to lenses – rather than the smooth two- dimensional dot of acrylic paint. As material evidence of racist photography, Boyd’s paintings in glue at the 2015 Venice Biennale exhibition physicalised the leitmotiv of archives. In Boyd’s Untitled T13 the representation of the Marshall Islands’ navigational charts is an analogy to the visual wayfinding of archival photographs. While not associated with a concrete institution, Boyd’s fake anachronic archive refers to institutional- ised racism – thus fitting the Biennale curator Okwui Enwezor’s curatorial interest in archival and documentary photography, which he argues was invented in apartheid South Africa.1 In the exhibition he curated in 2008, Archive Fever: Uses of the Document in Contemporary Art, Enwezor diagnosed an ‘archival fever’ that had afflicted the art of modernity since the invention of photography. The invention, he believed, had precipitated a seismic shift in how art and temporality were conceived, and that we still live in its wake.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT ARTESIAN BASIN Responsibility to Any Person Using the Information Or Advice Contained Herein
    S O U T H A U S T R A L I A A N D N O R T H E R N T E R R I T O R Y G R E A T A R T E S I A N B A S I N ( E RNturiyNaturiyaO M A N G A B A S I N ) Pmara JutPumntaara Jutunta YuenduYmuuendumuYuelamu " " Y"uelamu Hydrogeological Map (Part " 2) Nyirri"pi " " Papunya Papunya ! Mount Liebig " Mount Liebig " " " Haasts Bluff Haasts Bluff ! " Ground Elevation & Aquifer Conditions " Groundwater Salinity & Management Zones ! ! !! GAB Wells and Springs Amoonguna ! Amoonguna " GAB Spring " ! ! ! Salinity (μ S/cm) Hermannsburg Hermannsburg ! " " ! Areyonga GAB Spring Exclusion Zone Areyonga ! Well D Spring " Wallace Rockhole Santa Teresa " Wallace Rockhole Santa Teresa " " " " Extent of Saturated Aquifer ! D 1 - 500 ! D 5001 - 7000 Extent of Confined Aquifer ! D 501 - 1000 ! D 7001 - 10000 Titjikala Titjikala " " NT GAB Management Zone ! D ! Extent of Artesian Water 1001 - 1500 D 10001 - 25000 ! D ! Land Surface Elevation (m AHD) 1501 - 2000 D 25001 - 50000 Imanpa Imanpa ! " " ! ! D 2001 - 3000 ! ! 50001 - 100000 High : 1515 ! Mutitjulu Mutitjulu ! ! D " " ! 3001 - 5000 ! ! ! Finke Finke ! ! ! " !"!!! ! Northern Territory GAB Water Control District ! ! ! Low : -15 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! FNWAP Management Zone NORTHERN TERRITORY Birdsville NORTHERN TERRITORY ! ! ! Birdsville " ! ! ! " ! ! SOUTH AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!! !!!! D !! D !!! DD ! DD ! !D ! ! DD !! D !! !D !! D !! D ! D ! D ! D ! D ! !! D ! D ! D ! D ! DDDD ! Western D !! ! ! ! ! Recharge Zone ! ! ! ! ! ! D D ! ! ! ! ! ! N N ! ! A A ! L L ! ! ! ! S S ! ! N N ! ! Western Zone E
    [Show full text]
  • Karajarri Literature Review 2014
    Tukujana Nganyjurrukura Ngurra All of us looking after country together Literature Review for Terrestrial & Marine Environments on Karajarri Land and Sea Country Compiled by Tim Willing 2014 Acknowledgements The following individuals are thanked for assistance in the DISCLAIMERS compilation of this report: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the Karajarri Rangers and Co-ordinator Thomas King; author and do not necessarily reflect the official view of the Kimberley Land Council’s Land and Sea Management unit. While reasonable Members of the Karajarri Traditional Lands Association efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication (KTLA) and IPA Cultural Advisory Committee: Joseph Edgar, are factually correct, the Land and Sea Management Unit accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents. To the Mervyn Mulardy Jnr, Joe Munro, Geraldine George, Jaqueline extent permitted by law, the Kimberley Land Council excludes all liability Shovellor, Anna Dwyer, Alma Bin Rashid, Faye Dean, Frankie to any person for any consequences, including, but not limited to all Shovellor, Lenny Hopiga, Shirley Spratt, Sylvia Shovellor, losses, damages, costs, expenses, and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and Celia Bennett, Wittidong Mulardy, Jessica Bangu and Rosie any information or material contained in it. Munro. This report contains cultural and intellectual property belonging to the Richard Meister from the KLC Land and Sea Management Karajarri Traditional Lands Association. Users are accordingly cautioned Unit, for coordination, meeting and editorial support as well to seek formal permission before reproducing any material from this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands
    Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands: Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources by the Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre Anita Smyth Anthea Coggan Famiza Yunus Russell Gorddard Stuart Whitten Jocelyn Davies Nic Gambold Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards Rob Brandle Mike Fleming John Read June 2007 Copyright and Disclaimers © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Contributing author information Anita Smyth: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Anthea Coggan: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Famiza Yunus: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Russell Gorddard: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Stuart Whitten: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Jocelyn Davies: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Nic Gambold: Central Land Council Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards: Ngaanyatjarra Council Rob Brandle: South Austalia Department for Environment and Heritage Mike Fleming: South Australia Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation John Read: BHP Billiton Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 18 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source.
    [Show full text]