DOCSLIB.ORG

The Army War College & Carlisle Barracks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Army War College & Carlisle Barracks WarCollege_FINAL.qxp_REPORT_1 7/18/18 11:01 AM Page 1 PENNSYLVANIA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS // IMPACTS J CARLISLE BARRACKS & THE ARMY WAR COLLEGE WarCollege_FINAL.qxp_REPORT_1 7/18/18 11:01 AM Page 2 This report was produced by the University of Pittsburgh Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) and financed by a grant from the Pennsylvania Military Community Enhancement Commission, Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development, with additional funding support from Team PA. June 2018 WarCollege_FINAL.qxp_REPORT_1 7/18/18 11:01 AM Page 3 CARLISLE BARRACKS & THE ARMY WAR COLLEGE This report is part of the Pennsylvania Military Community Enhancement Commission-sponsored study of the economic impacts of Pennsylvania’s military and defense installations. The aim of the project is to aid the Commis- sion and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in understanding the economic and strategic value of its major military installations regionally and nationally, as well as their ties to surrounding communities and Pennsylvania industry. he Garrison at Carlisle Barracks (Cumber - Distance Education Program. Graduates of the two- land County, Pennsylvania) is home to the year distance education program can earn a master’s U.S. Army War College (USAWC) and the degree in strategic studies and meet Department of De - U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center fense (DoD) Joint Professional Military Education T (USAHEC). The Army’s Dunham Medical (JPME) requirements. Resident programs have almost Clinic is also located at the installation and serves as a 400 enrollees while 800 students are enrolled in dis - regional medical center supporting Active Duty and re - tance education. tired service members across Central Pennsylvania. USAWC also serves as the Army’s center for strate - USAWC is the Army’s senior service college, the gic analysis and general officer education. The Army capstone in the continuum of training and education Strategic Education Program was formalized in 2017 provided to competitively-selected senior career mili - and runs Professional Military Education—both at tary officers in the grade of Lieutenant Colonel and Carlisle Barracks and as mobile training at major Army Colonel. The majority of resident students are enrolled installations—for the entire population of Army gen - in a 10-month course that leads to a master’s degree in eral officers. Major programs include the Center for strategic studies. Students include Active, Reserve, and Strategic Leadership, which provides strategic wargam - Guard officers from all services. In addition, high-level ing exercises for senior Army leadership throughout the government civilians and military International Fellows year; the Strategic Studies Institute; and the Peacekeep - from 80 counties attend USAWC. Military officers and ing and Stability Operations Institute. federal civilian employees also take part in USAWC’s >> 1 PA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS & IMPACTS CARLISLE BARRACKS & THE ARMY WAR COLLEGE WarCollege_FINAL.qxp_REPORT_1 7/18/18 11:01 AM Page 4 > > Other specialized short-term training programs These education and research efforts are comple - hosted by USAWC include the Combined/Joint Force mented by the co-location of the USAHEC at Carlisle Land Component Commander Course (C/JFLCC) and Barracks. USAHEC supports the Army Heritage Mu - the Nominative Leader Course (NLC). The C/JFLCC seum as well as the USAWC Library and today incor - Course originated in 2003, directed by the U.S. Army porates the U.S Army Military History Institute. The Chief of Staff to build upon the positive lessons of Institute operates the Army's central historical archival Army and Marine Corps cooperation during overseas repository, managing and executing the archival mis - contingency operations. The NLC is a two-week course sion for historical materials pertaining to military and designed to prepare Command Sergeants Major (CSM) U.S. Army history and manages the Department of the for duties as CSMs of major Army commands. Army’s directed oral history programs: the Senior Of - ficer Oral History Program and Division Command Lessons Learned. J arlisle Barracks’ history as a military en - School, which opened in 1879. The Interior Depart - campment dates at least to the French and ment expanded the site by 109 acres in 1897 and an Indian War when the area was used as additional 175 acres in 1901. Upon the U.S. entry into staging ground for British and American World War I, the expanded site reverted back to the C troops preparing to engage French forces War Department. During the war, the installation in Western Pennsylvania. The site, then named “Wash - served as a rehabilitation hospital and in 1920 became ingtonburg,” was designated by the Continental Con - home to a new Medical Field Service School for Active gress as an ordinance center in 1777. During what Duty, Reserve, and National Guard medical officers. became known as the Whiskey Rebellion, Carlisle be - The school was responsible for multiple innovations in came a center for mobilization of approximately combat medicine, including the development of the 14,000 federal troops before President Washington led “Carlisle Bandage,” eventually carried by most soldiers them into Western Pennsylvania. 1 during World War II. 3 The Medical Field Service School The site was owned by the Penn family but rented was moved to Fort Sam Houston in 1946. Since 1951, free of charge to Pennsylvania between 1755 and 1801. Carlisle Barracks has primarily been the home of The original Army post at Carlisle Barracks consisted USAWC. of 29 acres acquired by the War Department in 1801. 2 USAWC initially began operation in 1901 at the For 23 years prior to the outbreak of the Civil War, Washington Barracks in the District of Columbia (cur - Carlisle served as the home of the Army’s Calvary rently Fort McNair). The institution suspended opera - School. In 1863, the site was briefly occupied and tions during World War I and again in 1940. Following burned by Confederate troops just before they engaged World War II, USAWC was reestablished at Fort Leav - with Union Troops at the Battle of Gettysburg. enworth, Kansas in 1950, and the following year was The site was turned over to the Interior Depart - relocated to Carlisle Barracks in October 1951. J ment in 1870 for use as the Carlisle Indian Industrial 2 PA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS & IMPACTS CARLISLE BARRACKS & THE ARMY WAR COLLEGE WarCollege_FINAL.qxp_REPORT_1 7/18/18 11:02 AM Page 5 his report estimates the total economic impact This economic impact analysis quantifies the potential of Army operations at Carlisle Barracks ac - impact on employment and economic output of opera - cruing within the State of Pennsylvania and tions at Carlisle Barracks. This could be interpreted as an estimate for the local economic impact the result if USAWC was disestablished and all opera - T within Cumberland County. The IMPLAN tions at Carlisle Barracks were relocated outside of Penn - model was used to estimate the direct, indirect, and in - sylvania. USAWC staff provided data and personnel, duced impacts generated by the ongoing operations at payroll, and expenditures for the 2015–16 federal fiscal USAWC, including USAHEC and the Army’s Dunham year; results reflect economic impact over that period. Medical Clinic. Direct impacts are the employment and The total economic impacts generated by Army op - spending by Army organizations located at Carlisle Bar - erations at Carlisle Barracks, broken down by direct, in - racks, which includes the impacts of resident students direct, and induced sources include: (see Table 1) enrolled in USAWC programs. Indirect impacts, some - • A total of 2,868 jobs within the state of Pennsylvania, times called intermediate impacts, are generated by the generating over $229 million in labor income annually. supply chain purchases of these organizations. Induced impacts derive from the spending patterns of civilian em - • $521 million in overall economic output within Penn - ployees and service members at Carlisle Barracks and sylvania. Just under $434 million of this was estimated to other workers whose jobs are generated by operations at be Gross Regional Product (GRP), or value-added produc - the installation. tion, generated within the state. J >> 3 Source: University of Pittsburgh Center for Social and Urban Research, 2018 PA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS & IMPACTS CARLISLE ARMY BARRACKS & THE ARMY WAR COLLEGE 4 WarCollege_FINAL.qxp_REPORT_1 7/18/18 11:02 AM Page 6 he sections that follow originate from an Army and DoD leadership is crucial for USAWC’s edu - analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportu - cation, research, and directed policy and planning mis - nities, and threats (SWOT) at USAWC. sions. Strengths and weaknesses include attributes, As with all institutions of higher education, a prin - T assets, or factors that are internal to the in - cipal strength of USAWC is the core faculty and staff. stallation. Threats are external factors that are harmful The key areas of research specializations among to, or create vulnerabilities for, the installation. Oppor - USAWC staff are critical to supporting Army and De - tunities offer ways to mitigate threats and weaknesses fense Department needs; many are concentrated in and/or reinforce and expand on the installation’s unique areas that are difficult to find elsewhere either strengths. The SWOT analysis is summarized in Table within the defense establishment or at civilian institu - 2 and aspects of the analysis are described throughout tions. the following sections. As part of its core education mission, USAWC has One of the key advantages of Carlisle Barracks as become a pillar for international military education by a location for USAWC is its proximity to Washington, hosting students from a wide range of partner nations. D.C. Within 100 miles from the Pentagon, visitors from The USAWC International Fellows program began with D.C. or Northern Virginia can easily reach Carlisle by six students enrolled in the 1977 –78 academic year and car or air. Students can regularly travel to D.C., indi - has expanded to 80 students in recent classes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update
    As of May 17, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 2: Director of Administration and Management (DA&M), the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the DA&M, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilians between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memorandum on the conditions- based approach to personnel movement and travel dated March 15, 2021. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 202 of 230 Installations (88%) (Met: Step 1 & Step 2) Of the 202 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 0 reinstated travel restrictions while 6 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of May 17, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD Yes ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL Yes BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany Yes CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea Yes CAMP DODGE Army USA - IA Yes CAMP HENRY Army South Korea Yes CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea Yes CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan No CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA Yes DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI No FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA Yes FORT BENNING Army USA - GA Yes FORT BLISS Army USA - TX No FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC Yes FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO Yes FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI Yes FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD Yes FORT DRUM Army USA - NY Yes FORT GEORGE G.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Indians Came to Carlisle
    HOW THE INDIANS CAME TO CARLISLE By Louis MORTON* L ATE on the night of October 6, 1879, the townspeople of Car- L lisle, Pennsylvania, began to gather at the railroad junction just east of the town. Impatiently the crowd awaited the arrival of the train. Aboard were no distinguished passengers, only about 100 Indian boys and girls from some of the fiercest tribes in the West. For many of the townsmen, it would be their first sight of real Indians, but it was more than curiosity that had brought theni out so late that brisk fall night. These Indians were no passing side-show. They had come to live at Carlisle, at the old military barracks where a school for Indians was to be formed. The train was bringing in the first class.' From this beginning grew the famed Indian School at Carlisle. For almost forty years the school prospered, attracting wide atten- tion and strong support from friends of the red man, to fall at last a fatality to World War I, when it was converted into an Army hospital.t Its students, numbering in the thousands, took back to their people a better understanding of the white man's civilization; its great athletes swept all opposition before them and left in their wake a string of broken records and a host of anecdotes. To Carlisle the school brought fame and a golden era it still recalls nostalgically. But all this lay in the future that night when the townsmen greeted the bewildered and sleepy Indian children who descended from the train at midnight to begin the long weary march to their new home.
    [Show full text]
  • Brig Gen Boone Biography
    Brigadier General Lewis M. Boone Director, U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Brigadier General Lewis Boone was commissioned a second lieutenant of Infantry in 1980 following graduation from the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program at Western Maryland College with a bachelor’s degree in sociology. Following commissioning, he attended the Infantry Officer Basic Course at Fort Benning, Georgia, before heading to his first assignment, at 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division, in Erlangen, Germany. There he served as a platoon leader and company executive officer with the 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry. For his next assignment he returned to Fort Benning to attend the Infantry Officer Advanced Course and Ranger school. He remained at Fort Benning to serve with the 29th Infantry Regiment as armored carrier operations chief, battalion motor officer and company commander in both 1st and 2nd Battalions, 29th Infantry, and later as operations officer for the 29th’s Bradley Training Detachment. Brigadier General Boone next attended the Defense Information School at Fort Benjamin Harrison, Ind., and then moved to Fort Bragg, N.C., where he began his tenure in Army public affairs as commander of the 49th Public Affairs Detachment and later as the XVIII Airborne Corps command information officer. During Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, he served as the XVIII Airborne Corps public information officer with the primary duty of escorting media during both operations. Following redeployment from Southwest Asia, he served as the 82nd Airborne Division public affairs officer until departure for Fort Leavenworth, Kan., to attend the Command and General Staff Officer School. Brigadier General Boone next served in a joint assignment, as a public affairs action officer for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Lt. Col. Angela M. Schmillen Is the Defense Commissary Agency’S Director of Public Health and Safety
    Biography DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY 1300 E Avenue, Fort Lee, Virginia 23801-1800 Lt. Col. Angela M. Schmillen Director of Public Health and Safety Army Lt. Col. Angela M. Schmillen is the Defense Commissary Agency’s director of Public Health and Safety. She supports the DeCA Director, his staff, and the entire DeCA network of stores and distribution facilities by developing policy and providing advice on issues pertaining to personnel safety, food safety and food defense. Her appointment was effective July 1. At DeCA, Lt. Col. Schmillen leads and manages the agency’s health and safety personnel in Asia, Europe and the United States, providing review and oversight of health and safety site visits to include disposition of issues identified. She and her headquarters staff provide the DeCA interface with other military and federal public health, food safety, and personnel safety elements. Before coming to DeCA, Lt. Col. Schmillen served as the deputy director for Force Health Protection, Army Capability Manager – Army Health System at the Medical Center of Excellence at Fort Sam Houston, Texas. There she worked to identify issues and facilitate solution implementation within the DoD model Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and education, Personnel, Facilities and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) domains as they impact operational force health protection capabilities. Lt. Col. Schmillen has been a veterinarian for 16 years, graduating veterinary school in 2005 from the University of Florida. She subsequently entered active duty as a Captain in the Army Veterinary Corps. Her previous assignments included stops at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho; Mannheim, Germany; and Fort Hood, Texas, where she served as a veterinary preventive medicine instructor for the First Year Graduate Veterinary Education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Visits Carlisle
    arlisle is located in the destroyed. He also set fi re to the gas works and a lumber yard. CCumberland Valley of south He intended a cavalry attack the next morning, but overnight he Self-guided Tour central Pennsylvania, close received orders from Gen. R.E. Lee recalling his force to the main enough to the Mason-Dixon Confederate army in Gettysburg. Carlisle was spared any further Line that rumors of Confederate damage. invasion surfaced often during the Civil War. In the summer of 1863 Union Offi cers and their wives those rumors became fact. In an at Carlisle Barracks prior to the attempt to deal a major, perhaps Confederate invasion. fatal blow to the Union cause, General Robert E. Lee ordered his Army of Northern Virginia northward through the Shenandoah Valley and into Pennsylvania. The spearhead of that army reached Carlisle on Saturday, June 27, 1863. Its commanding offi cer, Lt. Gen. Richard Ewell, had been posted at the U.S. Army cavalry school in Carlisle after graduating from West Point in 1841 and knew many local citizens. His force included a vangaurd of about The Civil War 1,200 cavalrymen under Brig. Gen. Albert Jenkins, followed by over 8,000 infantrymen in the division of Maj. Gen. Visits Carlisle Robert Rodes. West of town, Gen. Edward Johnson had 6,000 Prelude to Gettysburg troops camped at Cumberland Valley Visitors Center Alexander Springs Rebels shelling Carlisle’s Square as sketched by Thomas Nast for Harper’s Weekly. near Rte 11 in Carlisle. For more self-guided tours go to A self-guided tour of 1863 The Confederate Troops occupied and controlled the town for visitcumberlandvalley.com, or visit the three days.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98Th Congress an Act
    PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1984, and for Oct. 11, 1983 other purposes. [H.R. 2972] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may Military be cited as the "Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984'\ Au'thorizSn Act, 1984. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $31,100,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $15,300,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $17,760,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $3,000,000. Fort Douglas, Utah, $910,000. Fort Drum, New York, $1,500,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $76,050,000. Fort Hunter Liggett, California, $1,000,000. Fort Irwin, California, $34,850,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $35,310,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $5,150,000. Fort Ord, California, $6,150,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $16,180,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $940,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $76,600,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,720,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $1,300,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $31,900,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, $1,500,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,900,000.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Organizational Codes
    Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: ARMY0 Lvl Org Code and Description 1 USARMY United States Army 2 0100000 IMCOM Pacific Regional Office 3 01AK001 Fort Greely 4 01AK001FES Fort Greely FES 4 01AK001NR Fort Greely NR 3 01AK002 Fort Wainwright 4 01AK002FES Fort Wainwright FES 4 01AK002NR Fort Wainwright NR 3 01HI001 USAG Schofield 4 01HI001FES USAG Schofield FES 4 01HI001NR USAG Schofield NR 3 01HI002 USAG Hawaii PTA 4 01HI002FES USAG Hawaii PTA FES 4 01HI002NR USAG Hawaii PTA NR 2 0200000 IMCOM West Regional Office 3 02AZ001 Ft. Huachuca 4 02AZ001FES Ft. Huachuca FES 4 02AZ001NR Ft. Huachuca NR 3 02AZ002 Yuma Proving Ground 4 02AZ002FES Yuma Proving Ground FES 4 02AZ002NR Yuma Proving Ground NR 3 02CA001 Camp Parks 4 02CA001FES Camp Parks FES 4 02CA001NR Camp Parks NR 3 02CA002 Ft. Hunter Liggett 4 02CA002FES Ft. Hunter Liggett FES 4 02CA002NR Ft. Hunter Liggett NR 3 02CA003 Ft. Irwin 4 02CA003FES Ft. Irwin FES 4 02CA003NR Ft. Irwin NR 3 02CA004 Persidio Mont. 4 02CA004FES Persidio Mont. FES 4 02CA004NR Persidio Mont. NR 3 02CA005 Shape Army Depot 4 02CA005FES Shape Army Depot FES 4 02CA005NR Shape Army Depot NR 3 02CA006 Military Ocean Terminal Concord 4 02CA006FES Military Ocean Terminal Concord FES 4 02CA006NR Military Ocean Terminal Concord NR 3 02CA007 Sierra Army Depot 4 02CA007FES Sierra Army Depot FES 4 02CA007NR Sierra Army Depot NR 3 02NV001 Hawthorne Army Depot 4 02NV001FES Hawthorne Army Depot FES 4 02NV001NR Hawthorne Army Depot NR 3 02UT001 Dugway Proving Ground 4 02UT001FES Dugway Proving
    [Show full text]
  • Military Construction, Family Housing, and Base Realignment and Closure Program
    CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS (C-1) Department of Defense Budget Fiscal Year 2021 Feb 2020 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Preface The C-1 is provided annually to the DoD oversight committees of the Congress coincident with the transmittal of the President's Budget. This document is also provided to Office of Assistance Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) for use by non-DoD activities, and is available to the public on the Internet at http://comptroller.defense.gov/ Office of the Under Secretary Defense (Comptroller) Department of Defense Preparation of the C-1 cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $38,000 in FY 2020. i UNCLASSIFIED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK UNCLASSIFIED TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary State and Country Listing Page FY 2019 Summary by Appropriation………......…………...........................SUMMARY 1-3 Summary by Location and Purpose................................................ 4-13 Summary by State and Country...................................................... 14-15 Summary by State and Country by Component............................. 16-21 FY 2020 Summary by Appropriation………......………............................... 22-24 Summary by Location and Purpose................................................ 25-34 Summary by State and Country...................................................... 35-36 Summary by State and Country by Component............................. 37-41 FY 2021 Summary by Appropriation………......………............................... 42-43 Summary by Location and Purpose...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Army
    United States Army Lieutenant General SCOTT D. BERRIER Deputy Chief of Staff, G-2 United States Army 1000 Army Pentagon 2E408 Washington, DC 20310-1000 Since: January 2018 SOURCE OF COMMISSIONED SERVICE ROTC EDUCATIONAL DEGREES University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point – BS – History Central Michigan University – MS – General Studies United States Army War College – MSS – Strategic Studies MILITARY SCHOOLS ATTENDED Military Intelligence Officer Basic and Advanced Courses United States Army Command and General Staff College United States Army War College FOREIGN LANGUAGE(S) None recorded PROMOTIONS DATE OF APPOINTMENT 2LT 25 May 83 1LT 24 Mar 86 CPT 1 Feb 89 MAJ 1 Feb 96 LTC 1 May 01 COL 1 Feb 06 BG 3 Sep 11 MG 2 Mar 14 LTG 30 Jan 18 FROM TO ASSIGNMENT Jan 18 Present Deputy Chief of Staff, G-2, United States Army, Washington, DC Aug 17 Jan 18 Special Assistant to the Director of the Army Staff, Office of the Chief of Staff, United States Army, Washington, DC Jul 15 Jul 17 Commanding General/Commandant, United States Army Intelligence Center of Excellence and Fort Huachuca, Fort Huachuca, Arizona Jun 14 Jun 15 Deputy Chief of Staff, Intelligence, International Security Assistance Force, later Resolute Support Mission, North Atlantic Treaty Organization/Deputy Director, J-2, United States Forces-Afghanistan, OPERATIONS ENDURING FREEDOM and FREEDOM'S SENTINEL, Afghanistan Dec 11 Jun 14 Director, J-2, United States Central Command, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida Aug 10 Dec 11 Deputy Assistant Chief of Staff, C-2/J-2, United Nations Command/Combined
    [Show full text]
  • Same Fy21 Dod and Federal Programs Briefing: Usace Military Programs
    SAME FY21 DOD AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS BRIEFING: USACE MILITARY PROGRAMS 17 March 2020, 1500-1600 Mr. Lloyd C. Caldwell, P.E., SES Mr. Michael L. Schultz, SES Director of Military Programs Chief, Interagency and International Services Dr. Christine T. Altendorf, P.E., SES Chief, Engineering and Construction Ms. Jill Stiglich, SES Division Director of Contracting Mr. Stacey K. Hirata, P.E., SES Chief, Programs Integration Division World-Class Delivery… Real-World Impact! 1 VISION & MISSION USACE Mission USACE Vision Deliver vital engineering solutions, in collaboration Engineering solutions for the with our partners, to secure our Nation, energize our Nation’s toughest challenges. economy, and reduce risk from disaster. Globally Engaged and Regionally Aligned Northwestern North Division Atlantic ( Portland ) Division ( New York City ) Trans- Atlantic Pacific North Division ( Winchester, VA ) Ocean Atlantic Division Division ( Honolulu ) South ( New York City ) Atlantic Division ( Atlanta ) Engagement ( 110+ Countries ) Physical Presence ( 39 Countries ) USACE Has a Diverse Mission Set Driven by Diverse Stakeholders 2 PROJECTED MILITARY PROGRAMS WORKLOAD FY20 - $34.7B FY21* - $23.1B ($M) Overseas Contingency Operations, ($M) Real Estate, $1,034 , 3% $207 , 1% Overseas Contingency Operations, $220 , 1% R&D, $547 , 2% Installation Spt., Real Estate, $5,165 , 15% Other, $1,022 , 4% MILCON, MILCON, $12,234 , Installation Spt., $886 , 3% $3,984 , 17% 35% $5,055 , 22% Eng. & Design, $2,170 , 9% Interagency & International Services, $8,117 , 23% Eng.
    [Show full text]
  • Major General David H. Huntoon, Jr., USA Commandant, U.S. Army War College
    Major General David H. Huntoon, Jr., USA Commandant, U.S. Army War College Major General David H. Huntoon, Jr. was commissioned in 1973 from the United States Military Academy at West Point. From 1973-1986, he served as an Infantry officer in a series of command and staff assignments with the 3rd Infantry Regiment at Fort Myer, Virginia, the 9th Infantry Division at Fort Lewis, Washington, the 7th Army Training Command at Vilseck, Germany, and with the 3rd Infantry Division in Aschaffenburg, Germany. From 1986-1988, Major General Huntoon attended the Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas and the School for Advanced Military Studies. He then served in the Directorate of Plans, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, as Senior War Plans Officer (Operation Just Cause), Deputy Director of Plans (Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm), and Director of Plans. From 1992-1994, Major General Huntoon commanded 5th Battalion, 20th Infantry (Mechanized) at Camp Casey, Korea, and served as Chief of Plans, CJ3, Combined Forces Command and United Nations Command, Yongsan. In 1994-95, he was the Army's National Security Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He then took command of the 3d U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard), Fort Myer, Virginia. From 1997-1999, Major General Huntoon served as the Executive Officer to the Chief of Staff of the United States Army. He was the Assistant Division Commander of the 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, Texas, 1999-2000, and from 2000- 2002, the Deputy Commandant of the US Army Command and General Staff College.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update
    As of February 1, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet State/Country Opening Up America Gating Criteria (14 Day Declining Trend in Symptoms & Cases; No Stay At Home Order)* Step 2: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 3: CMO, the Sec of a Mil Department, or a CCDR approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 and Step 2 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the Chief Management Officer, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. * Data obtained from Center for Diseases Control, Health and Human Services, and State Health Departments Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilian between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memo on the conditions-based, phased approach to personnel movement and travel dated May 22, 2020. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 86 of 231 Installations (37%) (Met: Step 1, Step 2, & Step 3) Of the 86 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 2 reinstated travel restrictions while 2 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of February 1, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State
    [Show full text]