COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update As of February 1, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet State/Country Opening Up America Gating Criteria (14 Day Declining Trend in Symptoms & Cases; No Stay At Home Order)* Step 2: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 3: CMO, the Sec of a Mil Department, or a CCDR approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 and Step 2 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the Chief Management Officer, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. * Data obtained from Center for Diseases Control, Health and Human Services, and State Health Departments Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilian between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memo on the conditions-based, phased approach to personnel movement and travel dated May 22, 2020. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 86 of 231 Installations (37%) (Met: Step 1, Step 2, & Step 3) Of the 86 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 2 reinstated travel restrictions while 2 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of February 1, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD Yes ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL No BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany Yes CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea No CAMP DODGE Army USA - IA No CAMP HENRY Army South Korea No CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea No CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan No CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA No DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI No FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA Yes FORT BENNING Army USA - GA No FORT BLISS Army USA - TX No FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC No FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO No FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI Yes FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD Yes FORT DRUM Army USA - NY Yes FORT GEORGE G. MEADE Army USA - MD Yes FORT GORDON Army USA - GA No FORT HAMILTON Army USA - NY Yes FORT HOOD Army USA - TX No FORT HUACHUCA Army USA - AZ No FORT IRWIN Army USA - CA No FORT JACKSON Army USA - SC No FORT KNOX Army USA - KY Yes FORT LEAVENWORTH Army USA - KS No FORT LEE Army USA - VA Yes FORT LEONARD WOOD Army USA - MO No FORT MCCOY Army USA - WI No FORT POLK Army USA - LA Yes FORT RILEY Army USA - KS Yes FORT RUCKER Army USA - AL No FORT SILL Army USA - OK Yes FORT STEWART Army USA - GA No FORT WILLIAM H. HARRISON Army USA - MT Yes GRAFENWOHR GERMANY Army Germany Yes 2 of 8 As of February 1, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted HOHENFELS GERMANY Army Germany Yes JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD Army USA - WA Yes JOINT BASE MYER HENDERSON HALL Army USA - DC Yes KAISERSLAUTERN Army Germany Yes LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA No LEXINGTON BLUE GRASS DEPOT Army USA - KY No LOS ALAMITOS AFRC Army USA - CA No MCALESTER ARMY AMMO PLANT Army USA - OK No PICATINNY ARSENAL Army USA - NJ Yes PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY Army USA - CA No RED RIVER DEPOT Army USA - TX No REDSTONE ARSENAL Army USA - AL No ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL Army USA - IL Yes SAN JUAN FORT BUCHANAN Army Puerto Rico No SCHOFIELD BARRACKS Army USA - HI No SIERRA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - CA No STUTTGART GERMANY Army Germany Yes TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA No US ARMY GARRISON ALASKA Army USA - AK No US ARMY GARRISON HAWAII Army USA - HI No US ARMY GARRISON MIAMI Army USA - FL No USA NATICK RSCH & DEV CTR Army USA - MA No VICENZA ITALY Army Italy Yes VILSECK Army Germany Yes WATERVLIET ARSENAL Army USA - NY No WEST POINT MILRES Army USA - NY Yes WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE Army USA - NM Yes WIESBADEN GERMANY Army Germany Yes YONGSAN KOREA Army South Korea No YUMA PROVING GROUND Army USA - AZ Yes DFAS CLEVELAND CENTER CMO USA - OH No DFAS COLUMBUS CENTER CMO USA - OH No DFAS HEADQUARTERS CMO USA - IN No PENTAGON BUILDING SITE CMO USA - VA Yes ANNAPOLIS NS(INCL USNA) Navy USA - MD No CBC GULFPORT MS Navy USA - MS No CHINA LAKE NAVWEAPCEN Navy USA - CA No COMFLEACT OKINAWA JA Navy Japan No 3 of 8 As of February 1, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted CORONADO NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - CA No CORPUS CHRISTI NAS Navy USA - TX No CRANE NAVWEAPSUPPCEN Navy USA - IN No FALLON NAS Navy USA - NV No FLEET ACTIVITIES CHINHAE KS Navy South Korea No FLEET ACTIVITIES SASEBO Navy Japan No INDIAN HEAD NAV ORD STA Navy USA - MD No JACKSONVILLE NAS Navy USA - FL No JBPHH PEARL HARBOR HAWAII Navy USA - HI No KEY WEST NAS Navy USA - FL No KINGS BAY NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - GA No LEMOORE NAS Navy USA - CA No LITTLE CREEK NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - VA No MAYPORT NAVSTA Navy USA - FL No MERIDIAN NAS Navy USA - MS No NAF ATSUGI JA Navy Japan No NAF MISAWA JA Navy Japan No NAS JRB FT WORTH TX Navy USA - TX No NAS KINGSVILLE TX Navy USA - TX No NAS SIGONELLA SICILY Navy Italy No NAVAL BASE KITSAP-BREMERTON Navy USA - WA No NAVAL STATION EVERETT Navy USA - WA No NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES Navy USA - IL No NAVAL STATION GUAM Navy Guam No NAVAL STATION NEWPORT Navy USA - RI No NAVAL STATION ROTA SPAIN Navy Spain Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MID-SOU Navy USA - TN No NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MONTEREY CA Navy USA - CA No NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH Navy USA - DC No NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY Navy USA - FL No NAVAL TRAINING CTR ORLANDO Navy USA - FL No NAVBASE POINT LOMA Navy USA - CA No NAVBASE SAN DIEGO CA Navy USA - CA No NAVBASE VENTURA CTY Navy USA - CA No NAVMAG INDIAN ISLAND Navy USA - WA No NAVSTA GUANTANAMO BAY Navy Cuba Yes NAVSUPPACT BETHESDA MD Navy USA - MD No NAVSUPPACT HAMPTON ROADS VA Navy USA - VA No 4 of 8 As of February 1, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted NAVSUPPACT MECHANICSBURG PA Navy USA - PA No NAVSUPPACT NAPLES IT Navy Italy No NAVSUPPFAC BEAUFORT SC Navy USA - SC No NEW LONDON NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - CT No NEW ORLEANS NAS JRB Navy USA - LA No NORFOLK NAV SHIPYD Navy USA - VA No NORFOLK NAVAL BASE Navy USA - VA No NSA ANDERSEN Navy Guam No NSA BAHRAIN Navy Bahrain No NSA SARATOGA SPRINGS NY Navy USA - NY No NSD YOKOSUKA JAPAN Navy Japan No NSY PORTSMOUTH Navy USA - NH No NWS EARLE NJ Navy USA - NJ No OCEANA NAS Navy USA - VA No PATUXENT RIVER NAS Navy USA - MD No PENSACOLA NAS Navy USA - FL No SEAL BEACH NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - CA No WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS Navy USA - WA No WHITING FIELD NAS Navy USA - FL No YORKTOWN NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - VA No ALTUS AFB USAF USA - OK Yes AVIANO AB USAF Italy Yes BARKSDALE AFB USAF USA - LA Yes BEALE AFB USAF USA - CA No BUCKLEY AFB USAF USA - CO Yes CANNON AFB USAF USA - NM No COLUMBUS AFB USAF USA - MS Yes DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB USAF USA - AZ No DOBBINS ARB USAF USA - GA Yes DOVER AFB USAF USA - DE Yes DYESS AFB USAF USA - TX Yes EDWARDS AFB USAF USA - CA No EGLIN AFB USAF USA - FL No EIELSON AFB USAF USA - AK No ELLSWORTH AFB USAF USA - SD No F E WARREN AFB USAF USA - WY Yes FAIRCHILD AFB USAF USA - WA Yes GOODFELLOW AFB USAF USA - TX Yes 5 of 8 As of February 1, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted GRAND FORKS AFB USAF USA - ND Yes GRISSOM AFB USAF USA - IN Yes HANSCOM AFB USAF USA - MA Yes HILL AFB USAF USA - UT Yes HOLLOMAN AFB USAF USA - NM No HOMESTEAD AFB USAF USA - FL No HURLBURT FIELD USAF USA - FL No INCIRLIK AB SITE 1 USAF Turkey Yes JB ANACOSTIA-BOLLING USAF USA - DC Yes JB ANDREWS USAF USA - MD Yes JB CHARLESTON USAF USA - SC Yes JB ELMENDORF RICHARDSON USAF USA - AK No JB LANGLEY-EUSTIS USAF USA - VA No JB MCGUIRE DIX LAKEHURST USAF USA - NJ No JB SAN ANTONIO USAF USA - TX No KADENA AB USAF Japan No KEESLER AFB USAF USA - MS Yes KIRTLAND AFB USAF USA - NM No KUNSAN AB USAF South Korea No LAUGHLIN AFB USAF USA - TX No LITTLE ROCK AFB USAF USA - AR No LOS ANGELES AFB USAF USA - CA No LUKE AFB USAF USA - AZ No MACDILL AFB USAF USA - FL No MALMSTROM AFB USAF USA - MT Yes MARCH AFB USAF USA - CA Yes MAXWELL AFB (INCL. GUNTER) USAF USA - AL No MCCONNELL AFB USAF USA - KS No MINN ST PAUL ARS USAF USA - MN No MINOT AFB USAF USA - ND Yes MISAWA AB USAF Japan No MOODY AFB USAF USA - GA No MOUNTAIN HOME AFB USAF USA - ID Yes NELLIS AFB USAF USA - NV No NIAGARA FALLS ARS USAF USA - NY Yes OFFUTT AFB USAF USA - NE No OSAN AIR BASE USAF South Korea No PATRICK AFB USAF USA - FL Yes 6 of 8 As of February 1, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted PETERSON AFB USAF USA - CO Yes PITTSBURGH ANG USAF USA - PA Yes PITTSBURGH ARS USAF USA - PA Yes RAF LAKENHEATH USAF United Kingdom Yes RAF MILDENHALL USAF United Kingdom Yes RAMSTEIN FRG USAF Germany No ROBINS AFB USAF USA - GA No SCHRIEVER AFB USAF USA - CO Yes SCOTT AFB USAF USA - IL Yes SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB USAF USA - NC Yes SHAW AFB USAF USA - SC No SHEPPARD AFB USAF USA - TX No SPANGDAHLEM AB USAF Germany No TINKER AFB USAF USA - OK No TRAVIS AFB USAF USA - CA Yes TYNDALL AFB USAF USA - FL No USAF ACADEMY USAF USA - CO Yes VANCE AFB USAF USA - OK Yes VANDENBERG AFB USAF USA - CA No WESTOVER ARB AFB USAF USA - MA No WHITEMAN AFB USAF USA - MO Yes WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB USAF USA - OH Yes YOKOTA AB USAF Japan No YOUNGSTOWN JOINT AIR RESERVE USAF USA - OH Yes STATION CHERRY POINT MCAS USMC USA - NC Yes MAKIMINATO OKINAWA CP BUTLER USMC Japan Yes MARINE BARRACKS WASH D.C.
Recommended publications
  • For Commissioner Coyle
    DCN: 12358 For Commissioner Coyle Sir - this is your copy of the Fort Belvoir visit report, which is an addendum to the Fort Monmouth recommendation report. After our visit was completed, the Night Vision Lab sent copies of letters of support, and other papers that they say address questions you asked during the visit. Everything they sent has been included in this package for your perusal as well. They also requested that this report be sent to GEN Hill, but I have not done so yet and I believe that all of the pertinent issues will be covered when we brief all of the commissioners on our analysis. I can forward him a copy, however, if you think it is wise to do so. Please let me know if you have any comments or anything else you want me to get on this issue. Wes Hood SECOND ADDENDUM FORT MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY BASE VISIT REPORT COMMISSIONER VISIT TO THE NIGHT VISION & ELECTRONIC SENSORS DIRECTORATE (COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE NIGHT VISION LAB) 1 LOCATED AT FORT BELVOIR, VA 7 JULY 2005 LEAD COMMISSIONER: Commissioner Philip Coyle CORIRIISSION STAFF: Wesley E. Hood (Army Senior Analyst) LIST OF ATTENDEES: Luanne Obert NVESD-OD Fenner Milton NVESD-OD Aaron LaPointe NVESD-STD COL McCOY NVESD-OD Kelly Sherbondy NVESD-STD Don Reago NVESD-OD CPT Nicole Clark NVESD-OD Bill Jarvis NVESD-OD John Nettleton NVESD-STD Jeanna Tendall Hq AMC Stationing Office Ken Yosuda NVESD-STD Pat Decatur U.S. Army Garrison Fort Belvoir Andy Hetrick NVESD-GCSD Michael Jemings NVESD-SPPD Wayne Antesberger NVESD-GCSD Jim Campbell NVESD-STD Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • FORT BENNING SPONSORSHIP and ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES 1 Let Us Show You How to Reach America’S Finest
    OCTOBER 2019 FORT BENNING SPONSORSHIP AND ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES 1 Let us show you how to reach America’s finest. The U.S. Army, Fort Benning Family and MWR Marketing team can help you secure a measurable return on investment and influential access to well- educated, diverse and financially stable consumers. Be part of something with value, purpose and reward. Align yourselves with something more. Make a meaningful difference. This is your opportunity to do well for those who have done so much. U.S. Army Family and MWR plans, produces, promotes and manages world-class programs for those who serve, including a host of recreation, sports, entertainment, travel and leisure activities. When you join our ranks and reach these coveted target markets with the U.S. Army, Fort Benning, you’ll also directly support exceptional programs for military members and their families. Thousands of military S ervice Members, Retirees and their Families count on our programs to boost their quality of life throughout Fort Benning and the surrounding military community. Here’s how you can help… 2 It’s one thing to plot a course. It’s another to navigate it. Nobody knows how to immerse your brand within the Fort Benning market better than our team. This is our terrain, and our audiences value authenticity and credibility of the brands that partner with us. Our mission is to help your brand develop meaningful and long-lasting relationships with the military consumer market. C reate awareness and visibility through customized marketing opportunities across multiple platforms: • Event sponsorships, Mobile Tour and Turn-key Event Access • Digital advertising (video screens, billboards and websites) • Online P romotions • Pass-through Rights with Military R etail Outlets (the E xchange/DeCA) • R egional, National and Global media exposure 3 2 So you want to reach your target? You’ve come to the right place.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 15, 1996 / Notices 53725
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 15, 1996 / Notices 53725 Department of the Army 30537), which provided notice that the comments are received that would Draft EIS was available for comment. result in a contrary determination. Notice of Availability of the Final Comments from the DEIS have been ADDRESSES: Send comments to General Environmental Impact Statement for considered and responses are included Counsel, Defense Special Weapons the Disposal of Chemical Agents and in this Final EIS. After a 30-day waiting Agency, 6801 Telegraph Road, Munitions Stored at Pine Bluff Arsenal, period the Army will publish a Record Alexandria, VA 22310±3398 Arkansas of Decision. Copies of the Final EIS may FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. be obtained by writing to the following address: Program Manager for Chemical Sandy Barker at (703) 325±7681. ACTION: Notice of availability. Demilitarization, ATTN: SFAE±CD±ME, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SUMMARY: This announces the Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland Defense Special Weapons Agency availability of the Final Environmental 21010±5401. notices for systems of records subject to Impact Statement (FEIS) on the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), construction and operation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as amended, have been published in the proposed chemical agent will also publish a Notice of Availability Federal Register and are available from demilitarization facility at Pine Bluff for the Final EIS in the Federal Register. the address above. Arsenal, Arkansas. The proposed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The proposed amendments are not facility will be used to demilitarize all Above address, or Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Hood AFGE
    2002 Negotiated Agreement Fort Hood “people first – mission always” “Working together Works” AFGE Proud to Make America Work American Federation of Government Employees AFL-CIO Local, 1920 INDEX PREAMBLE 1 ARTICLE 1 EXCLUSIVE RECOGNITION AND COVERAGE OF AGREEMENT 2 ARTICLE 2 PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT 3 ARTICLE 3 SCOPE OF CONSULTATION AND NEGOTIATION 4 ARTICLE 4 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 6 ARTICLE 5 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 7 ARTICLE 6 REPRESENTATION 9 ARTICLE 7 PUBLICITY 11 ARTICLE 8 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 12 ARTICLE 9 LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION 16 ARTICLE 10 HOURS OF WORK 16 ARTICLE 11 OVERTIME 19 ARTICLE 12 HOLIDAYS 20 ARTICLE 13 LEAVE 22 ARTICLE 14 EMPLOYEE PERSONNEL FILES 25 ARTICLE 15 JOB CLASSIFICATION 26 ARTICLE 16 TRAINING 26 ARTICLE 17 REDUCTION IN FORCE, REORGANIZATION, AND/OR TRANSFER OF FUNCTION 27 ARTICLE 18 DISCIPLINARY AND ADVERSE ACTIONS 28 ARTICLE 19 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 30 ARTICLE 20 ARBITRATION 34 ARTICLE 21 HEALTH AND SAFETY 36 ARTICLE 22 ON THE JOB INJURIES 39 ARTICLE 23 DUES WITHHOLDING 41 ARTICLE 24 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (EAP) AND WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PROGRAM (WVP) 43 ARTICLE 25 USE OF OFFICIAL FACILITIES 45 ARTICLE 26 MERIT PROMOTION 46 ARTICLE 27 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 48 ARTICLE 28 EMPLOYEE DEBTS 49 ARTICLE 29 INCENTIVE AWARDS 49 ARTICLE 30 ENVIRONMENTAL DIFFERENTIAL PAY 50 ARTICLE 31 FIREFIGHTERS 51 ARTICLE 32 GENERAL 53 ARTICLE 33 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM 53 ARTICLE 34 PARKING 53 ARTICLE 35 IMPASSES IN NEGOTIATIONS 54 ARTICLE 36 TRAVEL AND PER DIEM 54 ARTICLE 37 SCHEDULED WITHIN-GRADE
    [Show full text]
  • MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G
    MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G. Fast 8 Tactical Intelligence Shortcomings in Iraq: Restructuring Deputy Commanding General Battalion Intelligence to Win Brigadier General Brian A. Keller by Major Bill Benson and Captain Sean Nowlan Deputy Commandant for Futures Jerry V. Proctor Director of Training Development 16 Measuring Anti-U.S. Sentiment and Conducting Media and Support Analysis in The Republic of Korea (ROK) Colonel Eileen M. Ahearn by Major Daniel S. Burgess Deputy Director/Dean of Training Development and Support 24 Army’s MI School Faces TRADOC Accreditation Russell W. Watson, Ph.D. by John J. Craig Chief, Doctrine Division Stephen B. Leeder 25 USAIC&FH Observations, Insights, and Lessons Learned Managing Editor (OIL) Process Sterilla A. Smith by Dee K. Barnett, Command Sergeant Major (Retired) Editor Elizabeth A. McGovern 27 Brigade Combat Team (BCT) Intelligence Operations Design Director SSG Sharon K. Nieto by Michael A. Brake Associate Design Director and Administration 29 North Korean Special Operations Forces: 1996 Kangnung Specialist Angiene L. Myers Submarine Infiltration Cover Photographs: by Major Harry P. Dies, Jr. Courtesy of the U.S. Army Cover Design: 35 Deconstructing The Theory of 4th Generation Warfare Specialist Angiene L. Myers by Del Stewart, Chief Warrant Officer Three (Retired) Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelli- gence Center and Fort Huachuca (USAIC&FH) publishes the Military DEPARTMENTS Intelligence Professional Bulle- tin quarterly under provisions of AR 2 Always Out Front 58 Language Action 25-30. MIPB disseminates mate- rial designed to enhance individu- 3 CSM Forum 60 Professional Reader als’ knowledge of past, current, and emerging concepts, doctrine, materi- 4 Technical Perspective 62 MIPB 2004 Index al, training, and professional develop- ments in the MI Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives
    Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists Volume 9 Article 5 Number 1 Issue 1 and 2 January 1991 Short Subjects: The nitU ed States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives in Georgia Kathryn R. Coker United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon Archives Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance Part of the Archival Science Commons Recommended Citation Coker, Kathryn R., "Short Subjects: The nitU ed States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives in Georgia," Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists 9 no. 1 (1991) . Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact digitalcommons@kennesaw.edu. 66 PROVEW\NCE/Spring-Fall 1991 SHORT SUBJECTS Features The US Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Miiitary Archives In Georgia Kathyrn R. Coker Introduction There's a relatively new "kid" archives on the block. It's called the U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon Archives located in Augusta, Georgia. Augusta is not only the home of the Masters Golf Tournament but also the PROVENANCE, Vol. IX, Nos. 1-2, Spring-Fall 1991 67 home of the U.S. Army Signal Corps, the army's communicators since 1860. Authorization The United
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Fort Hood: Improving Our Ability to Connect the Dots
    LESSONS FROM FORT HOOD: IMPROVING OUR ABILITY TO CONNECT THE DOTS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 Serial No. 112–118 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 81–127 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY PETER T. KING, New York, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California LORETTA SANCHEZ, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas HENRY CUELLAR, Texas GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia LAURA RICHARDSON, California CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois TIM WALBERG, Michigan BRIAN HIGGINS, New York CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana JOE WALSH, Illinois HANSEN CLARKE, Michigan PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts BEN QUAYLE, Arizona KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL, New York SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia JANICE HAHN, California BILLY LONG, Missouri RON BARBER, Arizona JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas ROBERT L. TURNER, New York MICHAEL J. RUSSELL, Staff Director/Chief Counsel KERRY ANN WATKINS, Senior Policy Director MICHAEL S. TWINCHEK, Chief Clerk I. LANIER AVANT, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT MICHAEL T.
    [Show full text]
  • Impersonal Names Index Listing for the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository, 2010
    Description of document: US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) Impersonal Names Index Listing for the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository, 2010 Requested date: 07-August-2010 Released date: 15-August-2010 Posted date: 23-August-2010 Title of document Impersonal Names Index Listing Source of document: Commander U.S. Army Intelligence & Security Command Freedom of Information/Privacy Office ATTN: IAMG-C-FOI 4552 Pike Road Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-5995 Fax: (301) 677-2956 Note: The IMPERSONAL NAMES index represents INSCOM investigative files that are not titled with the name of a person. Each item in the IMPERSONAL NAMES index represents a file in the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository. You can ask for a copy of the file by contacting INSCOM. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source.
    [Show full text]
  • BAC Grad List
    Last Name First Name Maiden Name Gender City State Class Year Aaron Troy Male Katy TX 2007 Aaron Devonte' Male Lake Charles LA 2018 Aaron Linda Female Lake Charles LA 2006 Abdul-Khaliq Amahl Male Lake Charles LA 2010 Abel Adrienne Moore Female Lake Arthur LA 2004 Abolarin Olaolu Male Houston TX 2013 Abraham Crystal Charles Female Lake Charles LA 2008 Abraham Hilda Simon Female Jennings LA 1997 Abram Jimmy Male Lake Charles LA 2003 Abram Monica Lewis Female Lake Charles LA 2005 Adams Cieltia Female Bossier City LA 2001 Adams Lacey Female New Iberia LA 2015 Adams Megan Female Lake Charles LA 2017 Adcock Albertha Joseph Female Lake Charles LA 2007 Adeosun Anthony Male Lake Charles LA 2013 Adrian David Male Baton Rouge LA 2012 Agada Arinze Male Houston TX 2014 Agwanihu MaryAnn Ngozi Female Beaumont TX 2000 Alawoya Babatunde Male Lake Charles LA 2011 Albert Lynda Thomas Female Lake Charles LA 1987 Albert Pearl Female Lake Charles LA 1980 Alex Candice Female Jeanerette LA 2005 Alex Victor Male Lake Charles LA 1990 Alexander Edward Male Lake Charles LA 1989 Alexander Gabriel Male Houma LA 2016 Alexander Jarian Male Lake Charles LA 2016 Alexander Ka'Yanna Female Lafayette LA 2017 Alexander Brandon Male Iowa LA 2018 Alexander Paula Female Breaux Bridge LA 2019 Alexander Taylor Finchum Female Lake Charles LA 2014 Alexander Nette Batiste Female Plaquemine LA 1992 Alexander Sheryl Female Crowley LA 2011 Alexander Shatamia Female Youngsville LA 2009 Alexander Leticia Harry Female Beaumont TX 1994 Alexander Edriena Papillio Female Lake Charles LA 1985
    [Show full text]
  • Ms. Tamara G. Payne Deputy Garrison Commander for ASA Fort Eustis U.S
    Biography Department of the Army Ms. Tamara G. Payne Deputy Garrison Commander for ASA Fort Eustis U.S. Army Installation Management Command Joint Base Langley - Eustis, VA Ms. Tamara Payne serves as the Deputy Garrison Commander of ASA Fort Eustis, part of the Joint Base Langley- Eustis command. She is responsible for providing leadership and management of installation service delivery, performance management, business planning, and analysis on a joint base community servicing Army, Air Force and Navy servicemen and women, civilians their families and the surrounding communities. Prior to this assignment, Ms. Payne served as the IMCOM Training, Deputy Chief, Plans and Ops, Chief of Analysis and Integration and the IMCOM Central Region Installation Support lead for two of the largest installations in the Army, Fort Bliss and White Sands Missile Range, the largest Army Reserve Installation of Fort Hunter Liggett and Reserve Forces Training Area Parks. She was also dual hatted as the Chief of Plans Analysis and Integration and Transformation Office at USAG Ansbach, where she planned and led installation restructure and receipt of the Army’s first rotational aviation brigade. She has stood up and led two transformation offices, responsible for integration and planning of installation and mission initiatives in support of region-wide efforts such as the Aviation Restructure Initiative, Camp Humphreys Transformation and Yongsan Relocation Program. Throughout her civilian career she provided installation governance, transformation, strategic planning and integrated support to Soldiers, Civilians and their families at eight (8) installations across four (4) regions. She served in the United States Army as an intelligence analyst primarily focused on Persian Area studies and crypto-linguistics.
    [Show full text]