DOCSLIB.ORG

US Army Organizational Codes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US Army Organizational Codes Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: ARMY0 Lvl Org Code and Description 1 USARMY United States Army 2 0100000 IMCOM Pacific Regional Office 3 01AK001 Fort Greely 4 01AK001FES Fort Greely FES 4 01AK001NR Fort Greely NR 3 01AK002 Fort Wainwright 4 01AK002FES Fort Wainwright FES 4 01AK002NR Fort Wainwright NR 3 01HI001 USAG Schofield 4 01HI001FES USAG Schofield FES 4 01HI001NR USAG Schofield NR 3 01HI002 USAG Hawaii PTA 4 01HI002FES USAG Hawaii PTA FES 4 01HI002NR USAG Hawaii PTA NR 2 0200000 IMCOM West Regional Office 3 02AZ001 Ft. Huachuca 4 02AZ001FES Ft. Huachuca FES 4 02AZ001NR Ft. Huachuca NR 3 02AZ002 Yuma Proving Ground 4 02AZ002FES Yuma Proving Ground FES 4 02AZ002NR Yuma Proving Ground NR 3 02CA001 Camp Parks 4 02CA001FES Camp Parks FES 4 02CA001NR Camp Parks NR 3 02CA002 Ft. Hunter Liggett 4 02CA002FES Ft. Hunter Liggett FES 4 02CA002NR Ft. Hunter Liggett NR 3 02CA003 Ft. Irwin 4 02CA003FES Ft. Irwin FES 4 02CA003NR Ft. Irwin NR 3 02CA004 Persidio Mont. 4 02CA004FES Persidio Mont. FES 4 02CA004NR Persidio Mont. NR 3 02CA005 Shape Army Depot 4 02CA005FES Shape Army Depot FES 4 02CA005NR Shape Army Depot NR 3 02CA006 Military Ocean Terminal Concord 4 02CA006FES Military Ocean Terminal Concord FES 4 02CA006NR Military Ocean Terminal Concord NR 3 02CA007 Sierra Army Depot 4 02CA007FES Sierra Army Depot FES 4 02CA007NR Sierra Army Depot NR 3 02NV001 Hawthorne Army Depot 4 02NV001FES Hawthorne Army Depot FES 4 02NV001NR Hawthorne Army Depot NR 3 02UT001 Dugway Proving Ground 4 02UT001FES Dugway Proving Ground FES 4 02UT001NR Dugway Proving Ground NR 3 02UT002 Tooele Army Depot 4 02UT002FES Tooele Army Depot FES Page Nbr: 1 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 07/01/19 08:39 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: ARMY0 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 02UT002NR Tooele Army Depot NR 3 02WA001 Yakima Trng Cntr 4 02WA001FES Yakima Trng Cntr FES 4 02WA001NR Yakima Trng Cntr NR 3 02WA002 JB Lewis McCord 4 02WA002FES JB Lewis McCord FES 4 02WA002NR JB Lewis McCord NR 2 0300000 IMCOM Midwest Regional Office 3 03CO001 Pinyon Canyon 4 03CO001FES Pinyon Canyon FES 4 03CO001NR Pinyon Canyon NR 3 03CO002 Pueblo Chemical Depot 4 03CO002FES Pueblo Chemical Depot FES 4 03CO002NR Pueblo Chemical Depot NR 3 03CO003 Fort Carson 4 03CO003FES Fort Carson FES 4 03CO003NR Fort Carson NR 3 03KS001 Fort Riley 4 03KS001FES Fort Riley FES 4 03KS001NR Fort Riley NR 3 03KS002 Fort Leavenworth 4 03KS002FES Fort Leavenworth FES 4 03KS002NR Fort Leavenworth NR 3 03NM001 White Sands MR 4 03NM001FES White Sands MR FES 4 03NM001NR White Sands MR NR 3 03OK001 Fort Sill 4 03OK001FES Fort Sill FES 4 03OK001NR Fort Sill NR 3 03OK002 McAlester Army Ammunition Plant 4 03OK002FES McAlester Army Ammunition Plant FES 4 03OK002NR Mcalester Army Ammunition Plant NR 3 03TX001 Fort Bliss 4 03TX001FES Fort Bliss FES 4 03TX001NR Fort Bliss NR 3 03TX002 Fort Hood 4 03TX002FES Fort Hood FES 4 03TX002NR Fort Hood NR 3 03TX003 Corpus Christi Army Depot 4 03TX003FES Corpus Christi Army Depot FES 4 03TX003NR Corpus Christi Army Depot NR 3 03TX004 Red River Army Depot 4 03TX004FES Red River Army Depot FES 4 03TX004NR Red River Army Depot NR 2 0400000 IMCOM Southeast Regional Office 3 04AL001 Fort Rucker 4 04AL001FES Fort Rucker FES 4 04AL001NR Fort Rucker NR 3 04AL002 Redstone Arsenal 4 04AL002FES Redstone Arsenal FES Page Nbr: 2 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 07/01/19 08:39 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: ARMY0 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 04AL002NR Redstone Arsenal NR 3 04AL003 Anniston Army Depot 4 04AL003FES Anniston Army Depot FES 4 04AL003NR Anniston Army Depot NR 3 04AR001 Pine Bluff Arsenal 4 04AR001FES Pine Bluff Arsenal FES 4 04AR001NR Pine Bluff Arsenal NR 3 04FL001 USAG Miami 4 04FL001FES USAG Miami FES 4 04FL002NR USAG Miami NR 3 04GA001 Fort Gordon 4 04GA001FES Fort Gordon FES 4 04GA001NR Fort Gordon NR 3 04GA002 Fort Stewart 4 04GA002FES Fort Stewart FES 4 04GA002NR Fort Stewart NR 3 04GA004 Fort Benning 4 04GA004FES Fort Benning FES 4 04GA004NR Fort Benning NR 3 04LA000 Fort Polk 4 04LA001FES Fort Polk FES 4 04LA002NR Fort Polk NR 3 04NC001 Fort Bragg 4 04NC001FES Fort Bragg FES 4 04NC002NR Fort Bragg NR 3 04PR001 Fort Buchanan 4 04PR001FES Fort Buchanan FES 4 04PR002NR Fort Buchanan NR 3 04SC001 Fort Jackson 4 04SC001FES Fort Jackson FES 4 04SC002NR Fort Jackson NR 3 05NC002 Military Ocean Terminal Sunny Point 4 05NC001FES Military Ocean Terminal Sunny Point FES 4 05NC001NR Military Ocean Terminal Sunny Point NR 2 0500000 IMCOM Northeast Regional Office 3 05IA001 Iowa Army Ammunition Plant 4 05IA001FES Iowa Army Ammunition Plant FES 4 05IA001NR Iowa Army Ammunition Plant NR 3 05IL001 Rock Island Arsenal 4 05IL001FES Rock Island Arsenal FES 4 05IL001NR Rock Island Arsenal NR 3 05IN001 Crane Army Ammunition Activity 4 05IN001FES Crane Army Ammunition Activity FES 4 05IN001NR Crane Army Ammunition Activity NR 3 05KY001 Fort Campbell 4 05KY001FES Fort Campbell FES 4 05KY001NR Fort Campbell NR 3 05KY002 Fort Knox 4 05KY002FES Fort Knox FES 4 05KY002NR Fort Knox NR Page Nbr: 3 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 07/01/19 08:39 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: ARMY0 Lvl Org Code and Description 3 05KY003 Blue Grass Army Depot 4 05KY003FES Blue Grass Army Depot FES 4 05KY003NR Blue Grass Army Depot NR 3 05MA001 Fort Devens 4 05MA001FES Fort Devens FES 4 05MA001NR Fort Devens NR 3 05MA002 Natick (NSSC) 4 05MA002FES Natick (NSSC) FES 4 05MA002NR Natick (NSSC) NR 3 05MD001 Aberdeen Proving Ground 4 05MD001FES Aberdeen Proving Ground FES 4 05MD001NR Aberdeen Proving Ground NR 3 05MD002 Adelphi (US Army Laboratory) 4 05MD002FES Adelphi (US Army Laboratory) FES 4 05MD002NR Adelphi (US Army Laboratory) NR 3 05MD003 Fort Detrick 4 05MD003FES Fort Detrick FES 4 05MD003NR Fort Detrick NR 3 05MD004 Fort Meade 4 05MD004FES Fort Meade FES 4 05MD004NR Fort Meade NR 3 05MI001 Detroit Arsenal 4 05MI001FES Detroit Arsenal FES 4 05MI001NR Detroit Arsenal NR 3 05MO001 Fort Leonard Wood 4 05MO001FES Fort Leonard Wood FES 4 05MO001NR Fort Leonard Wood NR 3 05MO002 Lake City Army Ammunition Plant 4 05MO002FES Lake City Army Ammunition Plant FES 4 05MO002NR Lake City Army Ammunition Plant NR 3 05NJ001 Picatinny Arsenal 4 05NJ001FES Picatinny Arsenal NES 4 05NJ001NR Picatinny Arsenal NR 3 05NY001 Fort Drum 4 05NY001FES Fort Drum FES 4 05NY001NR Fort Drum NR 3 05NY002 Fort Hamilton 4 05NY002FES Fort Hamilton FES 4 05NY002NR Fort Hamilton NR 3 05NY003 West Point 4 05NY003FES West Point FES 4 05NY003NR West Point NR 3 05NY004 Watervliet Arsenal 4 05NY004FES Watervliet Arsenal FES 4 05NY004NR Watervliet Arsenal NR 3 05OH001 JSMC - LIMA 4 05OH001FES JSMC - LIMA FES 4 05OH001NR JSMC - LIMA NR 3 05PA001 Carlisle Barracks 4 05PA001FES Carlisle Barracks FES Page Nbr: 4 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 07/01/19 08:39 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: ARMY0 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 05PA001NR Carlisle Barracks NR 3 05PA002 Letterkenny Army Depot 4 05PA002FES Letterkenny Army Depot FES 4 05PA002NR Letterkenny Army Depot NR 3 05PA003 Tobyhanna Army Depot 4 05PA003FES Tobyhanna Army Depot FES 4 05PA003NR Tobyhanna Army Depot NR 3 05PA004 Scranton Army Ammunition Plant 4 05PA004FES Scranton Army Ammunition Plant FES 4 05PA004NR Scranton Army Ammunition Plant NR 3 05TN001 Holston Army Ammunition Plant 4 05TN001FES Holston Army Ammunition Plant FES 4 05TN001NR Holston Army Ammunition Plant NR 3 05TN002 Milan Army Ammunition Plant 4 05TN002FES Milan Army Ammunition Plant FES 4 05TN002NR Milan Army Ammunition Plant NR 3 05VA001 Fort AP Hill 4 05VA001FES Fort AP Hill FES 4 05VA001NR Fort AP Hill NR 3 05VA002 Fort Belvoir 4 05VA002FES Fort Belvoir FES 4 05VA002NR Fort Belvoir NR 3 05VA003 Fort Lee 4 05VA003FES Fort Lee FES 4 05VA003NR Fort Lee NR 3 05VA004 Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall 4 05VA004FES Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall FES 4 05VA004NR Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall NR 3 05VA005 Radford Army Ammunition Plant 4 05VA005FES Radford Army Ammunition Plant FES 4 05VA005NR Radford Army Ammunition Plant NR 3 05WI001 Fort McCoy 4 05WI001FES Fort McCoy FES 4 05WI001NR Fort McCoy NR Page Nbr: 5 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 07/01/19 08:39 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Texas Military Preparedness Commission Biennial Report Table of Contents
    Texas Military Preparedness Commission Biennial Report Table of Contents 2 Letter to the Governor 3 Executive Summary 4 The Defense Economy and Texas Highlights 6 The Commission Mission & Strategies Commissioners Ex-Officio Members Staff & Interns Funding Programs, Texas Military Value Revolving Loan Fund (TMVRLF) Funding Programs, Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant (DEAAG) Texas Military Value Task Force (TMVTF) Governor’s Committee to Support the Military (GCSM) 16 Texas Commander’s Council, Recommendations 18 State Defense Legislation 21 Military Installations in Texas: Overview and Economic Impact 22 Economic Impact: Methodology and Disclaimers 24 Economic Impact Map 25 U.S. Air Force Installations Dyess Air Force Base Goodfellow Air Force Base Laughlin Air Force Base Sheppard Air Force Base 34 U.S. Army Installations & Army Futures Command Corpus Christi Army Depot Fort Bliss Fort Hood Red River Army Depot Army Futures Command 45 U.S. Navy Installations Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth Naval Air Station Kingsville 52 Joint Base San Antonio & Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base 57 Texas Military Forces Air National Guard Army National Guard Texas State Guard 62 Resources: Wind Energy and Military Operations 64 Resources: Maps Cover photo courtesy of U.S. Army/ By Capt. Roxana Thompson 1 Letter to the Governor Dear Governor Abbott: On behalf of the Texas Military Preparedness Commission (TMPC), I am pleased to submit to you the 2019-2020 TMPC Biennial Report. It has been an eventful two years since our last biennial report to you. The military continues to grow in their missions as Texas seeks opportunities to continue being the best home to military personnel in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • The African American Soldier at Fort Huachuca, Arizona, 1892-1946
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Anthropology, Department of 2-2001 The African American Soldier At Fort Huachuca, Arizona, 1892-1946 Steven D. Smith University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/anth_facpub Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info Published in 2001. © 2001, University of South Carolina--South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology This Book is brought to you by the Anthropology, Department of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE AFRICAN AMERICAN SOLDIER AT FORT HUACHUCA, ARIZONA, 1892-1946 The U.S Army Fort Huachuca, Arizona, And the Center of Expertise for Preservation of Structures and Buildings U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Seattle, Washington THE AFRICAN AMERICAN SOLDIER AT FORT HUACHUCA, ARIZONA, 1892-1946 By Steven D. Smith South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology University of South Carolina Prepared For: U.S. Army Fort Huachuca, Arizona And the The Center of Expertise for Preservation of Historic Structures & Buildings, U.S. Army Corps of Engineer, Seattle District Under Contract No. DACW67-00-P-4028 February 2001 ABSTRACT This study examines the history of African American soldiers at Fort Huachuca, Arizona from 1892 until 1946. It was during this period that U.S. Army policy required that African Americans serve in separate military units from white soldiers. All four of the United States Congressionally mandated all-black units were stationed at Fort Huachuca during this period, beginning with the 24th Infantry and following in chronological order; the 9th Cavalry, the 10th Cavalry, and the 25th Infantry.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook
    USAMRIID’s MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES HANDBOOK Sixth Edition April 2005 U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES FORT DETRICK FREDERICK, MARYLAND Emergency Response Numbers National Response Center: 1-800-424-8802 or (for chem/bio hazards & terrorist events) 1-202-267-2675 National Domestic Preparedness Office: 1-202-324-9025 (for civilian use) Domestic Preparedness Chem/Bio Helpline: 1-410-436-4484 or (Edgewood Ops Center – for military use) DSN 584-4484 USAMRIID’s Emergency Response Line: 1-888-872-7443 CDC'S Emergency Response Line: 1-770-488-7100 Handbook Download Site An Adobe Acrobat Reader (pdf file) version of this handbook can be downloaded from the internet at the following url: http://www.usamriid.army.mil USAMRIID’s MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES HANDBOOK Sixth Edition April 2005 Lead Editor Lt Col Jon B. Woods, MC, USAF Contributing Editors CAPT Robert G. Darling, MC, USN LTC Zygmunt F. Dembek, MS, USAR Lt Col Bridget K. Carr, MSC, USAF COL Ted J. Cieslak, MC, USA LCDR James V. Lawler, MC, USN MAJ Anthony C. Littrell, MC, USA LTC Mark G. Kortepeter, MC, USA LTC Nelson W. Rebert, MS, USA LTC Scott A. Stanek, MC, USA COL James W. Martin, MC, USA Comments and suggestions are appreciated and should be addressed to: Operational Medicine Department Attn: MCMR-UIM-O U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5011 PREFACE TO THE SIXTH EDITION The Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook, which has become affectionately known as the "Blue Book," has been enormously successful - far beyond our expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Days at Fort Snelling
    Library of Congress Early days at Fort Snelling. 420 EARLY DAYS AT FORT SNELLING. Previous to the organization of the Territory of Minnesota, in 1849, Fort Snelling was the only place of note beyond Prairie du Chien. For years it had been the point at which the missionary of the Cross, the man of science, the adventurous trader, made preparations for their journeys among the villages of the wandering Dakotas. Beautifully located on an elevated bluff, at the junction of the Minnesota and Mississippi, its massive walls make a strong impression on the mind of the traveler. Within its enclosure have been quartered some of the most efficient officers of the United States Army, who have received with hospitality the various scientific expeditions that have from time to time passed through the country. Its history and associations are full of interest and worthy of record in the Annals of Minnesota. On the island in front of the Fort, Pike encamped, and entered into negotiations for the site of the present Fort, as the extracts from his journal, published in a previous chapter show. In 1817, Major Long , in a report to the War Department, recommended the site for a permanent Fort. In 1819, three hundred men of the Sixth regiment, under the command of Colonel Leavenworth , left Detroit, for the purpose of commanding the Fort. They came by the way of Green Bay and Prairie du Chien. At this point a detachment was left, and the remainder ascended the Mississippi. On the 17th of September, they established a cantonment, on the South side of the Minnesota, at the present ferry.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Amended June 6, 2005
    2005 BRAC Commission Schedule Base Closure and Realignment Commission PRESS RELEASE Amended June 6, 2005 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Robert McCreary Deputy Director of Communications 703 – 699 – 2964 [email protected] 26 MAY 2005 BRAC Commissioners Release Schedule for Installation Visits Arlington, Virginia, May 26, 2005—Today the 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission is releasing the schedule for the Commissioners’ visits to major bases recommended for closure or realignment by the Department of Defense (DoD). Chairman Principi stated, “The 2005 BRAC Commission is not going to serve as a rubber stamp; we will look at the DoD recommendations carefully and closely to see if they complied with, or substantially deviated from, the selection criteria and force structure against which all bases are to be measured.” “We have been given the mandate to provide an independent, fair, and equitable assessment and evaluation of both the DoD BRAC proposal and the data and methodology used to develop that proposal,” the Chairman remarked. “My Commissioners and I have pledged to provide that assessment openly and transparently.” The Commissioners plan to visit military installations which have been recommended by DoD to lose either 300 civilian jobs, or a total of 400 civilian and military jobs. The fact-finding visits will involve briefings by base representatives as well as tours of facilities and will be conducted for the primary purpose of determining the military value of the installations. Although military value will be the primary basis for the decision to close or realign a military facility, the Commission was created to also take into account the economic, environmental, and other effects the closure or realignment of a base would have on the surrounding community.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD
    Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD FACT SHEET as of February 2018 Background: Fort Detrick encompasses approximately 1,200 acres divided among three areas in Frederick, Md. Area A is the largest, comprised of approximately 800 acres, and the primary area of construction activity. Most of the Fort Detrick facilities, tenants, post housing, and community facilities are located in Area A. The Forest Glen Annex, Silver Spring, Md., also falls under the operational control of Fort Detrick. The current Corps of Engineers design/construction program on Fort Detrick is approximately $724 million, featuring the $678-million U.S. Army Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) Replacement project, the only Department of Defense high-containment biological laboratory. Fort Detrick, originally named Camp Detrick until 1956, was established in 1931 as a military training airfield named after Maj. Frederick Detrick, a squadron surgeon. In 1943, the U.S. Biological Laboratories were established, pioneering efforts in decontamination, gaseous sterilization and agent purification. In 1969, Fort Detrick’s biological warfare research center mission was terminated and 69 acres of the installation were transferred to the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct cancer research. The installation has now matured into a multi-interagency campus (four cabinet level tenants) focusing on advanced bio-medical research and development, medical materiel management, and long-haul telecommunications for the White House, Department of Defense, and other governmental agencies. The National Interagency Biodefense Campus (NIBC) is currently the focal point of all activities on the installation, and the new USAMRIID project is the cornerstone of the campus. Names and phone numbers for significant installation points of contact are as follows: Congressional Rep (D-6th) John Delaney Congressional Rep (D-8th) Jamie Raskin Installation/MRMC Commander MG Barbara R.
    [Show full text]
  • (WESTON) History of Working at DOD Facilities Within Pennsylvania
    Weston Solutions, Inc. (WESTON) Successful History of Working at DOD Facilities within Pennsylvania •WESTON is local PA firm with Corporate Office in West Chester, PA •Established in 1957, more than 500 employees in PA • Over 30 years of RI/FS experience under CERCLA •Letterkenny Army Depot (Chambersburg, PA) •Working at installation from 1989 to present with PADEP, EPA and the Army •Various environmental projects from SI, RI, FS through removals. •Tobyhanna Army Depot (Tobyhanna, PA) •Working at installation from 1996 to present with PADEP, EPA and the Army •Various environmental projects including munitions projects. •Tobyhanna Artillery Range Formerly Used Defense Site (Tobyhanna, PA) •Working at site from 2003 to present with PADEP, EPA and the Army •Conducted RI/FS and numerous removal actions for munitions •Fort Indiantown Gap (Annville, PA) •Working at site from 2003 to present with PADEP, EPA and the Army •Conducted various environmental projects, site assessments, RI, and removals •Defense Distribution Supply Point (Harrisburg, PA) •Working at site from 1994 to present with PADEP, EPA, and the Army •Various environmental projects from SI, RI, FS through removals. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA) and Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) Flow Chart Preliminary Site Remedial Feasibility CERCLA Assessment Inspection Investigation Study Evaluate Alternatives Needing Characterize Site, GOALS Identify Releases &Identify Further Risk Assessment Investigation Preferred Remedy Note CERCLA activities after RI Current Stage of MMRP Work contingent upon risk evaluation Contracted to WESTON Proposed Public Decision Remedial Remedial Plan Comment Document Design Action Propose Design/Work Implement Public Authorize Selected Plan for Chosen Participation Selected Remedy Remedy Remedy Remedy MMRP Remedial Investigation Fieldwork Objective is to characterize nature and extent of munitions and explosives of concern (MEC) to determine if remediation is needed based on risk.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise History of Fort Monmouth, New Jersey and the U.S
    A CONCISE HISTORY OF FORT MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY AND THE U.S. ARMY CECOM LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND Prepared by the Staff of the CECOM LCMC Historical Office U.S. Army CECOM Life Cycle Management Command Fort Monmouth, New Jersey Fall 2009 Design and Layout by CTSC Visual Information Services, Myer Center Fort Monmouth, New Jersey Visit our Website: www.monmouth.army.mil/historian/ When asked to explain a loyalty that time had not been able to dim, one of the Camp Vail veterans said shyly, "The place sort of gets into your blood, especially when you have seen it grow from nothing into all this. It keeps growing and growing, and you want to be part of its growing pains." Many of the local communities have become very attached to Fort Monmouth because of the friendship instilled...not for just a war period but for as long as...Fort Monmouth...will inhabit Monmouth County. - From “A Brief History of the Beginnings of the Fort Monmouth Radio Laboratories,” Rebecca Klang, 1942 FOREWORD The name “Monmouth” has been synonymous with the defense of freedom since our country’s inception. Scientists, engineers, program managers, and logisticians here have delivered technological breakthroughs and advancements to our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen for almost a century. These innovations have included the development of FM radio and radar, bouncing signals off the moon to prove the feasibility of extraterrestrial radio communication, the use of homing pigeons through the late-1950s, frequency hopping tactical radios, and today’s networking capabilities supporting our troops in Overseas Contingency Operations.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update
    As of May 17, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 2: Director of Administration and Management (DA&M), the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the DA&M, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilians between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memorandum on the conditions- based approach to personnel movement and travel dated March 15, 2021. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 202 of 230 Installations (88%) (Met: Step 1 & Step 2) Of the 202 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 0 reinstated travel restrictions while 6 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of May 17, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD Yes ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL Yes BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany Yes CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea Yes CAMP DODGE Army USA - IA Yes CAMP HENRY Army South Korea Yes CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea Yes CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan No CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA Yes DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI No FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA Yes FORT BENNING Army USA - GA Yes FORT BLISS Army USA - TX No FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC Yes FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO Yes FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI Yes FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD Yes FORT DRUM Army USA - NY Yes FORT GEORGE G.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Indians Came to Carlisle
    HOW THE INDIANS CAME TO CARLISLE By Louis MORTON* L ATE on the night of October 6, 1879, the townspeople of Car- L lisle, Pennsylvania, began to gather at the railroad junction just east of the town. Impatiently the crowd awaited the arrival of the train. Aboard were no distinguished passengers, only about 100 Indian boys and girls from some of the fiercest tribes in the West. For many of the townsmen, it would be their first sight of real Indians, but it was more than curiosity that had brought theni out so late that brisk fall night. These Indians were no passing side-show. They had come to live at Carlisle, at the old military barracks where a school for Indians was to be formed. The train was bringing in the first class.' From this beginning grew the famed Indian School at Carlisle. For almost forty years the school prospered, attracting wide atten- tion and strong support from friends of the red man, to fall at last a fatality to World War I, when it was converted into an Army hospital.t Its students, numbering in the thousands, took back to their people a better understanding of the white man's civilization; its great athletes swept all opposition before them and left in their wake a string of broken records and a host of anecdotes. To Carlisle the school brought fame and a golden era it still recalls nostalgically. But all this lay in the future that night when the townsmen greeted the bewildered and sleepy Indian children who descended from the train at midnight to begin the long weary march to their new home.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortfort Leelee
    UnitedUnited StatesStates ArmyArmy CombinedCombined ArmsArms SupportSupport CommandCommand andand FortFort LeeLee 1 COL John Angevine, IMNE-LEE-G, [email protected]; 804/734-7188; DSN 687 241200Jun05 Agenda 0830 Arrive Garrison HQS Building 8000 0830 – 0840 En route to CASCOM – COL Angevine/Mrs. Lee 0845 – 0900 Office Call with CG - MG Dunwoody 0900 - 0905 Welcome and Introductions – COL Angevine 0905 – 0915 BRAC Team Visit – COL (Ret) Dinsick 0915 – 1000 Fort Lee Background Briefing – COL Angevine 1000 - 1045 CSS Center of Excellence Concept Briefing – COL Mullins 1045 – 1115 Break and pick up lunch 1115 – 1200 Review of BRAC Recommendations and Impacts – Mrs. Lee 1200 – 1300 BRAC Construction Requirements – Mr. Greg White, DPWL 1300 – 1400 Logistics Warrior Training – Mr. Don Bradshaw, DPTMS 1400 - Questions & Answers 2 FOCUS Installation Responsibilities Community Impact Current Missions/Functions Current Facilities/Infrastructure/Infostructure Fort Lee 2020 Quality of Life Future Mission Capability 3 Population • Active duty permanent party – Officers 580 – Enlisted 2585 • Civilians 3182 • Contractors 1330 • Family members – On-post 3197 – Off-post 2371 • Retirees, survivors & family On an average day, members 55,220 there are over 20,000 People • Student Average Annual on Fort Lee! Load Over 35,000 4 Workforce Diversity Fort Lee is the model employer with a diverse and effective work force incorporating the principles of equitable treatment and equal employment opportunity as integral parts of its mission. Our workforce mirrors
    [Show full text]
  • November 25, 1974 3:20 P
    File scanned from the National Security Adviser's Memoranda of Conversation Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library ,I} \ > MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON ~ /SENSITIVE/XGDS MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION PARTICIPANTS: President Ford James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense Lt. General Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs DATE AND TIME: Monday, November 25, 1974 3:20 p. m. PLACE: The Oval Office The White House SUBJECTS: Vladivostok SALT Accord: Base Closings Schlesinger: The Soviets have met their match. They are night people and they usually wear Americans out. You can keep up with them. President: I think we had a good serious meeting and I think the results are such that we can ••• Schlesinger: Your accomplishments on this one are phenomenal. President: I am glad to hear it. If we are criticized I think it will be by the left. The figures are higher than we would like, but it puts a rigid ceiling and makes them modify their program and gives us flexibility. For launchers it is a limit of 2,400; for MIRV'd launchers it is 1,320. There will be no new sites. Missiles on bombers, if they have a range of over 600 kilometers, are counted as launchers. That is it. DEClASSIFIED E.O. 12958 (as amended) SEC 3.3 Schlesinger: Is there freedom to mix? MR# -'1,8-",' • leo t>5b~ 1.R:tlorr,· "A..u.... .3lniloi Iliftk ~ ":10"0 President: Yes. 8v ~.JtARA. Date 10 Is-I, 0 S~SENsrrIVE/XGDS SEC RET - X,-,J3 (.) o .~LASSIEJED> BY; HENRY A.
    [Show full text]