Canmap® Rail
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reporting Marks
Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR -
RÉSEAU FERROVIAIRE QUÉBÉCOIS Clermont ÎLE D’ORLÉANS RÉSEAU FERROVIAIRE QUÉBÉCOIS 368
Mont- Wright Fire Lake Scheffer KLTR Baie James ville Tracé de 1927 du Conseil privé Schefferville (non définitif) HIÉRARCHISATION DU RÉSEAU FERROVIAIRE QUÉBÉCOIS Clermont ÎLE D’ORLÉANS RÉSEAU FERROVIAIRE QUÉBÉCOIS 368 73 CFC AMIC Grandes compagnies de chemin de fer Chemins de fer d’entreprise 40 440 T racé de 1927 du Conseil privé Hedley Sainte- 2 1 TFT CFCP COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER CANADIEN PACIFIQUE AMIC ARCELORMITTAL INFRASTRUCTURE CANADA s.e.n.c. Pétronille Beaumont Love 573 132 CN COMPAGNIE DES CHEMINS DE FER NATIONAUX DU CANADA CFA COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER ARNAUD 2 CFCP CNCFQG Limoilou (non définitif) 740 2 1 L’Ancienne- QUÉBEC LÉVIS 20 Réservoir (CANADIEN NATIONAL) CFRS LA COMPAGNIE DU CHEMIN DE FER ROBERVAL-SAGUENAY Lorette Allenby 2 CFQG CN Smallwood CN (CFILINQ) CHEMIN DE FER D’INTÉRÊT LOCAL INTERNE DU NORD DU QUÉBEC QNSL COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER DU LITTORAL NORD DE QUÉBEC Saint- CN Esker 2 2 CSXT TRANSPORT CSX INC. ET DU LABRADOR INC. Pont-RougeHenri IV Sacrement Anse-au- 40 Foulon Réservoir 2 1 Donnacona VIA VIA RAIL CANADA INC. RTFT RIO TINTO FER ET TITANE INC. Sainte- CN St-Charles Manicouagan Foy Ultramar TFT Saint-Laurent Chemins de fer d'intérêt local (CFIL) Autres compagnies Cap- Pont de Québec 20 CN Rouge CN Fleuve 132 Carrier Montmagny CCFO COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER DE L'OUTAOUAIS 1 AMT AGENCE MÉTROPOLITAINE DE TRANSPORT 1 Charny Diamond 218 QNSL West Jct Emeril QNSL CFC CHEMIN DE FER CHARLEVOIX INC. 1 2 Joffre CFQC(MTQ) APM ADMINISTRATION PORTUAIRE DE MONTRÉAL 275 Saint-Henri 1 1 Rivière NLC CFG(MTQ)CFL CHEMINCOMPAGNIE DE FER DU CHEMINDE LA GASPÉSIE DE FER LANAUDIÈRE INC. -
Réseau Ferroviaire Au Québec
Mont- Wright Fire Scheffer KLTR Baie James Schefferville ville Tracé de 1927 du Conseil privé Clermont RÉSEAU FERROVIAIRE QUÉBÉCOIS (non définitif) L’Ange-Gardien Grandes compagnies de chemin de fer Chemins de fer d’entreprise AMIC T CFC racé de 1927 du Conseil privé ÎLE D’ORLÉANS TFT CN COMPAGNIE DES CHEMINS DE FER NATIONAUX DU CANADA AMIC ARCELORMITTAL INFRASTRUCTURE CANADA s.e.n.c. 1 368 2 1 Love (CANADIEN NATIONAL) 73 CFRS LA COMPAGNIE DU CHEMIN DE FER ROBERVAL-SAGUENAY (non définitif) 40 CN (CFILINQ) CHEMIN DE FER D’INTÉRÊT LOCAL INTERNE DU NORD DU QUÉBEC 2 QNSL COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER DU LITTORAL NORD DE QUÉBEC 440 2 2 Hedley Sainte- CP COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER CANADIEN PACIFIQUE ET DU LABRADOR INC. Pétronille Esker 1 Limoilou Beaumont CP (CMQ) CHEMINS DE FER DU CENTRE DU MAINE ET DU QUÉBEC RTFT RIO TINTO FER ET TITANE INC. 573 132 CNCFQG du Palais 2 CP740 CANADA INC. 20 L’Ancienne- Allenby QUÉBEC Réservoir 2 Lorette CN TFT VIA VIA RAIL CANADA INC. Autres compagnies CN Montmagny Manicouagan Saint- Tunnel de LÉVIS Pont-Rouge L’Anse-au- CFQG Henri IV Sacrement Foulon Anse-au- CN Chemins de fer d'intérêt local (CFIL) APM ADMINISTRATION PORTUAIRE DE MONTRÉAL 2 40 Foulon Sainte- QNSL 2 CN St-Charles APS ADMINISTRATION PORTUAIRE DU SAGUENAY Donnacona CN Foy Ultramar Emeril 1 3 Saint-Augustin- Saint-Laurent CCFAQ COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER ARNAUD (QUÉBEC) BLRC BLOOM LAKE RAILWAY COMPANY (Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador) Cap- Pont de QNSL de-Desmaures 20 1 Québec CN NLC Ross Bay CFC CHEMIN DE FER CHARLEVOIX INC. -
Crha Ews Report
crha ews Report P.O. BOX 22. STATION "B" MONTREAL 2. QUEBEC NUMBER 132 ---------~- *** -~~. -'--.:.. - ---...,- ~ =-- Where was the above 'photo taken? The scene shows a Canadian Northern Railway train hauled by locomotive 222, later No. 1283, class H-6-c. The engine, built by Montreal Locomotive Works in 1907 was sold by Canadian National Railways in May 1942 for service on the Commonwealth Railways of Australia. A locomot ive of the same class has been preserved by the City of Barrie, Ontario (#1531). Can anyone identify the location or circumstan ces of the photograph ? J • • ...'" o::;) r C.R.H.A. News Report Page 55 MORE INFORMATION ABOUT "WADDON" The drawing reproduced on the opposite page is the product of the skilled hand of our mem M. U. operation for ber Mr. John Sanders, a former British Railways fireman, and now a resident of Montreal. It CRHA No. 114 depicts one of the London, Bri f.hton & South Coast Railway's 'Terrier" tank locomotives, of the type which has been donated Word has been received r~ently to the Association as recorded that CRHA 1114 is being equipped in the March issue of the News for M. U. operation. Although Report. most of the requixed equipment has been completed, M.U. service will Also, we have received add not commence before May 26. CRHA itional information about the #114 will be the "A" unit of a locomotive from Mr. R.F. Corley, pair, the "B" unit of which has in that contrary to the state already been selected but Wilch at ment made in the March issue, the moment has been assigned no the locomotive was not immediat number. -
Stronger Ties: a Shared Commitment to Railway Safety
STRONGER TIES: A S H A R E D C O M M I T M E N T TO RAILWAY SAFETY Review of the Railway Safety Act November 2007 Published by Railway Safety Act Review Secretariat Ottawa, Canada K1A 0N5 This report is available at: www.tc.gc.ca/tcss/RSA_Review-Examen_LSF Funding for this publication was provided by Transport Canada. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department. ISBN 978-0-662-05408-5 Catalogue No. T33-16/2008 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Transport, 2007 This material may be freely reproduced for non-commercial purposes provided that the source is acknowledged. Photo Credits: Chapters 1-10: Transport Canada; Appendix B: CP Images TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................1 1.1 Rationale for the 2006 Railway Safety Act Review . .2 1.2 Scope . 2 1.3 Process ....................................................................................3 1.3.1 Stakeholder Consultations . .4 1.3.2 Research . 6 1.3.3 Development of Recommendations .......................................6 1.4 Key Challenges for the Railway Industry and the Regulator.................7 1.5 A Word of Thanks .................................................................... 10 2. STATE OF RAIL SAFETY IN CANADA ...................................11 2.1 Accidents 1989-2006 ................................................................. 12 2.2 Categories of Accidents . 13 2.2.1 Main Track Accidents...................................................... 14 2.2.2 Non-Main Track Accidents ............................................... 15 2.2.3 Crossing and Trespasser Accidents . 15 2.2.4 Transportation of Dangerous Goods Accidents and Incidents . 17 2.3 Normalizing Accidents . 18 2.4 Comparing Rail Safety in Canada and the U.S. -
Ottawa Central Railway, Spareboard, December 2007
December, 2007 V3N12 NB GOVERNMENT LOOKING AT IMPROVING FREIGHT RAIL SERVICE As momentum builds to fast track an Atlantic Gateway initiative and a Southern New Brunswick Gateway around Saint John, the time is right to look at how rail transportation can be improved, says Doug Johnson, an assistant deputy minister for the New Brunswick Department of Transportation. It's the right idea at the right Photo courtesy OCR time, says Johnson, who sees railway Getting set for the journey ahead, Canadian military vehicles are loaded and transportation as a means to combat ready to roll from Pembroke, ON. Ottawa Central Railway commenced rising oil prices and climate change. loading on January 10th with completion January 18th. "We only see the opportunity as being more important on rail over time for our people in New Brunswick," he said. "There are New Power for Inside The Spareboard some types of commodities that GO Transit Vol 3 No 12 move best in a railcar." • “Backtrack” 2 An added benefit of rail is the GO trains will soon carry more • Fern’s Rule of the Month 2 significant reductions in greenhouse passengers thanks to a fleet of • From the ‘Dining Car’ 3 gas emissions versus truck traffic. A powerful new locomotives. Ontario • Incidents & Accidents 4 locomotive can carry the capacity of Premier Dalton McGuinty and GO • Performance Indicators 5 & 10 • “Steele Rail” by Don Steele 6 20 transport trucks, emitting 50% Transit officials unveiled the new • Birthdays/Anniversaries 8 less carbon dioxide per kilometre. locomotive January 14th at Toronto’s • From “The Corner Office” 9 Johnson said the Liberal Union Station. -
This Railroad Makes a Good Case for Keeping up With
NEWS&PHOTOS gallons of diesel fuel, indicating a burn of roughly 30 gallons per equipment required, and that’s when OCR entered with its offer to less and adds more customer value in terms of stewardship of the carload, high by U.S. standards. One reason is train speed. OCR provide equipment assuming certain operating parameters were customers’ goods than any of the other five indicators. In its month- shares the 117 miles between Coteau and its Walkley Yard terminal met. Adding two days per turn would kill the economics for OCR ly “Spareboard” employee newsletter (one of the nicest such letters in Ottawa with VIA, where track speeds are in excess of 60 mph. It as well, thus the emphasis on car-cycle times. I’ve seen), OCR posts monthly observations by employees, as well as ROY BLANCHARD also maintains its own 90-mile main to Pembroke at 50 mph. Another of the OCR performance measures is the percentage of a running total of noncompliance by rule. Even though engineers are instructed to keep speeds below 40 weekly car placements that fall within guarantees made to custom- The railroad averages nearly 200 observations per month yet the This short line makes a good mph to conserve fuel, that’s still double the speed found on most of ers. James Allen, OCR’s general manager, said the line expects 98 incidence of noncompliance per month can be counted on the fin- the 500-plus U.S. short lines. So why, you ask, does OCR run at percent, but that placements were on time 99 percent this year. -
2004-1101-Ottawa-Central-ETT-4.Pdf
OUR MISSION To be our customers’ preferred supplier of transportation logistics services to help them meet the needs of their own customers. BASIS OF OUR MISSION To make a significant contribution to our customers’ commercial success by providing safe, efficient and cost- effective transportation logistics services. OTTAWA CENTRAL RAILWAY TIME TABLE NO. 4 Effective Monday November 1st, 2004 REFER TO PAGE 2 FOR EFFECTIVE TIME AND FOR OTHER TIME AND DATE CHANGES THAT WILL OCCUR JAMES ALLEN GENERAL MANAGER OTTAWA ONT LUC LAROSE TRANSPORTATION SUPERVISOR OTTAWA ONT. TIME TABLE NO 4 OTTAWA CENTRAL RAILWAY Page 2 November 1st 2004 MAJOR CHANGES TO TIME TABLE NO 4 Information previously contained in the monthly- re-issue of bulletins has been placed in the subdivisions to which it applies. System Special Instructions containing Rule changes and Special Instructions have been revised. General Operating Instructions have been revised Rule 105(a) is applicable on all non-main tracks except tracks at Smurfit Stone. Beachburg Sub RTC Standby Channel has Changed. Main track ends at mile 85.0 Speeds on the North and South Freight shed leads and the Sheffeild Industrial have changed Renfrew Sub RTC Standby Channel has Changed Vankleek Sub RTC Standby Channel, tones and DTMF Codes have Changed L'Orignal Sub RTC Standby Channel, tones and DTMF Codes have Changed TIME TABLE NO 4 OTTAWA CENTRAL RAILWAY Page 3 November 1st 2004 EFFECTIVE 0001 Monday November 1st, 2004 on Beachburg, Renfrew ,Vankleek and L'Orignal Subdivisions Governed by: Eastern Standard Time Commencing at 0100 Sunday, October 31st, 2004 Eastern Daylight Saving Time Commencing at 0300 Sunday April 3rd, 2005 Eastern Standard Time Commencing at 0100 Sunday, October 30th, 2005 THIS TIME TABLE IS FOR THE INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE OF OCR EMPLOYEES AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO USE IT. -
Revitalization of Rail Passenger Service
REVIVING RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE IN NORTHERN ONTARIO ‘IS IT POSSIBLE AND HOW CAN IT HAPPEN’ A DISCUSSION PAPER Prepared and developed by: W.H. (Howie) Wilcox, cmilt Transportation Logistics Consultant Sault Ste. Marie, ON September 21, 2009 INTRODUCTION: This paper has been produced to give a brief history of the dilution of passenger train service in the north, what it looks like today and how it could possibly be revised with the right attention in key areas. The concepts contained herein are those of the writer only with very little input from any other source other than research of information available in the public domain. Some of the ideas put forth are easily implemented with few adjustments to current systems while others are more complicated – possibly requiring government intervention, especially from the Province of Ontario. HISTORY: With advent of the opening of the Trans Canada Highway around Lake Superior and the introduction of regularly, scheduled air services from the north, the rail passenger services of both Canadian Pacific and Canadian National slowly declined and VIA Rail was created to take their places. Eventually, VIA consolidated its runs so that it only operates on the CN Transcontinental line through Sudbury to Winnipeg. Communities like Thunder Bay, Dryden and Kenora lost their passenger services. The Sault Ste. Marie to Sudbury Budd car that was so badly marketed (poor connections and slow service), many abandoned it for other means and service was discontinued in 1976. Only a few services survived until today and they are maintained because the areas serviced are considered remote with no other means of conveyance. -
CN Makes Superior Proposal to Combine with Kansas City Southern
Superior Proposal to Combine With Kansas City Southern INVESTOR PRESENTATION April 2021 Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements included in this presentation constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and under Canadian securities laws, including statements based on management’s assessment and assumptions and publicly available information with respect to KCS, regarding the proposed transaction between CN and KCS, the expected benefits and synergies of the proposed transaction, future opportunities for the combined company and future shareholder returns. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The Company cautions that its assumptions may not materialize and that current economic conditions render such assumptions, although reasonable at the time they were made, subject to greater uncertainty. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “assumes,” “outlook,” “plans,” “targets,” or other similar words. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of CN, or the combined company, to be materially different from the outlook or any future results, performance or achievements implied by such statements. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Important -
Rolling Contact Fatigue: a Comprehensive Review Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Rolling Contact Fatigue: A Comprehensive Review Administration Office of Railroad Policy and Development Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/24 Final Report November 2011 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers‘ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. -
Taking Action Prendre Des Mesures
Summer / Été 2014 Taking Action Prendre des mesures Rail sector moves to strengthen rail safety one year after the accident in Lac-Mégantic Le secteur ferroviaire renforce la sécurité ferroviaire, un an après l’accident à Lac-Mégantic RAC Dangerous Goods Team outreach La sensibilisation par l’équipe des marchandises dangereuses de l’ACFC Public-Rail Safety Week 2014 Semaine de sensibilisation à la sécurité ferroviaire 2014 Rail-Government Interface 2014 Échanges rail-gouvernement 2014 RAC DG Team Turns 15 L’équipe des MD de l’ACFC a 15 ans PM# 40064978 PM# Official Publication of the Railway Association of Canada / Publication officielle de l’Association des chemins de fer du Canada RailroadServices of Canada,LTD CarCartopper Topper Material Handler – Bulk material loading and unloading – Ability to traverse cars of varying height RailR Unloading Machine – Curve, tangent, single or double unloading – Self-propelled – Grading, ditching and crossing work LIDAR Truck – PTC asset management, clearance analysis, and engineering GenG II Rail Train Automated Tie Down Car – Reduces required work window – Increases the safety of loading and unloading rail – Remotely controlled P.L.U.S.P. and SMART Train Ballast Unloading – Inside/outside dumping – High speed ballast unloading 24 hours per day ONE COMPANY FOR ALL OF YOUR SPECIALITY RAILROAD NEEDS www.hrscl.ca l 780.955.3677 686146_Herzog.indd 1 15/03/14 11:52 AM 693870_CN.indd 1 09/05/14 4:35 AM www.abrail.comw S RANNSIT TRTRACA K SSIGGNALS MATERIALS CIVIL SWITCHING TRANA CIIVIIL SWSWITCCHING TRANSIT