DOCSLIB.ORG

A Taxonomic Revision of Batropetes (Amphibia, Microsauria) from the Rotliegend (Basal Permian) of Germany

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Taxonomic Revision of Batropetes (Amphibia, Microsauria) from the Rotliegend (Basal Permian) of Germany N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 269/1 (2013), 73–96 Article Stuttgart, July 2013 A taxonomic revision of Batropetes (Amphibia, Microsauria) from the Rotliegend (basal Permian) of Germany Sabine Glienke With 8 figures Abstract: The genus Batropetes is one of the most completely preserved representatives of the micro- saur family Brachystelechidae. Previously, the only species to be described was Batropetes fritschi, based on 19 mostly poorly preserved specimens from the Döhlen Basin in eastern Germany, and one referred specimen from the Saar-Nahe Basin in western Germany. Reexamination of this material demonstrates that the referred specimen differs from the type material, and it is named Batropetes niederkirchensis n. sp. in this study. The two species differ in the shape of the prefrontal and postor- bital, the width of the interorbital region, the number of presacral vertebrae, the degree of ossification of the scapulocoracoid, and the position of the obturator foramen. The functional interpretation of the skull and the locomotion apparatus suggests that the genus was terrestrial, living near the lakes, where they are preserved in the sediments. Key words: Microsauria, morphology, Saar-Nahe Basin, Döhlen Basin, palaeoecology. 1. Introduction & REISZ 2003; ANDERSON 2008; ANDERSON et al. 2008), by others to the stem group of the Lissamphibia (VAL- Most microsaurs are from the Upper Carboniferous LIN & LAURIN 2004) and by other workers to be unre- and Lower Permian of North America and the Upper lated to any lissamphibians (RUTA et al. 2003). Carboniferous of the Czech Republic. Until now, only The first discoveries of Batropetes were made in the genera Altenglanerpeton, Batropetes, Saxoner- the Döhlen Basin near Dresden in Saxony. They were peton and Tambaroter have been described from the described by GEINITZ and DEICHMÜLLER (1882) as Hy- European Lower Permian (CARROLL & GASKILL 1971, loplesion Fritschia. In 1885 CREDNER used the name 1978; HENRICI et al. 2011; GLIENKE 2012). They are re- Hylonomus Fritschi and in 1890 he further established stricted to the Rotliegend of Germany. Batropetes is of the species Petrobates truncatus. In 1971, CARROLL & great significance, because, of its relatively complete GASKILL changed the name Petrobates to Batropetes, preservation, it best represents the family Brachy- an anagram of Petrobates, but they mistook this ge- stelechidae, which also includes the genera Carrolla nus for a captorhinomorph reptile. Seven years later (LANGSTON & OLSON 1986; MADDIN et al. 2011) and CARROLL & GASKILL (1978) revised all specimens from Quasicaecilia (CARROLL 1990) from the Lower Permi- the Döhlen Basin. They established the new genus an of Texas. This family is considered by some authors Saxonerpeton and some of the specimens they named to belong to the stem group of the Caecilia (ANDERSON Brachystelechus fritschi, for which they stated signifi- ©2013 E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany www.schweizerbart.de DOI: 10.1127/0077-7749/2013/0336 0077-7749/2013/0336 $ 5.75.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Die Microsauria Des Mitteleuropäischen Rotliegend
    Die Microsauria des mitteleuropäischen Rotliegend Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades „Doktor der Naturwissenschaften" im Promotionsfach Geologie/Paläontologie am Fachbereich Chemie, Pharmazie und Geowissenschaften der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz Sabine Glienke geb. in Worms Mainz, 2011 http://d-nb.info/1058187503 Inhalt Inhalt 1. Einleitung 6 1.1. Allgemeine Merkmale und Bearbeitungsgeschichte 6 1.2. Fundorte und Erhaltung 9 2. Methoden, Abkürzungen und Material 16 2.1. Methoden 16 2.1.1. Bearbeitung der Skelette 16 2.1.2. Gewinnung und Bearbeitung der Einzelknochen 16 2.1.3. Kladogramme 17 2.2. Abkürzungen 17 2.2.1. Sammlungen 17 2.2.2. In den Zeichnungen verwendete Abkürzungen 17 2.3. Übersicht über die untersuchten Skelette 19 3. Beschreibungen 21 3.1. Die Familie Brachystelechidae CARROLL& GASKILL, 1978 21 3.1.1. Systematische Stellung 21 3.1.2. Diagnose 21 3.2. Die Gattung Batropetes CARROLL & GASKILL, 1971 21 3.2.1. Systematische Stellung 21 3.2.2. Diagnose 22 3.2.3. Die vier Spezies der Gattung Batropetes 22 3.3. Batropetes niederkirchensis n. sp 26 3.3.1. Diagnose 26 3.3.2. Beschreibung 28 3.3.2.1. Schädel 28 3.3.2.1.1. Schädeldach 28 3.3.2.1.2. Gaumen 38 3.3.2.1.3. Hirnkapsel 43 3.3.2.1.4. Unterkiefer 46 3.3.2.2. Postcraniales Skelett 48 Inhalt 3.4. Batropetes palatinus n. sp 62 3.4.1. Diagnose 62 3.4.2. Beschreibung 63 3.4.2.1. Schädel 74 3.4.2.1.1. Schädeldach 74 3.4.2.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha)
    Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) by Richard Kissel A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Richard Kissel 2010 Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) Richard Kissel Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Based on dental, cranial, and postcranial anatomy, members of the Permo-Carboniferous clade Diadectidae are generally regarded as the earliest tetrapods capable of processing high-fiber plant material; presented here is a review of diadectid morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, and paleozoogeography. Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Diadectidae within Diadectomorpha, the sister-group to Amniota, with Limnoscelis as the sister-taxon to Tseajaia + Diadectidae. Analysis of diadectid interrelationships of all known taxa for which adequate specimens and information are known—the first of its kind conducted—positions Ambedus pusillus as the sister-taxon to all other forms, with Diadectes sanmiguelensis, Orobates pabsti, Desmatodon hesperis, Diadectes absitus, and (Diadectes sideropelicus + Diadectes tenuitectes + Diasparactus zenos) representing progressively more derived taxa in a series of nested clades. In light of these results, it is recommended herein that the species Diadectes sanmiguelensis be referred to the new genus
    [Show full text]
  • Early Tetrapod Relationships Revisited
    Biol. Rev. (2003), 78, pp. 251–345. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 251 DOI: 10.1017/S1464793102006103 Printed in the United Kingdom Early tetrapod relationships revisited MARCELLO RUTA1*, MICHAEL I. COATES1 and DONALD L. J. QUICKE2 1 The Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637-1508, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2 Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL57PY, UK and Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW75BD, UK ([email protected]) (Received 29 November 2001; revised 28 August 2002; accepted 2 September 2002) ABSTRACT In an attempt to investigate differences between the most widely discussed hypotheses of early tetrapod relation- ships, we assembled a new data matrix including 90 taxa coded for 319 cranial and postcranial characters. We have incorporated, where possible, original observations of numerous taxa spread throughout the major tetrapod clades. A stem-based (total-group) definition of Tetrapoda is preferred over apomorphy- and node-based (crown-group) definitions. This definition is operational, since it is based on a formal character analysis. A PAUP* search using a recently implemented version of the parsimony ratchet method yields 64 shortest trees. Differ- ences between these trees concern: (1) the internal relationships of aı¨stopods, the three selected species of which form a trichotomy; (2) the internal relationships of embolomeres, with Archeria
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Environmental Drivers of Paleozoic Tetrapod Dispersal Across Pangaea
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07623-x OPEN Physical and environmental drivers of Paleozoic tetrapod dispersal across Pangaea Neil Brocklehurst1,2, Emma M. Dunne3, Daniel D. Cashmore3 &Jӧrg Frӧbisch2,4 The Carboniferous and Permian were crucial intervals in the establishment of terrestrial ecosystems, which occurred alongside substantial environmental and climate changes throughout the globe, as well as the final assembly of the supercontinent of Pangaea. The fl 1234567890():,; in uence of these changes on tetrapod biogeography is highly contentious, with some authors suggesting a cosmopolitan fauna resulting from a lack of barriers, and some iden- tifying provincialism. Here we carry out a detailed historical biogeographic analysis of late Paleozoic tetrapods to study the patterns of dispersal and vicariance. A likelihood-based approach to infer ancestral areas is combined with stochastic mapping to assess rates of vicariance and dispersal. Both the late Carboniferous and the end-Guadalupian are char- acterised by a decrease in dispersal and a vicariance peak in amniotes and amphibians. The first of these shifts is attributed to orogenic activity, the second to increasing climate heterogeneity. 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK. 2 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany. 3 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. 4 Institut
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 Appendix S1: Complete List of Characters And
    1 1 Appendix S1: Complete list of characters and modifications to the data matrix of RC07, with 2 reports of new observations of specimens. 3 The names, the abbreviations and the order of all characters and their states are 4 unchanged from RC07 unless a change is explained. We renumbered the characters we did 5 not delete from 1 to 277, so the character numbers do not match those of RC07. However, 6 merged characters retain the abbreviations of all their components: PREMAX 1-2-3 (our 7 character 1) consists of the characters PREMAX 1, PREMAX 2 and PREMAX 3 of RC07, 8 while MAX 5/PAL 5 (our ch. 22) is assembled from MAX 5 and PAL 5 of RC07. We did not 9 add any characters, except for splitting state 1 of INT FEN 1 into the new state 1 of INT FEN 10 1 (ch. 84) and states 1 and 2 of the new character MED ROS 1 (ch. 85), undoing the merger 11 of PIN FOR 1 and PIN FOR 2 (ch. 91 and 92) and splitting state 0 of TEETH 3 into the new 12 state 0 of TEETH 3 (ch. 183) and the entire new character TEETH 10 (ch. 190). A few 13 characters have additional states or are recoded in other ways. Deleted characters are retained 14 here, together with the reasons why we deleted them and the changes we made to their scores. 15 All multistate characters mention in their names whether they are ordered, unordered, 16 or treated according to a stepmatrix.
    [Show full text]
  • (Temnospondyli), and the Evolution of Modern
    THE LOWER PERMIAN DISSOROPHOID DOLESERPETON (TEMNOSPONDYLI), AND THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN AMPHIBIANS Trond Sigurdsen Department of Biology McGill University, Montreal November 2009 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Trond Sigurdsen 2009 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to my supervisors Robert L. Carroll and David M. Green for their support, and for revising and correcting the drafts of the individual chapters. Without their guidance, encouragement, and enthusiasm this project would not have been possible. Hans Larsson has also provided invaluable help, comments, and suggestions. Special thanks go to John R. Bolt, who provided specimens and contributed to Chapters 1 and 3. I thank Farish Jenkins, Jason Anderson, and Eric Lombard for making additional specimens available. Robert Holmes, Jean-Claude Rage, and Zbyněk Roček have all provided helpful comments and observations. Finally, I would like to thank present and past members of the Paleolab at the Redpath Museum, Montreal, for helping out in various ways. Specifically, Thomas Alexander Dececchi, Nadia Fröbisch, Luke Harrison, Audrey Heppleston and Erin Maxwell have contributed helpful comments and technical insight. Funding was provided by NSERC, the Max Stern Recruitment Fellowship (McGill), the Delise Allison and Alma Mater student travel grants (McGill), and the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Student Travel Grant. 2 CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTHORS Chapters 1 and 3 were written in collaboration with Dr. John R. Bolt from the Field Museum of Chicago. The present author decided the general direction of these chapters, studied specimens, conducted the analyses, and wrote the final drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvanian Vertebrate Fauna
    VII PENNSYLVANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA By ROY LEE MOODIE THE PENNSYLVANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF KENTUCKY By ROY LEE MOODIE INTRODUCTION The vertebrates which one may expect to find in the Penn- sylvanian of Kentucky are the various types of fishes, enclosed in nodules embedded in shale, as well as in limestone and in coal; amphibians of many types, found heretofore in nodules and in cannel coal; and probably reptiles. A single incomplete skeleton found in Ohio, described below, seems to be a true reptile. Footprints and fragmentary skeletal elements found in Pennsylvania1 in Kansas2 in Oklahoma3, in Texas4 in Illinois5, and other regions, in rocks of late Pennsylvanian or early Permian age, and often spoken of as Permo- Carboniferous, indicate types of vertebrates, some of which may be reptiles. No skeletal remains or other evidences of Pennsylvanian vertebrates have so far been found in Kentucky, but there is no reason why they cannot confidently be expected to occur. A single printed reference points to such vertebrate remains6. As shown by the map, Kentucky lies immediately adjacent to regions where Pennsylvanian vertebrates have been found. That important discoveries may still be made is indicated by Carman's recent find7. Ohio where important discoveries of 1Case, E. C. Description of vertebrate fossils from the vicinity of Pittsburgh, Pa: Annals of the Carnegie Museum, IV, Nos. III-IV, pp. 234-241. pl. LIX, 1908. 2Williston, S. W. Some vertebrates from the Kansas Permian: Kansas Univ. Quart., ser. A, VI, No.1, pp. 53. fig., 1897. 3Case, E. C., On some vertebrate fossils from the Permian beds of Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Maddin Etal 2012
    The Braincase of Eocaecilia micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the Origin of Caecilians The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Maddin, Hillary Catherine, Farish A. Jenkins Jr., and Jason S. Anderson. 2012. The braincase of Eocaecilia micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the origin of caecilians. PLoS ONE 7(12): e50743. Published Version doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050743 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9969388 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP The Braincase of Eocaecilia micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the Origin of Caecilians Hillary C. Maddin1,2*, Farish A. Jenkins, Jr.1, Jason S. Anderson2 1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, 2 Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Abstract The scant fossil record of caecilians has obscured the origin and evolution of this lissamphibian group. Eocaecilia micropodia from the Lower Jurassic of North America remains the only stem-group caecilian with an almost complete skull preserved. However, this taxon has been controversial, engendering re-evaluation of traits considered to be plesiomorphic for extant caecilians. Both the validity of the placement of E. micropodia as a stem caecilian and estimates of the plesiomorphic condition of extant caecilians have been questioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Modern Amphibians: a Commentary
    The origin(s) of modern amphibians: a commentary. D. Marjanovic, Michel Laurin To cite this version: D. Marjanovic, Michel Laurin. The origin(s) of modern amphibians: a commentary.. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Wiley, 2009, 36, pp.336-338. 10.1007/s11692-009-9065-8. hal-00549002 HAL Id: hal-00549002 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00549002 Submitted on 7 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The origin(s) of modern amphibians: a commentary By David Marjanović1 and Michel Laurin1* 1Address: UMR CNRS 7207 “Centre de Recherches sur la Paléobiodiversité et les Paléoenvironnements”, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Histoire de la Terre, Bâtiment de Géologie, case postale 48, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05, France *Corresponding author tel/fax. (+33 1) 44 27 36 92 E-mail: [email protected] Number of words: 1884 Number of words in text section only: 1378 2 Anderson (2008) recently reviewed the controversial topic of extant amphibian origins, on which three (groups of) hypotheses exist at the moment. Anderson favors the “polyphyly hypothesis” (PH), which considers the extant amphibians to be polyphyletic with respect to many Paleozoic limbed vertebrates and was most recently supported by the analysis of Anderson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/11/2021 02:28:07AM Via Free Access 202 Ascarrunz Et Al
    Contributions to Zoology, 85 (2) 201-234 (2016) Triadobatrachus massinoti, the earliest known lissamphibian (Vertebrata: Tetrapoda) re-examined by µCT scan, and the evolution of trunk length in batrachians Eduardo Ascarrunz1, 2, Jean-Claude Rage2, Pierre Legreneur3, Michel Laurin2 1 Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 6, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland 2 Sorbonne Universités CR2P, CNRS-MNHN-UPMC, Département Histoire de la Terre, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP 38, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France 3 Inter-University Laboratory of Human Movement Biology, University of Lyon, 27-29 Bd du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cédex, France 4 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: Anura, caudopelvic apparatus, CT scan, Salientia, Triassic, trunk evolution Abstract Systematic palaeontology ........................................................... 206 Geological context and age ................................................. 206 Triadobatrachus massinoti is a batrachian known from a single Description .............................................................................. 207 fossil from the Early Triassic of Madagascar that presents a com- General appearance of the reassembled nodule ............ 207 bination of apomorphic salientian and plesiomorphic batrachian Skull ........................................................................................... 208 characters. Herein we offer a revised description of the specimen Axial skeleton .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Triassic Stem-Salamander from Kyrgyzstan and the Origin of Salamanders
    A Triassic stem-salamander from Kyrgyzstan and the origin of salamanders Rainer R. Schocha,1, Ralf Werneburgb, and Sebastian Voigtc aStaatliches Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany; bNaturhistorisches Museum Schloss Bertholdsburg, D-98553 Schleusingen, Germany; and cUrweltmuseum GEOSKOP/Burg Lichtenberg (Pfalz), D-66871 Thallichtenberg, Germany Edited by Neil H. Shubin, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved April 3, 2020 (received for review January 24, 2020) The origin of extant amphibians remains largely obscure, with Cretaceous in northwestern China, providing much data on the only a few early Mesozoic stem taxa known, as opposed to a much early evolution and diversification of the clade. better fossil record from the mid-Jurassic on. In recent time, an- Recently, a German team excavating in the Kyrgyz Madygen urans have been traced back to Early Triassic forms and caecilians Formation (16) recovered a second find of Triassurus that is not have been traced back to the Late Jurassic Eocaecilia, both of only larger and better preserved, but also adds significantly more which exemplify the stepwise acquisition of apomorphies. Yet data on this taxon. Reexamination of the type has revealed the most ancient stem-salamanders, known from mid-Jurassic shared apomorphic features between the two Madygen speci- rocks, shed little light on the origin of the clade. The gap between mens, some of which turned out to be stem-salamander (uro- salamanders and other lissamphibians, as well as Paleozoic tetra- pods, remains considerable. Here we report a new specimen of dele) autapomorphies. The present findings demonstrate not Triassurus sixtelae, a hitherto enigmatic tetrapod from the Middle/ only that Triassurus is a valid tetrapod taxon, but also, and more Late Triassic of Kyrgyzstan, which we identify as the geologically oldest importantly, that it forms a very basal stem-salamander, com- stem-group salamander.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/4084574/Burrow Young1999.Pdf 1262 Burrow, C
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.19.882829; this version posted December 27, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under 1aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Recalibrating the transcriptomic timetree of jawed vertebrates 1 David Marjanović 2 Department of Evolutionary Morphology, Science Programme “Evolution and Geoprocesses”, 3 Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz Institute for Evolutionary and Biodiversity Research, Berlin, 4 Germany 5 Correspondence: 6 David Marjanović 7 [email protected] 8 Keywords: timetree, calibration, divergence date, Gnathostomata, Vertebrata 9 Abstract 10 Molecular divergence dating has the potential to overcome the incompleteness of the fossil record in 11 inferring when cladogenetic events (splits, divergences) happened, but needs to be calibrated by the 12 fossil record. Ideally but unrealistically, this would require practitioners to be specialists in molecular 13 evolution, in the phylogeny and the fossil record of all sampled taxa, and in the chronostratigraphy of 14 the sites the fossils were found in. Paleontologists have therefore tried to help by publishing 15 compendia of recommended calibrations, and molecular biologists unfamiliar with the fossil record 16 have made heavy use of such works. Using a recent example of a large timetree inferred from 17 molecular data, I demonstrate that calibration dates cannot be taken from published compendia 18 without risking strong distortions to the results, because compendia become outdated faster than they 19 are published. The present work cannot serve as such a compendium either; in the slightly longer 20 term, it can only highlight known and overlooked problems.
    [Show full text]