DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded from Brill.Com09/26/2021 08:04:52PM Via Free Access 150 D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded from Brill.Com09/26/2021 08:04:52PM Via Free Access 150 D Contributions to Zoology, 77 (3) 149-199 (2008) A reevaluation of the evidence supporting an unorthodox hypothesis on the origin of extant amphibians David Marjanovic´, Michel Laurin UMR 7179, Équipe ‘Squelette des Vertébrés’, CNRS/Université Paris 6, 4 place Jussieu, case 19, 75005 Paris, France, [email protected] Key words: Albanerpetontidae, Brachydectes, coding, continuous characters, data matrix, Gerobatrachus, Gym- nophioniformes, Gymnophionomorpha, Lissamphibia, Lysorophia, morphology, ontogeny, paleontology, phylogeny, scoring, stepmatrix gap-weighting Abstract Contents The origin of frogs, salamanders and caecilians is controver- Introduction ............................................................................. 149 sial. McGowan published an original hypothesis on lissam- Nomenclatural remarks.......................................................... 152 phibian origins in 2002 (McGowan, 2002, Zoological Journal Phylogenetic nomenclature............................................... 152 of the Linnean Society, 135: 1-32), stating that Gymnophiona Rank‑based nomenclature................................................ 154 was nested inside the ‘microsaurian’ lepospondyls, this clade Abbreviations............................................................................ 154 was the sister-group of a caudate‑salientian‑albanerpetontid Methods..................................................................................... 155 clade, and both were nested inside the dissorophoid temno- Addition of Brachydectes and homology of its spondyls. We have investigated McGowan’s data matrix and dermal skull bones.............................................................. 155 disagree with the scoring of 35% of the cells. All taxa and all Ontogeny and phylogenetic position of Doleserpeton.. 157 but two characters are affected. In some cases, we have a dif- Ontogeny and phylogenetic position of Brachydectes... 157 ferent interpretation about correspondence between mor- Addition of Gerobatrachus and its ontogeny and phology and character states, or we delimit states differently phylogenetic position ........................................................ 158 (or use information that was unknown in 2002). In others, we Phylogenetic analysis......................................................... 159 report probable typographic errors. When these cells and Rooting the tree.................................................................. 159 characters are revised, the most parsimonious trees – now Interpretation of the OTUs.............................................. 160 longer by almost 64% – support one of the three commonly Revision of the matrix....................................................... 163 advocated hypotheses, namely a monophyletic Lissamphibia Results........................................................................................ 163 nested, together with its sister-group Albanerpetontidae, Discussion.................................................................................. 166 within the temnospondyls (next to Doleserpeton) – even Implications of the size of the matrix............................ 166 though we did not add any characters or taxa to the very Implications of the quality of the matrix...................... 167 small data matrix. This exemplifies the impact of errors in Analyses without Gerobatrachus...................................... 168 data matrices on the results of phylogenetic analyses. Adding Interpretation of Gerobatrachus and effects the lysorophian Brachydectes, however, results in the Lissam- of its addition to our analysis.......................................... 168 phibia‑Albanerpetontidae clade becoming the sister-group of ‘Microsaur’ phylogeny....................................................... 169 Brachydectes and settling within the lepospondyls rather than The phylogenetic position of Albanerpetontidae........ 169 the temnospondyls, thus supporting another of the previously Acknowledgments.................................................................... 169 published three hypotheses. This latter finding does not References.................................................................................. 170 change if the recently described Gerobatrachus is also added. Appendix 1................................................................................ 177 Finally, when Doleserpeton is interpreted as morphologically Appendix 2................................................................................ 198 immature (which means scoring three characters as unknown Appendix 3................................................................................ 199 instead of known), Lissamphibia and Albanerpetontidae are again nested within the ‘microsaurian’ lepospondyls, even though Brachydectes is not included in this analysis. This, too, does not change if Gerobatrachus is added and likewise treat- Introduction ed as morphologically immature. Bootstrap supports are rather low under all assumptions. Such lability was to be ex- The origin of lissamphibians remains highly conten- pected from the small size of the data matrix. tious, despite decades of intensive research (Vallin Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 08:04:52PM via free access 150 D. Marjanovic´ and M. Laurin – Reevaluation of extant amphibian origins and Laurin, 2004; Pawley, 2006: appendix 16; An- other than to Amniota, as do all morphological derson, 2007; Ruta and Coates, 2007; Marjanovic´ analyses based on extant taxa, but paleontological and Laurin, 2007; Anderson et al., 2008a). Our hy- analyses suggest several incompatible hypotheses potheses about the relationships between the rele- about lissamphibian origins. vant extinct taxa (from the late Paleozoic and early Currently, three main hypotheses (all with vari- Mesozoic) have been fairly stable in phylogenetic ants) on lissamphibian origins are discussed based analyses over the last two decades (the various on morphological data. The first hypothesis (Fig. groups of ‘lepospondyls’ are the obvious exception), 1a-d) advocates a single origin within dissorophoid while widely divergent opinions persist on where to temnospondyls (Bolt, 1969 [with reservations], insert the anurans, urodeles and gymnophionans 1977; Milner, 1988, 1993; Panchen and Smithson, into this tree. Part of the problem is a stratigraphic 1988; Trueb and Cloutier, 1991; Lombard and Sum- gap between the oldest known representatives of ida, 1992; Ahlberg and Milner, 1994; Ruta et al., the lissamphibians on the one hand and the first ap- 2003; Ruta and Coates, 2007; Jenkins and Walsh in pearance of most or all of their proposed sister- Jen­kins et al., 2007). The second hypothesis (Fig. groups on the other, as noted by Schoch and Milner 1e) advocates a single origin within lepospondyls (2004). (Laurin and Reisz, 1997, 1999; Laurin, 1998a, b; Early phylogenetic analyses of paleontological Vallin and Laurin, 2004; see also Pawley, 2006: 239 data divided most early limbed vertebrates into an and appendix 16). In the third hypothesis (Fig. 1f, amphibian clade composed of temnospondyls and g), the extant amphibians are deemed to have origi- lepospondyls, and a reptiliomorph clade composed nated from at least two, but usually three groups of of embolomeres, seymouriamorphs, diadecto- Paleozoic stegocephalians (Carroll and Currie, morphs and amniotes (Gauthier et al., 1988; Trueb 1975; Carroll and Holmes, 1980; Schoch and Car- and Cloutier, 1991; Lombard and Sumida, 1992; roll, 2003; Carroll et al., 2004; Carroll, 2007; Carroll Ahlberg and Milner, 1994; Fig. 1a, b). However, in Jenkins et al., 2007; Anderson, 2007; Anderson et nearly all recent paleontological studies indicate al., 2008a), once or twice within lepospondyls (gym- that the lepospondyls are closer to the amniotes nophionans and sometimes urodeles), and once or than the temnospondyls and the seymouriamorphs twice within dissorophoid temnospondyls (anurans are, and this topology is now nearly consensual and sometimes urodeles). Unlike the two monophy- (Carroll, 1995, 2007: fig. 77; Laurin and Reisz, 1997, ly hypotheses, it is not compatible with the results 1999; Laurin, 1998a, b; Anderson, 2001, 2007; Ruta of the molecular analyses cited above, and has so et al., 2003; Vallin and Laurin, 2004; Pawley, 2006; far only been supported by two very similar pub- Ruta and Coates, 2007; Anderson et al., 2008a; see lished data matrices (Anderson, 2007; Anderson et Fig. 1c-e, g-h) – only the position of the extant am- al., 2008a) (Fig. 1g). phibians within this tree is not. This latter question The phylogenetic analysis by McGowan (2002) has not yet been resolved, even though it has been supports a fourth hypothesis (Fig. 2): the extant assessed using anatomical data on extant (Carroll amphibians are diphyletic, the (‘microsaurian’) lep- and Currie, 1975; Carroll and Holmes, 1980) and ospondyls are stem gymnophionans, and the lepo- extinct (Milner, 1988, 1993; Laurin and Reisz, 1997, spondyls including the extant amphibians are nested 1999; Laurin, 1998a, b; Anderson, 2001, 2007; Ruta within the (dissorophoid) temnospondyls, contra- et al., 2003; Carroll et al., 2004; Schoch and Milner, dicting the consensus that Temnospondyli and 2004; Vallin and Laurin, 2004; Pawley, 2006; Ruta Lepo­spondyli form mutually exclusive clades (Car- and Coates, 2007; Anderson et al., 2008a) forms, as roll, 1995; Vallin and Laurin, 2004; Pawley, 2006; well as developmentary (Schoch and Carroll, 2003; Ruta and Coates,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Szentesi Et Al.Indd
    FRAGMENTA PALAEONTOLOGICA HUNGARICA Volume 32 Budapest, 2015 pp. 49–66 Albanerpetontidae from the late Pliocene (MN 16A) Csarnóta 3 locality (Villány Hills, South Hungary) in the collection of the Hungarian Natural History Museum Zoltán Szentesi1, Piroska Pazonyi2 & Lukács Mészáros3 1Department of Palaeontology and Geology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, H-1083 Budapest, Ludovika tér 2, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 2MTA–MTM–ELTE Research Group for Palaeontology H-1083 Budapest, Ludovika tér 2, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Palaeontology, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – Based on cranial and jaw elements, the presence of Albanerpeton pannonicum species (Allocaudata: Albanerpetontidae) was noticed from the late Pliocene Csarnóta 3 locality (Villány Hills). Since it is considered a poor fossil site, it had not been suffi ciently studied. Th ese fossils represent the geologically youngest record of the species from Hungary. Th ough, the Csarnóta 3 albanerpetontid assemblage is small the bones are well preserved, and all are informative on spe- cies or at least on genus level. Th e red coloured bone-bearing deposits and the preservation quality of bones are very similar to the uppermost strata (4–1) of the Csarnóta 2 palaeovertebrate locality. Th e study of small mammal fauna also suggests this correlation, as well as explains the age of the site. Th e studied vertebrate fauna forms a transition between the woodland and steppe wildlife. With 17 fi gures and 3 tables. Key words – Albanerpeton, Albanerpetontidae, late Pliocene, small mam mals, taphonomy, Vil- lány Hills INTRODUCTION Albanerpetontidae are a Middle Jurassic – late Pliocene clade of salaman- der-like lissamphibians that are closely related to anurans and salamanders (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Microsauria Des Mitteleuropäischen Rotliegend
    Die Microsauria des mitteleuropäischen Rotliegend Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades „Doktor der Naturwissenschaften" im Promotionsfach Geologie/Paläontologie am Fachbereich Chemie, Pharmazie und Geowissenschaften der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz Sabine Glienke geb. in Worms Mainz, 2011 http://d-nb.info/1058187503 Inhalt Inhalt 1. Einleitung 6 1.1. Allgemeine Merkmale und Bearbeitungsgeschichte 6 1.2. Fundorte und Erhaltung 9 2. Methoden, Abkürzungen und Material 16 2.1. Methoden 16 2.1.1. Bearbeitung der Skelette 16 2.1.2. Gewinnung und Bearbeitung der Einzelknochen 16 2.1.3. Kladogramme 17 2.2. Abkürzungen 17 2.2.1. Sammlungen 17 2.2.2. In den Zeichnungen verwendete Abkürzungen 17 2.3. Übersicht über die untersuchten Skelette 19 3. Beschreibungen 21 3.1. Die Familie Brachystelechidae CARROLL& GASKILL, 1978 21 3.1.1. Systematische Stellung 21 3.1.2. Diagnose 21 3.2. Die Gattung Batropetes CARROLL & GASKILL, 1971 21 3.2.1. Systematische Stellung 21 3.2.2. Diagnose 22 3.2.3. Die vier Spezies der Gattung Batropetes 22 3.3. Batropetes niederkirchensis n. sp 26 3.3.1. Diagnose 26 3.3.2. Beschreibung 28 3.3.2.1. Schädel 28 3.3.2.1.1. Schädeldach 28 3.3.2.1.2. Gaumen 38 3.3.2.1.3. Hirnkapsel 43 3.3.2.1.4. Unterkiefer 46 3.3.2.2. Postcraniales Skelett 48 Inhalt 3.4. Batropetes palatinus n. sp 62 3.4.1. Diagnose 62 3.4.2. Beschreibung 63 3.4.2.1. Schädel 74 3.4.2.1.1. Schädeldach 74 3.4.2.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
    Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • New Permian Fauna from Tropical Gondwana
    ARTICLE Received 18 Jun 2015 | Accepted 18 Sep 2015 | Published 5 Nov 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9676 OPEN New Permian fauna from tropical Gondwana Juan C. Cisneros1,2, Claudia Marsicano3, Kenneth D. Angielczyk4, Roger M. H. Smith5,6, Martha Richter7, Jo¨rg Fro¨bisch8,9, Christian F. Kammerer8 & Rudyard W. Sadleir4,10 Terrestrial vertebrates are first known to colonize high-latitude regions during the middle Permian (Guadalupian) about 270 million years ago, following the Pennsylvanian Gondwanan continental glaciation. However, despite over 150 years of study in these areas, the bio- geographic origins of these rich communities of land-dwelling vertebrates remain obscure. Here we report on a new early Permian continental tetrapod fauna from South America in tropical Western Gondwana that sheds new light on patterns of tetrapod distribution. Northeastern Brazil hosted an extensive lacustrine system inhabited by a unique community of temnospondyl amphibians and reptiles that considerably expand the known temporal and geographic ranges of key subgroups. Our findings demonstrate that tetrapod groups common in later Permian and Triassic temperate communities were already present in tropical Gondwana by the early Permian (Cisuralian). This new fauna constitutes a new biogeographic province with North American affinities and clearly demonstrates that tetrapod dispersal into Gondwana was already underway at the beginning of the Permian. 1 Centro de Cieˆncias da Natureza, Universidade Federal do Piauı´, 64049-550 Teresina, Brazil. 2 Programa de Po´s-Graduac¸a˜o em Geocieˆncias, Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50740-533 Recife, Brazil. 3 Departamento de Cs. Geologicas, FCEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, IDEAN- CONICET, C1428EHA Ciudad Auto´noma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Microvertebrate Assemblage from the Mussentuchit
    A new microvertebrate assemblage from the Mussentuchit Member, Cedar Mountain Formation: insights into the paleobiodiversity and paleobiogeography of early Late Cretaceous ecosystems in western North America Haviv M. Avrahami1,2,3, Terry A. Gates1, Andrew B. Heckert3, Peter J. Makovicky4 and Lindsay E. Zanno1,2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA 2 North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, USA 3 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA 4 Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA ABSTRACT The vertebrate fauna of the Late Cretaceous Mussentuchit Member of the Cedar Mountain Formation has been studied for nearly three decades, yet the fossil-rich unit continues to produce new information about life in western North America approximately 97 million years ago. Here we report on the composition of the Cliffs of Insanity (COI) microvertebrate locality, a newly sampled site containing perhaps one of the densest concentrations of microvertebrate fossils yet discovered in the Mussentuchit Member. The COI locality preserves osteichthyan, lissamphibian, testudinatan, mesoeucrocodylian, dinosaurian, metatherian, and trace fossil remains and is among the most taxonomically rich microvertebrate localities in the Mussentuchit Submitted 30 May 2018 fi fi Accepted 8 October 2018 Member. To better re ne taxonomic identi cations of isolated theropod dinosaur Published 16 November 2018 teeth, we used quantitative analyses of taxonomically comprehensive databases of Corresponding authors theropod tooth measurements, adding new data on theropod tooth morphodiversity in Haviv M. Avrahami, this poorly understood interval. We further provide the first descriptions of [email protected] tyrannosauroid premaxillary teeth and document the earliest North American record of Lindsay E.
    [Show full text]
  • Limb Ossification in the Paleozoic Branchiosaurid Apateon (Temnospondyli) and the Early Evolution of Preaxial Dominance in Tetrapod Limb Development
    EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 9:1, 69 –75 (2007) Limb ossification in the Paleozoic branchiosaurid Apateon (Temnospondyli) and the early evolution of preaxial dominance in tetrapod limb development Nadia B. Fro¨bisch,a,Ã Robert L. Carroll,a and Rainer R. Schochb aRedpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal H3A 2K6, Canada bStaatliches Museum fu¨r Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany ÃAuthor for correspondence (email: [email protected]) SUMMARY Despite the wide range of shapes and sizes that divergent evolution of these two pathways and its causes are accompany a vast variety of functions, the development of still not understood. Based on an extensive ontogenetic series tetrapod limbs follows a conservative pattern of de novo we investigated the pattern of limb development of the 300 Ma condensation, branching, and segmentation. Development of old branchiosaurid amphibian Apateon. This revealed a the zeugopodium and digital arch typically occurs in a posterior preaxial dominance in limb development that was previously to anterior sequence, referred to as postaxial dominance, with believed to be unique and derived for modern salamanders. a digital sequence of 4–3–5–2–1. The only exception to this The Branchiosauridae are favored as close relatives of pattern in all of living Tetrapoda can be found in salamanders, extant salamanders in most phylogenetic hypotheses of the which display a preaxial dominance in limb development, a de highly controversial origins and relationships of extant novo condensation of a basale commune (distal carpal/tarsal amphibians. The findings provide new insights into the 112) and a precoccial development of digits I and II.
    [Show full text]
  • BOA2.1 Caecilian Biology and Natural History.Key
    The Biology of Amphibians @ Agnes Scott College Mark Mandica Executive Director The Amphibian Foundation [email protected] 678 379 TOAD (8623) 2.1: Introduction to Caecilians Microcaecilia dermatophaga Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia There are more than 20 synapomorphies (shared characters) uniting the group Lissamphibia Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Integumen is Glandular Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Glandular Skin, with 2 main types of glands. Mucous Glands Aid in cutaneous respiration, reproduction, thermoregulation and defense. Granular Glands Secrete toxic and/or noxious compounds and aid in defense Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Pedicellate Teeth crown (dentine, with enamel covering) gum line suture (fibrous connective tissue, where tooth can break off) basal element (dentine) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Sacral Vertebrae Sacral Vertebrae Connects pelvic girdle to The spine. Amphibians have no more than one sacral vertebrae (caecilians have none) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Amphicoelus Vertebrae Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Opercular apparatus Unique to amphibians and Operculum part of the sound conducting mechanism Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Fat Bodies Surrounding Gonads Fat Bodies Insulate gonads Evolution of Amphibians † † † † Actinopterygian Coelacanth, Tetrapodomorpha †Amniota *Gerobatrachus (Ray-fin Fishes) Lungfish (stem-tetrapods) (Reptiles, Mammals)Lepospondyls † (’frogomander’) Eocaecilia GymnophionaKaraurus Caudata Triadobatrachus Anura (including Apoda Urodela Prosalirus †) Salientia Batrachia Lissamphibia
    [Show full text]
  • Bioseries12-Amphibians-Taita-English
    0c m 12 Symbol key 3456 habitat pond puddle river stream 78 underground day / night day 9101112131415161718 night altitude high low vegetation types shamba forest plantation prelim pages ENGLISH.indd ii 2009/10/22 02:03:47 PM SANBI Biodiversity Series Amphibians of the Taita Hills by G.J. Measey, P.K. Malonza and V. Muchai 2009 prelim pages ENGLISH.indd Sec1:i 2009/10/27 07:51:49 AM SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 September 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include responsibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and ora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editor: Gerrit Germishuizen Design & layout: Elizma Fouché Cover design: Elizma Fouché How to cite this publication MEASEY, G.J., MALONZA, P.K. & MUCHAI, V. 2009. Amphibians of the Taita Hills / Am bia wa milima ya Taita. SANBI Biodiversity Series 12. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cretaceous) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, Southern England
    A new albanerpetontid amphibian from the Barremian (Early Cretaceous) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, southern England STEVEN C. SWEETMAN and JAMES D. GARDNER Sweetman, S.C. and Gardner, J.D. 2013. A new albanerpetontid amphibian from the Barremian (Early Cretaceous) Wes− sex Formation of the Isle of Wight, southern England. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 58 (2): 295–324. A new albanerpetontid, Wesserpeton evansae gen. et sp. nov., from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, southern England, is described. Wesserpeton is established on the basis of a unique combination of primitive and derived characters relating to the frontals and jaws which render it distinct from currently recognized albanerpetontid genera: Albanerpeton (Late Cretaceous to Pliocene of Europe, Early Cretaceous to Paleocene of North America and Late Cretaceous of Asia); Celtedens (Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Europe); and Anoualerpeton (Middle Jurassic of Europe and Early Cretaceous of North Africa). Although Wesserpeton exhibits considerable intraspecific variation in characters pertaining to the jaws and, to a lesser extent, frontals, the new taxon differs from Celtedens in the shape of the internasal process and gross morphology of the frontals in dorsal or ventral view. It differs from Anoualerpeton in the lack of pronounced heterodonty of dentary and maxillary teeth; and in the more medial loca− tion and direction of opening of the suprapalatal pit. The new taxon cannot be referred to Albanerpeton on the basis of the morphology of the frontals. Wesserpeton currently represents the youngest record of Albanerpetontidae in Britain. Key words: Lissamphibia, Albanerpetontidae, microvertebrates, Cretaceous, Britain. Steven C.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibiaweb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth
    AmphibiaWeb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth Created and Illustrated by the 2020-2021 AmphibiaWeb URAP Team: Alice Drozd, Arjun Mehta, Ash Reining, Kira Wiesinger, and Ann T. Chang This introduction to amphibians was written by University of California, Berkeley AmphibiaWeb Undergraduate Research Apprentices for people who love amphibians. Thank you to the many AmphibiaWeb apprentices over the last 21 years for their efforts. Edited by members of the AmphibiaWeb Steering Committee CC BY-NC-SA 2 Dedicated in loving memory of David B. Wake Founding Director of AmphibiaWeb (8 June 1936 - 29 April 2021) Dave Wake was a dedicated amphibian biologist who mentored and educated countless people. With the launch of AmphibiaWeb in 2000, Dave sought to bring the conservation science and basic fact-based biology of all amphibians to a single place where everyone could access the information freely. Until his last day, David remained a tirelessly dedicated scientist and ally of the amphibians of the world. 3 Table of Contents What are Amphibians? Their Characteristics ...................................................................................... 7 Orders of Amphibians.................................................................................... 7 Where are Amphibians? Where are Amphibians? ............................................................................... 9 What are Bioregions? ..................................................................................10 Conservation of Amphibians Why Save Amphibians? .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of the Dissorophoid Temnospondyls
    Journal of Paleontology, 93(1), 2019, p. 137–156 Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 0022-3360/15/0088-0906 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2018.67 The putative lissamphibian stem-group: phylogeny and evolution of the dissorophoid temnospondyls Rainer R. Schoch Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Rosenstein 1, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany 〈[email protected]〉 Abstract.—Dissorophoid temnospondyls are widely considered to have given rise to some or all modern amphibians (Lissamphibia), but their ingroup relationships still bear major unresolved questions. An inclusive phylogenetic ana- lysis of dissorophoids gives new insights into the large-scale topology of relationships. Based on a TNT 1.5 analysis (33 taxa, 108 characters), the enigmatic taxon Perryella is found to nest just outside Dissorophoidea (phylogenetic defintion), but shares a range of synapomorphies with this clade. The dissorophoids proper are found to encompass a first dichotomy between the largely paedomorphic Micromelerpetidae and all other taxa (Xerodromes). Within the latter, there is a basal dichotomy between the large, heavily ossified Olsoniformes (Dissorophidae + Trematopidae) and the small salamander-like Amphibamiformes (new taxon), which include four clades: (1) Micropholidae (Tersomius, Pasawioops, Micropholis); (2) Amphibamidae sensu stricto (Doleserpeton, Amphibamus); (3) Branchiosaur- idae (Branchiosaurus, Apateon, Leptorophus, Schoenfelderpeton); and (4) Lissamphibia. The genera Platyrhinops and Eos- copus are here found to nest at the base of Amphibamiformes. Represented by their basal-most stem-taxa (Triadobatrachus, Karaurus, Eocaecilia), lissamphibians nest with Gerobatrachus rather than Amphibamidae, as repeatedly found by former analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Heber Den Archegosaurus Der Stciiikohleiiforntatioii. Wenn Auch
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Palaeontographica - Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Vorzeit Jahr/Year: 1851 Band/Volume: 1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Meyer Hermann Christian Erich von Artikel/Article: Ueber den Archegosaurus der Steinkohlenformation. 209-215 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Heber den Archegosaurus der Stciiikohleiiforntatioii. Von Hermann von Meyer. Die Nachrichten über das Vorkommen von Reptilien in Gebilden älter als die Formation des Zechsteins hatten sich bei genauerer Prüfung immer als unhaltbar bewiesen. Man glaubte sich daher um so mehr berechtigt, anzunehmen, dass im Zechstein die ältesten Reptilien begraben lägen, als während der Versammlung der Naturforscher in Mainz Dr. Gergens und Alex. Braun mir eine Wirbelthier- Versteinerung aus dem der Steinkohlenformation angehörigen, durch seine Fische berühmten Schieferthon von Münster- Appel in der bayerschen Pfalz vorlegten, deren Beschaffenheit mehr auf ein Wirbelthier mit Füssen als auf einen Fisch schliessen Hess. Dieses merkwürdige kleine Geschöpf habe ich Anfangs 1844, es Apateon pedestris nennend, beschrieben (Jahrb. f. Min. 1844. S. 336), später aber in den Palaeontographicis (1. S. 152. Taf. 20. Fig. t.) dargelegt. Drei Jahre darauf gelang es dem Berghauptmann v. Dechen in den Sphärosideritnieren der Steinkohlenformation zu Lebach im Saarbrücken'schen, woraus zuvor ebenfalls nur Fische bekannt waren , Ueberreste zu entdecken , welche an die Gegenwart von Sauriern in diesem Ge- bilde glauben Hessen. Mit dem zu Münster-Appel gefundenen Thier stimmten sie nicht überein. Die erste Nachricht darüber theilte Goldfuss in der Niederrheinischen Gesellschaft für Natur- und Heilkunde in Bonn am 18. Februar 1847 mit.
    [Show full text]