A Central European Constellation VISEGRAD GROUP CELEBRATES ITS FIFTEENTH ANNIVERSARY Jirˇí Paroubek

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Central European Constellation VISEGRAD GROUP CELEBRATES ITS FIFTEENTH ANNIVERSARY Jirˇí Paroubek The Visegrad va Group W aa rsz a wa ha – A Central isl a t European ra Pr BB udap est International Visegrad Fund Constellation W a rsza wa ha a Pr BBratislava udap est International Visegrad Fund The Visegrad Publication Group on the Occasion of the 15th Anniversary A Central of the Visegrad Group. Edited by Andrzej Jagodziƒski European Bratislava 2006 Constellation BRATISLAVA BUDAPEST PRAGUE WARSAW of Visegrad 15 Years The Visegrad Group – A Central European Constellation 13 15 Years of Visegrad VISEGRAD GROUP CELEBRATES ITS FIFTEENTH ANNIVERSARY Jirˇí Paroubek After the fundamental changes in Central Europe at the end of 1989, it was necessary to move swiftly to get rid of the consequences of totalitarianism, to arrange the withdrawal of Soviet troops, and to quickly prepare the countries of Central Europe for membership in European and trans-Atlantic structures. One of the useful means of achieving these goals was the creation of a common platform represented by the Visegrad Group. During the initial phase of its existence, from 1991 to 1993 – when Czechoslovakia still existed – the Visegrad Group played an important role in our communications with NATO and the European Union. The process of expanding both institutions was both time-consuming and complex. It also contributed to the creation of qualitatively new bilateral relations between the countries in the Group. The ability of the Visegrad countries to cooperate and coordinate their approaches impressed the democratic countries of Western Europe. After the creation of the Czech Republic and Slovakia from the former Czechoslovakia in 1993, when the Visegrad Three became the Visegrad Four, however, that cooperation began to flag. The Czech right-wing government of the time decided that it would be most effective if each country took an individual 15 Years of Visegrad 15 Years approach to entry to Euro-Atlantic integration. That approach, however, soon proved wrong. 14 Moreover, it left the impression that the Czech Republic had no interest in developing contacts, other than strictly bilateral ones, with its Visegrad neighbours, Slovakia, Hungary, and Poland. After the Czech parliamentary elections in 1998, which brought Czech social democratic parties to power, there was a revival of the cooperation between the Visegrad states on the political level. With the entry of the Visegrad countries into NATO and the European Union, the original aims of the Visegrad declaration of 1991 were attained. All the member countries simultaneously expressed the political will to resume the positive aspects of their past The Visegrad Group – A Central European Constellation cooperation and to continue working together in that spirit in the new situation. The Visegrad Group gradually gained a very good name for itself, both in Europe and in the rest of the world. Today, it has become a respected “trademark” on the international scene, one that is sought out both to the East and to the West of “Visegrad”. At present, it can be considered the most clearly defined initiative in Central Europe. Under the Czech chairmanship, from 2003 to 2004, discussions on future cooperation were concluded. The second Visegrad declaration, signed in Kromeˇrˇízˇ in 2004, is a reflection of the situation after the entry of the Visegrad countries into the EU. Under the Polish chairmanship, the Visegrad Group intensified its foreign policy activity, and reacted quickly to political changes in the surrounding region. Observers from the V4 countries were present during presidential elections in Ukraine. The Visegrad Group expressed its support for democratic processes in that country. The present Hungarian chairmanship is working to develop the civic dimension of the Visegrad Group, and is strengthening cooperation between the various ministries inside the V4. Fears that the activities of the Visegrad Group would flag after the member countries joined the EU have proven unfounded. If we take into account meetings on all levels (from presidential meetings to the regular sessions held by various working groups) as well as projects financed by the International Visegrad Fund, at least one Visegrad event takes place every day. That is the most eloquent proof available that the Visegrad Group has not declined in significance. Today, it is no longer a matter for the political elite – practically every citizen of our country can now participate in its activities. Visegrad has in no way become institutionalized. It is based on the principle of regular meetings between representatives of the four countries, and its practical content is provided by cooperation among the various ministries. At present, there are numerous of projects under way in the areas of culture, environment, internal security, defence, science, and education. Cooperation is also flourishing in the areas of justice, transportation, tourism, energy, and information technology. One of the Visegrad Group’s most firmly established organizational structures is the International Visegrad Fund (IVF), founded in 2000 with the aim of supporting cultural cooperation, scientific exchanges, research, and cooperation in the area of education, youth exchanges, and cross-border cooperation. In the vast majority of cases, the Fund finances the activities of non-governmental organizations, lending support to the civic dimension of cooperation within the Visegrad Group. In an important activity, since the end of the previous academic year, the Visegrad Scholarship Program has awarded one-year post-graduate scholarships to students from Eastern Europe to study in the Visegrad countries. After the Visegrad countries joined the EU, the foreign policy activities of the Group increased considerably. Visegrad did not hesitate to become involved in broader forms of regional cooperation, such as the Regional Partnership (V4+2, in other words, the Visegrad countries plus Austria and Slovenia) that emerged from an Austrian initiative in 2001. Areas of common interest Jirˇí Paroubek were established, such as internal security issues, matters relating to borders, questions of asylum, Politician, economist. Member of the Czech Social Democratic Party, consular matters, cultural cooperation, and the creation of common infrastructure projects. since 2005 Vice-Chairman Since 2001 the Visegrad Group has begun to develop a relationship with the Benelux of the ˇCSSD. Minister for Regional countries. This consists chiefly of an informal exchange of opinions on current European topics, Development in Stanislav Gross government (2004–2005). as well as work on several concrete common themes, such as problems surrounding the Since 2005, Prime Minister Schengen Agreement on migration. Other contributions include inter-parliamentary contacts, of Visegrad 15 Years of the Czech Republic. exchange programs, and consultation between other institutions, or cooperation within the 15 framework of the Euro Controle Route (road traffic safety issues). During the Czech chairmanship, contacts were also established with the Nordic Council with the purpose of getting information about the Council’s experience with regional cooperation, and to compare the activities of the Nordic Council with those of the Benelux and to seek inspiration for the development of the Visegrad Group. Discussions were also initiated on cooperation with Japan, which is interested in working together in the areas of tourism and development aid, as well as on several economic matters. The Visegrad Group – A Central European Constellation The renewed circumstances in Ukraine after the presidential elections of 2004 opened up new opportunities for cooperation with this large country. In addition to the activities of the International Visegrad Fund, a cooperation is starting to take place in the political sphere as well. Julia Tymoshenko, who was then the Prime Minister of Ukraine, took part in a meeting of V4 Prime Ministers in Poland in May, 2005. Other Ukrainian representatives took part as guests in some of the deliberations of the Visegrad Group. Other activities are being prepared that should help strengthen reforms in our largest eastern neighbour. The Visegrad Group is also aiming to find ways to support the democratization process in Belarus, and has included Moldova among its priorities for 2006. The Czech Republic considers the Visegrad Group as a key element in promoting regional cooperation in Central Europe. It sees its significance in concrete projects (the introduction of Schengen standards, cooperation among ministries, strengthening relations among citizens of the Visegrad Group) as well as in political cooperation wherever the will exists. Cooperation within the V4 will help to strengthen the identity of Central Europe, and is very useful in coordinating positions on key questions on the European agenda. The potential role of Visegrad in regard to neighbouring countries that are not yet members of the European Union is not to be ignored either. Despite some differences among the countries of the V4, in general the Group enjoys a significant convergence of interests and the will to strengthen mutual ties. Our four countries already have considerable experience in the conduct of dialogue, which makes it possible for them to take common positions. This approach derives from a mutual understanding of the need to pursue individual national interests, and from complete respect for the foreign policy activities of the individual Visegrad countries. All of these factors make cooperation within the Visegrad Group a useful
Recommended publications
  • Legislation for the Reuse of Biosolids on Agricultural Land in Europe: Overview
    sustainability Review Legislation for the Reuse of Biosolids on Agricultural Land in Europe: Overview Maria Cristina Collivignarelli 1 , Alessandro Abbà 2, Andrea Frattarola 1, Marco Carnevale Miino 1 , Sergio Padovani 3, Ioannis Katsoyiannis 4,* and Vincenzo Torretta 5 1 Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy; [email protected] (M.C.C.); [email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (M.C.M.) 2 Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy; [email protected] 3 ARPA Lombardia, Pavia Department, via Nino Bixio 13, 27100 Pavia, Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Chemical and Environmental Technology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece 5 Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, via G.B. Vico 46, 21100 Varese, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 September 2019; Accepted: 25 October 2019; Published: 29 October 2019 Abstract: The issues concerning the management of sewage sludge produced in wastewater treatment plants are becoming more important in Europe due to: (i) the modification of sludge quality (biological and chemical sludge are often mixed with negative impacts on sludge management, especially for land application); (ii) the evolution of legislation (landfill disposal is banned in many European countries); and (iii) the technologies for energy and material recovery from sludge not being fully applied in all European Member States. Furthermore, Directive 2018/851/EC introduced the waste hierarchy that involved a new strategy with the prevention in waste production and the minimization of landfill disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • HSA January 2010 Newsletter
    HSA Hungarian Studies Association www.hungarianstudies.info January 2010 NEWSLETTER Election Results: Emese Ivan was elected as vice president, Steve Jobbitt and Catherine Portuges were elected to serve on the executive board, and I was reelected as secretary/treasurer for the next two years. Thank you and congratulations to the others elected. Thus, the current leadership is: President: Paul Hanebrink, Rutgers U., Term: 2010-2011. Email: [email protected] Vice-President*: Emese Ivan, St. John’s U., Term: 2010-2011. Email: [email protected] Secretary-Treasurer: Susan Glanz, St. John’s U., Term: 2010-2011. Email: [email protected] Executive Committee: Steve Jobbitt, California State U.-Fullerton., Term: 2010-2011. Email: [email protected] Catherine Portuges, U of Mass. -Amherst, Term: 2010-2011. Email: [email protected] Julia Bock, Long Island U., Term: 2009-2010. Email: [email protected] Béla Bodó, Missouri State U., Term: 2009–2010. Email: belabodo@ missouristate.edu *According to our by-laws on January 1, 2012, Emese Ivan, our current VP, will automatically assume the position of the president. Report from the Treasurer: Opening balance 12/1/2008 $2,978.59 Income: $1024.91 Subtotal $4003.50 Expenditures*: Central Europeanist meeting at AAASS $375.00 Business meeting at AASS $122.24 PennyWise Consulting (website) $160.00 Bank Service fee $ 5.00 Subtotal $662.24 Closing balance 12/22/2009 $3,341.26 The check for the *article award ($200.00) was mailed, but has not been cashed yet. The Book Award: In 2010, the HSA will be awarding the Book Award. Nominations should be forwarded directly to the Book Prize Committee: Paul Hanebrink, [email protected] Arpad von Klimo, [email protected] Mark Pittaway, [email protected] 1 To be eligible for the Book Award the book must be in English and be published in the last three years.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Alberta
    University of Alberta Making Magyars, Creating Hungary: András Fáy, István Bezerédj and Ödön Beöthy’s Reform-Era Contributions to the Development of Hungarian Civil Society by Eva Margaret Bodnar A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics © Eva Margaret Bodnar Spring 2011 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Abstract The relationship between magyarization and Hungarian civil society during the reform era of Hungarian history (1790-1848) is the subject of this dissertation. This thesis examines the cultural and political activities of three liberal oppositional nobles: András Fáy (1786-1864), István Bezerédj (1796-1856) and Ödön Beöthy (1796-1854). These three men were chosen as the basis of this study because of their commitment to a two- pronged approach to politics: they advocated greater cultural magyarization in the multiethnic Hungarian Kingdom and campaigned to extend the protection of the Hungarian constitution to segments of the non-aristocratic portion of the Hungarian population.
    [Show full text]
  • We're Not Nazis, But…
    August 2014 American ideals. Universal values. Acknowledgements On human rights, the United States must be a beacon. This report was made possible by the generous Activists fighting for freedom around the globe continue to support of the David Berg Foundation and Arthur & look to us for inspiration and count on us for support. Toni Rembe Rock. Upholding human rights is not only a moral obligation; it’s Human Rights First has for many years worked to a vital national interest. America is strongest when our combat hate crimes, antisemitism and anti-Roma policies and actions match our values. discrimination in Europe. This report is the result of Human Rights First is an independent advocacy and trips by Sonni Efron and Tad Stahnke to Greece and action organization that challenges America to live up to Hungary in April, 2014, and to Greece in May, 2014, its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in as well as interviews and consultations with a wide the struggle for human rights so we press the U.S. range of human rights activists, government officials, government and private companies to respect human national and international NGOs, multinational rights and the rule of law. When they don’t, we step in to bodies, scholars, attorneys, journalists, and victims. demand reform, accountability, and justice. Around the We salute their courage and dedication, and give world, we work where we can best harness American heartfelt thanks for their counsel and assistance. influence to secure core freedoms. We are also grateful to the following individuals for We know that it is not enough to expose and protest their work on this report: Tamas Bodoky, Maria injustice, so we create the political environment and Demertzian, Hanna Kereszturi, Peter Kreko, Paula policy solutions necessary to ensure consistent respect Garcia-Salazar, Hannah Davies, Erica Lin, Jannat for human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Hungarian Federation, Inc. 1) Who Is Doing What?
    The American Hungarian Federation, Inc. THE HUNGARIAN–AMERICAN: The 2nd & 3rd Generations, Newsletter #1, Info #9 Happy New Year in 2004! Contents (Clickable Links) 1) Who is Doing What? ................................................................................................................................ 1 2) The Hungarian Caucus in the US Congress! ............................................................................................. 3 3) AMSz – Washington: Recent Activities.................................................................................................... 4 4) Calls for Help!.......................................................................................................................................... 6 A) Documentary on the 1956 Revolution Moves Forward! ....................................................................... 6 B) New Church and 1956 Memorial in Ohio ............................................................................................. 8 5) Kopjafaink + + + +................................................................................................................................... 8 1) Who is Doing What? · A novemberi New Brunswick-i osszejovetel nem rendezte hivatalosan az 50 eves evforduloval kapcsolatos szervezeti felepitest, es az ezt szervezo AMSz. Ideiglenes Bizottsaga megalakult. Jelentkezni lehet az irodaban, Dr. Szilagyi Palnal avagy Bryan Dawson S.-nal. A Bizottsag eddigi tagjai: Professor Laszlo Gutay, Liptak Bela, Lassan Gyorgy, Lovas Gyorgy, Marer
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMZÉS Felpezsdült a Hazai Befekte
    2013. október www.resourceinfo.hu 750 Ft A -csoport tagja INTERJÚ ELEMZÉS TUDÓSÍTÁS FÓKUSZ Tatár Tibor Felpezsdült a CEE Property „A” és „B” kate gó- a star toló Buda- hazai befekte- Fo rum riás iroda házak pest One-ról tési piac Bécsben Budapesten _B1-REs-1310.indd 1 10/17/13 11:43 AM BUDAPESTI zSZOLGÁLTATÓ ZRT. z¼»À»ÉÐÊóÉ»ÁÁ»ÂÌ»Éп¼»Â ·¾·È¹ÅÊ·ÌÒÂÉÒ½»ÂÂ»Ä ÁĬÈÄϻлÊÌóº»ÂÿÉлÃÆÅÄÊÅÁÄ·Áû½¼»Â»ÂįÊÒ̾įÉÐŽÒÂÊ·ÊÒÉÉÐó»ÉÁĬȸ»ÄÊĬÈÊóÄį»ÂÊ»ÈÀ»ºóÉ» óȺ»Áó¸»ÄÂóÊÁóȺóÉ·ÐÒÈƓ·ÐŹÉĤ¾įƖóɷ·ƺċÀƔ»ÈÉ»ÄÏÁóÆ»ÉÉó½»¼ÅÁÅÐÒÉ·óȺ»Áó¸»Ä· z ·ÐËÊĤ¸¸¿óÌ»Á¸»ÄÉÐÒÃÅÉÅÂϷĸ»È˾ÒÐÒÉʾ·ÀÊÅÊÊÌó½È»ƑûÂÏ»Á»È»ºÃóÄÏ»ÁóÆƷ·ÁÅÉÉÒ½¿·Â·ÆƖ ºċÀ·Êʸʷ̈ƖÁ·Â¹ÉĬÁÁ»Äʾ»ÊÊ»Ƒ¿Â»ÊÌ»·Â»½Ä·½ÏŸ¸¼įÌÒÈÅÉ¿¸»È˾ÒÐĤÁÊĬ¸¸É󽻿ɷÊÒ̾įÉÐŽÒÂÊ·Ɩ ÊÒÉÊÌÒ·ÉÐÊÅÊÊ·Ɣ Ì»ÈÉ»ÄÏÁóÆ»É ·ÀÒÄ·ʿ ÁÅÄÉÊÈËÁ¹¿ĤÁÄ·Á óÉ Ã·½·É ÉÐŽÒÂÊ·ÊÒÉ¿ ÿÄįÉó½Ä»Á ÁĬÉÐĬľ»Êį»Ä ÅÂÏ·Ä ¿Ä½·Ê·ÄÅÁ¹É·Ê·ÁÅÐÊ·Á·ÊÒ̼ŒÊóÉÈ»ƑÿÄÊ·¿É¿ÅÄÅÍ»ÈÉƑ·ÐÈÁÒº ų ƔƑ·Ð»»óÉ·ÐÊ»ÄÅÈ¿Èź·Ɩ ¾ÒзÁƔÊÒ̾įû»ÊÊÉÐĤ·пÉƑ¾Å½Ï¸¿ÐÅÄÏÅɸ»È˾ÒÐÒÉ¿»Â»Ã»Á»Ê·ÉÐŽÒÂÊ·ÊĤ÷½ÒÈ·ÌÒ·ÂƑċ½Ï ÆóºÒË·½ÒÐÁ·ÐÒÄÄÒÂÀĤÌ·ÂÁ¿É»¸¸¾»ÂÏ¿½óÄÏŒ¾įÁĬÐÆÅÄÊû½óÆċÊóÉóÊ¿ÉƔ ÐËÊĤ¸¸¿óÌ»Á¸»Ä·Ð¿É»ÈįÉċÊ»ÊÊ»· zÆÅÐċ¹¿ĤÀÒÊƑ¾Å½Ï»½ÏÈ»ÊĬ¸¸»É»Ê¸»Ä»ÂįÊóȸ»Á»ÈŎ· ¼ŒÊóɿȻĺÉлȻÁÁĬÈÄϻлÊÌóº»ÂÿÿÄįÉċÊį¸»ÉÅÈÅÂÒÉ·Ƒ·¾Å·ÊÒ̼ŒÊóÉÀ»Â»ÄÊįÉ»ÂįÄÏÊóÂÌ»ÐƔ z»Ð»Ä·ÐŋÊÅľ·Â·ºƑº»·Á¿ÉÉÐÒÃŋŎлʿ¿Ä½·Ê·ÄóÆċÊóɻÿ·ÊÊÊÅÌÒ¸¸¿Æ¿·¹ÅÁ¼»Âó¿ÉÄÏ¿ÊƑ ċ½Ï·ÐĬÄÁÅÈÃÒÄÏзʿ¿Ä½·Ê·ÄÅÁ»ÂÂÒÊÒÉ·¼»Âó¿ÉƔ·½ÏÈóÉÐŎÁÄó·ʻÂÀ»É¼ŒÊóɿȻĺÉлÈƯ·½ÒÐÁ·Ɩ ÐÒÄʿɸ»Â»óÈÊÌ»Ư¼»ÂŋÀċÊÒÉÈ·ÉÐÅÈËÂƑ·Ã¿»É»Ê»ÄÁóÄÊÊĬ¸¸ÊċÐÿ¿Ĥ¼ÅÈ¿ÄÊÅÉÁĬÂÊÉó½½»ÂÀÒȾ·ÊƔ ÂÏ»ÄÁÅÈ óȺ»Ã»É ÉÐÒÃÅÂÄ¿ · ÊÒ̾įÉÐŽÒÂÊ·ÊÒÉÉ·ÂƔ Ĭ¸¸Ƒ ÁÅÈÒ¸¸·Ä · ÊÒ̼ŒÊóÉÈį »ÌÒÂÊ ÊÒÈɷɾÒÐƑ ¿Â»ÊÌ» ĬÄÁÅÈÃÒÄÏзʿ¿Ä½·Ê·ÄÌÒ·ÉÐÊÅÊÊ·¿ÉÃóÊ·
    [Show full text]
  • The Controversy About 1944 in Hungary and the Escape of Budapest's Jews from Deportation. a Response
    Jeszenszky, Géza. “The Controversy About 1944 in Hungary and the Escape of Budapest’s Jews from Deportation. A Response.” Hungarian Cultural Studies. e-Journal of the American Hungarian Educators Association, Volume 13 (2020) DOI: 10.5195/ahea.2020.388 The Controversy About 1944 in Hungary and the Escape of Budapest’s Jews from Deportation. A Response. Géza Jeszenszky Abstract: The purpose of this Note is to clarify the interpretation of the volume, July 1944: Deportation of the Jews of Budapest Foiled (Reno, NV: Helena History Press, 2018), put forth by Peter Pastor in his book review, “A New Historical Myth from Hungary: The Legend of Colonel Ferenc Koszorús as the Wartime Saviour of the Jews of Budapest,” that was published in the 2019 issue of Hungarian Cultural Studies. Rather than making any attempt to remove or lessen blame for the acts committed following the German occupation of Hungary in March 1944, this collection of studies aims to shed light on whether Regent Horthy’s order to Colonel Ferenc Koszorús prevented the deportation of the remaining, nearly 300,000 Hungarian Jews who lived (or were just hiding) in Budapest. Keywords: Hungary, World War II, Hungarian Soviet Republic, Regent Miklós Horthy, Miklós Kállay, Colonel Ferenc Koszorús, Budapest, German occupation of Hungary, Quisling- government, Holocaust, deportations, war criminals, László Baky, F.J. Montgomery Biography: Géza Jeszenszky is a Hungarian historian and politician. He has completed degrees in history, English, and library studies at Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, where he also attained his Ph.D. Following his work as a schoolteacher and librarian, he became a university professor at today’s Corvinus University of Budapest after 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Observation Table of Contents
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 25 AND 26 SEPTEMBER 1998 ODIHR ELECTION OBSERVATION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS III THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK III.1 General III.2 The Electoral System III.3 Some Legal Issues IV THE ELECTION ADMINISTRATION V VOTER AND CIVIC EDUCATION VI VOTER REGISTRATION VII CANDIDATE REGISTRATION VIII THE PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN IX THE MEDIA X OBSERVATION ON POLLING DAY XI OBSERVATION OF COUNTING XII AGGREGATION AND VERIFICATION OF RESULTS XIII RECOMMENDATIONS 2 I. INTRODUCTION Upon invitation from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Slovak Republic of 18 August 1998, the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe=s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR) established an Election Observation Mission in Slovakia for the 25 and 26 September Parliamentary elections. Ms. Helle Degn, President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly and Chairman of the Foreign Policy Committee of the Danish Parliament, was designated by the OSCE Chairman-in-Office as his Representative for the Election in Slovakia. Mr. Kåre Vollan was appointed by the ODIHR as the OSCE On-site Co-ordinator and Head of the ODIHR Election Observation Mission, and Ms Siri Skåre as Deputy Head upon being seconded by the Government of Norway. The OSCE was involved at an early stage in the pre-election process including a visit by the ODIHR Director, Ambassador Stoudmann, on February 6 and May 5-6, and a visit by the former President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Mr. Javier Ruperez on May 4-5.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Ambivalence of Resistance: West German Antiauthoritarian Performance after the Age of Affluence Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2c73n9k4 Author Boyle, Michael Shane Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Ambivalence of Resistance West German Antiauthoritarian Performance after the Age of Affluence By Michael Shane Boyle A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Performance Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Shannon Jackson, Chair Professor Anton Kaes Professor Shannon Steen Fall 2012 The Ambivalence of Resistance West German Antiauthoritarian Performance after the Age of Affluence © Michael Shane Boyle All Rights Reserved, 2012 Abstract The Ambivalence of Resistance West German Antiauthoritarian Performance After the Age of Affluence by Michael Shane Boyle Doctor of Philosophy in Performance Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Shannon Jackson, Chair While much humanities scholarship focuses on the consequence of late capitalism’s cultural logic for artistic production and cultural consumption, this dissertation asks us to consider how the restructuring of capital accumulation in the postwar period similarly shaped activist practices in West Germany. From within the fields of theater and performance studies, “The Ambivalence of Resistance: West German Antiauthoritarian Performance after the Age of Affluence” approaches this question historically. It surveys the types of performance that decolonization and New Left movements in 1960s West Germany used to engage reconfigurations in the global labor process and the emergence of anti-imperialist struggles internationally, from documentary drama and happenings to direct action tactics like street blockades and building occupations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commune Movement During the 1960S and the 1970S in Britain, Denmark and The
    The Commune Movement during the 1960s and the 1970s in Britain, Denmark and the United States Sangdon Lee Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History September 2016 i The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement ⓒ 2016 The University of Leeds and Sangdon Lee The right of Sangdon Lee to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ii Abstract The communal revival that began in the mid-1960s developed into a new mode of activism, ‘communal activism’ or the ‘commune movement’, forming its own politics, lifestyle and ideology. Communal activism spread and flourished until the mid-1970s in many parts of the world. To analyse this global phenomenon, this thesis explores the similarities and differences between the commune movements of Denmark, UK and the US. By examining the motivations for the communal revival, links with 1960s radicalism, communes’ praxis and outward-facing activities, and the crisis within the commune movement and responses to it, this thesis places communal activism within the context of wider social movements for social change. Challenging existing interpretations which have understood the communal revival as an alternative living experiment to the nuclear family, or as a smaller part of the counter-culture, this thesis argues that the commune participants created varied and new experiments for a total revolution against the prevailing social order and its dominant values and institutions, including the patriarchal family and capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSAL MUSIC • Aaron Pritchett – the Score • Thousand Foot
    Aaron Pritchett – The Score Thousand Foot Krutch - Exhale Jon Bellion – The Human Condition Check out new releases in our Vinyl Section! New Releases From Classics And Jazz Inside!!! And more… UNI16-25 UNIVERSAL MUSIC 2450 Victoria Park Ave., Suite 1, Willowdale, Ontario M2J 5H3 Phone: (416) 718.4000 *Artwork shown may not be final May 16th, 2016 Dear Customer, Effective on the dates outlined below, the Canadian distribution of the attached list of R.E.M. titles will change from Warner Music Canada and be handled by Universal Music Canada on behalf of Concord Music Group. In order to make this transition as easy as possible for all customers, please note the following steps. ORDERS: Effective, June 30, 2016 Warner Music Canada will cancel all back orders for the products listed below. Effective July 01, 2016 Universal Music Canada will begin processing and shipping orders on the attached product listing with corresponding UMC pricing. Please refer to the attached product list for updated catalogue and UPC numbers. RETURNS: Universal Music Canada will accept return requests for this product effective July 01, 2016. Credit will be issued per the Universal Music Canada Terms and Conditions of Sale. ADVERTISING: Universal Music Canada will be responsible for ad claims issued after July 01, 2016. We trust that these procedures will make the transition as smooth as possible and we thank you for your continued support. Please contact your local Universal Music Canada representative should you have any questions. Regards, Adam Abbasakoor Vice President, Commercial Affairs Vice President, Sales Universal Music Canada Warner Music Canada R.E.M.
    [Show full text]
  • FLASH REPORT on the Activities of Danubius Hotels Nyrt
    FLASH REPORT on the activities of Danubius Hotels Nyrt. in 2006 Introduction – improvement in operating profit and profit before tax The Danubius Group produced HUF 47.3 billion revenue at consolidated level in 2006, exceeding the figure of the previous year by 11%. This was achieved with group level average rates of HUF 12,172 and group level occupancy of 67.7% which indicates that in line with our targets the company has raised the average rates (+16%) accompanied only by a moderate set back in occupancy (-2.2%). The HUF 2.8 billion operating profit shows 21% improvement. The changes in the exchange rates had a significant impact on the group performance. On the one hand, the weakening of the forint against the euro had a positive effect on our Hungarian revenues – owing to offering rates in Euro –: the monthly average rates fluctuated significantly but showed weakening of the forint all along the year (1–13% against the euro). At the same time in case of the foreign subsidiaries the local currencies strengthened against the Euro. On the other hand, due to the consolidation of the foreign subsidiaries in forint the weakening of the forint compared to the local currencies influenced our profits. Besides this, the year-end exchange rate applied when revaluating the loans did not deviate significantly from the previous year’s, meaning that the accounted exchange rate difference shows HUF 157 million profit in 2006. The consolidated profit before tax was HUF 1.8 billion in 2006, surpassing the previous year by 60% (+HUF 676 million).
    [Show full text]