DOCSLIB.ORG

The Local Border Traffic Zone Experiment As an Instrument of Cross-Border Integration: the Case of Polish-Russian Borderland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Geographia Polonica 2018, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp. 95-112 https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0102 INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL ORGANIZATION POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES www.igipz.pan.pl www.geographiapolonica.pl THE LOCAL BORDER TRAFFIC ZONE EXPERIMENT AS AN INSTRUMENT OF CROSS-BORDER INTEGRATION: THE CASE OF POLISH-RUSSIAN BORDERLAND Iwona Sagan1 •Vladimir Kolosov2 • Dominika Studzińska1 • Maria Zotova2 • Alexander Sebentsov2 • Klaudia Nowicka1 1 Department of Economic Geography, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography University of Gdańsk Bażyńskiego 4, 80-309 Gdańsk: Poland e-mails: [email protected] • [email protected] • [email protected] 2 Institute of Geography Russian Academy of Sciences Staromonetny pereulok 29, 119017 Moscow: Russia e-mails: [email protected] • [email protected] • [email protected] Abstract The main objective of this article is to offer an answer to the question whether introducing local border traf- fic (LBT) on the external frontiers of the EU is an effective tool for cross-border integration and development of marginalised border areas. The analysis was carried out in an area of particular strategic importance for the European Community and Russia, which is the Polish-Russian borderland. The study includes the analysis of political discourse supplied with the findings from the original survey revealing mutual perception of Polish and Russian partners. The authors drew special attention to the significance of delimitation of areas included in the visa-free traffic. The success of the four-year period of LBT zone’s functioning on the Polish-Kaliningrad border came as a result of modification of the regulations concerning the scope of the zone and the inclusion of economic regions otherwise heavily affected by the split in the functional dimension. The analysed region had the chance to become a model of national and local policies’ cooperation in border areas. The decision to shut down the LBT has proved yet again that socio-economic initiatives in border regions are deterministi- cally dependent on the decisions of central governments. Key words local border traffic • cross-border integration • Polish-Russian border • external border of the European Union 96 I. Sagan • V. Kolosov • D. Studzińska • M. Zotova • A. Sebentsov • K. Nowicka Introduction from the border – contradicts the idea of the policy, in which the LBT zone is a tool for cross- Historical variability of Polish-Russian cross- regional integration. border cooperation provoked subsequent The policy of cross-border integration has phases of emergence and disappearance moved on from the premise of a LBT zone of alienated or co-existing borderland. The cre- as an instrument for compensating social ation of local border traffic (LBT) zone in 2012, contacts of homogeneous groups that were which connected the Kaliningrad Oblast and divided by state borders, yet only in such as- two Polish regions – Pomeranian and Warmi- pect could the very limited range of the zone an-Mazurian – by means of visa-free traffic, of visa-free traffic find justification. Integration initiated, for the first time, a third-degree in- has become the prime objective of the good tegration process, i.e. formation of an interde- neighbourhood policy, rather than simple so- pendent borderland. The dynamic and highly cial reintegration of border regions. Never- successful experiment of integration of the theless, the new interpretation of the function regions on both sides of the boundary was of the LBT zones was not followed up with any interrupted in 2016 with the decision of Polish modifications in the laws that shape the legal government to shut down the zone. framework for their creation. Expanding sub- Intense cross-border traffic in the LBT stantially the range of the LBT zone around the zone initiated the process of creating a cross- Polish-Kaliningrad Oblast border constituted border soft space (Allmendinger et al. 2015), an exceptional departure from the regulations i.e. a space integrated by grass-root activity governing the establishment of such zones. of its residents and economic entities, which The Polish–Kaliningrad region of Russia is simultaneously regulated by different, statu- border is the border of rather peripheral lo- tory planning, economic and social policies. calization to the main communication cor- This type of spaces emerges as a result of di- ridors and the border being mainly crossed rect physical proximity of areas that belong by local inhabitants. However, it is of global to different administrations or governances, significance. Glocality of the local border be it local, regional, or national. As such, traffic zone is reflected in the utilization of its they are socially produced specific spaces, international and global meaning for achiev- independent from political and territorial divi- ing the local interests. An attempt to interpret sions. Soft spaces are functional regions that the highly complicated, dynamic and fragile do not necessarily correspond to the existing cross-border interactions as well as regional functional links. Their development is con- policy between Poland and Kaliningrad Oblast ditioned by different administrative systems is taken in this paper. existing within them. The formation of soft The authors pay attention to the impact spaces anticipates establishing of functional of asymmetric and asynchronic developments links resulting from new directions of devel- on the formation of cross-border functional re- opment that are expected to emerge from gion between Kaliningrad and the Polish ag- the new situation and/or initiated changes. glomeration of Three Cities – Gdansk, Gdynia The abolition of the visa regime, along with and Sopot. The introduction of the local border some new opportunities for activity it had in- traffic (LBT) regime changed the lifestyle in the troduced in the LBT zones, doubtlessly gives borderland. For Kaliningrad citizens it opened a strong impulse for formation of such areas. a much easier access to Europe. The loosed However to set off the mechanism that forms border regime reduced functional distance be- a soft area it is necessary to delimit a LBT zone tween Poland and Kaliningrad and in a broad- so that it covers the potential of social and er sense, between the European Union and economic links that exist on both sides of the Kaliningrad. Although in many cases the cross- frontier. Strict adherence to the arbitrarily border cooperation programmes are realized defined range of the zone – 30 km or 50 km independently on each side of the border Geographia Polonica 2018, 91, 1, pp. 95-112 The local border traffic zone experiment as an instrument of cross-border integration: The case… 97 which turns them rather into the near then the in the local border traffic agreement, which cross border activity. The problem of the asym- allowed to evaluate the effects of introduc- metry in the programmes realisation is well ing visa-free traffic in the studied borderland. analyzed in scientific literature (Melnik 2006; Interviewees included representatives of lo- Tanaka 2006; Sebentsov & Zotova 2013). cal authorities, NGOs, and entrepreneurs. Among the main explanations of the situation In 2013 a survey was carried out among the are: the institutional inequality between part- residents of Polish border zone and 250 ques- ners, insufficient level of civil society develop- tionnaires were collected. Also, a survey was ment, the lack of specialists able to compile conducted among citizens of Kaliningrad and to manage international projects. Oblast who visited Tri-City. Its purpose was On the base of the analysis it can be stat- to gather opinions of Russians on tourist attrac- ed that the border started to be perceived tiveness of Tri-City agglomeration. The survey as a resource in local economy after the LBT took place in November and December 2013 introduction. A number of border localities on a border crossing point connecting Tri-City gained a chance for development. Gdansk, with Kaliningrad, obtaining a n = 462 sam- which had been included into the LBT zone, be- ple. Additionally, a survey was carried out came a new border town. Benefits of an early among the residents of Tri-City (n = 402). This stage of the border regime loosening were allowed to evaluate local border traffic from obvious for both regions. Nevertheless, the the perspectives of all the citizens impacted cross border interactions cannot be fully justi- by the LBT agreement, both from major urban fied, at the stage they reached, as integration centres and those from smaller border towns. of two neighbouring sides into, the unavoid- The information was complemented with the ably specific, but actually one border region. data from Russian and Polish Central Statisti- The abrupt end of the cooperation has proved cal Offices, Russian Regional Customs, Border the fragility of elaborated agreements. Guard, and Customs Chamber. The objective and the Local border traffic on the external methodology of the research borders of the European Union The main objective of this article is to offer Visa-free agreements, having a long historical an answer to the question whether introducing tradition, are bilateral agreements increas- local border traffic on the external frontiers ing permeability of borders and making lives of the EU is an effective tool for cross-border of borderland inhabitants much easier. Such integration and development of marginalised agreements that were concluded soon after border areas. The article presents how the the First World War concerned subsequent Polish-Russian borderland was functioning af- boundaries and solved the problem of com- ter the local border traffic agreement had en- muters – mainly people who owned arable tered into force. The conducted analysis indi- land on the other side of a border (for in- cates that local border traffic is a tool that the stance, such agreements were concluded be- European Union and/or state authorities fail tween Hungary and Yugoslavia, Poland and to take advantage of, and which introduction Czechoslovakia, Norway and Finland).
Recommended publications
  • SGGEE Guidelines Revision Last.Docx

    SGGEE Guidelines Revision Last.Docx

    Standards for Locations in the MPD May 31, 2012 Page 18 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Appendix A How to find locations in Eastern Europe I, Frank Stewner, would like to demonstrate with a few examples how I would find today locations of my family. In the 18th century, many members of the Stefner/Stewner family were living in the Salzburg area, Austria and migrated several times during the next 250 years: Salzburg -> East-Prussia –> Poland –> Volhynia –> Russia –> Volhynia –> Poland –> Germany. Many moved from Volhynia to Canada. Content: Village County State Country North East Page St. Johann-Huttegg St. Johann, Salzburg, Austria 471430 131149 18 Klein Degesen/Klein Lucken Nesterov, Kaliningrad, Russia 543148 222658 20 (Vyselki), Marijampole Mariampol (Marijampole), Marijampole, Lithuania 543300 232100 23 , Przasnysz, Przasnysz, Mazowieckie, Poland 530110 205248 24 Lipiny, Ciechanow, Mazowieckie, Poland 524824 202446 26 Makowitz (Makowice/ Novograd- Zhytomyr, Ukraine 503648 273300 28 Makovytsi), Volynskyi, Samara (Kuybyshev), Samara, Samara, Russia 531400 501000 31 Pawlodar (Pavlodar), , Pavlodar, Kazakhstan 521656 765744 31 Beschlejewka (Beshleyevka), , Chelyabinsk, Russia 541733 624956 31 Orenburg, Orenburg, Orenburg, Russia 514700 550600 33 Toptscha (Topcza/ Topcha), Korets, Rivne, Ukraine 504337 270313 33 Neusalz (Nowa Sol), Nowa Sol, Lubuskie, Poland 514800 154300 33 Posen (Poznan), Poznan, Wielkopolskie, Poland 522426 165453 34 Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 533334 100049 34 1. St. Johann-Huttegg in the Archdiocese of Salzburg, Austrian Empire I discovered that 8 Stefner/Steffner-families were forced to migrate from the Salzburg area to East- Prussia. This occurred during 1731-32 and was imposed by the Prince-Archbishop of Salzburg Leopold Anton E. Freiherr von Firmian. He ordered the expulsion of those Lutherans who did not convert to Catholicism.
  • Projekt Uchwały W Sprawie Sieci Szkół

    Projekt Uchwały W Sprawie Sieci Szkół

    Projekt UCHWAŁA NR ……………………. Rady Gminy Braniewo z dnia …………….lutego 2017 r. w sprawie dostosowania sieci szkół podstawowych i gimnazjów do nowego ustroju szkolnego Na podstawie art. 18 ust. 2 pkt 15 ustawy z dnia 8 marca 1990 r. o samorz ądzie gminnym (Dz. U. z 2016 r. poz. 446, 1579 i 1948) oraz art. 206 ust. 1 – 4, art. 207, art. 210 ust.1, art.117 ust.1 i ust. 3, art. 127 ust.4, art. 129 ust.16 i art. 191 ust.1 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 2016 r. Przepisy wprowadzaj ące ustaw ę - Prawo o światowe (Dz. U. z 2017 r. poz. 60); uchwala si ę, co nast ępuje: § 1. Uchwała okre śla: 1) plan sieci publicznych szkół podstawowych prowadzonych przez Gmin ę Braniewo, a tak że granice obwodów publicznych szkół podstawowych prowadzonych przez Gmin ę Braniewo , na okres od 1 wrze śnia 2017 r. do dnia 31 sierpnia 2019 r., który stanowi zał ącznik 1 do niniejszej uchwały; 2) plan sieci prowadzonego przez Gmin ę Braniewo publicznego gimnazjum i klas dotychczasowych publicznego gimnazjum prowadzonych w szkole podstawowej oraz granice obwodu dotychczasowego publicznego gimnazjum i klas dotychczasowego gimnazjum prowadzonego przez Gmin ę Braniewo na okres od 1 wrze śnia 2017 r. do dnia 31 sierpnia 2019 r., który stanowi zał ącznik 2 do niniejszej uchwały; 3) projekt planu sieci publicznych o śmioletnich szkół podstawowych prowadzonych przez gmin ę, a tak że granice obwodów publicznych o śmioletnich szkół podstawowych prowadzonych przez Gmin ę Braniewo, od dnia 1 wrze śnia 2019 r., który stanowi zał ącznik 3 do niniejszej uchwały.
  • In the Kaliningrad Region

    In the Kaliningrad Region

    INVESTMENTS AND BUSINESS IN THE KALININGRAD REGION Representative office of the NEW OPPORTUNITIES Kaliningrad region government MAXIMUM LENGTH GENERAL OF THE TERRITORY INFORMATION Sovetsk 108 КМ108 ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE KALININGRAD KALININGRAD Baltiysk Chernyakhovsk 15,1 K Gusev КМ² REGION TERRITORY 205 КМ SOVETSK BALTIYSK BORDER TERRITORIES 40 K PEOPLE 33 K PEOPLE 22 BALTIC SEA CITIES CHERNYAKHOVSK GUSEV N REPUBLIC 37 K PEOPLE 28 K PEOPLE W E OF LITHUANIA S Representative office of the REPUBLIC Kaliningrad region 1 government OF POLAND POPULATION 7 600 GRADUATES ANNUALLY 994 686 PEOPLE 60% 16 DATED WORKING-AGE HIGHER POPULATION EDUCATION 01/01/2018 INSTITUTIONS 9 900 5,2% PEOPLE MIGRATION UNEMPLOYMENT GROWTH RATE 66 PEOPLE/КМ² POPULATION Representative office of the DENSITY Kaliningrad region 2 government 12 PLACE IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION EDUCATION IMMANUEL KANT BALTIC FEDERAL UNIVERSITY Institute of Living Systems Engineering and Technology Institute Institute of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and Information Technologies Medical Institute European Business School Science and Technology Park KALININGRAD STATE and Factory 10 400 TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY Research Institute of Applied Informatics STUDENTS and Mathematical Geophysics IT and Situational Centre IN HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS Agriculture and Aquaculture Center for Medical Biotechnology Food Biotechnology, high-technology seafood processing PARTICIPANTS Energy Security Small-tonnage Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Marine Convention Training 5-100 The main marine university of Russia
  • Uchwała Nr 45/VII/2018 Z Dnia 25 Maja 2018 R

    Uchwała Nr 45/VII/2018 Z Dnia 25 Maja 2018 R

    DZIENNIK URZĘDOWY WOJEWÓDZTWA WARMIŃSKO-MAZURSKIEGO Olsztyn, dnia 29 czerwca 2018 r. Poz. 2949 UCHWAŁA NR 45/VII/2018 RADY GMINY BRANIEWO z dnia 25 maja 2018 r. w sprawie przyjęcia „Gminnego Programu Opieki nad Zabytkami Gminy Braniewo na lata 2018-2021” Na podstawie art. 7 ust. 1 pkt 9, art 18 ust. 2 pkt 15 ustawy z dnia 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie gminnym (tekst jedn.: Dz.U. z 2017 r. poz.1875) oraz art. 87 ust. 3 i 4 ustawy z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami (j.t. Dz.U z 2017 r. poz.2187) Rada Gminy Braniewo uchwala, co następuje: § 1. Przyjmuje się „Gminny Program Opieki nad Zabytkami na lata 2018-2021 dla Gminy Braniewo”, stanowiący załącznik do niniejszej uchwały. § 2. Wykonanie uchwały powierza się Wójtowi Gminy Braniewo. § 3. Uchwała wchodzi w życie z dniem podjęcia i podlega ogłoszeniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Województwa Warmińsko-Mazurskiego. Przewodniczący Rady Gminy Sergiusz Kaliszuk Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Warmińsko-Mazurskiego – 2 – Poz. 2949 Załącznik do Uchwały Nr 45/VII/2018 Rady Gminy Braniewo z dnia 25 maja 2018 r. PROGRAM OPIEKI NAD ZABYTKAMI DLA GMINY BRANIEWO NA LATA 2018 – 2021 Czerwiec 2017 Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Warmińsko-Mazurskiego – 3 – Poz. 2949 SPIS TREŚCI 1. WSTĘP 1.1. PODSTAWA PRAWNA OPRACOWANIA GMINNEGO PROGRAMU OPIEKI NAD ZABYTKAMI 5 1.2. CEL OPRACOWANIA GMINNEGO PROGRAMU OPIEKI NAD ZABYTKAMI 2. UWARUNKOWANIA FORMALNO–PRAWNE, INSTYTUCJONALNE I PROGRAMOWE FUNKCJONOWANIA OCHRONY ZABYTKÓW W GMINIE BRANIEWO 2.1. USTAWY REGULUJĄCE PROBLEMATYKĘ OCHRONY ZABYTKÓW I OPIEKI NAD ZABYTKAMI 2.2. STRATEGICZNE CELE POLITYKI PAŃSTWA W SFERZE OCHRONY ZABYTKÓW 2.3.
  • Obszarowe Ujęcie Rewitalizacji W Polsce

    Obszarowe Ujęcie Rewitalizacji W Polsce

    Monografie i Studia Instytutu Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiello ńskiego Obszarowe uj ęcie rewitalizacji w Polsce Redakcja naukowa Aleksander Noworól Instytut Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiello ńskiego w Krakowie Kraków 2010 Autorzy tomu: Brygida Beata Cupiał, Ryszard Ćwiertniak, Henryk Gawro ński, Edyta Kowalska, Tadeusz Markowski, Moterski Filip, Wro ński Stanisław Recenzent: Krzysztof Skalski Redakcja Serii: Redaktor Naczelny: dr hab. prof. UJ Aleksander Noworól Sekretarz: dr Wioleta Karna Rada Naukowa: prof. dr hab. Barbara Ko żuch – przewodnicz ąca dr hab. Stefan Biela ński dr hab. prof. UJ Anna Lubecka prof. dr hab. Gra żyna Prawelska-Skrzypek dr hab. prof. UJ Renata Przygodzka dr hab. in ż. arch. prof. UJ Krzysztof Skalski prof. dr hab. Kazimierz Z. Sowa prof. dr hab. Łukasz Sułkowski dr hab. prof. UJ Andrzej Szopa © Copyright by Instytut Spraw Publicznych UJ ISBN : 978-83-931253-0-2 Wydanie elektroniczne: Instytut Spraw Publicznych UJ ul. Prof. Łojasiewicza 4, 30-348 Kraków tel.12 664 55 44, fax 12 644 58 59 e-mail: [email protected]; www.isp.uj.edu.pl Spis tre ści Słowo wst ępne 5 Edyta Kowalska Jak polskie miasta zarz ądzaj ą procesami rewitalizacji? 9 Ryszard Ćwiertniak Znaczenie procesu rewitalizacji obiektów i obszarów powojskowych w rozwoju lokalnym i regionalnym miast i gmin 29 Brygida Beata Cupiał Realizacja programów rewitalizacji w województwie lubuskim 47 Henryk Gawro ński Uwarunkowania realizacji „Programu rewitalizacji gospodarczej obszaru delty Wisły i Zalewu Wi ślanego” 67 Tadeusz Markowski, mgr Filip Moterski Wykorzystanie materialnego dziedzictwa poprzemysłowego w procesie rewitalizacji na przykładzie Łodzi 85 Stanisław Wro ński Bydgoszcz – rewitalizacja miasta i Bydgoskiego W ęzła Wodnego.
  • A Captive Island Kaliningrad Between MOSCOW and the EU

    A Captive Island Kaliningrad Between MOSCOW and the EU

    41 A CAPTIVE ISLAND KAlInIngRAD bETWEEn MOSCOW AnD ThE EU Jadwiga Rogoża, Agata Wierzbowska-Miazga, Iwona Wiśniewska NUMBER 41 WARSAW JULY 2012 A CAPTIVE ISLAND KALININGRAD BETWEEN MOSCOW AND THE EU Jadwiga Rogoża, Agata Wierzbowska-Miazga, Iwona Wiśniewska © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITORS Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITORS Katarzyna Kazimierska, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Jim Todd GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH CHARTS, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Wojciech Mańkowski DTP GroupMedia PuBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978–83–62936–13–7 Contents KEY POINTS /5 INTRODUCTION /8 I. KALININGRAD OBLAST: A SUBJECT OR AN OBJECT OF THE F EDERATION? /9 1. THE AMBER ISLAND: Kaliningrad today /9 1.1. Kaliningrad in the legal, political and economic space of the Russian Federation /9 1.2. Current political situation /13 1.3. The current economic situation /17 1.4. The social situation /24 1.5. Characteristics of the Kaliningrad residents /27 1.6. The ecological situation /32 2. AN AREA UNDER SPECIAL SURVEILLANCE: Moscow’s policy towards the region /34 2.1. The policy of compensating for Kaliningrad’s location as an exclave /34 2.2. The policy of reinforcing social ties with the rest of Russia /43 2.3. The policy of restricted access for foreign partners to the region /45 2.4. The policy of controlling the region’s co-operation with other countries /47 3.
  • Studium Uwarunkowań I Kierunków Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Gminy Braniewo

    Studium Uwarunkowań I Kierunków Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Gminy Braniewo

    RADA GMINY BRANIEWO DO WYŁOŻENIA STUDIUM UWARUNKOWAŃ I KIERUNKÓW ZAGOSPODAROWANIA PRZESTRZENNEGO GMINY BRANIEWO KIERUNKI ROZWOJU PRZESTRZENNEGO GMINY POLITYKA PRZESTRZENNA CZĘŚĆ II ZAŁĄCZNIK NR 1 DO UCHWAŁY NR …………… RADY GMINY BRANIEWO Z DNIA ……… ./2017 R Braniewo 2017 r 1 1. Zespół autorski studium w 1998r. • mgr inż. arch. Jacek Bocheński • mgr Stanisław Olech • inż. arch. Anna Talaga 2. Zespół autorski zmiany studium w 2007r. • inż. arch. Anna Talaga inż. Jolanta Celej tech. Bożena Małysko 3. Zespół autorski zmiany Studium w 2012 r. Inż. urb. Wojciech Kwiatkowski mgr Wioleta Kwiatkowski 4. Zespół autorski studium w 2017r. • mgr Dagmara Kownacka • mgr Michał Polański • inż. arch. Anna Talaga 2 SPIS TREŚCI 1. Wstęp………………………………… 6 1.1. Podstawa prawna..........................................................................................................................6 1.2. Ogólna charakterystyka studium...............................................................................................6 2. Uwarunkowania………………………………………………………………………………….7 2.1. Synteza uwarunkowań zagospodarowania przestrzennego gminy braniewo.........................7 2.1.1.UWARUNKOWANIA STANOWIĄCE PODSTAWĘ ROZWOJU GMINY...............................................7 2.1.2.UWARUNKOWANIA OGRANICZAJĄCE ROZWÓJ GMINY..............................................................9 3. Cele rozwoju gminy braniewo ……………………………………………………………... 10 3.1. Cel nadrzędny.............................................................................................................................10
  • I.S. Gumenyuk T. Studzieniecki

    I.S. Gumenyuk T. Studzieniecki

    Spatial Planning Transport is an important tool to sup- CURRENT port interregional cross-border cooperati- AND PROSPECTIVE on. Moreover, transport is a traditional area of cooperation between neighbou- TRANSPORT ring regions. In this study, we analyse the CONNECTIONS BETWEEN features and configuration of today’s transport links between Russian and Po- POLAND’S BORDER lish border regions and examine a range VOIVODESHIPS of transport projects aimed at a more di- versified and intensive cooperation. We AND RUSSIA’S believe that priority should be given to the KALININGRAD REGION projects that are beneficial to all the parties. As of the beginning of 2018, Russian — Polish cross-border cooperation was sus- tained by road, railway, and, to a degree, 1 I. S. Gumenyuk marine transport links. There is a vast va- 2 riety of projects aimed to create new trans- T. Studzieniecki port links between the border regions. The- se projects differ in timelines, scopes, and the range of resources required. In our opinion, the most promising project in a short-term perspective is the establish- ment of a waterway connection between Russian and Polish ports. The project in- cludes the seaport terminal in Pionersky in the Kaliningrad region. Another promi- sing project is the launch of a cross-bor- der passenger railway connection using a European gauge. Keywords: transport connections, cross- border cooperation, Russian-Polish state border, transport projects, transport corri- dors ¹ Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Introduction 14 A. Nevskogo St., Kaliningrad, 236016, Russia. ² Gdynia Maritime University, Cooperation among regions of 81—87 Morska St., Gdynia, neighbouring countries is a multi-as- 81—225, Poland.
  • The Development of New Trans-Border Water Routes in the South-East Baltic: Methodology and Practice Kropinova, Elena G.; Anokhin, Aleksey

    The Development of New Trans-Border Water Routes in the South-East Baltic: Methodology and Practice Kropinova, Elena G.; Anokhin, Aleksey

    www.ssoar.info The development of new trans-border water routes in the South-East Baltic: methodology and practice Kropinova, Elena G.; Anokhin, Aleksey Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Kropinova, E. G., & Anokhin, A. (2014). The development of new trans-border water routes in the South-East Baltic: methodology and practice. Baltic Region, 3, 121-136. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2014-3-11 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51373-9 E. Kropinova, A. Anokhin This article offers an integrative ap- THE DEVELOPMENT proach to the development of trans-border water routes. Route development is analy- OF NEW TRANS-BORDER sed in the context of system approach as in- WATER ROUTES tegration of geographical, climatic, mea- ning-related, infrastructural, and market- IN THE SOUTH-EAST ing components. The authors analyse the Russian and European approaches to route BALTIC: METHODOLOGY development. The article focuses on the in- stitutional environment and tourist and rec- AND PRACTICE reational resources necessary for water route development. Special attention is paid to the activity aspect of tourist resour- * ces. At the same time, the development of Ö.
  • Why Kaliningrad Region?

    Why Kaliningrad Region?

    Kaliningrad region Government NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUISNESS DEVELOPMENT GENERAL INFORMATION MAXIMUM LENGTH NORWAY OF THE TERRITORY SWEDEN ESTONIA 108 КМ 108 LATVIA RUSSIA KALININGRAD LITHUANIA 15.1 REGION 205 КМ THS КМ² REGION IRELAND TERRITORY BELARUS ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER GERMANY POLAND 22 ENGLAND CITIES KALININGRAD >480 CHECH UKRAINE THOUSAND PEOPLE SLOVAKIA AUSTRIA MAIN CITIES FRANCE HUNGARY SOVETSK BALTIYSK SWITZERLAND ROMANIA >40K PEOPLE >36K PEOPLE CHERNYAKHOVSK GUSEV ITALY >37K PEOPLE >28K PEOPLE SVETLOGORSK >22K PEOPLE SPAIN BULGARIA PORTUGALPORRTUGALR Kaliningrad region Government GREECE POPULATION 60% WORKING-AGE POPULATION > 1 MIL PEOPLE DATED 01/08/2018 >10 THOUSAND PEOPLE PER YEAR >4.5 MIGRATION THOUSAND 5.2% GROWTH GRADUATES ANNUALLY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE >66 PEOPLE PER KM2 13 POPULATION DENSITY HIGHER EDUCATION 12TH PLACE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION INSTITUTIONS Kaliningrad region Government ECONOMIC 524 $ 102 $ PERFORMANCE 33 536 ₶ 6 579 ₶ PER MONTH М2 PER YEAR AVERAGE SALARY RENTAL PRIСE FOR COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE 10.2 PROPERTIES BN $ 0.06 $ 400 $ 3.7 25 800 ₶ 641.58 BN ₶ kWh PER YEAR FOREIGN TRADE ELECTRICITY PRICE INTERNET PRICE TURNOVER 0.02 $ 2018 1.2 ₶ PER MIN OUTGOING CALLS 7. 2 2.08 0.74 $ 48 ₶ BN $ BN $ PER LITER 417.4 BN ₶ 130.5 BN ₶ PRICE OF GASOLINE GROSS INVESTMENTS CAPITAL REGIONAL DONE BY PRODUCT ORGANIZATIONS 2017 2018 Kaliningrad region Government SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE >129 1 BN ₶ MIL ₶ SEZ REGIME COVERS 2 BN $ 0.02 MIL $ THE WHOLE REGION SEZ REGIME IS REGULATED TOTAL AMOUNT MINIMUM BY THE REGIONAL AUTHORITIES
  • Rozkłady Jazdy Autobusu Szkolnego Do Szkoły Podstawowej I Gimnazjum W Szlenach I Lipowinie Obwiązujacy Od Dnia 2.11.2017 Roku

    Rozkłady Jazdy Autobusu Szkolnego Do Szkoły Podstawowej I Gimnazjum W Szlenach I Lipowinie Obwiązujacy Od Dnia 2.11.2017 Roku

    ROZKŁADY JAZDY AUTOBUSU SZKOLNEGO DO SZKOŁY PODSTAWOWEJ I GIMNAZJUM W SZLENACH I LIPOWINIE OBWIĄZUJACY OD DNIA 2.11.2017 ROKU PRZYSTANKI GODZINY GODZINY ODJAZDÓW PKS ODJAZDÓW PKS BRANIEWO D.K 6:50 BRANIEWO D.K 13:00 BEMOWIZNA 6:59 SZYLENY 13:20 MARCINKOWO 7:07 BRZESZCZYNY 13:25 BRZESZCZYNY 7:09 MARCINKOWO 13:27 SZYLENY 7:13 BRANIEWO SP6 13:55 BEMOWIZNA 7:21 PODLEŚNE 14:15 BRANIEWO UL.AK 7:28 MACIEJEWO 7:39 LIPOWINA 7:45 MACIEJEWO 7:51 BRANIEWO D.K 8:01 14:55 PRZYSTANKI GODZINY ODJAZDÓW BRANIEWO DK 6:41 BRANIEWO SZKOŁA 6:42 MŁOTECZNO 6:46 RODOWO 6:48 GRONOWO 6:51 KALINÓWEK 6:54 PODLEŚNE 6:55 KALINÓWEK 6:56 PĘCISZEWO 7:01 KALINÓWEK 7:06 GRONOWO 7:09 RODOWO SKRZ. 7:13 RODOWO 7:14 ZGODA 7:16 RODOWO 7:18 RODOWO SKRZ. 7:19 MŁOTECZNO 7:20 BRANIEWO SZKOŁA 7:24 SZYLENYSKRZ. 7:28 BEMOWIZNA II 7:31 BEMOWIZNA 7:32 SZYLENY 7:34 CHŁOPKI 7:35 BRZESZCZYNY 7:38 BRZESZCZYNY ZR 7:39 BRZESZCZYNY 7:40 CHŁOPKI 7:43 SZYLENY 7:45 SZYLENY KOL. 7:45 SZYLENY SKRZ. 7:48 BRANIEWO DK 7:52 ROZKŁAD JAZDY AUTOBUSU SZKOLNEGO DO SZKOŁY PODSTAWOWEJ NR 6 SZKOŁY PODSTAWOWEJ W SZYLENACH I GIMNAZJUM NR 1 W BRANIEWIE PRZYSTANKI GODZINY GODZINY ODJAZDÓW ODJAZDÓW BRANIEWO UL. AK 15:15 15:30 LIPOWINA MACIEJEWO ŚWIĘTOCHOWO BOBROWIEC BEMOWIZNA 15:30 SZYLENY 15:40 SZYLENY CHŁOPKI 15:41 BRZESZCZYNY 15:43 MARCINKOWO 15:50 BEMOWIZNA BRANIEWO ROZKŁADY JAZDY AUTOBUSU SZKOLNEGO DO SZKOŁY PODSTAWOWEJ I GIMNAZJUM W LIPOWINIE I GIMNAZJUM NR 1 W BRANIEWIE OBWIĄZUJACY OD DNIA 2.11.2017 ROKU PRZYSTANKI GODZINY GODZINY ODJAZDÓW ODJAZDÓW PĘCISZEWO 6:51 15:58 GRZECHOTKI 7:00 ŻELAZNA GÓRA 7:06 BRANIEWO 7:38 15:10 ROZKŁADY JAZDY AUTOBUSU SZKOLNEGO DO SZKOŁY PODSTAWOWEJ I GIMNAZJUM W LIPOWINIE GMINA BRANIEWO OBWIĄZUJACY OD DNIA 2.11.2017 ROKU PRZYSTANKI GODZINY ODJAZDÓW BRANIEWO UL.KOŚ.
  • Dziennik Urzędowy

    Dziennik Urzędowy

    DZIENNIK URZĘDOWY WOJEWÓDZTWA WARMIŃSKO-MAZURSKIEGO Olsztyn, dnia 14 kwietnia 2021 r. Poz. 1374 ZARZĄDZENIE NR 22/VIII/2021 WÓJTA GMINY BRANIEWO z dnia 26 marca 2021 r. w sprawie przyjęcia sprawozdania z wykonania budżetu gminy za 2020 rok Na podstawie art. 267 ust. 1 pkt 1 i art. 269 ustawy z dnia 27 sierpnia 2009 r. o finansach publicznych (t.j. Dz. U. z 2021 r. poz. 305 z późn. zm.) zarządzam, co następuje: § 1. Przyjąć sprawozdanie z wykonania budżetu gminy za 2020 rok stanowiące załącznik do niniejszego zarządzenia, według którego: - plan dochodów po dokonanych zmianach wynosi - 29.597.542,59 zł - wykonanie - 30.326.973,97 zł - plan wydatków po dokonanych zmianach wynosi -30.719.352,31 zł - wykonanie - 28.934.543,87 zł § 2. Sprawozdanie o którym mowa w § 1 przekazać: 1) Radzie Gminy, 2) Regionalnej Izbie Obrachunkowej w Olsztynie. § 3. Zarządzenie wchodzi w życie z dniem podpisania i podlega ogłoszeniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Województwa Warmińsko-Mazurskiego. Wójt Gminy Braniewo Jakub Bornus Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Warmińsko-Mazurskiego – 2 – Poz. 1374 Załącznik Nr 1 do zarządzenia Nr 22/VIII/2021 Wójta Gminy Braniewo z dnia 26 marca 2021 r. SPRAWOZDANIE Z WYKONANIA BUDŻETU GMINY BRANIEWO ZA 2020 ROK Wójt Gminy Braniewo 2021-03-26 SPIS TREŚCI WSTĘP I. WYKONANIE BUDŻETU GMINY ZA 2020 ROK II. DOCHODY III. WYDATKI IV. SPRAWOZDANIE Z WYDATKÓW ZWIĄZANYCH Z OCHRONĄ ŚRODOWISKA I GOSPODARKĄ WODNĄ V. WYKONANIE ZADAŃ W RAMACH FUNDUSZU SOŁECKIEGO NA DZIEŃ 31.12.2020 ROK VI. SPRAWOZDANIE Z DZIAŁALNOŚCI GOPS W BRANIEWIE VII. OCHRONA ZDROWIA VIII. PROMOCJA GMINY I WSPÓŁPRACA Z ORGANIZACJAMI POZARZĄDOWYMI IX.