DOCSLIB.ORG

Corridor Market Study – Expanded Rail Service in the First Wilderness Corridor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final Report Corridor Market Study – Expanded Rail Service in the First Wilderness Corridor Prepared for Warren County by IBI Group With River Street Planning and Development and Business Opportunity Management Consulting July 3, 2018 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 2 Current Status ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 SNCR Railway Services .......................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Recently offered rail services ...................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Previously offered rail services ................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Partnerships/Packages: .............................................................................. 9 2.2 Previously Completed Plans and Reports ............................................................... 9 2.2.1 Northern Hudson River Inter-Municipal Redevelopment Strategy: First Wilderness Market Study - Warren County, 2002 ...................................... 9 2.2.2 Connecting Millennials to the Adirondacks - The Wild Center, 2016 ........ 10 2.2.3 First Wilderness Market Study - Saratoga EDC, Towns of Hadley, Johnsburg, Lake Luzerne, Chester, Thurman, Stony Creek, Saratoga, Greenfield, Corinth, Day, Edinburgh, 2003 ............................................... 10 2.2.4 Rediscovering the First Wilderness Master Plan - Action Plan Update, 2015 - First Wilderness Heritage Corridor, New York State Department of State .......................................................................................................... 11 2.2.5 Hadley Hamlet Pedestrian Linkage Study and Main Street Improvement Plan - Town of Hadley and CDTC, 2006 .................................................. 11 2.3 Ridership Statistics ................................................................................................ 11 2.4 Summary ................................................................................................................ 12 3 Market Assessment .......................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Demographic Scope .............................................................................................. 13 3.1.1 Warren County .......................................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Capital Region ........................................................................................... 14 3.1.3 New York Metropolitan Area ..................................................................... 15 3.2 Tourism Growth Trends ......................................................................................... 16 3.2.1 International and National Tourism Trends ............................................... 16 3.2.2 The Adirondacks Tourism Trends ............................................................. 17 3.2.3 New York State Tourism Trends ............................................................... 17 3.2.4 Warren County Tourism Trends ................................................................ 17 3.2.5 Saratoga Springs ...................................................................................... 19 Table of Contents (continued) 3.2.6 Saratoga and North Creek Railway (SNCR) Corridor ............................... 19 3.3 Summary ................................................................................................................ 19 4 Proposed Train Service Expansion ................................................................................ 20 4.1 Existing and Potential Rail Service Markets .......................................................... 20 4.2 Operations ............................................................................................................. 21 4.3 Service Improvements ........................................................................................... 21 4.3.1 Service Improvement Issues ..................................................................... 21 4.3.2 Alternative Service Plans .......................................................................... 23 4.4 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 24 4.5 Summary ................................................................................................................ 25 5 Economic Impact Case Study Analysis ......................................................................... 30 5.1.1 Algoma Central Railway: Wilderness Tourism by Rail Opportunity Study (2007) ........................................................................................................ 30 5.1.2 County of Ulster, NY: Highest and Best Use Recommendations U&D Railroad Corridor (2015) ........................................................................... 31 5.1.3 Adirondack Rail Corridor Economic Impact Study .................................... 31 5.1.4 Implementation Plan and Economic Impact Analysis: Colebrookdale Railroad Heritage Railway Program (All based off of a model) ................ 32 5.1.5 Valley Railroad State Park Economic Impact Study (In the Connecticut River Valley) .............................................................................................. 32 5.1.6 Economic Impacts of the Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad – Antonito, Colorado and Chama, New Mexico .......................................................... 33 5.1.7 Tourist Rail Operation – LM&M Railroad: City of Lebanon, Ohio (2013) .. 33 5.1.8 Adirondack Scenic Railroad: North County Regional Economic Impact Analysis (2011) ......................................................................................... 34 5.2 Summary ................................................................................................................ 34 6 Context Assessment ........................................................................................................ 35 6.1 Study Area ............................................................................................................. 35 6.2 Challenges and Opportunities ............................................................................... 35 6.3 Attractions and Tourism Support Facilities ............................................................ 37 6.4 North Creek Station ............................................................................................... 40 6.4.1 Past Successes and Opportunities ........................................................... 40 6.4.2 Present Conditions (2017) ........................................................................ 40 ii Table of Contents (continued) 6.4.3 Seasonal Attractions ................................................................................. 41 6.4.4 Transportation ........................................................................................... 42 6.5 Riparius Station ...................................................................................................... 42 6.6 The Glen Station .................................................................................................... 43 6.6.1 Opportunities: ............................................................................................ 43 6.7 Glen Hudson Campsite Station ............................................................................. 43 6.8 Thurman Station .................................................................................................... 43 6.8.1 Opportunities: ............................................................................................ 44 6.9 Stony Creek Station ............................................................................................... 44 6.9.1 Opportunities: ............................................................................................ 45 6.10 Hadley-Luzerne Station ......................................................................................... 45 6.10.1 Opportunities: ............................................................................................ 45 6.11 Corinth Station ....................................................................................................... 46 6.12 Saratoga Springs Station ....................................................................................... 46 6.13 Summary ................................................................................................................ 46 7 Existing Markets Potential ............................................................................................... 47 7.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 47 7.2 Markets Segments ................................................................................................. 48 7.2.1 Train Aficionados ...................................................................................... 48 7.2.2 Local General Transportation ................................................................... 49 7.2.3 Experiential Trips ...................................................................................... 49 7.2.4 Touristic Trips ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • General History

    General History

    General History 4/1/1839 (H&SG) The Adirondack Railroad Co. was organized with $100,000 capitol. It was to connect the Adirondack Iron Works with Clear Pond. Nothing was ever done. [I don't think this company is related to the following ones.] 3/7/1848 (Senate Document #39) "Report of The Railroad Committee on The Petition for a Railroad From Sackett's Harbor to Saratoga." "...the petitioners solicit the grant of a date to construct a railroad from Sackett's Harbor up the Black river to its source - thence along the east branch of West Canada Creek to the Sacandaga River, and down it to some point near Saratoga Springs." "...allowing for curvatures it is estimated at 140 miles." 4/10/1848 (H&SG) The Sackets Harbor & Saratoga Railroad was organized with $2,000,000 capitol. It was to connect the two towns of its name and tap the iron mines at Sanford Lake. It was only partially graded from Saratoga. [ A map of this period shows the proposed line following the same path as the present line.] (H&SG, 1873, p. 149*) After incorporation in 1848, the company was organized on January 10, 1852. (Senate Document #55, 1884) When the railroad was organized in 1848, they were required to pay New York State $5,000 to have the right to select any quantity of land up to 250,000 acres within the next three years. They had three years to commence work and ten years to complete the line or the company was liable to be dissolved and its franchise forfeited.
  • Rediscovering the First Wilderness

    Rediscovering the First Wilderness

    REDISCOVERING THE FIRST WILDERNESS INTER-MUNICIPAL REDEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE NORTHERN HUDSON RIVER WITH THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT T H E S A R A T O G A A S S O C I A T E S Landscape Architects, Architects, Engineers, and Planners, P.C. Saratoga Springs ¢ New York City ¢ Boston © Copyright All Rights Reserved The Saratoga Associates © REDISCOVERING THE FIRST WILDERNESS © © REDISCOVERING THE FIRST WILDERNESS © © REDISCOVERING THE FIRST WILDERNESS © TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................I-1 II. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS............................................................................................... II-1 A. REGIONAL SETTING, HISTORY AND COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS.................................. II-2 B. NATURAL RESOURCES........................................................................................................... II-4 1. TOPOGRAPHY............................................................................................................... II-4 2. FLOODPLAINS .............................................................................................................. II-5 3. WETLANDS .................................................................................................................. II-8 4. OPEN SPACE................................................................................................................. II-9 C. OTHER ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE FEATURES ...........................................................
  • Results of Spirit Leveling in New York

    Results of Spirit Leveling in New York

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED*STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 514= RESULTS OF SPIRIT LEVELING IN NEW YORK 1906 TO 1911, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER WASPIINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation............................ .............................. 5 Previous publication.................................................. 5 Corrections ............................................................ 5 Personnel............................................................. 7 Classification.......................................................... 7 Bench marks........................................................ 7 Datum............................................................... 8 Topographic maps...................................................... 8 Primary leveling........................................................... 12 Dannemora, Loon Lake, Lyou Mountain, and Santa Clara quadrangles (Clinton and Franklin counties)........................................ 12 Massena and Potsdam quadrangles (St. Lawrence County)................ 17 Antwerp, Canton, Hammond, and Ogdensburg quadrangles (Jefferson and St. Lawrence counties).............................................. 18 Big Moose, Carthage, Lowville, McKeever, Number Four, and Port Leyden quadrangles (Herkimer, Lewis, and Oneida counties)................. 23 Cooperstown, Hartwick, and New Berlin quadrangles (Chenango, Madison,
  • Petition to Maine's Congressional Delegation

    Petition to Maine's Congressional Delegation

    Haskell Rock Pitch, East Branch of the Penobscot Photo by Mark Picard We Support a New National Park and National Recreation Area To Maine’s Congressional Delegation: We urge you to support the creation of a 150,000‐acre National Park and National Recreation Area east of Baxter State Park, as proposed by Elliotsville Plantation, Inc. The proposed National Park and National Recreation Area would have significant conservation and recreation benefits, and would also stimulate much‐needed economic development in the Katahdin region. That is why the proposal has earned the endorsement of the Katahdin Area Chamber of Commerce and Katahdin Rotary Club, among others. We urge you to support legislation in Washington, D.C. to establish the new National Park and National Recreation Area. Respectfully, 13,580 people from 371 Maine cities and towns, 50 U.S. states, and 53 nations Maine Ted Asherman (Falmouth, ME) David Asselin (Rockland, ME) Tammy Abbott (Holden, ME) Catherine Athay (Trenton, ME) Victoria Abbott (Chelsea, ME) Daniel Atkins (Brunswick, ME) Ann Adams (Portland, ME) Joan Atkinson (Vassalboro, ME) Gina Adams (Longmont, ME) Roberta Atkinson (Damariscotta, ME) Lorette Adams (Mars Hill, ME) Phillip Attean (Indian Island, ME) Susan Adams (Augusta, ME) Debbie Atwood (Bath, ME) Susanna Adams (Portland, ME) Joan Atwood (Bath, ME) Jean Adamson (Hampden, ME) Mary Atwood (Kennebunk, ME) Marlene Aguilar (Lewiston, ME) Buck Auchincloss (Waterville, ME) Gertrude Akers (Andover, ME) David Auclair (Augusta, ME) Tim Akers (Andover, ME) Lisa Audino (Northport,
  • Download Sep/Oct 2017

    Download Sep/Oct 2017

    KEY LOCK & LANTERN Sep/Oct 2017 NEWS Issue No.47 The Bi-Monthly Digital Supplement to Key Lock & Lantern Magazine Gaithersburg Community Museum North Creek Depot Adirondack Scenic California State RR Museum Rail Fair Receives Court Ruling Museum Programs Key, Lock & Lantern A non-profit membership KEY LOCK & LANTERN corporation dedicated to the preservation of transportation history and railroad memorabilia The mission of Key, Lock & Lantern is to gather and publish information on the NEWS history of the transportation industry, The Bi-Monthly Digital Supplement to Key Lock & Lantern Magazine and to support the preservation of railroad artifacts. KL&L members have WWW.KLNL.ORG an interest in all aspects of railroad & transportation history, from research and Sep/Oct 2017 Issue #47 preservation projects to the conservation and restoration of all types of historical From the President’s Desk ...........................................................3 memorabilia. Originally formed in 1966, Railroad Event Calendar...............................................................3 Key, Lock & Lantern, Inc. was officially incorporated in 1988 as a non-profit, Gaithersburg Community Museum .............................................4 educational, membership corporation in the State of New Jersey, under the California State Railroad Museum Programs..............................8 provisions of Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. KL&L Magazine Goes to Press...................................................10 Membership
  • High Resolution Adobe PDF

    High Resolution Adobe PDF

    116°40'0"W 116°20'0"W Southwest Butte 116°0'0"W Elk Butte Quartzite Butte " " " KIRKWOOD CREEK JOHN DAY MOUNTAIN FLORENCE HANOVER MOUNTAIN LUCILE MARBLE BUTTE d Black Butte F R d e l orenc Butzien Butte " Whiskey Butte R k "GOSPEL HUMP W"JIoLhDnsEoRn NBuEtSteS K e e " Looking Glass Butte s e s r le " r C C re n e o k s i l R l HAT POINT d FRANK CHURCH - RIVER OF NO RETURN WILDERNESS OLD TIMER MOUNTAIN A KESSLER CREEK RIGGINS Old Timer Mounta"in RIGGIBNeSrg HMOouTn taSinPRINGS KELLY MOUNTAIN Preacher Mo"untain t Kelly Mountain CAREY DOME S Riggins JOHNSON BUTTE !( " " rx a Bald Mountain M Schoolmarm Peak Blue Mountain d d R " R " " ls 2 Dev i 9 even 5 S d a o R p d o R l o er ve R ad 31 Marshall Mountain N E Z P E R C E N F iv e lop 8 Rd R D ve N d Indian Mountain t e " pi s D a " re t R o s N F e " Sheep Mountain tl r 0 O a o ' " N F 0 Cannon Ball Mountain l t 2 HELLS CANYON WILDERNESS a ° " 5 G Sheep Lake N 4 Patrick Butte War Eagle Mountain SQUIRREL PRAIRIE Baldy Lake E HEAVENS GATE " HE DEVIL POLLOCK " ¤£95 PATRICK BUTTE HERSHEY POINT Pyramid Mountain BURGDORF WAR EAGLE MOUNTAIN R " Granite Mountain Lava Butte Crystal Mountain " O " " Bryan Mountain d Bear Pete Mountain Cliff Mountain R " " ke " a Hard Butte L 2 ad 1 R k " Ro l p d Jackley Mountain" velo E De Middle Mountain t s Casey MountainMonum"ent Peak re o " " F tl a Ruby Mountain N " EmmeEtt mMeoruanldta iLnake Big Hazard Lake " Curren Mountai"n Pollock Mountain WHITE MONUMENT White Mountain Hazard Lake BlacPk yLrakmeid Peak Hells Canyon Reservoir " POLLOCK MOUN" TAIN PURGATO"RY
  • Study Area Summary

    Study Area Summary

    Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Wild and Scenic River Inventory Documentation Last Updated 03/25/2010 BIG SHEEP CREEK A suitability study was conducted on Big Sheep Creek in the Wild and Scenic River Study report and final legislative environmental impact statement for eight rivers administered by the Wallowa-Whitman National forest. In that study, Big Sheep Creek was not found suitable as a Wild and Scenic river. Given this finding of unsuitability, this stream is no longer considered eligible, regardless of the presence of outstanding remarkable values. Location: This study focuses on the potential eligibility and classification of Big Sheep Creek from its headwaters to the Imnaha Wild and Scenic River Boundary (near the confluence of Big Sheep Creek and the Imnaha River, Section 20, T. 1 N., R. 48 E., W.M.). The current boundary of the Imnaha Wild and Scenic River incorporates 1/8th of a mile of Big Sheep Creek. River Mileage: Studied: 49.1 Eligible: 49.1 Eligibility Determination of Free-flow: The study segment contains two small, 3- to 5-foot diversion dams which are used seasonally to divert water for irrigation and power generation (see Fisheries and Water Development sections). Despite these low dams or diversion works, the river is found to be free-flowing. SCENERY Determination of Outstandingly Remarkable Values: Big Sheep Creek begins above 8,000 feet on the eastern edge of the Eagle Cap Wilderness in the Wallowa Mountains and flows for 40 miles to the Imnaha River. The upper portion is composed of the North, Middle, and South Forks, which are respectively, 2, 4, and 3 miles in length.
  • Mineral Occurrences of New York State with Selected References to Each Locality

    Mineral Occurrences of New York State with Selected References to Each Locality

    Mineral Occurrences of New York State with Selected References to Each Locality By ELAI E M. LUEDKE, CHESTER T. WRUCKE, and ]OH A. GRAHAM CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1072 - F Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Museum and Science Service, Geological Survey ' UNITED STATES GOVER G OFFICE WASHI . GTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTME 1T OF THE I TERIOR FRED A. SEATO , Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. olan, Director The U.S. Geological urvey Library has cataloged this publication ns follows: Luedke, Elaine McNallan, 1931- Mineral occurrences of New York State with selected references to each locality, by Elaine 1. Luedke, Chester T. Wrucke, and John A. Graham. Washington, . S. Govt. Print. Off., 1959. iii, 3 5-444 p. col. map (in pock t) 25 em. ( . S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1072--F. Contributions to economic geology) "Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Museum and Science Service, Geological Survey." 1. Mines and mineral resources- ew York (State)-Bibl. (S~ ries: U. S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1072--F. Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Contributions to economic geology) 553.09747 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S . Government Prlntln!,t Office Washln~ton 25, D . C. CONTENTS Page Ab tract_ ____ - -------------------------- ------------- ------ ------- 385 Introduction_------------- ---------- - -------------- --------------- 385 Anortho ite_- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _______ __ __ _ 386 ~en i c __ _______
  • Lesley (1885) Geologic Hand Atlas

    Lesley (1885) Geologic Hand Atlas

    echoed: «: J.CC>CCC:< c.ccxC «L. • \*f',«L::-' m CC:cC •«;. ft *?3£g.. • <... £C- : <«s <: I < <c.«j : . .«-•«: cere L < & ;: CC «Gy><, ore . <?< C4 V c .-* cc C ccccccc, , k • X C C ^ CC' CC ' < i - <sc<:<: tccacoe • C C«C jk-cc; g cc ttc cc.. ccc -:<. C<i-<T S-.5CJ § ^ <£H 95c« <I ccc £T-*t CC & c cc c *,< < £' ' ._ CSUt . i .C"'C<"« res c«x c e_. c c«:c v. 7* «S c«r CC" cc • c*ccc: cc cc c «: c *f£ ' t, cc c rm <*c-fl CC CC ' K<c<C~C« CCC( C fCCt'i (.CCC ^CCXT-CV SS C <Xi <<c rf ceo «r«8J *r<rc - :<«:«r<:u:cc( rucccrcoco- CC « : £C,C <CC^«CcVc: cc c c cc cc. c«l «: <c <a c c *:< '®coc"<3::c.oci CjQe^c.C:a,;cflC CCxc. ,Ci-,<r<irc:CiX^rc:c «? •:ccf <€?:.€,«. C ' OG'tO,C«v xCyfCcC'r -. ar%'C'C^-c c < oCTCtcc cc - «T'cccfc -' -C«;<" _ 7""C 'C 3 C C C < , cc;. : 5.^ rteLCffe: • j c< sC* ^ ..cc: '<,"* c c ^C«!CC .<OClC( <-' tCC 'CCICtC: C'.»C •Vcc^'ccccc &'c<:c a ccc jCxlc ,c <«7C C c"<:cC Cte"- -XlcCCC \t <srcc CCCtC<rccc < ficcc c :<$:.QCil € CCCC' .<ccc icrcc c c Cccc «cc;r cr CCCC ^ttm'C« c cc CTCTcc< fc cc <- c < ,<;c.c.c c«: Ccc c ss c'^VC v«jc:<> c ' -< CC c c. t- C C CC C C c 5 cc«cc<;..c: _Cxoc 'cx-cS :: < ccc.c c c :#CCCCrvc j : «•< ccc < t .OC.CCCCCCA' c cc c c < .
  • First Wilderness Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan-2012 2011-2012

    First Wilderness Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan-2012 2011-2012

    First Wilderness Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan-2012 2011-2012 First Wilderness Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Prepared by: Adirondack North Country Association, Saranac Lake, New York Ann Ruzow Holland, Ph.D., Community Planning Advisor, Willsboro, New York Warren County Planning Department, Lake George, New York 2012 This project, administered by the New York State Department of Transportation and managed by the Adirondack North Country Association, was funded by a grant to the New York State Scenic Byways Program through the Federal Highway Administration and the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. First Wilderness Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan-2012 2011-2012 Table of Contents 001 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 002 Overview and Rationale for Proposed Changes ..................................................................................... 3 003 Vision, Theme, and Intrinsic Qualities .................................................................................................... 7 004 Byway Goals ................................................................................................................................................. 9 005 Scenic Byway Program and Definitions ................................................................................................. 12 006 Project Management Structure ...............................................................................................................