Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 1 Country Overview 1 Country Overview 2 Key Data 3 Montenegro 4 Southeastern Europe 5 Chapter 2 7 Political Overview 7 History 8 Political Conditions 11 Political Risk Index 43 Political Stability 57 Freedom Rankings 72 Human Rights 84 Government Functions 87 Government Structure 89 Principal Government Officials 94 Leader Biography 95 Leader Biography 95 Foreign Relations 98 National Security 100 Defense Forces 102 Chapter 3 105 Economic Overview 105 Economic Overview 106 Nominal GDP and Components 112 Population and GDP Per Capita 114 Real GDP and Inflation 115 Government Spending and Taxation 116 Money Supply, Interest Rates and Unemployment 117 Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate 118 Data in US Dollars 119 Energy Consumption and Production Standard Units 120 Energy Consumption and Production QUADS 122 World Energy Price Summary 123 CO2 Emissions 124 Agriculture Consumption and Production 125 World Agriculture Pricing Summary 128 Metals Consumption and Production 129 World Metals Pricing Summary 131 Economic Performance Index 132 Chapter 4 144 Investment Overview 144 Foreign Investment Climate 145 Foreign Investment Index 147 Corruption Perceptions Index 160 Competitiveness Ranking 171 Taxation 180 Stock Market 181 Partner Links 181 Chapter 5 183 Social Overview 183 People 184 Human Development Index 186 Life Satisfaction Index 190 Happy Planet Index 201 Status of Women 210 Global Gender Gap Index 211 Culture and Arts 220 Etiquette 221 Travel Information 221 Diseases/Health Data 230 Chapter 6 235 Environmental Overview 235 Environmental Issues 236 Environmental Policy 237 Greenhouse Gas Ranking 239 Global Environmental Snapshot 250 Global Environmental Concepts 261 International Environmental Agreements and Associations 275 Appendices 299 Bibliography 300 Montenegro Chapter 1 Country Overview Montenegro Review 2016 Page 1 of 312 pages Montenegro Country Overview MONTENEGRO Located in southeastern Europe, Montenegro, which means "Black Mountain", borders Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Kosovo, and Albania. About half of it is covered in thick forest. At the end of World War II, Montenegro became a constituent republic of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. When the latter dissolved in 1992, Montenegro federated with Serbia, first as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and, after 2003, in a looser union of Serbia and Montenegro. In a May 2006 referendum, Montenegro emerged as a sovereign state after just over 55 percent of the population opted for independence. Montenegro is endowed with mineral resources, primarily bauxite, adequate water supplies, and a climate conducive to agriculture and tourism. The economy is highly dependent on aluminum exports and tourism. Montenegro Review 2016 Page 2 of 312 pages Montenegro Key Data Key Data Region: Southeastern Europe Population: 647073 Hot summers and cold winters; areas of high elevation have short, cool Climate: summers and long, severe winters; mild, rainy winters along coast. Ijekavian dialect -- sometimes called Montenegrin -- is the official language; Languages: Serbian, Albanian, Bosnian, Croatian, Romany also spoken Currency: Euro National day is July 13, 1878; referendum on independence held on May 21 Holiday: 2006; independence delared on June 3, 2006 Area Total: 14026 Area Land: 13812 Coast Line: 294 Montenegro Review 2016 Page 3 of 312 pages Montenegro Montenegro Country Map Montenegro Review 2016 Page 4 of 312 pages Montenegro Southeastern Europe Regional Map Montenegro Review 2016 Page 5 of 312 pages Montenegro Montenegro Review 2016 Page 6 of 312 pages Montenegro Chapter 2 Political Overview Montenegro Review 2016 Page 7 of 312 pages Montenegro History Synopsis The use of the name Montenegro began in the 15th century when the Crnojevic dynasty began to rule the Serbian principality of Zeta; over subsequent centuries it was able to maintain its independence from the Ottoman Empire. From the 16th to 19th centuries, Montenegro became a theocratic state ruled by a series of princes and in 1852, it was transformed into a secular principality. After World War I, Montenegro was part of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, and, at the conclusion of World War II, it became a constituent republic of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. When the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was dissolved in 1992, Montenegro federated with Serbia as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). In March 2002, an agreement on governance between Serbia and Montenegro was signed, officially changing the name of the country from the Republic of Yugoslavia to Serbia and Montenegro and changing the federation into a new "Union of States" (also referred to as a "community of states"). The move essentially ended the country once known as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). A new structure for constitutional government was also promulgated and ratified at that time. The country was a confederal parliamentary democratic republic, with two constituent states, the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Montenegro. The Serbian province of Kosovo has been governed by the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) since 1999, under the authority of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 and has self government. In May 2006, Montenegro voted in favor of independence from Serbia. Thus ended the country known only for a few years as Serbia and Montenegro. Serbia became the successor state of what had once been the Yugoslav Federation. Montenegro became one of the world's newest independent states. History of Montenegro Montenegro's native name, "Crna Gora," translates in meaning to "black mountain" and Montenegro Review 2016 Page 8 of 312 pages Montenegro presumably references the dark colored forests and woodlands of the Dinaric Alps on the coast. The current name, Montenegro, is believed to be rooted in Venetian cultural ascendancy of the region during the Middle Ages, and also translated into meaning "black mountain." The area of current Montengro, like all the Balkans, was colonized by waves of Slavs from the 6th and 7th centuries. Some schools of thought have argued that ethnic Montenegrins came from the area between the Baltic Sea and Hanover in Germany in the 6th century, while Serbs and Croats arrived in the 7th century. By the 10th century, Slav tribes intermarried and intermixed with Illyrians (predecessors of the modern Albanians), Romans and Avars, effectively complicating the ethnic and cultural makeup of the Balkan region. Roman influence was most pronounced in the religious realm as pagan Montenegrins turned to Christianity. The 10th century also marked the establishment of a semi-autonomous dukedom called Duklja. It was recognized as independent by Pope Gregory VII in the early 11th century and King Mihailo of the Vojisavljevic dynasty was made king. The new kingdom shared a relationship with the Byzantine Empire, characterized by the fact that it paid tribute to the Byzantines. Power struggled weakened the kingdom and contributed to the rise of new centers of power and control. Indeed, in the late 11th century and early 12th century, there were two main political centers in the region -- Zeta, located in the mountains of present-day Montenegro, and Raska, located in modern southwestern Serbia. The zupan of Raska, Stefan Nemanja threw off Byzantine domination in the 12th century, subordinated Zeta, and incorporated it into Raska (Serbia). In this way, the first period of Montenegrin statehood ended. Moreover the foundation for medieval Serbia was laid by the conqueest of Zeta and part of southern Dalmatia. The first Serbian autonomous state was then formed. The zupan's son and successor, Stefan II Nemanja, transformed Serbia into a stable state in the late 12th century and early 13th century, friendly with Rome but with religious loyalty to Constantinople. In 1218, Pope Honorius III recognized Serbian political independence and crowned Stefan II king. In the 14th century, following the death of the Serbian tzar, Dusan Nemanjic, the kingdom began to crumble. A new Balsic dynasty, which was so-called in honor of its founder Balsa I, reasserted Zeta's independence. The ascendancy of the Balsics also corresponded with the rising influence of the Roman Catholic Church in Montenegro. Under Balsa's sons, Zeta's territory expanded and was consolidated. The 15th century marked the end of the Balsic dynasty. The next thirty years were a period of strife and struggle in Zeta with competing clans fighting for power and control. So emerged a new Montenegrin dynasty -- the Djurasevic family of the Crnojevic clan. Although the Ottoman Empire controlled the area to the south and east during this period, Zeta was not fully conquered. Montenegro Review 2016 Page 9 of 312 pages Montenegro The Crnojevics saw Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina fall to the powerful Ottoman armies, but Zeta did not suffer the same fate. This was largely due to the decision by Ivan Crnojevic to move the capital from Zabljak on Lake Skadar into the highland valley of Lovcenski Dolac. With the Ottomans advancing in northern Albania, Zeta joined forces with Venice to fight off the threat. While there was some retrenchment of territory, sovereignty was preserved and gave rise to a cultural renaissance in the area that is now modern Montenegro. Following the Crnojevics came rulership by the Vladikas or Bishops for about 180 years. Vladikas were regarded as spiritual leaders as well as political ones, and they came to power via election by popular assemblies. Although something of a theocratic regime, rule by the Vladikas was not brutish or autocratic. Instead, they used moral persuasion to command the people. Despite the fact that Ottoman control surrounded the area of modern-day Montenegro, under the Vladikas, sovereignty prevailed. Nevertheless, Montenegro, like Serbia, eventually came under the rule of the Ottoman Turks for the duration of their reign in the Balkans. When the Turks were removed from the area, Montenegro became an independent principality within the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but did not become an independent sovereign state until 1878. During World War I, Montenegro fought on the side of the Allies but was defeated and occupied by Austria.
Recommended publications
  • Assessment of the National Integrity System of Montenegro
    ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO This project is supported by the European Union. The content of this does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the report lies entirely with the author ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Title: ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Publisher: Network for affirmation of NGO sector - MANS Monitoring and Analytic Programme Authors: Vanja Ćalović, Executive Director Vuk Maraš, Monitoring and Analytic Programme Director Aleksandar Maškovic, Analytic Programme Coordinator Veselin Radulovic, MANS’ Legal Advisor Print: 3M - Makarije Edition: 30 copies Contact: Dalmatinska 188, Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: +382 20 266 326 Fax: +382 20 266 328 E-mail: [email protected] www.mans.co.me CONTENTS I INTRODUCTORY NOTE ........................................................................................................................... 7 II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 11 III ABOUT THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESMENT .............................................. 21 IV COUNTRY PROFILE OF MONTENEGRO ..................................................................................... 27 V CORRUPTION PROFILE ......................................................................................................................... 31 VI ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTIVITIES .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Balancing Behavior Through Montenegro's Accession
    Thinking Geopolitically: NATO’s Balancing Behavior Through Montenegro’s Accession Master’s Thesis By Melike Kaptan May 23, 2018 Master of Science in International Relations and Diplomacy Faculty of Governance and Global Affairs Leiden University 2016-2018 Thinking Geopolitically: NATO’s Balancing Behavior Through Montenegro’s Accession Student Name: Melike Kaptan Student Number: s1891405 First Supervisor: Dr. Marinko Bobic Second Supervisor: Dr. Peter van Ham Cover photo: Geographic location of Montenegro in Europe. Source: OperationWorld.net, 2018. Word Count: 20.451 i Acknowledgments This Master’s thesis is a product of an intense and comprehensive two-year MSc program of International Relations and Diplomacy, provided by dedicated instructors from Leiden University and the Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”. Under the tutelage of my professors, I have obtained a whole new set of tools to study and understand the phenomena of the current world order from a different viewpoint. For that, I would like to express my most sincere gratitude to all my professors, and the MIRD staff who have shown continuous unwavering support in all my academic endeavors. I would also like to especially thank my First Supervisor Dr. Marinko Bobic for his guidance and his confidence in me. Without his dedicated support throughout my thesis period, this end product could not have reached its full potential. Another special thank you goes for my Second Supervisor Dr. Peter van Ham for his most constructive feedback that allowed me to build my research design on such concrete basis. Lastly, I must express my profound gratitude to Ragnhild Drange for her assistance, my colleagues and friends from MIRD program for their support and my parents for their love, guidance and constant encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Montenegro's Protests Are Unlikely to Spell the End for Milo
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/11/20/why-montenegros-protests-are-unlikely-to-spell-the-end-for-milo-dukanovic/ Why Montenegro’s protests are unlikely to spell the end for Milo Đukanović Starting in late September, Montenegro has experienced a stream of protests, with police at times resorting to the use of force to disperse protesters. Mirko Bošković writes that initially the protests were driven by an opposition party, the Democratic Front, and were perceived to be largely pro- Russian and anti-NATO in nature. While this ensured a substantial part of the country’s civil society did not participate in the demonstrations when they first began, the situation changed dramatically following the authorities’ attempts to repress the movement. The anti-government character of the demonstrations has now taken centre stage, with protesters calling for ‘the first free and fair elections in the history of Montenegro’ and the end of Milo Đukanović‘s 26-year-long rule. The ongoing protests that are taking place in Montenegro’s capital Podgorica started on 27 September, when the Democratic Front (DF), a composite coalition of opposition parties with different ideologies, placed tents on the boulevard in front of the Parliament, in an act reminiscent of the recent protests in neighbouring Macedonia. The demonstrations were directed against the government but also against Montenegro’s NATO membership. Officially, the goal of the protesters was not only to stop Montenegro’s advance toward joining NATO, whose invitation is expected to come on 1 December, but the timing of the demonstrations and the way in which the protesters have acted could not hide that objective.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Montenegro R01761
    Date Printed: 11/03/2008 JTS Box Number: IFES 8 Tab Number: 11 Document Title: Republic of Montenegro: Voter Awareness Assessment Legal Review, Nov 1997-Feb Document Date: 1998 Document Country: Montenegro IFES ID: R01761 A L o F \ o REpUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT LEGAL REVIEW NOVEMBER 1997 - FEBRUARY 1998 PREPARED By: CATHERINE BARNES, PROJECT TEAM LEADER ALEXANDRA LEV ADITIS, PROGRAM ASSISTANT DANIEL FINN, LEGAL ADVISOR IFES ~ International Foundation for Election Systems 1l0115th Street, NW, Third Floor Washington, DC 20005 This Report was made possible by a grant/rom the United States Agency for International Development (USA/D). The opinions expressed in this Report are solely of the International Foundation/or Election Systems (IFES). This material is in the public domain and may be reproduced wilhout permission, citation is appreciated. REpUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT LEGAL REVIEW NOVEMBER 1997-FEBRUARY 1998 ISBN 1-879720-48-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................•................................................... :.................................................... 1 VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................5 A. MISSION BACKGROUND .......................................................................................5 B. MISSION OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................5 C. SCOPE OF MISSION ...............................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 April 2001
    CG/CP (8) 5 REV Standing Committee Report on the observation of the early parliamentary elections in Montenegro, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 April 2001 Rapporteur : Mr Tomas JIRSA (Czech Republic) Adopted by the Standing Committee on 31 May 2001 --------------------------- At the invitation of Mr Svetozar Marovic, President of the Montenegrin Parliament, and of the Yugoslav authorities, through their Consul General in Strasbourg, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE) was invited to observe the early parliamentary elections held on 22 April 2001. The elections were called by the President of the Republic of Montenegro on 20 February, following the People's Party's withdrawal from the governing coalition and the Montenegrin Parliament's decision to dissolve itself. At its meeting of 7 March 2001, the Bureau of the Congress decided to send an observer delegation comprising Mr Tomas JIRSA (Czech Republic, L, Head of the delegation), Mrs Ayse Bahar CEBI (Turkey, L), Mr Fabio PELLEGRINI (Italy, L), Mr Constantinos TATSIS (Greece, R) and Mrs Lea TOLONEN (Finland, R), accompanied by Mr Alessandro MANCINI and Miss Sylvie AFFHOLDER (Congress Secretariat). Meanwhile, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe had appointed six observers: Mr Andreas GROSS (Switzerland, SOC), Mrs Vera SQUARCIALUPI (Italy, SOC), Mr Lauri VAHTRE (Estonia, EPP), Mr Claude FREY (Switzerland, LDR), Mr Cevdet AKÇALI (Turkey, EGD) and Mr Pierre GOLDBERG (France, UEL), accompanied by three members of its Secretariat. The Council of Europe delegation worked closely with the election observation mission appointed by the OSCE/ODIHR and wishes to thank Mr Vulchanov, Head of the Mission, and his team for their assistance and logistical support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bureau of the Congress Verification of New Members
    The Bureau of the Congress CG/BUR18(2018)131 19 March 2018 Verification of new members’ credentials Co-rapporteurs:2 Michail ANGELOPOULOS, Greece (L, EPP/CCE) Eunice CAMPBELL-CLARK, United Kingdom (R, SOC) Preliminary draft resolution .......................................................................................................................... 2 Summary The rapporteurs review the credentials of the new members in the light of the current criteria of the Congress Charter and Rules and Procedures. Document submitted for approval to the Bureau of the Congress on 26 March 2018 1 This document is classified confidential until it has been examined by the Bureau of the Congress. 2 L: Chamber of Local Authorities / R: Chamber of Regions EPP/CCE: European People’s Party Group in the Congress SOC: Socialist Group ILDG: Independent and Liberal Democrat Group ECR: European Conservatives and Reformists Group NR: Members not belonging to a political group of the Congress Tel ► +33 (0)3 8841 2110 Fax ► +33 (0)3 8841 2719 [email protected] CG/BUR18(2018)13 PRELIMINARY DRAFT RESOLUTION 1. In compliance with the Congress’ Charter and Rules and Procedures, the countries listed hereafter have changed the composition of their delegation due to either the loss of mandate or the resignation of some members of the delegation: Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Georgia, Ireland, Latvia, Montenegro, Norway, Romania, Spain, Sweden, “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, United Kingdom. 2. At present there are 5 representative seats and 11 substitute seats vacant out of a total of 648 seats. The countries concerned – Germany, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, France, Italy, Poland and Romania – are invited to complete their delegation.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro: Overview of Political Corruption
    MONTENEGRO: OVERVIEW OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION QUERY SUMMARY Can you provide an overview of and background to Corruption remains one of the key challenges that recent measures taken to address political Montenegro faces in the process of its further corruption in Montenegro? democratisation. CONTENT In particular, abuse of public office and resources for private benefit and corruption within the political 1. Overview of political corruption in Montenegro parties and electoral processes are seen as some 2. Elections of the greatest challenges in the fight against political corruption in the country. 3. Party financing 4. Immunity In recent years, Montenegro has made progress in 5. Code of conduct for politicians strengthening its incomplete legislative framework 6. Conflict of interest rules around issues of political corruption. Laws on 7. Asset declaration rules political party financing, prevention of conflict of 8. References interest and asset declarations have been amended, and in 2013 the government also \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ adopted a new Action Plan for the Fight against Corruption and Organised Crime for 2013-2014. Author Samridhi Shukla, [email protected] However, implementation and enforcement of the Reviewer(s) laws on the ground continue to be weak. Entities Marie Chêne; Dieter Zinnbauer, PhD, Transparency that supervise the implementation of laws are either International not entirely independent or lack sufficient power and resources to sanction perpetrators, particularly in Date the case of senior public officials. 20 May 2014 © 2014 Transparency International. All rights reserved. This document should not be considered as representative of the Commission or Transparency International’s official position. Neither the European Commission, Transparency International nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information.
    [Show full text]
  • Vodacom Newsletter No 27/July - September 2016
    Vodacom Newsletter No 27/July - September 2016 • Inauguration ceremony for the WWTP for Kotor and Tivat • Signed Contract with Hydrophil GmbH in Ulcinj • PU "Water and Sewerage" Ulcinj Opened its Customer Center • Status of Phase III in Bar, Herceg Novi, and Tivat • Visit of KfW mission to Montenegro • On-Site-Visit to Future Construction Sites in Tivat and Kotor, Phase V- Component 1 • Ecological Curiosities Newsletter No 27 July – September 2016 Inauguration ceremony for the WWTP for Kotor and Tivat On 7th of July 2016 there was inauguration ceremony for the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) for Kotor and Tivat in the place Klacina, settlement Obala Djurasevica in Tivat. The invitees and media representatives have been addressed by the Mr. Branimir Gvozdenovic, Minister of Sustainable Development and Tourism in the Government of Montenegro, Mr. Roland Siller, Member of the Management Committee of KfW, Ms. Snezana Matijevic, Mayor of Tivat, Mr. Aleksandar Stjepcevic, Mayor of Kotor, and Mr. Franz Mittermayer, Managing Director of WTE Wassertechnik GmbH. The Contractor is WTE Wassertechnik (Germany), while the Engineer is GkW Consult (Germany). The future WWTP for Kotor and Tivat will have capacity for 72.000 PE. The Project value is Euro 10,247 million. Funding is provided by KfW loan of which 58% should be repaid by the Municipality of Tivat and42% by the Municipality of Kotor. Newsletter No 27 July – September 2016 Signed Contract with Hydrophil GmbH in Ulcinj In Ulcinj is 03 August 2016, signed a Contract with the first-ranked company Hydrophil GmbH on the tender for the selection of the consultantt for the implementation of investment measures project was signed on 03rd of August 2016 in Ulcinj.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. EGP Recommendation Letter URA Montenegro
    Civic Movement URA (United Reform Action) Application for EGP Membership EGP Committee Recommendation Letter General Introduction The European Green Party (EGP) conducted a study visit in August 2019 and a fact-finding mission in early March 2020, as part of the application process of Montenegrin political party URA (United Reform Action). URA has officially applied for EGP membership in October 2019. The EGP has been in contact with URA since 2018. Since then, their party leader attended the Council in Berlin (Germany) in November 2018. After their application, a delegation was invited to the following Council in Tampere (Finland) in November 2019. In August 2019, the study visit included meetings with different structures of URA, activists from NGOs and civil society, supporting citizens movements and struggles with several cases of environmental destruction. The visit showed that URA is a well-established party, respected and in cooperation with civil society, and with a potential to grow. In March 2020, the EGP delegation to Montenegro was made up of Thomas Waitz (Co-Chair), Mar Garcia (Secretary General) and Mélanie Vogel (Member of the Committee responsible for Montenegro). This mission included meetings with the central leadership and Political and Advisory board of URA, their Youth and Women Forum, several local councillors and the local board in Budva. Other meetings were organized with EU Ambassador Orav Aivo and German Ambassador Robert Weber, NGOs Hocu da ostanem and Kor - Coalition for Sustainable Development, LGBT Forum Progress, the chief editor of Balkan Insight, and a Professor of International Environmental and Private Law at the State Law university.
    [Show full text]
  • Parlamentarni Izbori 2009. – Doprinos
    Parlamentarni izbori 2009. Prilog razvoju političkog pamćenja u Crnoj Gori Parlamentarni izbori 2009. Prilog razvoju političkog pamćenja u Crnoj Gori Parlamentarni izbori 2009. Prilog razvoju političkog pamćenja u Crnoj Gori Izdavač Centar za građansko obrazovanje Biblioteka Demokratija Urednica Daliborka Uljarević Redakcija Ana Vujošević, Dragana Otašević, Miloš Vukanović, Selman Adžović Stručna konsultantkinja Jelena Džankić Dizajn i produkcija Ilija Perić IDENTITY & PROMOTION Prelom Nađa Harović Lektura i korektura Centar za građansko obrazovanje Štampa DPC - Podgorica Tiraž 100 primjeraka Ovu publikaciju finansijski je podržala fondacija Heinrich Böll SADRŽAJ Politički kontekst održavanja izbora .............................................................. 5 Izborni programi učesnika i izborne liste 1 .................................................... 9 FORCA – Nazif Cungu .............................................................................................................. 11 Crnogorski komunisti ................................................................................................................. 12 Stranka penzionera i invalida Crne Gore ................................................................................ 16 Narodnjačka koalicija – Narodna stranka i Demokratska srpska stranka ......................... 17 Evropska Crna Gora – Milo Đukanović ................................................................................. 18 Bošnjaci i Muslimani zajedno, jedno ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Selective Sea Blindness—Assessing the Alliance's New
    Naval War College Review Volume 72 Article 4 Number 3 Summer 2019 2019 NATO’s Selective Sea Blindness—Assessing the Alliance’s New Navies Thomas-Durell Young Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Young, Thomas-Durell (2019) "NATO’s Selective Sea Blindness—Assessing the Alliance’s New Navies," Naval War College Review: Vol. 72 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Young: NATO’s Selective Sea Blindness—Assessing the Alliance’s New Navie NATO’S SELECTIVE SEA BLINDNESS Assessing the Alliance’s New Navies Thomas-Durell Young overnments of the countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are guilty of inattention to, and sea blindness in, modernizing their Gnavies� While among “old” NATO navies this reality is understood and docu- mented widely, the state of development and readiness of those navies considered “new” receives considerably less attention�1 On examination, these new navies are deficient in building integrated capabilities, ensuring common operating proce- dures, projecting battlespace awareness, and accomplishing interoperability in all maritime combat domains� This is because of a combination
    [Show full text]
  • Rear Admiral Antonio BASILE Deputy Commander of the Italian Coast Guard CONFITARMA - Confederazione Italiana Degli Armatori - Mr
    Copertina_completa_ Supplemento_Atti RSS.qxp_Layout 1 31/05/20 22:54 Pagina 1 MARINA MILITARE ITALIANA ATTI del XII REGIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Supplemento alla Rivista Marittima Aprile 2020 Venezia 15-18 ottobre 2019 ITALIAN NAVY REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS XII REGIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM - Venice 15-18 october 2019 of the XII REGIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Venice 15-18 october 2019 Supplemento alla Rivista Marittima Aprile 2020 REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS of the XII REGIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Venice 15-18 october 2019 Il Capo di Stato Maggiore della Marina I am writing the foreword of the Proceedings of the 12th Regional Seapower Symposium in a moment when the COVID-19 pandemic is striking indiscriminately peoples across the globe, causing death, suffering and unprecedented recession. Only a few months ago, I had the opportunity and the privilege to meet Chiefs of Navies and representatives of the global maritime system in Venice, discussing with them, in the common interest, the challenges and opportunities of this 21st century, the Blue Century. I believe more than ever that the free, open and constructive debate we had last October represents today not only a concrete analysis of the present time, but also a mutual commitment for future rebirth. Our Navies are indeed expected to play even a more decisive role with a view to the global economic recovery, because everything, I say, everything goes by sea. The pandemic itself, in all its tragic nature, indicates the need to act jointly, under any flag. During these days, I have repeatedly thought over what I said in my closing remarks, “We must face challenges together, because this is our only chance to overcome them.
    [Show full text]